September 22, 2018

Weaponized Television Crisis Social Engineering


Social Insecurity Welfare Recipients Classified

When is a Social Security Number not a Social Security Number AND
Will the real Beneficiary please stand up

Two questions arise when looking at the IRS administration Code of Federal Regulations (CFR’s,) which is the title to this article. I start with the IRS code and bold the statement that generates questions..

[Code of Federal Regulations]
[Title 26, Volume 17]
[Revised as of April 1, 2001]
From the U.S. Government Printing Office via GPO Access [CITE: 26CFR301.7701-11]

[Page 604]



Discovery of Liability and Enforcement of Title

Sec. 301.7701-11 Social security number.
For purposes of this chapter, the term social security number means
the taxpayer identifying number of an individual or estate which is
assigned pursuant to section 6011(b) or corresponding provisions of
prior law, or pursuant to section 6109, and in which nine digits are separated by hyphens as follows: 000-00-0000. Such term does not include a number with a letter as a suffix which is used to identify an
auxiliary beneficiary under the social security program. The terms “account number” and “social security number” refer to the same

[T.D. 7306, 39 FR 9947, Mar. 15, 1974] *

Please note that the TERM “Social Security Number” does NOT include a number that has a letter after it, such as an “A”. So a number 123-45-678 is a Social Security number, but 123-45-678 A is not a Social Security number. All Retired people have this letter after their number. Therefore they, by the law above, do not and cannot not use that number and claim it is a Social Security Number. Under the Law as provided, by the regulations, one cannot be asked to supply a Social Security number when he has a letter after the number.

Now the second part is this “auxiliary beneficiary”. I was under the impression that I would be a beneficiary under this program. Every one argues that it is this “beneficiary status” that makes one a “taxpayer.” Apparently, by the very regulation above you are not a beneficiary, only an auxiliary beneficiary. So let us look at some definitions first to put this on a good foundation.

Webster’s 7th Ed. Collegiate Dictionary 1970
Beneficiary= n. one who receives something: as 1.a: the person designated to receive the income of a trust estate b: the person named (as in an insurance policy) to receive proceeds or benefits accruing.

Ballentine’s Law Dictionary 3rd Ed
Beneficiary= A person who receives a benefit or advantage. Cite ommited A person receiving or entitled to receive a gift, a devise, or legacy: a cestui que trust: a person who is entitled to receive or who is receiving profit, benefit, or advantage from;

When is a Social Security Number not a Social Security Number a contract or from an estate.

We all know from US Supreme Court decisions of Fleming v Nestor, Stewart Machine Co.v Davis, and Helvering v Davis in the 1930’s and the Congressional Hearings in 1953 on SS, that SS is not insurance; no one has no vested rights in SS; there is no “account” as all the money goes into the general treasury; IRS considers SS payments a GIFT; SS is a direct “special income tax on employees” and the tax on employers is a “excise tax” and the “two taxes are totally separate,”; “SS is not an accrued property right,”; “employees have no contractual interest in SS” and that “Not a dollar goes into the Account by force of the challenged act alone, unaided by acts to follow.”

So the definitions in the two books given above cannot fit the SS beneficiary but for one aspect-The GIFT. Congress appropriates annually from the general treasury and NOT from a special “account”, SS payments and as the Courts and Congressional Hearings stated, this can be stopped when ever Congress decides it has no money in the General Treasury to make these annual SS payments.

But before you jump to conclusions you forgot about the “auxiliary beneficiary” is NOT the beneficiary. So lets us look at what the term “auxiliary” means.

Auxiliary= n. 1 a: an auxiliary person, group or device; b: a Roman Catholic titular bishop assisting a diocesan bishop and not having a right of succession 2: an auxiliary boat or ship.

Auxiliary= a. 1a: offering or providing help b: functioning in a subsidiary capacity. 3a: SUPPLEMENTARY. (Dictionary emphasis)

Ballentine’s Law Dictionary
Auxiliary= Collateral; incidental; conducive; assisting. See ancillary Ancillary= Subordinate

So this “auxiliary beneficiary” is subordinate to the beneficiary. The CFR did say auxiliary and did not use the bare term beneficiary. Did you ever hear the term used in the fire house or the VFW when referring to the auxiliary? The ladies auxiliary? They are not the firemen nor the vets but are subordinate to them correct? So they assist the firemen and the vets.

We have one other definition for auxiliary and that is Black’s Law 5th Ed
Auxiliary= Aiding; attendant on; ancillary (qv); as, an auxiliary bill in equity, an auxiliary receiver. Synonymous with “subsidiary”.
Subsidiary=Under another’s control. Term is often short for “subsidiary corporation”; i.e. one that is run and owned by another company which is called a “parent.” Of secondary importance.

