August 5, 2020

Supreme Court: Bill of Rights Is For Corporations

And Not You The Citizens

Share

The Hilariousness of Anti Grazing Public Lands Advocates Crying over AUMS fees

And labeling the American rancher welfare queens..

 

The Real Size of the Bailout

“The price tag for the Wall Street bailout is often put at $700 billion—the size of the Troubled Assets Relief Program. But TARP is just the tip of the iceberg of money paid out or set aside by the Treasury Department and Federal Reserve. In her book, It Takes a Pillage: Behind the Bailouts, Bonuses, and Backroom Deals from Washington to Wall Street, Nomi Prins uncovers the hush-hush programs and crunches the hidden numbers to calculate the shocking actual size of the bailout: $14.4 trillion and counting.”

The bankers bailouts blow the ranchers subsidies out the window…

OK anti grazers; shut up!

Share

Naïveté is Not Innocence, It is Gross and Moribund Ignorance.

There apparently is no longer a man in this country who understands not only the meaning of actual freedom of will and conscience but also fails to comprehend the yearning for individual freedom of will and of conscience for any man with the high intelligence to understand extrication from this system of slavery is the only way. A man who grasps the true nature of freedom of will and conscience and justness not found in a system of granted privileges that amounts to permissible liberty under the systems definitions of pseudo justness known as Justice if those seeking it can afford it as only the super wealthy can acquire it..

Only stupid people haven’t realized that the world is run by self serving conniving sons-of-bitches. I say stupid people, not “ignorant”, because the ignorant can learn when they are presented information. One is a stupid person if they are offered the information, and they compulsively hand wave it off, claim disinterest as a cop out and go off and hide in the false comfort of a group that practices suppression and censorship and of self censor by ignoring the reality and clinging to falsehoods.. Why? Because they are lazy suckers, too stupid to realize they have been conned – over and over again, by the same psychopaths that have run the world for centuries. Tyrants get away with it because they can always count on the lowest common denominator for support..

The War Powers is the emergency Powers in the Constitution where it says that they have the power to pass all laws necessary and proper. The War Powers actually extends that to all agencies and agents under federal control.. Which means they can actually make law on the streets, in their offices, on the fly. The Necessary and Proper Clause doesn’t just extend to the Congress it extends to all governmental agencies and agents.. Saying they did anything illegal, was a crime is silly.. Because they never get arrested then charged then tried then jailed…Outside of their occasional mock trials with their disguised professional actors..

The Supremacy Clause bares this truth out as well.. As does the Necessary and Proper Clause.. They can say anything they want and take it back anytime they want whenever and however they want, even in secret.. Oh yes they have a Secrecy Clause as well..18 U.S. Code § 798 – Disclosure of classified information. That’s just for starters. And they make the determination of what data is kept secret from everyone except themselves all the time.. They can set up any type of sting operation they want as well.. Such as their states rights based on the states Tenth Amendment Sovereignty issue taken up by ignorant citizens playing the Sovereign man citizen card that is a legal impossibility explained in numerous law books used in the establishment of a politically chartered privately owned Nation/State Empire such the United States.. The COTUS provides a secrecy clause as well..

According to Madison’s Notes, the exact language of the secrecy rule was: “That nothing spoken in the house be printed, or otherwise published or communicated without leave.” The delegates adopted these rules without debate. And for the most part they adhered to the rule of secrecy.

Major Themes at the Constitutional Convention: 1. The Rule of Secrecy

teachingamericanhistory.org/static/convention/themes/1.html

The Supremacy Clause

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supremacy_Clause

The reality of citizen serf subject slave in this system of this world has been deconstructed by those of us who truly objected to it..

