November 25, 2017

Government 101

DO YOU REALLY WANT OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE MIND CONTROLLED IDIOTS DECIDING WHATS BEST FOR YOU OR YOUR IMMEDIATE ENVIRONMENT?

Share

Mind Control And Physical Manipulation U.S. Patents..

So the TV, the lap top, the PC, video games… As in everything the enemy does they first notify you of what they’re going to do.. To YOU..
Patents by Inventor Hendricus G. Loos

Hendricus G. Loos has filed for patents to protect the following inventions. This listing includes patent applications that are pending as well as patents that have already been granted by the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO).

  • Patent number: 6506148
    Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 1, 2001
    Date of Patent: January 14, 2003
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Publication number: 20020188164
    Abstract: Physiological effects have been observed in a human subject in response to stimulation of the skin with weak electromagnetic fields that are pulsed with certain frequencies near ½ Hz or 2.4 Hz, such as to excite a sensory resonance. Many computer monitors and TV tubes, when displaying pulsed images, emit pulsed electromagnetic fields of sufficient amplitudes to cause such excitation. It is therefore possible to manipulate the nervous system of a subject by pulsing images displayed on a nearby computer monitor or TV set. For the latter, the image pulsing may be imbedded in the program material, or it may be overlaid by modulating a video stream, either as an RF signal or as a video signal. The image displayed on a computer monitor may be pulsed effectively by a simple computer program. For certain monitors, pulsed electromagnetic fields capable of exciting sensory resonances in nearby subjects may be generated even as the displayed images are pulsed with subliminal intensity.
    Type: Application
    Filed: June 1, 2001
    Publication date: December 12, 2002
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 6238333
    Abstract: Apparatus and method for remote manipulation of nervous systems by the magnetic dipole field of a rotating bar magnet. Reliance on modulation of spontaneous spiking patterns of sensory nerve receptors, and exploitation of a resonance mechanism of certain neural circuits, allows the use of very weak magnetic fields. This, together with the large magnetic moments that can be obtained with a permanent bar magnet, makes it possible to effectively manipulate the nervous system of a subject over a distance of several hundred meters, using a small portable battery-powered device. The method can be used in law enforcement for standoff situations.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 10, 1999
    Date of Patent: May 29, 2001
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 6167304
    Abstract: Apparatus and method for manipulating the nervous system of a subject by applying to the skin a pulsing external electric field which, although too weak to cause classical nerve stimulation, modulates the normal spontaneous spiking patterns of certain kinds of afferent nerves. For certain pulse frequencies the electric field stimulation can excite in the nervous system resonances with observable physiological consequences. Pulse variability is introduced for the purpose of thwarting habituation of the nervous system to the repetitive stimulation, or to alleviate the need for precise tuning to a resonance frequency, or to control pathological oscillatory neural activities such as tremors or seizures. Pulse generators with stochastic and deterministic pulse variability are disclosed, and the output of an effective generator of the latter type is characterized.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 17, 1999
    Date of Patent: December 26, 2000
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 6091994
    Abstract: Method and apparatus for manipulating the nervous system by imparting subliminal pulsative cooling to the subject’s skin at a frequency that is suitable for the excitation of a sensory resonance. At present, two major sensory resonances are known, with frequencies near 1/2 Hz and 2.4 Hz. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance causes relaxation, sleepiness, ptosis of the eyelids, a tonic smile, a “knot” in the stomach, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency used. The 2.4 Hz resonance causes the slowing of certain cortical activities, and is characterized by a large increase of the time needed to silently count backward from 100 to 60, with the eyes closed. The invention can be used by the general public for inducing relaxation, sleep, or sexual excitement, and clinically for the control and perhaps a treatment of tremors, seizures, and autonomic system disorders such as panic attacks.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: August 31, 1998
    Date of Patent: July 18, 2000
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 6081744
    Abstract: Apparatus and method for manipulating the nervous system of a subject through afferent nerves, modulated by externally applied weak fluctuating electric fields, tuned to certain frequencies such as to excite a resonance in neural circuits. Depending on the frequency chosen, excitation of such resonances causes in a human subject relaxation, sleepiness, sexual excitement, or the slowing of certain cortical processes. The electric field used for stimulation of the subject is induced by a pair of field electrodes charged to opposite polarity and placed such that the subject is entirely outside the space between the field electrodes. Such configuration allows for very compact devices where the field electrodes and a battery-powered voltage generator are contained in a small casing, such as a powder box. The stimulation by the weak external electric field relies on frequency modulation of spontaneous spiking patterns of afferent nerves.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: July 17, 1998
