No More Eugenics and Genocide You Claim? I Beg To Differ!

 

The corporate controlled opposition environmentalism groups, such as the Sierra Club and all offshoot affiliated groups are supporting  the fortune 500 corporations and their false claims and criminal actions in every state and across the nation in this massive takeover of all resources public and private. A deep forensic analysis into the authors of the documents these groups are advocating for, those very idealisms are the intellectual property of these large fortune 500 multinational corporations. This leads us to the IMF, the World Bank, The Club of Rome, UNICEP, UNIDROIT, UNEP. Agenda 2100, for the purpose of Sacrificing the American citizenry on the Altar of the Bankers Lie of Economy for a Pretended Exchange of Sustainable Stability through The UNEP and Agenda 21’s  Genocidal, Depopulating, Impoverishment and Enslavement  New Green Order programme through economic strife, scarcity and financial ruination. All of these environmentalists are liars. They are pseudo intellectuals lacking intelligence advocating for their own demise in promoting pseudo sciences which provide only DEATH.

Thanks goes out to There Is No Debt and Six Honest Men;

Obama signs executive order, bypasses Congress, and legalizes all BLM land grabs

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=40858

We read –

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

Reference material providing for clear, obvious and simple full disclosure to the ownership of the US:

OWNERSHIP OF LAW
Ownership of Law

The link to the WIPO database showing the US as copyrighted property has been deactivated. Its archived record on the internet has also been deactivated –

WIPO database constitution of US
http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5395

Archived record of WIPO database link of US constitution
https://web.archive.org/web/20151224204248/http://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/details.jsp?id=5395

Nevertheless, its copyrighted constitution is made available in pdf form –

The Constitution of the United States of America
http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/us/us181en.pdf

Of further interest with regards to the USA that the WIPO Standing Committee on Patents provides, as background to the USA’s legal position, is that its constitution is over-ridden by international treaties, when we read, pages 13 and page 14 respectively –

page 13
U.S. CONST. ART. VI, CL. 2: “This Constitution, and the laws of the
United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all
treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United
States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every
state shall be bound thereby, anything in the Constitution or laws of
any State to the contrary notwithstanding.”

page 14
Treaties are expressly declared to be “the
supreme law of the land.”

Source:

International Privilege Issues: A United States View
WIPO Standing Committee on Patents
5 November 2014
http://www.wipo.int/edocs/mdocs/scp/en/scp_21/scp_21_ref_lewis.pdf

Definition of Notwithstanding

In spite of

Example for Educational Purposes Only

This Constitution, and the laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all treaties made, or which shall be made, under the authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land; and the judges in every state shall be bound thereby,notwithstanding (in spite of) anything in the Constitution or laws of any State to the contrary.

Source:

notwithstanding
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/notwithstanding

The treaties under which the US abides to, as well as all other countries and regional bodies that are a member, are those of the United Nations. And as far as the ownership of the United Nations is concerned, its ownership can be discovered by reading the proofs below;

70 years ago after the Second World War –

Commemorating the UN charter
http://unsdn.org/commemorating-the-un-charter/

Charter of the United Nations
San Francisco, 26 June 1945
http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/cun/cun.html

We read –

“The President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister…representing His Majesty’s Government in the United Kingdom…”

Source:

Atlantic Charter, jpeg
http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFiles/picture/2193631/82786694.jpg

Atlantic Charter
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/wwii/atlantic.asp

~

Definition of And

Used to connect words of the same part of speech, clauses, or sentences, that are to be taken jointly:

‘bread and butter
they can read and write
a hundred and fifty’

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/and

~

Note.-

Both the President of the United States and the Prime Minister are representing His Majesty

We read –

” In the Declaration by United Nations of 1 January 1942, the Allies pledged adherence to this charter’s principles.”

“The Atlantic Charter set goals for the post-war world and inspired many of the international agreements that shaped the world thereafter.”

The policy was issued as a statement; as such there was no formal, legal document entitled “The Atlantic Charter”.

Source:

Atlantic Charter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atlantic_Charter

Note.-

The United Nations “pledges” adherence to the Atlantic Charter, means that the United Nations“allegiance” is to the Atlantic Charter. It is therefore the Atlantic Charter that is in ownership of the United Nations and it, the Atlantic Charter, is in turn in the ownership of the Office titled His Majesty, which Office of Monarchy will pass to the Heirs of that Office.

How interesting that we read, that even before the end of the Second World War, the Atlantic Charter ‘somehow’ prophetically determined the ‘designs’ of the post-war world.

~

The United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) forms the central coordinating core instrument and forum of the United Nations, representing as ‘plenipotentiary’, the direct will of the Office of Monarch:

We read, second paragraph –

‘The ECOSOC serves as the central forum for discussing international economic and social issues, and for formulating policy recommendations addressed to member states and the United Nations system.’

Source:

United Nations Economic and Social Council
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Economic_and_Social_Council

Under the title heading, ‘ECOSOC at a Glance’, we read –

‘The Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) is the United Nations’ central platform for reflection, debate, and innovative thinking on sustainable development.’

