July 13, 2020

Donald Trump Predictive Programming

Share

Another “Mysterious” Clinton Associated Death: Deja Vu All Over Again

*Editor’s Note*For those with understanding, note that this article states that a person was caught, “attempting to steal and smuggle “33” children…”

“As we know, Hillary has ties to convicted sex offender and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. In addition, Hillary was involved in the NGO run by Laura Silsby, the former director of the The New Life Children’s Refuge. She was caught attempting to steal and smuggle 33 children from Haiti, most of whom weren’t even orphans at the time:”<<<Read More>>>

Share

The Putin-Trump Sustainable Development Path Towards World Peace?

“We are ready to do everything to bring back Russian-US relations on a sustainable development path. This would benefit both the Russian and the US people and would positively impact the overall climate in global affairs, given the particular responsibilities of Russia and the US in maintaining global stability and security,” Putin said.
Source:
President Vladimir Putin received credentials from ambassadors to Russia and commented on the results of the US presidential election
http://www.sputniknews.com/politics/201611091047237528-putin-trump-victory/

Trump of course will follow the wishes of the Global elites insistence that Sustainable Development is fully implemented. That of course is the ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER. The UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment. The Programme of Action on Sustainable Development signed in Rio 1992.. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, The Global Revolution was written in 1968, The Rio Agreement was written in 92, the Global Biodiversity Assessment was written in 1995.  But insufficient progress has been made in population reduction. I have all of these books here I have read them multiple times and fully understand their intent.

Did you Trump voters believe this all would go away? Really?

Apparently I love your children more than you do!

 

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

The way to see that this is happening to you right now, follows the reading –

To: IAHF List
Subject: Cobden Club Memo Circulated at ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER: More Evidence of Genocide Agenda:
From: John Hammell jham@iahf.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:30:02 -0400
http://www.trufax.org/reports/cobden.html
GWS Explanation Return to Biological Manipulation Menu

CONFIDENTIAL
COBDEN CLUBS
Secretariat for World Order
814-631-9959

September 20, 1991

INITIATIVE FOR ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

1. THE PRESSING NEED

a. The time is pressing. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, but insufficient progress has been made in population reduction.

b. Given global instabilities, including those in the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and natural resources, is now absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world population, according to the mid-1970’s recommendation of the Draper Fund, must be immediately affected.

c. The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.

d. The issue is falsely debated between a political and a cultural approach to population and resources, when in fact, faced with stubborn obstruction and day-to-day political expediency which make most of the leaders of the most populous poor countries unreliable, the issue is compulsory cooperation.

e. Compulsory cooperation is not debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist “cultures,” and lacking appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate means delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.

CONFIDENTIAL

f. The U.N. action against Iraq proves conclusively that resolute action on our part can sway other leaders to go along with the necessary program. The Iraq action proves that the aura of power can be projected and sustained and that the wave of history is sweeping forward.

2. PERILS TO BE HEEDED

There is a two-fold opposition which must be eliminated by quick action. There are rumblings among some of the “South” regions, notably Brazil and Malaysia, to thwart the aims of the UNCED Earth Charter and to thwart the international gathering in Brazil in June 1992. There is also the unfortunate vacillation in our own ranks, an argument that the

UNCED leaders have made the agenda “too political” and that the way must first be prepared on a less abrasive cultural basis. We present only the most recent evidence:

* Gilberto Melio Mourao, the Brazilian writer, warned in the August 4 Folha de Sao Paulo that in Munich in 1938, “it won’t against the current type of ecological epidemic, unleashed against our country, which threatens the structure of our cultural, spiritual and political values, and against our very national sovereignty …. Messrs. Chamberlain and Daladier, heads of the governments of England and France, calmly offered the Brazilian Amazon to the Fuehrer.” Hitler reportedly observed that since the Amazon was in South American, the United States would cite the Monroe Doctrine and reject a German occupation of Brazilian territory. Chamberlain and Daladier responded that the proposal had Washington’s backing.

* The U.N. Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) issued its annual report September 16th, declaring, according to BBC, that the liberal free market is not an appropriate model for developing nations. Finance should serve industry, not the other way around, and government has a key role to play in certain sectors of the economy.

3. WHAT THE WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE IS SAYING

* An official of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said September 10th that the Geneva UNCED results were “absolutely a serious setback.” There will be no convention on forests by June 1992 for Brazil. The situation has reached a deadlock. This is the first casualty for the UNCED process.

* A senior advisor on ecological affairs to Britain’s Prince Philip said September 15th that Eco-92 organizer Maurice Strong had “over politicized” the issue of environmentalism and had raised “ridiculously messianic expectations.”

