December 14, 2017

Stop the Bus and Let Me Off

Share

House Votes to Reduce Your Inalienable Rights

Yesterday the U.S. House of Representatives voted and passed H.R. 38, by a vote of 231-198. All the usual suspects, i.e. NRA, NSSF, etc., are claiming a great victory. Stupid is as stupid does.

H.R. 38 is commonly known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. What isn’t known by most people is that in order to get the bill to the House floor, it had to contain the “Fix NICS” portion designed, we are told, to improve the criminal background check system.

So what does all of this do?

First, let’s look at the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (CCRA). Most fail to understand that it should be an unquestioned (inalienable: unquestioned, unable to be taken away) right of any man to defend himself, and yet today’s American society does everything that it can to hand that inalienable right over to the power and control of Government. It makes little sense to me.

With this fact in mind, why is it that Americans are required by Government to be taxed on a piece of paper that grants them a privilege to own or conceal-carry a gun? We must also ask, that if it is an unquestioned right to self-defense, why can’t we cross state lines legally carrying a concealed or any weapon at all?

In addition, ignorants who think they are fighting for Second Amendment rights, are some of the first to stand up and make a lot of noise about state sovereignty. When it fits their narrative, in their minds the states have the right, as found in the Tenth Amendment (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.) to control their own fates in ways “NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE CONSTITUTION.” And so, by pushing Congress to pass a reciprocity act, they have now delegated the United States to control concealed carry, and the states have now lost some of their sovereignty in deciding how it wants to regulate guns.

With Congress now in control, a group of fascist crooks who would sell their soul to Satan to continue their quest for being pagan sodomites, can alter and take away their GRANTED, which you gave them, privilege with the drop of a hat. LOVING SERVITUDE!

True Second Amendment supporters, not those who think the NRA is their gun rights gOD, would be pushing to make all states “Constitutional Carry,” (poor choice of a label) i.e. man does not need a writ of privilege from any government to protect himself at all times. Which brings us to an interesting part of this new bill.

Some states have always had or recently enacted, laws that strip away the requirement for a permit to carry a gun, concealed or otherwise. With the passage of H.R. 38, where each state is to recognize the piece of paper issued for concealed carry, what does that mean for the constitutional carry person coming and going across state lines?

Read what “qualifies” someone to participate in the Government’s new privilege: “A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by, or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in, his or her state of residence.

Constitutional carry assumes a person has a “privilege” to own, receive or transport a gun. There are already laws to deal with that. To qualify, that same person must have a valid photo identification document, a Government instrument, and “carry a valid concealed carry permit” issued in their state. Oops! According to the NRA and others, those who believe in the alienable right to keep and bear arms, just got punished. Whose side is who on anyway?

Seems that Constitutional Carry just got knocked down a peg or six and anyone wishing to be protected when they cross state lines must comply with fascist Big Brother.

So, you ignoramuses keep on turning everything you have over to the control of the Federal Government and soon you’ll have nothing. Follow the corrupt NRA, who is NOT the friend of Second Amendment people. They are the friends of making money and, like Government, will sell you down the river for a buck.

Secondly, it was basically the “Left” who insisted that “Fix NICS” be part of the bill or no deal. Many of the same people who think reciprocity was a good thing, also believe that a background check stops crime. In proclaiming victory, the NRA stated: “All Americans, including law-abiding gun owners, agree that violent criminals should not have legal access to firearms.” These are the same ones who stand and shout that gun laws only harm the lawful citizen, prohibiting them to self-defense, and yet they push something as stupid as a law they now claim will stop criminals.

Any “improvements” to the criminal background check system results in nothing more than more government control, which, it appears, Americans are falling in love with, and a further destruction of a person’s inalienable right to protect and defend themselves at all times.

We’re killing ourselves and loving it!

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act Vote

Today, Wednesday, December 6, 2017, Congress will vote on H.R. 38, the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. Call your representative and let them know how you feel about this bill.

