July 20, 2017

The Great Priests Of Scientism Have Their Double Speak Say

Share

Environmentalism’s Relationship With Eugenics And Big Banking Undeniable;

“Malthus has been vindicated, reality is finally catching up with Malthus. The Third World is overpopulated, it’s an economic mess, and there’s no way they could get out of it with this fast-growing population. Our philosophy is: back to the village.” –Dr. Arne Schiotz, World Wildlife Fund Director of Conservation, 1984

“If we look at things causally, the bigger problem in the world is population. We must set a ceiling to human numbers. All development aid should be made dependent on the existence of strong family planning programs.” –Sir Peter Scott, chairman, World Wildlife Fund U.K., 1984

“We are bound in justice and honour formally to disdain the Right of the poor to support. “To this end, I should propose a regulation to be made, declaring that no child born from any marriage taking place after the expiration of a year from the date of the law, and no illegitimate child born two years from the same date, should ever be entitled to parish assistance…. “The infant is, comparatively speaking, of little value to society, as others will immediately supply its place.” –Thomas Malthus, An Essay on the Principle of Population

“The white population of the world will soon cease to increase. The Asiatic races will be longer, and the negroes still longer, before their birth rate falls sufficiently to make their numbers stable without help of war and pestilence. Until that happens, the benefits aimed at by socialism can only be partially realized, and the less prolific races will have to defend themselves by methods which are disgusting even if they are necessary.” –Bertrand Russell

“I have already spoken of the population problem, but a few words must be added about its political aspect. …. It will be impossible to feel that the world is in a satisfactory state until there is a certain degree of equality, and a certain acquiescence everywhere in the power of the World Government, and this will not be possible until the poorer nations of the world have become … more or less stationary in population. The conclusion to which we are driven by the facts that we have been considering is that, while great wars cannot be avoided until there is a World Government, a World Government cannot be stable until every important country has nearly stationary population.” –Bertrand Russell

I have no problem with science for the sake of science. Unfortunately, and this is not a recent occurrence, science has been perverted by politics and big money and used as a tool to promote an agenda whether it be one for pseudo environmentalism, idealism, political power, or greed, or a combination thereof. It’s the very system itself, where scientists are very much in the same boat as, for example, artists who depend on financial donors in order to continue their work. I have no idea how to solve this, I just see it as a problem. When money comes through the door science goes out the window. The “sciences” these New Age environmental advocates preach for are all affiliated with The International Bankers, the International Monetary Fund, and World Bank. The International Bankers have always been behind all the worlds philosophical and economic concepts and even the trend of going green, is really their idea and no doubt, they will be the ultimate beneficiaries. That should be a huge red flag for all concerned.. Just follow the money.. Environmentalist Corporate Controlled Opposition is simply all radical environmentalist groups, Club of Rome Clones, Sierra Club, and various offshoot groups such as the Western Watersheds Project Group, Cascadia Wild Group, The affiliate Wildlife News website, and others who are pushing a political agenda which is really a disguised economic agenda that benefits the Invisible Corporate Rulers behind this think which merely operates off sheer greed and profit motive incentives shrouded in the sanctity of possessing aspirations of saving mother earth, wildlife, bio-diveristy, which appears to be in tune with saving mankind and all other vital life forms. But many of these advocates do not have a clue about this small powerful invisible minority who are behind wrecking the national and the world economies. I’ve certainly tried to discuss this with them and they refuse, they mock and add hom bomb.. They ignore by placing their hands over their ears, closing their eyes, and hiding out in closed comment arenas where they are protected by censoring thugs. The actions of immature childish backwards thinkers.

I’ve concluded that the leaders of the groups listed above know whats up.. They approve of it.. Depopulation of people to save the environment.. Or the ecosystem or the earth.. Eugenics and even genocide.. Their own behavior and suppression of evidence against what they promote speaks volumes about their advocacy.

The proof is in various United Nations Publications.

“The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT…was previously known by the names Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves and Royal Society for Nature Conservation.”

