November 19, 2019

Current Wizard Of Oz – Yet There Have Been Many

A government given the responsibility to care for a peoples every vital need—MUST be given the power to carry such a task out, which means the power to rule your every vital action.
This is the very definition of TYRANNY.

Nothing LOVING about TYRANNY.. IT IS PURE HATRED.. PURE EVIL..

There have been many;

Wizards Of Oz

https://www.google.com/search?q=Pictures+of+Popes&tbm=isch&tbo=u&source=univ&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi9jNbBgfbZAhVH2WMKHQnsAqgQsAQIKA&biw=1590&bih=869#imgrc=_

Share

Behavioural Engineering – Social Engineering – For Belief Engineering

Consider the Literary ‘supremacy’ – Word term linguistics supremacy – The superior I.Q. of white/black/brown/yellow men, under the influence of demonic possession to that of the inferior I.Q of those men of all cultures races and creeds who are not under the influence of demonic possession… In our daily observations of so called base idiocy and misplaced understanding of the real function of the idea of Intelligence Quotients defined by those under such influences..{I’m willing to bet 98% of folks wandering around out yonder in their meat life rides cannot spot the possessed ones even when they are standing in the open shouting at them..}

If that is the case everything around us all, historical, scientific, philosophical, would be highly suspect.. Especially considering their possession of ancient documents hidden away in their secret vaults we have no access to.. So they can rewrite history, go back and replicate false narratives by creating and using false ancient documents.. Or art.. Or archeological discovery.. Or deep sea discovery..All sudden fascinating and amazing discoveries..

These scoundrels can make up anything and make it appear real.. They’re practitioners of believability.. “Oh mortal man what can you not be made to believe”… Better understand the anatomy of controlled opposition.. Controlled research arena opposition.. They would leave no loose ends.. Consider the etymology of the words believe and knowledge.. Then again, Oh mortal man what can you not be made to want to believe… Like one thousands cuts with the knife.. Like one thousand or one hundred thousand false narratives.. How does one overcome that? They own it all. Even weaponized truth and tell.. They will release truth and study that result..

What if an unseen entity had thousands of years to practice screwing with mortal mans five senses… Can you imagine what that scoundrel could do? Can you? Instead of a comedy of errors I’d call it their comedy of terrors.. I’m saying the enemy of man and Earth has the capability to create any document of literature or art or anything they want tomorrow and they can easily convince the world it is as old as they say it is.. And they’ve been doing that for a very long time now.. Intelligencia Distractions.. Homeland Defense Mechanism.. Claiming they own this earth and defending it from another that claims he created it.. A grand theft in action.. Grand theft Opera.. What a grand gift this is to be born in it..

Truth Fears No Investigation – People that block and censure to shape and control their narrative fear something…

TRUTH OF THE WORLD! YOU “NEVER” REALLY EVER KNOW THE SYSTEM… ONLY WHAT THE SYSTEM ALLOWS YOU TO PERCEIVE. AND THINK YOU KNOW..

Cointellpro is the very anatomy of controlled opposition-Essential Intelligence Operations of set up opposition or infiltrate opposition…
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert, and at times illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.

DEFINITION: A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries.

Are we all under surveillance…

Who owns every corporation on this earth? Why that’s easy, the greatest intelligencia agency in world history..

How to turn everything into a weapon…

Everything is a distraction…

 

Share

Most Published SCIENCE Research Findings Are False

Do enjoy the read;

“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False John P. A. Ioannidis Abstract Summary There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research. Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, with ensuing confusion and disappointment. Refutation and controversy is seen across the range of research designs, from clinical trials and traditional epidemiological studies to the most modern molecular research. There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false. Here I will examine the key factors that influence this problem and some corollaries thereof. Go to: Modeling the Framework for False Positive Findings Several methodologists have pointed out that the high rate of nonreplication (lack of confirmation) of research discoveries is a consequence of the convenient, yet ill-founded strategy of claiming conclusive research findings solely on the basis of a single study assessed by formal statistical significance, typically for a p-value less than 0.05. Research is not most appropriately represented and summarized by p-values, but, unfortunately, there is a widespread notion that medical research articles should be interpreted based only on p-values. Research findings are defined here as any relationship reaching formal statistical significance, e.g., effective interventions, informative predictors, risk factors, or associations. *Negative* research is also very useful. *Negative* is actually a misnomer, and the misinterpretation is widespread. However, here we will target relationships that investigators claim exist, rather than null findings. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false.”
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1182327/ 
Also see:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_Ioannidis 

Scientists do lie a lot…

When Politics and Money come through the door the TRUTH goes out the window..