Share

Has Governor LePage Flip-Flopped Or Not on Background Checks

It seems that my article of a few days ago about how Maine’s Governor Paul LePage advocating for stricter gun control through background checks, is but a part of a greater stir in Maine about the governor’s OpEd.

Centrist Lance Dutson, a Susan Collins supporter, presented his own OpEd disparaging “hardcore gun rights advocates” for seeing some of the same things I saw when I read the governor’s piece.

If you take the time to read through the comments from readers, it might become clear, but I doubt it, that, like just about everything in America today, it’s a Left/Right issue. Comprehending written words is a lost art, replaced with ideology and political rhetoric parroted by those choosing a side absent independent thought.

I don’t necessarily intend to be cruel, but I am at a loss for how to explain the truth honestly and accurately.

From the comments section, some attempt to ridicule Dutson because he is a Susan Collins supporter and they believe him to be a Centrist, i.e. a supporter of the RINO (Republican in name only) faction. Others claim that Dutson has failed to comprehend LePage’s historic position and that his recent commentary on background checks is but reinforcing the same belief he has carried throughout his political career.

What was clear to me was that Dutson has an aversion to anyone with a strong support of the Second Amendment. I wonder if he has the same aversion toward those who support the other articles of the Bill of Rights?

Even ignoring the governor’s past, what he wrote clearly states that he supports tighter controls on background checks. When he extolled the need for more workers to the do the checks, more money to pay for those checks as well as finding those who slipped through the cracks of the system, no matter how you slice it, he is supporting more stringent government intervention in order to further decay the Second Amendment…..PERIOD! It is childish and ignorant to feign support for LePage, or anybody for that matter, simply because he’s on your “side.”

Those who support the NRA, as Governor LePage has done during his political career, unknowingly support tighter controls on gun ownership. Willful blindness prevents them from seeing that the NRA, a strong advocate for government control over background checks, along with other “reasonable” measures to destroy the Second Amendment, is not the pure advocate for the right to keep and bear arms some believe them to be. For decades I have listened to the “True Believers” of the NRA state that the organization is the best and strongest supporter of the Second Amendment and therefore we should give them our money and our lives. No thanks! This might be akin to desiring to be hung with a new rope instead of the old one.

Until such time as people can (and they never will) lose the Left/Right false paradigm and make decisions based on independent thought, nothing will change. The Left will argue with the Right, the Right with the Left and, as we see in the comment section of this article, each side will argue among themselves, all the while unknowingly advocating for their own demise….and liking it too, I might add.

Read LePage’s words. Understand what those words mean. (Either the Governor understands what he wrote and politically advocates stricter gun control or he’s ignorant of the meaning of the words he chose to use.) Forget he’s who he is. If you support the Second Amendment then support it regardless of political loyalties and false promises.

Share

Embellishing a Fake Problem With Gun Purchase Background Check System

I wondered how long it would take before idiots would begin placing demands on “improving” the criminal background check system.

Here we go.

First, understand, if you are willing and able, that the Texas church shooting may have been a staged event, part of its purpose to draw attention to background checks…another prohibitive measure for a person to keep and bear arms. The press lies….constantly, and are 100% controlled by the government and other powers who want guns taken out of the hands of every American.

The Texas shooting, we are told, included a “failed” background check that allowed the shooter to illegally purchase a gun because he was a convicted felon.

The calls are going out demanding stricter controls and tighter background checks, even from those fake “conservatives” who lie to you every day, but you refuse to see it.

In a USA Today article, we read: “The FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) vets millions of gun purchase transactions every year. But the thousands of gun seizure requests highlight persistent problems in a system where analysts must complete background checks within three days of the proposed purchase. If the background check is not complete within the 72-hour time limit, federal law allows the sale to go forward. ATF agents are asked to take back the guns if the FBI later finds these sales should have been denied. “

In addition supposedly certain “agents” are fearful of having to go out and retrieve guns from some 4,000 gun purchasers where it was later found out a background check failed.

