June 22, 2018

HISTORY Not Now Taught in Public Schools The Cover-Up of the Truth

PRELUDE

This article came from an Encyclopedia of American History used to teach school kids until 1955. Published by Harper and Row. It is 840 pages of a wealth of information. It shows the man who really discovered America . It shows all the land was called the Virginia land company In dispute with the two corporations, the East India company and the Hudson Bay company. All three companies were owned by British business corporations. Remember the American did not know at the time that the Vatican owned and controlled these British corporations and the subjects since the 1214 Treaty the King had with the Vatican ‘s Pope. However to hide this fact the King was allowed to be the front for the Vatican so as to hide this fact as the modern Mafia has corporations front for them to hide from the FBI and other agencies. So, with that background, we shall see just how far down the slippery slopes of the Corporations of the States and United States are allowed to stifle education so much so that people have no clue who they really are and no clue who controls them. I will not make any comment as it is all from the history books you present day people under 58 never have seen books in schools like this. IF I DO MAKE COMMENTS it will be in all CAPS with [[[around them]]] the bolds are from the book itself and is not by chapters but by the era of the time periods and you are referred to other pages of the book. So one is constantly going back and forth in the book.

This sets the stage for the states to operate as they do today. Basically it is to show you all states were and are corporations and not a government created by the common man and women as taught you today. That is one Myth I talk about in the MYTH and The Reality book The reason this book was eliminated from Grade 8 to grade 12, was to keep the young child’s impressionable mind closed, so no reasoning powers could develop to ask questions. Basically this is why kids graduating from schools today can read, but they have no comprehension of the words they read.

As my kids grew up in the 60?s and 70?s they did not have this teaching book as I had. In conversing with the Newspaper Guild In Washington D.C. in 1993, I asked, “What are all the newspapers printed at?” They said a stunning fifth-grade level. I asked why? They stated that to write any higher-grade level would turn away advertisers because the people could not understand a word above a fifth-grade level. I asked, “All papers?” They said no, the two papers written at a ninth-grade level are the Washington Post and the Wall Street Journal.

Now I understand it is down to a fourth-grade level. If you ever wondered why so many adults are NOT smarter than a fifth grader, it should be evident. But in all fairness to some people: The woman across the road home schools her kids. They are very smart and read some of my books and can understand them, while many a person fighting the agencies of the corporations cannot comprehend what a 15-year-old boy and a 12-year-old girl can. They, the adults, were corporation-schooled to dumb them down as said by many men and women of 55 and older. When I was in high school reading this very book, I was not educated as to who owned the United States, if all were corporations. And neither mom nor dad could explain. I was told that the Constitution was created to protect the people and was written by the people. So at the age of 16, what is a young man’s and a young girl’s thoughts on? Surely not who runs the corporations.

So the Myth that the owner of all the States and United States was never revealed to me until I reached the age of 43. I pulled out the history book, part of which you will read, then it all started to make sense and why no one could tell me who owned the corporation called State of So and So and the corporation called “The United States.” The book was pulled the year after I left high school in 1954. I graduated 52 out of a class of 170, so I was not an exceptionally smart student.

After reading again what I missed in 47 to 54, I got real smart and I hope everyone reading this will remember that everything called government is nothing but a private corporation out to make as much profit as it can at your expense. That’s what corporations do to stay alive.

Chapter 1

This starts in the book 16 pages in, with the heading , Columbus and Subsequent Exploration It is from 1451 and ends 1635. I NOW QUOTE THE BOOK

1497, 2 May-6 August 1 st Cabot Voyage.

Cabot born in Italy , real name Caboto, migrated to England 1484-90 where he lived in Bristol as a merchant Henry VII issued in 1497 to the Cabots John and his three sons, a Patent to discover for England regions to the east, west, and north( avoiding Portuguese claims). In return for a trade monopoly and custom exemptions the Cabots were to turn over to the crown 20% of all trading profits. They left England May 1497 with a crew and prominent merchants. He sighted land June 24 th and took possession of Newfoundland for Henry VII and sailed to Maine . It appears that Cabot’s company explored the coast of North America as far south as Delaware or Chesapeake Bay [[[ THIS WAS ALSO CLAIMED FOR HENRY VII]]]

1576 to 1606 English search for North west passage. Martin Frobisher sailed from England (June 1576) and pressed northwest after sighting Greenland until he reached Baffin Island and entered Frobisher Bay, believing it to be a straight between America and Asia. [[[ NOTE THEY CALLED THE COUNTRY, AMERICA ]]] To exploit his discovery the Company of Cathay was organized both for mining operations, which he conducted in Baffin Land . He returned to Bristol with 200 tons of ore. Now it tells much more than this. George Weymouth, backed by the East India Company had to turn back because of mutiny. John Knight, sponsored by both the East India company and Muscovy Cos. Explored the shores of newfound land and LABRADOR. [[[[[[ AS YOU CAN READ ALL THIS WAS DONE BY PRIVATE CORPORATIONS OF ENGLAND GIVEN PATIENTS BY HENRY VII, NOT REALIZING THEY WERE ALL CONTROLLED BY THE VATICAN AFTER APRIL 14, 1214 TREATY WAS SIGNED BY THE POPE AND KING JOHN. THIS CAN BE FOUND IN MANY OF THE INFORMER’S BOOKS AND JAMES MONTGOMERY’S RESEARCH AND IN NUMEROUS OTHER BOOKS OF HISTORY , INCLUDING THE PAPAL BULLS OF THE VATICAN ]]]

Chapter 2

The founding of the English Colonies 1578- 1732

1578-83 Virginia Sir Humphrey Gilbert , obtained a patent June 11 from Queen Elizabeth for the discovery and colonization in northwest America . But his plan to establish a colony as a base against Spain had to await financial support.

1584-1602 Raleigh’s Colony, Sir Walter Raleigh, a half-brother of Gilbert and a member of his last expedition was granted a virtual renewal of the gilbert patient Raleigh explored and called his find Virginia.

1605-1606 George Weymouth sailed under the auspices of the Earl of Southampton and the latter’s Roman Catholic son-in-law, Sir Thomas Arundel, ostensibly to establish a colony for Catholics who found their position in England insecure.

The account of Guy Fawkes arrest ( Nov. 4, 1605) narrated in James Rosier’s Relation , prompted two interrelated groups of merchants, from London and Plymouth, to petition the Crown [[[THE CROWN IS NOT THE KING, BUT THE CROWN BANK RULING THE KING AND QUEENS, FOR AN EXPLANATION ONE HAS TO READ THE BOOK THE MYTH AND THE REALITY—JUST WHO OWNS THE UNITED STATES AND JAMES MONTGOMERY’S ARTICLES]]] for a patient Under its TERMS two Virginia Companies — the London ( or South Virginia) Company and the Plymouth ( or North Virginia ) were established Company . The former was authorized to settle in a region between 34 degrees N and 41 degrees N ( present NY City); the latter45 degrees N and 38 degrees N ( present Washington, DC). [[[ YOU SEE THAT THE VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY DID NOT MEAN PRESENT VIRGINIA . IT MEANT FROM MAINE TO GEORGIA AND AS FAR WEST AS THE PA, OHIO BORDER. THIS HISTORY BOOK SHOWS THIS ON THE MAPS. CORPORATIONS RAN THE PLANTATIONS. JUST AS THE DO NOW]]]

1619-24 . Final period of company control The harsh legal code was repealed, A general assembly, comprising 22 burgesses (2 chosen by the planters from each town, hundred, or plantation.)

[[[ THE DEFINITION OF PLANTATION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH FARMING. THE DEFINITION IS GIVEN IN BURKES CONCILIATION OF THE COLONIES TO WIT ; “PLANTATIONS. – colonies, the plantings of a new society or race. The term is regularly so used in acts and charters, and has no reference whatever to cultivation of the soil.” page 81 note 12 .
[[[ERGO WE HAVE BUSINESS PEOPLE NOW RUNNING THE COMPANY THAT ARE PRIVATE COMPANIES, NOT THE HUGE COMPANIES IN ENGLAND .]]]

1624-42 Sir Francis Wyatt , who had been company governor was appointed governor by James I. He in turn was suspended by George Yeardly mar, 1626, his successor, Francis West was instructed to call the general assembly. Sir Francis Wyatt was instructed to convene the burgesses “ once a year or oftener”.

