July 21, 2018

The Constitution Delusion

The "Constitution" Delusion - Part I



ANTI-CONSTITUTIONALIST

by James Hazel

You will find the enclosed articles, published under the Masthead of
THE ANTI-CONSTITUTIONALIST, to be factual and provocative. They raise
disturbing questions concerning the basis of modern government. These
questions MUST BE ANSWERED by individuals who are in search of personal
Liberty. Failure to solve the riddles posed by a bewildering
Constitution can result, at best, in wasted energy and spirit-crushing
frustration. At worst, failure may result in individual tragedies and
collective catastrophe.

But an individual cannot answer questions he does not know how to ask;
or solve riddles of which he is unaware. That’s where you come in! It’s
important that these questions, issues and "riddles" be brought to the
attention of numerous Americans. 

It is essential that a dialogue begin to take place concerning the
intentions and covert motives behind the Constitution; and of that
instrument’s real purposes, as well as its grave, deleterious effects
throughout the history of America. Many of the issues raised in my
enclosed articles, have NEVER BEEN ARTICULATED BEFORE!
These are indeed novel, CUTTING EDGE CONCEPTS. As you will soon realize
-- they are well-documented; and you may wonder why no one, in over 200
years, has raised them before. You will find one answer to that
question in 'THE PSYCHOLOGY OF GULLIBILITY,' which is included herein. 

For the benefit of your subscribers and readers, I urge you to reprint
any or all of the enclosed ANTI-CONSTITUTIONALIST articles that you
find of interest. I will appreciate your giving appropriate credit for
the source. 

I also publish some powerful, mind-boggling, and thoroughly- documented
reviews and commentaries -- for details, contact: James Hazel, P.O. Box
863, Mount Angel, OR 97362. 

I Thank you in advance for taking the time to examine and review the
enclosures. But be forewarned: they may knock your socks off! 

THAT CUNNING CONSTITUTION On September 17, 1787, thirty-nine clever
businessmen proposed a Constitution for the United States of America.
Today, those 39 men are memorialized as the Founding Fathers. A more
perfect title for the consortium would be the Fleecing Fathers! 

With unparalleled conceit, they styled themselves: "We, the People of
the United States." Never before in history had there been a legal body
named "the People of the United States." In the Union of Independent
States, under the Articles of Confederation, there were citizens of a
State and residents or inhabitants of a State, but no collective status
named People of a State or of States. The Fleecing Fathers coined the
name for themselves. Their motives were as sinister as the Constitution
they tagged after their new name; after:
"We, the People of the United States, in Order to Form a More Perfect
Union..." 

The Charter they crafted was as hallucinatory [emphasis added] as a
President’s State of the Union address; wordsmithed to appear
innocuous, but in language calculated to slash, kill and indenture the
innocents who are lulled to sleep by euphonic rhetoric.

Their proposed constitution was advertised as the blueprint for eternal
bliss; for peace, safety and order for all free men then living, and
for their generations ad infinitum.

BUT IN FACT, it provided for that constitution to be a commercial
establishment; to be erected in an unapproachable place, above, around,
but most particularly BETWEEN the wealthy States of the Union whose
names it plagiarized. The face of the Preamble and the seven Articles
of Incorporation literally reveal to whom the profits and benefits are
assigned: to the Fleecing Fathers (We, the People) and their linear
descendants. 

Did you think the Constitution was a Warm, Fuzzy Sacred Puppy!? 

LITTLE KNOWN FACTS ABOUT THE CONSTITUTION 1. "We, the People of the
United States" includes ONLY those 39 men who signed the Constitution
on September 27, 1787. 

2. The only Public Authority vested in the 39 Signers was to "propose
amendments to the Articles of Confederation." In 1781, those Articles
of Confederation had established a perpetual Union of States. 

3. The Constitution established an entirely different Union, without
abolishing the perpetual Union. Its authors did not propose amendments
to the Articles of Confederation. They acted individually and
collectively in their private capacity. 

4. The Constitution is a private-law instrument which establishes a
commercial monopoly. Its primary "place of business" or Seat of
Government is between and above the States of the perpetual Union. 

5. The Constitution does not act directly on citizens of the States in
perpetual Union except on those citizens who voluntarily or tacitly
consented to be subject to its terms. 

6. The perpetual Union consisted of only those 13 sovereign States
which joined under the Articles of Confederation. No other States have
ever been added to that Union. 

7. All 50 "states," which are members of the "United States" pursuant
to the Constitution, are all "new States" or "statuses"; including the
original 13 state-names; surreptitiously appropriated from the 13
States in perpetual Union. 

8. Inhabitants, citizens or residents of the 37 district-states which
have been admitted to the different, more perfect Union by the
Congress, since the first 13 new States were admitted in 1789, have no
standing to claim the rights which are reserved to citizens of the
sovereign States in perpetual Union. They may claim their Natural
Birthrights, with no organized government to support and adjudicate
their claims. Or they may claim the puny, revocable privileges offered
by the Constitution in exchange for their allegiance and servile
servitude. 

THE CONSTITUTION: BLUEPRINT FOR HUMAN BONDAGE The 39 authors of the
Constitution, resorted to virtually every editorial trick in the book
to draft an instrument which would enable them, and their heirs, to
enslave whoever would dare cross, or be born into, their private
es-State. 

