June 22, 2018

Cynthia G is Beautiful and Crazy

Cynthia G. reminds me of reading and listening to white separatists except she is a black separatist.. To funny..

Boule Society Of Nazis

The Boule Society or Sigma Pi Phi is the highest level African American secret society inside the United States and it works with Prince Hall Freemasonry and the Black Hebrew Israelite Movement. This Greek based organization also works closely with the Nation of Islam and Five Percent Nation. The Boule Society is extremely racist and uses racism as a weapon for divide and conquer. Boules are bullies. They are Black Nazis and they are involved with pedophilia and human sacrifice and they specifically target white people.

https://ahuwahzeus583992924.wordpress.com/2018/03/22/bully-society-of-black-nazis/

“a lot of people that have said to you white people what is what is your response to that” {well they’re not important enough for me to hate because for me the thing of it is when you don’t get is that it takes a certain amount of emotion to hate someone and it’s not really emotional for me is more like if you have like a rodent infestation or a pest infestation you know emotionally connected to it you just want to get rid of it so I don’t hate them I’m good at pattern recognition so I don’t hate anybody they’re not important enough for me to hate I think it’s stupid to assume that I that I hate them”}—Cynthia G

I don’t hate you, but you’re a rodent, a pest.. Who else say’s that? The U.S. government say’s we’re all pests in their legalese.. And animals.. And non compos mentis insane people because we cannot comprehend their terminally ill legalese terms bullshit..

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/1/1

1 U.S. Code § 1 – Words denoting number, gender, and so forth
In determining the meaning of any Act of Congress, unless the context indicates otherwise—
words importing the singular include and apply to several persons, parties, or things;
words importing the plural include the singular;
words importing the masculine gender include the feminine as well;
words used in the present tense include the future as well as the present;
the words “insane” and “insane person” shall include every idiot, insane person, and person non compos mentis;
the words “person” and “whoever” include corporations, companies, associations, firms, partnerships, societies, and joint stock companies, as well as individuals;
“officer” includes any person authorized by law to perform the duties of the office;
“signature” or “subscription” includes a mark when the person making the same intended it as such;
“oath” includes affirmation, and “sworn” includes affirmed;
“writing” includes printing and typewriting and reproductions of visual symbols by photographing, multigraphing, mimeographing, manifolding, or otherwise.
(July 30, 1947, ch. 388, 61 Stat. 633; June 25, 1948, ch. 645, §?6, 62 Stat. 859; Oct. 31, 1951, ch. 655, §?1, 65 Stat. 710; Pub. L. 112–231, §?2(a), Dec. 28, 2012, 126 Stat. 1619.)

And who wrote that garbage? A bunch of white Anglo Saxon monsters.. Who go around wearing black robes..

But I’m a white rodent, vermin, a pest that never did a damn thing to Cynthia G…

{The United Nations Environmental Polices refers to us as Direct Drivers-Indirect Drivers-Animals, vermin, that are over populated and must be culled. Including YOU Cynthia..}

animal
(d)The term “animal” means all vertebrate and invertebrate species, including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish, and shellfish. (e)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/7/136w-3

7 U.S. Code § 136w–3 – Identification of pests; cooperation with Department of Agriculture’s program

(a) In general
The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify those pests that must be brought under control. The Administrator shall also coordinate and cooperate with the Secretary of Agriculture’s research and implementation programs to develop and improve the safe use and effectiveness of chemical, biological, and alternative methods to combat and control pests that reduce the quality and economical production and distribution of agricultural products to domestic and foreign consumers.
(b) Pest control availability
(1) In generalThe Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall identify—
(A)
available methods of pest control by crop or animal;
(B)
minor pest control problems, both in minor crops and minor or localized problems in major crops; and
(C)
factors limiting the availability of specific pest control methods, such as resistance to control methods and regulatory actions limiting the availability of control methods.
(2) ReportThe Secretary of Agriculture shall, not later than 180 days after November 28, 1990, and annually thereafter, prepare a report and send the report to the Administrator. The report shall—
(A)
contain the information described in paragraph (1);
(B)
identify the crucial pest control needs where a shortage of control methods is indicated by the information described in paragraph (1); and
(C)
describe in detail research and extension efforts designed to address the needs identified in subparagraph (B).
(c) Integrated pest management
The Administrator, in cooperation with the Secretary of Agriculture, shall develop approaches to the control of pests based on integrated pest management that respond to the needs of producers, with a special emphasis on minor pests.
(d) Public health pests
The Administrator, in coordination with the Secretary of Agriculture and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, shall identify pests of significant public health importance and, in coordination with the Public Health Service, develop and implement programs to improve and facilitate the safe and necessary use of chemical, biological, and other methods to combat and control such pests of public health importance.
(June 25, 1947, ch. 125, §?28, as added Pub. L. 95–396, §?24(2), Sept. 30, 1978, 92 Stat. 838; amended Pub. L. 101–624, title XIV, §?1495, Nov. 28, 1990, 104 Stat. 3629; Pub. L. 104–127, title VIII, §?862(b)(1), Apr. 4, 1996, 110 Stat. 1174; Pub. L. 104–170, title II, §?236, Aug. 3, 1996, 110 Stat. 1509.)