[[[ WHY DID WYATT APPEAR AFTER BEING SUSPENDED? WHO ARE THE MERCHANTS CALLED BURGESSES? DOES IT REMIND YOU OF THE SAME CORPORATE POLICIES OF TODAY?

DEFINITION OF BURGESSES 1828 WEBSTER’S (4) BEFORE THE REVOLUTION, THE REPRESENTATIVES IN THE POPULAR BRANCH OF THE LEGISLATURE OF VIRGINIA , WERE CALLED BURGESSES , AS THE HOUSE OF BURGESSES . IT IS NOW CALLED THE HOUSE OF DELEGATES. SO YOU HAVE THE MERCHANTS OF SMALL CORPORATIONS , THE POPULAR BRANCH, RUNNING THE OLD CORPORATION DESIGNED BY THE VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY BUT NOT CALLED THE VIRGINIA LAND COMPANY. WHERE IS THE COMMON MAN AND WOMEN IN THIS TIME PERIOD , LIKE YOU AND ME?]]]

1642-52 Wyatt’s successor, Sir William Berkeley, introduced a number of reforms, including the abolition of the poll tax. An Indian uprising by Opechancanough was suppressed The Indians ceded all lands between the York and the James from the falls of Kecoughton, but retained the territory north of the York Om Jan, 30, 1649 Virginia [[ THE LAND COMPANY, NOT THE VIRGINIA OF TODAY]] announced its allegiance to the Stuart House after the execution of Charles I and gave refuge to prominent cavaliers. In retaliation, Parliament passed an Act ( Oct. 1650) imposing a blockade on Virginia and subsequently dispatched two armed vessels with commissioners who received the submission of Berkeley and the council (1652) upon liberal terms. Following a new election, the burgesses chose as Governor Richard Bennett, one of the Parliamentary commissioners. Samuel Matthews, threatened to dissolve the burgesses(1658). With the death of Matthews the burgesses asserted “supreme power” until lawful authority might be forth coming from England , and elected the Royalist, Berkeley, Governor (1660). [[[ SO FAR ALL THAT IS RUNNING THE LAND COMPANY, ARE CORPORATE EXECS OF NOBILITY AND NO COMMON MAN IS ALLOWED IN THIS PRIVATE CLUB THAT ALL COLONIES ARE IN SUBMISSION AND THE MEN AND WOMEN ARE RULED BY CORPORATE DICTATES.]]]

CHAPTER 3

Settlement of New England

[[[ This part is exceptionally long so I will give the highlights only as to the corporate nature of every colony in New England ]]]
QUOTE:

Plymouth
1606-20 Early Activities of Plymouth company
1624-26 Massachusetts Bay . Dorchestor company
1628, The New England company

1629 The Cambridge Agreement. The position of the Puritans was becoming increasingly insecure after the dissolution of Parliament (1629) and the growing influence of William Laud (Bishop of London), a zealous defender of conformity. Twelve Puritan members of the Massachusetts Bay company signed the Cambridge Agreement, whereby they undertook to emigrate to America provided the charter and government were transferred thither. The company ratified the agreement (1629)

1630-34 Civil government. Was rapidly established. [[[ WHERE IS THE COMMON MAN IN ALL THIS? ALL THERE ARE, ARE CORPORATIONS , SOME PRIVATE SOME OF THE KING. THE SO CALLED “ CIVIL GOVERNMENT” IS NOTHING BUT A GOVERNMENT OF CORPORATIONS IN THE CIVIL NATURE OF THE LAW MERCHANT GOING BACK TO HAMMURABBI IN THE 1600 BC ERA THAT RULES ALL CORPORATIONS IN INTERNATIONAL LAW]]]

1635. Banishment of Roger Williams— Williams arrived in New England (1631), served in the Salem and Plymouth churches, and became pastor of the former ( early 1635) He attacked the validity of the charter, questioned the right of the civil [[[ CORPORATE]]] authorities to legislate in the matters of conscience, and urged the Salem church to separate from the rest

1635-1638. Attempts to revoke Charter – A Privy Counsel committee( “Lords Commissioners for the Plantations in General,” known as “Land Commission”) ordered the recall of the Charter on the ground it had been surreptitiously obtained and unwarranted overstepped. Georges was ordered to serve a writ of quo warranto on the Massachusetts officials, and the King’s Bench ordered the charter cancelled (1637) 1631-60 Founding of Connecticut

The Dorchester corporation and Plymouth corporation along with Edward Winslow of Plymouth explored the Connecticut Valley as far north as Windsor. On July 7, 1635 a group headed by Lord Saye and Sele, who claimed rights to settle the region on the basis of patent from the Council for New England assigned by the Earl of Warwick (1631), authorized John Winthrop , Son of the Bay Colony’s Governor, to take control at the mouth of the Connecticut River
1636-56. Rhode Island settlements.

Roger Williams established his colony at Seekonk ( Providence ), solely on the basis of an Indian deed. Roger Williams Left for England 1643 to obtain a charter which was granted him 1644. The general assembly drafted a constitutional structure establishing freedom of conscience, separating church and state, providing for town referenda on laws passed by the assembly, and giving to towns as well as the assembly to right to initiate laws.

1638-43 New Hampshire . John Wheelwright , established the Town of Exeter . His settlers signed the Exeter Compact (based on the mayflower compact). Wheelwright withdrew to Maine when Portsmouth and Dover conceded the authority to Massachusetts .
1640-51 Maine . A provincial court was established at York . Massachusetts persisted in its expansionist aims . Despite an appeal by Maine government to Parliament (1651), The Massachusetts General Court held that Maine was legally included within the boundaries of the Bay Colony.

[[[ HERE IS A CORPORATION TAKING OVER A COLONY, MUCH LIKE WHAT WE HAVE TODAY IN THIS COUNTRY. Is there anything not new under the sun?]]]

1641-60 Massachusetts as an Independent Commonwealth. Robert Child and other remonstrants attacked the Bay Colony for its civil and religious discrimination against non- Puritans and for not observing the laws of England . Winthrop and other magistrates framed a reply, and the General Court declared: “Our allegiance binds us not to the laws of England any longer than while we live in England. ”. Northern colonies with the exception of Rhode Island , whose code of 1647 adhered to the English Common law. Massachusetts , in defiance of Parliament, declared herself an Independent commonwealth [[ CORPORATION]]

New England Under the Restoration, 1660-75

Charles II Proclaimed The Restoration imperiled the position of the New England colonies.

1661-63 The Restoration threatened the independent existence of Connecticut ( which had no charter) and Rhode Island (whose charter , 1644, now had no legality. John Winthrop, jr , obtained a Royal Charter for Connecticut (1662) whose boundaries were described.

Chapter 4

Settlement of the Middle Colonies

New Netherlands [[ New York ]]

QUOTE

1610-18 Independent voyages. Following the voyage of Henry Hudson for the Dutch East India Company, several exploring and trading voyages under Dutch auspices were made to that area. The 13 ship owners engaged in trade with the new world organized the New Netherland Co. (1614)

June 3, 1621 Founding of Dutch West India Co. Under the leadership of William Usselinx, a prominent merchant, The Dutch West India Co. Was chartered by the States General, which participated in its financing The Charter conferred a trading monopoly and the right to colonize it in the new world and along the west coast of Africa 1624 First permanent settlement. 30 families sailed from Amsterdam . On arrival in New York Bay, a small group was left at a fort on Nut ( Governors) Island, several families sent to the Delaware where they established Ft. Nassau (now Gloucester, N.J.) It is conjectured, but not established, that some members of this third group settled on Manhattan Island and that mother Walloons crossed the East River to Long Island .

1629 To promote farm settlement with a view to making the colony self- sufficient as well as a supply base for the expanding merchant marine of the COMPANY both in Brazil and the West Indies, the Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions , under which the Company was empowered to grant to those transporting 50 settlers estates fronting 16 miles along navigable rivers, and extending inland as far as settlement would permit.