Just on this basis alone, with what we have to go by, the facts show that the recipients are only the auxiliary of the true beneficiary. Why not say just beneficiary? Now who might that be? Could it be the Congress that took all your contributions and used them as they saw fit when your contributions all went into the General Treasury so they could do what they wanted? Could you, who collect SS, be getting the bone minus the meat so to speak? Much like the auxiliary of the Vet or Firemen get a small portion of the total donations and the firemen get to use the majority for equipment? You all must know that “contributions” are really forced exactions of a “special income tax” that you paid all these years, which is over and above the regular income tax illegally collected. Strangely there is not one definition in the entire Title 42 on this term “auxiliary beneficiary” that I can find using a word search and neither in the CFR sections for 42 USC. There is one other CFR that the term Auxiliary beneficiary appears and that is in Housing and Urban Development.

24 CFR 5.214 (4) Social Security Number (SSN) means the nine-digit number that is assigned to a person by the Social Security Administration and that identifies the record of the person’s earnings reported to the Social Security Administration. The term does not include a number with a letter as a suffix that is used to identify an auxiliary beneficiary.
SSA means the Social Security Administration.

Being the SS payments are really a gift from the true beneficiary, one would not expect to get any more than what Congress decides to appropriate each year on this Ponzi scheme. After all you are “of secondary importance” to the real beneficiary who has used your money taken to further the beneficiaries goals, hence you are referred as the “auxiliary beneficiary” in 26 CFR 7701 (11). Legally we cannot be called a beneficiary if none of the contracts exist; no insurance plan is in effect; there is no trust fund whatsoever as stated in the Supreme Court cases and the Congressional Hearings of 1953 and as just recently confirmed by Treasury Secretary O’Neill in the Freedom Foundation article

When is a Social Security Number not a Social Security Number

The Social Security Fraud
by Sheldon Richman, September 2001

Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill upset some people recently simply by telling the truth. He had the temerity to say that the Social Security Trust Fund has no tangible assets. It’s empty.

O’Neill is right. The Trust Fund is a figment of our collective imagination. There’s no “there” there. It doesn’t exist.

With that in mind and the fact it is a gift from Congress you can now see why the use of the term “Auxiliary beneficiary.” So when people on SS are asked for a SS # they legally can say they have none. I wonder what all these agencies would say when they get the answer like,

“I have no Social Security Number by law and look to 26 CFR 301.7701 (11). Now if you persist then I have the right to report you to the government for harassment and a violation of the law demanding something I do not have.”
So that is what the “A” stands for after the number, “Auxiliary.” So before the “A” or letter was added you could call it the Social Slave Number that the beneficiaries (Congress) uses the funds collected and then give you a “gift” for the use of it and can disband it anytime they want and you have no say whatsoever as an “Auxiliary Beneficiary who is of “secondary importance.”

* Note The above 26 CFR 7701 (11) was amended to read as it does now by the Federal Register
Vol. 39, No. 52 March 14, 1974. Also it states at 301.6109 (g) “Nonresident alien exclusion. This section shall not apply to nonresident aliens, foreign corporations, foreign partnerships, or foreign private foundations that do not have income effectively connected with a trade or business within the United States and do not have an office or place of business or fiscal or paying agent in the United States.”

This is but another proof that in my Book Which One Are You , published in 1990 I was right on point that we are nonresident aliens BY TERMS of legal art and therefore, are excluded from obtaining a SS # and becoming an income tax payer. When reading the Federal Register one can plainly see that the United States is not the 50 states in Union, therefore, all corporations created in the states are foreign to the United States and do not fall under the “domestic” corporation term of art that corporations believe to be them. And, people in these states who are NOT US citizens are therefore , BY TERMS OF ART, nonresident aliens never subject to income tax or wage tax UNLESS they are having a source of income effectively connected to the business or trade of the United States. Of course you have to realize that the United States is that area inhabited by criminals called Congress and as espoused by the US supreme court in the John Barron case 7 Peters 243, that the Constitution and the Bill of Rights were for the people of the United States and not for the people in the States in Union. Therefore, all United States laws pertain only to that area owned and controlled by Congress, AKA United States, and cannot pertain to the states or the people not US citizens within the several states.

Sincerely The Informer


The Fake News Exposed


Message To The Voting Cattle




Malthusain Depopulationist Evelyn Bernie De Sanders Rothschilds For U.S. Puppet



There is No Debt;






A Little Background History of Pedigree


It may do us good, to investigate a little more closely one of the participants, in league with the others, sponsoring the rewilding publication.

The participant in question is the, “Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts (UK)”, whose name is included, among others, at the bottom of the publications pages (acting as its back-cover), to which, together with the other participants, they so lavishly helped to facilitate its sponsorship, in drawing attention to the ambitions of Agenda 21’s Depopulating Programme of Rewilding Europe.

It is not here proposed that an in-depth analysis of this organizations philanthropic pursuits are examined, which unquestionably have done much good, but what is proposed, is to be made aware of the background connections behind these organizations, and their far reaching interests in influencing much of human progress, or as the individual is free to determine for themselves, their far reaching influence in deceivingly stifling human progress.