The instrument is all about enslaving the mass of men under the
euphemism of voluntary servitude. To interpret their motives and
methods, we examine the Corporate Articles which concern human slavery:
Article I, Section 9, Clauses 1, 4 and 5, and Article V (which refers
to Article I, Section 9). The most pertinent Clause of Article I,
provided as follows: 

"The Migration or importation of such Persons as any of the States now
existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the
Congress prior to the Year 1808, but a tax or duty may be imposed on
such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person." 

The 39 inventors of the Private Commercial Constitution were not
concerned with eventually abolishing slavery of black men, but with
extending coercive servitude to include ALL men other than themselves
and their posterity, while collecting a tax on import and export of
slaves, for the corporate coffer. 

As provided by Article VII, the Constitution was erected as an
Establishment (i.e., a place of business or commerce) on imaginary
lines ABOVE and BETWEEN the States which would ratify or agree to it,
and which would thereby collectively grant the 39 "We, the People" the
private corporate charter they proposed and applied for.
Having acquired absolute jurisdiction over the "places" drawn by
imaginary lines; they thereafter had the right to charge tolls, fees,
duties or taxes for any person or thing that may cross their private
property. 

Other provisions, including provision for establishing the corporate
headquarters in a district (of Columbia), situated between states; and
the promulgation of new Articles (known as the "13th and 14th
amendments"), with their prolific byelaws, made completion of their
scheme of mass enslavement, possible. 

DECODING THE MOTHER OF ALL RIDDLES When is this Union not the Union? 

In the Preamble of their Corporate Charter, known affectionately as the
Constitution for the United States of America, the Fleecing Fathers
voiced their intent to Form a more perfect Union. At first glance, a
literate student might suspect that the authors of the Articles of
Incorporation were unschooled in English Grammar. After all, what
educated person would add to a superlative, as in more perfect? First
impressions, however, are often wrong. 

Were the Fleecing Fathers unskilled in the art and science of writing?
HARDLY! In almost all cases, their expertise in English Grammar far
exceeded that of most modern postgraduates. They were true
symbol-aeographers; persons skilled in the art and cunning of making
legal instruments. 

When subjected to the Fog Index, a scientific process for determining
the complexity of written matter, the Constitution scores at
Grade-Level 26. In other words, comprehension requires 26 years of
formal academic experience! That’s a high school diploma plus 14 years
of graduate and postgraduate education. The authors of the Constitution
were indeed experts in the use of language. Where they said "..Form a
more perfect Union," that’s exactly what they meant! 

The toughest riddles to crack and the most amazing magic tricks, are
those which focus the "victim’s" attention away from the solution.
In the case of the cunning Constitution, its authors pointed to one
Union, while creating an entirely different Union; with word-magic
[emphasis added]. They formulated a riddle that has begged a solution
for over 200 years. 

Illusionists (liars), however carefully they try to conceal evidence,
invariably leave clues by which their delusions can be dissipated. The
Fleecing Fathers were no exception to the Rule of Riddles. 

They referred to three different forms of "Union." In their Preamble
they mentioned "a (more perfect) Union," which referred to "this
Union," mentioned in Article 1-3, and Article 4-3,4. In addition, they
spoke of "the Union" which, where used at Article 1-8-15, refers to the
pre-existing Union of Independent States; and where used at Article
2-3: to the new states which would be admitted into the more perfect
Union. 

For over 200 years, since the ambitious Constitution was proposed (in
1787), the appointed experts and "leaders" -- teachers, preachers and
politicians -- have trained the less-literate human herd in the false
precept that the present "Union" is a continuation of the one which
declared Independence from England in 1776. A literal reading of the
Constitution proves that IT IS NOT a "continuing government." The
present Union, is a fabrication; whose materials are fraud and deceit.
[emphasis added] 

The Preamble of the Constitution acknowledges the Union of States which
existed prior to its execution, and implies that the pre-existing Union
was perfect. And a "Union," which means one and unique (like "I," "Ego"
and "Self") is by definition perfect. An absolute unique thing cannot
logically be made more perfect, any more than it can be made more
unique. 

Not one word of the Fleecing Fathers’ Constitution acts directly on
that pre-established Union. No word repeals or abolishes that Union,
nor expands nor limits its jurisdiction. The Constitution merely
plagiarizes its name as a cunning means of exploiting and confiscating
the resources of the Several Lawful States; and converting their
citizens and inhabitants into human resources for the profit of the
Authors and their Posterity. 

As revealed in their Preamble, they arranged their Union in Order,
after and above the sequence of the Union which they usurped.
"When is THIS Union not the Union?" Solution: When the Union is the
original, lawful Union. 

A MOUSE IN BEN’S POCKET [from Joshua Mouse's Notes On the
Constitutional Convention] 

A cabal of businessmen, mostly Free Masons, met in secret sessions.
They were charged, as their respective credentials stated, to propose
amendments to the Articles of Confederation. They soon adopted a
different, more sinister agenda. 

In their public capacity, authorized by the Legislatures of several
independent States "to amend or revise the Articles of Confederation";
they were obligated to Convene in Public. 

But Secret Societies, by definition and necessity, meet in secret. As
for business or commercial negotiations, especially those which involve
trade secrets: the historical Maxim is that it’s nobody else’s
business. The fact that the Free Press and the general public were
barred from the Convention, raised many hackles and suspicions.
Patrick Henry, from his vantage point outside the bar, in Virginia,
thought he smelt a rat. 