Deconstruction
noun
a method of critical analysis of philosophical and literary language that emphasizes the internal workings of language and conceptual systems, the relational quality of meaning, and the assumptions implicit in forms of expression.
. . .
Full Definition of deconstruction
1
: a philosophical or critical method which asserts that meanings, metaphysical constructs, and hierarchical oppositions (as between key terms in a philosophical or literary work) are always rendered unstable by their dependence on ultimately arbitrary signifiers; also : an instance of the use of this method
2
: the analytic examination of something (as a theory) often in order to reveal its inadequacy
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/deconstruction
. . .
deconstruction
noun
Synonyms and Antonyms of deconstruction
the separation and identification of the parts of a whole
Synonyms anatomizing, anatomy, assay, breakdown, analysis, dissection
Related Words assessment, diagnosis, evaluation, examination, inspection, investigation, muster, scrutiny; arrangement, assortment, cataloging (or cataloguing), categorization, classification, codification, indexing; enumeration, inventory, itemization, tabulation; division, reduction, segmentation, separation, subdivision
Near Antonyms agglomeration, aggregation, amalgamation, assimilation, coalescence, conglomeration, consolidation, integration, synthesis, unification
http://www.merriam-webster.com/thesaurus/deconstruction
. . .
Deconstruction
Criticism
Deconstruction, form of philosophical and literary analysis, derived mainly from work begun in the 1960s by the French philosopher Jacques Derrida, that questions the fundamental conceptual distinctions, or “oppositions,” in Western philosophy through a close examination of the language and logic of philosophical and literary texts. In the 1970s the term was applied to work by Derrida, Paul de Man, J. Hillis Miller, and Barbara Johnson, among other scholars. In the 1980s it designated more loosely a range of radical theoretical enterprises in diverse areas of the humanities and social sciences, including—in addition to philosophy and literature—law, psychoanalysis, architecture, anthropology, theology, feminism, gay and lesbian studies, political theory, historiography, and film theory. In polemical discussions about intellectual trends of the late 20th-century, deconstruction was sometimes used pejoratively to suggest nihilism and frivolous skepticism. In popular usage the term has come to mean a critical dismantling of tradition and traditional modes of thought.

Deconstruction in philosophy
The oppositions challenged by deconstruction, which have been inherent in Western philosophy since the time of the ancient Greeks, are characteristically “binary” and “hierarchical,” involving a pair of terms in which one member of the pair is assumed to be primary or fundamental, the other secondary or derivative. Examples include nature and culture, speech and writing, mind and body, presence and absence, inside and outside, literal and metaphorical, intelligible and sensible, and form and meaning, among many others. To “deconstruct” an opposition is to explore the tensions and contradictions between the hierarchical ordering assumed (and sometimes explicitly asserted) in the text and other aspects of the text’s meaning, especially those that are indirect or implicit or that rely on figurative or performative uses of language. Through this analysis, the opposition is shown to be a product, or “construction,” of the text rather than something given independently of it.
http://www.britannica.com/topic/deconstruction

Style and Form are everything; Substance and Meaning arise in their wake.

Perhaps we’ve learned something this morning concerning the conspiratorial aspect of American History.. One can hope..

For those of you struggling to salvage your servitude in slavery to those psychophants well have a nice day…

Share

All of Us In Their Slave Collar

Most people don’t see it or feel it but it’s there.. I’ve felt it most of my life and tried to tear it off my own neck..It’s fact.. Denial of this and of them and who they are is silly.. They use many ways to claim you as their property.. This is one of them.. They have us all at each others throats while they sit their and grin while inventing more cleverness to persecute us with for their profit and amusement.. I’m a hunter and I know when I’m being stalked and hunted.. See the chains connected to the collar? get a clue people… They’re treating us like we’re monsters, beasts, animals, no better than a wolf or a bear… On their Plantation Animal Farm…

 

 

Share

My Wolfed Down And Burned Down Wilderness Experience

I noticed something yesterday as I did a 14 mile hike on single track, off trail, then back to single track in the Frank Church Wilderness.. I’ve wandered around in this particular spot since the 1970s.. This section is along elk creek going towards Porter creek and beyond to Sulpher creek.. The place has mile wide and miles long seemingly endless meadows surrounded by once pristine lush forests and under story now all burned to the ground and is a maze of dead fall.. The single track paths are clogged shut for miles now..

The place used to be an incredibly amazing wildlife observation hike and even a early fall excellent hunting experience.. Along with incredible fishing in lakes and streams.. I was attempting a 16 mile in and out into one of those lakes and within about a mile I decided to give up on the lake.. I was tired of the down timber maze after fighting four miles of that maze of waist and chest high obstructions.. I knew I needed to turn back.. I made a loop out of the hike..

