June 27, 2017

Maine Passes Bill That Unconstitutionally Targets Hunters and Fishermen

This is a tough one to address because I do not, in any way, shape or form, condone the destruction of anybody’s property, including “Posted” or “No Trespassing” signs.

LD 557, with amendments, has passed the Maine Legislature that, in summary, states: “The hunting and fishing
licenses of a person convicted of destroying, tearing down, defacing or otherwise damaging a property posting sign in violation of section 10652, subsection 1, paragraph B must be revoked, and that person is ineligible to obtain a hunting or fishing license for a period of one year from the date of conviction.”

There should be laws that protect a landowner from such destruction, and there probably are. Piling on to prove a point, while it might be a bit understandable, particularly to a frustrated land owner, cannot be justified by targeting a specific sector of the general public to punish that group for a law violation more than any other member of the public that is not part of the hunting and fishing community.

Even in testimony given in support of the law, a landowner states that he believes the majority of sign destruction comes from “hunters” shooting up his signs, but also admits destruction of his property, other than just signs, is being carried out by many different individuals and groups of individuals. Is it then constitutional to increase punishment on one group over others? I think not!

I’m not a lawyer but you don’t have to be a lawyer to understand that this law is not right. I am surprised that the Maine Legislature, the Governor, the Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife and others supported this law and could not see that it violates the constitutional rights of licensed hunters and licensed fishermen.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not looking for a dismissal of lawful punishment for the willful act of property destruction, protected by Maine law. However, in order to be justified in taking away the licences of hunters and fishermen for one year, then one must ask what is the punishment for the same kind of destruction that might be carried out by a snowmobiler, an ATVer, a hiker, a berry picker, etc.?

I believe the term that might apply to such an egregious violation of due process, can be found in Supreme Court cases that involve “unconstitutional animus.” If you Google that term, you can spend hours reading about what this term is and how it affects all of us. In brief, unconstitutional animus is a violation of equal protection under the law. In this case a hunter or fisherman, is not afforded the same due process and equal protection as someone else who might commit the same crime.

As a society we have been programmed to believe that the more draconian our laws are the more of a deterrent it is to prevent the crime in the first place. Whether that is true or not, I do not have the data to show one way or another. All drivers of automobiles that violate the law by speeding, are subject to the same set of laws and punishments. Would it be considered the right thing if hunters and fishermen were targeted for greater punishment because somebody believes them to speed more than other groups or individuals? This is what this new law allows.

This bill needs to be repealed and a different, constitutional approach taken in order to protect the rights of all people to ensure equal protection under the law, due process and to stop the obvious discrimination this law allows.

 

Share

Doing This Job Because It Needed Doing

If you’re going to do a job do it. Go all the way or don’t even start it.. What is UNEP – A. 2100? Their Global Revolution Community in its entirety.. Who is behind it, who works for who is behind it.. All of it.. the whole enchilada with the maggots falling out of it.. If you’re only looking at the various group facilitator maggots you aren’t doing the job. That means you’re in the distraction category.. The Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation and the Sierra Club groupies are all in the same category.. Along with various save hunting groups that are doing nothing, exposing nothing, just blabbering off rubbish.. I’ve discovered the most apathetic hunter groups are the ones with the biggest mouths, or egos..

What does the term Sustainable Development mean? It means exactly what the creator of that term meant it to mean.. Not what is being misinterpreted by everyone helping to implement sustainable development in various ways using new methods for everything we all do from laws to building to managing land to grazing or hunting.. It means setting up a new economic model that will only sustain a lower population of people objective.

Thus it is a long range new economic method of lowering the population of people who are allegedly over populated and are allegedly exhausting the earths resources and causing a massive extinction of various wildlife species and of people.. People are the cause, people are the direct drivers of this extinction by exhausting resources hypothesis..

The direct drivers.. So they say.. It should be noted that the thinkers behind this concept come from a long line of zoologists, biologists, entomologists, wealthy elites related to well known banking families who openly spoke of eugenics as a necessary scientific process for population control of people.. The process has been re-termed reworded and socially engineered into the citizen minds of this society who do not understand what they are going along with..Because if they knew they were implementing depopulation against themselves they’d be outraged.. That is exactly what sustainable development is, eugenics. Eugenics policies disguised as environmental policies..