The year was 1787. The place: Philadelphia’s State House. Security was
tight. A pundit was heard to exclaim: "Nary a mouse could breech the
guard." But one did. His name was Joshua. His notes read (in pertinent
part) as follows: 

JUNE 23, 1787, 2 O’clock P.M. -- The argument between Mason and
Hamilton wearied the Master, who called a recess. 

B. Franklin, G. Washington and A. Hamilton retired to the table near my
post, discretely distant from the others. Grasping fast my notepad, I
scurried into the generous pocket of Franklin’s coat to better hear,
while taking repast of crumbs his careless valet had missed on last
cleaning. 

GW: To continue the conversation began over dinner last night: of this
I am certain: to indenture the common herd to serve us like our black
slaves, will require their tacit consent. We must therefore devise an
instrument that they will unanimously misperceive to be in their best
interests, over our own. It must appear to be not only for them, but
more importantly, deriving from, of and by the common people, while the
ultimate power is reserved to us. 

AH: (Addressing Franklin): The proposition of our friend and lodge
Brother, George, deserves our most profound scrutiny and assistance. If
General Washington’s martial talents are excelled by others, it is his
experience and expertise in Agriculture; and especially in the
management, breeding, and domestication of black human animals. 

BF: Gentlemen, we have long had before us a model of a contract such as
George advocates. Back in ‘34, when I was a young printer, I published
Anderson’s Constitutions; which established the formal, written
government for the fraternity of Free Masons. Surely you have both
studied it as you have progressed through the Degrees. 

Recall its Article 10, which permits even probates of each Lodge to
merge their opinions with the majority, to be addressed to their
Master. Not, mind you, that the Master need act on the instructions of
the lowly. And consider Article 39, which provides for secret election
of the Grand Master and other officers; with its appearance that Power
lies with the majority; but is silent about the provocateurs who mingle
with it, fomenting the consensus of opinion. 

In combination, the Articles of Anderson’s Constitutions establishes a
government which superficially appears to be of, by and for the general
Lodge membership, but which in their legal language make all meaningful
power to reside in the hands of the Ruling Elite. 

Anderson’s is an exemplary model for accomplishing what George
proposes; that is: drawing the labor of all inhabitants, of every race
-- with the exception of ourselves and our posterity-- into a condition
of tacitly-consensual servitude; to be human resources for our eternal
Agri-Business. 

(Old Ben pushed a soiled handkerchief into my sanctuary. The discussion
continued for several more minutes; but muffled to my ear). 

I scampered from Franklin’s coat as the threesome arose, and resumed my
post near the woodpile. 

A. Hamilton received permission to address the Convention.
"Gentlemen," he began, "I propose a new form of government; a proposal
which will end our impasse and which, I predict, will garner the
unanimous approval of the governed..." 

THE NEW STATES OF AMERICA Constitutionalists are Constitutionalists
because they are confused.
All it takes for one to become a fervent Anti-Constitutionalist is A
BRIEF MOMENT OF CLARITY. This may be that moment! 

The typical Constitutionalist adheres religiously to the false tenet
that the Constitution provided for a continuing government for those
thirteen sovereign States which comprised the Union under the Articles
of Confederation. In other words, the Doctrine alleges that upon
ratification of the Constitution, those 13 States came into the more
perfect Union, lock, stock and barrel. 

In fact, only the NAMES of those 13 States were admitted into the more
perfect Union! After the new, different Union was established with the
admission of the first 13 names, the perpetual Union between the
Confederated States under the Articles of Confederation, continued to
exist. Neither the boundaries, sovereignty nor jurisdiction of any of
the Original States was altered or abolished.
And they exist today. Perpetuity is much longer than 200 years! 

The first 13 names to enter the more perfect Union were each admitted
under authority of Article IV, Section 3, of that Sacred Writ; that
Corporate Commercial Charter to which so many fools pledge their lives
and honor: the Constitution for the United States of America. It
states: 

"New States may be admitted by the Congress into this Union; but no new
State shall be formed or erected within the jurisdiction of another
(perpetual Union) State; nor any (new) State be formed by the Junction
of two or more (new) States, or parts of (new) States, without the
Consent of the Legislatures of the (new) States concerned as well as of
the Congress." 

We, the People, those 39 inventors of the more perfect Union, lacked
authority to act on the Sovereign States of the Confederation.
Therefore, each reference they made to "any State or States," referred
only to their New States - to names or Statuses. The Original States,
under the Articles of Confederation, remained intact and sovereign;
associated in an unique perpetual Union. 

By the explicit terms of the Charter (at Article IV, Section 3, above),
no new Name or Status (State) admitted into the more perfect Union,
could bring with it any jurisdiction (power and authority) of any
perpetual Union State. 

Article IV, Section 3, provides that new States "may be admitted by the
Congress into this Union." The Unanimous Order of the Convention,
issued simultaneous with the signing of the proposed Constitution,
provided that the Congress and President be selected and installed
BEFORE the terms of the Constitution, including the admission of any
States, would be executed. 

Before approving admission of new names or statuses (States) into
nominal, inferior membership; the "Chairman" (President) and “Board of
Directors” who were charged with enacting the bylaws (the Congress),
must be installed. 

All new members, names, statuses (States), beginning with the first 13,
were admitted only by approval of the pre-installed Congress. 

The "United States of America" under the commercial Constitution is a
clever forgery, which appropriates not only the names of lawful States
in perpetual Union under the Articles of Confederation, but even the
name of that pre-existing Union, itself! 