Source:

About ECOSOC
http://www.un.org/en/ecosoc/about/

From Encyclopaedia Britannica, we learn –

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)…responsible for the direction and coordination of the economic, social, humanitarian, and cultural activities carried out by the UN. It is the UN’s largest and most complex subsidiary body…ECOSOC was established by the UN Charter (1945)…The council was designed to be the UN’s main venue for the discussion of international economic and social issues. ECOSOC conducts studies; formulates resolutions, recommendations, and conventions for consideration by the General Assembly; and coordinates the activities of various UN organizations…Most of ECOSOC’s work is performed in functional commissions on topics such as human rights, narcotics, population, social development, statistics, the status of women, and science and technology; the council also oversees regional commissions for Europe, Asia and the Pacific, Western Asia, Latin America, and Africa…At the ECOSOC World Summit in 2005, it was mandated that the council convene annual ministerial reviews, designed to monitor progress on internationally agreed development goals, and a biennial Development Cooperation Forum.

Source:

Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC)
http://www.britannica.com/topic/Economic-and-Social-Council

From the United Nations Environment Programmes (UNEP) office in New York, we read and learn –

‘The United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), established in 1972, is the voice for the environment within the United Nations system…UNEP acts as a catalyst, advocate, educator and facilitator to promote the wise use and sustainable development of the global environment. To accomplish this, UNEP works with a wide range of partners, including United Nations entities, international organizations, national Governments, non-governmental organizations (NGOs), the private sector and civil society.’

Source:

ABOUT UNEP
http://www.unep.org/newyork/AboutUNEP/tabid/52259/Default.aspx

We learn under the subheading, Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) –

‘The United Nations Commission on Sustainable Development (CSD) was established by the UN General Assembly in December 1992 to ensure effective follow-up of United Nations Conference on Environment and Development (UNCED), also known as the Earth Summit.’

Source:

UNEP Office New York
ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COUNCIL ECOSOC
http://www.unep.org/newyork/IntergovernmentalPolicyCoordination/EconomicandSocialCouncil/tabid/52272/Default.aspx

NGO Branch, Department of Economic and Social Affairs
About ECOSOC and its Subsidiary Bodies
http://csonet.org/?menu=123

~

Are we to understand the Atlantic Charter to be law, given to mean that it is the will and wish as personally owned private law, through that of the Office of His Majesty, and not that of a legal document constituting a bilateral offer.

From the preceding, it perhaps could be seen that the Atlantic Charter constitutes, in effect, a unilateral offer that brings into employment as employee’s, those that wish to accept ‘acting out their lives’ through continued employment to it. Then from there, it could be said and seen that the Offeror, having fulfiled an obligation to perform in making available the written instrument through which acceptance can be made to it, would have honoured his bargain. As with all else in line with ‘political charters’.

~

Definition of Unilateral Offer
https://www.translegal.com/legal-english-dictionary/unilateral-offer

Definition of Unilateral Contract
http://www.investopedia.com/terms/u/unilateral-contract.asp

Definition of Unilateral Contract
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/unilateral_contract

What’s the Difference Between Bilateral and Unilateral Contracts?
https://www.rocketlawyer.com/article/whats-the-difference-between-bilateral-and-unilateral-contracts.rl

~

Under the subheading, ‘Drafting the Declaration’, we read –

“One major change from the Atlantic Charter was the addition of a provision for religious freedom, which Stalin approved after Roosevelt insisted.”

Source:

Declaration by United Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Declaration_by_United_Nations

Declaration by United Nations
http://legal.un.org/avl/images/ha/cun/06-l.jpg

We read –

“The Governments signatory hereto,
Having subscribed to a common program of purposes and principles embodied in the Joint
Declaration of the President of the United States of America and the Prime Minister of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland dated August 14, 1941, known as the
Atlantic Charter.”

Declaration by the United Nations (January 1, 1942)
http://web.ics.purdue.edu/~wggray/Teaching/His300/Handouts/1942-1-UN-Declaration.pdf

~

The Rothschilds’ Financing of Stalin
http://wakeupfromyourslumber.com/rothschilds-financing-stalin/

Stalin researched the Rothschilds and Venetian Aristocracy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV4edRQWapg

Stalin researched the Rothschilds
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UCI-GWsLdps

Francisco Lopes Suasso
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Francisco_Lopes_Suasso

~

1 January 1955 – Preamble to the Charter of the United Nations: original manuscript prepared for printing.
http://legal.un.org/avl/images/ha/cun/31-l.jpg

26 June 1945
The United Nations Charter open to the signatory page.
http://legal.un.org/avl/images/ha/cun/30-l.jpg

Historic Archives – photo
Charter of the United Nations
San Francisco, 26 June 1945
http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/cun/cun.html

Sourced:

International Organizations
Charter of the United Nations, 1945
http://legal.un.org/avl/ha/instruments.html

~

Under the subheading, ‘Charter Provisions’, we read beneath the subtitle, ‘Preamble’, the words –

“We the peoples of the United Nations determined”

Source:

United Nations Charter
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Charter

Note.-

A perculiar phrasing given the word, peoples, since the word, ‘people’, on its own is both singular and plural in number in its description of those individuals to be found in the physical world.

