June 24, 2017

Coming To A Public School Near You

Share

Same Private Corporate Owners of U.S. Own Russia

So for more than 2000 years now the Devil huffed and puffed ’till he blew his disguise clean off and stands revealed as Rome…

Russia of course being their backup power in case the U.S. turns on them.. Which has not happened..

From ThereIsNoDebt Appendices;

Countries are and can only be sea states / coastal states –

27th July 2015

Rosja: opublikowano now? wersj? doktryny morskiej pa?stwa
http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/rosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa/sxhk3f

Google translator:

Russia: it published a new version of the doctrine of sea state
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiadomosci.onet.pl%2Fswiat%2Frosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa%2Fsxhk3f&edit-text=

What constitutes the country of The Federation of Russia is given to mean –

July 27 2001

“The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal laws and other legal acts
of the Russian Federation, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as of 1982,
international treaties in the domain of the sea activity and use of the resources and
spaces of the World Ocean shall constitute the legal basis of the Sea Doctrine.”

– I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, 1st paragraph, page 2

Download Source:

SEA DOCTRINE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
for the period till 2020
(approved by the President of the Russian Federation on July 27 2001; Order No. 1387)
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjACahUKEwiw7b77tvvGAhXDa3IKHYXEBSA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcaf.ch%2Fcontent%2Fdownload%2F36021%2F527259%2Ffile%2FBM_Arbatov_07_Doctrine_Sea.pdf&ei=xDO2VbD7OMPXyQOFiZeAAg&usg=AFQjCNFBWyZKmRt0FY_8fouzAMAMbv50ZA&bvm=bv.98717601,d.bGQ

Reference Material:

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO SAY THIS
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/there-is-no-other-way-to-say-this/

~

Having learnt that President Putin of the Federation of Russia has made amendments to the ‘Naval Doctrine of Russia’, known also as the ‘Maritime Doctorine’ or ‘Sea Doctrine’, what is of interest, is whether the amendments made change in any way the definition for the Federation of Russia (Russia) as being –

i) a personally owned private fictitious (copywritten) corporate country in the ownership of the Self-Ennobling Ones, which would be the only significant change of any real meaning, or

ii) whether the pretense of countries being independent from each other continues, although

iii) their definitions and copyright reveal that they most certainly do not represent the interests of people to be found in the physical world of the five senses, but that they are the private intellectual property (creations of the mind) of those who directly created them or had them created indirectly by their representatives

Comparison of :

– the definition for the Russian Federation given by, ‘The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)’, with that of

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the Russian state

~

Definition for the Russian Federation given by, The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)

The Definition of the Russian Federation, paragraph 5 –

“The legal basis for maritime doctrine consists of the Constitution of Russian Federation, federal
laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea of 1982, international treaties in the field of maritime activity, the use of
space resources and the oceans.”

– I. General Provisions, 5th paragraph, page 1

Source:

APPROVED
President
Russian Federation
Vladimir Putin
27 July 2001,
Pr-1387
Maritime Doctrine of Russian Federation 2020
http://www.oceanlaw.org/downloads/arctic/Russian_Maritime_Policy_2020.pdf

Source of Origination:

The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO) –
A Service of the Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans
http://www.oceanlaw.org/

~

Parties and Non-Parties to the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/parties-and-non-parties-los-convention

Text of the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/text-los-convention

~

ROLCO Members –

Members and Leadership of the

Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans

Steering Committee:

Alton Frye
Caitlyn Antrim

Executive Director:

Caitlyn Antrim

Members:

John Bellinger, Arnold and Porter; Legal Adviser, Department of State 2005-09

William Brewer, (retired) General Counsel, NOAA, Representative of the Secretary of Commerce to the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea

David Caron, Dean, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London

Patricia Forkan, President (emeritus) Humane Society International

Alton Frye, Council on Foreign Relations (ret)

Lee A. Kimball, Consultant

John Knauss, Administrator of NOAA and Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, 1989-1993

Edward Miles, Professor emeritus, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington

Thomas R. Pickering, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs 1999-2000, US Representative to the United Nations 1989-1992

RAdm. Horace B. Robertson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), Judge Advocate General of the Navy, 1975-1976