History – The forerunner of the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, was established by Charles Rothschild in 1912. It aimed initially to draw up a list of the country’s best wildlife sites with a view to purchase for protection as nature reserves, and by 1915 it had drawn up a list of 284, known as Rothschild Reserves.” Source: Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts. Nathaniel Charles Rothschild (9 May 1877 – 12 October 1923), known as “Charles”, was an English banker and entomologist and admitted eugenicist and a member of the Rothschild family. And – The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves.. – Climate Change & Wildlife – The Wildlife Trusts – And takes us to Giammaria Ortes: The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”.. World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF) World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) Founders –Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld – Julian Huxley – Max Nicholson – Peter Scott – Guy Mountfort – Godfrey A. Rockefeller – The Windsors.. All ideologies being carried forth via their Posterity of which both sides of the current issue involving wild lands and wildlife have been indoctrinated with, segments of at least. This was not a new idea brought on by the current environmental “crisis” they’ve beguiled everyone  with.. These people were claiming over population 100 years ago and longer.. And what else were they connected with? Eugenics, sterilization, genocides via their war creation.. Sustainable Development’, is a cruel deception in which a vast majority of people on both sides of this issue are combating each other over resources management , as victims of its ‘doublespeak hidden agenda’, thus work towards their own elimination, with the enslavement of the surviving few, housed in concentration camp ‘smart growth’ community dwellings, serving the rest of their miserable lives as serfs..

Corporate Controlled Opposition Environmentalists AND Corporate Controlled Opposition of the Environmental group opposition from the framing ranching hunting sector are being played like the proverbial fiddle..

They are pulling the plug on the economy as we speak, and you are going to see large banks buying out smaller ones left and right. Look for the Fed to cut interest rates and print more money. It’s all a scam. They are consolidating the market. The same people in control of the banks who will be swallowing the competition are the same people in control of the Fed, which is a PRIVATE entity, not a governmental body. The Congress gave control over the monetary policy of the United States to the private Federal Reserve (think Federal Express) in 1913, the same year the Federal Income Tax was created to pay the newly created debt to the Federal Reserve. They own the world and are starting to consolidate. They don’t need us anymore. There’s no reason to keep billions of people alive when they own nearly all wealth and assets. They want you dead because you are now wasting their valuable resources.

Who funded this book? The World Bank that owns the Federal Reserve and the IMF did;

This is the new warfare.. Clever, deceptive, false hope, false promises.. Double Speak designed to bring us all death..

There is no push back.. Everywhere I read the people are in total self defeat..  All victims of the domination of mass media and alternative media-distributed disinformation..

Share

Sustainable Pedophilia Too

Entertaining Eugenocide – looky I made a term.. Or Eugenicide;

From The New American;

“The United Nations “Human Rights Council,” which counts some of the world’s most ruthless dictatorships as members, sparked global outrage last week by voting to appoint a UN czar to oversee the normalization of homosexuality and transgenderism around the world.

…According to the UN’s propaganda service, the discredited UN “Human Rights Council” debated the measure for almost four hours on June 30 before adopting the scheme in a contentious vote. Just 23 member governments and regimes voted in favor of creating the new czar, while 18 voted against and six abstained. The measure was pushed forward by a tight-knit network of communist and socialist governments in Latin America with close ties to Marxist terrorist groups, Western globalists, Moscow, and Beijing. A number of European governments and other members of the “LGBT Core Group,” which includes Obama and the EU, also played a key role in pushing the scheme from outside the UN “human rights” outfit.“For the first time, work on this issue [normalizing homosexuality and transgenderism] will be effectively institutionalized at the Human Rights Council,” the UN said….”

…”celebrated as a “great step forward for human rights in the United States.” “The measures he advocated here — including new laws to protect people from discrimination — are the same measures that, today, we advocate to governments everywhere.” Ironically, the praise for the child rapist came even as the UN’s “peace” armies were facing global outrage for systematically raping and sexually exploiting children around the world.

 

Yeah, I really want the U.N.s advise on environmental policies…

Share

Doing This Job Because It Needed Doing

If you’re going to do a job do it. Go all the way or don’t even start it.. What is UNEP – A. 2100? Their Global Revolution Community in its entirety.. Who is behind it, who works for who is behind it.. All of it.. the whole enchilada with the maggots falling out of it.. If you’re only looking at the various group facilitator maggots you aren’t doing the job. That means you’re in the distraction category.. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and the Sierra Club groupies are all in the same category.. Along with various save hunting groups that are doing nothing, exposing nothing, just blabbering off rubbish.. I’ve discovered the most apathetic hunter groups are the ones with the biggest mouths, or egos..