Whereas the term, peoples, cannot be of the physical world since the term, people, caters for that territory, and therefore, peoples is a description relating to someone’s personally owned private fictitious noun of their own making, within the territory of their imagination.

Furthermore, for the perculiar people to find themselves within the house of the United Nations, as the phrasing mis-leads us to believe, they would need to agree to accept an offer to be able to enter such a house and only then could they be found within its walls; setting aside the notions of personally owned private fictitious intellectual copywritten jurisdictional territory presented here as, the United Nations.

Charter of the United Nations (1945)
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Charter_of_the_United_Nations#Chapter_I_-_Purposes_and_Principles

The United Nations System – Principal Organs
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/challenges-and-opportunities-in-international-business/section_09/a0f9cf51e2388f7267c425efb48c3160.jpg

Source:

5.3 The United Nations and the Impact on Trade
http://2012books.lardbucket.org/books/challenges-and-opportunities-in-international-business/s09-03-the-united-nations-and-the-imp.html

The impact of human activity on biodiversity means human beings (indirect drivers) must be eliminated with the supporting justification of the climate change lie –

Biodiversity
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iv8eI6tCpB8

Where the buck stops – The Club of Rome
http://www.agendatwentyone.wordpress.com/2010/06/28/the-club-of-rome-where-the-buck-stops/

Understanding the present in the light of the future by President Mikhail Gorbachev
http://www.gcint.org/rio20-understanding-the-present-in-the-light-of-the-future/

U.N.’s Shocking Millennium Agenda (21)
http://www.tapnewswire.com/2015/05/the-u-n-s-shocking-millennium-agenda-21/

We read –

Quote by Mikhail Gorbachev, communist and former leader of U.S.S.R.: “The emerging ‘environmentalization’ of our civilization and the need for vigorous action in the interest of the entire global community will inevitably have multiple political consequences. Perhaps the most important of them will be a gradual change in the status of the United Nations. Inevitably, it must assume some aspects of a world government.”

Quote by Gordon Brown, former British prime minister: “A New World Order is required to deal with the Climate Change crisis.”

Expose Agenda 21
https://www.facebook.com/ExposeAgenda21/posts/676836959023268

A quote taken from, Expose Agenda 21, facebook page –

“The real goal of the Earth Charter is that it will
in fact become like the Ten Commandments.”
– Maurice Strong

The Earth Charter – Humanity’s Covenant with the Earth
http://www.green-agenda.com/earthcharter.html

WILDLANDS

TOWARDS A WILDER EUROPE DEVELOPING AN ACTION AGENDA FOR WILDERNESS AND LARGE NATURAL HABITAT AREAS
http://www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2012_Wild_Europe_European_Commission_Towards_a_wilder_Europe.pdf

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

A Little Background History of Pedigree

TOWARDS A WILDER EUROPE DEVELOPING AN ACTION AGENDA FOR WILDERNESS AND LARGE NATURAL HABITAT AREAS

It may do us good, to investigate a little more closely one of the participants, in league with the others, sponsoring the rewilding publication.

The participant in question is the, “Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts (UK)”, whose name is included, among others, at the bottom of the publications pages (acting as its back-cover), to which, together with the other participants, they so lavishly helped to facilitate its sponsorship, in drawing attention to the ambitions of Agenda 21’s Depopulating Programme of Rewilding Europe.

It is not here proposed that an in-depth analysis of this organizations philanthropic pursuits are examined, which unquestionably have done much good, but what is proposed, is to be made aware of the background connections behind these organizations, and their far reaching interests in influencing much of human progress, or as the individual is free to determine for themselves, their far reaching influence in deceivingly stifling human progress.

The case to be presented, is one of providing a sequence of openly available information in the form of website links, that admittedly show that ‘the owners’ behind various philanthropic organizations as ‘their founders’ to them, and not forgetting that that which is ‘founded’ by you is clearly owned by you, surely have strong ties to the contribution of Agenda 21’s ambitions of, ‘harmonising humanities numbers to the earth’s ability of providing sustenance for sustainability to be viable’.

“The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT…was previously known by the names Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves and Royal Society for Nature Conservation.”

History –

“The forerunner of the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, was established by Charles Rothschild in 1912. It aimed initially to draw up a list of the country’s best wildlife sites with a view to purchase for protection as nature reserves, and by 1915 it had drawn up a list of 284, known as Rothschild Reserves.”

Source:

Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society_of_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Nathaniel Charles Rothschild (9 May 1877 – 12 October 1923), known as “Charles”, was an English banker and entomologist and a member of the Rothschild family.

Family –

Charles Rothschild worked as a partner in the family bank NM Rothschild and Sons in London.

Nature conservation –

He was concerned about the loss of wildlife habitats, and in 1912 set up the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, the forerunner of The Wildlife Trusts partnership. In 1915 the Society produced a schedule of the best wildlife sites in the country, some of which were purchased as nature reserves.