“In addition to the public safety risks, the ATF agents tasked with retrieving the banned weapons from unauthorized gun owners across the country are exposed to potentially dangerous confrontations.”

However, this is not the first time agents have had to go retrieve guns. In addition, the ATF refuses to disclose if there were any problems getting the guns back, which makes an honest person ask if it’s so dangerous why aren’t they telling us all about the shootouts they’ve had getting the guns back? (wink-wink)

“The ATF declined to provide information on the 4,170 gun purchases the FBI referred for seizure last year.”

One way or another, these fascists are determined to get our guns and prevent or limit the sale of guns in any way they can. The hype over the background check system is but one more way to further add restrictions to an already meaningless activity that produces no good results, costs the taxpayers billions of dollars, and restricts the right to keep and bear arms by government force through regulation.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Maine Governor Advocates for Stricter Gun Control Laws

It appears that Maine Governor Paul LePage has come out with recommendations that the existing laws on the books that severely rip apart our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, be strictly enforced and even beefed up. This is a classic example of fake “conservatives” pretending that they know what the term means while advocating for the smothering of individual rights and a destruction of your Second Amendment right.

LePage says that those who commit gun violence, “always have a relationship to either drugs, domestic violence or mental illness.” That may be so, or maybe not. However, drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness affects many aspects of everyone’s lives. If it is so important that these conditions are responsible for gun violence, then what is it that this fascist government is doing about drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness? Our society is nearly 100% dependent on prescription and over-the-counter drugs, pushed heavily through the media to ensure the addictions continue. It is said that mental illness appears more prevalent in our society only because of better detection. Really? Is it really a proper thing that any GI who seeks counseling, perhaps because of war distress, should be considered a mental problem and barred from owning a gun? Who gets to decide what mental disorders are and why they disqualify any individual from owning a gun? I see many in positions to make such decisions loonier than the patients they are condemning.

As a society, we promote violence in our media – movies, and music and just about everything we do in life. And yet, instead of addressing that problem, we think we can cure the domestic violence issue by severely limiting a person’s right to keep and bear arms.

While fake “patriots” pretend that they would never consider infringing on anyone’s right to free speech or freedom of expression (art, music, movies, video games, etc.) they think, evidently as Paul LePage does, that destroying the rights of law-abiding citizens to self-protection is a responsible thing to do; that somehow this will cure the drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness problems.

Fake Second Amendment advocates are the first to claim that taking away rights of law-abiding citizens is wrong, and yet this opinion piece of Governor LePage’s is a clear example of how one right is treated differently than all others. If drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness “always have a relationship” to gun violence, and you advocate for the destruction of the Second Amendment while doing nothing to address the other issues, thinking it’s a cure, you are an ignorant hypocrite.

Each time good-intentioned rights destroyers approach the Second Amendment with advocation of limited rights, the enforcement of the existing laws, and even strengthening the limits on rights, they are promoting gun control and are strong allies with the radical gun control fascists.

For the same reason gun control has no effect on criminals, gun control does nothing to stop drug abuse, mental illness, and domestic violence.

Time to give it a rest and begin strengthening our Second Amendment rights instead of looking for ways to further destroy them.

“The federal government must do a better job to provide adequate resources for background checks on people purchasing firearms.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

It’s Always Left Against Right….or Something

After the fake shooting in Texas, as always, the debate over gun control carries on, as ignorant voices claim the high ground, pretending to exude their vast knowledge of history, rights, liberalism, conservatism, progressivism and anything that embellishes the divide and conquer meme so prevalent and yet seemingly impossible to see  – another display of the attributes of the Hegelian Dialectic.

Life in the United States is 100% relegated to the false paradigm of Left and Right. The paradigm is fake but the minds of those who blindly follow either side exemplify the success of the created crises, the result of years of brainwashing and propagandizing. Regardless of the topic at hand, almost always these days a crisis, the only attempt and understanding such an event is either Left or Right – nothing else matters. And so it goes.