Cynthia G is a beautiful women, who is crazy as a shit house rat…

00:27 – When did Cyn start making videos 01:41 – Does Cyn hate white people 02:44 – Has Cyn ever been married to a white man 03:31 – Why doesn’t Cyn show her natural hair 03:55 – Why do you think people focus on your wig 04:50 – Does making videos affect Cyn’s personal life 06:50 – Is Cyn employable 07:45 – What keeps Cyn committed to making videos 08:46 – Cyn’s views on swirling 10:54 – Why is Cyn not married 11:46 – Is Cyn in a relationship 12:25 – Cyn’s views on colorism 14:22 – Who does Cyn get the most hate from 17:41 – What does Cyn want black men to do 18:43 – What does Cyn think of good black men 19:53 – Broken homes in the black community 22:38 – The importance of black fathers 23:59 – Thoughts on single mothers 26:23 – Thoughts on Cardi B 30:35 – Afro latinos denying their blackness 32:24 – How can we end white supremacy 34:09 – Who are the biggest delusionoids 35:18 – Views on religion 37:15 – Cyn’s inspirations 37:39 – Thoughts on so-called leaders of the community 39:27 – Frauds of the community 42:52 – Cyn’s views on biracial people 45:17 – Biracial people that identify strictly as black 46:10 – Asian community and black people 47:35 – Black people moving to Africa 48:21 – Cyn’s biggest pet peeve 49:24 – Cyn’s goals and future plans 50:51 – Cyn’s thoughts on people that you used to date interracially but now date black 52:30 – Cyn’s experience in the modelling industry 54:33 – Where does cyn buy her hair from 55:03 – Thoughts on supporting black businesses 56:05 – Message for black people 57:47 – Favorite music artists 59:06 – Thoughts on Bill Cosby 01:00:00 – Does Cyn think Bill Cosby is guilty 01:01:45 – The biggest lies trolls tell about cyn 01:03:19 – Thoughts Aboriginal American movement 01:04:46 – Does cyn practice voodoo 01:05:00 – Thoughts on abortions 01:09:17 – Cyn’s views on homosexuality 01:11:08 – Cyn’s advice for people wanting to become an activist 01:13:22 – What happens when people recognise Cyn in public 01:14:02 – Cyn’s thoughts on polygamy 01:15:32 – What are dust bunnies 01:16:32 – Are dark skin black women represented well.

Idiots to the left of me idiots to the right..  When will the extermination of themselves begin?

Oh boy… Just another day stuck in the Self Ennobling Papal Priests of Romes game farm…

Share

All The World Deceived

Revelation 12:9 1599

And the great dragon that old serpent, called the devil and Satan, was cast out, which deceiveth all the world: he was even cast into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.

All The WORLD…

Cast into Here; An obvious containment facility.

The plane inside the containment facility is flat, except for mountains.. The world it sits inside of is concave. The structure it resides in is spherical and hollow. This is the Earth, it is flat concave and spherical. And there is only one way outta here..

Share

Check Out Those Curves!

There are explanations of experiments you can do yourself folks, just read Zetetic Astronomy by Dr. Samuel Rowbatham. He has about 300 pages worth, done in the 1800s, which means they should be repeatable and easier to do with better equipment now. Prove the curvature to yourself.. Once you try that one you’re going to go hmmmmm…This is easy to figure out. No rocket scientist credentials are required..