The case to be presented, is one of providing a sequence of openly available information in the form of website links, that admittedly show that ‘the owners’ behind various philanthropic organizations as ‘their founders’ to them, and not forgetting that that which is ‘founded’ by you is clearly owned by you, surely have strong ties to the contribution of Agenda 21’s ambitions of, ‘harmonising humanities numbers to the earth’s ability of providing sustenance for sustainability to be viable’.

“The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT…was previously known by the names Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves and Royal Society for Nature Conservation.”

History –

“The forerunner of the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, was established by Charles Rothschild in 1912. It aimed initially to draw up a list of the country’s best wildlife sites with a view to purchase for protection as nature reserves, and by 1915 it had drawn up a list of 284, known as Rothschild Reserves.”


Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts


Nathaniel Charles Rothschild (9 May 1877 – 12 October 1923), known as “Charles”, was an English banker and entomologist and a member of the Rothschild family.

Family –

Charles Rothschild worked as a partner in the family bank NM Rothschild and Sons in London.

Nature conservation –

He was concerned about the loss of wildlife habitats, and in 1912 set up the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, the forerunner of The Wildlife Trusts partnership. In 1915 the Society produced a schedule of the best wildlife sites in the country, some of which were purchased as nature reserves.

Marriage –

In 1907 Charles Rothschild married Rozsika Edle von Wertheimstein (1870 – 30 June 1940), a Hungarian baroness and descendent of…one of the wealthiest families in Europe and had made their fortune over a century before the Rothschilds.


Charles Rothschild


The Rothschild Reserves –

In 1912 Charles Rothschild founded the ‘Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves’ (SPNR).

More on the Rothschild Reserves –

“What was new about this approach to preserving ‘wild life’ was that it focussed on the habitatrather than just the individual species within it. It highlighted a growing belief that places needed protection from development and other damage. It showed a desire for an ordered and reasoned approach to acquiring nature reserves, in the face of increasign pressure on the natural world and culminated in a ‘shopping list’ of ideal sites – the Rothschild Reserves.”

“…the SPNR always established who the landowner was. The intention at this time was to purchase the land, turn it into a nature reserve and then hand it over to the National Trust to manage under special conditions.”

“It was believed that it was better to fence off nature and leave it to its own devices, rather than practically manage it…”

“The elite conservation crusaders could be seen to have inhabited a moral high ground where, from a lofty height, they shook their fists at progress in their quest for ‘primeval country’ and their desire to shut it off.”


The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves


Climate Change & Wildlife –

Climate change is a significant threat to the UK’s wildlife. The Wildlife Trusts believe thatnature should be central to both climate change adaptation (e.g. through the use of natural processes to reduce flood risk) and mitigation (e.g. through the protection and restoration of peat and peatlands to store and sequester carbon).”

“However there is now widespread agreement among scientists that we are living in an era of accelerated climate change, much of which can be attributed to increased human activity (for example through increased carbon emmissions from air pollution).”


The words in the phrase, ‘widespread agreement among scientists’, are words that can only be attributed to ‘conflict-of-interest’ based political consesus science, and NOT ‘factual science’.

Climate change means that there are complex demands being placed on land for food, wildlife, recreation and development. Wildlife has adapted to climate change in the past but our modern landscapes – full of buildings, transport links and intensively managed farmland and fragmented natural habitats – present a new challenge to species. It is vital that we manage and use land sustainably, so it allows plants and animals to move and adapt to new conditions for survival as the climate changes. The Wildlife Trusts’ vision for A Living Landscape is working to bring about landscape scale restoration of the natural environment and adaptation to climate change, realising and using the multiple benefits provided by nature.”

“Protecting and restoring our natural environment and ecosystems is important in its own right…Flood prevention, crop pollination, carbon absorption, clean and healthy water sources – these benefits of our natural environment must all be considered and maximised as we prepare for the effects of climate change. Critically, we need to restore healthy, Living Landscapes that help to alleviate floods, control pollution and help us cope with extremes of temperature.”

“Many of The Wildlife Trusts’ Living Landscape schemes have been designed with climate change adaptation at the forefront. At the heart of Living Landscape approach is habitat restoration and connectivity.”


Climate Change & Wildlife

The Wildlife Trusts


Giammaria Ortes:
The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”

Recruiting the military for Agenda 21’s depopulation genocidal murder

Sustainbilities justification for depopulation, is that there are too many people to harmonise with the earth’s environment, and therefore depopulation is an absolute necessity. Of course, with the fraudulent excuse of false ‘climate change’ science as the driving force behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s ambitions for mass genocidal murder, it comes as no surprise that the Self-Ennobling Ones law enforcement and in particular their military are now positioning and prioritising their role towards sustainablities climate change depopulation ‘development’ agenda, to have the military engage in excused mass murder, on behalf of the Self-Ennobling Ones, covertly presented under a ‘new energy security strategy’ –



GB 2293 SPNC
Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts
This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National
Register of Archives digitisation project
The National Archive
National Registar of Archives – NRA 24457

Centre for Urban and Regional Studies University of Birmingham and Institute of Agricultural History
University of Reading
A list of the historical records of the Society for the Promotion of Nature Conservation
Compiled by Philippa Bassett as part of a research project funded by the Social Science Research Council
August 1980


World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)

World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Founders –

Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organizationfounded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is theworld’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

The group’s mission is “to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.”[7] Currently, much of its work focuses on the conservation of three biomes that contain most of the world’s biodiversity: oceans and coasts, forests, and freshwater ecosystems. Among other issues, it is also concerned withendangered species, pollution and climate change.”


