August 17, 2019

Congress to Vote on Scaling Back ObamaCare’s Requirement that Restaurants Print Calorie Counts in Menus

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

*Editor’s Note* – This is a classic example of how those who pretend to be “conservatives” or “liberals” never attack the real problem. Here we see someone attempting to water down a fascist law that requires restaurants to do as the fascist government demands or suffer the consequences. Why can’t we just tell the truth and say that if we actually lived in a free country, no tyrannical government would be forcing anybody to do anything. But, it’s somehow okay to accept the tyranny so long as we just water it down a bit?

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Obama Administration’s FDA Makes it a Felony if Even Small Restaurants Make an Error When Posting Calorie Counts

Administration Also Forbids Restaurants from Posting a Range of Calories for Items, Such as Pizza, That May Be Ordered With Variable Toppings

 

New York, NY – “Few people realize ObamaCare’s tentacles extend all the way into your favorite corner pizza shop, even making an error in posting calorie counts a felony. Congress now has the opportunity to take a small slice out of this terrible law,” says Jeff Stier, Senior Fellow at the National Center for Public Policy Research in Washington, D.C., and head of its Risk Analysis Division.

This week the House of Representatives is expected to debate and vote on theCommon Sense Nutrition Disclosure Act of 2015.

Stier, who is based in Manhattan, was among the first to notice, as well as criticize, the calorie count requirement on menus buried in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), commonly called the Affordable Care Act, or ObamaCare.

The bill would scale back the FDA’s onerous one-size fits all rules implementing the requirement that restaurants post calorie counts on menus.

The White House Office of Management and Budget has determined that the calorie count requirements will require more than 14 million compliance hours and cost more than $1 billion.

“The FDA’s reckless implementation of the calorie-count rule makes the launch ofhealthcare.gov look look seamless by comparison,” says Stier.

“Why didn’t the FDA take advantage of the provision of the bill that directs the agency to revise the regulations to account for the unique attributes of these types of entities without compromising consumers’ access to nutrition information?” asks Stier.

Stier is particularly concerned about the lack of flexibility in the FDA’s approach to how restaurants handle variable menu items. “If a restaurant offers individual toppings or menu items that can be ordered with variations, it should be allowed to post a range of calories rather than a specific count for each of what could be millions of variations,” he says.

“The fact that we even have to resort to fixing the FDA’s rules for implementing menu calorie counts is disheartening, since there’s evidence that mandatory calorie counts actually increase the number of calories people consume at these establishments.”

Stier has been a leading voice against the Obama Administration’s regulatory over-reach into our diets, debating the subject on CNBC and writing about it in the New York Post, Forbes, National Review and elsewhere.

Share