David Rockefeller Jr., Philanthropist

Biliana Cicin-Sain, Professor, School of Marine Affairs, University of Delaware

Harry Scheiber Professor of Law, University of California School of Law; Director, Law of the Sea Institute

William H. Taft, IV, Deputy Secretary of Defense 1984-1989, Legal Adviser, US Department of State 2001-2005

John C. Whitehead, Deputy Secretary of State, 1985-89

Adm. Paul A. Yost USCG (Ret.), Commandant, US Cost Guard 1986-1990

Source:

ROLCO Members
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/rolco-members

~

Additional –

January 10, 2015
Russia Overhauls Military Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/policy/2015/01/10/russia-military-doctrine-ukraine-putin/21441759/

Definition of the Russian Federation relating to the Russian military doctrine, paragraph 3 –

3. The legal basis of the Military Doctrine consists of the Russian
Federation Constitution; the generally recognized principles and norms of
international law and Russian Federation treaties in the field of defence,
arms control, and disarmament; federal constitutional laws; federal laws; and
also statutory legal acts of the Russian Federation president and the Russian
Federation Government.

Source:

Text of newly-approved Russian military doctrine
Text of report by Russian presidential website on 5 February
[“The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation” approved by Russian
Federation presidential edict on 5 February 2010]
http://carnegieendowment.org/files/2010russia_military_doctrine.pdf

____

Definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

Link: Text of the 1982 Convention and 1994 Agreement

Definition of Countries given by the United Nations, from bullet pointed paragraph 6 of the preamble, reads –

Desiring by this Convention to develop the principles embodied in resolution 2749 (XXV) of 17 December 1970 in which the General Assembly of the United Nations solemnly declared inter alia that the area of the seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, as well as its resources, are the common heritage of mankind, the exploration and exploitation of which shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole, irrespective of the geographical location of States,

Source:

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
PART XI OF THE CONVENTION
PREAMBLE
http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm

____

Definition of the Federation of Russia given by the Russian state and government –

30 November 1998,
in agreement with Italy –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation and, when used in a geographical sense means its territory, including internal waters and territorial sea, air space over them as well as exclusive economic zone and continental shelf where the Russian Federation has sovereign rights and exercises jurisdiction in conformity with the international and federal law;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/italy.pdf

27 August 1998
in agreement with the Netherlands –

“the Russian Federation” means its territory as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf as defind in its legislation subject to the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/netherlands.pdf

22 May 2014
in agreement with Malta –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation, when used in geographical sense, means all the territory of the Russian Federation and also its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined according to the UN Convention on the law of the seas (1982);
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/Malta_e.pdf

5 May 2005
in agreement with Lithuania –

the term “the Russian Federation”, when used in the geographical sense, means the territory of the Russian Federation as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined in accordance with the international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/lithuania.pdf

19 January 2009
in agreement with Venezuela –

the term “the Russian Federation (Russia)” means the territory of the Russian Federation and includes its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/venezuela.pdf

Sourced:

Applicable Double Taxation Treaties
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/dta/

SOURCED:

The Russian Government – Federal Taxation Service
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/1.html

International Cooperation
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/

____

From news sources :

Definition of the Russian Federation approved by Vladimir Putin (new Maritime Doctrine) –

26 July, 2015

Paragraph 5:

“It is above all a change of the international situation, the situation in the world and, of course, the strengthening of our country as a maritime power,”

Paragraph 6:

The six regional areas – is the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and Antarctica.

Paragraph 7:

Focuses on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. “Atlantic – due to the fact that in recent times is fairly active development of the North Atlantic Alliance and its approach to our borders, to which, of course, the Russian Federation is your answer,” – said Deputy Prime Minister. “The second point is related to the fact that Crimea and Sevastopol reunited with the Russian Federation, and it is necessary to take measures for speedy integration into the economic activity of the Crimea and Sevastopol. And of course, the restoration of the presence of the Russian navy in the Mediterranean Sea“, – he added.

Paragraph 8:

“As for the Arctic, it is caused by several events,” – continued Rogozin.

“In addition, the Arctic for us – it is a free access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans are not limited by anything. And of course, the very richness of the continental shelf that requires careful attention to the development of” – he said.