1638-40 The New Sweden or New South Co. was organized as successor to a series of trading companies. [[[ THIS THE PRESENT STATE OF DELAWARE . AND AGAIN ALL SETTLERS WHERE UNDER CORPORATION CONTROL AS MEMBERS OF THE “COLONY” JUST LIKE ALL AMERICANS ARE TODAY]]]

1647-63 The Dutch members of the New Sweden Co. were bought out and the company reorganized with an increase of capital and an extension of control by the Swedish crown. [[[ crown is the exchequer ( bank), not the King.]]]

1661-64 The English regarded the Dutch settlement as blocking westward expansion and interfering with the enforcement of the Navigation Acts through clandestine trade in tobacco. “The Company of Royal Adventures to Africa ” with a monopoly of the African slave trade (reincorporated as the Royal African Co., 1663: lost its monopoly1698. Charles II granted his brother, James, Duke of York , all of Maine all islands between Cape Cod and the Narrows, and all land from the western boundary of Connecticut to the eastern shore of Delaware Bay , with power to govern, subject to the reservation that judicial appeals might be taken to the crown.

1664 – 1668 Nicolls renamed New Amsterdam New York in honor of the Duke of York but permitted the Dutch municipal officers to continue to function and even to name their own successors.

New Jersey

1664 1665 The Duke of York granted to John Lord Berkeley and Sir George Carteret the region between the Hudson and Delaware Rivers . Technically, no governmental rights were conveyed, but the proprietors proceeded to issue their Concessions and Agreements, modeled on the Carolina Concessions, granting freedom of conscience, land on generous terms subject to quitrents, and the right of freeholders to send deputies to a general assembly .

1674-87 Lord Berkeley sold his proprietary rights for 1000 pounds to John Fenwick and Edward Byllinge , fellow Quakers, The province was divided 1676 between East and West Jersey by the Quintipartite Deed between Carteret, Byllinger, William Penn.
1701-38 In 1701 the Board of Trade [[BRITISH]] recommended that the crown [[ BANK OF ENGLAND , NOT THE KING]] resume control of the private colonies. In 1702 the proprietors surrendered governmental authority to the crown.
THE COLONIES AND THE EMPIRE 1624-1775

May 16,1624 Revocation of Virginia Co Charter , making Virginia a Royal colony.
1643-59 Parliamentary Commission for Plantations

[[[ THIS MEANS ALL COLONIES CORPORATE, FROM MAINE TO GEORGIA WERE REVOKED BY THE KING AND THE KING NOW , WORKING FOR THE VATICAN MIND YOU VIA TREATY OF APRIL 14 1214 , NOW IS IN CONTROL OF ALL THE CORPORATE COLONIES]]]

1649 With the plantations virtually inactive all their functions were assumed by the Council of State, which set up a standing committee to handle trade . The King in council appointed a Committee for Trade and Plantations of the Privy Council

[[[ IF ONE READS WHAT WAS FOUND IN NORTH CAROLINA IN 1996, YOU TOO WILL SEE THE SAME OLD COUNCIL OF STATE OPERATION. IN FACT IF YOU GO TO YOUR SECRETARY OF STATE, YOU CAN GET THE ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE. PROVING THE VATICAN CONTROLS ALL CORPORATE STATES AND UNITED STATES THE SAME WAY. YOU WILL NOT FIND MENTION OF THE VATICAN AT ALL IN ANY HISTORY BOOKS IN THS COUNTRY], FOR THE SIMPLE REASON IT DOES NOT WANT IT KNOWN IT IS PULLING THE STRINGS TO ACHIEVE IT’S GOAL OF WORLD DOMINATION. IT OPERATES THRU COUNTRIES AND CORPORATIONS AS SHOWN IN ITS ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE, I PUT IN THE MYTH AND REALITY BOOK]]]

1696-1782 The Board of Trade , commissioned by William III, comprised 15 members (7 high officials including Privy Councilors, 8 paid members, including a First Lord of Trade, president of the Board), was empowered to supervise (1) trade and the fisheries, (2) care of the poor,(3) plantation affairs, (4) recommend appointments of colonial officials, and (5) review colonial legislation and report to the Privy Council.

1673-76 The Treasury Board’s colonial functions were greatly expanded as a result of the Navigation Laws ( particularly the act of 1673).

1697 Establishment of Vice Admiralty Courts . Under the Navigation Act of 1696 the Privy Council directed the Board of Trade to establish vice -admiralty courts in the colonies, acting under the governors of New York , Massachusetts , Maryland , Pennsylvania , and Virginia designated judges and other officers of such courts. [[[ WE HAVE THE SAME COURT SYSTEM NOW AS THEN, DESPITE WHAT OTHER PEOPLE SAY. IT’S ALL IN THE 1789 FIRST JUDICIARY ACT, SECTION 34 AND IN MANY LEGAL BOOKS SUCH AS PROFESSOR BENEDICT’S ADMIRALTY LAW PUBLISHED BY MATTHEW P BENDER , 7 TH EDITION. IT IS ALSO WRITTEN BY CHARLES WARREN IN HIS TREATISE, THE HISTORY OF THE AMERICAN BAR PRINTED 1966, LIBRARY OF CONGRESS # 66-24357]]]

[[[ THERE WERE MANY WARS WITHIN THE COLONIES THAT WOULD TAKE UP TOO MUCH SPACE BUT THEY ARE JUST QUOTED BELOW BY NAMES ]]]

1632-70 New France to King Williams War
1689 King William’s War (War of the League of Augsburg)
1702 Queen Anne’s War
1739-42 War of Jenkins’ Ear
1740-48 King George’s War
1754 The French and Indian War ( Seven Years War)

ERA OF THE AMERICAN REVOLUTION

1784 state constitutions . During the revolution 11 of the 13 states drew up new constitutions. (R.I. and Conn. Continued to use the colonial charters of 1662 and 1663, merely deleting all references to the British Crown.) [[ CROWN MEANING THE KING AS IT WAS CAPITALIZED. OTHER REFERENCES OF CROWN NOT CAPITALIZED MEANS THE BANKERS ( EXCHEQUER) THIS IS WHAT IS CRITICAL IN ANY WRITING, GRAMMAR AND PUNCTUATION TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IS REALLY BEING SAID.]]

These new constitutions were the work of revolutionary congresses or conventions. Constitutions where adopted by N.H,. N.J., Pa. , Del. , Md. , Va. ,N.C., and S.C. in 1776; by N.Y. and Ga. In 1977

[[[ PLEASE NOTE: AGAIN GRAMMAR COMES INTO PLAY, IN THAT CONGRESS NOT CAPITALIZED ABOVE DOES NOT MEAN THE US CONGRESS, BUT JUST A BUNCH OF MEN (CONGRESS) OR CONVENTION OF MEN, GOT TOGETHER UNKNOWN TO THE COLONIES AND DRAFTED A CONSTITUTION, THEN THE STATES, JUST LIKE THE UNITED STATES CONGRESS DID, ADOPTED SOMETHING THAT WAS NOT THEIRS. THE WORD adopt IS FOUND TO BE SOMETHING NOT YOURS BUT THAT YOU ADOPTED IT AS IF IT WAS YOURS. THAT IS THE MYTHS ALL AMERICANS FELL FOR BELIEVING THEY ( THE COMMON MAN) WROTE ALL CONSTITUTIONS WHEN THEY DID NO SUCH THING.]]]

[[[HERE IS WHAT THE AMERICAN NEVER WILL GRASP. THAT IS IN THIS ENCYCLOPEDIA OF AMERICANHISTORY]]]

Quoting again the book.

1789, First Presidential Election

First Congress under the Constitution met in New York without a quorum (8 Senators and 13 representatives)

House of Representatives organized with 30 of its 59 members present Executive Departments. The first executive department created under the new government was that of Foreign Affairs Established 27 July, it was officially redesignated ( 15 Sept) Department of State.

1791 First Bank of the U.S. 1790, Hamilton submitted to the house his report on a national bank. Washington requested members of his cabinet [[[THIS CABINET IS NOTHING OTHER THAN THE COUNCIL OF STATE UNDER THE KING’S CORPORATION LAW]]] to submit written opinions on the constitutionality of the measure . Jefferson ‘s opinion (15 Feb.) Maintaining that the bill was unconstitutional advanced the doctrine commonly known as” strict constructionist.” Jefferson took as his main ground the 10 th Amendment ( not yet adopted). The incorporation of the bank, he argued, was not among the powers specifically delegated to Congress. Hamilton ‘s opinion (23 Feb.) Elaborated the powers of “ implied powers” ( the so called “ loose constructionist” view of the Constitution. He contended that the proposed bank was related to the Congressional power to collect taxes and regulate trade.

