August 14, 2020

The Poison In Every Cup And Every Bite


Muslim Student tries to Challenge Ravi Zacharias


Wolf Farming and other Rewilding Madness Implemented In the Lower 48

If a group of wealthy elitist banking cartel “gurus” who are openly members of various eugenicist groups come up with a plan to save the ecological and biodiversity as defined by their bought and tell it this way scientific community about the earth critical thinking individuals might want to go hmmmmm…

A brief deep synopsis of REWILDING being used to push existing infrastructure out of various regions of the NRMs.. Various groups on both sides of the political paradigm are in denial about this. On the implementation side of the issue they struggle to cover this evidence up.. On the other side of this issue they ignore it, aren’t interested in exposing it, and worse don’t examine the origins of this information exposing the thinkers behind implementation through social engineering and action by useful tools both in public office and in the private sector implementing and advocating for this madness..

The Reintroduction of Wolves in the Northern Rockies was merely a small part within a larger method for some in the service of ‘We The People” at the U.N.{See the official U.N. political Charter}, those “movers” for Making Money, REWILDING private lands next to public lands to cause bankruptcies of private land holders, end cattle and sheep farming for the purpose of confiscating via cheap buy outs of lands for the purpose of wilderness expansion, all under the guise of ecological restoration – REWILDING.. The beginning of the downsizing of the economic model to only support depopulation objectives of direct and indirect drivers, people..

Those real movers are; Our Global Community, The report of the Commission On Global Governance. Earth Summit Agenda 2100 The U.N.s plan of Action from Rio.. Of course the Global Biodiversity {Perversity} Report – United Nations “Environmental” Policies – Depopulation of Direct and Indirect Drivers = people allegedly the cause of the damage to the eco system that the various environmentalist cults rail on and on about… Openly discussed in various think tank and U.N. documents and books and manual releases over the years.. The First Global Revolution – A Report By The Council Of The Club of Rome… Ah again, depopulation is a must…

And of course their “The Limits To Growth” tome… Lets not forget the over population of people mantra pushed by every environmental group out there, their Bible, the Population Bomb…the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves – Now known as REWILDING.. “The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT… World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF) World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves… The 1001: A Nature Trust; The 1001 Club; World Conservation and Wildlife Trust… U.N. World Bank; IMF… Thats those movers.. The crew that captured and released wolves were merely useful tools..

World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)
World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
Founders –
Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller

“The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organization founded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is the world’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

“The group’s mission is “to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.”[7] Currently, much of its work focuses on the conservation of three biomes that contain most of the world’s biodiversity: oceans and coasts, forests, and freshwater ecosystems. Among other issues, it is also concerned with endangered species, pollution and climate change.”

The United Nations “Environmental” Policies pushing the scientism of biological and ecological diversity perversity presumes they have authority over every man woman and child on earth, and as such, seeks to ban all multiple uses of forest products, of course guns, and hunting from being activities of the slaves they want to control, dominate, even go as far as culling them..

Of course lets not forget the Pope’s, Francis Ecclesiastical released concerning this issue a few short years ago.. All connected to climate change altering habitats thus used as justification for large predators eating up resources that are allegedly over eating said habitat..

All the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against mankind.. Sustainable Development is Eugenics..

Anyway, the origination of the concept pushed by these elite thinkers pushing cleverly disguised eugenics they have socially engineered into the mindless followers of various environmental groups is irrefutable..


Romans 12:2


The Lollipop Mythos of Popular US History

No Citizen Can Own Property

The Lollipop Mythos of Popular US History

Political charters for centuries have been instruments for the creation of corporate countries. Given an understanding of the nature of Chartered, contractual, compacts constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense.. 28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?
(A) a Federal corporation

In control of all corporations federal or private which have been created using the same corporate model as the Federal Corporation..

It’s all business..

All countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

So obviously the citizenry are not the owners deciding what their private corporation does with it’s vast properties..