Share

For Theodore Roosevelt Was A Jolly Good Fellow That Nobody Can Deny

Uh Oh… We gonna make some fanatics mad with this one… GRIN…

“Freemason Theodore “Rex” Roosevelt, 1858 – 1919 #245 26th President of the United States of America 9th Commander-in-Chief of the Pope’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment Corporate-Fascist American Empire, 1901 – 1909 A member of the Jesuits’ Roosevelt-Delano-Rockefeller Dynasty, “Teddy” Roosevelt was the Black Pope’s first real Emperor and Commander-in-Chief of the Papal Caesar’s “Holy Roman” Fourteenth Amendment American Empire, intended to restore the Temporal Power of the Pope worldwide and to enforce the absolutist policies of the Holy Alliance. A personal friend of New York Knight of Malta William R. Grace (after whose Order he named his Maltese Cross Cabin in North Dakota), Jesuit Thomas Sherman, James Cardinal Gibbons (Archbishop of Baltimore), and Cardinal Satolli (the Vatican’s secret diplomatic agent in the White House), the Jesuits used their Shriner Freemason to begin building their corporate-fascist-masonic Empire throughout the western hemisphere. Under this wicked apostate Protestant, having erected the statue of President Andrew Johnson’s occult

Masonic master and White House advisor, Albert Pike, in Washington, D.C., Rome’s huge corporate monopolies, managed by J. P. Morgan, another Shriner Freemason, and Nicholas F. Brady, a Knight of Malta, began to be built and to work in unison preparing the Order’s massive Military Industrial Complex for the Jesuit General’s Second Thirty Years’ War. The approaching First World War was the major purpose for the construction of the Panama Canal, now in the hands of the Order’s Communist Red Chinese. Meanwhile, Jesuit-controlled Protestant America would be deceived into abandoning President George Washington’s wise policy of isolation, and begin to enforce the enslaving, political Temporal Power of Satan’s Papacy upon every nation on earth pursuant to the Black Pope’s wicked and evil Council of Trent. Theodore Roosevelt, Our Twenty-Sixth President, Ann Graham Gaines, (Chanhassen, Minnesota: The Child’s World, 2002) p. 36.”—Eric Phelps.. A thorough, illustrated biography discussing the president’s childhood, his career, his family, and his term as President of the United States. Includes a time line and glossary.

Well then… A jolly good feller for sure… And now we know who placed Pike’s statue in D.C.s Judicious Judicial Square…

And last but not least;

Interesting because I’ve learned to anger everyone is the result of telling them the truth.

Free government, well it’s certainly been free to do whatever it wants while destroying the freedom of being its citizens…

Share

The Language Of The Demonized – Scripted Numerological Political Propaganda

They speak, yet the masses do not hear..

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share

Leftists Are The Worst Trespassers In My Experiences

For years while I was growing up back home on my fathers property near the west side of the  Sawtooth Wilderness his left wing neighbors went all over his land whenever they wanted, took wood and whatever else they felt entitled to take.. Including stealing every last fish out of the families two acre pond.. Then when one neighbor stored his concrete forms on dad’s meadow, dad never paid it much mind.. Until the rascal was caught filing legal papers claiming he owned the land because his junk sat there for almost enough time to pull that legal scam off.. Costing the old man $50,000 to get the neighbor shutdown.. Yep, they’re died in the wool leftists..

Then for years at our property in the southern Wood River Valley, an anti hunting, anti guns, pro wolf, left wing neighbor was always snooping in our yard.. I knew this because of the wildlife cameras.. I never said anything because I wanted to see how far this fool was willing to go when she thought I wasn’t looking.. Until one day I’d had enough of it and told her to knock it off.

Caught in the act she claimed she was just getting a drink out of the hose bib, whereupon she attempted to draw me into a gun ownership debate, I told her I don’t care what she believes in about guns please leave..Uh no I did not make any threats… She’s never been back.. The thing is, she and her husband are very vocally adamant that people stay off of their property.. As can be seen in the article linked, the leftists hate property rights, unless its their property rights..