Share

Free Will in Scientific Psychology

Free Will in Scientific Psychology
Roy F. Baumeister

“In my opinion, it would be a mistake for psychologists to argue about whether free will exists and to debate the conceptual details. Philosophers and others have already spent centuries refining the concepts through such argument, and repeating their work would not be a good use of time and effort. In comparison with philosophers, psychologists are amateurs at conceptual refinement and debate but are specialists at conducting experimental tests of causal hypotheses. Our expertise is thus not well suited for ascertaining the existence or nonexistence of free will, which is probably impossible to prove. Psychology’s contribution lies elsewhere. Psychologists should focus on what we do best: collecting evidence about measurable variance in behaviors and inner processes and identifying consistent patterns in them. With free will, it seems most productive for psychologists to start with the well-documented observation that some acts are freer than others. As already noted, dissonance, reactance, coping with stress, and other behaviors have been shown in the laboratory to depend on variations in freedom and choice. Hence, it is only necessary to assume that there are genuine phenomena behind those subjective and objective differences in freedom. In a nutshell, we should explain what happens differently between free and unfree actions. Thus, the optimal agenda for psychology would be to find out what people mean when they use concepts of freedom, choice, and responsibility in their daily lives and then to illuminate the inner processes that produce those phenomena.” -pg 15-16

Share

What Is a Charter

What is a Charter

Charter – Contract – Political Charter – Constitution – Treaty – Is an issued document that brings into fictional existence a corporation. He who ‘grants, founds, creates or establishes‘ the charter remains the owner of that which is created or established by it, together with his assigns. Such as funding his assigns to appear to formulate the establishment of it, and manage it, for the owner… The money behind the establishing…

‘A charter is a document bestowing certain (fictional) rights on a (fictional corporate) town, city, university, land, or institution; sometimes used as a loan of money. The term derives from a root word meaning “paper.” As a formal document, a charter is the authorization (by its owner) of certain rights, purposes, and activities, which also include specific responsibilities (derived from its owners personal ideas, personal conscious or personal law).’
http://www.newworldencyclopedia.org/entry/Charter

Note. We are all vested or dressed with the responsibility and power, as ‘freewill’ provides from nature’s Cause or nature’s God, to follow our own personal conscious or personal law for ourselves, and in turn, create political charters as political units of our own privately owned fictional states or nations, that would reflect our own idea of personal conscious or personal law for others to ‘choose’ to follow. In so doing, this would provide a space for others to ‘act out their lives’ according to our vested power to make laws for our privately owned state, country or nation, and through which fictional state, those who would wish to act out their lives as members, could if we so desired as the owners of these chartered states, officially elect or otherwise, a selected body of people vested with the responsibility and power to make laws for our privately owned political chartered state, country or nation for its members to live by, and that did not conflict with our hidden interests as the owners of such a chartered country, state, nation, etc.

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions of someones imagination… Contracting with that someones Politically Charted Corporate Country that is their Fiction is then Slavery By Consent To the Corporate Fictions As Countries created out of the imaginings of those owners… So the man, should always know where he is in their world of corporate fictions and never lose sight of their legalisms versus YHWHs Laws..

Those who create their politically charted illusion then begin dispossessing people who have contracted with their creation of their freewill ‘freedoms’ and lands, and resources provided by those lands, for the restrictive practices of charters-contracts…Statutes – Codes for how They want the lands managed.. Obviously they are managing for scarcity, thus common sense causes us to think, Why?….There can be only one reason, land acquisition for their corporation thus themselves thus Depopulation… of people, people looked upon as animals by the owners of these corporate contracts.. Obviously even their assigns, political managers, hate us, the people standing around on their bosses lands…

 

Municipal Corporation

http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Municipal+Corporation

Municipal corporation

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Municipal_corporation

 

28 USC § 3002 – Definitions

(15) “United States” means—

(A) a Federal corporation;

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

 

The Charter of The City of New York 1819

https://ia600407.us.archive.org/28/items/chartercitynewy00nygoog/chartercitynewy00nygoog.pdf

Sourced:

http://archive.org/details/chartercitynewy00nygoog

 

District of Columbia – Organic Act of 1871

http://www.teamlaw.org/DCOA-1871.pdf

 

Report of the Charter Revision Commission to the Governor of the State of New York (With Proposed Amendments) 1900

p.53 reads:

AN ACT – TO AMEND THE GREATER NEW YORK CHARTER.