In a Town Hall Magazine article, about how the author believes the “Liberal Narrative” is now dead because he says so, the author also refers to himself and all others who think the way he does as “normal.” I’m not sure that would be a correct use of the word. Although I understand what he is trying to say, there is very little “normal” left anywhere in the world – so much so few have knowledge of what the words or liberal, conservative and progressive mean or the history behind them. I’ll spare you the history lesson but encourage you to try on your own. The short of it is the use of such labels are egregiously misappropriated.

Normal to the author is the belief you are a conservative. Normal to the liberal is their own truth, etc.

It is said that conservatism promotes “traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization.” Conservatism once emphasized self-reliance and individualism. That aspect of conservatism vanished quite some time ago and only exists as watered down ideology due to our mind manipulated love of government.

With this embedded into our society, one must consider the ignorance of that author when he writes: “When you own a weapon and can defend yourself and your rights, you are a citizen. When you do not, you are a subject.” If you are a citizen, and promote it as something a conservative would strive to become, then what becomes of the “self-reliance and individualism?” Many years ago in Vattel’s Law of Nations, in which many democratically based governments’ constitutions are built upon, it is clearly spelled out that when anyone chooses to become a member of a neighborhood, a town, a county, a state, or nation, they are giving away a portion of their “self-reliance and individualism.” In fact, you become a citizen and by definition you are a subject. The only differences are the degree to which you have offered up your servitude.

When you own a weapon and can defend yourself and your rights, YOU ARE A MAN! Being a citizen means you recognize that your government has granted you that right. Being a man means you understand that you have the right to defend yourself, even from the throes of corrupt governments. It is a struggle to have it both ways, i.e. self-reliance and individualism and dependence on government.

Liberalism, on the other hand, appears to be in even bigger trouble…that is as it pertains to hanging on to any kind of liberal belief. In the true sense of the word and the works and words of men like John Locke, thought by many to be the father of liberalism, I am more liberal than conservative. But that’s not what exists today. Far from it.

Liberalism, by definition, is “founded on the ideas of liberty and equality.” If we are to assume that this ideological philosophy of liberalism is to be shared and experienced by all, then why do today’s liberals want so much to remove liberty and equality from anyone who doesn’t blindly follow them?

Conservatives wander from the their own belief system, once minding their own business, letting others alone while enjoying their own individualism. Conservatives of today are as bent on stopping the liberties of liberals and progressives as liberals and progressives are in stopping the conservatives. What a mess!

It should become clear that all of these political ideologies are skewed and have reached a point where they are shortly running out of space to coexist. I believe this is all by design, but I recognize that nearly all readers will refuse to accept that premise. I cannot force feed you. It is worth gaining a better understanding, but……

The relentless and ignorant debates about guns, gun violence, gun rights, gun control, because of senseless emotions, works wonderfully as a tool to draw attention from what the debate and the staged events are all about.

If you have yet to even question anything beyond a Left vs. Right, childish yelling and banging head session, it would be impossible for you to learn anything.

 

Share

After Sutherland Springs Church Massacre, Anglican Bishop Considers Arming Himself at the Altar

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Washington, DC/Pine Grove Mills, PA  A man of the cloth in Pennsylvania who also wears a badge is now contemplating packing a pistol in the pulpit to protect his parish.

Bishop Council Nedd II, rector of St. Alban’s Anglican Church in Pine Grove Mills, Pennsylvania and co-chairman of the Project 21 black leadership network, is reassessing security at his church after the mass murder of worshipers at the First Baptist Church in Sutherland Springs, Texas on November 5. Nedd is also a Pennsylvania state constable.

In a commentary published by Project 21, Nedd wrote:

A pistol in the pulpit may sound extreme, but – when people of faith increasingly appear to be targets of armed evil – a good shepherd must do what he must do to protect the flock from the wolves. From my perspective as both a bishop and a cop, people must be protected. This includes in sacred spaces.