I suggest folks go stand around in the good professors yard and wait for the police to come, because he’ll call them.. These people are trouble makers.. They want to trespass and take pictures of whatever they think is wrong going on on right wingers property, and either sue em or get em busted by the state.. Hell these people are so protective of their property they won’t allow certain people to comment on their web sites because they only hear their own beliefs jingling around in their heads and don’t want to hear how wrong they are..

Yep, I say head on over to Uncle Maughan’s yard and set up your picnic and go to enjoying yourself.. Take a crap in his flower bed, observe the steam coming out of his ears.. Tell the old fart all you wanted to do was take a picture of his red face…Whats the big deal? By the way, I’d love to hear the property owners side of his little story where he always makes out that everyone that opposes his wants or actions are stupid hicks that say stupid stuff.. Sure uncle Maughan, sure….take a video camera along.. I bet ya ten dollars he gets violent and pushy..

 

Leftists want to control the narrative without opposition or questions. They’re superior intellectual legends in their own minds…I’ve made the discovery that while leftists talk a lot, act superior to others in every way, they’re really not that bright.. People that want to be other peoples conscience are usually mentally deranged if you ask me.. The live and let us live folks are normal.. The always into other folks business folks are all crazy..

 

Watch out for bill to change Idaho’s trespassing law

“Because this is the tradition of the West, the West is liberal. Most historians see liberalism as a political outlook and practice founded in the nineteenth century. But nineteenth-century liberalism was simply a temporary organizational manifestation of what has always been the underlying Western outlook. That organizational manifestation is now largely dead, killed as much by twentieth-century liberals as by conservatives or reactionaries…The liberal of about 1880 was anticlerical, antimilitarist, and antistate because these were, to his immediate experience, authoritarian forces that sought to prevent the operation of the Western way. …But by 1900 or so, these dislikes and likes became ends in themselves. The liberal was prepared to force people to associate with those they could not bear, in the name of freedom of assembly, or he was, in the name of freedom of speech, prepared to force people to listen. His anticlericalism became an effort to prevent people from getting religion, and his antimilitarism took the form of opposing funds for legitimate defense. Most amazing, his earlier opposition to the use of private economic power to restrict individual freedoms took the form of an effort to increase the authority of the state against private economic power and wealth in themselves. Thus the liberal of 1880 and the liberal of 1940 had reversed themselves on the role and power of the state…” Tragedy and Hope: A History of the World in our Time”, Carroll Quigley, Page 1231

Communitarianism views individuals as more or less interchangeable cells who find meaning in their contribution to the social whole rather than as free agents. Participation with whatever the social whole deems beneficial to the social whole.. Such as killing unborn babies.. Vaccines. Removal of anyone that refuses to be a participant of their social idiocy… See the left versus right… Both have killed whoever they want ever since they began their so called enlightenment here in establishing this Union of collectivist idiocy…

Thats right, the rightist persuasion is off kilter as well… Both of those lefty righty nut cases have been trampling all over the individuals freewill for centuries..

I have several maps, always know where I’m at, I never trespass, not for any reason ever, no excuses.. It’s called being responsible.. Knowing where you’re at is your responsibility not the land owners nor the states..

Heck, if ya argue back in support of your own intellectual intelligence, such as take your leftist conscience and keep it because I have my own conscience, they’re insulted, how dare you talk back to my superior conscience….These leftist idiots even want to trespass in your head…

Make sure ya slap uncle Maughan’s wife on her butt cheek while you’re camping in his yard.. After all it’s all public property ya know..

Share

How the COTUS Bill Of Privileges Can Be used to Screw YOU

Article 5 of US Constitution allows for all amendments to be … amended.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Article_Five_of_the_United_States_Constitution

“The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate.”

Working on it… Proves its a privilege.. If government can give you everything you want it can take everything you own, including privileges, even your life… Welcome to man made government…

Share

U.S. Citizens Are Real No-where Citizens Sitting In Their No-where Lands As Real Nobody’s

Elements of Ecclesiastical Law

Does anyone believe the Vatican is talking out of their ass here? Or could they mean what they claim? I take these people very seriously when they make these claims;

Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1 53-54 you will find the following:

“The Holy See and civil governments may be annulled by the Pope. Again, it seems to be commonly admitted that in all agreements entered into by the Sovereign Pontiff this condition is understood: Nisi aliud exigat causa gravis et extraordinaria propter bonum commune ecclesiae. (In other words, unless you show cause of extraordinary evidence that you are not ruled by the Pope you’re presumed to be ruled by The Holy See.)

Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1 53-54 goes on to say: “no national law can become legitimate except by at least the tacit or legal consent of the Pope. Again, the jus particulare of a nation always remains subject to the authority of the Holy See in such manner as to be repealable at any time by it. Hence, the jus nationtie, or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff.”

On the Rights; and Pereogitives Church is necessarily involved, in these things, though they be temporal, the Church may by right exert its power, and the civil state ought to yield.73“-In this proposition is contained the full explanation of the indirect spiritual power of the Church over the state.” The proposition is proved: 1. From reason.-Either the Church has an indirect power over the state, or the state has an indirect power over the Church. Then is no alternative. For, as experience teaches, conflicts may arise between Church and state.” Now, in any question as to the competence of the two powers,” either there must be some judge to decide what docs and what does not fall within their respective spheres, or they are delivered over to perpetual doubt and to perpetual conflict. But who can define what is or is not within the jurisdiction of the Church in faith and morals, except a judge who knows what the sphere of faith and morals contains and how far it extends? 7.

It is clear that the civil power cannot define how far the circumference of faith and morals extends. To do this it must know the whole deposit of explicit and implicit faith. . Therefore, the Church alone can fix the limits of its jurisdiction; and if the Church can fix the limits of its own jurisdiction, it can fix the limits of all other jurisdiction- at least, so as to warn it off its own domain.77 Hence, the Church is supreme in matters of religion and conscience: she knows the limits of her own jurisdiction, and, therefore, also the limits of the competence of the civil power. Again, if it be said that the state is altogether independent of the Church, it would follow 7. that the state would also be independent of the law of God in things temporal; for the divine law must be promulgated by the Church. It is unmeaning to say that princes have no superrior but the law of God;

Card. Tarqu., 1. C., lib. i .. p. 56, n. 55. 7S Manning, 1. C., pp. 70, 71. .• Craiss., n. 698. ,.
Cfr. Phillips, Kirchenr.. vol. iL, pp. 546, 547· .• Manning, 1. C., pp. 54, 55. 77 Cfr. Syllab.
r864, prop. 19, 20, 39, 42, 54?. Cra,ss .. n. 698.
of the Roman Pontiff. 255

7. for a law IS no superior without an authority to judge and to apply it. II. We next prove our thesis from authourity. \We refer to the famous bull Ullam Sallctam, issued by Pope Boniface VIII. in 13°2. This bull declares that there is but one true Church,·· and therefore but one head of the Church-the Roman Pontiff; that there are two swords-i.e., two powers-the spiritual and the temporal; the latter must be subject to the former. The bull finally winds up with this definition: “And this we declare, affirm, define (definimus), and pronounce, that it is necessary for the salvation of every human creature that he should be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” 5? This is undoubtedly a de fide definition-i.e., an utterance ex cathedra.”‘ In fact, the bull, though occasioned by and published during the contest between Boniface VIlI. and Philip the Fair, King of France-who held that he was in no sense subject to the Roman Pontiff-had for its object, as is evident from its whole tenor and wording, this: to define dogmatically the relation of the Church to the state·’ in general that is, universally, not merely the relations between the Church and the particular state or nation-France. Now, what is .the meanIng of this de fide definition? There are two interpretations: one, given by the enemies of the Papacy, is that the Pope, in this bull, claims,” not merely an indirect, but a direct and absolute, power over the state, thus completely subordinating it to the Church; 5? that is, subjecting it to the Church, even in purely temporal things. This explanation, given formerly by the partisans of Philip the Fair,by the Regalists in the reign of Louis XIV., and at present by Janus, Dr. Schulte, 7? Manning,!. C., p. 51. Phillips, 1. C., vol. iii., pp. 256, 257; cfr. Darras, Hist., vol. iii., p. 454.” Fessler, True and False Infallibility, p. 81. •• Manning, I. C., p. 51 82 Phillips, I. C., vol. iii., pp. 255. 256. •• Cfr. ib., p. 206 . Cfr. Manning, I. c, pp. 61-64.

ECCLESIASTICAL EMPIRE

“Those who know what Rome has once been,are best able to appreciate what she is.” – Hallam

Hmmmm….Sounds like we’re nobody’s in no where land..