    Date of Patent: June 27, 2000
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 6017302
    Abstract: In human subjects, sensory resonances can be excited by subliminal atmospheric acoustic pulses that are tuned to the resonance frequency. The 1/2 Hz sensory resonance affects the autonomic nervous system and may cause relaxation, drowsiness, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise acoustic frequency near 1/2 Hz used. The effects of the 2.5 Hz resonance include slowing of certain cortical processes, sleepiness, and disorientation. For these effects to occur, the acoustic intensity must lie in a certain deeply subliminal range. Suitable apparatus consists of a portable battery-powered source of weak subaudio acoustic radiation. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or sexual arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of insomnia, tremors, epileptic seizures, and anxiety disorders.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: October 31, 1997
    Date of Patent: January 25, 2000
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 5995954
    Abstract: A method and apparatus for an electronic artificial neural network, which serves as an associative memory that has a complete set of N-dimensional Hadamard vectors as stored states, suitable for large N that are powers of 2. The neural net has nonlinear synapses, each of which processes signals from two neurons. These synapses can be implemented by simple passive circuits comprised of eight resistors and four diodes. The connections in the neural net are specified through a subset of a group that is defined over the integers from 1 to N. The subset is chosen such that the connections can be implemented in VLSI or wafer scale integration. An extension of the Hadamard memory causes the memory to provide new Hadamard vectors when these are needed for the purpose of Hebb learning.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: March 18, 1992
    Date of Patent: November 30, 1999
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 5935054
    Abstract: The invention pertains to influencing the nervous system of a subject by a weak externally applied magnetic field with a frequency near 1/2 Hz. In a range of amplitudes, such fields can excite the 1/2 sensory resonance, which is the physiological effect involved in “rocking the baby”. The wave form of the stimulating magnetic field is restricted by conditions on the spectral power density, imposed in order to avoid irritating the brain and the risk of kindling. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or arousal, and clinically for the control of tremors, seizures, and emotional disorders.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 7, 1995
    Date of Patent: August 10, 1999
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 5899922
    Abstract: Apparatus and method for manipulating the nervous system of a subject through afferent nerves, modulated by an externally applied weak electric field. The field frequency is to be chosen such that the modulation causes excitation of a sensory resonance. The resonances found so far include one near 1/2 Hz which affects the autonomic nervous system, and a resonance near 2.4 Hz that causes slowing of certain cortical processes. Excitation of the 1/2 Hz autonomic resonance causes relaxation, sleepiness, ptosis of the eyelids, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise frequency used. The weak electric field for causing the excitation is applied to skin areas away from the head of the subject, such as to avoid substantial polarization current densities in the brain. Very weak fields suffice for bringing about the physiological effects mentioned. This makes it possible to excite sensory resonances with compact battery powered devices that have a very low current consumption.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: November 14, 1997
    Date of Patent: May 4, 1999
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 5800481
    Abstract: In man, autonomic and cortical resonances of the nervous system can be excited by inducing subliminal heat pulses in the skin by means of a resistive heat patch, laser, heat lamp, or microwave radiation, or through a slow air jet that carries a small periodic fluctuation in temperature. Deeply subliminal skin temperature oscillations of frequency near 1/2 Hz induced in a subject by any of these means cause sleepiness, drowziness, relaxation, a tonic smile, ptosis of the eyelids, a tense feeling, sudden loose stool, or sexual excitement, depending on the precise pulse frequency used. For certain higher frequencies, the induced subliminal skin temperature oscillations cause fractured thought and a slowing of certain cortical processes. The method and apparatus can be used by the general public as an aid to relaxation, sleep, or arousal, and clinically for the control and perhaps treatment of tremors, seizures, and emotional disorders.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: December 28, 1995
    Date of Patent: September 1, 1998
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 5782874