It is recommended that the entire page is read to acquire a brief working understanding and background to the WWF


World Wide Fund for Nature


There is nothing cuddly about the WWF


Use of the Glass Prism of Doublespeak to De-mystify Meaning

It becomes clear what the Self-Ennobling Ones agenda really is, for which they have worked diligently towards over a great deal of time, and how in the use of understanding “doublespeak”, they convey that agenda to each other worldwide, as well as to their mis-guided minions.

With a serious appreciation of “doublespeak”, we can come to see it in use for ourselves with negative events around the world demonstrably at odds with official explanations for them, given as one of a ‘rosy outlook’ for the future, when quite obviously the real situation on the ground points to ‘a planned grim outlook’ for the future.

The information to follow then must be interpreted through the light prism of “doublespeak”, through which wording is shone to separate its material for the purpose of seeing true meaning conveyed. That is to say, the opposite of what is presented.

This will no doubt mean, perhaps that given all the accompanying evidence, what is seen before us is not ‘crisis management’ to avert disaster and to ensure continuity for a ‘rosy outlook’ into the future, but through the prisim of doublespeak, what is seen before us are the Self-Ennobling Ones as gods at play, with their preplanned “games” devised for ‘managed controlled rehearsals’ to ensure discontinuity and great suffering through their devices and mechanisms of control.


Defininition of Doublespeak

– language that can be understood in more than one way and that is used to trick or deceive people

– language used to deceive usually through concealment or misrepresentation of truth


Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary

Definition of Doublespeak

Doublespeak is language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of wordsIt may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning (for example, naming a state of war “peace”).



From the description given of “doublespeak”, the agenda behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy becomes clear –

‘Sustainablility and its development’, is a cruel deception in which a vast majority of people in the world, as victims of its ‘doublespeak hidden agenda’, work towards their own elimination, with the enslavement of the surviving few, housed in concentration camp ‘smart growth’ community dwellings, serving the rest of their miserable lives as serfs to the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy.

The prevailing mental condition then is controlled insanity –

Doublespeak is saying one thing and meaning another, usually its opposite.

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.

Reader – doublethink

Doublespeak publications –

United Nations Publications
PDF Publications

Control of Raw Materials –

The Hunger Games (2012)


What is of particular interest in the movie, The Hungar Games, is the backdrop through which the movie and the characters are framed. This backdrop of infrastructure is a future sustaiable development environment.


The Real Hungar Games (Sustainable Development post 2015) –

Ensuring Discontinuity through Management Game Play –

Food Chain Reaction: A Global Food Security Game
1250 24th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037 | © 2015 World Wildlife Fund, Inc.


We read –

About the Organizers

Food Chain Reaction is being produced by World Wildlife Fund and the Center for American Progress, with game design from CNA. Funding and technical support for Food Chain Reaction has been provided by Cargill with major support from Mars, Inc. Additional funding has been provided by Sealed Air Corporation.


Food Chain Reaction – A Global Food Security Game


Organisational Structural Chart for the Control of Raw Material


The Windsors’ Global Food Cartel: Instrument for Starvation

Primary Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage

Alternative Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage

Hinting towards an arm of sustainable developments preplanned depopulation agenda –

How would your nearest city be affected by a bomb the size of that dropped on Hiroshima?



To understand the necessity for war, using manufactured antagonism between countries as a veil to set about eliminating the true enemy (people), particularly timed for the need to distract from discovering the bankers lie of economy, and providing for the bonus of killing two birds with one stone, when it comes to meeting the requirements of obedience and Agenda 21’s depopulation goals.



The prelude to war can be traced as far back as 2008, when we look at the information under the subtitle heading,


to be found part way down the document –



Archive for Club of Rome


The 1001: A Nature Trust

The 1001 Club

The 1001 Club
Bankers, Intelligence Agents, and Raw Materials Executives Striving for a Sustainable Future


* pre-December 2014 archived version of the site – Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics

Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics


1001 Club – Incomplete Membership List

The ‘1001 Club’ – a nature trust


Transnational Classes and International Relations
By Kees Van der Pijl


For Educational Purposes Only –

Dr. Claude Martin, Switzerland – Board Member, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Former Director General of WWF


We read –

The department was separated from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1997

* Department for International Development (DFID)


We read –

The Duke of Edinburgh is the patron of many organisations, including WWF and the Duke of Edinburgh Award. The Duke was the first President of WWF-UK from its foundation in 1961 to 1982, and President of WWF-International from 1981 to 1996. He is now President Emeritus for WWF.


We read –

Their Patron is HRH The Prince of Wales.