Countries are therefore, The Great Trading Corporations of their Owners –
Read under the title heading, §6. The Great Trading Corporations, on page 7 of,
A treatise on the law of private corporations
by Elliott, Charles B. (Charles Burke), 1861-1935; Abbott, Howard S. (Howard Strickland), 1864-1944
Published 1911

“By the law of England, before the Declaration of Independence, the lands of a man dying intestate and without lawful heirs reverted by escheat to the king as the sovereign lord; but the king’s title was not complete without an actual entry upon the land, or judicial proceedings to ascertain the want of heirs and devisees. Attorney General v. Mercer, 8 App. Cas. 767, 772; 2 Bl. Comm. 245. The usual form of proceeding for this purpose was by an inquisition or inquest of office before a jury, which was had upon a commission out of the court of chancery, but was really a proceeding at common law; and, if it resulted in favor of the king, then, by virtue of ancient statutes, any one claiming title in the lands might by leave of that court, file a traverse, in the nature of a plea or defense to the king’s claim, and not in the nature of an original suit. Lord Somers, in The Bankers’ Case, 14 How. State Tr. 1, 83; Ex parte Webster, 6 Ves. 809; Ex parte Gwydir, 4 Madd. 281; In re Parry, L. R. 2 Eq. 95; People v. Cutting, 3 Johns. 1; Briggs v. Light-Boats, 11 Allen, 157, 172. The inquest of office was a proceeding in rem. When there was a proper office found for the king, that was notice to all persons who had claims to come in and assert them, and, until so traversed, it was conclusive in the king’s favor. Bayley, J., in Doe v. Redfern, 12 East, 96, 103; 16 Vin. Abr. 86, pl. 1…..By the constitution of 1836 of the republic of Texas (article 4, 13 ), it was provided that the legislature should, ‘as early as practicable, introduce, by statute, the common law of England, with such modifications as our circumstances, in [161 U.S. 256, 264] their judgment, may require.’ 2 Chart. & Const. 1757. And by the statutes of Texas, from the time of its existence as an independent republic, the common law of England, so far as not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of Texas, has been declared to be, together with such constitution and laws, the rule of decision, and to continue in force until altered or repealed by the legislature. Tex. St. Jan. 20, 1840; Pasch. Dig. (4th Ed.) art 978; Rev. St. 1879, 3128; Courand v. Vollmer, 31 Tex. 397; Barrett v. Kelly, Id. 476.

By the constitution of the state of Texas of 1845, it was provided, in article 4, 10, that the district court should have original jurisdiction ‘of all suits in behalf of the state to recover penalties, forfeitures and escheats’; and in article 13, 4, as follows: ‘All fines, penalties, forfeitures and escheats which have accrued to the republic of Texas under the constitution and laws shall accrue to the state of Texas; and the legislature shall by law provide a method for determining what lands may have been forfeited or escheated.’ 2 Chart. Const. 1773, 1781. ….’The object of such a proceeding is not simply to have a decree declaring the escheat, and vesting the title in the state, but, by and through process to be issued under the judgment, to divest, not only the title of persons entitled to take the property of the deceased as his heirs, if perchance any such there be, but also, by a sale, to divest the title of the state, and to start, and confer upon the purchaser, a new title, deraigned directly from the sovereign of the soil. Rev. St. 1777-1780….” HAMILTON v. BROWN, 161 U.S. 256 (1896)

Enjoy the cases below, it proves no one can own property, without fear of it being seized for any reason either by the U.S.State, one of it’s Estates or the king/queen of England.

“The cases of purchases of land by aliens and corporations, under the statutes of mortmain, are not in point. It is settled, that an alien or a corporation may, by purchase, take land, but cannot hold; and the doctrine is put on the ground, that if one by an executed conveyance, which is his own act, passes land to an alien, or corporation, he shall not have it back; but it shall belong to the sovereign, upon office found. It is otherwise in regard to the act of law. If the heir, of one dying seized of land, be an alien, the law will not cast the descent on him, because he cannot hold beneficially, and the law will not give with one hand and take away with the other, but will cast the descent upon the next relation who is capable of holding. For the same reason, an alien husband does not take as tenant by the curtesy, nor an alien wife take dower….