    Abstract: Apparatus and method for manipulating the nervous system of a subject through afferent nerves, modulated by externally applied weak fluctuating electric fields, tuned to certain frequencies such as to excite a resonance in certain neural circuits. Depending on the frequency chosen, excitation of such resonances causes relaxation, sleepiness, sexual excitement, or the slowing of certain cortical processes. The weak electric field for causing the excitation is applied to skin areas away from the head of the subject, such as to avoid substantial polarization current densities in the brain. By exploiting the resonance phenomenon, these physiological effects can be brought about by very weak electric fields produced by compact battery-operated devices with very low current assumption. The fringe field of doublet electrodes that form a parallel-plate condenser can serve as the required external electric field to be administered to the subject’s skin.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: January 24, 1997
    Date of Patent: July 21, 1998
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 4475927
    Abstract: A method and system for the abatement of fog in a designated air space over an aircraft approach zone and runway, consisting of gapped air jets laden with electrically charged droplets of low mobility, a ground corona guard in the form of a shallow water-and-oil basin, and a charged-collector-drops emitting device on the ground, arranged in such a manner that the low-mobility charged droplets blown aloft by the air jets form a virtual electrode suspended at appropriate height above the ground, toward which the oppositely charged high-mobility collector drops move, thereby collecting the neutral fog drops in their paths. The perforation ratio of the gapped air jet array is chosen such that the wind flux which penetrates the jet array is substantially equal to the entrainment flux at the lee side of the jets, thereby providing for a virtual canopy over the spatial region in which the fog is to be abated.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: March 3, 1981
    Date of Patent: October 9, 1984
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 4361403
    Abstract: A method for measurement of the size distribution of particles suspended in a gas or in a liquid. The particle suspension is illuminated by a collimated beam of colored light, which is produced by passing a collimated beam of substantially white light through a spectral filter which has spatial sections of narrow spectral passband in the blue, green and red. Part of the light scattered by the particles is collected by a lens and is passed through a spatial filter placed in the focal plane of the lens. The light transmitted by the filter is measured by a photodetector. The photodetector output is measured as different spatial filters are switched in place. A computer, microprocessor, or analog device acts on the measured values and produces the particle size distribution as an output. The data reduction algorithm consists of a linear transformation of the measured data vector, followed by the construction of a linear combination of basis functions for the size distribution.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: January 21, 1980
    Date of Patent: November 30, 1982
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 4338030
    Abstract: A method for measurement of the size distribution of particles suspended in a gas or in a liquid. The particle suspension is illuminated by a collimated beam of substantially white light. Part of the light scattered by the particles is collected by a lens and is passed through a slit placed in the focal plane of the lens. The light transmitted by the slit is made to pass through a dispersive element which causes spectral decomposition of the processed light in a direction perpendicular to the slit. A spatial filter is placed in the exit plane of the dispersive element; the transmittance of this filter is a function of position on the filter. The light transmitted by the filter is measured by a photodetector. The photodetector output is measured as different spatial filters are switched in place. A computer, microprocessor, or analog device acts on the measured values and produces the particle size distribution as an output.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: March 18, 1980
    Date of Patent: July 6, 1982
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos
  • Patent number: 4245909
    Abstract: A method for measurement of the size distribution of particles suspended in a gas or in a liquid. The particle suspension is illuminated by a collimated beam of nearly monochromatic light. Part of the light scattered by the particles is collected by a lens and is passed through a spatial filter placed in the focal plane of the lens. The light transmitted by the filter is measured by a photodetector. The photodetector output is measured as different spatial filters are switched in place. A computer, microprocessor, or analog device acts on the measured values and produces the particle size distribution as an output. The data reduction algorithm consists of a linear transformation of the measured data vector, followed by the construction of a linear combination of basis functions for the size distribution. The spatial filters consist of transparencies with non-uniform transmittance functions.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: June 26, 1978
    Date of Patent: January 20, 1981
    Inventor: Hendricus G. Loos

