January 20, 2022

YAHUSHA Is The Truth/Light

Share

Ye Men Shall Put On More Adornment Than a Woman

I chuckled aloud last night as I was reading in The Book of Enoch, in Chapter 3 of the Wisdom of Enoch and verses 10 and 11.

Enoch, the “seventh from Adam” suddenly just disappeared one day. Enoch, along with Elijah were the only two men throughout history (no longer on this earth) who have yet to experience a physical, fleshly death. The Scriptures indicate that both men will soon be returning to earth as the Almighty EL’s “witnesses” who will do battle with the Antichrist in the “End of Days.”

Enoch, being the seventh from Adam, would tell us, probably 5,000 years or so ago, that in a vision from the Almighty, he wrote what he was revealed by the Lord God and his angels. Imagine, if you can, the thoughts of anyone who read this description of “men” in the end of days some 5,000 years ago.

And yet, here we are, where men dress as women and act like women, and, for the most part, it is considered “normal.”

Further proof we are living in the Last Days.

“10. And now I swear unto you, to the wise and to the foolish for ye shall have manifold experiences on the earth.

“11. For ye men shall put on more adornments than a woman and colored garments more than a virgin; In royalty and in grandeur and in power, and in silver and in gold and in purple, and in splendor and in foot they shall be poured out as water.”

Share

Are YOU an Accidental Satanist?

Share

The Divining Serpent Messaging Through Human Host Muppet Shows

Share

A Man Clothed in Fine Garments

From the Gospel of Thomas, verse 78: “Jesus said, “Why have you come out into the desert? To see a reed shaken by the wind? And to see a man clothed in fine garments like your kings and your great men? Upon them are the fine garments, and they are unable to discern the truth.”

Let’s examine this verse as it would pertain in this post-normal, strongly Satanic-influenced world/society.

Jesus asked, “Why have you come out into the desert?” What is the desert in this spiritual context? The desert is generally a waterless place, void of life, i.e. a place lacking the true spiritual knowledge of the Word of God.

Jesus wanted to know if they (you/anyone) came to “see a reed shaken by the wind?” Why would there be a reed in the desert? Maybe this “reed” is “dressed in fine garments,” disguised. A reed is something that is most often found in water (Word of God). It might appear that you are trying to find something in the wrong place. Water is not in the desert.

Let’s look closer at what a reed is. A reed, one generally found where there is water, in ancient Egypt, these areas where reeds grew in the water were called a “bulrush” or “bullrush.” There are different species of reeds, but in Egypt the most common reed, from the bullrushes, were identified as the source of papyrus – according to Etymology Online: “…bullrush, popular name for tall rush-like plants growing in or near water (in Biblical use, the Egyptian papyrus).”

We know that papyrus was used in ancient times for paper, scrolls, to write things on. It is actually where the term “bible” comes from: Greek, biblion (paper, scroll).

It then appears that what Jesus is asking is if you are looking for the Word of God (Bible, Canon, i.e. reed), where there is no water (Word of God). But also, Jesus describes the “reed” as “shaken by the wind.” If this “reed” is the canonical (readily accepted scriptures by order of church leaders, Scribes, Pharisees, lawyers,) Scriptures, it is “shaken” by the wind of the Logos (God’s complete word/doctrine).

Evidently, the seekers came to the desert to find their (man-gods) kings and great men, who are all in collusion to bastardize the Word of God and to hide Truth from and deny as many as they can. These kings and great men are described as wearing “fine garments,” i.e. well disguised in what they do but incapable of knowing the real Truth.

And yet, we insist in turning our hopes to these corrupt kings and great men wandering the the desert, being shaken by the Almighty EL.

Seek (the complete Son of God) and you will find. He won’t be in the desert.

Share

Type “demons” Backwards

Share

Your Flesh Is The Devil

666 – Electron – Proton – Neutron . Welcome to the knowledge of what the BIBLE proves is your Host Body.. Born in the flesh.. Hopefully reborn into the SPIRIT of the TRUTH. The TRUTH being the LIGHT of this dark world, EmmanuEL shepherding us home to the one and only ALMIGHTY EL.

Share

Law of Nations International Law Commandments of Men NO IMMUNITY

Matthew 16:25 1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)

25 For whosoever will save his life, shall lose it: and whosoever shall lose his life for my sake, shall find it.


Matthew 16:25 Shall gain himself: And this is his meaning, they that deny ImmanuEL to save themselves, do not only not gain that which they look for, but also lose the thing they would have kept, that is themselves, which loss is the greatest of all: but as for them that doubt not to die for ImmanuEL , it fareth far otherwise with them.

