January 17, 2018

The Cyber War Paradigm

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Thats right, the computer technology is a weapon. Any truth seeking man should be aware that sharing data on the cyber-net even if that data looks “good” is like as not participation in the Hegelian Dialectical process. Thus be aware, and be responsible. Realize that YOU are dealing with intellectual five year olds in adult bodies..

The Vocabulary of Cyber War


At the 39th Joint Doctrine Planning Conference, a semiannual meeting on topics related to military doctrine and planning held in May 2007, a contractor for Booz Allan Hamilton named Paul Schuh gave a short presentation discussing doctrinal issues related to “cyberspace” and the military’s increasing effort to define its operations involving computer networks. Schuh, who would later become chief of the Doctrine Branch at U.S. Cyber Command, argued that military terminology related to cyberspace operations was inadequate and failed to address the expansive nature of cyberspace. According to Schuh, the existing definition of cyberspace as “the notional environment in which digitized information is communicated over computer networks” was imprecise. Instead, he proposed that cyberspace be defined as “a domain characterized by the use of electronics and the electromagnetic spectrum to store, modify, and exchange data via networked systems and associated physical infrastructures.”
These vulnerabilities are “mostly unfamiliar to the kinetic weapons community, and are due to the complexity of the weapons, the dynamic nature of the ‘atmosphere’ of cyberspace, and the difficulty of gathering detailed intelligence about cyber targets.” A discussion on cyber weapon vulnerabilities in the lexicon argues that “the crowded nature of cyberspace and the proliferation of anonymizing technologies can work to both our advantage and disadvantage, in that attribution can be very difficult for both our adversaries and ourselves.” Once a network target has been “accessed and subverted,” the implanted cyber weapon should be “considered like a mine or an improvised explosive device (lED) where there are no longer any delivery considerations for the weapon, but only survivability and transferring of commands and updates.”

Select a term from the following list to read the full definition. All definitions are taken from U.S. Strategic Command (USSTRATCOM) Cyber Warfare Lexicon Version 1.7.6.

Yes indeed they are at war with the domestic populations of the whole planet.

“psychologically conditioned, the public will accept the stages of the New World Order as if they were self-evident.”~HG Wells

“The conscious and intelligent manipulation of the organized habits and opinions of the masses is an important element in democratic society. Those who manipulate this unseen mechanism of society constitute an invisible government which is the true ruling power of our country. …We are governed, our minds are molded, our tastes formed, our ideas suggested, largely by men we have never heard of. This is a logical result of the way in which our democratic society is organized. Vast numbers of human beings must cooperate in this manner if they are to live together as a smoothly functioning society. In almost every act of our daily lives, whether in the sphere of politics or business, in our social conduct or our ethical thinking, we are dominated by the relatively small number of persons…who understand the mental processes and social patterns of the masses. It is they who pull the wires which control the public mind.”

From ‘Propaganda’ by Edward Bernays

  • RattlerRider
  • RattlerRider

    For decades, I have held that there has always been only one form of government; Oligarchy. It masquerades as many different types throughout history, but it always boils down to the rich and powerful calling the shots. Even in Dictatorships, the ‘glorious leader’ can never stand alone, but needs the support of finance and military force. “Government” is a racket, and it has always been. I assert that this is self-evident to those who have shed the shackles of indoctrination to the myths of history.

    The Court Historians and Hired Men of Academia

    “Moreover, the gullibility of many “educated” Americans has been as notable as the mendacity of the “educators.” In Communist Russia and Nazi Germany, as well as in Fascist Italy, and in China, the tyrannical rulers found it necessary to suppress all opposition thought in order to induce the majority of the people to accept the material fed them by official propaganda. But, in the United States, with almost complete freedom of the press, speech, and information down to the end of 1941, great numbers of Americans followed the official propaganda line with no compulsion whatever. This is a remarkable and ominous contrast, especially significant because it has been the “educated” element which has been most gullible in accepting official mythology, taking the population as a
    whole. And this situation has continued since 1945, though of course the public has been less able to get the truth from the avenues of information since V-J Day than it was before Pearl Harbor.

    The opposition to Revisionism—that is, to truth in the premises—stems in part from emotional fixation on the mythology built up after 1937 and in part from personal loyalty to President Roosevelt and the naturally resulting desire to preserve the impeccability of the Roosevelt legend. In regard to the latter, the Roosevelt adulators are much more solicitous about defending their late chief’s foreign policy than they are in upholding the infallibility of his much more creditable domestic program. There is, of course, a powerful vested political interest in perpetuating the accepted mythology about the causes, issues, and results of the second World War, for much of the public policy of the victorious United Nations since 1945 can only make sense and be justified on the basis of
    this mythology.