ANYONE ELSE HAD ANY ORIGINAL THOUGHTS LATELY?

Share

Transmission Of Radiation Wasting Disease

So the cows grazed.. The elk grazed, the deer grazed.. The people drank and ate.. And we all enjoyed various chronic wasting away illnesses… Never a word from those eco system saviors out there.. What or who transmitted the chronic wasting disease to the deer? And to the elk? What or who transmitted the mad cow disease to the cows? Because if I wanted to depopulate the earth of life especially direct drivers=people I’d be transmitting diseases and other problems into everything they eat… EVERYTHING…

 

 

 

Share

Obviously Climate Change Caused California Fires

Share

Quote Of The Day

KNOW THAT MOST MEN, INCLUDING THOSE AT EASE WITH PROBLEMS OF THE GREATEST COMPLEXITY, CAN SELDOM ACCEPT EVEN THE SIMPLEST AND MOST OBVIOUS TRUTH IF IT WOULD OBLIGE THEM TO ADMIT THE FALSITY OF CONCLUSIONS WHICH THEY HAVE DELIGHTED IN EXPLAINING TO COLLEAGUES, PROUDLY TAUGHT TO OTHERS, AND WHICH THEY HAVE WOVEN, THREAD BY THREAD, INTO THE FABRIC OF THEIR LIVES— Leo Tolstoy

This be the ‘New World’ of the Homo Vishnu Ignoramus –
Adulterated Humanoid sheep who bear no witness even to their own origins living in their perverted programmed delusions of myths fairy tales and backwards words and terms…

KNOW THAT MOST MEN DO NOT EVEN KNOW THAT THEY ARE MEN…

Share

The Religious Prophets Of Scientism

Actors that don’t believe the lies they preach… Because they know whats up and lying to keep YOU from discovering the truth is their job. The priest, politician, lawyer and scientist are the personification of falsehood..

Share

Weather Modification Programs, Problems, And Potential – 95th Congress 2d Session

Interesting how Climate Change enviro gurus never discuss Geoengineering “climate engineering” “solar radiation management”, “stratospheric aerosol geoengineering… As harmful to the environment… Oh no it’s my pop gun, my fireplace, my exhaust pipe and the ranchers cattle farting…it’s over population of man they say… It’s “over populated” mankind’s activities except the biggest proponents of “over population” wealthy elite funded scientific Weather Modification…

 

Wait, wait a minute… No doubt about it.. It’s leftist environmentalists bloviating about nothing… You know, spewing climate change hot air..

Share

Admiralty “Law” In America____ Why?

U.S. Citizens Are Still Under The International Rule of the Crown And Have Always Been.

ADMIRALTY___WHY?

Yes, the admiralty Rules are all in Title 28 now. I have all the original admiralty rules and the books on where they all are now. They are horrendously large in volume. To start with read Southworth Machinery Co. Inc vs F/V Corey Pride, et al 1993 AMC 2261 wherein they say UCC is a source of Admiralty law and UCC is considered a source for federal admiralty law. That will get you going. Now pull Commentaries on American Law by James kent Vol 1 Fourth Ed. This explains the admiralty jurisdiction in the federal courts. Pull the Tulane Law Review Vol 55 1980 1981 Titled Admiralty-Procedure for maritime Action in Rem found Unconstitutional.

After reading these then go to The United States Code Annotated Title 28 Federal Rules of Civil

Procedure Rules 77 to end. In there is Index to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure first vol of this title starting on page 109 There you have three columns

Former admiralty Rules Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Fed. Rules of Appl. Proc.