The Constitution is a gigantic fraud, perpetrated upon generations of
trusting and gullible inhabitants of North America. It doesn’t benefit
me; and it doesn’t benefit YOU, unless you are a direct descendant of
one of the 39 Fleecing Fathers. It is fit only for docile and
domesticated herd animals who do not object to being bred, harnessed
and milked for the profit of a privileged few. 

I have recorded here only one of the deceitful webs woven in that
commercial charter. There are many, many more. To ferret them out for
yourself you need only read the Constitution literally; as all legal
instruments must be interpreted. 

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF GULLIBILITY [Why Otherwise Intelligent People
Slavishly Support a Constitution They Don’t Understand.] 

At first glance, the impartial scientific observer discovers in the
Constitution what appear to be gross inconsistencies in Language and
grammar. But on closer inspection he finds they are not inconsistencies
or typos after all, but are in fact evidence of an underlying sinister
nature and intent. 

To offer up only one of dozens of examples, many of which have even
more grave implications than our instant sample: 

Article VI, Section 2, mentions "the Laws of the United States,"
providing that they shall constitute one-third of "the supreme Law of
the Land." That’s pretty heavy stuff, with no room for ambiguity! But
Article I, Section 8, Clause 15, mentions different Laws which, not
being the Laws of the United States, are deemed inferior. Those
inferior Laws are the Laws which the Militia may be called forth to
execute. They are "the Laws of the Union." 

The Apologist for the Constitution and its authors, the Fleecing
Fathers, will allege that those giant, highly-educated minds used the
United States and the Union interchangeably, and that they mean one and
the same thing. THEY DON’T! In fact, "the United States" and "the
Union," as legal entities, are as different as black and white or night
and day! They are not literally the same. And in the context of
history, they are as dissimilar as a real person and an artificial
person. 

If the Apologist is wrong and the literal language of the Constitution
is the Legal Reality, what are the implications, beyond confusing the
Hell out of millions of somnambulistic Americans? Consider this: 

While Article I identifies the purpose of the Militia (plural) as being
to execute the (inferior) Laws of the Union, and the unanimously
misconstrued Second Amendment defines the purpose of the Militia as
being necessary to the security of a free State; what does that say
about "the United States" and its supreme Laws? BINGO! Of Course! -
"the United States" is an UN-FREE STATE, and pre-existing States of the
Union (that unique, perpetual legal entity under the preexisting
Articles of Confederation) and the Laws thereof, are the free States
which the Militia is charged with defending. 

As these words are written the confused members of the many upstart
"Citizen Militia" (respectively singular) have not yet been slaughtered
or taken as prisoners by the Armed Forces of the United States. (Time
will correct that nonfeasance). To a man, the members of self-appointed
Militia pledge their very lives to the defense and support of the
Constitution... not to the defense of the lawful perpetual Union, and
to the execution of its Laws. No sane and fully-informed Man would
consider supporting a constitution that is unfit for, and designed to
"kill," the natural, inborn freedom of Men and Women.
What psychological imperatives drive people to commit their minds and
bodies to such delusions? The following analogy should suffice to get
the point across: A certain child acts like a perfect angel at home;
well-mannered, ingratiating, studious and seemingly empathetic. But
when out of his mother’s line of vision, he is a budding sociopath. He
steals from cons and manipulates everyone in his destructive path. He
is the veritable Bad Seed. To the casual observer, he is a classic
schizophrenic; a split or dual personality.
But in fact his real personality is sociopathic. The personality he
presents to his mother is superficial, merely an appearance. 

Mother isn’t completely stupid. She sees inconsistencies between her
child’s at-home and away personas. There are the unexplained fruits of
them that appear in the child’s room. There are the "hateful rumors" of
mutilation of small animals, spread by neighbors. 

But Mother ignores the "inconsistencies," and gives the benefit of the
doubt to her sweet, precocious child. After all SHE is Good. She knows
that. And therefore, her child, however poorly she understands his
nature, must also be Good. He is, after all, a child that derives of
her, by her and in the universal view, for the Mother. Protecting,
supporting and defending her offspring (like supporting a misunderstood
constitution) is an emotional necessity having nothing to do with
reason and logic. 

It’s one thing, and as excusable as it is understandable, to permit
one’s emotion to rule in matters concerning his progeny. But where
legal instruments are concerned, which can result in our death,
deprivation, imprisonment or other restraints on our birthrights to
Liberty; we dare not suspend our reason, logic, common sense and
capacity for CRITICAL ANALYSIS! 

Editor’s Comments: In regarding the pretended "perpetual Union" created
by the so-called "Articles of Confederation" as lawful, Mr.
Hazel makes a serious error. As Lysander Spooner effectively indicated
in 'No Treason: The Constitution of No Authority,' all supposed
"constitutions" are instruments of fraud and deception. This applies as
much to the pretended "Articles of Confederation" as it applies to the
falsely-called "U.S. Constitution." 

