August 18, 2019

Government’s Bent on Bilking Us Over “Climate Change”

Crooked Lisa Murkowski, Senator from Alaska, said in a press release yesterday that Climate Change is “impacting our way of life.” What a loaded statement. The entire lie, presented by Murkowski says: “In the Arctic, we’re seeing warming at twice the average of the rest of the Lower 48. It is directly impacting our way of life,” Murkowski said. “Many remote communities in Alaska are heavily reliant on expensive diesel fuel for heating and power. Integrating cleaner energy technologies, often with a microgrid, can decrease reliance on diesel and provide greater reliability.” 

If we are assumed to be so stupid as not see the absolute ridiculousness of this statement, then perhaps we should just act that stupid and demand that Murkowski, and all others, shut the hell up and just wait for the Climate Change to make it so hot in Alaska they won’t need to be concerned about heating costs.

If Climate Change is causing Alaska to warm up at a rate twice that of the Lower 48, then Alaskans should be celebrating the end to overblown heating bills.

Nearly always the lying, cheating, stealing, worthless politicians get caught wallowing in their own excrement as they attempt to control and destroy the rest of us.

One has to wonder just how much money Murkowski and all those that continue to buy her election have invested in “cleaner energy technology.”

Ah, but…

DON’T Go Look!!!!

Share

After I’ve Made My Millions, Only Then Can I Tell the Truth

We see everyday people pushing some agenda that involves millions, perhaps even billions of dollars. Once dishonest crooks get their millions of dollars and the source of that new money is exhausted, only then can the crook begin to tell the truth…especially if that “truth” means even more money.

I recall several years ago now, when Dr. David Mech, often proclaimed as the premier “expert” on wolves, lied, cheated, and stole his way through a rigged system that placed in his lap a lot of money for wolf research, etc. He made up stories to support his dishonest actions and to keep the cash flow coming. He got what he wanted. He got wolves illegally introduced into the Greater Yellowstone ecosystem so that he would have something to play with that just happened to pay great dividends. Once the cash cow was milked dry and the good Dr. had no more lies to tell, Mech began to whistle a different tune, even making statements that his original theories about wolves, like alpha males and wolves’ capabilities of “balancing” an ecosystem, were walked back to something more near the truth. Was there money to be had from this change of direction? More than likely.

Today, I read a long report from an environmentalist who made gobs of filthy money by pushing the lies about renewable energy and global warming. No, this isn’t Al Gore who wrote the report, but it could very well have been.

The author of this report tells about all the things he did to screw the public out of billions of dollars, I’m sure making him a filthy, dishonest, rich person.

Now that he’s made his billion dollars, he can comfortably claim that solar panels and wind mills are a waste of money and that they destroy the environment far greater than current methods of energy creation and use.

The point of all this is that we are suckers for these Flim-Flam sellers of magic elixirs. In their dishonesty and greed, void of any semblance of a conscience, they concoct some far out fantasy, such as global warming caused by you and I attempting to live a normal and decent life, embellish the concocted lie, which requires more lying, cheating, and stealing, and then rush in with a solution that yields them filthy rotten lucre, enough to fill a semi tractor trailer.

Oh, wait a moment. I think I just described the Hegelian Dialectic. I did. We are taken to the cleaners on a regular basis by these con artists, wanting so much to believe their rotten lies, allowing the crooks to make millions of dollars from it. And we still don’t get it.

Maybe next time it will be different? If I can just try that one more time.

Share

Climate Change Destroyed the Roman Empire?

Who would have thought? Giving us another reason to never believe or trust what is written about history (the victors write history and embellish it. The fascists fabricate it and present it as truth.) we find in a modern version of history, one of the things that destroyed the Roman Empire was “Climate Change” – with no definition provided in the article about what defines Climate Change. (I guess that’s because the “science” is settled?)

The author gives us his definition of what causes the collapse of a “civilization”: “Collapse can be defined as a rapid and enduring loss of population, identity and socio-economic complexity. Public services crumble and disorder ensues as government loses control of its monopoly on violence.”

HUH?

That stuff is pretty general and some of it extremely value-weighted leaving much of it up to one’s perspective…isn’t it? I am a bit puzzled by the statement “disorder ensues as government loses control of its monopoly on violence.” Again, I say, HUH?

I could have sworn that in our modern American society, government basically controls/creates all violence within a society, directly or indirectly.