Marriage –

In 1907 Charles Rothschild married Rozsika Edle von Wertheimstein (1870 – 30 June 1940), a Hungarian baroness and descendent of…one of the wealthiest families in Europe and had made their fortune over a century before the Rothschilds.

Source:

Charles Rothschild
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Rothschild

~

The Rothschild Reserves –

In 1912 Charles Rothschild founded the ‘Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves’ (SPNR).

More on the Rothschild Reserves –

“What was new about this approach to preserving ‘wild life’ was that it focussed on the habitatrather than just the individual species within it. It highlighted a growing belief that places needed protection from development and other damage. It showed a desire for an ordered and reasoned approach to acquiring nature reserves, in the face of increasign pressure on the natural world and culminated in a ‘shopping list’ of ideal sites – the Rothschild Reserves.”

“…the SPNR always established who the landowner was. The intention at this time was to purchase the land, turn it into a nature reserve and then hand it over to the National Trust to manage under special conditions.”

“It was believed that it was better to fence off nature and leave it to its own devices, rather than practically manage it…”

“The elite conservation crusaders could be seen to have inhabited a moral high ground where, from a lofty height, they shook their fists at progress in their quest for ‘primeval country’ and their desire to shut it off.”

Source:

The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/rothschildreserves

~

Climate Change & Wildlife –

“Climate change is a significant threat to the UK’s wildlife. The Wildlife Trusts believe thatnature should be central to both climate change adaptation (e.g. through the use of natural processes to reduce flood risk) and mitigation (e.g. through the protection and restoration of peat and peatlands to store and sequester carbon).”

“However there is now widespread agreement among scientists that we are living in an era of accelerated climate change, much of which can be attributed to increased human activity (for example through increased carbon emmissions from air pollution).”

Note.-

The words in the phrase, ‘widespread agreement among scientists’, are words that can only be attributed to ‘conflict-of-interest’ based political consesus science, and NOT ‘factual science’.

“Climate change means that there are complex demands being placed on land for food, wildlife, recreation and development. Wildlife has adapted to climate change in the past but our modern landscapes – full of buildings, transport links and intensively managed farmland and fragmented natural habitats – present a new challenge to species. It is vital that we manage and use land sustainably, so it allows plants and animals to move and adapt to new conditions for survival as the climate changes. The Wildlife Trusts’ vision for A Living Landscape is working to bring about landscape scale restoration of the natural environment and adaptation to climate change, realising and using the multiple benefits provided by nature.”

“Protecting and restoring our natural environment and ecosystems is important in its own right…Flood prevention, crop pollination, carbon absorption, clean and healthy water sources – these benefits of our natural environment must all be considered and maximised as we prepare for the effects of climate change. Critically, we need to restore healthy, Living Landscapes that help to alleviate floods, control pollution and help us cope with extremes of temperature.”

“Many of The Wildlife Trusts’ Living Landscape schemes have been designed with climate change adaptation at the forefront. At the heart of Living Landscape approach is habitat restoration and connectivity.”

Source:

Climate Change & Wildlife
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/climate-change

The Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Giammaria Ortes:
The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/ortes.htm

Recruiting the military for Agenda 21’s depopulation genocidal murder

Sustainbilities justification for depopulation, is that there are too many people to harmonise with the earth’s environment, and therefore depopulation is an absolute necessity. Of course, with the fraudulent excuse of false ‘climate change’ science as the driving force behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s ambitions for mass genocidal murder, it comes as no surprise that the Self-Ennobling Ones law enforcement and in particular their military are now positioning and prioritising their role towards sustainablities climate change depopulation ‘development’ agenda, to have the military engage in excused mass murder, on behalf of the Self-Ennobling Ones, covertly presented under a ‘new energy security strategy’ –

PENTAGON PREPARES FOR CENTURY OF CLIMATE EMERGENCIES AND OIL WARS
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Pentagon_prepares_for_century_of_climate_emergencies_and_oil_wars/45538/0/38/38/Y/M.html

~

GB 2293 SPNC
Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts
This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National
Register of Archives digitisation project
The National Archive
National Registar of Archives – NRA 24457

Centre for Urban and Regional Studies University of Birmingham and Institute of Agricultural History
University of Reading
A list of the historical records of the Society for the Promotion of Nature Conservation
Compiled by Philippa Bassett as part of a research project funded by the Social Science Research Council
August 1980

http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/download/GB2293%20SPNC

~

World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)

World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Founders –

Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller

“The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organizationfounded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is theworld’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

“The group’s mission is “to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.”[7] Currently, much of its work focuses on the conservation of three biomes that contain most of the world’s biodiversity: oceans and coasts, forests, and freshwater ecosystems. Among other issues, it is also concerned withendangered species, pollution and climate change.”