The spinners of all supposed "constitutions" are spiders spinning webs
of illusion, delusion, and hallucination!
Share

Antonin Scalia INVESTIGATION: STAGED MURDER OR REAL MURDER, Searching Out Discrepancies

Share

The War On Population

 

The Self-Ennobling Ones emissary, Henry Kissenger, briefing the game play for war, economic collapse, and the outcome to the New World Order of Global Government –

Vladimir Putin and Henry Kissinger Meet To Discuss New World Order
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=128732

Ratcheting up East-West preagreed pre-planned preparations for world war III –

DOD requesting 3,000-5,000 more troops for Europe in FY17 budget
http://www.stripes.com/dod-requesting-3-000-5-000-more-troops-for-europe-in-fy17-budget-1.391680

U.S. Fortifying Europe’s East to Deter Putin
http://www.nytimes.com/2016/02/02/world/europe/us-fortifying-europes-east-to-deter-putin.html?_r=0

U.S. Presence In Eastern Europe Is Vital, Commanding General Says
http://www.npr.org/2016/02/05/465672051/u-s-presence-in-eastern-europe-is-vital-commanding-general-says

Poland, courting NATO, plans to boost Middle East military involvement
http://www.reuters.com/article/us-poland-nato-mideast-idUSKCN0VI1XX

News: Towards the build-up to war –

http://www.smh.com.au/world/nato-moves-to-squeeze-russia-out-as-risk-of-unintended-war-in-eastern-europe-rises-20160211-gms2yt.html

http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/russia-shows-off-military-might-black-sea-nato-bolsters-troops-1543523

https://www.rt.com/news/332104-nato-force-eastern-europe/

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/defence/12149403/Nato-may-deploy-thousands-of-troops-in-Europe-to-ward-off-Russia.html

Reference material:

https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/speculative-dates-given-for-world-war-iii/

Share

Gnostic Masonic Pope’s Powers Anti Biblical And Anti The Real Christ of The Bible

 

The Pope, the Superior General, and the Papacy Are All Frauds;

“The Pope is not only the representative of Jesus Christ, but he is Jesus Christ, Himself, hidden under the veil of human flesh.” — Catholic NationalJuly 1895.

“The Pope and God are the same, so he has all power in Heaven and earth.” — Pope Pius V, quoted in Barclay, Chapter XXVII, p. 218, “Cities Petrus Bertanous”.

“We hold upon this earth the place of God almighty.” —

Pope Leo XIII, Encyclical Letter, June 20, 1894.

“He is a heretic who does not believe what the Roman Hierarchy teaches.” — The American Textbook of Popery, p 164 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).
“Heretics (those who are not members of the Catholic Church or who do not hold to Catholic doctrine) worship a God who is a liar, and a Christ who is a liar.” — St. Augustine, (quoted in “Patrologiae Cursus Completus: Series Graca”, by Fr. J. P.Migne, Paris: 1866, 42:207).

The church may by divine right (confiscate the property of heretics, imprison their person, and condemn them to flames). In our age, the right to inflict the severest penalties, even death, belongs to the church. There is no graver offense than heresy, therefore it must be rooted out.” — Public Eccliastical, Vol. 2, p.142.“When confronted with heresy, she (Catholic Church) does not content herself with persuasion, arguments of an intellectual and moral order appear to her insufficient, and she has recourse to force, to corporal punishment, to torture.” — The Rector of the Catholic Institute of Paris, H.M.A. Baudrillart, quoted in The Catholic Church, The Renaissance, and Protestantism 182-183.

“A heretic merits the pains of fire….By the Gospel, the canons, civil law, and custom, heretics must be burned.” — The American Textbook of Popery, p 164 (quoting from the “Directory for the Inquisitors”).

The Pope is of great authority and power, that he is able to modify, declare, or interpret even divine laws. The Pope can modify divine law, since his power is not of man, but of God, and he acts as vicegerent of God upon earth…” — Lucius Ferraris, in “Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica”, Volume V, article on “Papa, Article II”, titled “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility”, #30, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition.“We may according to the fullness of our power, dispose of the law and dispense above the law. Those whom the Pope of Romedoth separate, it is not a man that separates them but God. For the Pope holdeth place on earth, not simply of a man but of the true God….dissolves, not by human but rather by divine authority….I am in all and above all, so that God Himself and I, the vicar of God, hath both one consistory, and I am able to do almost all that God can do…Wherefore, no marvel, if it be in my power to dispense with all things, yea with the precepts of Christ.” — Decretales Domini Gregori ix Translatione Episcoporum, (on the Transference of Bishops), title 7, chapter 3; Corpus Juris Canonice (2nd Leipzig ed., 1881), col. 99; (Paris, 1612), tom. 2, Decretales, col. 205 (while Innocent III was Pope).

We confess that the Pope has power of changing Scripture and of adding to it, and taking from itaccording to his will.” — Roman Catholic Confessions for Protestants Oath, Article XI, (Confessio Romano-Catholica in Hungaria Evangelicis publice praescripta te proposita, editi a Streitwolf), as recorded in Congressional Record of the U.S.A., House Bill 1523, Contested election case of Eugene C. Bonniwell, against Thos. S. Butler, Feb. 15, 1913.

“And God himself is obliged to abide by the judgment of his priest and either not to pardon or to pardon, according as they refuse to give absolution, provided the penitent is capable of it.” — St. Alphonsus De Liguori, in The Dignity of the Priesthood, p. 27.
Unless therefore they receive saving baptism in the Catholic Church, which is one, they cannot be saved, but will be condemned with the carnal in the judgment of the Lord Christ.” — Catholic Bishop Nemesianus of Thubunae, The Seventh Council of Carthage Under Cyprian, Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. V.

