November 30, 2020

Landless Cattle-less And Sheep-less Husbandry Experts Everywhere

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

“I worry that implementing non-lethal tools only after wolves (or other predators) start killing livestock may be too late–at that point they’ve learned to target livestock. Better to have good husbandry practices in place and prevent depredations to begin with.”—Jeremy Bruskotter – Ohio State University

Buy some land in the NRMs and some cattle and show us that good husbandry “professor” Jeremy… You’re going to fail.. Then what Mr.Professor?

I know I know.. We all need thousand acre barns to herd our cattle and sheep into at night..

So the wolf with more freewill than even a man can roam unmolested by the law of a mans freewill and self determination.. So the urban jungle dwellers can shed no more tears.. Over the precious wolves..

It is amazing watching people with no business experience in a particular business trying to advise the business owners how to make their business better.. For the wolves.. And the best part is these rascals are pseudo wildlife experts too… Albeit no doubt Jeremy “professor” is an efficient page turner..

Just another day on the public lands wolf farm where wildlife and their owners except no responsibilities for the actions of their wild live stock yet they shriek at the private land owners and lawful public lands grazers and shriek about better animal husbandry..

Of course this nonsense is not about saving carnivores it is all about about draconian fascist legal control measures against people who ranch/farm and hunt.. When a society attacks its own food producers that society does not have long to live..

We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.? George Orwell

I have not met a single one of you “anti-wolf management advocates” willing to get down to the nitty gritty and speak to empirical data and facts. It is all this subjective theorizing based on cloistered indoctrination. A very peculiar situation when it is the “Pro wolf management advocates” who are being framed here as those who are lazy uneducated and lacking of moral domestic animal husbandry practices because we fail to outwit nocturnal predators that raid us at night and worse we are censored because according to these professors professing idiocy we have empty substance-less positions for our defense against their outright lies and lunacy. It is blatant and prima facea, and would not stand in even high school debate class. That is the reason they hide in echo chambers chanting their fourth grade nonsense..

Their nonsense would fly well in ‘Politics’ though – wouldn’t it? Yep..

Politics or political thought is a fictitious personally held private belief and nothing more..—ThereIsNoDebt

Notes by ThereIsNoDebt

Etymology of Politics
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=politics
What is BODY POLITIC?
http://thelawdictionary.org/body-politic/
What is BODY CORPORATE?
http://thelawdictionary.org/body-corporate/
~
Definition of Legislature –
“A body of persons having the power to legislate; specifically : an organized body having the authority to make laws for a political unit”
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legislature

Definition of body politic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/body+politic
Note.- A body politic is fictitious in character.
It must be remembered that ‘politics’ deals with affairs of the mind. They are ‘personal opinions’ of how people think we should relate to each other and to which people are entitled to contract or agree with if that is open to them to do so, or just simply ignore. And therefore as opinion, politics or political thought is a fictitious personally held private belief and nothing more.

Definition of Political unit
political unit – a unit with political responsibilities
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/political+unit
Note.- Political units are unable to own land, in fact or in reality, due to their fictitious nature. Their ownership of land is a mere fancy that remains unchallenged, no doubt because they have a monopoly on force. Of which land they ‘claim’ to own, can only be that to be found in the physical world where the living do not dwell. That is why the territorial jurisdiction political units (nations, countries, states, etc.) define legally as being where they are to be found, remains in their definition as, territorial waters, sea bed, continental shelf, and only the subsoil making up the subterranean world.

Another day in the fake imaginations of public lands politicized wolf farmers playing their trivial Political Ponerology of thoughtless pursuits.. Professing idiots in every sense of the word..

If you work 48 hours in 24 hours the wolves won’t kill your sheep says little urbanite Bo professor Peep..

Share