Note.-

It is recommended that the entire page is read to acquire a brief working understanding and background to the WWF

Source:

World Wide Fund for Nature
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Fund_for_Nature

~

There is nothing cuddly about the WWF
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100030769/there-is-nothing-cuddly-about-the-wwf/

____

Use of the Glass Prism of Doublespeak to De-mystify Meaning

It becomes clear what the Self-Ennobling Ones agenda really is, for which they have worked diligently towards over a great deal of time, and how in the use of understanding “doublespeak”, they convey that agenda to each other worldwide, as well as to their mis-guided minions.

With a serious appreciation of “doublespeak”, we can come to see it in use for ourselves with negative events around the world demonstrably at odds with official explanations for them, given as one of a ‘rosy outlook’ for the future, when quite obviously the real situation on the ground points to ‘a planned grim outlook’ for the future.

The information to follow then must be interpreted through the light prism of “doublespeak”, through which wording is shone to separate its material for the purpose of seeing true meaning conveyed. That is to say, the opposite of what is presented.

This will no doubt mean, perhaps that given all the accompanying evidence, what is seen before us is not ‘crisis management’ to avert disaster and to ensure continuity for a ‘rosy outlook’ into the future, but through the prisim of doublespeak, what is seen before us are the Self-Ennobling Ones as gods at play, with their preplanned “games” devised for ‘managed controlled rehearsals’ to ensure discontinuity and great suffering through their devices and mechanisms of control.

REFERENCE MATERIAL:

Defininition of Doublespeak

– language that can be understood in more than one way and that is used to trick or deceive people

– language used to deceive usually through concealment or misrepresentation of truth

Sourced:

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doublespeak

Definition of Doublespeak

Doublespeak is language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of words…It may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning (for example, naming a state of war “peace”).

Sourced:

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak

From the description given of “doublespeak”, the agenda behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy becomes clear –

‘Sustainablility and its development’, is a cruel deception in which a vast majority of people in the world, as victims of its ‘doublespeak hidden agenda’, work towards their own elimination, with the enslavement of the surviving few, housed in concentration camp ‘smart growth’ community dwellings, serving the rest of their miserable lives as serfs to the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy.

The prevailing mental condition then is controlled insanity –

Doublespeak is saying one thing and meaning another, usually its opposite.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/dblspkthennow.shtml

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/doublethink.shtml

Reader – doublethink
http://www.orwelltoday.com/readerdoublethink.shtml

Doublespeak publications –

United Nations Publications
PDF Publications
https://unp.un.org/Browse80b2.html?pdf=1

Control of Raw Materials –

The Hunger Games (2012)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1392170/

Note.-

What is of particular interest in the movie, The Hungar Games, is the backdrop through which the movie and the characters are framed. This backdrop of infrastructure is a future sustaiable development environment.

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

The Real Hungar Games (Sustainable Development post 2015) –

Ensuring Discontinuity through Management Game Play –

Food Chain Reaction: A Global Food Security Game
1250 24th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037
info@foodchainreaction.org | © 2015 World Wildlife Fund, Inc.
http://foodchainreaction.org/

Note.-

We read –

About the Organizers

Food Chain Reaction is being produced by World Wildlife Fund and the Center for American Progress, with game design from CNA. Funding and technical support for Food Chain Reaction has been provided by Cargill with major support from Mars, Inc. Additional funding has been provided by Sealed Air Corporation.

Source:

Food Chain Reaction – A Global Food Security Game
About
http://foodchainreaction.org/index.php/about/

~

Organisational Structural Chart for the Control of Raw Material
http://www.larouchepub.com/graphics/1995/eir2249/Freem01.jpg

Source:

The Windsors’ Global Food Cartel: Instrument for Starvation
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1995/2249_windsor_food.html

Primary Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1995/2249_food_intro.html

Alternative Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu38.htm

Hinting towards an arm of sustainable developments preplanned depopulation agenda –

How would your nearest city be affected by a bomb the size of that dropped on Hiroshima?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/11786876/How-would-your-nearest-city-be-affected-by-a-bomb-the-size-of-Hiroshima.html?frame=3399391

~

Note.-

To understand the necessity for war, using manufactured antagonism between countries as a veil to set about eliminating the true enemy (people), particularly timed for the need to distract from discovering the bankers lie of economy, and providing for the bonus of killing two birds with one stone, when it comes to meeting the requirements of obedience and Agenda 21’s depopulation goals.

SPECULATIVE DATES GIVEN FOR WORLD WAR III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/speculative-dates-given-for-world-war-iii/

WHEN DID WORLD WAR III BEGIN ?