The Wildlife Trusts


Our mission

To protect and sustainably manage natural ecosystems of the world; to conserve their biodiversity, with emphasis on threatened habitats and endangered species

How We Work –


World Conservation and Wildlife Trust


United States Agency for International Development (USAID)

International Development United States Agency For
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20004

A privately held company in Washington, DC

International Development United States Agency For
Usaid M/Oaa/Cas
1300 Penn Avenue Nw Room 824-C
Washington, DC 20004 – View Map
Phone: (212) 713-4320
Own This Business?

A privately held company in Washington, DC

USAID Acronym List


“Bernhard helped found the World Wildlife Fund (later renamed World Wide Fund for Nature), becoming its first President in 1961, and in 1970 establishing the WWF’s financial endowment “The 1001: A Nature Trust”. In 1954, he was a co-founder of the international Bilderberg Group, which has met annually since then to discuss corporate globalization…”

The Prince eventually went to work for the German chemical giant IG Farben, then the world’s fourth-largest company (which survives today as BASF, AGFA, and Bayer). After training, Bernhard became secretary to the board of directors at the Paris office in 1935.

“Prince Bernhard was a member of the “Reiter-SS”, a mounted unit of the SS and joined the Nazi party.[7] He later also joined the National Socialist Motor Corps.”

“With his global contacts, Bernhard in May 1954, was a key figure in organising a meeting at the Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands for the business elite and intellectuals of the Western World to discuss the economic problems in the face of what they characterized as the growing threat from Communism. This first meeting was successful, and it became an annual gathering known as the Bilderberg Group. The idea for the European Union, first proposed by Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950, was encouraged at Bilderberg.”


It is recommended that the entire page is read


Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld


Anton Rupert


Sir Julian Huxley is brother to Aldous Huxley

Huxley, Arnold Family Tree

“Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS[1] (22 June 1887 – 14 February 1975) was a British evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and internationalist.”

“He was secretary of the Zoological Society of London (1935–1942), the first Director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association.”

“In 1959 he received a Special Award of the Lasker Foundation in the category Planned Parenthood – World Population. Huxley was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society and its president from 1959–1962.”

Later career –

“Huxley, a lifelong internationalist with a concern for education, got involved in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and became the organization’s first director-general in 1946.”

“In a fortnight he dashed off a 60-page booklet on the purpose and philosophy of UNESCO, eventually printed and issued as an official document. There were, however, many conservative opponents of his scientific humanism. His idea of restraining population growth with birth control …”

“Huxley’s internationalist and conservation interests also led him, with Victor Stolan, Sir Peter Scott, Max Nicholson and Guy Mountfort, to set up the WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature under its former name of the World Wildlife Fund).”


Recommended that the entire page is read


Julian Huxley


UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy – The Task of Unifying the World Mind

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 1

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 2

Global Depopulation and the Eugenics Agenda (Full)



The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (French: Organisation des Nations unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture; UNESCO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN). Its purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through education, science, and culture in order to further universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and human rights along with fundamental freedom proclaimed in the United Nations Charter.[1] It is the heir of the League of Nations’International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.




UNESCO – It’s Evil Purpose and Philosophy


“He was then married to Margaret “Margo” Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty three years.”

Godfrey A. Rockefeller


Margaret Kuhn Rockefeller daughter of Richard Parker Kuhn


Caroline Parker Kuhn
b. 26 January 1925, d. 30 April 2011

Richard P. Kuhn 1916
1916 Class Crest
Cullum No. 5528 • Jun 28, 1963 • Died in Bedford Hills, New York
Interred in St. Matthews Churchyard, Bedford Hills, NY

Kuhn, Loeb & Co.

In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.


Who Is Running America ?


For Educational Purposes Only –

We note UNESCO’s founding influence in the settlement of the Self-Ennobling Ones intellectual copyright institutional agrrangements in securing inheritance rights, between themselves as gods, towards their successor-assigns as beneficiaries, when we read –

1. Introduction, page 533

“This essay returns to such an “old” conflict in the development of international copyright dating back to the signing of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works on 9 September 1886. Translation, a constant “ pierre d’achoppement” in the evolutionary history of the Berne Convention, caused problems from the outset. These returned with full force at the fourth conference for the revision of the Berne Convention in Stockholm on 11-14 June 1967. Described by one participant as “the worst experience in the history of international copyright conventions”, Stockholm marked the culmination of several years’ discussion on the viability of the international copyright regime to accommodate the needs of developing nations.”

2. Brussels, June 1948, page 534

“The Bureaux Internationaux Réunis pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (BIRPI), located in Berne, was the administrative seat from the inception of the treaty, and oversaw revision conferences in Berlin (1908), Rome(1928) and then Brussels (1948).”

subtitle, 2. Brussels, June 1948, page 535

“The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),played an important role in trying to redress a situation in which, in copyright terms, the world emerged from the war “virtually split into two entirely separate and independent parts”. Launched in 1945 as successor to the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC), UNESCO anchored its copyright policy in the 1948 Declaration on Human Rights.”