[[[ THIS IS AS LAME AN EXCUSE AS ANY WHEN YOU REALLY THINK ABOUT IT. FOR IF IT WAS THAT IMPORTANT TO SIMPLY COLLECT TAXES, WHAT ON EARTH DOES A BANK HAVE TO DO WITH THE ACT OF TAX COLLECTION? YOU HAVE A DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY TO STORE ALL THE TAXES. AND WHAT ABOUT TRADE? WHAT ON EARTH DOES A BANK HAVE TO DO WITH TRADE? THERE WAS MORE TO IT THAN THAT LITTLE CHARADE. MUCH MORE. YOU CAN READ IT IN THIS ARTICLE ON ATGPRESS HTTP://WWW.ATGPRESS.COM/INFORM/WEP002.HTM.]]]

3 mar. 1791 Hamilton ‘s 2 nd report recommended an excise tax on manufacture of distilled spirits..

[[[ EVERY THING WE HAVE TO DAY WAS THE CAUSE OF HAMILTON WHO WAS IN THE EXECUTIVE, WHICH WAS FOREIGN AFFAIRS ONLY AS YOU HAVE READ. HE WAS BRINGING IN ALL FOREIGN CONCERNS TO RULE THIS COUNTRY AND CAUSED A FEUD BETWEEN HAMILTON AND JEFFERSON AND ENDED IN A DUEL WHEN AARON BURR KILLED HAMILTON , BUT THE DAMAGE WAS ALREADY DONE. TO SEE WHY HAMILTON DID WHAT HE DID, READ THIS HTTP://WWW.ATGPRESS.COM/INFORM/BA038.HTM]]]

End of quoting the Encyclopedia of American history

There are much, much more in this book so I cut it short. The idea was to show present day Americans, all that went on in this country that the men and women that came here to settle plantations were hobbled with corporateness and every city town and village was nothing but a traders corporation. Then, when the 1776 war started the corporations of colonies were all a confederation that broke away from the British Rule but were still owned by that treaty of April 1214 when the King signed his entire empire you just read about, over to the Vatican . So the 1776 war did nothing to free the colonies or Americans as they were pledged to the Vatican in April of 1214.

The King was nothing but a front man for the corporation of the Vatican and allowed to operate free as he wanted. Just as happened in 1664 to 1668 above in the book. Who actually owns what John Cabot found in the beginning of this book article. The Book was a school text book and The Consultant Editors were the who’s Who of History Professors And then was edited by Richard B Morris Professor of History of Columbia University. This book cannot be found anywhere, Because the Publishers were bought out by the Black Popes operatives in this country so it was eliminated. So in the long run the Americans are still controlled by the Vatican . And the crowns you read about in the book were not the Kings unless specifically named, they were the Bankers ( Exchequers) of Europe that controlled all as they do in America .

In a point of fact, all the owners of the federal Reserve are the Exchequers and are the foreign controlled elite of the Vatican . The same ones, not the same persons that were the First Bank of the United States . Maybe you missed it, but if you reread the article where this is a country named America not the United States . To most Americans they believe the country is United States . Then why, of all reason are you called an American and not a United Statesman or something leaving America out? Think a little. If you know the definition of the word “OF” you will know just what the phrase “The United States OF America” is saying. When the corporate colonies became States they retained their corporate character .

But of course the men and women at that time was kept in the dark that they were owned by the Vatican and no longer were British subjects and the Vatican proceeded to take over the States, which all were his to begin with, and created the Corporation of the United States. My book the Myth and the Reality tells how the Vatican did this recapturing of his possessions and why we never won the war against The British. We fought the front man for the owner that’s all. We won the battle and not the entire war. That is a religious war still ongoing between the Lord and Satan. The Vatican ‘s organizational Structure I included in my book shows Lucifer as top boss of the Vatican ‘s both Black and white Popes. They alone created the Religion of ISLAM for a Distinct purpose. That is now coming to fruition after all these centauries. The Vatican looks 200 to 500 years in the future. Do you look that far in even 1/1`0th that time into the future so your offspring’s offspring will have it better?

What were the names, founding dates, and connections to the King of England by the original 13 colonies?

[SOURCE: World Book Encyclopedia (WBE)]

ANSWER:
1067-Virginia – Charter by King to the Virginia Company of London
1620-Massachusetts – Charter granted by the King to the Puritans
1623- New Hampshire – King appointed Council of New England for settlement
1624- New York – Charter by King to Duke of York
1622-Connecticut – Charter by King to John Winthrop
1634-Maryland – Charter by King to Lord Baltimore
1636-Rhode Island – King granted “Charter of Rhode Island & Providence Plantations”
1638-Delaware – Charter by King to Duke of York
1643-Pennsylvania – Grant by King to William Penn
1653-North Carolina – Grant by King to Sir Robert Heath
1660-New Jersey – Grant by King to Duke of York
1670-South Carolina – Grant by King to Eight “Lords Proprietors”
1733-Georgia – Grant by King to a Corporation entitled: “Trustees for Establishing the Colony of Georgia in America

END QUOTE

And who sits in the back ground like the Wizard of Oz hiding behind A front, Pulling the chains even tighter and calling himself a Vicar of Christ, when his own structure shows Lucifer at the top of the heap pulling your chains also as a member of his private corporation? That’s why no one is a follower of the Lord any more, they follow the dictates of Lucifer’s Minions. As the Lord said. if you believe in scriptures altered by the Vatican so many times, And I emphasize part of it that no one quotes it all ; “My people are destroyed for lack of knowledge: because thou hast refused knowledge, I will also refuse thee that thou shall be no Priest to me: and seeing thou hast forgotten the Law of thy God, I will also forget thy children .” Hosea 4:6 If that be the case then one cannot sit on a fence,. I generally don’t quote scriptures but for those that do this ought to hit home for all that clam Corporate State of US citizenship. And claim to be a Christian.

Hosea 8:1 & 4… “they have transgressed my covenant, and trespassed against my Law (the Law of the spirit of life in Christ Jesus).” Hosea 8:1b (with Romans 8:2 in parentheses added); and,

“They have set up kings, but not by me: they have made princes, and I knew it not:…” Hosea 8:4a “And I heard another voice from heaven say: Go out of her, my people, that ye be not partakers of her sins, and that ye receive not of her plagues: . . .” Revelations 18:4

“Then Peter and the Apostles answered, and said, ‘We ought rather to obey God than men.’” Acts, 5:29.

And even these Courts Recognize, even they are not above The Lords law that I have quoted many a time falling on deaf ears .

Now all acts of legislature apparently contrary to natural right and justice, are, in our laws, and must be in the nature of things, considered as void. The laws of nature are the laws of God; whose authority can be superseded by no power on earth.

A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to him from whose punishments they cannot protect us. All human constitutions which contradict his laws, we are in conscience bound to disobey. Such have been the adjudications of our courts of justice. Robin v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson 109, 114, 1 Va. Reports Ann. 58, 61 (1772) aff’d. Gregory v. Baugh, 29 Va. 681, 29 Va. Rep. Ann. 466, 2 Leigh 665 (1831) And cited 8 Co. 118. a. Bonham’s case. Hob. 87; 7. Co. 14. a. Calvin’s case

Many have ignored these historical truths, to their standing with the Lord. That’s all self-evident. Those that want to believe in Myths rather than truth, well, tell it to the Lord if you ever meet him.

The Informer September 2010

Share

G.W. Bush And The Fake News Problems In The U.S.

The lions share of the “News” is propaganda. This has been a problem for a very long time.