The prelude to war can be traced as far back as 2008, when we look at the information under the subtitle heading,

‘PRECAUTIONS TO TRAGEDY TAKE LITTLE TIME IN READING SIMPLY PRESENTED SOLUTION’,

to be found part way down the document –

VACCINES
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vaccines/

_______

Archive for Club of Rome
http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/club-of-rome/

~

The 1001: A Nature Trust
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1001:_A_Nature_Trust

The 1001 Club
http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj32/05.html

The 1001 Club
Bankers, Intelligence Agents, and Raw Materials Executives Striving for a Sustainable Future
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club01.htm

Sourced:

* pre-December 2014 archived version of the site – Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics
https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/index.html

Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics
http://isgp.nl/

ISGP
https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=ISGP&redirect=no

1001 Club – Incomplete Membership List
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club02.htm

The ‘1001 Club’ – a nature trust
http://canadianpatriot.org/archives/1133

~

Transnational Classes and International Relations
By Kees Van der Pijl
https://books.google.pl/books?id=dk4JBjkYCIIC&pg=PA124&lpg=PA124&dq=Prince+Bernhard+%2B+club+of+rome&source=bl&ots=B1w0Os4QeH&sig=ltIb9MTkTUJipCMsFLv0AQ_4EvA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCGoVChMI4ZPavcfvxgIVBf1yCh2-sgMT#v=onepage&q=Prince%20Bernhard%20%2B%20club%20of%20rome&f=false

~

For Educational Purposes Only –

Dr. Claude Martin, Switzerland – Board Member, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Former Director General of WWF
http://www.clubofrome.org/?p=802

~

We read –

The department was separated from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1997

* Department for International Development (DFID)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_for_International_Development

~

We read –

The Duke of Edinburgh is the patron of many organisations, including WWF and the Duke of Edinburgh Award. The Duke was the first President of WWF-UK from its foundation in 1961 to 1982, and President of WWF-International from 1981 to 1996. He is now President Emeritus for WWF.
http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/borneo_forests/about_borneo_forests/borneo_prince_phillip.cfm

~

We read –

Their Patron is HRH The Prince of Wales.

The Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Our mission

To protect and sustainably manage natural ecosystems of the world; to conserve their biodiversity, with emphasis on threatened habitats and endangered species

How We Work –
http://www.worldlandtrust.org/about/how-we-work

~

World Conservation and Wildlife Trust
http://www.wcwtinternational.org/

~

United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development

International Development United States Agency For
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20004
Web: http://www.usaid.gov

A privately held company in Washington, DC
http://www.manta.com/c/mb4n0yg/international-development-united-states-agency-for

International Development United States Agency For
Usaid M/Oaa/Cas
1300 Penn Avenue Nw Room 824-C
Washington, DC 20004 – View Map
Phone: (212) 713-4320
Web: http://www.usaid.gov
Own This Business?

A privately held company in Washington, DC
http://www.manta.com/c/mr4ry0l/international-development-united-states-agency-for

USAID Acronym List
http://www.usaidalumni.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/USAID-Acronym-List-020413.pdf

~

“Bernhard helped found the World Wildlife Fund (later renamed World Wide Fund for Nature), becoming its first President in 1961, and in 1970 establishing the WWF’s financial endowment “The 1001: A Nature Trust”. In 1954, he was a co-founder of the international Bilderberg Group, which has met annually since then to discuss corporate globalization…”

The Prince eventually went to work for the German chemical giant IG Farben, then the world’s fourth-largest company (which survives today as BASF, AGFA, and Bayer). After training, Bernhard became secretary to the board of directors at the Paris office in 1935.

“Prince Bernhard was a member of the “Reiter-SS”, a mounted unit of the SS and joined the Nazi party.[7] He later also joined the National Socialist Motor Corps.”

“With his global contacts, Bernhard in May 1954, was a key figure in organising a meeting at the Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands for the business elite and intellectuals of the Western World to discuss the economic problems in the face of what they characterized as the growing threat from Communism. This first meeting was successful, and it became an annual gathering known as the Bilderberg Group. The idea for the European Union, first proposed by Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950, was encouraged at Bilderberg.”

Note.-

It is recommended that the entire page is read

Source:

Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Bernhard_of_Lippe-Biesterfeld

~

Anton Rupert
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Rupert

~

Sir Julian Huxley is brother to Aldous Huxley

Souce:
Huxley, Arnold Family Tree
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley#/media/File:Huxley-Arnold_family_tree.svg

“Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS[1] (22 June 1887 – 14 February 1975) was a British evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and internationalist.”

“He was secretary of the Zoological Society of London (1935–1942), the first Director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association.”

“In 1959 he received a Special Award of the Lasker Foundation in the category Planned Parenthood – World Population. Huxley was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society and its president from 1959–1962.”

Later career –

“Huxley, a lifelong internationalist with a concern for education, got involved in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and became the organization’s first director-general in 1946.”

“In a fortnight he dashed off a 60-page booklet on the purpose and philosophy of UNESCO, eventually printed and issued as an official document. There were, however, many conservative opponents of his scientific humanism. His idea of restraining population growth with birth control …”

“Huxley’s internationalist and conservation interests also led him, with Victor Stolan, Sir Peter Scott, Max Nicholson and Guy Mountfort, to set up the WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature under its former name of the World Wildlife Fund).”