What does the term Sustainable Development mean? It means exactly what the creator of that term meant it to mean.. Not what is being misinterpreted by everyone helping to implement sustainable development in various ways using new methods for everything we all do from laws to building to managing land to grazing or hunting.. It means setting up a new economic model that will only sustain a lower population of people objective.

Thus it is a long range new economic method of lowering the population of people who are allegedly over populated and are allegedly exhausting the earths resources and causing a massive extinction of various wildlife species and of people.. People are the cause, people are the direct drivers of this extinction by exhausting resources hypothesis..

The direct drivers.. So they say.. It should be noted that the thinkers behind this concept come from a long line of zoologists, biologists, entomologists, wealthy elites related to well known banking families who openly spoke of eugenics as a necessary scientific process for population control of people.. The process has been re-termed reworded and socially engineered into the citizen minds of this society who do not understand what they are going along with..Because if they knew they were implementing depopulation against themselves they’d be outraged.. That is exactly what sustainable development is, eugenics. Eugenics policies disguised as environmental policies..

Economically starving a society down to an acceptable population objective.. For people.. Who in the fk in their right mind would go along with that?

Complete idiots that’s who..

Only stupid people haven’t realized that the world is run by self serving conniving sons-of-bitches. I say stupid people, not “ignorant”, because the ignorant can learn when they are presented information. One is a stupid person if they are offered the information, and they compulsively hand wave it while claiming they have no interest in that.. Why? Because they are lazy suckers, too stupid to realize they have been conned – over and over again, by the same psychopaths that have run the world for centuries. Tyrants get away with it because they can always count on the lowest common denominator for support..

In the epistemology of the taut linear mind that mind will connect the dots, and find blank areas, and assume that means the dots are not connected down the line at some point. But these dots in fact have a trajectory that can be gleaned from their sequence. So when the trajectory of the connected dots is plotted, one can find the continuation of that trajectory in the dots further down the line. It is in ignoring the trajectories that eventually connect all the dots, that leaves the linear mind baffled frightened or bored by those who understand the points of the individual trajectories and point them out.

Apparently we deserve what we are getting.. Of course this business of creating masses of ignorant people to justify orchestrating their deaths by deceptive clever word term mechanisms is unjust unfair and extremely wicked.. Some of us did our job..

Eugenics, the science of improving the human race by scientific control of breeding, was viewed by a large segment of scientists for almost one hundred years as an important, if not a major means of producing paradise on earth.

Oh looky here! A nifty book all about a sustainable paradise…

Don’t forget now….If I invent a term in international ecclesiastical law it means what I say it means not what I trick you via double speak into believing what I want you to think it means… There are to many of you after all…

Hmmmm.. Might want to rethink on who is the most dishonest organization in the good old USA… A distraction like RMEF or their brother in arms the Sierra Club?  Or somebody bigger than them…

Maybe it’s time to quit looking down at those toes…Turn those eyes upwards a little higher…

Some of us did our job.. We did not lay down..

Share

“RMEF is the most deceptive organization in the U.S.”

REALPOLITIK, that is rule by caveat, not truth nor law. Certainty is a dead mistress.

Rewilding defined is a “a plan for removal of existing infrastructure”= Depopulation of people.. What people? You me us…The idiotic author of the quote used in the title here..{ All groups are pushing endless disinformation-The group responsible for this quote are just as bad as any of them};

The agreements for Agenda 21’s ‘sustainable development’ depopulation of America and the Earth, have not only been entered into through the political charters (constitutions) that establish countries, as with the case of the Republic of The U.S. (commonly abbreviated to United States), but where depopulation is not facilitated directly through their Federal and state constitutions, then depopulation is achieved through international or transnational agreements including non binding agreements while implementing said agreements (classified as treaties, conventions etc.,) having a higher order of precedence to constitutions and therefore taking priority over constitutions as all international law legally does as is stated being the Supreme Law of The land…

It is stated that Agenda 21 is a non binding agreement.. Meanwhile it is being implemented all over the USA and Canada.. And else where.. World wide..

It must be understood, that the heads of various Nation/States may determine that they will enter into agreement with the head of another or in the case of Agenda 21 other Nation/States as all of the United Nations Nation State Members, and where such agreements are struck, the parties to them are obligated to prioritize their Nation/States activities to ensure that the obligations to the agreements they entered into are fulfilled. Thus non binding agreement in the case of Agenda 21 is irrelevant. Sustainable Depopulation for the Development of Population Objectives goals set for people is being implemented worldwide..