It is a well-settled rule of law in England, and in this State as well as in most, if not all, of the other States of the Union, that an alien may acquire lands by purchase, and may hold them against all persons except the King, or the State; but upon office found, the King in England, or the State in this country, may seize and have them. Co. Lit. 2; 1 Black. Com. 372. Different reasons have been given for the rule. Mr. Justice BLACKSTONE, on the page above cited, says that “if an alien could acquire a permanent property in lands, he must owe an allegiance, equally permanent with that property, to the King of England, which would probably be inconsistent with that which he owes to his own natural liege-lord; besides, that, thereby, the nation might in time be subject to foreign influence, and feel many other inconveniences. Wherefore, by the civil law, such contracts were also made void; but the prince had no such advantage of forfeiture thereby, as with us in England. Among other reasons which might be given for our constitution, it seems to be intended by way of punishment for the alien’s presumption in attempting to acquire any landed property.” One of the editors in his note (8) on this page remarks that “a political reason may be given for this, stronger than any here adduced. If aliens were admitted to purchase and hold lands in this country, it might at any time be in the power of a foreign State to raise a powerful party amongst us; for power is ever the concomitant of property.” He illustrates his position by referring to the course pursued by the Czarina of Russia to raise up a party and acquire an influence in Poland whereby she was enabled to dismember that devoted and unhappy Kingdom.

In the case of Governeur v. Roberston, 11 Wheat. Rep. 332, Mr. Justice JOHNSTON, in delivering the opinion of the Court, speaks of the rule as having been so long and so firmly established in the common law, that an enquiry into the foundation of it was a mere matter of antiquarian curiosity, and he then seems to approve what he had seen in an elementary writer, as the reason why the sovereign could not seize the lands until an office was found, to wit, “that every person is supposed a natural born subject, that is resident in the Kingdom, and that owes allegiance to the King, till the contrary be found by office.” There can be no doubt, then, of the rule of law, whatever may be the reason for it, that an alien may acquire by purchase, land or any other species of real estate, and may hold it against all persons except the King or State; and may hold even against the sovereign, until he may choose to have an office found, and process thereupon to have it seized into his hands. Among the modes of acquisition in England and in this State, is that by devise, or disposition contained in a man’s last will. Hence, in England, and perhaps in this State, an alien might take real property by devise, which would give him a good title to it, as against all persons but the sovereign….” TRUSTEES, DAVIDSON COLLEGE v. CHAMBERS’ EXECUTORS, 56 N.C. 253 (1857)

“….At common law, corporations generally have the legal capacity to take a title in fee to real property. They were prohibited in England by the statutes of mortmain, but these statutes have never been adopted in this State, so that the common-law right to take an estate in fee, incident to a corporation (at common law), is unlimited, except by its charter and by statute. But the authorities go to the extent that even when the right to acquire real property, is limited by the charter, and the corporation transcends its power in that respect, and for that reason is incompetent to take title to real estate, a conveyance to it is not void, but only the sovereign (here the State) can object. It is valid until assailed in a direct proceeding instituted by the sovereign for that purpose….” Leazern v. Hilegas, 7 Sargt., 313; Gonndie v. Northamton Water Co., 7 Pa. St., 233; National Bank v. Whiting, 103 U.S., 99; Angel & Ames on Corporations, Secs. 152-777; Runyon v. Coster, 14 Pet., 122; The Bank v. Poiteaux, 3 Rand (Va.), 136 Case is also cited in: MALLETT v. SIMPSON, 94 N.C. 37 (1886)and CROSS v. R. R., 172 N.C. 119 (1916).