The United States gave up all rights, title, and interest. If you claim to be a U.S. Citizen by your own admission, you also have no rights, no title, and no interest. “The United States of America by contract, gave up all right, title or interest in said property, without any conditions set forth;” [Ensminger Case 1995]

A.) ‘Our survey of the legal landscape as it existed in March 1989 indicates, that, in general, members of the public have no constitutional right to be protected by the State from harm inflicted by third parties. [E.g., Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84, 88 (4th

Cir. 1983); Wells v. Walker , 852 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. Denied, 489 U.S. 1012, 109 S.Ct. 1121, 103 L.Ed.2d 184 (1989); Ketchum v. Alameda County, 811 F.2d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 1987); Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).]

B.) Judge Posner aptly explained the reasoning behind this general principle when he stated in Bowers that:

The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties; it tells the state to let “We the People of the United States” alone; it does not require their agency federal government or their state(s) to provide services, even so elementary a service as maintaining law and order….for those not a party to the contract (Constitution).

Thus, because there is no constitutional duty to provide such protection for the Public at Large, {the state’s} failure to do so is not actionable under Title 42, section 1983, of the United States Code (U.S.C.). [emphasis added]

“But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breech of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact (contract), but he is not a party to it. The States are a party to it…” (emphasis added). [Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854)]

“The People” does not include you and me. “The Constitution was ordained and established by the people of the United States for themselves, for their own government, and not for the government of the individual States. Each State established a constitution for itself, and in that constitution provided such limitations and restrictions on the powers of its particular government as its judgment dictated. The people of the United States framed such a government for the United States as they supposed best adapted to their situation and best calculated to promote their interests.” [Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore. 32 U.S. 243]

Members of the public have no constitutional right to be protected by the State from harm inflicted by third parties. [E.g., Fox v. Custis, 712 F.2d 84, 88 (4th Cir. 1983); Wells v. Walker , 852 F.2d 368, 370 (8th Cir. 1988), cert. denied, 489 U.S. 1012, 109 S.Ct. 1121, 103 L.Ed.2d 184 (1989); Ketchum v. Alameda County, 811 F.2d 1243, 1247 (9th Cir. 1987); Bowers v. DeVito, 686 F.2d 616, 618 (7th Cir. 1982).]

No constitutional right exists under the Ninth Amendment, or to any other provision of the Constitution of the United States, “…to trust the Federal Government and to rely on the integrity of its pronouncements.” [MAPCO, Inc. v Carter (1978, Em Ct App) 573 F2d 1268, cert den 437 US 904, 57 L Ed 2d 1134, 98 S Ct 3090.]

Members of the public have no right to petition for a redress of grievance. [UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA in the case of “We the People Foundation, Inc. et al. v. United States,” No. 1:04-cv-01211 EGS, admitted in the Civil War era, however, the U. S. Congress enacted Rules abolishing the duty to respond, a change later sanctioned by the Supreme Court [see: 96 Yale Law Journal 142, 164 (1986); Bieregu v. Reno, 59 F.3rd. 1445, 1453, (3rd. Cir. 1995)]. Furthermore, U.S. FEDERAL Judge Emmet G. Sullivan in his Order and Opinion upheld the position of the UNITED STATES et al., to deny the Human Rights of “We the People,” et al., the “Right of Petition” in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DICTRICT OF COLUMBIA on August 31, 2005.]

There are no sovereigns citizens in the United States. That is an oxymoron.

“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects…with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472

Sovereignty: The supreme, absolute, and uncontrollable power by which any

independent state is governed; supreme political authority; paramount control of the constitution and frame of government and its administration… [Blacks Law 5th Edition page 1252]

Subject: Constitutional Law. One that owes allegiance to a sovereign and is governed by his laws. The natives of Great Britain are subjects of the British government. Men in free governments are subjects as well as citizens; as citizens they enjoy rights and franchises; as subjects they are bound to obey the laws. [Blacks Law 5th Edition page 1277]

Subject: verb. to bring under one’s control by force of arms — see conquer [Merriam Online Thesaurus] Subjected: transitive verb. [Merriam Online Thesaurus]

1 a : to bring under control or dominion : subjugate b : to make (as oneself) amenable to the discipline and control of a superior

2 : to make liable : predispose

3 : to cause or force to undergo or endure (something unpleasant, inconvenient, or trying)

— sub·jec·tion \ noun

“Citizenship connotes membership in a political society and implies a dutyof permanent allegiance to that society.”