Bullshit Sells.. Some are catching on to this old “conspiracy theory” aye…

 

Share

Fake News To The Left Of Me Fake News To The Right

David Rockefeller wrote a book entitled “Memoirs” in which he admits secretly conspiring for the creation and implementation of a world government and the use of fake news to get it…And the best part is they can conspire to make it legal while lying to you.. That’s right, lying to you is legal.. I always get a giggle out of that word conspire.. You can conspire to be nice or evil.. To conspire is to breath.. I guess nobody is breathing in the world around us.. I must be a breathing theorist.. Lol.. You’re one of those breathing theorists…

“Some even believe we [Rockefeller family] are part of a secret cabal working against the best interests of the United States, characterizing my family and me as ‘internationalists’ and of conspiring with others around the world to build a more integrated global political and economic structure – One World, if you will. If that’s the charge, I stand guilty, and I am proud of it.”—David Rockefeller

Rockefeller further reveals the journalistic organizations whose mission it is to engage in the furtherance of fake news.

Decades of fake news;

“I am grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time Magazine and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promises of discretion.”—David Rockefeller

Thank you for the fake news;

“We are grateful. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But, the work is now much more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a World Government. The supranational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries”—David Rockefeller to Trilateral Commission in 1991

Hear I am Stuck In The Middle Of It All…

Share

The Putin-Trump Sustainable Development Path Towards World Peace?

“We are ready to do everything to bring back Russian-US relations on a sustainable development path. This would benefit both the Russian and the US people and would positively impact the overall climate in global affairs, given the particular responsibilities of Russia and the US in maintaining global stability and security,” Putin said.
Source:
President Vladimir Putin received credentials from ambassadors to Russia and commented on the results of the US presidential election
http://www.sputniknews.com/politics/201611091047237528-putin-trump-victory/

Trump of course will follow the wishes of the Global elites insistence that Sustainable Development is fully implemented. That of course is the ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER. The UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment. The Programme of Action on Sustainable Development signed in Rio 1992.. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, The Global Revolution was written in 1968, The Rio Agreement was written in 92, the Global Biodiversity Assessment was written in 1995.  But insufficient progress has been made in population reduction. I have all of these books here I have read them multiple times and fully understand their intent.

Did you Trump voters believe this all would go away? Really?

Apparently I love your children more than you do!

 

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

The way to see that this is happening to you right now, follows the reading –

To: IAHF List
Subject: Cobden Club Memo Circulated at ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER: More Evidence of Genocide Agenda:
From: John Hammell jham@iahf.com
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 1999 22:30:02 -0400
http://www.trufax.org/reports/cobden.html
GWS Explanation Return to Biological Manipulation Menu

CONFIDENTIAL
COBDEN CLUBS
Secretariat for World Order
814-631-9959

September 20, 1991

INITIATIVE FOR ECO-92 EARTH CHARTER

1. THE PRESSING NEED

a. The time is pressing. The Club of Rome was founded in 1968, Limits to Growth was written in 1971, Global 2000 was written in 1979, but insufficient progress has been made in population reduction.

b. Given global instabilities, including those in the former Soviet bloc, the need for firm control of world technology, weaponry, and natural resources, is now absolutely mandatory. The immediate reduction of world population, according to the mid-1970’s recommendation of the Draper Fund, must be immediately affected.

c. The present vast overpopulation, now far beyond the world carrying capacity, cannot be answered by future reductions in the birth rate due to contraception, sterilization and abortion, but must be met in the present by the reduction of numbers presently existing. This must be done by whatever means necessary.

d. The issue is falsely debated between a political and a cultural approach to population and resources, when in fact, faced with stubborn obstruction and day-to-day political expediency which make most of the leaders of the most populous poor countries unreliable, the issue is compulsory cooperation.

e. Compulsory cooperation is not debatable with 166 nations, most of whose leaders are irresolute, conditioned by localist “cultures,” and lacking appropriate notions of the New World Order. Debate means delay and forfeiture of our goals and purpose.

CONFIDENTIAL

f. The U.N. action against Iraq proves conclusively that resolute action on our part can sway other leaders to go along with the necessary program. The Iraq action proves that the aura of power can be projected and sustained and that the wave of history is sweeping forward.

2. PERILS TO BE HEEDED

There is a two-fold opposition which must be eliminated by quick action. There are rumblings among some of the “South” regions, notably Brazil and Malaysia, to thwart the aims of the UNCED Earth Charter and to thwart the international gathering in Brazil in June 1992. There is also the unfortunate vacillation in our own ranks, an argument that the

UNCED leaders have made the agenda “too political” and that the way must first be prepared on a less abrasive cultural basis. We present only the most recent evidence:

* Gilberto Melio Mourao, the Brazilian writer, warned in the August 4 Folha de Sao Paulo that in Munich in 1938, “it won’t against the current type of ecological epidemic, unleashed against our country, which threatens the structure of our cultural, spiritual and political values, and against our very national sovereignty …. Messrs. Chamberlain and Daladier, heads of the governments of England and France, calmly offered the Brazilian Amazon to the Fuehrer.” Hitler reportedly observed that since the Amazon was in South American, the United States would cite the Monroe Doctrine and reject a German occupation of Brazilian territory. Chamberlain and Daladier responded that the proposal had Washington’s backing.

* The U.N. Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) issued its annual report September 16th, declaring, according to BBC, that the liberal free market is not an appropriate model for developing nations. Finance should serve industry, not the other way around, and government has a key role to play in certain sectors of the economy.

3. WHAT THE WORLDWIDE FUND FOR NATURE IS SAYING

* An official of the World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) said September 10th that the Geneva UNCED results were “absolutely a serious setback.” There will be no convention on forests by June 1992 for Brazil. The situation has reached a deadlock. This is the first casualty for the UNCED process.

* A senior advisor on ecological affairs to Britain’s Prince Philip said September 15th that Eco-92 organizer Maurice Strong had “over politicized” the issue of environmentalism and had raised “ridiculously messianic expectations.”

CONFIDENTIAL

THEREFORE THE FOLLOWING POLICY MUST BE IMPLEMENTED:

A. The Security Council of the U.N. led by the Anglo-Saxon Major Nation Powers, will decree that henceforth, the Security Council will inform all nations that its suffrance on population has ended, that all nations have quotas for population reduction on a yearly basis, which will be enforced by the Security Council by selective or total embargo of credit, items of trade including food and medicine, or by military force, when required.

B. The Security Council of the U.N. will inform all nations that outmoded notions of national sovereignty will be discarded and that the Security Council has complete legal, military and econonomic jurisdiction in any region in the world and that this will be enforced by the Major Nations of the Security Council.

C. The Security Council of the U.N. will take possession of all natural resources, including the watersheds and great forests, to be used and preserved for the good of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

D. The Security Council of the U.N. will explain that not all races and peoples ara equal, nor should they be. Those races proven superior by superior achievements ought to rule the lesser races, caring for them on suffrance that they cooperate with the Security Council. Decision making, including banking, trade, currency rates and economic development plans, will be made in stewardship by the Major Nations.

E. All of the above constitute the New World Order, in which Order, all nations, regions, and races will cooperate with the decisions of the Major Nations of the Security Council.

The purpose of this document is to demonstrate that action delayed could well be fatal. All could be lost if mere opposition by minor races is tolerated and the unfortunate vacillations of our closest comrades is cause for our hesitations. Open declaration of intent followed by decisive force is the final solution. This must be done before any shock hits our financial markets, tarnishing our credibility and perhaps diminishing our force.

– – – –

END OF DOCUMENT

“The above document was passed out at the ECO meeting, and we eventually received a copy after almost two years had transpired. We feel that the above document provides sufficient information as to the design of the NWO relative to world population. The telephone number was attempted and found to be associated with Senator Gephardt.”

Everyone of you who advocate against the pseudo environmentalism movement, anti hunting, anti wolf management who voted for Trump voted against yourselves. Not only have you betrayed yourselves you have betrayed those of us who warned you about these things. You voted for the continuation of depopulation Eugenics via Sustainable Development.

With the presidential elections finally over, a question is being asked with increasing frequency: Who did you vote for? Personally, this question aggravates me because it is framed within a distinctly Hegelian framework. This framework consists of the confining dialectics of left vs. right, leftist “liberal” vs. Leftist “conservative”, and, of course, Democrat vs. Republican. The latter of these dialectics is, for me, the most frustrating because there’s no real difference between Republicans and Democrats. None.. Both parties are a philosophical combination of Marxism, Nietzscheanism which is Communitarianism. They keep trading off on the lead role while nothing ever changes except their profit margins. The Party of Prosperity, their own profit benefits greatly from the division they manage while the Corporate Cartel controlling governmental infrastructure keeps sucking the wealth of the earth into their own back pockets, while blocking us little people from those resources.