“When we say that faith is necessary for the remission of sins, we mean to speak of the Catholic faith, not heretical faith. Without the habit of this faith, no man is justified.” — St. Alphonsus Maria Liguori, (quoted in Apostolic Digest, by Michael Malone, Book 3: “The Book of Faith”, Chapter 1, “There is No Salvation Except in the Catholic Faith”).

Share

Let the Subjects Keep The Idea That Their Freewill Is Associated With Your Corporate Government

One of the WLNs “Brains” showing its ignorance; These people are just as silly as any other citizen claiming they are sovereign, and have intellectual rights to the COTUS.. The COTUS is and can be comprehended, Patrick Henry did so he was there with various other anti federalists. Also, Lysander Spooner. John Taylor.. And no obviously this “brain” never touched a copy of the Law of Nations.. It is an legal impossibility for a citizen to be a sovereign. A sovereign builds corporate nations under the guidelines of the Law of Nations which the Founding Farters did. The citizens just looked for work. Those 322 million citizens are not party to the constitutional contract according to the Padelford Case in the U.S. Supreme Court. The framers intent is SIMPLE. It was for them “We The People” only and their “Posterity.”

Not the people that would end up being the subjects under this constituted authority.

The COTUS is the private intellectual property of the corporate entity these men established. Their Posterity meaning their bloodlines are managing that corporate entity. All 322 million citizens, the majority of which are completely clueless on the subject itself are all subjects. Slaves. Human resources property. It was simply in their best interests that the populace believed in the lie that it was for all of them.. As Edmond Burke advised in his speech.

“….Let the colonies always keep the idea of their civil rights associated with your government — they will cling and grapple to you, and no force under heaven will be of power to tear them from their allegiance. But let it be once understood that your government may be one thing and their privileges another, that these two things may exist without any mutual relation — the cement is gone, the cohesion is loosened, and everything hastens to decay and dissolution. As long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign authority of this country as the sanctuary of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our common faith, wherever the chosen race and sons of England worship freedom, they will turn their faces towards you. The more they multiply, the more friends you will have, the more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect will be their obedience. Slavery they can have they may have it from Spain, they may have it from Prussia. But until you become lost to all feeling of your true interest and your natural dignity, freedom they can have from none but you. This commodity of price, of which you have the monopoly. This is the true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the commerce of the colonies, and through them secures to you the wealth of the world. Deny them this participation of freedom, and you break that sole bond which originally made, and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. . . Let us get an American revenue as we have got an American empire. English privileges have made it all that it is; English privileges alone will make it all it can be.” Edmund Burke, speech on conciliation with America, pages 71-72, March 22, 1775.

 

“You do realize none of the US Constitution’s framers are available to explain to you what their “initial intent, purpose and duty” was, don’t you? Or have you found a way to go back in time? If so, do you think any two of them will agree on every particular?

Or do you think there’s some kind of objective reality underlying the words of the Constitution, that you can discern all by yourself? Why do you think you will succeed when, for more than two and a quarter centuries, all others have failed?

Who else do you suggest should “re-examine” the rulings of the Supreme Court of the US, if not you alone? Whose particular interpretation of the framer’s intent should we prefer, if not SCOTUS’s? Why not involve “the Citizenry”? Shouldn’t all 322-million-odd of us have an equal part, since every one of us has an equal stake in the outcome? Surely you don’t think “popular sovereignty” means “some are more sovereign than others”, do you?”—Mal Adapted

“Never mind, I yield to your vastly superior ignorance, with my fear for our country’s future vastly magnified. I’m ever more thankful I’m not a father!”—Mal Adapted

Also while he prattles on that no one really comprehends the COTUS he seems to think he does..

So Mal Adapted like HLB doesn’t know what he’s talking about either.. And there is 2500+ pages of legal references in the law libraries on this issue that prove it.

“We the People” pertains primarily to the signatories, a deal they all went in on together. The United States of America is a British plantation formerly referred to as the American Colonies. Their reason for doing this was to secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves (meaning them, the signatories) and our Posterity. (meaning their Posterity, their offspring) Posterity, all the descendants of a person in a direct line to the remotest gen POSTHUMOUS CHILD 920 POTENTIAL eration. [Breckinridge v. Denny, 8 Bush (Ky.) 027] When they use capitalization it changes the meaning of a word. Thatcapitonym, that Capital “P” in Posterity, it’s for emphasis. It’s a “direct line” to a proper noun, a direct descendant, because in the language procedure if I capitalize the first letter in the middle of a sentence like that, then I am not referring the general definition. I can’t be, which only leaves what remains, a Bloodline.This is all just family owned corporate business… And as Carlin stated, you ain’t in it.

The ultimate question here is where is your contract?

Catch 22s of the U.S. Constitution

When a society is beset by problems too big or too difficult to solve, that society tends to obsess over trivia, and this society is doing just that.

UN Charter: Chapter 1, Article 1
http://www.un.org/en/documents/charter/chapter1.shtml

“To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace”

UN Resolution A/RES/25/2625 1970
http://www.un-documents.net/a25r2625.htm

“By virtue of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, all peoples have the right freely to determine, without external interference, their political status and to pursue their economic, social and cultural development, and every State has the duty to respect this right in accordance with the provisions of the Charter.”