Economically starving a society down to an acceptable population objective.. For people.. Who in the fk in their right mind would go along with that?

Complete idiots that’s who..

Only stupid people haven’t realized that the world is run by self serving conniving sons-of-bitches. I say stupid people, not “ignorant”, because the ignorant can learn when they are presented information. One is a stupid person if they are offered the information, and they compulsively hand wave it while claiming they have no interest in that.. Why? Because they are lazy suckers, too stupid to realize they have been conned – over and over again, by the same psychopaths that have run the world for centuries. Tyrants get away with it because they can always count on the lowest common denominator for support..

In the epistemology of the taut linear mind that mind will connect the dots, and find blank areas, and assume that means the dots are not connected down the line at some point. But these dots in fact have a trajectory that can be gleaned from their sequence. So when the trajectory of the connected dots is plotted, one can find the continuation of that trajectory in the dots further down the line. It is in ignoring the trajectories that eventually connect all the dots, that leaves the linear mind baffled frightened or bored by those who understand the points of the individual trajectories and point them out.

Apparently we deserve what we are getting.. Of course this business of creating masses of ignorant people to justify orchestrating their deaths by deceptive clever word term mechanisms is unjust unfair and extremely wicked.. Some of us did our job..

Eugenics, the science of improving the human race by scientific control of breeding, was viewed by a large segment of scientists for almost one hundred years as an important, if not a major means of producing paradise on earth.

Oh looky here! A nifty book all about a sustainable paradise…

Don’t forget now….If I invent a term in international ecclesiastical law it means what I say it means not what I trick you via double speak into believing what I want you to think it means… There are to many of you after all…

Hmmmm.. Might want to rethink on who is the most dishonest organization in the good old USA… A distraction like RMEF or their brother in arms the Sierra Club?  Or somebody bigger than them…

Maybe it’s time to quit looking down at those toes…Turn those eyes upwards a little higher…

Some of us did our job.. We did not lay down..

Share

“RMEF is the most deceptive organization in the U.S.”

REALPOLITIK, that is rule by caveat, not truth nor law. Certainty is a dead mistress.

Rewilding defined is a “a plan for removal of existing infrastructure”= Depopulation of people.. What people? You me us…The idiotic author of the quote used in the title here..{ All groups are pushing endless disinformation-The group responsible for this quote are just as bad as any of them};

The agreements for Agenda 21’s ‘sustainable development’ depopulation of America and the Earth, have not only been entered into through the political charters (constitutions) that establish countries, as with the case of the Republic of The U.S. (commonly abbreviated to United States), but where depopulation is not facilitated directly through their Federal and state constitutions, then depopulation is achieved through international or transnational agreements including non binding agreements while implementing said agreements (classified as treaties, conventions etc.,) having a higher order of precedence to constitutions and therefore taking priority over constitutions as all international law legally does as is stated being the Supreme Law of The land…

It is stated that Agenda 21 is a non binding agreement.. Meanwhile it is being implemented all over the USA and Canada.. And else where.. World wide..

It must be understood, that the heads of various Nation/States may determine that they will enter into agreement with the head of another or in the case of Agenda 21 other Nation/States as all of the United Nations Nation State Members, and where such agreements are struck, the parties to them are obligated to prioritize their Nation/States activities to ensure that the obligations to the agreements they entered into are fulfilled. Thus non binding agreement in the case of Agenda 21 is irrelevant. Sustainable Depopulation for the Development of Population Objectives goals set for people is being implemented worldwide..

“This is in line with the everyday occurrence of any adult having to adjust their priorities in their life to ensure that agreements they enter into with other parties are kept. Of course this will mean they set aside the rules under which they normally operate their households for their own convenience, to prioritize the fulfillment of obligations they willingly decided to make as adults with other parties. In similar manner, the heads of countries as country-households (government), set aside the rules (constitutions) under which they normally operate their country-households, to prioritize the fulfillment of obligations they willingly decided to enter into with other country-households or institutions. That is why treaties, conventions, agreements etc., take priority over constitutions, all of which are categorized as contracts, for the mere fact that they are all formal binding ‘agreements’ – meaning contracts.”—ThereIsNoDebt

Fabricating Consent For The Future You’ll Be Given Whether You Like It Or Not..Engineering consent.. Silent Acquiescence because of failure to comprehend their intentions gives to the minds of the deceivers consent.. If we look closely nobody appears to like it but they keep asking for it.. Apparently they fail to understand that Get Out Of Her That You Not Suffer Her Plagues means don’t look back.. Quit looking back at the dead delivering death.. All governments managed by the U.N. are demonically influenced. Thus we know what possessed men and women talk and appear like.. And those demonically influenced via possession people have a demonically possessed leader.. Sitting in his Palace leading this demonic chaos..So fabricating a future of demise.. many appear to like it right now.. But in the end nobody will like it.