The People of the State of New York, represented in Senate

and Assembly, do enact as follows:

Section One. Chapter three hundred and seventyeight

of the laws of eighteen hundred and ninetyseven,

entitled “An act to unite into one municipality

under the corporate name of The City of New York, …

(Note.- By illustration, the members of the Senate and Assembly form the higher and lower executive employees, or high ranking agents of the corporation representing the stockholders, that is, the grantors, their assigns & beneficiaries; The people form the lower ranking contracting employees, or low ranking agents within the corporation; And the owners or stock-holders being the grantors, their assigns & beneficiaries of the corporation, remain hidden.)

http://ia700708.us.archive.org/22/items/abt2728.0001.001.umich.edu/abt2728.0001.001.umich.edu.pdf

Sourced:

http://archive.org/details/abt2728.0001.001.umich.edu

 

Greater New York Charter of 1901

https://ia700305.us.archive.org/29/items/greaternewyorkc00nygoog/greaternewyorkc00nygoog.pdf

Sourced:

http://archive.org/details/greaternewyorkc00nygoog

 

The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters and Other Organic Laws

http://archive.org/details/federalandstate04statgoog

___

History of the Origin, Formation, and Adoption of the Constitution of the United States

BOOK I.

THE CONSTITUTIONAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES, FROM THE COMMENCEMENT OF THE REVOLUTION TO THE ADOPTION OF THE ARTICLES OF CONFEDERATION

CHAPTER I.

1774 – 1775

Organization of the First Continental Congress. – Origin of the Union

Last paragraph of page 3 and the beginning of page 4 reads:

‘The political organizations of the colonies have been classed by jurists and historians under the three heads of Provincial, Proprietary, and Charter governments.’

(Note. – These are all forms of corporations that refer to their jurisdictional territory and ownership within a larger fictional label-title or fictional corporate title, or fictional corporate country.)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Province

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proprietary

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charter

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Congressional_charter

https://ia600407.us.archive.org/4/items/historyoriginfo06curtgoog/historyoriginfo06curtgoog.pdf

___

HISTORY of the ORIGIN, FORMATION, AND ADAPTION of the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES

BOOK IV.

FORMATION OF THE CONSTITUTION – VOL.II

CHAPTER I.

Page 7 reads:

‘Their written constitutions had taken the place of the royal charters…’

Page 16 reads:

‘So far as it could properly be called a government, it was a government for the States in their corporate capacities, with no power to reach individuals…’

https://archive.org/details/originformationa02curt

___

A PRETENDED CORPORATE TAKEOVER ON BEHALF OF THE PEOPLE ?

CONVERTING OR REPLACING ONE SUPREME JURISDICTIONAL FICTIONAL-OFFICE (KING)

OWNING FICTIONAL PROPERTIES UNDER THE FICTIONAL CORPORATE TITLES OF ‘COLONIES’,

FOR THAT OF ANOTHER SUPREME JURISDICTIONAL FICTIONAL-OFFICE (‘EXECUTIVE AGENTS OF OFFICE’)

FOR THE SAME FICTIONAL CORPORATE COLONIES AS RE-BRANDED TITLE NAMES

UNDER THE FICTIONAL CORPORATE TITLES OF

‘STATE’ CORPORATIONS OR UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATIONS (UNITED CORPORATIONS)

(Note.- The ‘common’ people can never acquire ownership since they are not the creators of these corporations. What is created remains in the ownership of its creator or creators and their assigns, despite the use of any ‘terms’ to be found in the instrument that ‘defines’ what has been created. For example, the term ‘people’. People are, of course, already ‘free’ on the land as ‘non-contracting parties or people’ under the jurisdiction of Natural Law. They are also ‘free’ to then contract with a fictional corporation in its fictional territory under its fictional jurisdiction, and become liable for the fictional corporations policies as, of course, ‘contracting-parties or people to an agreement’. If such contracts are no longer a benefit to people and they choose to remain contracted, then the position becomes one of Slavery By Consent: https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/04/05/slavery-by-consent-to-corporate-fictions-as-countries/)

http://www.ushistory.org/declaration/document/index.htm

 

The American Revolutionary War Never Ended

http://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20080202_american_revolution.htm

 