Share

Draconian Tyrannical Cleverness Laid Bare

The Law of Nations and the moral perfectability of mankind are of course notions of a fictitious nature… The Game of Fools is the belief in ‘fictitious entities’, such as corporations. But it is more foolish to believe in the prime fictitious entity; the customary and traditional commandments of man made ‘government’. A law unto themselves. The historical record proves a 100% failure rate.. Silly Determinists want to try it again…

The facts about the law of nations and international law exposing the COTUS for what that political charter in reality is, is not a communist plot to destroy the COTUS or the republican minimalist form of government that document allegedly represented. The Posterity does not want to destroy their authority over their slave plantation. Constitutiones or Constitutio in Black’s Law means “Roman Imperial Law”….therefore Constitutions were passed for centuries by Caesars and Kings…and Popes. Any man contracted to and indebted to in any Representative System has accepted a Limited Liability way of life; they are not practicing freedom, they are being subjugated by Aristocrats. By the actual legal bloodlines Posterity of the original signatories whom founded that politically chartered Representative System.. In this particular Representative System, the owners of the system own all properties.. Pay off a piece of land and they still send their wolves to your door for tribute don’t they? And if you can’t pay the tribute they take you off that land.. Thats hardly freedom and is certainly not worth fighting over… Here’s the basis of your communitarian society right out of the document used to establish the COTUS slave colony Plantation;

The Taxation Mere User fee keeps on getting higher and higher…Lawfulness of the Law of Nations concerning societies as well…

“The ultimate ownership of all property is in the State; Individual so-called “ownership” is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law, amounting to mere user; and use must be in accordance with law and subordinate to the necessities of the State.” Senate Document #43; SENATE RESOLUTION NO. 62 [Pg 9, para 2] April 17, 1933.

The U.S. has been implementing the Law of Nations and International Law..

The COTUS states that International Law is the Supreme Law of the land. Thus International law = Jurisdiction thus ‘Jurisdiction refers to the power of a state to affect persons, property, and circumstances within its territory.’ Thus to manage private and public properties to the benefit of the state..

The Bill of Rights never was the Supreme Law of the Land.. Just the placement of and amending process places that Bill in the subservient legal position of the International Law and of the COTUS.. The Unionization of the estates-now the fifty Colonies to one sovereign, the Congress acting as plenipotentiary’s to a supreme sovereign authority.. Now who could that be… It is the Vatican..

Book 2 law of nations § 81. The property of the citizens is the property of the nation, with respect to foreign nations.
Even the property of the individuals is, in the aggregate, to be considered as the property of the nation, with respect to other states. It, in some sort, really belongs to her, from the right she has over the property of her citizens, because it constitutes a part of the sum total of her riches, and augments her power. She is interested in that property by her obligation to protect all her members. In short, it cannot be otherwise, since nations act and treat together as bodies in their quality of political societies, and are considered as so many moral persons. All those who form a society, a nation being considered by foreign nations as constituting only one whole, one single person, — all their wealth together can only be considered as the wealth of that same person.

That means All property thus all of the FRNs in your pocket belongs to them, they’re simply taking a fee for you using their property.. And the fee keeps going up and up and up…

“The law of nations is the law of sovereigns. It is principally for them, and for their ministers, that it ought to be written. All mankind are indeed interested in it; and, in a free country, the study of its maxims is a proper employment for every citizen; but it would be of little consequence to impart the knowledge of it only to private individuals, who are not called to the councils of nations, and who have no influence in directing the public measures. If the conductors of slates, if all those who are employed in public affairs, condescended to apply seriously to the study of a science which ought to be their law, and, as it were, the compass by which to steer their course, what happy effects might we not expect from a good treatise on the law of nations! We every day feel the advantages of a good body of laws in civil society: — the law of nations is, in point of importance, as much superior to the civil law, as the proceedings of nations and sovereigns are more momentous in their consequences than those of private persons….”
“…But fatal experience too plainly proves how little regard those who are at the head of affairs pay to the dictates of justice, in conjunctures where they hope to find their advantage. Satisfied with bestowing their attention on a system of politics which is often false, since often unjust, the generality of them think they have done enough when they have thoroughly studied that. Nevertheless, we may truly apply to states a maxim which has long been acknowledged as true with respect to individuals, — that the best and safest policy is that which is founded on virtue. Cicero, as a great master in the art of government as in eloquence and philosophy, does not content himself with rejecting the vulgar maxim, that “a state cannot be happily governed without committing injustice;” he even proceeds so far as to lay down the very reverse of the proposition as an invariable truth, and maintains, that “without a strict attention to the most rigid justice, public affairs cannot be advantageously administered.”