“This is in line with the everyday occurrence of any adult having to adjust their priorities in their life to ensure that agreements they enter into with other parties are kept. Of course this will mean they set aside the rules under which they normally operate their households for their own convenience, to prioritize the fulfillment of obligations they willingly decided to make as adults with other parties. In similar manner, the heads of countries as country-households (government), set aside the rules (constitutions) under which they normally operate their country-households, to prioritize the fulfillment of obligations they willingly decided to enter into with other country-households or institutions. That is why treaties, conventions, agreements etc., take priority over constitutions, all of which are categorized as contracts, for the mere fact that they are all formal binding ‘agreements’ – meaning contracts.”—ThereIsNoDebt

Fabricating Consent For The Future You’ll Be Given Whether You Like It Or Not..Engineering consent.. Silent Acquiescence because of failure to comprehend their intentions gives to the minds of the deceivers consent.. If we look closely nobody appears to like it but they keep asking for it.. Apparently they fail to understand that Get Out Of Her That You Not Suffer Her Plagues means don’t look back.. Quit looking back at the dead delivering death.. All governments managed by the U.N. are demonically influenced. Thus we know what possessed men and women talk and appear like.. And those demonically influenced via possession people have a demonically possessed leader.. Sitting in his Palace leading this demonic chaos..So fabricating a future of demise.. many appear to like it right now.. But in the end nobody will like it.

So, is the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation the most deceptive organization in the U.S.? Not hardly.. Not even close.

Agenda 2100 is a set of guidelines for environmental action and social justice established by the United Nations in 1992 at a conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Had you read it you’d know you’re advocating for it.. Agenda 2100 sets out a variety of goals for public policy at all levels and for civic action by non-governmental organizations. These include fair trade practices, sustainable energy and urban development (i.e. more efficient zoning), and debt reduction for the developing world. Redistribution of wealth. Policy levels such as passing codes in order that governmental agencies have more control over what private land owners do on their land than the actual tenant owner.. The document claims many of ours including your activities are unsustainable. Although the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 2100 treaty they are implementing it’s recommendations in all business, economic social what have you.. It is laced all through the new building codes.. Land management codes. Climate Change codes. Population objectives for people, just like wildlife or cattle. Talk about elite think arrogance..

If it doesn’t workout because it is a non binding agreement the agencies experimenting with it cannot be held legally responsible later..Agenda 2100 means the 21st century.. This philosophy has a conclusion set date of full implementation by 2100.. 83 years to go..To no hunting, no grazing, no privately owned property, to the man made Genesis Utopia you anti ranching hunting farming anti multiple use public lands advocates are advocating for.. In fact public lands will closed to the citizens by then.. It is all right there in those documents people never read, and probably could not comprehend if they actually tried.. Source material, 1992 Earth Summit Agenda 21 The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio.. With it’s Statement of Forest Principles so called environmental groups advocate for.. And the United Nations Environmental Policies Global Biodiversity {Perversity} Assessment 1140 pages.. Is it all good intentions? Nope.. Is anything financed by bankers and written by lawyers always a good a thing? Hardly… Is advocating for something you’ve never read and do not fully comprehend dumb? Absolutely… Maybe in 83 years those left alive will have the Nuremberg Trials Part two…

Consistently appealing to the very same personally owned private ‘constitutional devices’ that have brought the people of the world, sleep-walking into the madness of mass world Fascism and genocidal depopulation and irreversible contractual enslavement of the remnant surviving zombies to be left alive is absolute foolishness..

Share

A Conspiracy Of Quotes – Eugenics

Share

Destroyed Ranch Lands Owned By Lowlifes Pics

Several valid reasons to want wolves managed..Even controlled..

 

Share

Coming To A Public School Near You

Share

Same Private Corporate Owners of U.S. Own Russia

So for more than 2000 years now the Devil huffed and puffed ’till he blew his disguise clean off and stands revealed as Rome…

Russia of course being their backup power in case the U.S. turns on them.. Which has not happened..