Gas`tro`man´cy. n. 1. (Antiq.) A kind of divination, by means of words seemingly uttered from the stomach. gastromancy. 2. divination by the taste of ones burps or the flavor of ones farts. 3. gut feelings.

“Fantasy, abandoned by reason, produces impossible monsters; united with it, she is the mother of the arts and the origin of marvels”~Francisco de Goya

Tenant status via fee simple is not ownership of land it is leasing of the land.. It is also the opposite of true freewill and of freedom…For an experiment stop paying the States property taxes and learn who really owns the private land.. Below is a great depiction of a public lands owner..

The state is a mythical concept, a jejune concept, one that mankind needs to find the maturity to grow out of. The unquestioning acceptance of this myth, one saturated with internal contradictions, is that which defines the statist politically brainwashed left v. right paradigm Zombies….

Cognitive impairment has been and is the whole purpose of the Public Schools Academy Media Government spokesmen Public Relations Regime.

The prevalence of myths is astounding…


Globe vs Flat Earth Debate


Fake Science, Fake Experts, Fake History, Fake News, Fake Medicine, Might As Well Have Fake Food

It’s a fake fake fake fake world;


Why A Globe Earth?


More Than One Way To Get Skunked

A Charles Russel piece.


Cynthia G is Beautiful and Crazy

Cynthia G. reminds me of reading and listening to white separatists except she is a black separatist.. To funny..

Boule Society Of Nazis

The Boule Society or Sigma Pi Phi is the highest level African American secret society inside the United States and it works with Prince Hall Freemasonry and the Black Hebrew Israelite Movement. This Greek based organization also works closely with the Nation of Islam and Five Percent Nation. The Boule Society is extremely racist and uses racism as a weapon for divide and conquer. Boules are bullies. They are Black Nazis and they are involved with pedophilia and human sacrifice and they specifically target white people.

“a lot of people that have said to you white people what is what is your response to that” {well they’re not important enough for me to hate because for me the thing of it is when you don’t get is that it takes a certain amount of emotion to hate someone and it’s not really emotional for me is more like if you have like a rodent infestation or a pest infestation you know emotionally connected to it you just want to get rid of it so I don’t hate them I’m good at pattern recognition so I don’t hate anybody they’re not important enough for me to hate I think it’s stupid to assume that I that I hate them”}—Cynthia G

I don’t hate you, but you’re a rodent, a pest.. Who else say’s that? The U.S. government say’s we’re all pests in their legalese.. And animals.. And non compos mentis insane people because we cannot comprehend their terminally ill legalese terms bullshit..

1 U.S. Code § 1 – Words denoting number, gender, and so forth
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise—
words importing the singular include and apply to several persons, parties, or things;
words importing the plural include the singular;
words importing the masculine gender include the feminine as well;
words used in the present tense include the future as well as the present;
the words “insane” and “insane person” shall include every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis;
the words “person” and “whoever” include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;
“officer” includes any person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office;
“signature” or “subscription” includes a mark when the person making the same intended it as such;
“oath” includes affirmation, and “sworn” includes affirmed;
“writing” includes printing and typewriting and reproductions of visual symbols by photographing, multigraphing, mimeographing, manifolding, or otherwise.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §?6, 62 Stat. 859; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §?1, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 112–231, §?2(a), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1619.)

And who wrote that garbage? A bunch of white Anglo Saxon monsters.. Who go around wearing black robes..