Providence occasionally bestows on the world kings and ministers whose minds are impressed with this great truth. Let us not renounce the pleasing hope that the number of those wise conductors of nations will one day be multiplied; and in the interim let us, each in his own sphere, exert our best efforts to accelerate the happy period.” ~ [Emmerich de Vattel, The Law of Nations]

Law Of Nations
§ 32. It may reform the government. If any nation is dissatisfied with the public administration, it may apply the necessary remedies, and reform the government. But observe that I say “the nation;” for I am very far from meaning to authorize a few malcontents or incendiaries to give disturbance to their governors by exciting murmurs and seditions. None but the body of a nation have a right to check those at the helm when they abuse their power. When the nation is silent and obeys, the people are considered as approving the conduct of their superiors, or at least finding it supportable; and it is not the business of a small number of citizens to put the state in danger, under the pretense of reforming it.
§ 33. And may change the constitution. In virtue of the same principles, it is certain that it the nation is uneasy under its constitution, it has a right to change it. There can be no difficulty in the case, if the whole nation be unanimously inclined to make this change. But it is asked, what is to be done if the people are divided? In the ordinary management of the state, the opinion of the majority must pass without dispute for that of the whole nation: otherwise it would be almost impossible for the society ever to take any resolution. It appears then, by parity of reasoning, that a nation may change the constitution of the state by a majority of voles; and whenever there is nothing in this change that can be considered as contrary to the act of civil association, or to the intention of those united under it, the whole are bound to conform to the resolution of the majority. (22) But if the question be, to quit a form of government to which alone it appeared that the people were willing to submit on their entering into the bonds of society, — if the greater part of a free people, after the example of the Jews in the time of Samuel, are weary of liberty, and resolved to submit to the authority of a {sovereign} monarch, — those citizens who are more jealous of that privilege, so invaluable to those who have tasted it, though obliged to suffer the majority to do as they please, are under no obligation at all to submit to the new government: they may quit a society which seems to have dissolved itself in order to unite again under another form: they have a right to retire elsewhere, to sell their lands, and take with them all their effects.
Law of Nations; or, Principles of the law of Nature: applied to the conduct and affairs of nations and sovereigns –1750 – Emerich. de Vattel

Article I Section 8 – Powers of Congress ~ To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations;
Do you know what the Offences against the Law of Nations are? If not, how do you know what your duties and obligations as a citizen are? I invite you all to ask around. Ask any of the Constitutionalists if they have ever read the Law of Nations. Because when the Framers referenced this book, by mere reference to it they incorporated the entire Law of Nations into the Constitution.

Article VI – Debts, Supremacy, Oaths ~ All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
Meaning there is no disputing the debts of the United States.


~ This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.

Meaning they knew they were going to be passing more laws and signing Treaties with other Nations, and all of these treaties in international law, shall be the supreme “Law of the Land”, and the Judges are upholding international law and upholding the Constitution when they do.

Article I Section 8 – Powers of Congress

~ To make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.


What is “necessary and proper”? Anything they want it to mean. There is no such thing as an unconstitutional law because if it got passed it had to be “necessary and proper”.

“The ultimate authority denoted by the term “sovereignty” also has both an internal and an external aspect. Internally, state sovereignty designates effective legal and political authority over a determinate state territory and its inhabitants. From an external perspective, state sovereignty primarily denotes both a substantial level of freedom from control or interference by external authorities and a recognized capacity to enter into contracts and treaties with other states.” – Sovereignty and the common good, International Journal of Constitutional Law Vol 17, Issue 1 January 2019

What do those clever word and term sovereigns have everyone doing? Advocating for a continuation of how things really are. Advocating for slavery, being bondmen under the subjugation of freemen. Advocating for documents of slavery, namely the constitution of the U.S. and of the UNEP and Earth Charter/CONTRACT tome’s which are depopulation plans for bondmen.. Sustainable Development for a continuation of how things are, to preserve sustain their power and ownership of all this earth..