Avoiding a situation of going around in circles of ignorant discussions about what causes a civilization’s collapse, let’s just move on for the sake of pointing out the errors of modern historical recollections.

This same author evidently has the cures, “We know what needs to be done: emissions can be reduced, inequalities levelled, environmental degradation reversed, innovation unleashed and economies diversified.” All this and let’s not forget we must stop Climate Change. After all, it is what destroyed the Roman Empire and all others.

I hope some of you find all of this a bit odd…or at least lacking? Nowhere in this neo-quasi-historic piece of fiction it is even suggested that any kind of destruction in moral values plays any part in the destruction of a civilization. At the time, I’m sure Caligula would have disagreed that it did. I wonder if he has different thoughts today.

Throughout history it could seriously be argued that immorality was the common denominator leading to the destruction of any civilization. And yet, blindly wallowing in an immoral civilization, the cures are simple – clean up the environment, strive for equality and diversity, both economic and socially, while unleashing innovation. (You mean like AI and robots to do our thinking?)

We are doomed to ruin! How do I know? I think Biblical prophecy might have something to say about that but I doubt few would heed even if I were to share. And, herein lies the rub. Our doom is based on the fact that we can’t see what is killing us and destroying our own existence. We are blind and delusional.

An example of this might be found in a news article about how a robot is being used to further brainwash the followers of Buddha and to draw new followers. Presented as the product of AI (artificial intelligence) programmers fill the robot with all the false doctrines of Buddhism and cause many to “worship after the Beast.”

One must applaud the Buddhists for seeing that it is from the mouths of men that spoil the religions they represent. This phenomenon is present everywhere that anyone goes where a humanoid, more accurately resembling a “Borg” robot programmed to echo the teachings drilled into their heads filling blind followers with crap sandwiches.

In this modern age of techno-zombies, incapable of thinking or even exerting enough effort to find truth themselves, these automatons easily love AI and thus a robot. This civilization has been successfully programmed to accept AI as the holy grail of all things that must be believed and followed. (And they wondered after the Beast.)

You see, there is but one GOD ALMIGHTY, one CREATOR. His Spirit of Truth gives us the only moral compass that we need. I argue this society has lost its moral direction as it is spiraling toward its own destruction. Climate Change, the Environment, economic and social diversity has absolutely nothing to do with whether or not this civilization will collapse.

It’s inevitable.

Share

Brainless Socialist House Rep. Says You Shouldn’t Have Children Because of Climate Change

The zipper-headed communist representative to the House of Representatives, Ocasio-Cortez, says people should reconsider having children because there is “scientific consensus” that Climate Change will cause life to be hard for children.

If that is the case, then perhaps we should consider ridding this country of all congressional representatives, especially those that fail to function at a level of intelligence higher than pre-school, because it is making life hard for everyone…at least those who have a brain.

Climate Change, as it is being promoted by mindless people, does not and cannot exist. What does exist is a corrupt government that holds the power and technology to manipulate the weather and other atmospheric conditions that is being used against all of us to cause fires, droughts, flooding, heat, cold, snow and to fill the sky with metals and chemicals that are killing the masses. That existence of real Climate Change is what we should be fighting against. But instead, our own ignorance and brainwashing, as is on display in Congress, forces us to accept a theory about man-caused (not government but the very act of living by us “common” people) climate change, which is targeted at forcing us to limit our freedom to live as we choose and not give everything we have to a filthy, rotten, government that knows only how to bleed us dry and then kill us.

How does that children’s song go? Oh, yeah. In part: “…if I only had a brain.”

Share

Climate Change: And We’re Not Dead Already?

Here is an example of a bunch of lying, insane, freaks that should be locked up someplace along with millions of others.

This is YOUR tax dollars at work. Just a simple observation: Water seeks its own level and yet water levels can be higher in one place of the same body of water than in another. The other simpleton question is: Where does water come from and where does water go?

This fascist/totalitarian press release is telling us we all should be dead by now.

From the House Committee on Energy and Natural Resources:

Washington D.C. – Today the Natural Resources Committee continued its historic series on climate change impacts across the country with a hearing in the Subcommittee on National Parks, Forest and Public lands – led by Chair Deb Haaland (D-N.M.) – on Climate Change and Public Lands: Examining Impacts and Considering Adaptation Opportunities.