So, is the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation the most deceptive organization in the U.S.? Not hardly.. Not even close.

Agenda 2100 is a set of guidelines for environmental action and social justice established by the United Nations in 1992 at a conference in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Had you read it you’d know you’re advocating for it.. Agenda 2100 sets out a variety of goals for public policy at all levels and for civic action by non-governmental organizations. These include fair trade practices, sustainable energy and urban development (i.e. more efficient zoning), and debt reduction for the developing world. Redistribution of wealth. Policy levels such as passing codes in order that governmental agencies have more control over what private land owners do on their land than the actual tenant owner.. The document claims many of ours including your activities are unsustainable. Although the U.S. government and no state or local government is legally bound by the United Nations Agenda 2100 treaty they are implementing it’s recommendations in all business, economic social what have you.. It is laced all through the new building codes.. Land management codes. Climate Change codes. Population objectives for people, just like wildlife or cattle. Talk about elite think arrogance..

If it doesn’t workout because it is a non binding agreement the agencies experimenting with it cannot be held legally responsible later..Agenda 2100 means the 21st century.. This philosophy has a conclusion set date of full implementation by 2100.. 83 years to go..To no hunting, no grazing, no privately owned property, to the man made Genesis Utopia you anti ranching hunting farming anti multiple use public lands advocates are advocating for.. In fact public lands will closed to the citizens by then.. It is all right there in those documents people never read, and probably could not comprehend if they actually tried.. Source material, 1992 Earth Summit Agenda 21 The United Nations Programme of Action from Rio.. With it’s Statement of Forest Principles so called environmental groups advocate for.. And the United Nations Environmental Policies Global Biodiversity {Perversity} Assessment 1140 pages.. Is it all good intentions? Nope.. Is anything financed by bankers and written by lawyers always a good a thing? Hardly… Is advocating for something you’ve never read and do not fully comprehend dumb? Absolutely… Maybe in 83 years those left alive will have the Nuremberg Trials Part two…

Consistently appealing to the very same personally owned private ‘constitutional devices’ that have brought the people of the world, sleep-walking into the madness of mass world Fascism and genocidal depopulation and irreversible contractual enslavement of the remnant surviving zombies to be left alive is absolute foolishness..

Share

Placing Responsibility For Agenda 2030 Where It Deservedly Belongs

Where this Environmentalist Holocaust Originates is interesting..

AGENDA 2030 – A CALL TO ACTION{FOR DEPOPULATION OF PEOPLE}

Agenda 21’s eugenics programme of worldwide ‘preparedness’ having been finalised, calls for its eugenicist ambitions to be put into ‘action’ with its successor, Agenda 2030, primed and ready to do just that; whose programme into action for the eugenicist depopulation of the Earth has been officially announced by the Holy See as law at the General Assembly of the United Nations on the 25th of September 2015.

It must be understood that when the Holy See gave his climate-change encyclical – preceding his appearance at the United Nations – as well as his speech at the United Nations General Assembly, that his encyclical is an ecclesiastical letter as ‘actual law’ for all of the Churches fictitious jurisdictions. Together with his official pronouncements as ‘law’ given at the United Nations General Assembly, these both quite rightly are to be taken as ‘personally owned private laws’ for fictitious jurisdictional territories.

We read last paragraph, that –

“In the early centuries the term encyclical was applied, not only to papal letters…”

Source:

Encyclical
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05413a.htm

Letters of the popes:

We read from the 1st paragraph –

The popes began early, by virtue of the primacy, to issue laws as well for the entire Church as for individuals. This was done in the form of letters. Such letters were sent by the popes either of their own will or when application was made to them by synods, bishops, or individual Christians.”