From ThereIsNoDebt Appendices;

Countries are and can only be sea states / coastal states –

27th July 2015

Rosja: opublikowano now? wersj? doktryny morskiej pa?stwa
http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/rosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa/sxhk3f

Google translator:

Russia: it published a new version of the doctrine of sea state
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiadomosci.onet.pl%2Fswiat%2Frosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa%2Fsxhk3f&edit-text=

What constitutes the country of The Federation of Russia is given to mean –

July 27 2001

“The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal laws and other legal acts
of the Russian Federation, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as of 1982,
international treaties in the domain of the sea activity and use of the resources and
spaces of the World Ocean shall constitute the legal basis of the Sea Doctrine.”

– I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, 1st paragraph, page 2

Download Source:

SEA DOCTRINE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
for the period till 2020
(approved by the President of the Russian Federation on July 27 2001; Order No. 1387)
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjACahUKEwiw7b77tvvGAhXDa3IKHYXEBSA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcaf.ch%2Fcontent%2Fdownload%2F36021%2F527259%2Ffile%2FBM_Arbatov_07_Doctrine_Sea.pdf&ei=xDO2VbD7OMPXyQOFiZeAAg&usg=AFQjCNFBWyZKmRt0FY_8fouzAMAMbv50ZA&bvm=bv.98717601,d.bGQ

Reference Material:

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO SAY THIS
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/there-is-no-other-way-to-say-this/

~

Having learnt that President Putin of the Federation of Russia has made amendments to the ‘Naval Doctrine of Russia’, known also as the ‘Maritime Doctorine’ or ‘Sea Doctrine’, what is of interest, is whether the amendments made change in any way the definition for the Federation of Russia (Russia) as being –

i) a personally owned private fictitious (copywritten) corporate country in the ownership of the Self-Ennobling Ones, which would be the only significant change of any real meaning, or

ii) whether the pretense of countries being independent from each other continues, although

iii) their definitions and copyright reveal that they most certainly do not represent the interests of people to be found in the physical world of the five senses, but that they are the private intellectual property (creations of the mind) of those who directly created them or had them created indirectly by their representatives

Comparison of :

– the definition for the Russian Federation given by, ‘The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)’, with that of

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the Russian state

~

Definition for the Russian Federation given by, The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)

The Definition of the Russian Federation, paragraph 5 –

“The legal basis for maritime doctrine consists of the Constitution of Russian Federation, federal
laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea of 1982, international treaties in the field of maritime activity, the use of
space resources and the oceans.”

– I. General Provisions, 5th paragraph, page 1

Source:

APPROVED
President
Russian Federation
Vladimir Putin
27 July 2001,
Pr-1387
Maritime Doctrine of Russian Federation 2020
http://www.oceanlaw.org/downloads/arctic/Russian_Maritime_Policy_2020.pdf

Source of Origination:

The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO) –
A Service of the Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans
http://www.oceanlaw.org/

~

Parties and Non-Parties to the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/parties-and-non-parties-los-convention

Text of the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/text-los-convention

~

ROLCO Members –

Members and Leadership of the

Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans

Steering Committee:

Alton Frye
Caitlyn Antrim

Executive Director:

Caitlyn Antrim

Members:

John Bellinger, Arnold and Porter; Legal Adviser, Department of State 2005-09

William Brewer, (retired) General Counsel, NOAA, Representative of the Secretary of Commerce to the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea

David Caron, Dean, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London

Patricia Forkan, President (emeritus) Humane Society International

Alton Frye, Council on Foreign Relations (ret)

Lee A. Kimball, Consultant

John Knauss, Administrator of NOAA and Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, 1989-1993

Edward Miles, Professor emeritus, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington

Thomas R. Pickering, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs 1999-2000, US Representative to the United Nations 1989-1992

RAdm. Horace B. Robertson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), Judge Advocate General of the Navy, 1975-1976

David Rockefeller Jr., Philanthropist

Biliana Cicin-Sain, Professor, School of Marine Affairs, University of Delaware

Harry Scheiber Professor of Law, University of California School of Law; Director, Law of the Sea Institute

William H. Taft, IV, Deputy Secretary of Defense 1984-1989, Legal Adviser, US Department of State 2001-2005

John C. Whitehead, Deputy Secretary of State, 1985-89

Adm. Paul A. Yost USCG (Ret.), Commandant, US Cost Guard 1986-1990

Source:

ROLCO Members
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/rolco-members

~

Additional –

January 10, 2015
Russia Overhauls Military Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/policy/2015/01/10/russia-military-doctrine-ukraine-putin/21441759/

Definition of the Russian Federation relating to the Russian military doctrine, paragraph 3 –

3. The legal basis of the Military Doctrine consists of the Russian
Federation Constitution; the generally recognized principles and norms of
international law and Russian Federation treaties in the field of defence,
arms control, and disarmament; federal constitutional laws; federal laws; and
also statutory legal acts of the Russian Federation president and the Russian
Federation Government.

