August 20, 2017

The Putin-Trump Sustainable Development Path Towards World Peace?

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“We are ready to do everything to bring back Russian-US relations on a sustainable development path. This would benefit both the Russian and the US people and would positively impact the overall climate in global affairs, given the particular responsibilities of Russia and the US in maintaining global stability and security,” Putin said.
Source:
President Vladimir Putin received credentials from ambassadors to Russia and commented on the results of the US presidential election
http://www.sputniknews.com/politics/201611091047237528-putin-trump-victory/

Trump of course will follow the wishes of the Global elites insistence that Sustainable Development is fully implemented. That of course is the ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER. The UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment. The Programme of Action on Sustainable Development signed in Rio 1992.. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, The Global Revolution was written in 1968, The Rio Agreement was written in 92, the Global Biodiversity Assessment was written in 1995.  But insufficient progress has been made in population reduction. I have all of these books here I have read them multiple times and fully understand their intent.

Did you Trump voters believe this all would go away? Really?

Apparently I love your children more than you do!

 

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

The way to see that this is happening to you right now, follows the reading –

To: IAHF List
Subject: Cobden Club Memo Circulated at ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER: More Evidence of Genocide Agenda:
From: John Hammell jham@iahf.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:30:02 -0400
http://www.trufax.org/reports/cobden.html
GWS Explanation Return to Biological Manipulation Menu

CONFIDENTIAL
COBDEN CLUBS
Secretariat for World Order
814-631-9959

September 20, 1991

INITIATIVE FOR ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

1. THE PRESSING NEED

a. The time is pressing. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, but insufficient progress has been made in population reduction.

b. Given global instabilities, including those in the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and natural resources, is now absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world population, according to the mid-1970’s recommendation of the Draper Fund, must be immediately affected.

c. The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.

d. The issue is falsely debated between a political and a cultural approach to population and resources, when in fact, faced with stubborn obstruction and day-to-day political expediency which make most of the leaders of the most populous poor countries unreliable, the issue is compulsory cooperation.

e. Compulsory cooperation is not debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist “cultures,” and lacking appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate means delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.

CONFIDENTIAL

f. The U.N. action against Iraq proves conclusively that resolute action on our part can sway other leaders to go along with the necessary program. The Iraq action proves that the aura of power can be projected and sustained and that the wave of history is sweeping forward.

2. PERILS TO BE HEEDED

There is a two-fold opposition which must be eliminated by quick action. There are rumblings among some of the “South” regions, notably Brazil and Malaysia, to thwart the aims of the UNCED Earth Charter and to thwart the international gathering in Brazil in June 1992. There is also the unfortunate vacillation in our own ranks, an argument that the

UNCED leaders have made the agenda “too political” and that the way must first be prepared on a less abrasive cultural basis. We present only the most recent evidence:

* Gilberto Melio Mourao, the Brazilian writer, warned in the August 4 Folha de Sao Paulo that in Munich in 1938, “it won’t against the current type of ecological epidemic, unleashed against our country, which threatens the structure of our cultural, spiritual and political values, and against our very national sovereignty …. Messrs. Chamberlain and Daladier, heads of the governments of England and France, calmly offered the Brazilian Amazon to the Fuehrer.” Hitler reportedly observed that since the Amazon was in South American, the United States would cite the Monroe Doctrine and reject a German occupation of Brazilian territory. Chamberlain and Daladier responded that the proposal had Washington’s backing.

* The U.N. Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) issued its annual report September 16th, declaring, according to BBC, that the liberal free market is not an appropriate model for developing nations. Finance should serve industry, not the other way around, and government has a key role to play in certain sectors of the economy.

3. WHAT THE WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE IS SAYING

* An official of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said September 10th that the Geneva UNCED results were “absolutely a serious setback.” There will be no convention on forests by June 1992 for Brazil. The situation has reached a deadlock. This is the first casualty for the UNCED process.

* A senior advisor on ecological affairs to Britain’s Prince Philip said September 15th that Eco-92 organizer Maurice Strong had “over politicized” the issue of environmentalism and had raised “ridiculously messianic expectations.”

CONFIDENTIAL

THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED:

A. The Security Council of the U.N. led by the Anglo-Saxon Major Nation Powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations that its suffrance on population has ended, that all nations have quotas for population reduction on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military force, when required.

B. The Security Council of the U.N. will inform all nations that outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the Security Council has complete legal, military and econonomic jurisdiction in any region in the world and that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council.

C. The Security Council of the U.N. will take possession of all natural resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be used and preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

D. The Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races and peoples ara equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on suffrance that they cooperate with the Security Council. Decision making, including banking, trade, currency rates and economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major Nations.

E. All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions, and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution. This must be done before any shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.

– – – –

END OF DOCUMENT

“The above document was passed out at the ECO meeting, and we eventually received a copy after almost two years had transpired. We feel that the above document provides sufficient information as to the design of the NWO relative to world population. The telephone number was attempted and found to be associated with Senator Gephardt.”

Everyone of you who advocate against the pseudo environmentalism movement, anti hunting, anti wolf management who voted for Trump voted against yourselves. Not only have you betrayed yourselves you have betrayed those of us who warned you about these things. You voted for the continuation of depopulation Eugenics via Sustainable Development.

With the presidential elections finally over, a question is being asked with increasing frequency: Who did you vote for? Personally, this question aggravates me because it is framed within a distinctly Hegelian framework. This framework consists of the confining dialectics of left vs. right, leftist “liberal” vs. Leftist “conservative”, and, of course, Democrat vs. Republican. The latter of these dialectics is, for me, the most frustrating because there’s no real difference between Republicans and Democrats. None.. Both parties are a philosophical combination of Marxism, Nietzscheanism which is Communitarianism. They keep trading off on the lead role while nothing ever changes except their profit margins. The Party of Prosperity, their own profit benefits greatly from the division they manage while the Corporate Cartel controlling governmental infrastructure keeps sucking the wealth of the earth into their own back pockets, while blocking us little people from those resources.

{There is NO conservative right anything in this country}

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy…It should be able to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which … will still pursue with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”—Carroll Quigley – Tragedy And Hope – 1966..

Been around since 1966. And amazingly most followers of the left versus right Hegelian charade still don’t get it..

The purpose of a two party system is the maintenance of a political cartel. Within such a framework, viable alternatives are overlooked and the same logically bankrupt status quo remains enshrined.

Have a nice day!

Much thanks goes out to There Is No Debt..

 

MY VOTE IS FOR LIFE NOT DEATH! ALL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS US IS DEATH..

 

Share