{There is NO conservative right anything in this country}

“The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and policies, one, perhaps of the Right and the other of the Left, is a foolish idea. Instead the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ at any election without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy…It should be able to replace it, every four years if necessary, by the other party, which … will still pursue with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”—Carroll Quigley – Tragedy And Hope – 1966..

Been around since 1966. And amazingly most followers of the left versus right Hegelian charade still don’t get it..

The purpose of a two party system is the maintenance of a political cartel. Within such a framework, viable alternatives are overlooked and the same logically bankrupt status quo remains enshrined.

Have a nice day!

Much thanks goes out to There Is No Debt..

 

MY VOTE IS FOR LIFE NOT DEATH! ALL SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT BRINGS US IS DEATH..

 

Share

Does The U.N. Love You?

From the United Nations Global Biodiversity Assessment (Heywood 1995) by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), Cambridge University Press: Cambridge 1995, calling for urgent action to reverse the effects of unsustainable human activities on global biodiversity. A sample list of acitivities that are to be eradicated and as a consequence, particularly with the dramatic reversal of farming (food production), it will mean the eradication of people on a massive scale –

UN GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY ASSESSMENT – UNSUSTAINABLES
http://www.freedomadvocates.org/download/research/Unsustainables_UN_Global_Bio_Div_Assess_95_Pages.pdf

We read from the subtitle heading, ‘The underlying causes’ –

The primary causes underlying the loss of biodiversity are demographic

Source:

Genesis of Eden
Global Biodiversity Assessment Summary for Policy-Makers
http://www.dhushara.com/book/globio/ass.htm

Overpopulation Is A Myth
https://overpopulationisamyth.com/

United Nations System-Wide Earthwatch
Biodiversity Assessment
http://www.un.org/earthwatch/biodiversity/assessment.html

 

United Nations Environment Programme
Division of Early Warning and Assessment
Biodiversity
http://www.unep.org/dewa/Assessments/Biodiversity/tabid/7001/Default.aspx

United Nations Sustainable Development Agenda 21
http://www.cuttingthroughthematrix.com/articles/Agenda21.pdf

United Nations Environment Programme
World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC)
Proteus
https://www.unep-wcmc.org/featured-projects/proteus-partnership

United Nations Environment Programme – World Conservation Monitoring Centre (WCMC
About Us
https://www.unep-wcmc.org/about-us

The UN Doesn’t Love You

51y-pzzt1hl-_sx353_bo1204203200_

The destruction of food production, jobs, industry, economies, orchestrated or even coincidental for our coincidence theorists friends for the salvation of wildlife and ecosystems can only mean depopulation of mankind..

The Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy mentioned in the below quote are the Vatican-The Holy See, The Holy Roman Empire- The Holy Trinity.. The Pope, The Queen of England and their Banking Cartel and the various societies in their service working towards depopulation of mankind..

“Once it is clearly seen and understood that politicians are mere excutive representative-agent employees of the owners of private corporate countries, then the ‘fear based theatrical staging’ towards Chaos and Depopulating War to catalyse and elicit a reponse from the people of the world in agreeing to and accepting, A Sustainable Development ‘Green’ Order of Enslavement, by way of, A loss of freedoms and its accompanying obedience to Safeguard Security & Freedoms, then we have the ensuing conclusive end of these collabarative events, exposed as mere managed preplanned operations that politicians as willing followers and serving representive-agents of the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy, are bringing about as instructed.”—There is No Debt

Share

Oaths Of U.S. Public Office

Oaths Of U.S. Public Office

When we consider what is being said here, we must consider how we have been treated in this society. as subjects rather than joint owners of the U.S. corporation. As citizens not as sovereigns. Know them by their fruits..What are they teaching versus what they are actually doing..

OATHS OF OFFICE

There is much debate on oaths of office of government officials flying around and people have no idea what they are talking about so I decided to let you in on some research and common logical understanding. Almost 100 percent of the people believe the government people should take the oaths and if they don’t then when they come after people, like you and me , Mr. and Mrs. John Q .. They have no authority to come after you, you say. What I would like to make certain is that the oath taken to the letter of the law is what they are following when they “come after you.” People do not realize that when the oath is cited it is cited for a contract called a constitution of the corporation known as either the State or the United States. It is not taken of, by, or for the people of the country. To prove that states and counties are corporations is found in the North Carolina Library cite on the internet at http://statelibrary.dcr.state.nc.us/NC/CNTYOUT/PRECOUNT.HTM#POLITIC In there is this excerpt and applies to every state in the union.

The County as a Body Politic and Corporate

A county, as a defined geographic subdivision of the state, serves many purposes. Churches, civic clubs, and other societal institutions use counties as convenient subdivisions for their own purposes. The business world may assign sales territories and franchises to areas composed of one or more counties. The county may play a role in the psychology of people born and raised “in the country” – it serves to establish where they are from and who they are, thus becoming a part of their personal identity. But the county was created in the first instance by the state as a political unit, and this remains its primary purpose.

More than forty years ago, the North Carolina Supreme Court was called upon to define a county from a legal point of view. (In the case, Wake County was a litigant and the court spoke in terms of that county, but what the Court had to say is equally true of the other ninety-nine counties):

“Wake County is a body politic and corporate, created by the General Assembly of North Carolina for certain public and political purposes. Its powers as such, both express and implied, are conferred by statutes, enacted from time to time by the General Assembly, and are exercised by its Board of Commissioners …. In the exercise of ordinary government functions, [counties] are simply agencies of the State, constituted for the convenience of local administration in certain portions of the State’s territory, and in the exercise of such functions they are subject to almost unlimited legislative control, except when the power is restricted by constitutional provisions.”

The language used by the court is important as it established the definition of a county. A county, according to the court, is a “body politic and corporate.” A body politic is a civil division of the state for purposes of governmental administration. A body corporate is a legal entity. In private law, a corporation is a legal person. A county is a legal entity or corporation of a special sort and with a public function. As such, it can buy and hold property, sue and be sued, and enter into contracts – all functions necessary to make its work as a body politic effective.

In O’Berry, State Treasurer v. Mecklenburg County, [198 N.C. 357,151 S.E. 880 ( 1930)], the court stated that “the weight of authority is to effect that all the powers and functions of a county bear reference to the general policy of the State, and are in fact an integral portion of the general administration of State policy. Historically, the primary purpose for erecting a county was to serve state purposes and to perform state functions in a given area rather than to serve the purposes of a particular geographic community. (By way of contrast, a city was primarily formed at the request of the people within its jurisdiction to serve the needs of the inhabitants.)

For the Supreme Court to say that “all the powers and functions of a county bear reference to the general policy of the State and are in fact an integral portion of the general administration of State policy” is not as restrictive as might at first reading appear. “State policy” is a very broad frame of reference; it can touch any aspect of local government. Thus, the truly significant nugget in the Supreme Court’s definition of the role of counties is its statement that in the exercise of their functions, counties “are subject to almost unlimited legislative control, except when the power is restricted by constitutional provisions.” In effect, if the General Assembly can be persuaded to assign counties any given power or responsibility, and, if the Constitution does not prohibit it, that assignment becomes state policy for county administration.

Now that you have irrefutable proof that you , when calling yourself a “state citizen” are an integral part of a corporate body and you yourself take on the character of a legal entity called a “person”. All statutes are private corporate law and they all address a “person” and not a man. The common law of God would address a man and that’s why there is no common law anymore when dealing with statutes which are all corporate in nature. Now you know why they refer to you as person. This I had explained on the articles on atgpress.com and in my book, The New History of America , and in Which One Are You published back in 1990. In fact I include here one small portion of Which One Are You here to show even back then I was on point.

What was the American before he “resided” in a State? Wasn’t he a “free white person?” See Works of John Adams, 213 and Thayer, Cases on Constitutional Law,note on page 459, stated in part:

“The proper english meaning of the term `citizen’ imported membership of a borough or local municipal corporation. The usual word for a man’s political relation to the monarch of the state was `subject’. . . . The word `citizen’ is not found in any of our state constitutions before that of Massachusetts (1780); . . . In the Declaration of Independence (1776), we read it once, `He has restrained our fellow citizens,’ etc. and once in the Articles of Confederation.”