Source:

Text of newly-approved Russian military doctrine
Text of report by Russian presidential website on 5 February
[“The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation” approved by Russian
Federation presidential edict on 5 February 2010]
http://carnegieendowment.org/files/2010russia_military_doctrine.pdf

____

Definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

Link: Text of the 1982 Convention and 1994 Agreement

Definition of Countries given by the United Nations, from bullet pointed paragraph 6 of the preamble, reads –

Desiring by this Convention to develop the principles embodied in resolution 2749 (XXV) of 17 December 1970 in which the General Assembly of the United Nations solemnly declared inter alia that the area of the seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, as well as its resources, are the common heritage of mankind, the exploration and exploitation of which shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole, irrespective of the geographical location of States,

Source:

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
PART XI OF THE CONVENTION
PREAMBLE
http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm

____

Definition of the Federation of Russia given by the Russian state and government –

30 November 1998,
in agreement with Italy –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation and, when used in a geographical sense means its territory, including internal waters and territorial sea, air space over them as well as exclusive economic zone and continental shelf where the Russian Federation has sovereign rights and exercises jurisdiction in conformity with the international and federal law;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/italy.pdf

27 August 1998
in agreement with the Netherlands –

“the Russian Federation” means its territory as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf as defind in its legislation subject to the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/netherlands.pdf

22 May 2014
in agreement with Malta –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation, when used in geographical sense, means all the territory of the Russian Federation and also its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined according to the UN Convention on the law of the seas (1982);
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/Malta_e.pdf

5 May 2005
in agreement with Lithuania –

the term “the Russian Federation”, when used in the geographical sense, means the territory of the Russian Federation as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined in accordance with the international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/lithuania.pdf

19 January 2009
in agreement with Venezuela –

the term “the Russian Federation (Russia)” means the territory of the Russian Federation and includes its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/venezuela.pdf

Sourced:

Applicable Double Taxation Treaties
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/dta/

SOURCED:

The Russian Government – Federal Taxation Service
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/1.html

International Cooperation
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/

____

From news sources :

Definition of the Russian Federation approved by Vladimir Putin (new Maritime Doctrine) –

26 July, 2015

Paragraph 5:

“It is above all a change of the international situation, the situation in the world and, of course, the strengthening of our country as a maritime power,”

Paragraph 6:

The six regional areas – is the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and Antarctica.

Paragraph 7:

Focuses on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. “Atlantic – due to the fact that in recent times is fairly active development of the North Atlantic Alliance and its approach to our borders, to which, of course, the Russian Federation is your answer,” – said Deputy Prime Minister. “The second point is related to the fact that Crimea and Sevastopol reunited with the Russian Federation, and it is necessary to take measures for speedy integration into the economic activity of the Crimea and Sevastopol. And of course, the restoration of the presence of the Russian navy in the Mediterranean Sea“, – he added.

Paragraph 8:

“As for the Arctic, it is caused by several events,” – continued Rogozin.

“In addition, the Arctic for us – it is a free access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans are not limited by anything. And of course, the very richness of the continental shelf that requires careful attention to the development of” – he said.

Paragraph 9:

Particular emphasis is placed in the Marine doctrine on environmental issues. “Because it is important for us not only to develop wealth, but also to preserve them for future generations,” – said the official.

Paragraph 11:

An important part of the doctrine regard to governance issues of maritime activity. It outlined the role of the Marine Board of the Government, verified the competence of other authorities. So now you can start building a list of all the documents planning of maritime activities of the state.

English translations:

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html&usg=ALkJrhjuubBR_tATb1sy1qjVT7qqrmm4MQ

Primary Sourcing:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

NEW EDITION OF MARITIME DOCUMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

* New definition for the Russian Federation given in 45 page document –

link: the edition of the Maritime Doctrine
http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/uAFi5nvux2twaqjftS5yrIZUVTJan77L.pdf

Source:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

From Russian state sources :

Definition of Russia taken from the minutes for the new Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation –

Russian Federation Marine Doctrine

Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

July 26, 2015 16:00Baltiisk
Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

The meeting took place on board the frigate Admiral of the Soviet Navy Gorshkov. Participants included Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov, and Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov.