CONFIDENTIAL

THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED:

A. The Security Council of the U.N. led by the Anglo-Saxon Major Nation Powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations that its suffrance on population has ended, that all nations have quotas for population reduction on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military force, when required.

B. The Security Council of the U.N. will inform all nations that outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the Security Council has complete legal, military and econonomic jurisdiction in any region in the world and that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council.

C. The Security Council of the U.N. will take possession of all natural resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be used and preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

D. The Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races and peoples ara equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on suffrance that they cooperate with the Security Council. Decision making, including banking, trade, currency rates and economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major Nations.

E. All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions, and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution. This must be done before any shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.

– – – –

END OF DOCUMENT

“The above document was passed out at the ECO meeting, and we eventually received a copy after almost two years had transpired. We feel that the above document provides sufficient information as to the design of the NWO relative to world population. The telephone number was attempted and found to be associated with Senator Gephardt.”

Everyone of you who advocate against the pseudo environmentalism movement, anti hunting, anti wolf management who voted for Trump voted against yourselves. Not only have you betrayed yourselves you have betrayed those of us who warned you about these things. You voted for the continuation of depopulation Eugenics via Sustainable Development.

With the presidential elections finally over, a question is being asked with increasing frequency: Who did you vote for? Personally, this question aggravates me because it is framed within a distinctly Hegelian framework. This framework consists of the confining dialectics of left vs. right, leftist “liberal” vs. Leftist “conservative”, and, of course, Democrat vs. Republican. The latter of these dialectics is, for me, the most frustrating because there’s no real difference between Republicans and Democrats. None.. Both parties are a philosophical combination of Marxism, Nietzscheanism which is Communitarianism. They keep trading off on the lead role while nothing ever changes except their profit margins. The Party of Prosperity, their own profit benefits greatly from the division they manage while the Corporate Cartel controlling governmental infrastructure keeps sucking the wealth of the earth into their own back pockets, while blocking us little people from those resources.

{There is NO conservative right anything in this country}

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy…It should be able to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which … will still pursue with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”—Carroll Quigley – Tragedy And Hope – 1966..

Been around since 1966. And amazingly most followers of the left versus right Hegelian charade still don’t get it..

The purpose of a two party system is the maintenance of a political cartel. Within such a framework, viable alternatives are overlooked and the same logically bankrupt status quo remains enshrined.

Have a nice day!

Much thanks goes out to There Is No Debt..

 

MY VOTE IS FOR LIFE NOT DEATH! ALL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS US IS DEATH..

 

Share

No Need to Publish Letters About Publishing Photos of Dead Deer

proctologist

Warning! The photo to the left can be viewed as offensive and an influence to your moral compass. To continue reading, first, grow up.

This morning my inbox contained a link to a Letter to the Editor published in a Maine newspaper from someone that I believe is a faculty member at Thomas College. The letter was aimed at chastising the editorial staff of the paper for printing photographs of dead deer in their newspaper, stating that they, “find it very disturbing to open the paper and find pictures of slaughtered animals and don’t understand why those of us who have moral objections to hunting need to be involuntarily exposed to these pictures.”

One cannot argue that this person, at least states, that they find photographs of dead deer – and I would presume the same for all dead animals – bothersome and has difficulty viewing them. At same time, argument can reasonably be made that this person, if they are a college professor at a Maine college, lives in a state where deer hunting has, for many decades, been a rite of passage for residents and publishing photos of  “dead deer” in local newspapers is part of that rite of passage. We are in a constant state of war. The newspapers always contain images of war and the collateral damage of war. I wonder if this same person has the same moral objections to viewing dead bodies of men and women?

The bigger picture is what is most disturbing. We now live in a society in which the mindset is one of entitlement, combined with censorship (political correctness), and the selfish desire to force all others to one’s own way of thinking. This comes because respect and an understanding and appreciation of the interests of other people, has gone missing – more than likely by design.

We can also see an extreme case of this in the aftermath of another national “selection” for a new president. I recall when Barack Obama was “selected” as president, the false left was happy while the false right lamented the thought of this person being president of the United States for 4 or 8 years. With the tide changing, the false right is happy and the false left is struggling to get over it and in some cases resorting to violence to protest what appears to be something they know little about. But I’ll save that discussion for another day.

Back to the dead deer photos. If a newspaper caved to the whims of every unstable individual, who thinks of themselves as the author of all things “moral” and stopped publishing photos they believed to be of the interest of the majority of their readers, the paper would be void of all photos, for surely with little effort, an irrational weak person can find any photo disturbing and would have moral objections to what they represent while claiming involuntary subjection to viewing the pictures. How silly and childish!