Nedd previously chose not to carry a firearm while participating in St. Alban’s services despite credible threats to his own safety and personal experience providing security for other places of worship. Growing religious intolerance is causing him to rethink this personal gun restriction, which he will be discussing with his congregation:

It’s shocking that, in a nation founded on the idea of religious freedom, there are monsters out there who now think it’s fair game to target people of faith with deadly force. I’m no stranger to religious bigotry and the condescension of non-believers, but recent church shootings like those in Charleston, South Carolina; Antioch, Tennessee and this latest one in Sutherland Springs bring intolerance to a frightening new level.

Nedd’s full commentary, “Packing in the Pulpit: This Man of God May Arm Himself to Protect His Flock,” is available for reprint on a free, non-exclusive basis and is available by clicking here.

“I fully support Council Nedd’s change of heart on the presence of firearms in church. It’s only natural to want to preserve the sanctity of the sanctuary. Carrying a firearm in the pulpit as an act of preparation does just that,” said fellow Project 21 co-chairman Stacy Washington, a syndicated talk radio host and U.S. Air Force veteran. “”In light of the increasing frequency of atheists and socialists shooting politically conservative people, whether in ballparks or in churches during services, it’s important to allow those who are properly permitted to carry their concealed weapons into the church. Not only is this lawful, but it is Biblical. Jesus’s disciples carried swords as he directed them to do in Luke22:36: “He said to them, ‘But now if you have a purse, take it, and also a bag; and if you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.'”

 

Washington is a Second Amendment advocate and writer for the National Rifle Association.

Share

When Disarmament is the Goal, Death is the Means

It’s early this morning and I’m going to offer thoughts and information you don’t want to hear. But I don’t care.

If many events that take place in this country are looked at from the perspective that I have carried for many years, that the Powers That Be desire disarmament of the citizen slaves as a necessary part of their overall goals of complete dominance (dictatorial tyranny), and an understanding that man’s life is meaningless to them, perhaps some things might make more sense, albeit savagely evil.

I have stated for many years that the only remaining wall of resistance that protects what is left of our freedoms and liberties is our right to keep and bear arms. It is the one major reason I support that right, plain and simple, without the so-called “reasonable” limits to that right. A right once desirably labeled and recognized as inalienable (unquestioned) is now, not only doled out by man-gods but is vivaciously requested and demanded by a mass of servitude-loving progressives ignorantly eager to be the next victims of the quest, at any cost, for disarmament.

Anyone who cares enough to seek Truth, understands that the Hegelian Dialectic is in full employment. These “dialectical stages of development” consist of thesis, reaction, antithesis. Or, better explained this way: A crisis is created; the creator of that crisis seeks and promotes a reaction from the masses, that is those whose life more resembles what was described by the Romans during the First Century as Bread and Circuses, to keep the masses happy; this is followed by a solution – a solution which was what was sought from the very beginning (disarmament).

Knowing that the Powers seek disarmament, knowing that the Powers do not value your life or mine, knowing that the Powers believe fully in the ends justifying the means, your and my life is certainly considered expendable. There is no other way to look at this.

Over the weekend there was another staged mass murder. Of course the weapon of choice was a gun or guns and right on cue the puppet regime of the Ruling Establishment began their systematic chants for disarmament. Watching these events over the years, which seem to closely follow someone’s written script, I am left with no other thought than that these are staged, i.e. they are the thesis. Immediately following the event emotional embellishment is promoted, both by the Powers and by the ignorant puppets, or useful idiots (reaction), pushed by the Media. The solution, although immediately demanded by politicians and others, has not yet come. The push back is still strong enough to hold them off for now. This will not last forever because there are too many people brainwashed into the belief that “reasonable” gun control laws are necessary. Perhaps the question might be, necessary for what?

The majority of mass murders in this country are staged. People do not want to hear nor even consider this idea, nor are they willing to admit the country, the government they love, the one they salute, that they pledge allegiance to, the same one they are willing to fight and die for, is so corrupt, or corrupted by the Powers that Be, that they would be the creators of such heinous acts as marching into a church and gunning down a group of people. And this is why it continues and is so successful. Keep thinking that way and for certain the mass shootings will continue.