Expert witnesses suggested our public lands, national parks, and historic sites face a grim future without more aggressive action to combat climate change. Patrick Gonzalez, a climate scientist and forest ecologist at the University of California, Berkeley, provided a detailed list of the impacts attributed to human-caused climate change in his testimony. Selected highlights include:

Glaciers melting –

  • In Glacier Bay National Park, Alaska, climate change melted 2,100 ft. of ice (depth) from Muir Glacier from 1948 to 2000.

Snowpack decline –

  • Across the western U.S., including North Cascades National Park and 10 other national parks, climate change has melted snowpack to its lowest level in eight centuries.

Sea level rise –

  • Climate change has raised sea level by 9 inches since 1854 at Golden Gate National Recreation Area in San Francisco; by 17 inches since 1856 in New York City, not far from the Statue of Liberty National Monument; and by 12 inches since 1924 in Washington, D.C., not far from the Jefferson Memorial and the White House, which are managed by the National Park Service.

Wildfire increase –

  • Across the western U.S., including Yellowstone National Park and Yosemite National Park, climate change doubled the area burned by wildfire from 1984 to 2015 compared to the area of natural burning.

Photos at the Committee Flickr page

A Livestream recording of the hearing is available here

Video of Vice-Chair Haaland’s opening statement

Video of Chair Grijalva’s remarks

Video of Dr. Gonzalez’s testimony

Share

Communism’s “Green New Deal”

Yesterday I made reference to how the leadership in the U.S. House of Representatives more resembled that of fascism/totalitarianism because it was their intention to implement “strong new federal policies.”

Today, we can read where the Chair of the House Natural Resources Committee is “all in” with the avowed communists’ “Green New Deal” stating: “The Green New Deal is the right framework for the work we need to do..”

You can read the Green New Deal Resolution here.

I want to go ahead and paste the beginning part of this Green New Deal Resolution so that readers (I wish) can see the insanity behind it. And yet, we see so many in leadership and the eager totalitarians swallowing the utter nonsense as though WE ARE ALL GONNA DIE!

Those who believe this nonsense are ignorant of the Global Agenda of Sustainable Development, which includes eugenics, i.e. a need to rid the world of billions of useless eaters who stand in the way of those promoting it. It is the promoters who make the claims robbed for this resolution. Despite the facts, and they are unlimited, any data being used in this regard is useless from a scientific perspective, yet, True Believers refuse to listen. None of the dangers listed are happening. It’s all embellished, emotional, clap-trap designed to instill fear in people that they will assimilate, to line up to be killed by their own hands.

If this isn’t scary to you, I’m sorry.

RESOLUTION

Recognizing the duty of the Federal Government to create a Green New Deal.

Whereas the October 2018 report entitled ‘‘Special Report on
Global Warming of 1.5oC’’ by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change and the November 2018
Fourth National Climate Assessment report found that—

(1) human activity is the dominant cause of ob-
served climate change over the past century;

(2) a changing climate is causing sea levels to rise
and an increase in wildfires, severe storms, droughts, and
other extreme weather events that threaten human life,
healthy communities, and critical infrastructure;

(3) global warming at or above 2 degrees Celsius be-
yond preindustrialized levels will cause—

(A) mass migration from the regions most af-
fected by climate change;

(B) more than $500,000,000,000 in lost annual
economic output in the United States by the year
2100;
(C) wildfires that, by 2050, will annually burn
at least twice as much forest area in the western
United States than was typically burned by wildfires
in the years preceding 2019;
(D) a loss of more than 99 percent of all coral
reefs on Earth;
(E) more than 350,000,000 more people to be
exposed globally to deadly heat stress by 2050; and
(F) a risk of damage to $1,000,000,000,000 of
public infrastructure and coastal real estate in the
United States; and

(4) global temperatures must be kept below 1.5 de-
grees Celsius above preindustrialized levels to avoid the

most severe impacts of a changing climate, which will re-
quire—

(A) global reductions in greenhouse gas emis-
sions from human sources of 40 to 60 percent from

2010 levels by 2030; and
(B) net-zero emissions by 2050;

Share

When Fascists/Totalitarians Rule

I visited the website of the Chair of the House Committee on Natural Resources, Raul Grijalva, and read the following:

“The House Natural Resources Committee, led by Chair Raúl M. Grijalva (D-Ariz.), held the first hearing today of a monthlong series on climate change impacts to communities and the need for strong new federal policies.” (emboldening added)

And that is what is wrong with Climate Change as presented to the people by fascist rule to be carried out by eager totalitarians.