-David Weissbrodt, Immigration Law and Procedure In a Nutshell.Citizenship: The status of being a citizen. See also Corporate citizenship… [Blacks Law 5th Edition page 222]

“Citizenship, is, by definition, a condition of allegiance to, and participation in, a governmental jurisdiction. It means, for a collective order, a pledge of loyalty, commitment to actively participate in civics and community, and willingness to serve when and where called upon. Citizenship begins within the individual but is nurtured by the country.” —Eduardo Aguirre, Director, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services

Sovereigns are not citizens. Citizens are synonymous with subjects and subjects are synonymous with slaves. As in Subjected. So look at this case again below. Did King George maintain his sovereignty over his subjects? Did the 56 signers of the compact gain their sovereignty because they signed the compact and not the rest of the people? The answer is Yes! As a U.S. Citizen or American, you are a debtor under the 14th amendment, due to your “choice” of nationality.

“…at the Revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects…with none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty.” CHISHOLM v. GEORGIA (US) 2 Dall 419, 454, 1 L Ed 440, 455 @DALL 1793 pp471-472 [Padelford Case of 1854 page. 35] *41

“Now the principle at the bottom of all these propositions is this: The States have no power, by the exercise of which, they can defeat all the ends of Government-the General Government, or any of those ends. But the States, by the exercise of the taxing power, can take from their inhabitants every cent the inhabitants can spare, and live. According to the principle of this decision, therefore, the States have no power to lay any tax on their inhabitants; and if they have no power to tax, it follows that they have no power to enable them to keep up their State Governments; and without State Governments, they have no power to keep themselves alive, as States. The principle comes to this: that the States, in making the Constitution, intended to give up the power of self preservation (sovereignty).” [Padelford Case 1854 pg. 35]

State citizens, State nationals, and Sovereign States gave up all power when they signed the constitution. And they weren’t states to begin with they were Royal Charters granted by the King. Something that is granted may be un-granted.

Sovereign States are: States whose subjects or citizens are in the habit of obedience to them… [Blacks Law 5th Edition page 1238]

You are NOT a signatory to the compact or the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America and “they” did not “pledge” for you…”they” did it for “their” posterity. You think that some “colonists” had some right? Then, why did the colonists not participate in any election or any “vote”? During the third presidential election why did only ten governors vote? I will tell you why….”the colonists” had no voice. These men were “proprietors” of company…the East India Company being the “Grand Corporation” with its “red, white, and blue” striped flag.

“We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defense, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.”

So, who did the “establishing and ordaining”???? It was “the People” of the “United States” who “ordained and established” THEIR Con-stitution FOR the United States of America.

Someone established rules and regulations for someone else. The one doing the stablishing and ordaining is in the SUPERIOR POSITION.

Where did they get the authority to do this? Easy: Article 6 clause 1….they assumed the debt repayment assurance of the United States of America to payback the debt to the King….PERIOD.

The word: Country means “to count trees”. It was the “count of the trees” or “The Rent of the Woods” that was an accounting procedure of the Exchequer in the Virginia Company and the East India Company.

You have no rights in the United States, because you are an American debtor under the 14th Amendment. The U.S.A. is bankrupt and has been since the drafting of the Treaty of Paris.

I’d rather be a man myself. Now I could go on, and add 150 or so of more pages verifying this, but then we live in a society with severe attention deficit disorder. They are clearly explaining the difference between the law makers, and the citizens. Problem is the citizens love their servitude. They don’t want to take responsibility to fix anything, they want someone else to do that for them.

They have contractual membership in the corporation they deserve, with fringe benefits that allows them the opportunity to choose another corporate representative to lead the corporation. Candidates are of course pre selected by the corporation itself.

Beatles – Nowhere man – Live in Munich 1966

This version is clearer;

Share

Book Review – “The Impact Of Science On Society”

By Bertrand Russell-1953 First Edition. The only way to accurately predict the future is to know that somebody intends to engineer it.. Falls right inline with the Iron Mountain Report, The First “Global” Revolution by The Club of Rome, Limits to Growth, The Origin Of Species, Our Global Neighborhood, Earth Summit Agenda 21{2100 conclusion date} And of course the United Nations “Environmental” Policies- Global Biodiversity Assessment.. Scientism is Eugenics on Steroids..

Pages 40-41

I think the subject which will be of most importance politically is mass psychology … Its importance has been enormously increased by the growth of modern methods of propaganda. Of these the most influential is what is called ‘education.’ Religion plays a part, though a diminishing one; the press, the cinema, and the radio play an increasing part … It may be hoped that in time anybody will be able to persuade anybody of anything if he can catch the patient young and is provided by the State with money and equipment.