Paragraph 9:

Particular emphasis is placed in the Marine doctrine on environmental issues. “Because it is important for us not only to develop wealth, but also to preserve them for future generations,” – said the official.

Paragraph 11:

An important part of the doctrine regard to governance issues of maritime activity. It outlined the role of the Marine Board of the Government, verified the competence of other authorities. So now you can start building a list of all the documents planning of maritime activities of the state.

English translations:

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html&usg=ALkJrhjuubBR_tATb1sy1qjVT7qqrmm4MQ

Primary Sourcing:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

NEW EDITION OF MARITIME DOCUMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

* New definition for the Russian Federation given in 45 page document –

link: the edition of the Maritime Doctrine
http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/uAFi5nvux2twaqjftS5yrIZUVTJan77L.pdf

Source:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

From Russian state sources :

Definition of Russia taken from the minutes for the new Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation –

Russian Federation Marine Doctrine

Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

July 26, 2015 16:00Baltiisk
Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

The meeting took place on board the frigate Admiral of the Soviet Navy Gorshkov. Participants included Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov, and Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov.

* * *

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Colleagues, good afternoon.

We have been updating the Russian Federation’s Marine Doctrine. This very complex document’s main aim is to provide our country with an integral, consistent and effective naval policy that will protect Russia’s interests.

The Doctrine has been drafted and approved. This is a big event for our future navy, and for developing our shipbuilding industry, because the main customer – the navy in this case, and the Defence Ministry – formulate their future needs, and the industry must carry out these tasks. Industry adapts to new tasks depending on the needs formulated.

Let me note that for the first time, the Doctrine also includes provisions of a purely social nature. They cover marine medicine, and provisions for improving the health of sailors and the specialists working in the marine field. This is very important. People need to know that from now on, our strategic documents for developing our country’s fleet and navy will address the social aspect too, and will give people what they expect from their service, as they carry out the tasks that face our country today in this very complex and important area.

Let’s now discuss in more detail the Doctrine’s key provisions. Mr Rogozin, you have the floor.

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin: Thank you.

Mr President,

This new draft of the Russian Federation Marine Doctrine is a fundamental document of key importance, setting out our country’s naval policy. In other words, it is one of our country’s strategic planning documents.

The Russian Government’s Marine Board undertook the document’s drafting, with the navy playing the leading role in this work. In all, 15 federal executive agencies and organisations took part in drafting the new Doctrine.

We proposed making changes to the Marine Doctrine adopted back in 2001 for the period through to 2020 for two reasons: above all, the changing international situation; and, of course, strengthening Russia’s position as a sea power.

The Marine Doctrine covers four functional areas and six regional areas. The four functional areas are naval activity, marine transport, marine science, and mineral resources development. The six regional areas are the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian, and Indian Ocean, and we have added Antarctica, as a fair number of events involving Antarctica have taken place of late and this region is of considerable interest to Russia.

The main focus is on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. The reasons for this are the following. We emphasise the Atlantic because NATO has been developing actively of late and coming closer to our borders, and Russia is of course responding to these developments.

The second reason is that Crimea and Sevastopol have been reunited with Russia and we need to take measures for their rapid integration into the national economy. Of course, we are also restoring Russia’s naval presence in the Mediterranean.

As for the Arctic, several events motivate our decision. One is the growing importance of the North Sea Route. Mr President, I reported to you that we have begun work on building a new fleet of atomic-powered icebreakers. Three new atomic icebreakers will be ready for work accompanying ships along the northern route in 2017, 2019, and 2020. Furthermore, the Arctic also assures us free and unhindered access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Then there are the riches of the continental shelf, the development of which calls for an attentive approach.

The Marine Doctrine pays particular attention to environmental issues too, because it is important for us not only to develop these riches, but also to preserve them for future generations.

The Marine Doctrine contains a new section on shipbuilding. This is to a large extent linked to the fact that over these last 10–15 years, we have developed a shipbuilding industry that in terms of naval shipbuilding is doing work on a scale comparable to what was happening during the Soviet period. As for civilian and commercial shipbuilding, we are taking measures to encourage the establishment of private shipbuilding companies, which have demonstrated successful results.

State management of marine activities is an important part of the Marine Doctrine. This section stresses the role of the Government’s Marine Board and clarifies the powers of the other state agencies. Essentially, once you approved the Marine Doctrine, we will be able to start drafting the whole list of planning documents for our country’s marine activities in the short, medium and long term.