“Strong new federal policies” equates to loss of freedom and increased taxes and oppression placed on the citizen slaves.

Share

Climate Change Geoengineering: Yahushua Come Quickly

But now, the cat is officially out of the bag, as even Forbes just dropped a bombshell on its website: a new plan from Harvard scientists to “tackle climate change through geoengineering by clocking out the sun,” an admission that strangely enough has managed to stay off the radar screens of most major online media publications.<<<Read More>>>

Share

Disease: For the Love of Predators?

Here we go with one more “study” that “suggests” that a reduction in the presence of foxes and perhaps other smaller predators who feast on mice is causing an increase in those rodents/mice that carry and spread diseases such as Lyme Disease.

For at least 6 years there have been ample studies suggesting the same thing. However, one of the problems associated with these so-called “studies” is that in one form or another all causes not desired by the individual or group of individuals seeking desired results, are blamed on “Climate Change,” i.e. Global Warming.

When reading the latest report about predators and the spread of disease, I recalled that I had read not that long ago about Joh Lund, publisher of the Maine Sportsman Magazine stating that he tended to agree that a reduction in the number of foxes could be the root cause of an increase in Lyme and other diseases carried and spread by small rodents like the white-footed mouse that carries Lyme. Lund’s hypothesis is that the reduction of foxes is caused by direct competition from coyotes. With Maine and other states experiencing ample growth in the number of coyotes, wolves, and coywolves, the result is a sharp reduction in foxes and other smaller prey responsible for keeping in check the rodents that carry disease.

Perhaps we can just as easily blame the increased spread of diseases, such as Lyme disease, on a misguided approach to wildlife management. So long as wildlife managers insist that the crux of their decision making will be based upon social demands, i.e. the protection of large predators, then we cannot expect any changes that might result in the reduction of disease-carrying rodents.

To go along with this misguided approach to wildlife management, there are ample groups and individuals with pet projects aimed at protecting one species of animal over the other with all the fabricated excuses for doing so. The larger and wealthier the animal protection group is the more pressure they can put on wildlife managers who insist on making their decisions based on social demands. 

Most state wildlife managing departments openly invite this kind of pressure to be brought on themselves by publicly announcing that they will cave into social demands regardless of any scientific knowledge.

At work, we have those who believe that killing off large numbers of deer will reduce the presence and spread of Lyme Disease. We also have those who love coyotes, wolves, coywolves, and all other breeds and mixed breeds of wild dogs who refuse to allow any managers to necessarily go about killing those animals in order to find some kind of balance that should be desired for a healthy ecosystem and thus creating an atmosphere where people are less likely to get sick.

Perhaps lost in all this modern-day Voodoo Science and Romance Biology is the fact that animals are nasty and spread diseases. I don’t personally believe that this creation was intended to live in our homes or that we should be demanding that disease-spreading animals of any kind should be protected. This misguided hogwash about Nature’s Balance is causing all kinds of problems, the majority of which are not being talked about and people refuse to listen. It’s easier to blame all problems on Climate Change than to address these issues responsibly.

If wildlife biologists and managers, who aren’t completely brainwashed into this modern wildlife management hocus-pocus, were allowed to manage wildlife from a real scientific perspective and an understanding that many of these animals are a resource intended for the people, and void of perverted social demands, perhaps then and only then will be able to do a better job. Until that happens – and I’m not holding my breath, – we can expect more disease problems and safety threats to the people who want to pursue Life, Liberty, and Happiness. 

Share

“When, how…and by whom?”

I recently wrote some colleagues that”:

“Bad laws” not only “ensure bad results”: they are like the bushel baskets full of oysters (and salt water) that some East Coast bay man totes in the bed of his pickup from boat to market 5 days a week.  Pretty soon the bed and then the truck shows evidence of rusty corrosion but by then it is too late.  The rust spreads, the value of the truck plummets to nothing, and he just keeps driving it until it falls apart.

These bad laws are like that salt water dripping from those baskets and we are noticing more and more corrosion while we try to tell ourselves that it isn’t too bad and we should get more years from the truck.  But we are just fooling ourselves. Rural America (and urban America as well but no one dares mention it) is the truck and we not only no longer care for it but we abuse it (and the people that live there and use it) because we accept lies from government on behalf of the rich and powerful about what a good thing it is to protect large, deadly and destructive predators that eradicate game animals, ranchers, and rural communities on behalf of pagan claptrap about biology and more hidden agendas than termites in an African termite mound.