We also read and learn –

“Following the example of the Roman emperors the popes soon established archives (scrinium) in which copies of their letters were placed as memorials for further use, and as proofs of authenticity.”

Source:

Ecclesiastical Letters
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09202a.htm

~

The Pope is an example of a Roman emperor –

Source:

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iii/

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

John 8:44

[44] You are of your father the devil, and the desires of your father you will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and he stood not in the truth; because truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father thereof.

http://www.drbo.org/chapter/50008.htm

__

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

_______

GOD OF PHARAOH AND HOLDER OF THE PERPETUALLY SELF-ENNOBLING PROPRIETARY SYSTEM OF DOMINANCE THAT IS OF NOBILITY— Of Pontifex Maximus

 

~

114-115 Supremacy of the Papal Power –

Innocent III here gives an interesting statement of the theory of papal supremacy and of the relations existing between papacy and empire. Innocent III to Acerbius, prior, and to the other clergy in Tuscany. As God, the creator of the universe, set two great lights in the firmament of heaven, the greater light to rule the day, and the lesser light to rule the night [Gen. 1:15, 16], so He set two great dignities in the firmament of the universal church, . . . the greater to rule the day, that is, souls, and the lesser to rule the night, that is, bodies. These dignities are the papal authority and the royal power. And just as the moon gets her light from the sun, and is inferior to the sun in quality, quantity, position, and effect, so the royal power gets the splendor of its dignity from the papal authority. . . .

http://oll.libertyfund.org/titles/2277

~

I saw the coward on the stairway I did I did… He was looking at his toes…

So for more than 2000 years now the Devil huffed and puffed ’till he blew his disguise clean off and stands revealed as The New Rome… Risen From the Ashes to bring forth more death..

Share

Money vs Currency

Share

Who’s Fault Is It? Slave Or Oppressor?

“It has been usual for men to think and to say, “Many men are slaves because one is an oppressor; let us hate the oppressor.” Now, however, there is among an increasing few a tendency to reverse this judgment, and to say, “One man is an oppressor because many are slaves; let us despise the slaves.” The truth is that oppressor and slave are cooperators in ignorance, and, while seeming to afflict each other, are in reality afflicting themselves. A perfect Knowledge perceives the action of law in the weakness of the oppressed and the misapplied power of the oppressor. A perfect Love, seeing the suffering which both states entail, condemns neither. A perfect Compassion embraces both oppressor and oppressed.  He who has conquered weakness, and has put away all selfish thoughts, belongs neither to oppressor nor oppressed. He is free.”  ~James Allen

“Law, not confusion, is the dominating principle in the universe. Justice, not injustice, is the soul and substance of life. And righteousness, not corruption, is the molding and moving force in the spiritual government of the world. This being so, man has but to right himself to find that the universe is right; and during the process of putting himself right, he will find that as he alters his thoughts toward things and other people, things and other people will alter toward him…”  ~As a Man Thinketh,  by James Allen

“The people always have some champion whom they set over them and nurse into greatness…. This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector.”~Plato, The Republic, bk. 8, sct. 565:
Share

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/the-law/

Category:Political charters
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Political_charters

Given an understanding of the nature of constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense –

28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions

(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.

In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?

Answer:

(A) a Federal corporation

Sourced:

http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002

~

The incorporation of the United States is entirely lawful. It must be understood that all countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

The following video provides for an excellent explanation of agents in the service of their masters ‘updating’ administratively their owners interests, however, it is misguided in the view it takes on constitutions, in that somehow congressional approval is required to enact legislation –

THE UNITED STATES CORPORATION COMPANY: the de facto government
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9VFyQb2kqO0

United States Corporation Company
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/01/articles-of-incorporation-of-u-s-corp-company.pdf

Sourced:

Source Documents
http://anticorruptionsociety.com/source-documents/

Once again, what needs to be thoroughly appreciated is this –

Political Charters Create Corporate Countries As Fictions
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/04/28/the-law/

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
(Nature’s Cause As The Only Exceptional Fiction – Cause & Effect)
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

Countries are therefore, The Great Trading Corporations of their Owners –

Read under the title heading, §6. The Great Trading Corporations, on page 7 of,

A treatise on the law of private corporations
by Elliott, Charles B. (Charles Burke), 1861-1935; Abbott, Howard S. (Howard Strickland), 1864-1944
Published 1911
https://archive.org/details/onlawofprivateco00elli