I noticed not one single bear scat, wolf scat, Wolverines were not in there usual hang outs making tracks and scat either, No elk scat, with two coyote scats and one deer scat on this walk.. A place where it was normal to see herds of elk, various deer sightings, bears, fish in the streams.. Even the bird and squirrel life in there was boring.. I did see a dead bull elk.. While bushwhacking four miles I nearly tripped over a bloated, by my estimation dead for 24-36 hours bull elk.. Nothing had fed on it, I could not determine a cause.. I suspect arrow though and to far back from the lungs and heart into the liver area..I did not have time to put a knife to work to validate my suspicion..

Kinda strange I thought, after reading about the grizzly man fight over a dead elk in Wyoming upon first stumbling onto this prize dead elk in this ruined dead place in these deep dead sterile woods.. I immediately started looking for a charging black bear.. What are the odds of in all of that devastated by wolves and fires area do I stumble over this dead bull.. As i walked around in this once paradise I thought of Val Geist’s predictions of the aftermath of over populated wolves.. I thought to my self, the damned wolves came in here and eventually delisted themselves..

They had to leave here or die, and they did.. They cleaned the place out.. In 2006 through 2009 on various excursions into this area I observed them doing exactly that.. Running the trails like police dogs, inspecting every camp, devouring everything not fast enough to out run them.. I did bump into a pair of wildlife photographer about a mile in from the trailhead.. Out of Oregon.. He asked me what happened to this place.. I say’s to him, wolves and fires, and fires and wolves.. So I noticed something yesterday, wolves eventually delist themselves.. The place was sterile, wolfed down and burned down… I’m going back in there to salvage the horns and ivories in late spring..

And to cut the trail open for my horses so I can once again fish the best fishing hole I’ve ever known.. It’s ironic what Wilderness was and became here in this place and how we as people have varying definitions of what it is, was, could have been, should be and currently is.. I prefer a wilderness of abundant green forests with teeming wildlife myself.. While others are determined that a Predator pit and burned out wilderness is preferable.. Real Wilderness then by the UNEP and UNEP clones definition is a dead place, a place of ruin.. That then was my wolfed down and burned down wilderness experience yesterday September 20th 2018.. I will add that the photographers I passed admitted they did not like what they had come to see.. Shameful were their final words…

Share

Dead Sheep And Who Done It

“What animal kills this much prey at one time”

Man does… The shepherd could walk among those sheep and kill them all one by one… A picture such as these are only evidence of dead sheep.. And a French news outlet saying wolves.. No other solid data to confirm cause..

Above metaphor 1.

A picture of a dead sheep is not a dead sheep thus is not evidence of anything but a picture of dead sheep. It is a picture first and foremost. It has ‘aspects’ of a dead sheep, and is symbolic of the idea of “dead sheep” and yet, it is NOT a dead sheep.. Nor does it prove cause of death of the dead sheep… So anyone skeptical of the pictures is using their head and simply implying they need more data.. But data in language is also a problem because all human language is metaphor whether it is recorded or in written symbols, pictures of words and numbers…. Wolves might have done this to those sheep, and people might have done this to those sheep to give the impression that wolves did this to those sheep.. But if you want to be gullible about it go ahead… Now those folks in the Alps have been having wolf troubles for years.. So why no mounted camera’s showing sheep standing around being slaughtered by wolves, or a wolf… So if these pics are your evidence supporting your argument you’re failing miserably to prove anything… This is beyond miserably amateurish…

Metaphor 2.

“Sit down before fact as a little child, be prepared to give up every preconceived notion, follow humbly wherever and to whatever abysses nature leads, or you shall learn nothing.”~Thomas Henry Huxley

Metaphor 3.

“God people are uneducated” —CMB
Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Coming from her thats priceless….

So these pics are an argument? No they are nothing.. You brought the pics forth as your argument and you left out any other irrefutable data in support of your argument.. Thats on you not on those who need more evidence…

So the bottom line is SWW like the WLNs and other groups are relying upon appeals to emotions for their arguments…

Share

Lavoy Finicum In The Firm

Share

Today’s Open Thread Pic Meaning

Is obvious.. We have a choice to make and we’d best make it soon… The double “V” VV on the upside down citizen world slave in delusion, dead in the system.. Losing this fight for life.. Let’s have the rest of the story shall we… By the way the enemy is mocking you…The zombie is all of you lost in their zombie system..

 

Which side of you will win?