That concludes my report.

Vladimir Putin: Are there any comments or questions?

Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov: Mr President,

Let me thank you for this Marine Doctrine’s timely drafting and approval. This is a timely document. It places responsibility on us for its future implementation, and we have already begun this process.

Vladimir Putin: Mr Sidorov, what is the situation with coordination between the army and the navy?

Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov: Mr President, it is hard to talk about coordination when everything works as single whole and unified command. As far as the tasks before us are concerned, the Baltic Fleet is resolving everything together with the Western Military District’s forces.

Regarding the delimitation of certain powers between the naval chief command and the Western Military District’s command, there is full coordination in this area.

Vladimir Putin: Good, thank you.

Primary Sourcing:

* Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation
http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Primary Sourcing english translation:

* Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Text format:
Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
2015-07-26 16:00:00
Baltiisk
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/copy/50060

~

Additional news reference –

28.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/07/28/antagonizing-interpretation-new-russian-maritime-doctrine-misguided.html

____

Results of Comparisons –

The amendments made for the definition of the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious corporate country of the Russian Federation, under the partial executive direction of their president, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, has at best extended their ‘claims’ of owner-ship to include a greater range of maritime (sea) territory than previously defined, corresponding with accompanying ‘claims’ to those natural resources to be found in the waters (seas), the sea-bed and subsoil of those newly defined maritime territories.

____

Conclusion for Comparisons –

The new definition for the Russian Federation, has partially contravened and violated Natural Laws jurisdictional requirements of exclusivity, insofar as the state and government of the Russian Federation quite rightly continue not to make any claims to having authority over the living, who cannot be ordinarily found to reside in the territories of the dead, and who are not subject to man-made laws where the living are to be found in the physical world of the five senses.

This new definition for the Russian Federation is in accord with the historic and current definitions for states and their countries.

____

Further News – relating to Russia and the Law of the Sea

30 July 2012
Vladimir Putin signs law on the Northern Sea Route
http://www.arctic-info.com/news/30-07-2012/vladimir-putin-signs-law-on-the-northern-sea-route

* July 26, 2015
Russia Revises Navy Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/europe/2015/07/26/russia-revises-navy-doctrine/30705553/

07/26/2015
Vladimir Putin approved a new maritime doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru%2Fdoc%2F2776754&edit-text=

Source:

???????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://kommersant.ru/doc/2776754

July 26 2015
Deputy PM: Putin approves addendums to Sea Doctrine
http://tass.ru/en/russia/810815

26.07.2015
Russian Maritime Doctrine Lays Foundation to New Marine Law
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1025068628.html

26.07.2015
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the approval of a new version of Russia’s Maritime Doctrine, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said Sunday.
http://in.sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1015217869.html

27.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150727/1025103129.html

July 27, 2015
Putin’s Maritime Doctrine: Atlantic is the new Black Sea
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/putins-naval-doctrine-atlantic-is-new.html

July 27, 2015
Changes to Russia’s Naval Doctrine
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/changes-to-russias-naval-doctrine.html

27.07.2015
Russian navy to focus on energy-rich Arctic, Atlantic oceans
http://www.dw.com/en/russian-navy-to-focus-on-energy-rich-arctic-atlantic-oceans/a-18609091

Xinhua, July 27, 2015
Russia updates maritime doctrine, criticizing NATO expansion
http://www.china.org.cn/world/2015-07/27/content_36153005.htm

Jul 27, 2015
New naval doctrine, French MPs in Crimea and another NGO leaves Russia
http://www.russia-direct.org/russian-media/new-naval-doctrine-french-mps-crimea-and-another-ngo-leaves-russia