(It can now be seen that the word country is synonymous with the word corporation)

Of course, for any opinions taken from whomever they originate with, on page 10 under the title heading, §8. The juristic person, ‘the juristic person’ will always remain a fiction attaching itself to the fictitious jurisdictional territory belonging to the Owners of a personally owned private fictitious trading corporate country as a business, regardless of the wishful thinking of mere respected opinion. Opinion being of course the fictitious imaginings of an individual, whether or not that fiction is shared by others.

For the ‘juristic person’ to attach to those to be found in the physical world under the authority of ‘true’ Natural Law and its true Rule of Law, requires their ‘membership’ to the traditions-of-men whose traditions are, of course, merely fictions; and that would require individuals to ‘knowingly’ consent to membership.

‘knowing consent’ necessitates ‘full-disclosure’ for there to be legitimacy in not falling foul of conditions that nullify and void (null and void) any arrangements entered into without it –

PUBLIC SERVICE, COMMON SENSE AND THE LAW – PART I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/08/20/public-service-common-sense-and-the-law-part-i/

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
(Nature’s Cause As The Only Exceptional Fiction – Cause & Effect)
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

~

Given an appreciation of the personally owned private corporate nature of countries, as they should quite rightly be understood, the necessity of the US representatives presence in London to secure agreement with HM Government, with regards to social security arrangements, becomes clearer –

Statutory Instruments 1997 No. 1778 SOCIAL SECURITY – The Social Security (United States of America) Order 1997
http://www.legislation.gov.uk/uksi/1997/1778/made

* [2] British parliament to look into Prince Charles’s veto power over laws
https://youtu.be/M_HnmyyOzus

When taken in their proper ‘full-context’, the informations that are required reading, concerning Prince Charles’ veto powers, can be found under the subtitled heading, SEQUENCE OF DOING BUSINESS USING WRITTEN INSTRUMENTS AS CONTRACTS, to be found part way down the document –

THE BUSINESS OF KNOWING YOUR PLACE
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/04/05/the-business-of-knowing-your-place/

Note.-

The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.

Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

Note.-

* Lawful precedes legal, and therefore the requirements of lawfulness must be met first for legality to proceed.

Of documentary peonage

Definition of Peonage

Peonage is a type of involuntary servitude

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peon

AGAIN AND AGAIN UNTIL YOU GET IT!!

The incorporation of the United States is entirely lawful. It must be understood that all countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

The participants behind the corporate instruments discussed, cannot be criticized as acting improperly when it comes to their personal affairs. Nonetheless, where they maybe open to criticism, will lie with a lack of obvious, open, fair, and clear disclosure, not made available and offered to parties who attach to any of their written instruments through their agencies directly, or attach by means of third parties.

Without full-disclosure being given, and the means closed to people to conduct their personal and private affairs without corporate interference, people become susceptible to the condition of documentary peonage, that is to say, involuntary slavery through documentation; particularly slavery brought on by the use of the bankers lie of economy to pay for artificial debts as taxes, as well as other money confiscatory schemes that confiscate property and the means through which people can make a livelihood for themselves –

“IT IS A PRIVATE BUSINESS.. THE OWNERS CAN REDIRECT ANY ASPECT OF THEIR LAW/LEGALESE OR FUNDS ANYWAY THEY PLEASE BECAUSE THEIR POLITICAL CHARTER COTUS GIVES THEM THE FREEDOM YOU SUBJECTS FANTASIZE ABOUT..”—RR

A great debt of gratitude is warranted here for the best ongoing discovery of truth on the internet by ThereIsNoDebt..

Share

Wolf Programme Had Support From The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit

Or Obviously The Wolf Programme Had Permission From The President Himself Of The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit..

Who has political authority to bypass congress on domestic issues? The issue I’m thinking about would be the wolf reintroduction program using 45-60 million of funds the federal employees and the agency USFWS apparently used to get the reintro done.. So it’s simple, they had the go ahead from a powerful member of the Clinton Administration, probably William J. Clinton himself..