Having all of these tomes the correct claim would be having a sound education concerning the customs and traditions commandments of men is essential in determining the lawlessness of natural men in nature versus the lawfulness of men spiritually awakened to the discerned truthfulness of the Almighty H410 EL..

All through the historical record citizens have been slaves under the Law of Hammurabi Babylonian judgment system. Throughout history the judgment and the captivity of israel is always by Babylonian captivity. It doesn’t matter if it’s Summeria, Egypt, Rome, Greece or the U.K. US. U.N. Babylonian System, it’s always the same system of codes and statutes and that’s the code of the dead. Not living in the Law of the Most High H410 God EL.. The system of men is lawlessness..

[Sylvester, supra note 55, at 67; see also Stewart Jay, The Status of the Law of Nations in Early American Law, 42 VAND. L. REV. 819, 823 (1989) (“In ascertaining principles of the law of nations, lawyers and judges of that era relied heavily on continental treatise writers, Vattel being the most often consulted by Americans. An essential part of a sound legal education consisted of reading Vattel, Grotius, Pufendorf, and Burlamaqui, among others.”).]

Casuistry/sophism is an aspect of a piece of political philosophy for political purpose writing that is deliberately written so that the average reader will understand it as saying one (“exoteric”) thing but the special few for whom it is intended will grasp its real (“esoteric”) meaning. We could call it Double Speak. Only it’s much worse. It’s to easy to decode the Double Speak so they’ve implemented English Hebrew Alphanumerical coding into their clever communications. Somebody might want to tell the English Anglish literal experts..

What needs to be thoroughly appreciated is this, Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions and has done so for centuries.. The Politically Chartered Corporate Countries are therefore, The Great Trading Corporations of their Owners, the Signatories and their Posterity. Societies within societies via a pecking order of political charters.. It all goes right back to that Law of Nations.. And the status between sovereigns and citizens serving them.. If it can be found it is worth the read;

A treatise on the law of private corporations by Elliott, Charles B. (Charles Burke), 1861-1935; Abbott, Howard S. (Howard Strickland), 1864-1944
Published 1911..

The word country is synonymous with the word corporation.. The citizen is The juristic person, ‘the juristic person’ will always remain a fiction attaching itself to the fictitious jurisdictional territory belonging to the Sovereign Owners of a personally owned private fictitious trading corporate country as a business, regardless of the wishful thinking of mere respected opinion. Opinion being of course the fictitious imaginings of an individual, whether or not that fiction is shared by others. For the ‘juristic person’ to attach to those to be found in the physical world under the authority of ‘true’ Natural Law and its true Rule of Law, requires their ‘membership’ to the traditions-of-men whose traditions are, of course, merely fictions; and that would require individuals to ‘knowingly’ consent to membership. UNFORTUNATELY ‘knowing consent’ should necessitate ‘full-disclosure’ for there to be legitimacy in not falling foul of conditions that nullify and void (null and void) any arrangements entered into without it.. This is not the case.. Once snared it is extremely difficult to release oneself..

The laws of the above ground locusts serving the Angel of the Bottomless Pit..

Where does President Donald Trump and the world’s mainstream, media, academia, and publishing, feature in this alleged historical picture of “freedom”? President Donald Trump’s job like previous Presidents and with all U.S. politicians past and present, together with the world’s mainstream false history gate-keepers and false alternative news opposition, is to simply, consistently, and continuously, deflect this societies and that of the world’s attention by providing distractions to prevent people from scrutinizing and understanding the true workings of Politically Chartered Power and its ambitions by keeping them busy with inconsequential nonsense, as and when it is expedient to do so, including having to use out-right lies to prevent people seeing implemented changes that are fundamentally detrimental to their well-being. It’s a private business, that has no duty of openness to non members.. Citizens are property.. They owe you nothing.. Not even an honest explanation of who and what they are..

“We have discovered a location in America that contains all of the occult symbols we just covered- in one place. This is the manifestation of Lucifer’s spiritual minions working through unwitting human vessels, creating a monument to display his temporary global dominance of Earth. Which will ultimately culminate in his short-term One World Government spoken of in the Bible, known simply as the New World Order. You need to find Jesus before the calamities strike, for they will strike fierccely and suddenly- and out of the ashes of America shall arise this New Order of the Ages (NOVUS ORDO SECLORUM).” —Jon Kleck

Share

Flat Earth Court Case FINALLY done after plaintiff tries to sue THREE times

Share