____

Reference Material

Pilot projects on maritime spatial planning in the Russian Federation
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CEwQFjAIahUKEwjtke6_iYbHAhVGgXIKHXazBbk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbullmaritimeinstitute.com%2Ffulltxt.php%3FICID%3D1158321&ei=fci7Va3fGMaCygP25pbICw&usg=AFQjCNGYuKTApjFitk_5YdYsTdzhXGOnzA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.bGQ

http://www.un.org/ru/publications/pdfs/national%20human%20development%20report%20in%20the%20russian%20federation%202010.pdf

page 93, Chapter 10, The Environmental Component of the National Maritime Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic Ocean,
publication: Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean
edited by Paul Arthur Berkman, Alexander N. Vylegzhanin
https://books.google.pl/books?id=0k26BQAAQBAJ&pg=PR3&dq=Environmental+Security+in+the+Arctic+Ocean+edited+by+Paul+Arthur+Berkman,+Alexander+N.+Vylegzhanin&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMI-KiD8YyGxwIV5sByCh2E8AfR#v=onepage&q=Environmental%20Security%20in%20the%20Arctic%20Ocean%20edited%20by%20Paul%20Arthur%20Berkman%2C%20Alexander%20N.%20Vylegzhanin&f=false

RUSSIAN STRATEGIES
IN THE ARCTIC:
AVOIDING A NEW COLD WAR
Moscow, September 2014
http://www.uarctic.org/media/857300/arctic_eng.pdf

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiyskaya_Gazeta

Reference source:

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
http://www.rg.ru/

Share

The Crown Of The Caesars Passes To The Papacy

The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy –

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

Share

It’s Official Because Ida Lupine Says So

“while the endless boards and agencies{ANY WESTERN STATES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT WHERE WOLVES ARE HARASSING RURAL RESIDENTS} may have great credentials, many of those they cater to{WHERE WOLVES ARE HARASSING RANCHERS-HUNTERS-FARMERS} are lowlifes, who won’t even cooperate with F&W{FALSE FACTS BASED} recommendations”

FACTS CAN BE FALSE

Suppose the scientists behind these recommendations based on those alleged “facts” were corrupt, politically biased, paid to rig these conclusions; and thus directed false science, thus establishing false “Facts”, and overawed the followers of their false facts who are also politically biased; or omitted factual scientific data which would alter the false facts against their final conclusions, or observations by rural ranching hunting public lands multiple users such as myself or others that counter their false facts (as in Effect is the case); That would be enough to render the false facts scientific Verdict by those anti ranching grazing hunting who are evidently totally morally corrupt…. Liars and cheats.. Oops, only lowlifes would point towards omitted factual data contrary to what the Ida’s of this society want to be true even if it is not..

It’s the same old con game over lands and resources wealth just using different words and terms.. Obviously This idiot calling others lowlifes is fooled by the false facts.. In FACT we’ve all been fooled by it.. It is a FACT that I have known false facts and false men, too. It is not a new thing.. It has been going on all down through the ages of our recorded history.. So discerning when scientists or lawyers or judges or politicians assert facts, when false facts are intended is very important when one chooses to go down a path attacking others livelihoods and culture.. If one had a conscience that is.. I’ve discovered the pantheists have no conscience at all..

This Ida from an eastern state has no clue of what she opines about daily.. If she knows more about the western estates several thousand miles from her immediate environment than those of us inhabiting these western estates I suppose we could the assume she is an authority on what is correctly or incorrectly happening or not correctly or incorrectly  happening all over the rest of the earth because she’s omniscient.. She likely knows I haven’t mowed my lawn for a week now..

Signed another Idaho Lowlife that appreciates wolf management because I’ve observed what fully protected populations of wolves did and do.. And what those over protected wolves did was unacceptable and morally disgusting.

Those lowlifes claims coming from her being quite lacking of factual information herself is hilarious when we’ve seen the filth and misinformation coming out of her pie hole for years now.. Along with hiding out in echo chambers where she never has to face contrary factual evidence that proves she is incorrect.. About environmental scientism couched in legal terms and double speak.. The Ida’s of this society have at best a tiny bit of truth buried in hate and misinformation of which she has not the capacity to validate nor prove the difference between pseudo science and real science. Trying to conceptualize definitions of a general nature to assist discovery of the facts as they are and not as she wishes those alleged facts to be are beyond her intellectual capacity..

Thinking they see the light with their eyes wide shut..While calling decent hard working people lowlifes..

No doubt even people on the other side of this issue would like it if Ida shut the hell up…

Guess what Ida? You’re a bitch. And A stupid one at that.

Share

Money vs Currency

Share

What About Confederate Brigadier General Albert Pike’s Statue At D.C. Judicial Square????