The subject will make great strides when it is taken up by scientists under a scientific dictatorship … The social psychologists of the future will have a number of classes of school children on whom they will try different methods of producing an unshakable conviction that snow is black. Various results will soon be arrived at. First, that the influence of home is obstructive. Second, that not much can be done unless indoctrination begins before the age of ten. Third, that verses set to music and repeatedly intoned are very effective. Fourth, that the opinion that snow is white must be held to show a morbid taste for eccentricity. But I anticipate. It is for future scientists to make these maxims precise and discover exactly how much it costs per head to make children believe that snow is black, and how much less it would cost to make them believe it is dark gray.

Although this science will be diligently studied, it will be rigidly confined to the governing class. The populace will not be allowed to know how its convictions were generated. When the technique has been perfected, every government that has been in charge of education for a generation will be able to control its subjects securely without the need of armies or policemen.

Pages 49-50

Scientific societies are as yet in their infancy … It is to be expected that advances in physiology and psychology will give governments much more control over individual mentality than they now have even in totalitarian countries. Fitche laid it down that education should aim at destroying free will, so that, after pupils have left school, they shall be incapable, throughout the rest of their lives, of thinking or acting otherwise than as their schoolmasters would have wished … Diet, injections, and injunctions will combine, from a very early age, to produce the sort of character and the sort of beliefs that the authorities consider desirable, and any serious criticism of the powers that be will become psychologically impossible …

The Nazis were more scientific than the present rulers of Russia … If they had survived, they would probably have soon taken to scientific breeding. Any nation which adopts this practice will, within a generation, secure great military advantages. The system, one may surmise, will be something like this: except possibly in the governing aristocracy, all but 5 per cent of males and 30 per cent of females will be sterilised. The 30 per cent of females will be expected to spend the years from eighteen to forty in reproduction, in order to secure adequate cannon fodder. As a rule, artificial insemination will be preferred to the natural method …

Gradually, by selective breeding, the congenital differences between rulers and ruled will increase until they become almost different species. A revolt of the plebs would become as unthinkable as an organised insurrection of sheep against the practice of eating mutton.

Page 54

After all, most civilised and semi-civilised countries known to history and had a large class of slaves or serfs completely subordinate to their owners. There is nothing in human nature that makes the persistence of such a system impossible. And the whole development of scientific technique has made it easier than it used to be to maintain a despotic rule of a minority. When the government controls the distribution of food, its power is absolute so long as they can count on the police and the armed forces. And their loyalty can be secured by giving them some of the privileges of the governing class. I do not see how any internal movement of revolt can ever bring freedom to the oppressed in a modern scientific dictatorship.

Pages 103-104

I do not pretend that birth control is the only way in which population can be kept from increasing. There are others, which, one must suppose, opponents of birth control would prefer. War, as I remarked a moment ago, has hitherto been disappointing in this respect, but perhaps bacteriological war may prove more effective. If a Black Death could be spread throughout the world once in every generation survivors could procreate freely without making the world too full. There would be nothing in this to offend the consciences of the devout or to restrain the ambitions of nationalists. The state of affairs might be somewhat unpleasant, but what of that? Really high-minded people are indifferent to happiness, especially other people’s. However, I am wandering from the question of stability, to which I must return.

There are three ways of securing a society that shall be stable as regards population. The first is that of birth control, the second that of infanticide or really destructive wars, and the third that of general misery except for a powerful minority. All these methods have been practiced: the first, for example, by the Australian aborigines; the second by the Aztecs, the Spartans, and the rulers of Plato’s Republic; the third in the world as some Western internationalists hope to make it and in Soviet Russia … Of these three, only birth control avoids extreme cruelty and unhappiness for the majority of human beings. Meanwhile, so long as there is not a single world government there will be competition for power among the different nations. And as increase of population brings the threat of famine, national power will become more and more obviously the only way of avoiding starvation. There will therefore be blocs in which the hungry nations band together against those that are well fed. That is the explanation of the victory of communism in China.

Page 105

The need for a world government, if the population problem is to be solved in any humane manner, is completely evident on Darwinian principles.

Page 110

A society is not stable unless it is on the whole satisfactory to the holders of power and the holders of power are not exposed to the risk of successful revolution.