Definitive treaty of peace and friendship between His Britannic Majesty and the United States of America [microform] : signed at Paris, the 3rd of September, 1783 (1783)

http://archive.org/details/cihm_44215

http://ia600400.us.archive.org/30/items/cihm_44215/cihm_44215.pdf

 

TO THE VICTOR, THE SPOILS – Transcript of Treaty of Paris (1783)

http://www.ourdocuments.gov/doc.php?flash=true&doc=6&page=transcript

The United States is Still a British Colony

http://www.civil-liberties.com/books/index.html

USA a British crown colony

 

THE THREE CHARTERS OF THE VIRGINIA COMPANY OF LONDON

ftp://ibiblio.org/pub/docs/books/gutenberg/3/6/1/8/36181/36181-h/36181-h.htm

http://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/36181

 

The Virginia Company Of London, 1606-1624

http://archive.org/details/thevirginiacompa28555gut

 

Conquest ofVirginia, the third attempt, 1610-1624 : Virginia founded under the charters of 1609 and 1612 : an account based on original documents of the establishment of the colony, by the Virginia Company of London (1939)

http://archive.org/details/conquestofvirg1939sams

 

The First Charter of Virginia; April 10, 1606

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/17th_century/va01.asp

http://www.bartleby.com/43/5.html

http://www.virginiaplaces.org/boundaries/charters.html

 

A short account of the first settlement of the provinces of Virginia, Maryland, New-York, New-Jersey, and Pennsylvania, by the English. To which is annexed a map of Maryland, according to the bounds mentioned in the charter, and also of the adjacent country, anno 1630. London: Printed in the year MDCCXXXV (1922)

http://archive.org/details/cu31924104081074

 

A history of colonial Virginia : the first permanent colony in America, to which is added the genealogy of the several shires and counties and population in Virginia from the first Spanish colony to the present time (1923)

http://archive.org/details/historyofcolonia00crid

 

The Real Thirteenth Article of Amendment to the Constitution of the United States – Titles of Nobility and Honour

http://www.barefootsworld.net/real13th.html

Titles of Nobility and Honour Thirteenth Amendment Ratification and Publication Table

http://www.barefootsworld.net/13table.html

 

Rotunda for the Charters of Freedom

http://www.archives.gov/nae/visit/rotunda.html

 

A FURTHER OPPORTUNITY TO REAFFIRM THE SIGNING AWAY OF YOUR FREEDOM – Sign the Declaration of Independence

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/declaration_sign.html

 

The Constitution of the United States: A Transcription

Article VII.

Last paragraph reads in part:

‘In witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names,…’

http://www.archives.gov/exhibits/charters/constitution_transcript.html

___

Statutory Instruments 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY – The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997

http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/made

 

Encyclopaedia Britannica

International Law

Jurisdiction

(Paragraph 1)

‘Jurisdiction refers to the power of a state to affect persons, property, and circumstances within its territory.’

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/291011/international-law/233512/Jurisdiction

 

The Avalon Project – Documents in Law, History and Diplomacy

http://avalon.law.yale.edu/default.asp

SO WHAT IS A CHARTER? WHY IT IS A CON JOB OF COURSE…

Share

We’re The Federalist Academiacs We’re Here To Help You Out Of Everything You Think You Own

We’re from the Federal -State Department of super enlightened academics of all things because we says so.. We’ve gone to college and that means we’re qualified to tell people like you what to do how to do it and when.. and we have this degree we got through the process of curriculum vitae, we have accreditation , we drew off of the coursework from other institutions we read searched environmental, agricultural even industry standards. We are qualified to help you, honor us because we have the degree and we have a lot of us that went to college to the Mind Control University and we’re gonna decide for you.. we’re gonna help you and when you tell us no I don’t want your help then we’re gonna get mean with ya and force you to take our help one way or another. We’ll come in with guns, we’ll arrest you, we”ll show you you little peon.. You’ll be subservient to our help or else.. We’re the experts..We’re the department of super enlightened academics we’re there to help you.. We don’t like someone refusing to listen to us and not doing as they’re told by us because we know we know best.. Thats why we works for the big daddy Vicar of somthin or other.. If you argue with us, we’ll sue you, we’ll lien your tenant status on that land, we’ll freeze your bank accounts, we’ll shoot your dogs and we’ll sell your horses.. We’ll do you up right… You’re to listen and shut up.. We’ll burn your haystacks, we’ll confiscate your children, we’ll get the attorney general after you peon.. We’ll block your complaints, your contrary arguments, we’ll take those guns off ya too peon.. You will kiss our ass and swear fealty to us by gawd because this is OUR America…..Since we can’t talk you down we’re gonna take you down.. This is the New World Inquisition of Academiacs.. We’ve a special apartment complex for mouthy peons like you.. We have the small box underground special and the above ground stacked units.. You better shut up..