Share

Rob Skiba, The Genius of

Authored by Rob Skiba;

Contrary to the wildly active gossip mill, I do NOT believe one needs to believe the Earth is flat in order to be saved. That’s a stupid, strawman argument, perpetuated by ignorant people prone to accepting and spreading gossip. It’s like making the pre-Trib. Rapture doctrine a “salvation issue.” We can believe in LOTS of “non-essentials,” while still holding to the core essentials. Hence, we have tens of thousands of “denominations” all based on various NON-essential beliefs. For me, this is no different.

That said, I do agree that FE is an important (though NOT a CORE essential) topic. Why? Because a house crumbles if built upon a faulty foundation. If Genesis 1 is bogus, then with what sort of foundation are we left? And sorry, but there simply is NO WAY to get a spinning, heliocentric, globular Earth hurling through an ever expanding vacuum of space out of anything in Genesis 1 (nor anywhere else in Scripture).

But frankly, this is not the only difficulty people have with Genesis. In the Creation account, you have an entire universe created in six literal days – and it’s made primarily by WORDS. Then you have a man being formed from dirt. A woman coming from said man’s rib. You have magical trees and a talking snake who gets the first humans to fall into “sin” by eating some fruit, which will condemn all future generations… and all this just in the first 3 chapters! By any “scientific” worldview, this is all total nonsense. Yet, most of us claim it as self-evident fact and believe it.

Reading further, any reasonable scholar who looks at Genesis 6 (and the MASSIVE amount of historical supporting evidence) confesses to a belief in angels mating with women to produce giants. Then, there’s a world-wide Flood, which is survived by 8 people, who built an ark and put representatives of every animal in it for safety (along with all the plants needed for food). A few hundred years later, a dude builds a “high tower to reach into heaven” and YHWH puts a stop to it by confounding their languages. Not long thereafter, YHWH picks a dude to be His primary representative and tells him to cut off the tip of his penis in order to seal the deal. Yeah… like that’s not weird.

On the surface, let’s face it, the first 15 chapters of Genesis are patently absurd to the unbelieving, “scientific” world. And yet, it’s these same 15 chapters, which form the foundation for the WHOLE STORY that plays out through the end of the book of Revelation. It’s the Act 1 set up to the classic three Act story arc. And it is precisely for this reason that the enemy has done all he can to try and utterly destroy or marginalize what’s in those 15 chapters.

So, when we really get down to it, regardless of FE cosmology, if you really think about what we believe (and I didn’t even mention the talking donkey, floating axe, people chillin’ out in a fiery furnace or den of lions, a man walking on water, Who later willingly allows Himself to be murdered in the most painful way imaginable – in order to redeem the sin of eating a piece of fruit offered by a talking snake. This same Savior then raises from the dead and is later going to split the sky and come to us on a flying horse, followed by a massive floating city), at this point, it’s kind of hard for us to call anything “crazy” while still believing all of that other stuff. So, I’m of the “embrace the madness” mindset. When it comes to Scripture, it’s all or nothing for me.

But I might add, they (the secular “science” community) aren’t much better – what with their belief in beer bubble universes exploding from microscopic dots, creating man from goo to you by way of the zoo and a host of other related nonsense. They have just as many (if not more) waaaaay out there, crazy beliefs than we do. So, to be brutally honest, NO ONE has the intellectual high ground here. You simply have to pick which brand of “crazy” you think best.

As for me and my house, I’m going with Scripture. Let God be true and every man a liar. But in order to do so, I can’t wed Scripture to the nonsense of “science falsely so-called.” And that’s precisely what MOST Christians/Torah folks are doing when they embrace modern cosmology and try to defend it with Scripture. They are forcing star-shaped pegs into circular holes. It’s just not going to work. The two world-views are not even remotely compatible. And to try to force them into agreement is simply not good scholarship, nor is it being intellectually honest with the text, oneself, or the audience.

Share

Jeremiah 23:25-27

 1599 Geneva Bible (GNV)

25 I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesied lies in my Name, saying, I [a]have dreamed, I have dreamed.

26 How long? [b]Do the prophets delight to prophesy lies, even prophesying the deceit of their own heart?

27 Think they to cause [c]my people to forget my Name by their dreams, which they tell every man to his neighbor, as their forefathers have forgotten my Name for Baal?

Share