AND

“Every State has the duty to promote, through joint and separate action, realization of the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, in accordance with the provisions of the Charter, and to render assistance to the United Nations in carrying out the responsibilities entrusted to it by the Charter regarding the implementation of the principle”

Oxford Public International Law States:
http://opil.ouplaw.com/view/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e873

“The political origins of the modern concept of self-determination can be traced back to the Declaration of Independence of the United States of America of 4 July 1776, which proclaimed that governments derived ‘their just powers from the consent of the governed’ and that ‘whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it’.”

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights: Article 1
https://treaties.un.org/doc/Publication/UNTS/Volume%20999/volume-999-I-14668-English.pdf

“All peoples have the right of self-determination. By virtue of that right they freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.”

LAW OF NATIONS

“In this treatise it will appear, in what manner States, as such, ought to regulate all their actions. We shall examine the obligations of a people as well towards themselves as towards other nations; and by that means we shall discover the Rights which result from these obligations. For, the right being nothing more than the power of doing what is morally possible, that is to say, what is proper and consistent with duty  …

Book 1: Section 220

“We have observed above (§ 212), that they have a right to enter into the society of which their fathers were members. But every man is born free; and the son of a citizen, when come to the years of discretion, may examine whether it be convenient for him to join the society for which he was destined by his birth. If he does not find it advantageous to remain in it, he is at liberty to quit it,”

US Constitution on the LAW OF NATIONS – Article 1, Section 8

“To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offences against the Law of Nations”

International Convention concerning the Laws and Customs of War on Land and the LAW OF NATIONS (The Hague, 18 October 1907)
http://avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/hague04.asp

Until a more complete code of the laws of war can be drawn up, the High Contracting Parties deem it expedient to declare that, in cases not covered by the rules adopted by them, the inhabitants and the belligerents remain under the protection and governance of the principles of the law of nations, derived from the usages established among civilized peoples, from the laws of humanity, and from the dictates of the public conscience.

The Nation-State and Global Order: A Historical introduction to Contemporary Politics on the Law of Nations – Page 22 (This is very old)

“Parallel to Roman civil law was another system of law based on the practical principles used by the governors of towns and justices when they tried specific cases in the law tribunals. This law was more sensitive to regional differences and the needs and customs of the people living in specific areas. Eventually, this customary law became known as the jus gentium or “law of the nations….the jus gentium gained the idea of the normative law of nature, which embodied universal moral laws that could be perceived through reason.”


After running his website “Matrix Solutions” or therightofselfdetermination.com (now closed for membership), without redaction of any of the material facts presented…Matrix Solutions has archived ALL the material onto 22 DVD’s called the “Deprogramming Series”. As it was stated in the first introduction video: we must first DEPROGRAM before we can REPROGRAM. Matrix Solutions found it NECESSARY to have a hard copy for those who are serious about learning the truth of their self “enslavement”. Those that want to be free and those who have the ability to be free….have a moral duty to do so! Universally, there is no other way.

As Theodore Roosevelt stated at the Jamestown Exposition in 1907:

“It behooves us to remember that men can never escape being governed. Either they must govern themselves or they must submit to being governed by others. If from lawlessness or fickleness, from folly or self-indulgence, they refuse to govern themselves, then most assuredly in the end they will have to be governed from the outside. They can prevent the need of government from without only by showing that they possess the power of government from within. A sovereign cannot make excuses for his failures; a sovereign must accept the responsibility for the exercise of the power that inheres in him; and where, as is true in our Republic, the people are sovereign, then the people must show a sober understanding and a sane and steadfast purpose if they are to preserve that orderly liberty upon which as a foundation every republic must rest.”

Read the simply presented information titled, ‘OF FICTIONS (The world of the imagination)’, approximately 1/2 way down the link given as –

OWNERSHIP OF LAW
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/04/25/ownership-of-law/

You can not use the Constitution to defend yourself because you are not a party to it. (Padelford Fay & Co. v. The Mayor and Alderman of The City of Savannah 14 Georgia 438, 520)

Share

The Power Of The Signatories Of The COTUS Never Left Their Posterity, And It IS NOT YOU SLAVE!

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Share

The U.S. Citizen Serfs Lost Their Country in 1933 And Were Placed On Negotiable Debt Instruments Welfare

The United States went “bankrupt” in 1933. [President Roosevelt Executive Order 6073, 6102,

6111, 6260; Senate Report 93-549, pgs. 187 & 594, 1973]

In 1950, declared “bankruptcy and reorganization”. Secretary of Treasury appointer receiver in

the bankruptcy [Reorganization Plan, No. 26, 5 U.S.C.A. 903; Public Law 94-564; Legislative

History, Pg. 5967]

The Secretary of the Treasury is the “Governor” of the International Monetary Fund, Inc. of the

U.N. [Public Law 94-564, supra, pg. 5942; U.S. Government Manual 1990/91, pgs. 480-81;

26 U.S.C.A. 7701(a)(11); Treasury Delegation Order No 150-10]

On Oct. 28th 1977, the United States as a “Corporator” and “State” declared insolvancy. State

banks and most other banks were put under control of the “Governor” of the “Fund” (I.M.F.). 26

IRC 165 (g)(1); U.C.C. 1-201(23), C.R.S. 39-22-103.5, Westfall vs. Braley, 10 Ohio 188,

75 Am. Dec. 509, Adams vs. Richardson, 337 S.W. 2d. 911 Ward vs. Smith, 7 Wall 447

State of National Emergency

“Since March 9th, 1933, the United States has been in a state of declared national emergency…”

(Senate Resolution 9, 93d. Congress, 1st. Session, Foreward, 1973)