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

Share

Who’s Fault Is It? Slave Or Oppressor?

“It has been usual for men to think and to say, “Many men are slaves because one is an oppressor; let us hate the oppressor.” Now, however, there is among an increasing few a tendency to reverse this judgment, and to say, “One man is an oppressor because many are slaves; let us despise the slaves.” The truth is that oppressor and slave are cooperators in ignorance, and, while seeming to afflict each other, are in reality afflicting themselves. A perfect Knowledge perceives the action of law in the weakness of the oppressed and the misapplied power of the oppressor. A perfect Love, seeing the suffering which both states entail, condemns neither. A perfect Compassion embraces both oppressor and oppressed.  He who has conquered weakness, and has put away all selfish thoughts, belongs neither to oppressor nor oppressed. He is free.”  ~James Allen

“Law, not confusion, is the dominating principle in the universe. Justice, not injustice, is the soul and substance of life. And righteousness, not corruption, is the molding and moving force in the spiritual government of the world. This being so, man has but to right himself to find that the universe is right; and during the process of putting himself right, he will find that as he alters his thoughts toward things and other people, things and other people will alter toward him…”  ~As a Man Thinketh,  by James Allen

“The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness…. This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”~Plato, The Republic, bk. 8, sct. 565:
Share

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/the-law/

Category:Political charters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_charters

Given an understanding of the nature of constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense –

28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?

Answer:

(A) a Federal corporation

Sourced:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

~

The incorporation of the United States is entirely lawful. It must be understood that all countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

The following video provides for an excellent explanation of agents in the service of their masters ‘updating’ administratively their owners interests, however, it is misguided in the view it takes on constitutions, in that somehow congressional approval is required to enact legislation –

THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY: the de facto government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VFyQb2kqO0

United States Corporation Company
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-s-corp-company.pdf

Sourced:

Source Documents
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/source-documents/

Once again, what needs to be thoroughly appreciated is this –

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/the-law/

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
(Nature’s Cause As The Only Exceptional Fiction – Cause & Effect)
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

Countries are therefore, The Great Trading Corporations of their Owners –

Read under the title heading, §6. The Great Trading Corporations, on page 7 of,

A treatise on the law of private corporations
by Elliott, Charles B. (Charles Burke), 1861-1935; Abbott, Howard S. (Howard Strickland), 1864-1944
Published 1911
https://archive.org/details/onlawofprivateco00elli

(It can now be seen that the word country is synonymous with the word corporation)

Of course, for any opinions taken from whomever they originate with, on page 10 under the title heading, §8. The juristic person, ‘the juristic person’ will always remain a fiction attaching itself to the fictitious jurisdictional territory belonging to the Owners of a personally owned private fictitious trading corporate country as a business, regardless of the wishful thinking of mere respected opinion. Opinion being of course the fictitious imaginings of an individual, whether or not that fiction is shared by others.

For the ‘juristic person’ to attach to those to be found in the physical world under the authority of ‘true’ Natural Law and its true Rule of Law, requires their ‘membership’ to the traditions-of-men whose traditions are, of course, merely fictions; and that would require individuals to ‘knowingly’ consent to membership.

‘knowing consent’ necessitates ‘full-disclosure’ for there to be legitimacy in not falling foul of conditions that nullify and void (null and void) any arrangements entered into without it –

PUBLIC SERVICE, COMMON SENSE AND THE LAW – PART I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/08/20/public-service-common-sense-and-the-law-part-i/

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
(Nature’s Cause As The Only Exceptional Fiction – Cause & Effect)
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

~

Given an appreciation of the personally owned private corporate nature of countries, as they should quite rightly be understood, the necessity of the US representatives presence in London to secure agreement with HM Government, with regards to social security arrangements, becomes clearer –

Statutory Instruments 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY – The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/made

* [2] British parliament to look into Prince Charles’s veto power over laws
https://youtu.be/M_HnmyyOzus

When taken in their proper ‘full-context’, the informations that are required reading, concerning Prince Charles’ veto powers, can be found under the subtitled heading, SEQUENCE OF DOING BUSINESS USING WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS AS CONTRACTS, to be found part way down the document –

THE BUSINESS OF KNOWING YOUR PLACE
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/04/05/the-business-of-knowing-your-place/

Note.-

The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.

Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

Note.-

* Lawful precedes legal, and therefore the requirements of lawfulness must be met first for legality to proceed.

Of documentary peonage

Definition of Peonage

Peonage is a type of involuntary servitude

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peon

AGAIN AND AGAIN UNTIL YOU GET IT!!

The incorporation of the United States is entirely lawful. It must be understood that all countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.

Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –

“IT IS A PRIVATE BUSINESS.. THE OWNERS CAN REDIRECT ANY ASPECT OF THEIR LAW/LEGALESE OR FUNDS ANYWAY THEY PLEASE BECAUSE THEIR POLITICAL CHARTER COTUS GIVES THEM THE FREEDOM YOU SUBJECTS FANTASIZE ABOUT..”—RR

A great debt of gratitude is warranted here for the best ongoing discovery of truth on the internet by ThereIsNoDebt..

Share

Wolf Programme Had Support From The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit

Or Obviously The Wolf Programme Had Permission From The President Himself Of The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit..

Who has political authority to bypass congress on domestic issues? The issue I’m thinking about would be the wolf reintroduction program using 45-60 million of funds the federal employees and the agency USFWS apparently used to get the reintro done.. So it’s simple, they had the go ahead from a powerful member of the Clinton Administration, probably William J. Clinton himself..

Maybe under some war powers provision.. Some technicality that has been overlooked. There’s probably a signed approval someplace.. The trick is finding it. There might also be some International Treaty implications as well.. The introduction would be under the implementation of The United Nations Environmental Policies Global Biodiversity Assessment being implemented, yet guess what congress never approved that idea either.. Nor has the congress approved the Agenda 21 Programme of Action either but it is being implemented..

The wolf program is part of that environmental philosophy all of these nations agreed to at the U.N.. When they agreed to go along with the United Nations Environmental Policies.. Congress isn’t investigating this because they don’t want to, and because they don’t have the political authority to go get whoever did approve it..Because it is isn’t illegal.. These powerful people don’t owe the subjects any explanations.. And knowing how these governmental pecking order business deals go down there is a paper trail permitting this wolf programme to proceed. So keep squeaking about alleged unconstitutional actions, which are highly unlikely or get off your not interested in real researching asses and find the correct paper trail.. I bet you a president signed it..

“the process to restore wolves to Yellowstone went surprisingly smoothly. Early U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service work, combined with the vision of National Park Service (NPS) Director William Penn Mott, the quiet leadership of Yellowstone Superintendent Robert Barbee, the detailed planning of the Recovery Team, support from the Clinton administration and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, and final implementation by Edward Bangs and Steven Fritts of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with big assists from Yellowstone planners John Varley and Wayne Brewster, were the reasons for the success. Michael Finley was park superintendent when reintroduction occurred. Public support was significant, truly a ground swell of grassroots efforts from a variety of sources (The Wolf Fund and Defenders of Wildlife both at the forefront, plus many others). It is hard to imagine how such a controversial program achieved the success it did. Behind the scenes, there were many others, most notably Norman Bishop, an NPS employee who worked on his own time to educate the public about restoration and why to support it.”
https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/ys-24-1-wolf-restoration-in-yellowstone-reintroduction-to-recovery.htm

Congress Approved Wolf Reintroduction first in 1973 and second in 1982.. Via the ESA.. So perhaps Nixon is the president that approved it..Also somebody in that power structure had the political authority to authorize the use of the $45-60 million$..  Proof, no investigations no jail time nothing.. Because they made it legal. Lawyers do that, make things legal as they go..

Reintroduction Of The Grey Wolf – The Battle Over The Future Of Endangered Species Policies
http://aglawjournal.wordpress.drake.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2016/09/agVol05No2-Cook.pdf

Code Of Federal Regulations
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title50-vol2/xml/CFR-2016-title50-vol2-sec17-40.xml

Share

The United Nations Is A Privately Owned Corporation

United Nations –

“United Nations
A privately held company in New York, NY. ”

http://www.manta.com/c/mmgxyf3/united-nations

Headquarters of the United Nations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

A privately owned corporation is rewilding the lands on this landmass.. I bet that is not a good idea..

I bet they intend to make a killing on the deal…

 

Share