A colleague responded that:

No need to explain why something needs to be done about this ever-increasing problem, the next line of questions, when, how…and by whom?”

——————————————————————————————————————-

My response-

THE problem is (unjust, un-Constitutional, tyrannical, etc.) absolute power given to central government bureaucrats in federal legislation like the ESA, Animal Welfare Act and similar Acts “enforced”, administered and regulated by US Fish & Wildlife Service, National Park Service, EPA, US Forest Service and BLM.  In a word, it is Political.

Regarding wolves; federal bureaucracies, and especially USFWS, have stolen money from state wildlife agencies, introduced and protected wolves and with few exceptions converted the State Wildlife Agencies and environmental scientists, Universities and “science” into little more than paid subcontractors for federal agendas.  Federal politicians and bureaucrats are rewarded with money, votes (mostly urban) and fame for doing what rich individuals and rich and radical environmental organizations want for a host of hidden agendas from eliminating hunting and private property in vast swaths of America to reducing the human population and stripping most of the human benefits created in the past century.

Both federal Legislatures and the Presidency benefit from happy environmental radicals and the “Deep State”, “Swamp”, (whatever you want to call it) that manages ESA, wolves, grizz, etc. for them.  Federal judges are nominated and ratified by those folks and this accounts for the increasing national divide in courtrooms reflected in whether “your” judge emerged under Democrat or Republican reigns.

The naked truth is that, like abortion, the Democrat Party is 100% behind this environmentalism and anyone deviating from that absolute support is marginalized and either silenced or removed.  The Republican Party has many members that talk a good game about “doing something” about these matters depending on the temper of those that elect them, but it is only talk.  Given the declining rural voting numbers, electing and expecting a good person to be able to fight to limit the power of the bureaucracy in these matters is wistful, to say the least.

All through this the federal bureaucracy gets increasing budgets, more higher-grade positions (and retirements), bigger bonuses, and a publicly unchallengeable authority no matter the basis or outcomes.

The current Administration boasts it is “de-regulating” and it is but “de-regulating” is only a temporary fix because it only reflects the authority of the current President and his appointees.  What they do can (and will) be undone done in a New York nanosecond by the next President who, if the last fifty years tell us anything, will be a “Deep State” or ”Swamp” enabler to his or her bones as will their successor for a long time.  The Mueller Probe alone tells us that but don’t forget the IRS, FBI and DOJ’s recent history as political weapons that appear to only be growing bolder and stronger about controlling us on behalf of our rulers. Consider getting political support for things like wolves and grizzlies in this climate.  A Yukon trapper just killed a grizzly near his cabin and then discovered his 10-month-old baby and its mother ripped apart where they had tried to flee the same grizzly.  Do we hear even one peep from rural Americans in the Lower 48 about the insanity of spreading and protecting grizzly bears by the federal government in the Lower 48?  From any of “our” NGO’s or state governments?

The current Administration tells us they are “purging” environmental radical bureaucrats.  I watched the current federal natural resource bureaucrats pop up out of the mud in the 1980’s and 90’s, often in high positions immediately.  Using the new race and sex preferences that financially benefitted cooperating top managers quite handsomely; common sense and scientifically educated bureaucrats were steadily replaced by extremist activists with actual animus toward the agencies and their historic missions FOR THE BENEFIT OF PEOPLE, ESPECIALLY THOSE LIVING WITH AND/OR UTILIZING THOSE RESOURCES.  Not only 20+years of such “purging” and hiring (I was terminated in 2000) but more importantly how they each replicated each other when hiring, promoting and awarding bonuses like wolves and grizzlies being imposed into settled landscapes has created a federal (and most state) radical workforce that if not reduced by 75% each year and then kept below 25% of current levels while Universities and science are reformed, will defy any controls by whatever it takes.