Be sure and enjoy that freedom now ya hear…

Share

For You True Believers Out There In Believe Itville

Often worth a repeat:

THE WORD, BELIEVE

The word “believe” has an ancient etymology, and is derived from the Sanskrit.
It is a portmanteau, a combination of two short words; “bel” and “eve”. It has gone through countless variations through time, and “bal” and eva” are two of the earliest.
When one examines the concepts these words were used for conceptually, we find that this is a dialectical portmanteau, with a tension of the opposites extant in it’s meaning.

“Bel”: has to do with jejune, rebellion, angst and “belligerence”, “bellum” “Bal” {an evil entity}, “ballistic” and a long nomenclature of similar conceptualizations put into a descriptive word.

“Eve”: has to do with nurture, nature, empathy, compassion, love, and understanding, equilibrium… also a lengthily nomenclature.

The original conjunction actually expressed an error of thinking, which comes back to us in more modern times in the form of “True Believer”, irrational certainty, fanaticism, and again associated with ‘bellum’ or war, and destruction.

This is why I make an attempt not to use the words ‘believe’, and ‘belief’ when self referencing. I like to use the term I “think” or “it is my opinion”. Or, “beyond reasonable doubt”, when making a strong judgment of my opinion.
[If I do use the term self descriptively, I mean it in the very soft and vague popular sense]

Belief is best defined in terms of “faith”, of believing without the need of proofs, as is demanded of many of the major organized religions. And this is where the word again takes on its original connotations, of erroneous thinking.

Hosea 4:6 “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast rejected knowledge”…
II Cor. 10:12 “For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves: but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise.”
In other words think for yourself!
1 Thessalonians 5:21 Prove all things; hold fast that which is good.
II TIMOTHY 2:15 “Study to shew thyself approved unto God, a workman that needeth not to be ashamed, rightly dividing the word of truth”.
DIVIDING:
SC GREEK 3718 “orthotomeo” to make straight, cut, to DISSECT!
Ephesians 6:13-14 “Wherefore take unto you the whole armour of God, that ye may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. STAND therefore, having your loins girt about with TRUTH”… emphasis added.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 “All scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: That the man of God may be perfect, thoroughly furnished unto all good works.”
PROVERBS 18;1-2 ”Through desire a man, having separated himself, seeketh and intermeddleth with all wisdom. A fool hath no delight in understanding, but that his heart may discover itself”.
Proverbs 1:7 “The fear of the Lord is the beginning of knowledge: but fools despise wisdom and instruction”.
Proverbs 1:20-22 Wisdom crieth without; she uttereth her voice in the streets: She crieth in the chief place of concourse, in the openings of the gates: in the city she uttereth her words, saying, How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?”
Proverbs 1:22 How long, ye simple ones, will ye love simplicity? and the scorners delight in their scorning, and fools hate knowledge?

Belief v Knowledge
The unbridgeable divide between believe and know … the believers — simply would not consider or accept that believe and know are not synonymous, that there is a chasm between the two words …
Believe, although having some slim foundation in evidence, signifies something unprovable (or perhaps less provable), and thus less firmly based in evidence, than know, whose foundation is firmly based on the provable and demonstrable. For example, we may believe there is minimal cost to creating an ebook of a pbook, but we do not know what that cost is — we can’t prove it or demonstrate it. The same concept holds true for any belief, whether economic, cultural, religious, scientific, or something else.
Unlike know, believe covers a wide range of credulity. Know is more constrained; its verity must be demonstrable. Believe needs no more than the statement “I believe” something to be true, leaving it to the listener to supply the factual base — no matter how slim or wobbly — for where to place the belief on the continuum that ranges from pure speculation to pure fact.
Believe denotes the acceptance of the truth or actuality of something, that it is real, even if it may not be real.
americaneditor.wordpress.com/2010/…/on-words-believ-and-knowledge/
rationalfaiths.com/epistemic-certainty-i-know-vs-i-believe/
http://www.learnenglish.de/mistakes/assumevsknowvsthink.html
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Epistemology