Yet no one will take the time to understand what I had written was all documented and then proceed to engage in arguments with each other that go nowhere except on a merry- go- round. So, both the State government and the United States government are corporate entities of the Crown/Vatican cabal and the people you call criminals are just obeying the contract set upon them when they took office. With that in mind we go to oaths.

The oath thus states in part; I, ……… do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support, obey, and defend the Constitution …

Now we go to the paper called the Constitution of the United States. The two main parts that this oath apply are Article VI and the 14th Amendment Paragraph three. Remember that the oath is to a contract that they have to abide by and nothing else. You are not involved nor mentioned in the oath and with good reason. So let’s see what they are abiding with.

First is the oath to Article VI.

United States Article VI protects the debt owed to the creditor King by each debtor colony. It protects the treaties the Colonies had with the King and proves the works of James Montgomery that we are still under the control of the King by treaty.

Article VI, U.S. Constitution. 1. All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid as against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. [The King’s money and debt is protected and this is their solemn oath they take.]

2. This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made [the treaty of 1606 and 1782 made with the King], or which shall be made [Jay’s treaty of 1792 with the King], under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; [despite anything to the contrary Treaties are part of the Constitution and reign supreme over all you people despite the fact you have nothing to do with it. You said it’s your constitution, live with it and don’t complain]; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.”

To prove these treaties are the “Law of the Land” here is what the HAMILTON v. EATON, 1 N.C. 641 (1796), HAMILTON v. EATON. 2 Mart., 1. U.S. Circuit Court. (June Term, 1796.), had to say.

“Headnote 5. Besides, the treaty of 1783 was declared by an Act of Assembly of this State passed in 1787, to be law in this State, and this State by adopting the Constitution of the United States in 1789, declared the treaty to be the supreme law of the land. The treaty now under consideration was made, on the part of the United States, by a Congress composed of deputies from each state, to whom were delegated by the articles of confederation, expressly, “the sole and exclusive right and power of entering into treaties and alliances”; and being ratified and made by them, it became a complete national act, and the act and law of every state.

If, however, a subsequent sanction of this State was at all necessary to make the treaty law here, it has been had and repeated. By a statute passed in 1787, the treaty was declared to be law in this State, and the courts of law and equity were enjoined to govern their decisions accordingly. And in 1789 was adopted here the present Constitution of the United States, which declared that all treaties made, or which should be made under the authority of the United States, should be the supreme law of the land; and that the judges in every state should be bound thereby; anything in the Constitution or laws of any state to the contrary not withstanding. Surely, then, the treaty is now law in this State, and the confiscation act, so far as the treaty interferes with it, is annulled.”

Evidence what was stated by the same court; that those that join the State are “SUBJECTS” not sovereigns:

“By an act of the Legislature of North Carolina, passed in April, 1777, it was, among other things, enacted, “That all persons, being subjects of this State, and now living therein, or who shall hereafter come to live therein, who have traded immediately to Great Britain or Ireland, within ten years last past, in their own right, or acted as factors, storekeepers, or agents here, or in any of the United States of America, for merchants residing in Great Britain or Ireland, shall take an oath of abjuration and allegiance, or depart out of the State.”

Well I told you that the masses just traded kings and are now “citizens” (slaves) of a State rather than the King of England. The Declaration took you out from under the King but left the people worse off, because they became the credit of the State to pay the King’s money that the people were indebted to in the first place. This is an excerpt from my book The New History of America

Now that you know what the paramount reason for the US Constitution was, how can we say the government officials are shrugging their oath and not obeying it? They are very much in conformance to that oath that they defend the Crowns property and to make sure that treaties before 1787 and immediately after it, like they knew Jay’s treaty of 1791 was to be consummated, were adhered to. You cannot say no to this. So lets go to the 14th Amendment and see if they are following their oaths to obey and defend the contract of the corporations (state and federal).

But before we do we must set the stage for the reason the judges are only following their oath to the contract, which is in no way directed to you as you are not a party to the contract and never were. I will get to the Bill of Rights later.

Bouviers Law Dictionary defines Insurgent as, “One who is concerned in an insurrection. He differs from a rebel in this, that rebel is always understood in a bad sense, or one who unjustly opposes the constituted authorities; insurgent may be one who justly opposes the tyranny of constituted authorities. The colonists who opposed the tyranny of the English government were insurgents, not rebels.”

As a side note , the 1933 trading with the enemy Act did not, I repeat, DID NOT make you the enemy of the United States despite what anyone says or writes about it. What it did was make you the enemy of the banks and that’s why the banks were closed for 6 days so the President could issue them licenses to deal with the enemy, A.K.A. the American people. Your ancestors were already the enemy starting 1863, therefore, you too are the enemy and there is nothing you can do about that unless you want to declare war against this government who is the conqueror. We are a people under conquest and if you have not read up on conquest I suggest you do so, soon. James Montgomery is the expert on this and has written extensively about it.

Now we go to Article 149 of the Lieber Code or General Order 100 of President Lincoln, who, prior to this, through 12 Stat 319, made you the enemy of the “State”. That 1863 statute was never repealed and exists in Title 50 Sections 212, 213 and 215 as well as in Title 28 sections 2461 to 2465 seizure. If you do not believe me go and pull those Title 50 sections and go to the source law. Also note what Title 50 is named. So they still, unbeknownst to you, operate under this General Order 100. This is the part that they use against us today because remember, WE ARE STILL THE ENEMY INSURGENTS when attacking any laws of government. Read carefully.

The Lieber Code of 1863

CORRESPONDENCE, ORDERS, REPORTS, AND RETURNS OF THE
UNION AUTHORITIES
FROM JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1863.
–#7 O.R.–SERIES III–VOLUME III [S# 124]

GENERAL ORDERS No. 100.
WAR DEPT., ADJT. GENERAL’S OFFICE,
Washington, April 24, 1863.

The following “Instructions for the Government of Armies of the United States in the Field,” prepared by Francis Lieber, LL.D., and revised by a board of officers, of which Maj. Gen. E. A. Hitchcock is president, having been approved by the President of the United States, he commands that they be published for the information of all concerned.

SECTION X.–Insurrection– Civil war–Rebellion.

149. Insurrection is the rising of people in arms against their government, or portion of it, or against one or more of its laws, or against an officer or officers of the government. It may be confined to mere armed resistance, or it may have greater ends in views.

Now, “when we go against one or more of its laws”, and that is the income tax laws, the Registration laws, the Driver license laws or any one of the multitude of laws they make, we are in insurrection because we are, remember, the enemy. When we defy an officer collecting revenue by any means then we are going “against an officer or officers” and are therefore considered dangerous and an insurrectionist.

In comes the 14th amendment paragraph to which the judge took his oath to obey. It states- “No person shall be a Senator or Representative in Congress, or elector of President and Vice President, or hold any office, civil or military, under the United States, or under any State, who having previously taken an oath, as a member of Congress, or as an officer of the United States, or as a member of any State legislature, or as an executive or judicial officer of any State, to support the Constitution of the United States, shall have engaged in insurrection or rebellion against same, or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof. But Congress may by vote of two-thirds of each House, remove such disabilities.

Please note the passage “or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof”. This is a key part because the judges are bound by oath to obey Article VI as to the debts to be paid and this paragraph three. You might see that paragraph four states that we cannot question the debt. We are a declared enemy under 12 Stat 319 and a declared enemy of the banks under section 5 b of the Trading with the Enemy Act that was not repealed with the rest of the act. Then if the judge, in ruling in the enemy’s favor in any revenue laws, would be violating his oath of office. So you cannot complain that they are not following the oath of office. If ruling against the IRS they would then be violating their oath to protect the status quo of the corporation.

We now proceed to the oath as was stated above. No where did they state in the oath that they were to obey the Bill of Rights as that is a separate document only dealing with United States citizens. It carries its own Preamble. It does not deal with the people in the states. The ultimate case for this is the John Barron vs the Mayor and the City of Baltimore, which I have gone into detail on the atgpress.com site, so there is no need to go into and rehash it here. Too many people have understood this Bill of Rights to be the Constitution. Again, it is not and rather to go into it here; that too is on the atgpress.com site.