Pages 110-111

First, as regards physical conditions. Soil and raw materials must not be used up so fast that scientific progress cannot continually make good the loss by means of new inventions and discoveries … If raw materials are not to be used up too fast, there must not be free competition for their acquisition and use but an international authority to ration them in – such quantities as may from time to time seem compatible with continued industrial prosperity. And similar considerations apply to soil conservation.

Second, as regards population … To deal with this problem it will be necessary to find ways of preventing an increase in world population. If this is to be done otherwise than by wars, pestilences, and famines, it will demand a powerful international authority. This authority should deal out the world’s food to the various nations in proportion to their population at the time of the establishment of the authority. If any nation subsequently increased its population it should not on that account receive any more food. The motive for not increasing population would therefore be very compelling.

Share

The High School Diploma Paradigm

Is a high school diploma of 1950 equal to a graduate with a 1970 diploma? And a 1980 high school diploma as worthy as a 2000 diploma.. And now lets go out to 2020.. I suggest this because the education has changed dramatically in that time frame.. So the 1975 graduate in discussion with the 1995 graduate will sound to the 95 grad as if the 75 grad has no education, thus no diploma.. And of course the 95 grad sounds insane to the 75 grad.. Basically I’m suggesting that those older diplomas are out dated, obsolete.. My 75 diploma is a worthless piece of scrap paper.. And then of course many of us have various levels of academic credentials and we’ve kept up to date with the changes and reeducation process as those requirements have evolved over time, changes and improvements in whatever it is we do professionally.. We used to do this on our own, now most licensed professions, mine included require we update our education.. They call it reeducation and we now pay for that.. It amounts to “teaching” me how to do something I already know how to do on my own, and they get paid. If I refuse they suspend the certificates.. It’s of course just more nanny State bullshit… And of course everyone, well almost everyone, simply bent over grabbed their ankles and accepted the rectal violation..

The purpose of mandatory public education in this country;

1) The adjustive or adaptive function. Schools are to establish fixed habits of reaction to authority. This, of course, precludes critical judgment completely. It also pretty much destroys the idea that useful or interesting material should be taught, because you can’t test for reflexive obedience until you know whether you can make kids learn, and do, foolish and boring things.
2) The integrating function. This might well be called “the conformity function,” because its intention is to make children as alike as possible. People who conform are predictable, and this is of great use to those who wish to harness and manipulate a large labor force.
3) The diagnostic and directive function. School is meant to determine each student’s proper social role. This is done by logging evidence mathematically and anecdotally on cumulative records. As in “your permanent record.” Yes, you do have one.
4) The differentiating function. Once their social role has been “diagnosed,” children are to be sorted by role and trained only so far as their destination in the social machine merits – and not one step further. So much for making kids their personal best.
5) The selective function. This refers not to human choice at all but to Darwin’s theory of natural selection as applied to what he called “the favored races.” In short, the idea is to help things along by consciously attempting to improve the breeding stock. Schools are meant to tag the unfit – with poor grades, remedial placement, and other punishments – clearly enough that their peers will accept them as inferior and effectively bar them from the reproductive sweepstakes. That’s what all those little humiliations from first grade onward were intended to do: wash the dirt down the drain.
6) The propaedeutic function. The societal system implied by these rules will require an elite group of caretakers. To that end, a small fraction of the kids will quietly be taught how to manage this continuing project, how to watch over and control a population deliberately dumbed down and declawed in order that government might proceed unchallenged and corporations might never want for obedient labor.

Thank goodness you got that diploma…

We want one class of persons to have a liberal education
and we want another class of persons,
a very much larger class of necessity,
to forgo the privileges of a liberal education.”
— Woodrow Wilson (1909)
Whatta deal.. Where do I sign up for that diploma….

I was just thinking we should Ban long-range social engineering…

What a magnificent public schools system, fact is it’s free, just drop your children off and let em be brainwashed by state indoctrination gurus..
The aim.. . is simply to reduce as many individuals as possible to the same safe level, to breed and train a standardized citizenry, to put down dissent and originality.
an educational system deliberately designed to produce mediocre intellects, to hamstring the inner life, to deny students appreciable leadership skills, and to ensure docile and incomplete citizens – all in order to render the populace “manageable.” Certified Manageable dummy’s.. A scientific management of children, preparing them to be scientifically managed as grown up people yet childish in their minds.. Thus manageable by a parens patria daddy…Big brother.. Elite knowitallists…

It isn’t really free because you trade in your mind for theirs…

Don’t forget your lunch money kiddies…

Share