Epistemology (????????,episteme|knowledge, understanding|| ?????, logos|study of) is the branch of philosophy concerned with the nature and scope of knowledge[1][2] and is also referred to as “theory of knowledge”. It questions what knowledge is and how it can be acquired, and the extent to which knowledge pertinent to any given subject or entity can be acquired. Much of the debate in this field has focused on the philosophical analysis of the nature of knowledge and how it relates to connected notions such as truth, belief, and justification. The term “epistemology” was introduced by the Scottish philosopher James Frederick Ferrier (1808–1864). -Wiki

sophism
noun
1.a specious argument for displaying ingenuity in reasoning or for deceiving someone.
2.any false argument; fallacy.
Word Origin
C14: from Latin sophisma, from Greek: ingenious trick, from sophizesthai to use clever deceit, from sophos wise, clever
http://www.dictionary.com/browse/sophism

DISINFO’DOGS
Information Warfare
“The term Information Warfare (IW) is primarily a United States Military concept involving the use and management of information and communication technology in pursuit of a competitive advantage over an opponent. Information warfare may involve collection of tactical information, assurance(s) that one’s own information is valid, spreading of propaganda or disinformation to demoralize or manipulate the enemy and the public, undermining the quality of opposing force information and denial of information-collection opportunities to opposing forces. Information warfare is closely linked to psychological warfare.
The United States Military focus tends to favor technology, and hence tends to extend into the realms of Electronic Warfare, Cyber Warfare, Information Assurance and Computer Network Operations / Attack / Defense.
Most of the rest of the world use the much broader term of “Information Operations” which, although making use of technology, focuses on the more human-related aspects of information use, including (amongst many others) social network analysis, decision analysis and the human aspects of Command and Control.” http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Information_warfare

Almost all people are hypnotics. The proper authority saw to it that the proper belief should be induced, and the people believed properly ? Charles Fort

Someone be making war upon ya all…

Be careful what you believe now…

Share

Where Did The “Sky God” Go?

The “sky” God stepped aside and took up the position of conscientious objector when mankind chose to have their own Kings, presidents, scientists, what have you, whereupon man plays as his own god.. And as the story goes there is a nefarious fallen rebel angel influencing the chaos.. The problem that everyone seems to overlook is YHWH stepped out of the way and left us to our own self determination.. YHWH predicted the outcome. But stepped aside, we are on our own here because we wanted it that way. He stated that he cannot hear our cries to him because of our own madness. Obviously we cannot manage this Earth, this world system.. It doesn’t matter where we look, its being done wrong. And included in that is every single one of us refuses to look in the mirror..

All of us at varying levels of understanding our surroundings sees things that are wrong.. Nobody has the solution.. Not us not them, and not you dear reader, nor any of our little cliques of friends that think alike.. Knowing the architecture of the political power structure as I do, won’t help.. Knowing the so called scientific knowledge won’t help, isn’t helping..

The mass man and most of those semi awake cannot even correctly self identify. For example, I am a man, that phraseology leads us to an intellectual property owner who named me man.. Others have come up with other words and terms to identify me, as a human, a species, a race, and even as a resource, a PERSON, a corporate entity contracted with this corporate system. Those same crafty word term smiths tricked us into legally abolishing forced enslavement. Yet they created a system of legal voluntary slavery.

They also dumbed everyone down, they dumbed down Americans, and that means everyone. Myself, my friends, YOU dear reader, and your friends.. Everyone.. And the thing is, we cannot sit down and discuss the EVIDENCE.. It’s been made taboo.. Or most people just cannot face it, because it’s like walking through those places holding all of those lost animals, depressing. In conclusion, those people that some refer to as following some sky god, are no closer to understanding his divorcing mankind than the agnostic or atheist are.. The system worshippers holding onto the traditions of the system of men while holding the Covenants of YHWH in their hands at the same time are pseudo sky god believers. If we all meet the sky god someday, he will likely say he doesn’t know any of us.. So YHWH is not managing us..

We sold ourselves to the man gods.. It’s the same as a legal divorce with a restraining order.. He’s not going to interfere with each of us managing our own business that doesn’t include him.. He doesn’t work the way the man gods do, who want to force themselves and their alleged superior intelligence upon the rest of us.. Obviously most people don’t comprehend the rules.. The separate systems, the separate covenants.. Man made their own covenants and we’re all living it.. And as we can see everyone is crying about it.. Everyone is off in their little echo chamber groups crying and bitching about this messed up world system, all created by men..