Note.-

Recommended that the entire page is read

Source:

Julian Huxley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley

~

UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy – The Task of Unifying the World Mind
https://orwelliania.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/unesco-its-purpose-and-its-philosophy-the-task-of-unifying-the-world-mind/

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELmUY4KFUZc

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecx_u0mUHh4

Global Depopulation and the Eugenics Agenda (Full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHqdwmqu-h0

~

UNESCO –

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (French: Organisation des Nations unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture; UNESCO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN). Its purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through education, science, and culture in order to further universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and human rights along with fundamental freedom proclaimed in the United Nations Charter.[1] It is the heir of the League of Nations’International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.

Source:

UNESCO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNESCO

~

UNESCO – It’s Evil Purpose and Philosophy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqv5Q8Ujj2s

~

“He was then married to Margaret “Margo” Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty three years.”

Godfrey A. Rockefeller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_A._Rockefeller

~

Margaret Kuhn Rockefeller daughter of Richard Parker Kuhn

Source:

Caroline Parker Kuhn
b. 26 January 1925, d. 30 April 2011
http://www.woodvorwerk.com/vorwerk/g0/p611.htm

Richard P. Kuhn 1916
1916 Class Crest
Cullum No. 5528 • Jun 28, 1963 • Died in Bedford Hills, New York
Interred in St. Matthews Churchyard, Bedford Hills, NY
https://apps.westpointaog.org/Memorials/Article/5528/

Kuhn, Loeb & Co.
http://www.nndb.com/company/062/000124687/

In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.

http://barefootsworld.net/docs/fedchart.txt

Source:

Who Is Running America ?
http://barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

~

For Educational Purposes Only –

We note UNESCO’s founding influence in the settlement of the Self-Ennobling Ones intellectual copyright institutional agrrangements in securing inheritance rights, between themselves as gods, towards their successor-assigns as beneficiaries, when we read –

1. Introduction, page 533

“This essay returns to such an “old” conflict in the development of international copyright dating back to the signing of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works on 9 September 1886. Translation, a constant “ pierre d’achoppement” in the evolutionary history of the Berne Convention, caused problems from the outset. These returned with full force at the fourth conference for the revision of the Berne Convention in Stockholm on 11-14 June 1967. Described by one participant as “the worst experience in the history of international copyright conventions”, Stockholm marked the culmination of several years’ discussion on the viability of the international copyright regime to accommodate the needs of developing nations.”

2. Brussels, June 1948, page 534

“The Bureaux Internationaux Réunis pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (BIRPI), located in Berne, was the administrative seat from the inception of the treaty, and oversaw revision conferences in Berlin (1908), Rome(1928) and then Brussels (1948).”

subtitle, 2. Brussels, June 1948, page 535

“The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),played an important role in trying to redress a situation in which, in copyright terms, the world emerged from the war “virtually split into two entirely separate and independent parts”. Launched in 1945 as successor to the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC), UNESCO anchored its copyright policy in the 1948 Declaration on Human Rights.”

TIND Comment.-

UNESCO’s strategic deceptive foil of cover as camouflage, in the use of its development of “collectivist” terms for a “Declaration on Human Rights”, won them the approval of their competing proposals for the Self-Ennobling Ones to accept, as the best means of providing for an excuse to convince the victims of designed eugenicist wars, to relegate their ‘freedoms of independence’ to closer cooperation, or corporation, by compelling acquiescence of the general populace to such terms, out of “fear” of a repeat performance of world war, in it being said, that closer cooperation would quell the brutal urges of man.

They, the general populace at large, having no inkling whatsoever, that their compulsion to accept these copywritten terms had been by design, would also have no inkling, that UNESCO’s proposals had the further advantage of completely blinding them into not coming to an understanding that what was copywritten by them in turn, through the Self-Ennobling One’s instruments of deception, (without qualification under registration of ‘noncommital-to-contract’ to copywritten-countries, but merely to record), would effectively provide the means for the Self-Ennobling Ones agencies to ‘collectively’ interfere in the ownership of their intellectual property.

Interfere as superior authorities to a now admitted subordinate position of a registrant, and that through copyright registration ‘without qualificaiton’, it was an admission that registrants were mentally incapable of maintaining their own affairs, in the same way a child lacked the mental capacity to provide for themselves, by demonstrably not understanding the requirements of speaking-up in their own self-interests, as an adult would understand to do, given their circumstances in the world as being functionally independent, and with the recognition that that independence brings, of having the cognition to voice that independence in line with their self-interests and circumstances.

Failure to speak-up, would no doubt reflect on their mental capacities as being immature and in need of assistance by rightly remaining in the charge of an adult parental figure providing for stewardship, to guide and decide what would be in their best interests. Such arrangements, of course, could find their victims intellectual rights the subject of ‘profitable confiscation’ by any number of ‘seemingly’ legitimate means.

The reader to the preceding may remain unperturbed, since as it ought to be well known, any formal relationships entered into, calls for honesty in the interests of fairness for obvious, fair and full disclosure to be provided – for the very reason that genuine ‘fairness’ can only be the basis of authenticity and therefore legitamcy – otherwise, whatsoever arrangements were entered into without full disclosure made known as to the true nature of the operations of the parties to a relationship, would justly render those arrangements ‘null and void’. And that being the case, without having even to speak of ‘the requirements of justice’.