TIND Comment.-

UNESCO’s strategic deceptive foil of cover as camouflage, in the use of its development of “collectivist” terms for a “Declaration on Human Rights”, won them the approval of their competing proposals for the Self-Ennobling Ones to accept, as the best means of providing for an excuse to convince the victims of designed eugenicist wars, to relegate their ‘freedoms of independence’ to closer cooperation, or corporation, by compelling acquiescence of the general populace to such terms, out of “fear” of a repeat performance of world war, in it being said, that closer cooperation would quell the brutal urges of man.

They, the general populace at large, having no inkling whatsoever, that their compulsion to accept these copywritten terms had been by design, would also have no inkling, that UNESCO’s proposals had the further advantage of completely blinding them into not coming to an understanding that what was copywritten by them in turn, through the Self-Ennobling One’s instruments of deception, (without qualification under registration of ‘noncommital-to-contract’ to copywritten-countries, but merely to record), would effectively provide the means for the Self-Ennobling Ones agencies to ‘collectively’ interfere in the ownership of their intellectual property.

Interfere as superior authorities to a now admitted subordinate position of a registrant, and that through copyright registration ‘without qualificaiton’, it was an admission that registrants were mentally incapable of maintaining their own affairs, in the same way a child lacked the mental capacity to provide for themselves, by demonstrably not understanding the requirements of speaking-up in their own self-interests, as an adult would understand to do, given their circumstances in the world as being functionally independent, and with the recognition that that independence brings, of having the cognition to voice that independence in line with their self-interests and circumstances.

Failure to speak-up, would no doubt reflect on their mental capacities as being immature and in need of assistance by rightly remaining in the charge of an adult parental figure providing for stewardship, to guide and decide what would be in their best interests. Such arrangements, of course, could find their victims intellectual rights the subject of ‘profitable confiscation’ by any number of ‘seemingly’ legitimate means.

The reader to the preceding may remain unperturbed, since as it ought to be well known, any formal relationships entered into, calls for honesty in the interests of fairness for obvious, fair and full disclosure to be provided – for the very reason that genuine ‘fairness’ can only be the basis of authenticity and therefore legitamcy – otherwise, whatsoever arrangements were entered into without full disclosure made known as to the true nature of the operations of the parties to a relationship, would justly render those arrangements ‘null and void’. And that being the case, without having even to speak of ‘the requirements of justice’.

Continuing, page 535

“Prior to the Brussels conference, UNESCO had already noted how copyright was a “barrier” to the “free flow of culture among all the peoples of the world”. In the next few years, UNESCO instigated a number of copyright initiatives culminating in 1952 with The Universal Copyright Convention(UCC).

In sum, the UCC offered an international multilateral convention with lower levels of protection than Berne, thus providing a vehicle for the US to come into the fold of multilateral international copyright agreements. Several specificities in national legislation kept the US outside Berne until 1989; these were primarily the compulsory registration of copyright and the controversial manufacturing requirement, which afforded English-language books copyright protection in the US only if manufacturedon American soil. As a compromise between the formal registration required by US law and the no formalities-Berne framework, the UCC introduced the use of a ©symbol, making it possible for the US and other countries to sign the UCC without having to change their national legislation.”


Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén

United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property

World Intellectual Property Organisation

Multilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world:
The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)


We read –

“It is the heir of the League of Nations’ International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.”



Of course, the League of Nations was the first fictitious global corporate institution, ready in waiting, to ‘tranisition’ the people of the world into ‘the idea of global governance’ after the scare tactics of fear in World War One (WWI), soon to be replaced with its permanent successor, after the follow up of WWII to ‘secure’ the establishment of the strategy of fear in bringing about an immovable seat for the readiness of permanent global governance in the form of the United Nations –

League of Nations`


In developments further unifying and solidifying the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious interests in stealthly centralizing the means with which to confiscate the physical realm, we read, they have superseded and made obsolete the Universal Copyright Convention for that of the World Trade Organisation’s ‘Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS)’ –

“Since almost all countries are either members or aspiring members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and are thus conforming to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), the UCC has lost significance.”


Universal Copyright Convention

Again, we note the understandings reached concerning issues of creative intellectual property rights, when we learn of those acting on behalf of the authors to creative property, organizing their interests through their forums to settle on agreement, when we read, 1. Introduction, page 1, of, ‘Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights in the 1930s’ –

After a series of bilateral agreements the main European book trading countries enacted in cooperation with culturally aware publishers and authors a multilateral agreement, the Berne Convention, in 1886. Although the American states passed the first Inter-American copyright agreement at the same time, the Convention of Montevideo in 1889, it was the Berne Convention, which proofed to be a reliable political instrument in the course of the twentieth century pointing the way ahead when intellectual property rights were institutionalized on a global scale first with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1967 followed by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1994.


Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property
Rights in the 1930s
Isabella Löhr, University of Leipzig


But wait, returning to the excellent writings from COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS, those who don’t understand the dangers fictions can pose, are to be further deluded into thinking that they matter, with this –

7. Epilogue: Geneva, October 2007, page 549

“In October 2007, the WIPO Development Agenda was established by the WIPO General Assembly. Scholars have hailed it as a possible new departure for the international intellectual property regime, which has been completely dominated since 1994 by the trade-based rationales of WTO and the infamous Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). TRIPS has eclipsed and helped render the UCC “wholly peripheral to the current international copyright framework” and is targeted for critique by developing nations, echoing concerns already articulated already in 1967. The Stockholm Protocol, a satellite “disconnected from its orbit”, is another instrument relegated to the cemetery where intellectual property texts go to die. Yet, each of these texts is part of the historical foundation from which the Development Agenda draws inspiration.

Although it remains to be seen what clout the Development Agenda will have to redress past wrongs and more recent sins in the power relations between developed and developing nations, it proposes substantial changes in both its general direction and WIPO governance. In 1884, 1885, and 1886 only a handful of nations were present to formulate the original Berne Convention, and they represented a diplomatic elite. Fifty-seven states and more than 400 inter-governmental and non-governmental organisations were present in Stockholm. At present, WIPO counts 184 member nations and over 250 NGOs among those who participate in Geneva deliberations. NGOs now out weigh states in total number, greatly accelerating the presence of civil society in these global arenas, suggesting, to Ruth Okediji, that states are not as important in setting the agenda as they used to be.”


Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén



Environmentalism’s Dominionist Agenda Exposed

Highly Accurate Opinion Piece, All the world is a stage, all of the politicos are actors participating in crisis acting social engineering; What they have done, the deception they have maintained is beyond imaginable and is so horrific it is even unbelievable for me when I know without a doubt it is all true. Everything outside of the legal structure of their family owned business where they have made everything and everyone not of their family property. Resources, human and otherwise disposable property.

By There is No Debt-Six Honest Men


“Sustainabilities murderous depopulating ambitions…has always continually conformed to a uniform and miraculously exact lockstep approach in contriving to combine pretended solution for the world’s economic problems created by the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s bankers lie of economy, with that of environmental concerns in the guise of sustainable developments murderous depopulating, impoverishing and enslaving new environmental economy “–
“When we understand the necessity to prevent discovery of the Self-Ennobling Ones confiscatorybankers lie of economy and the single solution to it through Mathematically Perfected Economy, and ‘where’ their lie operates, and that ownership of all countries as wealth fleecing business corporations belong to the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy, we can see why it is that despite the differing working approaches to preserving the environment that people develop, approaches that work for the betterment of the environment and themselves,sustainabilities murderous depopulating ambitions has prevented them, and has always continually conformed to a uniform and miraculously exact lockstep approach in‘contriving’ to combine pretended solution for the world’s economic problems created by the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s bankers lie of economy, with that of environmental concerns in the guise of sustainable developments murderous depopulating, impoverishing and enslaving new environmental economy, that agree in‘exactly’ the same way for their solution across the world in reflecting a single mind-set even across population groups of people at different locations in the world, with different outlooks and conflicting interests, and furthermore, even more so strangely, with so-called political representatives of different countries at loggerheads with each other and on the verge of war,agreeing with sustainabilities murderous depopulating, impoverishing, and enslaving new economic enivronmental programme for all the people of the world.

How can this be so, unless of course all countries are compelled to respect a higher authorities wishes as property to those wishes. And that clearly means the ‘staged theatre’ of countries being somehow independent from each other and reflecting their governments governing by the consent of the people is exposed as but a sham.

We can then see and understand that the military and other public servants of all countries will be used to implement sustainabilities murderous programme when we take a cursory glance at key documents, and recognize the fabrication of events to allegedly defend people from the Self Ennobling Ones own sponsored terrorists with a loss of freedoms, as well as their parallel fabrication of events leading towards chaos and war, that simply further targets people as the enemy on behalf of the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s fear of theirconfiscatory bankers lie of economy being discovered; with all this done in order to clear the way for depopulating the planet that is in no way remotely overpopulated, perhaps then we can wake-up and alert each other in our own defense against the machinations of controlled insanity.

We must be mindful of ample evidence that has clearly shown, and continuous to do so, ‘key crucial events’ towards escalating significant phases in the implementation of sustainability, hidden from prying eyes with the use of double-speak and the distraction of fabricated disruptive events.

As the near-future ‘full implementation’ of sustainability and its call for destruction and depopulation approaches ever closer, huge clues are given to people facing imminent demise, when we ‘see’ some of those tasked with sustainabilities implementation distancing themselves when they finally come to realise what is required of them, that is to say, mass murder of people in general as the enemy.

Such events that warn people of near-future and imminent danger to their lives can be seen signaled in the media, with excuses to events given that somehow seem unconvincing or very odd indeed.

When the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy are made aware that significant events, or people, may derail their plans and make them obvious, any number of distractions are called for and put into operation by their employee corporate executive ‘acting politicians’ of their corporate countries, so that the Self-Ennobling Ones underlying hidden agenda is kept confused. This forms their modus operandi to confuse people and to continue concealing their plans from being understood by a broad enough populace that may unify in objecting and interferingdefensively to their plans.