And they’re asking YHWH to fix the system but the system is not his, he doesn’t want it, he never wanted it, he predicted how it would be and how it would end.. Without completely divorcing it, coming out of it, no longer being of it, and inviting him back into our personal spiritual consciousness that is asleep until he wakes it up, he can’t hear us.. We have to be sincere when ask him to wake us up.. If we’re still voting for man gods, that is insincerity.. We cannot have both..

Share

The Pathological Psychotic-ness of Normalcy in The Psychopathic World Society

What Does “Normal” Mean?

nor•mal?n?r m?l(adj.)
conforming to the standard or the common type; usual; regular; natural.
serving to fix a standard. .. of natural occurrence.
Category: Common Vocabulary, Biology, Medicine

approximately average in any psychological trait, as intelligence, personality, or emotional adjustment.
Category: Psychiatry

free from any mental disorder; sane.
free from disease or malformation.
Category: Biology, Medicine

being at right angles, as a line; perpendicular. of the nature of or pertaining to a mathematical normal.
Category: Math

(of a solution) containing one equivalent weight of the constituent in question in one liter of solution. pertaining to an aliphatic hydrocarbon having a straight unbranched carbon chain, each carbon atom of which is joined to no more than two other carbon atoms.
Category: Chemistry

(n.)the normal form or state; the average or mean.
the standard or common type.

a perpendicular line or plane, esp. one perpendicular to a tangent line of a curve, or a tangent plane of a surface, at the point of contact. the portion of this perpendicular line included between its point of contact with the curve and the x-axis.
Category: Math
Origin of normal:

1520–30; < L norm?lis, from norma
nor?mal•ly
Princeton’s WordNet

convention, normal, pattern, rule, formula(adj)
something regarded as a normative example
“the convention of not naming the main character”; “violence is the rule not the exception”; “his formula for impressing visitors”
normal(adj)
conforming with or constituting a norm or standard or level or type or social norm; not abnormal
“serve wine at normal room temperature”; “normal diplomatic relations”; “normal working hours”; “normal word order”; “normal curiosity”; “the normal course of events”
normal(adj)
in accordance with scientific laws
normal(adj)
being approximately average or within certain limits in e.g. intelligence and development
“a perfectly normal child”; “of normal intelligence”; “the most normal person I’ve ever met”
normal(adj)
forming a right angle
Kernerman English Learner’s Dictionary

normal(adjective)?n?r m?l
usual or ordinary
I’m just a normal guy.; It’s normal for a young child to sleep around 12 hours a night.; These are more efficient than normal light bulbs.; Flight prices seem lower than normal at the moment.
____________________________________
Yup..no doubt about it … normal is a conventional myth.

Share

U.S. Citizens Can’t Handle The Truth

And if you dig up this evidence and show it around they will hate you for it….Rather than admitting they have been completely deceived..There is their words, their signatures, their fruits, their actions… The historical record is crystal clear…As well, this is only the beginning as these legal opinions in no way exhaust the thousands of pages of legal evidence supporting these Supreme Court decisions..

RESPUBLICA v. SWEERS,
1 U.S. 41 (1779)

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/1/41/case.html

Penhallow v. Doane’s Administrators,
3 U.S. 54 (1795)
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/3/54/case.html

DELOVIO v.
BOIT
C.C.Mass.,1815.
Case No. 3,776, 2 Gall. 398

http://freedom-school.com/admiralty/delovio-v-boit-2-gall-398.pdf

Barron v. Mayor & City Council of Baltimore,
32 U.S. 243 (1833)

Primary Holding
The Bill of Rights applies only to the federal government rather than state or local governments, since there is no textual evidence to support a different view. {Except for those myths and fairy tales that these documents were for ALL men}

https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/32/243/case.html

Padelford, Fay & Co vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah

“But indeed, no person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact (contract), but he is not a party to it. The States are a party to it…”. [Padelford, Fay & Co. vs. The Mayor and Alderman of the City of Savannah, 14 Ga. 438 (1854)]

The courts decided in a little talked about case that the constitution is private compact and individual citizens had no rights to it.

Share