Maybe under some war powers provision.. Some technicality that has been overlooked. There’s probably a signed approval someplace.. The trick is finding it. There might also be some International Treaty implications as well.. The introduction would be under the implementation of The United Nations Environmental Policies Global Biodiversity Assessment being implemented, yet guess what congress never approved that idea either.. Nor has the congress approved the Agenda 21 Programme of Action either but it is being implemented..

The wolf program is part of that environmental philosophy all of these nations agreed to at the U.N.. When they agreed to go along with the United Nations Environmental Policies.. Congress isn’t investigating this because they don’t want to, and because they don’t have the political authority to go get whoever did approve it..Because it is isn’t illegal.. These powerful people don’t owe the subjects any explanations.. And knowing how these governmental pecking order business deals go down there is a paper trail permitting this wolf programme to proceed. So keep squeaking about alleged unconstitutional actions, which are highly unlikely or get off your not interested in real researching asses and find the correct paper trail.. I bet you a president signed it..

“the process to restore wolves to Yellowstone went surprisingly smoothly. Early U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service work, combined with the vision of National Park Service (NPS) Director William Penn Mott, the quiet leadership of Yellowstone Superintendent Robert Barbee, the detailed planning of the Recovery Team, support from the Clinton administration and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, and final implementation by Edward Bangs and Steven Fritts of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with big assists from Yellowstone planners John Varley and Wayne Brewster, were the reasons for the success. Michael Finley was park superintendent when reintroduction occurred. Public support was significant, truly a ground swell of grassroots efforts from a variety of sources (The Wolf Fund and Defenders of Wildlife both at the forefront, plus many others). It is hard to imagine how such a controversial program achieved the success it did. Behind the scenes, there were many others, most notably Norman Bishop, an NPS employee who worked on his own time to educate the public about restoration and why to support it.”
https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/ys-24-1-wolf-restoration-in-yellowstone-reintroduction-to-recovery.htm

Congress Approved Wolf Reintroduction first in 1973 and second in 1982.. Via the ESA.. So perhaps Nixon is the president that approved it..Also somebody in that power structure had the political authority to authorize the use of the $45-60 million$..  Proof, no investigations no jail time nothing.. Because they made it legal. Lawyers do that, make things legal as they go..

Reintroduction Of The Grey Wolf – The Battle Over The Future Of Endangered Species Policies
http://aglawjournal.wordpress.drake.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2016/09/agVol05No2-Cook.pdf

Code Of Federal Regulations
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title50-vol2/xml/CFR-2016-title50-vol2-sec17-40.xml

Share

The United Nations Is A Privately Owned Corporation

United Nations –

“United Nations
A privately held company in New York, NY. ”

http://www.manta.com/c/mmgxyf3/united-nations

Headquarters of the United Nations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

A privately owned corporation is rewilding the lands on this landmass.. I bet that is not a good idea..

I bet they intend to make a killing on the deal…

 

Share

The Ghost Of The Deceased Roman Empire Has Arisen

The Papacy is not other than the ghost of the deceased Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the grave thereof – Thomas Hobbes, English Philosopher 1588 – 1679

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 33
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c2a1.htm
#57 This state of division into many nations is at once cosmic, social and religious. It is intended to limit the pride of fallen humanity [10] united only in its perverse ambition to forge its own unity as at Babel.[11] But, because of sin, both polytheism and the idolatry of the nation and of its rulers constantly threaten this provisional economy with the perversion of paganism.[12] -33

So orchestrate divisiveness philosophically intellectually and manually? Hahahahahaha!!!

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes/

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes-part-ii/

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes-part-iii/

~

THE RULE OF LAW
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/the-rule-of-law/

GIVING THE ZOMBIES HELL AND EUGENICS II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/giving-the-zombies-hell-and-eugenics-ii-2/

SOLUTION IS NOT IN THE INTERESTS OF THE ELITE
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/solution-is-not-in-the-interests-of-the-elite/

CARTA / CHARTER – CREATING CHAOS TO BRING WORLD WIDE ORDER
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/carta-charter-creating-chaos-to-bring-world-wide-order/

~

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-i/

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-ii/

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/11/16/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-iii/

~

EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog-act-i/

EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/25/eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog-act-ii/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iii/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT IV
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/03/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iv/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT V
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-v/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT VI
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-vi/

Living under the pillows won’t help…

Share