Here then lies the necessity for the use of the strategy of ‘divide and conquer’, by setting a common populace at each others throats with theatrical fabrications as events that are designed to distract people away from the real underlying issues, using the able assistance of the Self-Ennobling Ones key political ‘actors’ as agents who understand that their roles scripted for them they previously played, may change when called to do so.

Perhaps it can now been seen why the owners of corporate countries, with the use of their distractive strategies of divide and conquer, can drive people at each others throats, or have them at the very least look in the wrong direction, by setting the stage for their key political actors to be scripted according to a different role as necessity requires. In this way the broader populace are discouraged from scrutinizing more closely an issue or issues exposing imminent danger to their well-being and lives, preventing them from waking up and unifying in defending themselves against a serious threat –”—Six Honest Men

To Summarise

What is being seen is a scheme of permanent confiscation decided on, long ago, with its ‘continuity’ of depopulation-planning, via:

– chemical warfare against people in the guise of:

vaccinations as poisonous contaminates precipatating desease,

the release of laboratory deseases requiring further vaccine contaminates,

corrupted medical institutions owned by the Self-Ennobling Ones chemical-pharmaceutical industries that provide unnecessarily dangerous cocktails of chemical-pharmaceuticals as medication, and

chemical and genetic attacks on dietary needs and the consumption of provisions, that together, all shorten longevity and precipitate further desease;

– pre-staged chaos to then excuse a loss of freedoms that sponsored terrorism had been tasked with; and

– the Self-Ennobling Ones political executives of all their corporate countries in agreement to coordinate the preplanning, re-hearsal and the build-up of military troops and exercises for precipatating world war, with the excuse provided to the wider world of, having to take the necessary defense measures against hostile provocations that have as their ulterior motives the acquisition of territorial control and resources by terroristic invasive means, which of course in reality forms the bases of excuses for further accelerated depopulation of people as targets in world war, all for the purposes of, working in parallel and concealing through Chaos,

the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s wealth confiscating bankers lie of economy that has automatically and irreversibly terminated the world’s economy in its deliberate designs as a confiscatory mechanism, to be this time replaced, finally, with a long ago preplanned scheme euphemistically termed, ‘sustainable development’, with its land-grabbing feudal ‘rewilding’ new environmental green economy put in the place of the bankers lie of economy, and justified on the bases of a pseudo-scientific climate change ‘fraud’ that deprives people of not only the use of carbon-based energy for their needs and growth, which of course, has been excused through a ‘conjured’ climate change ‘lie’ that determines carbon dioxide is now a pollutant, when in fact it has always been known as, and is, and will always remain a nutrient for vegetation, and continuing from there, a scheme for the purpose of, having the temerity of considering indirect drivers (people) to be pollutants as the enemy of divine-man (being those to be found ‘in their God’s grace’), and the environment, because indirect drivers exhale carbon dioxide as a by-product of metabolism in the conversion of energytaken from food to keep them healthy.

What is being seen then, is a depopulating scheme that has now confidently phased itself into a global administrative supreme bureaucratic ‘will’, as a false rule of law, entitled to operate only across the fictitious jurisdictional territories of all private corporate fictitious countries and not the jurisdictional territory of the physical world, for the imminent and final stages of ‘action’ into itsOrder of feudal-technocratic enslaving governance of the entire world on behalf of its owners will, by confiscating the physical world having permanently usurped ‘freewill’ given to people as their Father’s Will. So it seems.

A usurping ‘will’ that replaces and banishes Our Father’s dominion over the physical world and His Will for that world given to mean ‘freewill’ without the payment of wealth as tribute, with that of the ‘will’ of the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy and having to pay as tribute the price of wealth confiscation through their bankers lie of economy that can only be met by their sustainable developments murderous depopulation and permanent micro-managed enslavement.



Biometrics & Why Adjustments Are Needed to Measure Facial Features


I’m Wondering Just How Messed Up This Place Really Is


These people serving the fallen angel, Satan are capable of anything. They’d do this. They’d all do it. They would deceive you with fake events, fake deaths and actors playing various roles in entertainment and politicos if they had the means, the material, the unlimited resources to do such things as this, I’m calling it domestic espionage crisis acting social engineering. They can fake history, fake actors personal history. The possibility is real.  If there is any truth to this then I’m glad they did not slaughter this guy as they lead us to believe they did. These people have no conscience no honor and are not man, men or women or woman nor anything decent or kind. They hate their brother. They are indeed sickos. Every possibility of deception by Satan and Satanists must NOT be under estimated. Wickedness such as this should not be under estimated nor should we forget that Wickedness has no LIMITATIONS.. Nothing is beneath wicked people such as these.



Is Bernie Sanders a European Double Agent?

Who the heck is this old man? Do you know him? Is he Bernie? Is he somebody else? Who else might he be? Can you tell the two apart? They’re conning you again, and again, and again.. You know why? Because they don’t respect you.

  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail
  • Thumbnail



There Will Be No Mercy From His Global Police State