Recently I made commentary on the mass murder in Las Vegas, referring to Stephen P. Halbrook’s theory of “Benignity and Progressive” in referring to the proposal and passage of gun restriction bills. I wrote: “Through all of this, bear in mind that in order for benignity to remain and progress, each successive crisis must be bigger and greater than the last. The servitude become desensitized with each event, thus forcing the perpetrators to increase the effect.”

In order for the Hegelian Dialectic to remain effective, each successive staged event must be somehow greater and/or hit closer to home. As strange as it might sound, there is something a bit distant in one’s mind when considering a mass murder in the city of sin of Las Vegas, at an event the overwhelming majority of Americas, would not and could not attend. But stage such an event in a church in a sleepy Texas town of less than 400 people and it begins to hit close to home. There’s a good possibility that the majority of attendees to that church support the Second Amendment. That’s hitting close to home and kicking a bit below the belt.

We have seen efforts for disarmament backfire, which is still a good thing. So long as there remains those who ardently fight against the emotional clap-trap always associated with violent crime, the process of disarmament is slowed. Not only do those who push back against disarmament need to keep up the fight, but they need to stop playing into the arms of the disarming fascists and cease with watering down the Second Amendment. No other right is attacked and diluted like the Second Amendment. Why do we put up with it?

Remember, “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly governors, the princes of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness, which are in the high places.” Ephesians 6:12

Your government and the Powers that Be are corrupt to the very core. It is time for you to begin to recognize that. Man’s creations can be nothing other than evil and corrupt. God told us this was so. He told us not to be a part of it. He told us to “Come out of her” (Mystery Babylon).

Let’s stop enabling and perpetuating the Evil.

Share

Orchestrated Mass Murder: Fear and Hysteria Creates Benignity and Progressivism

Gary Marbut, head of Montana Shooting Sports Association, sent out the following email listing all the bills proposed before the House and Senate to destroy the Second Amendment. A reaction from the Las Vegas “shooting.”

U.S. House of Representatives

HR 3947 – Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm

HR 3962 – Bans online sales of ammunition

HR 3984 – Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers

HR 3986 – Would require the placement of tracking ID into ‘all’ firearms sold in America

HR 3987 – Would require a fee to purchase a firearm through NICS and use these monies to fund the CDC to conduct research on gun violence that was previously found to be biased by Congress

HR 3998 – Bans firearms for known or ‘suspected’ terrorists

HR 3999 – Bans parts that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm

HR 4018 – Institutes a ‘3’ day waiting period nationally for purchase of handgun

HR 4025 – Expands reporting of multiple firearms sales

HR 4052 – Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)

HR 4057 – Expansion of Prohibition for firearms ownership for being on a Terrorist Watch List

U.S. Senate

  1. 1915– Would require all firearms to be personalized for restricted access and use
  2. 1916– Bans parts and accessories that increase the rate of fire of a semi-automatic firearm
  3. 1923– Expands background checks of firearms
  4. 1939– Repeals the Lawful Protection in Commerce law that would allow lawsuits against FFL’s and manufacturers
  5. 1945– Would ‘ban’ possession and transfer of large capacity magazines (More than 10 rounds)

Of course few know anything about real history and how Nazi Germany so easily disarmed, first the Jews and locked them up in concentration camps and then systematically murder thousands of them, followed by a total disarmament of the citizenry.

Mark Alexander of the Patriot Post offers a “Bullet Point Reality Check” on living with guns, interesting data about guns and violence and a comparative look at gun related deaths and other killers, of which Congress and other fascists remain silent about. The bullet points are interesting but in today’s America, data and facts are no longer considered in our post normal, insane world.

Lloyd Billingsley, from Front Page Magazine, offers a bit more in depth look at the eerily similar steps being taken by members of Congress that closely follow what the German Weimar Republic did which set the stage and opened the door wide for Adolph Hitler’s Nazism and the disarming of the citizenry.