But I’m a white rodent, vermin, a pest that never did a damn thing to Cynthia G…

{The United Nations Environmental Polices refers to us as Direct Drivers-Indirect Drivers-Animals, vermin, that are over populated and must be culled. Including YOU Cynthia..}

(d)The term “animal” means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish, and shellfish. (e)

7 U.S. Code § 136w–3 – Identification of pests; cooperation with Department of Agriculture’s program

(a) In general
The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify those pests that must be brought under control. The Administrator shall also coordinate and cooperate with the Secretary of Agriculture’s research and implementation programs to develop and improve the safe use and effectiveness of chemical, biological, and alternative methods to combat and control pests that reduce the quality and economical production and distribution of agricultural products to domestic and foreign consumers.
(b) Pest control availability
(1) In generalThe Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify—
available methods of pest control by crop or animal;
minor pest control problems, both in minor crops and minor or localized problems in major crops; and
factors limiting the availability of specific pest control methods, such as resistance to control methods and regulatory actions limiting the availability of control methods.
(2) ReportThe Secretary of Agriculture shall, not later than 180 days after November 28, 1990, and annually thereafter, prepare a report and send the report to the Administrator. The report shall—
contain the information described in paragraph (1);
identify the crucial pest control needs where a shortage of control methods is indicated by the information described in paragraph (1); and
describe in detail research and extension efforts designed to address the needs identified in subparagraph (B).
(c) Integrated pest management
The Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall develop approaches to the control of pests based on integrated pest management that respond to the needs of producers, with a special emphasis on minor pests.
(d) Public health pests
The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall identify pests of significant public health importance and, in coordination with the Public Health Service, develop and implement programs to improve and facilitate the safe and necessary use of chemical, biological, and other methods to combat and control such pests of public health importance.
(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §?28, as added Pub. L. 95–396, §?24(2), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 838; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §?1495, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3629; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §?862(b)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1174; Pub. L. 104–170, title II, §?236, Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1509.)

Cynthia G is a beautiful women, who is crazy as a shit house rat…

00:27 – When did Cyn start making videos 01:41 – Does Cyn hate white people 02:44 – Has Cyn ever been married to a white man 03:31 – Why doesn’t Cyn show her natural hair 03:55 – Why do you think people focus on your wig 04:50 – Does making videos affect Cyn’s personal life 06:50 – Is Cyn employable 07:45 – What keeps Cyn committed to making videos 08:46 – Cyn’s views on swirling 10:54 – Why is Cyn not married 11:46 – Is Cyn in a relationship 12:25 – Cyn’s views on colorism 14:22 – Who does Cyn get the most hate from 17:41 – What does Cyn want black men to do 18:43 – What does Cyn think of good black men 19:53 – Broken homes in the black community 22:38 – The importance of black fathers 23:59 – Thoughts on single mothers 26:23 – Thoughts on Cardi B 30:35 – Afro latinos denying their blackness 32:24 – How can we end white supremacy 34:09 – Who are the biggest delusionoids 35:18 – Views on religion 37:15 – Cyn’s inspirations 37:39 – Thoughts on so-called leaders of the community 39:27 – Frauds of the community 42:52 – Cyn’s views on biracial people 45:17 – Biracial people that identify strictly as black 46:10 – Asian community and black people 47:35 – Black people moving to Africa 48:21 – Cyn’s biggest pet peeve 49:24 – Cyn’s goals and future plans 50:51 – Cyn’s thoughts on people that you used to date interracially but now date black 52:30 – Cyn’s experience in the modelling industry 54:33 – Where does cyn buy her hair from 55:03 – Thoughts on supporting black businesses 56:05 – Message for black people 57:47 – Favorite music artists 59:06 – Thoughts on Bill Cosby 01:00:00 – Does Cyn think Bill Cosby is guilty 01:01:45 – The biggest lies trolls tell about cyn 01:03:19 – Thoughts Aboriginal American movement 01:04:46 – Does cyn practice voodoo 01:05:00 – Thoughts on abortions 01:09:17 – Cyn’s views on homosexuality 01:11:08 – Cyn’s advice for people wanting to become an activist 01:13:22 – What happens when people recognise Cyn in public 01:14:02 – Cyn’s thoughts on polygamy 01:15:32 – What are dust bunnies 01:16:32 – Are dark skin black women represented well.

Idiots to the left of me idiots to the right..  When will the extermination of themselves begin?

Oh boy… Just another day stuck in the Self Ennobling Papal Priests of Romes game farm…