Unless we amend this top-down, federal mandate approach to wildlife management, all the “de-regulation” and personnel changes will be temporary at best.  So, one might ask, “what can we do”?  We must change the authority and jurisdictions that has been given to federal bureaucrats and replace it with a restoration of state authority over wildlife in the State excepting those species covered by ratified Treaties.  Federal concerns about “endangered” species (not sub sp., races, populations, etc.) should be proposed to the State with rationale, objective and federal funding for however long proposed.  State acceptance should allow amendments and require both legislative and Governor acceptance.  This is where rural residents of the state need to restructure the state ratification of such proposals to give rural residents increased ratification weight in the approval process.

So how do we get there in the present political “climate”? 

I live in a very liberal, Democrat state.  The only Republican elected last month was a dogcatcher in some rural norther County and has since been forced to flee when Antifa arrived in town. (That is a joke.)

About 4 hours ago I put out my flag and picked up my Saturday edition of the Minneapolis Star Tribune in the driveway.  When I opened it, the front page had an article, “Students get charged up about climate change”.  Here are some excerpts:

  • “When it comes to confronting climate change” “Some adults get struck on certain things” and “No is not acceptable.”
  • “Youthful advocates are leading rallies, gathering petitions and taking daring climate resolutions to City Halls and County Boardrooms”.
  • “But they’ve also studied their own backyards – from the urban core to the suburbs and small towns.”
  • “So iMatter (sic note the little ‘you’ in the name of one of this little-known enviro front organization) studies the energy behind other movements, including the fight for civil rights and same sex marriage.”
  • “Emotions make movements.”
  • “Young people can personalize this, can reach people at an emotional level.”
  • “Cities can make a big difference.”  “You get an enough grass roots action happening… it can force the state and federal government to move.”
  • “The city (sic Grand Marais, an expensive, elite enclave on the North Shore of Lake Superior) has even hired a climate change Coordinator, a position funded by a McKnight Foundation Grant.”
  • “It’s a very individualistic place”, said Craig Feist, 17, of Finlayson, about 100 miles north of the Twin Cities.  “People have their land, and they consider that their domain and do kind of whatever they want to do on it.”

Now I could call this a Socialist/Communist approach to brainwashing young minds and setting the stage for a government takeover because it is the reverse of Mao Tse Tung’s Cultural Revolution wherein the rural peasants occupied and purged the cities and the elites.  It is a rare glimpse into how these liberal bastions gain, keep and control political power.  Here we have the privileged elites using their children to lay the groundwork for purging the countryside and those yokels that oppose any of their agendas. However, I ask you to consider how “our side” in this environmental confrontation has behaved and can be expected to continue to behave:

  • Do we energize young rural students to dismiss adults with whom they disagree?
  • Do we send kids into the cities to explain what wolves and grizzlies and many other GI (Government Issue) animals are doing to our communities?
  • Do we send kids forth to defend property rights to property-less urbanites?
  • Do we condemn urbanites for being herd-animals (versus “individualistic”)?
  • Do we presume to brag that we have “studied” our home places and therefore have the right to lecture and abjure urban know-nothings?
  • Do we send forth youthful missionaries to cities to explain why it is so important to “Keep and Bear Arms”?
  • Would we rightly expect rural youth to be listened to in almost any city if they extolled such things publicly without fearing of violent reactions?

Until we can put the environmental genie of unjust federal power back in the bottle I cannot imagine how anything really changes.  We are forced to maneuver outside the walls of government about controlling wolves; limiting future areas to be infested; how controls will be effected; who will do the controlling; how long will controls be effected; and how will it all be paid for?  Traps are nasty and inhumane.  Snares are icky and unacceptable non-target species.  Planes are illegal and uncontrollable over property.  Can controls be forced in private properties or government landholdings?  When can control be exercised?  When killing livestock or pets?  When in a yard?  When appearing sick?  Who is responsible for rabid wolves or human infection outbreaks like tapeworms, etc.?  Can wolf population target levels be based on big game numbers, livestock depredations, human attacks or imagined threats like hanging around school bus stops?  Can hides be sold for trophies or home decorations?  Can any County or State say, “We don’t want any wolves here and we want to be able to kill any wolf here year-around”?

It is only realistic to see a hodgepodge of temporary and conflicting results emerging and being challenged (until the next President is elected).

Jim Beers

8 December 2018

If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.  Thanks.

Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC.  He also served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in the Aleutian Islands.  He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC.  He testified three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority.  He resides in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.

You can receive future articles by sending a request with your e-mail address to:   jimbeers7@comcast.net

If you no longer wish to receive these articles notify:  jimbeers7@comcast.net

Share