* * *

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Colleagues, good afternoon.

We have been updating the Russian Federation’s Marine Doctrine. This very complex document’s main aim is to provide our country with an integral, consistent and effective naval policy that will protect Russia’s interests.

The Doctrine has been drafted and approved. This is a big event for our future navy, and for developing our shipbuilding industry, because the main customer – the navy in this case, and the Defence Ministry – formulate their future needs, and the industry must carry out these tasks. Industry adapts to new tasks depending on the needs formulated.

Let me note that for the first time, the Doctrine also includes provisions of a purely social nature. They cover marine medicine, and provisions for improving the health of sailors and the specialists working in the marine field. This is very important. People need to know that from now on, our strategic documents for developing our country’s fleet and navy will address the social aspect too, and will give people what they expect from their service, as they carry out the tasks that face our country today in this very complex and important area.

Let’s now discuss in more detail the Doctrine’s key provisions. Mr Rogozin, you have the floor.

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin: Thank you.

Mr President,

This new draft of the Russian Federation Marine Doctrine is a fundamental document of key importance, setting out our country’s naval policy. In other words, it is one of our country’s strategic planning documents.

The Russian Government’s Marine Board undertook the document’s drafting, with the navy playing the leading role in this work. In all, 15 federal executive agencies and organisations took part in drafting the new Doctrine.

We proposed making changes to the Marine Doctrine adopted back in 2001 for the period through to 2020 for two reasons: above all, the changing international situation; and, of course, strengthening Russia’s position as a sea power.

The Marine Doctrine covers four functional areas and six regional areas. The four functional areas are naval activity, marine transport, marine science, and mineral resources development. The six regional areas are the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian, and Indian Ocean, and we have added Antarctica, as a fair number of events involving Antarctica have taken place of late and this region is of considerable interest to Russia.

The main focus is on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. The reasons for this are the following. We emphasise the Atlantic because NATO has been developing actively of late and coming closer to our borders, and Russia is of course responding to these developments.

The second reason is that Crimea and Sevastopol have been reunited with Russia and we need to take measures for their rapid integration into the national economy. Of course, we are also restoring Russia’s naval presence in the Mediterranean.

As for the Arctic, several events motivate our decision. One is the growing importance of the North Sea Route. Mr President, I reported to you that we have begun work on building a new fleet of atomic-powered icebreakers. Three new atomic icebreakers will be ready for work accompanying ships along the northern route in 2017, 2019, and 2020. Furthermore, the Arctic also assures us free and unhindered access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Then there are the riches of the continental shelf, the development of which calls for an attentive approach.

The Marine Doctrine pays particular attention to environmental issues too, because it is important for us not only to develop these riches, but also to preserve them for future generations.

The Marine Doctrine contains a new section on shipbuilding. This is to a large extent linked to the fact that over these last 10–15 years, we have developed a shipbuilding industry that in terms of naval shipbuilding is doing work on a scale comparable to what was happening during the Soviet period. As for civilian and commercial shipbuilding, we are taking measures to encourage the establishment of private shipbuilding companies, which have demonstrated successful results.

State management of marine activities is an important part of the Marine Doctrine. This section stresses the role of the Government’s Marine Board and clarifies the powers of the other state agencies. Essentially, once you approved the Marine Doctrine, we will be able to start drafting the whole list of planning documents for our country’s marine activities in the short, medium and long term.

That concludes my report.

Vladimir Putin: Are there any comments or questions?

Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov: Mr President,

Let me thank you for this Marine Doctrine’s timely drafting and approval. This is a timely document. It places responsibility on us for its future implementation, and we have already begun this process.

Vladimir Putin: Mr Sidorov, what is the situation with coordination between the army and the navy?

Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov: Mr President, it is hard to talk about coordination when everything works as single whole and unified command. As far as the tasks before us are concerned, the Baltic Fleet is resolving everything together with the Western Military District’s forces.

Regarding the delimitation of certain powers between the naval chief command and the Western Military District’s command, there is full coordination in this area.

Vladimir Putin: Good, thank you.