Continuing, page 535

“Prior to the Brussels conference, UNESCO had already noted how copyright was a “barrier” to the “free flow of culture among all the peoples of the world”. In the next few years, UNESCO instigated a number of copyright initiatives culminating in 1952 with The Universal Copyright Convention(UCC).

In sum, the UCC offered an international multilateral convention with lower levels of protection than Berne, thus providing a vehicle for the US to come into the fold of multilateral international copyright agreements. Several specificities in national legislation kept the US outside Berne until 1989; these were primarily the compulsory registration of copyright and the controversial manufacturing requirement, which afforded English-language books copyright protection in the US only if manufacturedon American soil. As a compromise between the formal registration required by US law and the no formalities-Berne framework, the UCC introduced the use of a ©symbol, making it possible for the US and other countries to sign the UCC without having to change their national legislation.”

Source:

Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS :THE BERNE CONVENTIONAND THE 1967 STOCKHOLM DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE REVISITED
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén
http://www.academia.edu/432552/_Colonial_Copyright_Postcolonial_Publics_the_Berne_Convention_and_the_1967_Stockholm_Diplomatic_Conference_Revisited_

United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_International_Bureaux_for_the_Protection_of_Intellectual_Property

World Intellectual Property Organisation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Organization

Multilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world:
The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)
http://www.geneva.quno.info/pdf/WIPO(A4)final0304.pdf

~

We read –

“It is the heir of the League of Nations’ International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.”

Source:

UNESCO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNESCO

Of course, the League of Nations was the first fictitious global corporate institution, ready in waiting, to ‘tranisition’ the people of the world into ‘the idea of global governance’ after the scare tactics of fear in World War One (WWI), soon to be replaced with its permanent successor, after the follow up of WWII to ‘secure’ the establishment of the strategy of fear in bringing about an immovable seat for the readiness of permanent global governance in the form of the United Nations –

League of Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations`

~

In developments further unifying and solidifying the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious interests in stealthly centralizing the means with which to confiscate the physical realm, we read, they have superseded and made obsolete the Universal Copyright Convention for that of the World Trade Organisation’s ‘Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS)’ –

“Since almost all countries are either members or aspiring members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and are thus conforming to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), the UCC has lost significance.”

Source:

Universal Copyright Convention
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Copyright_Convention

Again, we note the understandings reached concerning issues of creative intellectual property rights, when we learn of those acting on behalf of the authors to creative property, organizing their interests through their forums to settle on agreement, when we read, 1. Introduction, page 1, of, ‘Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights in the 1930s’ –

After a series of bilateral agreements the main European book trading countries enacted in cooperation with culturally aware publishers and authors a multilateral agreement, the Berne Convention, in 1886. Although the American states passed the first Inter-American copyright agreement at the same time, the Convention of Montevideo in 1889, it was the Berne Convention, which proofed to be a reliable political instrument in the course of the twentieth century pointing the way ahead when intellectual property rights were institutionalized on a global scale first with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1967 followed by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1994.

Source:

Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property
Rights in the 1930s
Isabella Löhr, University of Leipzig
http://www.ebha.org/ebha2007/pdf/Loehr.pdf

~

But wait, returning to the excellent writings from COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS, those who don’t understand the dangers fictions can pose, are to be further deluded into thinking that they matter, with this –

7. Epilogue: Geneva, October 2007, page 549

“In October 2007, the WIPO Development Agenda was established by the WIPO General Assembly. Scholars have hailed it as a possible new departure for the international intellectual property regime, which has been completely dominated since 1994 by the trade-based rationales of WTO and the infamous Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). TRIPS has eclipsed and helped render the UCC “wholly peripheral to the current international copyright framework” and is targeted for critique by developing nations, echoing concerns already articulated already in 1967. The Stockholm Protocol, a satellite “disconnected from its orbit”, is another instrument relegated to the cemetery where intellectual property texts go to die. Yet, each of these texts is part of the historical foundation from which the Development Agenda draws inspiration.

Although it remains to be seen what clout the Development Agenda will have to redress past wrongs and more recent sins in the power relations between developed and developing nations, it proposes substantial changes in both its general direction and WIPO governance. In 1884, 1885, and 1886 only a handful of nations were present to formulate the original Berne Convention, and they represented a diplomatic elite. Fifty-seven states and more than 400 inter-governmental and non-governmental organisations were present in Stockholm. At present, WIPO counts 184 member nations and over 250 NGOs among those who participate in Geneva deliberations. NGOs now out weigh states in total number, greatly accelerating the presence of civil society in these global arenas, suggesting, to Ruth Okediji, that states are not as important in setting the agenda as they used to be.”

Source:

Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS :THE BERNE CONVENTIONAND THE 1967 STOCKHOLM DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE REVISITED
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén
http://www.academia.edu/432552/_Colonial_Copyright_Postcolonial_Publics_the_Berne_Convention_and_the_1967_Stockholm_Diplomatic_Conference_Revisited_