For an even deeper examination of the German history of disarmament, read Stephen P. Halbrook’s, Nazi Firearms Law and the Disarming of German Jews.

Halbrook points out right away that, “German firearm laws and hysteria created against Jewish firearm owners
played a major role in laying the groundwork for the eradication of German Jewry in
the Holocaust.”

If I may, let me focus a moment on hysteria. Fear and hysteria have always been important and integral necessities in controlling the masses. A fearful servitude will do anything they are told. Those whose bent is the control of people, do everything they can to keep the masses scared.

When events like in Las Vegas take place, fear within the globs of non-thinking automatons is reinforced and topped off with much hysteria – the more the better. This accomplishes or allows for the accomplishment of many things.

In a November, 2013 article published in the Washington Times, Halbrook is quoted as saying, “Today, gun control, registration and prohibition are depicted as benign and progressive.” When the subjects are constantly being bombarded with fear mongering tactics and events that create hysteria, which today most any political action is causing hysteria, is it any wonder that any form of gun control is viewed by the masses as “benign and progressive?” This is evident when, from both sides of the false paradigm of “Left” and “Right,” all that is ever spoken is the need for “reasonable” gun control laws, while never attempting to define reasonable. I’m sure the masses must have considered the Weimar Republic’s gun control laws reasonable at that time.

If it were possible to strip away all the fear and hysteria that drives and controls our every day, perhaps some could begin to see how thoroughly our man-given rights and those once considered inalienable, have been destroyed. And for what?

So much so our government, who, in my opinion, are about as useless and undesirably corrupt as Al Capone in his day, rushes in, as shown above in Gary Marbut’s email, with Nazi-esque bills to take full advantage of the programmed hysteria that has irresponsibly taken over the masses, a reasonable person would have to ask if it isn’t Congress, i.e. the “Ruling Establishment” that controls Congress, who are perpetuating the events that cause the fear and hysteria.

Through all of this, bear in mind that in order for benignity to remain and progress, each successive crisis must be bigger and greater than the last. The servitude become desensitized with each event, thus forcing the perpetrators to increase the effect.

Benign and progressive! Isn’t progressivism possible because planned events that seemingly become progressively horrific tend to create a dumbing down effect and thus with each successive event the previous becomes more and more benign?

We refuse to see our Government as anything that closely resembles that of Nazi Germany. This is, of course, part of the “benign and progressive” society we have been programmed to accept. All the indicators are there. And when events like Las Vegas happen, how soon we forget what President Obama’s former White House Chief of Staff said during the heat of the financial “crisis” in 2008 – “You never let a serious crisis go to waste. And what I mean by that it’s an opportunity to do things you think you could not do before.”

The Left claims the Right takes Emanuel’s quote out of context saying that he didn’t mean to use a crisis for political gain. What other reason can there be? However, it doesn’t really matter. To an honest person, anyone who would make such a statement, in any context, and in the position of power that they hold, is only revealing reality. The intent is “to do things you think you could not do before.” And thus, “progressive” members of Congress go about to disarm their citizenry.

Which brings us right back to the question of whether or not those fomenting the fear and hysteria are those same one’s offering up the Nazi-type legislation?

There is little reason to think this isn’t exactly what is taking place. This fits the Hegelian Dialectic to a tee – thesis, reaction, antithesis. To put this dialectic in Las Vegas terms (or place here any of the “crises” of past years), the event is orchestrated. Fear and hysteria sets in. “Never let a serious crisis go to waste.” Embellishment to pump up the reaction, readying the masses for a pre-planned response. Those who created the crisis, rush in with a solution, i.e. thesis, reaction, antithesis – noting that the solution contradicts the created problem.

Far fetched? You’ll have to decide. Regardless of the outcome of the proposal of the anti-gun bills in Congress, one thing is for certain. Gun control and the destruction of the Second Amendment, the only roadblock to full Communism and Dictatorial rule, will become even more benign and progressive. To accomplish that, events (crises) will become more horrific and/or occur more often.

Share