I Corinthians 13:11 reads, When I was a child, I spake as a child: I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.Once it was thought, without much  discussion, that a person who held a position as a staff member of a college, had grown up and put away childish things. Evidently not.

Perhaps the author’s real intent was to offer disparagement toward the event of hunting and those that participate in it. A grown up would simply state such a position and offer rational discourse in support of their position, rather than bang their heads on the table, in a display of childish behavior, demanding the newspaper take away pictures and protect her from being “subjected” to what she considers the immoralities of others. Unfortunately, that grown-up behavior seems to be in short supply as any sane person can realize by simply opening their eyes.

I don’t read newspapers any longer because, as a grown man, I understand that its content is propaganda and full of things that are offensive and certainly what I would classify as immoral. Should I choose to open one up, I fully expect to find as I describe. The same adult behavior would prevent me from banging my head demanding my way at the expense of all others. I can only alter my own behavior as has always been the same way of existing in a state of sanity.

I doubt that the newspapers are going to alter what they publish because one reader has been offended…or has a related mission to end hunting. Such actions prove that insanity runs rampant throughout our perverted society.

Share

Donald Trump’s 66th Floor Penthouse

Share

Trump Will Support Same Global Public Authority Obama Supported

Anti Nationalism for Internationalism.

A GLOBAL PUBLIC AUTHORITY

TOWARDS REFORMING THE INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL AND MONETARY SYSTEMS IN THE CONTEXT OF GLOBAL PUBLIC AUTHORITY

http://www.vatican.va/roman_curia/pontifical_councils/justpeace/documents/rc_pc_justpeace_doc_20111024_nota_en.html

“The Church says nothing to expose the real deceit of banking. It’s also amazing to see The Church extolling the virtues of ‘centralisation’ in, of course, the context of a beneficial almost philanthropic global public authority, which ‘centralisation’ used to be plainly called and known for what it was, ‘communism’. Since the days when school boys were told how to recognise communism, by using their eyes and common sense where they saw clear evidence demonstrating greater centralisation of power to so-called public authority in whatever guise (more for themselves in telling you what to do and less for us in deciding for ourselves what we care to do), we certainly have indeed fallen a long way in our general standards of education. The quick, simple and easy definition of communism or any other -ism with tyrannical ambitions will always be, ‘more excuses to centralise the power and authority of individual free-willed people into the hands of a few – to tell the people what they can and cannot do and whose life is of value’; welcome to the ‘common good’, welcome to slavery. Communism, a tool of the private international banking elite, as is known, has as well high ideals towards the ‘common good’ in the context of a central or global authority which funnily enough is not too dissimilar to this grand scheme ‘towards reforming the international financial and monetary systems in the context of global public authority’ that we see the church extolling. Coincidences abound, how fascinating. Oh well, nothing to see here and certainly there’s no cause for concern. Others ought to be trusted in ensuring your future, simply because they tell us we can trust them and say the ‘most’ clever things. So, it’s a good thing that we each consent to give them our power of authority as individual free-willed people because they are sure to do a better job of looking after our individual interests. Far better than we could do in ‘taking responsibility’ for looking after our own interests. Don’t you think? Besides, they have God on their side.” —There Is No Debt

Read more here..

A GLOBAL PUBLIC AUTHORITY

The U.S. Corporation of business as usual.

Share

Obama Speech On Trump “Victory”

I think it is possible that president select Trump is standing next to him in this video in his Biden costume and makeup..

Listen to Obama carefully.. Watch the second video and pay attention.. I think they’d do this and laugh about it..

I think this has been going on for quite some time..

 

Share

Peace And Love And Knowitallism

According to the loving peaceful Islamists none of these “Holy Scriptures” quoted below from their Koran mean what they actually say because most people don’t know how to read the Koran.. Only a few Koran “experts” know what is actually being said.. So far my understanding of what is being said means to divert attention from these quotes to other quotes while claiming a literal meaning of these quotes proves anyone pointing to these quotes is ignorant.. It doesn’t matter if its the Bible, science or the Koran nobody knows how to read any of it accept a few “experts.” And if your eyes see things the knowitallists disagree with you on they just claim you don’t comprehend what your eyes are looking at..

Now listen carefully; These quotes don’t have anything to do with killing anyone that does not desire to be a believer of Muhammad..