    Today, this situation has been multiplied many fold. Historians and other social scientists veritably swarmed into the various wartime agencies after 1941, especially the Office of War Information and the Office of Strategic Services. They were intimately associated with the war effort and with the shaping of public opinion to conform to the thesis of the pure and limpid idealism and ethereal innocence of the United States and our exclusive devotion to self-defense and world betterment through the sword. Hence, the opposition of historians and social scientists to truth about the responsibility for the second World War and its obvious results is many times greater than it was in the years following the close of the first World War. Since the war several corps of court historians have volunteered to work to continue the elaboration of official mythology. In addition, the State Department and the Army and Navy have a great swarm of historians dedicated to presenting history as their employers wish it to be written, and at the present time there is a new influx of American historians and social scientists into our ‘Ministry of Truth.’”—H. E. Barnes

  • RattlerRider

    “[…] Anybody who doesn’t believe that we’re trapped hasn’t taken a good look around. We’re trapped in a sort of mutating multinational corporate oligarchy that’s not about to go away. We’re trapped by the limitations of our species. We’re trapped in time. At the same time identity, politics, and ethics have long turned liquid. […] Cyberculture (a meme that I’m at least partly responsible for generating, incidentally) has emerged as a gleeful apologist for this kill-the-poor trajectory of the Republican revolution. You find it all over Wired [an online magazine] – this mix of chaos theory and biological modeling that is somehow interpreted as scientific proof of the need to devolve and decentralize the social welfare state while also deregulating and empowering the powerful, autocratic, multinational corporations. You’ve basically got the breakdown of nation states into global economies simultaneously with the atomization of individuals or their balkanization into disconnected sub-groups, because digital technology conflates space while decentralizing communication and attention. The result is a clear playing field for a mutating corporate oligarchy, which is what we have. I mean, people think it’s really liberating because the old industrial ruling class has been liquefied and it’s possible for young players to amass extraordinary instant dynasties. But it’s savage and inhuman. Maybe the wired elite think that’s hip. But then don’t go around crying about crime in the streets or pretending to be concerned with ethics”~R. U. Sirius (Ken Goffman)


  • RattlerRider

    The U.S. Military’s Plan For Cyborg Soldiers..

    To enforce their definition of peace apparently..

  • RattlerRider

    Anatomy of Controlled Opposition


    This article inquires the nature of the phenomenon named ‘controlled opposition’, aka ‘limited hangout’, which comprises useful idiots in the service of manipulative powers. This phenomenon is known in the history literature and is often quoted by media venues which proclaim to be ‘alternative’, i.e. auxiliary to the state/banking/corporate establishment, and yet may be controlled opposition themselves.

    The Nature of the Beast

    Lenin noted: “The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves”.

    He wasn’t the first to note it or to act accordingly. The dynamic nature of the world necessitates reforms, which in turn challenge the existing power structure, which then needs to survive while the masses hate it for its failures. The establishment is usually much better organized, resourced, educated, experienced and smarter than the masses thus manipulates them by various means, including the installation of establishment-controlled leaders for the alleged opposition. Much of the horrid history of the past century was played by means of controlled oppositions and it still does. (see: “A century of war” by William F. Engdahl)

    There are cases where both opposing sides are pawns on the service of the same manipulative power, which keeps viable working relations with them both, e.g.:

    1. How the USA established and controlled both the illegal USSR and the illegal 3rd kingdom of Germany. Both were illegal in their constitutional-monarchy homelands.

    Both were implemented by means of a brutal usurpation by means of Wall-street money and empowered by means of Anglo-American physical resources and knowledge.

    2. How the USA has equipped both Israel and Iran with devastating nuclear capacities, starting in the late 1950s and empowering it further till date.

    There are cases where the controlled-opposition collaborates with its manipulative master in order to extort a third party. A pertinent example is how the USA and its USSR played the charade of the “cold war” with nuclear MAD(Mutual Assured Destruction),

    in order to extort western Europe and Australia/New-Zealand in to suicidal measures:

    (1) extreme socialism i.e. unpayable debt thus perpetual slavery,

    (2) Feminism i.e. self-genocide by means of overall decline,

    (3) Miscegenation i.e. self-genocide by means of becoming actual 3rd world.

    The excuse was neutralizing communist(i.e. Wall-street instigated and financed) pressures at home and abroad. These 3 suicidal measures only destabilize humanity at all fronts.

    There is more..

  • RattlerRider

    “In this war, which was total in every sense of the word, we have seen many great changes in military science. It seems to me that not the least of these was the development of psychological warfare as a specific and effective weapon.”

    General of the Army Dwight D. Eisenhower, 1945

  • RattlerRider