In conclusion the judges are really obeying the contract that they have with the states and the Crown and they have no contract with you, the private man. See 14 Ga 438, Padleford and Fay vs the Mayor and City of Savannah. But you, as the private man, are a man under conquest and you better understand that because that misunderstanding is your downfall and why you cry that the judges are not obeying the contract. You just have been lied to all your lives and believe all the myths from the inception of this government called the United States, that that contract was formed by people like you, for you. That is the biggest lie in history. In fact I wrote an article called The Big Lie and the Big Lie II. In order to understand conquest I suggest you read James Montgomery’s articles on atgpress.com under Knowledge is Freedom.

Sincerely
The Informer 7-24-2002

Share

WHAT DOES THE WORD FEDERAL REALLY MEAN?

You always hear the phrase, pay your federal income tax . Now just what does this phrase consist of? Five words. The use of the word Federal is very important because all people believe it to mean the Federal government has an income tax that you must pay. But, why is it that no court will come down on the Private IRS when it says it collects for federal tax? It is proven to be private and an arm of the federal Reserve. This federal Reserve controls “The Bank” and the “International Monetary Fund”. Instead of going into the proofs by statute and making this a long writing, we find that the agents of the IRS are controlled by foreign operatives, namely the Governor of the IMF and the second alternate should he die, quit etc.. That is the Federal Reserve Chairman. Also the Alien Property Custodian, who you know as the Attorney General of the United States, is also the head member of the Interpol in this country and is a foreign agent. Both he and the Secretary of the Treasury under 26 U.S.C. 7401, are who all agents take their directive orders. Are they collecting for the federal government a “federal” income tax? No they are not. Now we come to those five little words of the above phrase and one word is federal. We all were taught it meant the national government. Well I think you are going to be very surprised as to what follows on that little misinterpreted word “Federal as we trace back it’s origin, called eytomolgy.
[Editor: see the above corrections to the information in red]

From the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary
FEDERAL– a. from L. faedus, a league, allied perhaps to Eng. Wed, Sax . Weddian,* * *.

1. Pertaining to a league or contract; derived from an agreement or covenant between parties , particularly between nations.

So the real meaning of “federal” is a contract or agreement and has nothing to do with a particular type government, although it was a contract that formed government. So to get the point across I will use “federal” in place of contract or agreement as they are one in the same. Well now, IRS is private agency. You federal with IRS when filing any form under perjury, i.e. W-4, 1040 or any IRS FORM . Your signature compels you to the”federal” that you owe an obligation to the “parties” as listed above. Note it said parties and nothing to do with government in it’s federal makeup. It said particular to, but not inclusive. The next Webster’s defining of the word will show it is not exclusive to nations.

2. Consisting in a compact between parties , particularly and chiefly between states or nations; YOU ARE NOT MENTIONED HERE AS YOU HAVE NO CONTRACT WITH A STATE OR A NATION. As stated by the judge in the Padleford case;

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in court, on the ground of a breach of the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. The States are the parties to it. And they may complain. If they do they are entitled to redress. Or they may waive the right to complain.”

Right here is all the proof you need that you are not a party to any compact ( contract/Agreement) with the federal government or state government for that matter under any constitution.

So we move on in #2 of Webster’s definition; founded on alliance by contract or mutual agreement; * * . Your mutual agreement is with a private organization using the word “federal” in a fraud, because of people’s ignorance. Remember words are used against you every time it is in the criminal’s best interest. Now when you look at Black’s Law dictionary, they are carefully couched in constitutional terms and nations and compacts between the states and never use “Federal” as defined by Webster’s. Even Ballentine’s uses it, as does Blacks. Now let’s move to present day ( 1969) Webster’s 7 th Collegiate Dictionary. This now states what The Law dictionaries state and has thrown out the etymology of the word federal so you would have no idea it means a contract between parties, leading you to believe everything “federal” pertains to government.

Humm, ok, so what about federal express? Does that mean government express? So I happen to have a 1911 Webster’s unabridged dictionary and the definition of “federal” is exactly word for word, the same as the 1828 Dictionary. So what happened in 1913 that changed the definition of “federal” to mean only pertaining to government? Think. Words are changed by men to mean what they want it to mean. The Random House Dictionary 1967 uses Webster’s 1828 definition, but also includes what the Law dictionaries define federal as. Here is proof as to how a word changes over the years by men that want control by starting to shove aside what “federal” really means. So the real word “FEDERAL” meant contract between men ( parties) or agreement between them. So now you have a federal with the IRS and you, in the forms or statement you sign.

When IRS takes you to court, that judge is sitting in equity due to that federal between you and the IRS, and he rightly rules always in favor of the IRS because you are breaching the federal (contract) you voluntarily made with them. For your “federal income tax” is in reality a contract tax, which you pay the private IRS for the use of the federal reserve note. This is a simple explanation because you would have to read all I have written on admiralty, the foreign control by the international bankers and the control of the private bar Assn. over the equity contract you placed yourself in, by signing the agreement of the IRS FORM, no matter what it might be. Now this is where the UCC kicks in and there are cases I have posted from time to time that proves they operate in UCC due to your “federal” with them. Sounds odd when you describe that contract with them doesn’t it? The cases are : UNITED STATES v. KIMBELL FOODS, INC., ET AL. No. 77-1359 SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES, 440 U.S. 715; 99 S. Ct. 1448; 1979 U.S. LEXIS 30; 59 L. Ed. 2d 711; 20 Collier Bankr. Cas. (MB) 1; 26 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1 and FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF FORT WORTH, Plaintiff, v. THE UNITED STATES, Defendant. No. 555-83C, UNITED STATES CLAIMS COURT 8 Cl. Ct. 774; 41 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. (Callaghan) 1583, September 27, 1985.

That is your “voluntary nature” of the private income tax, under fraud of the use of words to ensnare you. Once voluntary it then becomes mandatory to “pay your contract ( federal) income tax” .

The Informer 2007

Share

Will Smith – Cosby – Prior – Obama – Will We Ever Know?

So, if this is taking place. And has been taking place for decades. Even Centuries. It stands to reason that these people to counter a legitimate expose of this con game using various people, actors.. The establishment families would counter these exposes with false exposures of this con game using actors for various political characters. So the question is, who are the legit scientists exposing these frauds.. And who are the frauds working for them poisoning the well of information exposing the actors playing charades as various people in the news, including criminals, police officers, witnesses, victims, senators, congressmen and even presidents.. It is taking place.. yet we must be aware that there are false leads.. Making it so confusing that it becomes impossible to believe. Thats how they work. I think a member of these families is working a con game similar to an Alex Jones controlled opposition expose allegedly busting these actors while passing off incorrect or incomplete evidence of who they are and how many character roles they have been connected to.. People we have been told via the news that have passed away, have not.  Some of these people were our hero’s..  I’ll just leave you with this thought.. Several famous people we knew, that character, that persona, died. The actor, politician, singer.. athlete.. Moved on to another character role.. They retired from that role we knew them as so well..

“There are several explanations, ALL OF WHICH fall under the premise of a “Deception”, In some instances, multiple role playing, in other cases very possibly “Selective Breeding” ( or possibly “Incestual Breeding” customary of historical past Elite and Royalty families), Hollywood Special Effects Makeup, Plastic Surgery or even Human Cloning can all be included as  possibilities. And let’s not forget Photo Shopping of images and even computer generated video facial images is possible with technology today.”

Be careful what you believe out there.. And be careful what you spend your money on.. Such as autographed materials left behind by dead stars..

 

Share

Laughing At YOU Who Cannot SEE

Share

Will We Ever Know Who “Hillary” Really Is?

 

I think over the years there have been multiple actors playing this character.. And I think all of those actors have played various roles in other aspects of the entertainment industry such as singers and actors. Politicians are actors playing parts. Writers behind the scenes create legislation. All these actors do is present that legislation and eventually implement that legislation. It is all an act. It is all a grand illusion. I think whoever this actor is this actor will be the next puppet in a long line of controlled puppets playing out a role as the President of the privately owned and controlled Corporation known as the United States.

Share