“If a Muslim discards his religion, kill him.” – Prophet Muhammad “Kill the unbelievers wherever you find them.” Koran 2:191 “Make war on the infidels living in your neighborhood.” Koran 9:123 “When opportunity arises, kill the infidels wherever you catch them.” Koran 9:5 “Any religion other than Islam is not acceptable.” Koran 3:85 “The Jews and the Christians are perverts fight them.”… Koran 9:30 “Maim and crucify the infidels if they criticize Islam” Koran 5:33 “Punish the unbelievers with garments of fire, hooked iron rods, boiling water melt their skin and bellies.” Koran 22:19 “The unbelievers are stupid urge the Muslims to fight them.” Koran 8:65 “Muslims must not take the infidels as friends.” Koran 3:28 “Terrorize and behead those who believe in scriptures other than the Qur’an.” Koran 8:12 “Muslims must muster all weapons to terrorize the infidels.” Koran 8:60

We live in the Ascendancy of The Knowitallism Dictatorship..

 

Hey ya know what? Bullets never bring bad news they bring love..

Share

What Is The Difference Between A Man And A Flower?

Interesting that Buddha new the future.. And has good advice.. But that advice leaves out the possibility of a lover bringing the flowers poisoned water.. I’m glad I was not born a flower and that I have the capacity to go and get my own water.. Ive had people say they love me, they have my back. I’ve tasted the poison in their truth…

14908278_906639279490902_5900933868551644120_n

The devil knew the plan..

“The Holy One who will keep the world in the future will be like this; in the palm of his hands and in the flat of his feet will be the design of a disk, in his side will be a stab wound; and his forehead will have many marks like scars. This Holy One will be the golden boat who will carry you over the cycle of rebirths all the way to the highest heaven {Nirvana}. Do not look for salvation in the old way; there is no salvation in it for sure; Quit the old way. And there will be a new spirit like the light of a lightening bug which will come down from the sky above to live in all of your hearts and you will be victorious over all your enemies. Nobody will be able to destroy you. If you die, you will not come back to be born in this world again. You will go to the highest heaven {Nirvana}.” —Buddha – from the Buddhist Scriptures from Wat Phra Sing in ChiangMai Province. From the book of the district headman, the religious encyclopedia volume 23 book #29.

“At present, science has no satisfactory answer to the question of the origin of life on the earth. Perhaps the appearance of life on the earth is a miracle. Scientists are reluctant to accept that view, but their choices are limited: either life was created on the earth by the will of a being outside the grasp of scientific understanding, or it evolved on our planet spontaneously, through chemical reactions occurring in nonliving matter lying on the surface of the planet. The first theory places the question of the origin of life beyond the reach of scientific inquiry. It is a statement of faith in the power of a Supreme Being not subject to the laws of science. The second theory is also an act of faith. The act of faith consists in assuming that the scientific view of the origin of life is correct, without having concrete evidence to support that belief.” (Robert Jastrow, Ph.D Theoretical Physics, Until the Sun Dies, pp. 62-63, 1977)

“…the biological theorists don’t know that Kant has analyzed why one cannot have an immanentist theory of evolution. One can have empirical observation but no general theory of evolution because the sequence of forms is a mystery; it just is there and you cannot explain it by any theory. The world cannot be explained. It is a mythical problem, so you have a strong element of myth in the theory of evolution.” (Eric Voegelin, CW Vol. 33, The Drama of Humanity Conversations, III, Myth as Environment, p. 307)

“The task before UNESCO…is to help the emergence of a single world culture with its own philosophy and background of ideas and with its own broad purpose.” Huxley spoke of two opposing worldviews — one founded on supernatural creation and the other on atheist evolutionism — confronting each other from the West and the East. In describing them he said, “You may categorize the two philosophies as…individualism versus collectivism or as the American versus the Russian…or as capitalism versus communism, or as Christianity versus Marxism. Can these opposites be reconciled, this antithesis be resolved in a higher synthesis? I believe…this can happen…through the inexorable dialectic of evolution.” —Julian Huxley, the head of UNESCO – 1947 book “UNESCO: Its Purpose and Its Philosophy.”

A single UNIVERSAL RELIGION WHERE ALL ARE WELCOME EXCEPT FUNDAMENTAL BIBLICAL BELIEF.. Such as a man reading the Bible for himself and deciding for himself what the Biblical message is.. A choice to live according to the LAW of the Bible or according to the legalese traditions of the Universalists.. Because they’re all teaching the same thing.. And that is all is forgiven, all are in GRACE.. Except a man such as myself that says all of you UNIVERSALISTS are full of crap..
A little bit of poison in the water of truth over a long period of time is how they work.. Are you one of their flowers?
Share

Being A Crook Is Hard Work

Share