Primary Sourcing:

* Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation
http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Primary Sourcing english translation:

* Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Text format:
Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
2015-07-26 16:00:00
Baltiisk
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/copy/50060

~

Additional news reference –

28.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/07/28/antagonizing-interpretation-new-russian-maritime-doctrine-misguided.html

____

Results of Comparisons –

The amendments made for the definition of the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious corporate country of the Russian Federation, under the partial executive direction of their president, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, has at best extended their ‘claims’ of owner-ship to include a greater range of maritime (sea) territory than previously defined, corresponding with accompanying ‘claims’ to those natural resources to be found in the waters (seas), the sea-bed and subsoil of those newly defined maritime territories.

____

Conclusion for Comparisons –

The new definition for the Russian Federation, has partially contravened and violated Natural Laws jurisdictional requirements of exclusivity, insofar as the state and government of the Russian Federation quite rightly continue not to make any claims to having authority over the living, who cannot be ordinarily found to reside in the territories of the dead, and who are not subject to man-made laws where the living are to be found in the physical world of the five senses.

This new definition for the Russian Federation is in accord with the historic and current definitions for states and their countries.

____

Further News – relating to Russia and the Law of the Sea

30 July 2012
Vladimir Putin signs law on the Northern Sea Route
http://www.arctic-info.com/news/30-07-2012/vladimir-putin-signs-law-on-the-northern-sea-route

* July 26, 2015
Russia Revises Navy Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/europe/2015/07/26/russia-revises-navy-doctrine/30705553/

07/26/2015
Vladimir Putin approved a new maritime doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru%2Fdoc%2F2776754&edit-text=

Source:

???????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://kommersant.ru/doc/2776754

July 26 2015
Deputy PM: Putin approves addendums to Sea Doctrine
http://tass.ru/en/russia/810815

26.07.2015
Russian Maritime Doctrine Lays Foundation to New Marine Law
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1025068628.html

26.07.2015
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the approval of a new version of Russia’s Maritime Doctrine, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said Sunday.
http://in.sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1015217869.html

27.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150727/1025103129.html

July 27, 2015
Putin’s Maritime Doctrine: Atlantic is the new Black Sea
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/putins-naval-doctrine-atlantic-is-new.html

July 27, 2015
Changes to Russia’s Naval Doctrine
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/changes-to-russias-naval-doctrine.html

27.07.2015
Russian navy to focus on energy-rich Arctic, Atlantic oceans
http://www.dw.com/en/russian-navy-to-focus-on-energy-rich-arctic-atlantic-oceans/a-18609091

Xinhua, July 27, 2015
Russia updates maritime doctrine, criticizing NATO expansion
http://www.china.org.cn/world/2015-07/27/content_36153005.htm

Jul 27, 2015
New naval doctrine, French MPs in Crimea and another NGO leaves Russia
http://www.russia-direct.org/russian-media/new-naval-doctrine-french-mps-crimea-and-another-ngo-leaves-russia

____

Reference Material

Pilot projects on maritime spatial planning in the Russian Federation
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CEwQFjAIahUKEwjtke6_iYbHAhVGgXIKHXazBbk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbullmaritimeinstitute.com%2Ffulltxt.php%3FICID%3D1158321&ei=fci7Va3fGMaCygP25pbICw&usg=AFQjCNGYuKTApjFitk_5YdYsTdzhXGOnzA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.bGQ

http://www.un.org/ru/publications/pdfs/national%20human%20development%20report%20in%20the%20russian%20federation%202010.pdf

page 93, Chapter 10, The Environmental Component of the National Maritime Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic Ocean,
publication: Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean
edited by Paul Arthur Berkman, Alexander N. Vylegzhanin
https://books.google.pl/books?id=0k26BQAAQBAJ&pg=PR3&dq=Environmental+Security+in+the+Arctic+Ocean+edited+by+Paul+Arthur+Berkman,+Alexander+N.+Vylegzhanin&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMI-KiD8YyGxwIV5sByCh2E8AfR#v=onepage&q=Environmental%20Security%20in%20the%20Arctic%20Ocean%20edited%20by%20Paul%20Arthur%20Berkman%2C%20Alexander%20N.%20Vylegzhanin&f=false

RUSSIAN STRATEGIES
IN THE ARCTIC:
AVOIDING A NEW COLD WAR
Moscow, September 2014
http://www.uarctic.org/media/857300/arctic_eng.pdf

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiyskaya_Gazeta

Reference source:

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
http://www.rg.ru/

Share

The Crown Of The Caesars Passes To The Papacy

The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy –

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

Share