This is Admiralty rule 1 to 60 This is present rules that they are This is where appl. rule is

Then pull US CODE ANNOTATED Title 28 1989 Cumulative Annual Pocket Part that has

amendments through January 1, 1989 For close of notes see page 111

Ok, now we get to the meat of in depth. Go pull IRC regs 301.7401-1 authorization. Yes it is under admiralty under the commercial nature of Maritime. As I have stated over and over revenue is straight admiralty. This will be supported by pulling 3 How. iii Index of Principal Matters page 807. That leads you to 10 How. v Rules of Court two pages, then 13 How. vi in the Index starts with abatement pages 695, 696 Then 17 How. vi under abatement Account Admiralty one page, then 21 How 10 Admiralty Rule, then 1 Black 6 General Rules two pages 6 & 7, then 7 Wall general Rule December 1868, then 13 Wall xii supplementary Rules of Practice of admiralty at xii, xiii & xiv, then 103 U.S. xiii Rules of Practice in Admiralty, 112 U.S. 743 Appendix Amendment to Rules

Supreme Court of The United States 1882 Rules in Admiralty, then 130 U.S. 705 Appendix another amendment, then 160 U.S. 693 1895 Amendment, then 210 U.S. 544 is the real deal Index to Admiralty Rules. This gives every admiralty Rule made. On page 544 it states Rules of Practice for the Courts of the United States in Admiralty and Maritime Jurisdiction, on the Instance side of the Court, in Pursuance of the Act of the 23d of August , 1842, Chapter 188, 5 stat 516. This ends on page 711 Now pull 281 U.S. 773 the Amended Rules becoming effective October 1, 1930 Then more amendments in 286 U.S. 572 May 1932, then 307 U.S. 653 More Amendments to page 659 effective May 22, 1939, then 316 U.S. 716 Amendments May 4, 1942. Now I am skipping some more amending and going to 308 U.S. 1019 Appendix Containing Amendments to Rules of Civil Procedure for the United States District Courts–Rules of Practice in Admiralty and Maritime Cases and General Orders in Bankruptcy and the Official Forms Prescribed by the Supreme Court of The United States Effective July 19, 1961. this ends at page 1041. Now all this will conclusively prove that the Civil Rules Title 28 have always been Admiralty Rules. More proof? Now pull Federal Rules Decisions Vol 34 Opinions, decisions and Rulings involving the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Starting on page 331 going to page 370. Now on page 369 and 370 they show the

disposition of Admiralty Rules into Title 28. Here is some of the Rules that are admiralty. I give you only some of the admiralty Rule then the Title 28 Rule

Admiralty Rule Title 28 Rule

7 54d

8 Supplemental rule E6

20 69-71

21 8 & Supp. R. C2

23 15

27 12 & 56

28 55 & 60

29 12 f 26 et sec

35 11 & 12f

44 83

441/2 16

46 43 and 28 usc 753

48 7a,8d, and 12a & b

56 14

58 56

59 57

You starting to get the picture? Now go to the FRD and pull Vol 39 which is dated 1966 when they really dumped it in your lap On the Amendment page it states Transmitted to Congress Feb, 28, 1966 Effective date of Amendments: July 1, 1966; see Orders pages 183, 203, 18 USCA 3771, and 28 USCA 2072 2073

For preliminary Draft of Proposed Rules see 34 FRD 325.

Now I am only a quarter through what you all need to know. But this will prove beyond any doubt that we have all been under Admiralty Rules from the start. Why ? Because we are still under the International Rule of the Crown and have always been. Need I say more? Go back and remember what you read in the Cory Pride case about UCC and Admiralty law which is the International law merchant. If that isn’t bad, read 98 FRD 374. Any one now want to challenge that all the above is made up and admiralty isn’t working on you today as we speak?

The Informer

October 1994

Because citizens are property that is why…

Share

Jane Russell Had A Gun

Share

Hotter Than Normal Fires Defy Law Of Physics

I wouldn’t count any cause out.. Especially chemical components in all manufacturing materials used in houses and vehicles.. Keep in mind the leftists-especially the environmentalist alleged conservationist gurus are calling this Climate Change.. It’s just climate change..

Share