“When Congress declares an emergency, there is no Constitution…” (Congressman Beck,

Congressional Record, Farm Bill, 1933)

“A majority of people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For

40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have in varying

degrees been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency…” — Senate

Report 93-549 (Introduction) 1973

“The President may: Seize property, organize commodities, assign military forces abroad, institute

Martial Law, seize and control and transportation and communication, regulate operation of private

enterprise, restrict travel, and in a plethora of particular ways, control the lives of all American

citizens”. — Senate Report 93-549; Senate Resolution 9, 93d Congress, 1st. Session (III) 1973

See: Chapter 1, Title 1, Section 48, Statute 1, March 9, 1933; Proclamation 2038; Title 12 U.S.C

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has

been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1,

Public Law 89-719; declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and

insolvent. H.J.R. 192, 73rd Congress m session June 5, 1933 – Joint

Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause

dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official

capacities of all United States Governmental Offices, Officers, and

Departments and is further evidence that the United States Federal

Government exists today in name only. Speaker-Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the

House:

95(b)The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International

Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International

Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now

operating within a de facto status in name only under Emergency War Powers.

With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the

receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the

United States.

This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an

established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This

act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office

of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International

Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H.R. 13955 reads in part:

“The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing

the United States.”

The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal “person” to duplicate a “Joint Stock Trust” in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 was legislated post-facto (to 1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. [1:9:3]

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender or underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same. Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until the Federal Reserve Act (1913)

“Hypothecated” all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, -in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title. The U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a “beneficiary” of the trust via his/her birth certificate.

In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties,assets and labor of their “subjects,” the 14th Amendment U.S. citizen, to the Federal Reserve System. In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit “money substitute” it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as a condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn’t have any assets, they assigned the private property of their “economic slaves”, the U.S. citizens as collateral against the un-payable federal debt. They also pledged the unincorporated federal territories, national parks forests, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

 

“None are more hopelessly enslaved than those who falsely believe they are free. ”
–Johann Wolfgang von Goethe

Share

The U.S. Constitution Was Not Made For You

Share

Epigenome

 

An epigenome consists of a record of the chemical changes to the DNA and histone proteins of an organism; these changes can be passed down to an organism’s offspring via transgenerational epigenetic inheritance. Changes to the epigenome can result in changes to the structure of chromatin and changes to the function of the genome.  (wikipedia)

 

In the “2015 Lubbock Conference Session 4:  Rob Sibka – Nephilim Genetics and the Rise of the X-Men” video, changes in genes via the epigenome are explained in short detail neat the time-frame of 104 minutes.

 

 

Share

No Treason XVIII – Lysander Spooner

Lysander Spooner

The Constitution having never been signed by anybody; and there being no other open, written, or authentic contract between any parties whatever, by virtue of which the United States government, so called, is maintained; and it being well known that none but male persons, of twenty-one years of age and upwards, are allowed any voice in the government; and it being also well known that a large number of these adult persons seldom or never vote at all; and that all those who do vote, do so secretly (by secret ballot), and in a way to prevent their individual votes being known either to the world, or even to each other; and consequently in a way to make no one openly responsible for the acts of their agents or representatives,–all these things being known, the questions arise: Who compose the real governing power in the country? Who are the men, the responsible men, who rob us of our property? Restrain us of our liberty? Subject us to their arbitrary dominion? And devastate our homes, and shoot us down by the hundreds of thousands, if we resist? How shall we find these men? How shall we know them from others? How shall we defend ourselves and our property against them? Who, of our neighbors, are members of this secret band of robbers and murderers? How can we know which are their houses, that we may burn or demolish them? Which their property, that we may destroy it? Which their persons, that we may kill them, and rid the world and ourselves of such tyrants and monsters?
These are questions that must be answered before men can be free; before they can protect themselves against this secret band of robbers and murderers, who now plunder, enslave, and destroy them.

The answer to these questions is, that only those who have the will and the power to shoot down their fellow men, are the real rulers in this, as in all other (so-called) civilized countries; for by no others will civilized men be robbed, or enslaved.

Among savages, mere physical strength, on the part of one man may enable him to rob, enslave, or kill another man. Among barbarians, mere physical strength, on the part of a body of men, disciplined, and acting in concert, though with very little money or other wealth, may, under some circumstances, enable them to rob, enslave, or kill another body of men, as numerous, or perhaps even more numerous, than themselves. And among both savages and barbarians, mere want may sometimes compel one man to sell himself as a slave to another. But with (so-called) civilized peoples, among whom knowledge, wealth, and the means of acting in concert, have become diffused; and who have invented such weapons and other means of defense as to render mere physical strength of less importance; and by whom soldiers in any requisite number, and other instrumentalities of war in any requisite amount, can always be had for money, the question of war, and consequently the question of power, is little else than a mere question of money. As a necessary consequence, those who stand ready to furnish this money, are the real rulers. It is so in Europe, and it is so in this country.

In Europe, the nominal rulers, the emperors and kings and parliaments, are anything but the real rulers of their respective countries. They are little or nothing else than mere tools, employed by the wealthy to rob, enslave, and (if need be) murder those who have less wealth, or none at all.

The Rothschilds, and that class of money-lenders of whom they are the representatives and agents–men who never think of lending a shilling to their next-door neighbors, for purposes of honest industry, unless upon the most ample security, and at the highest rate of interest–stand ready, at all times, to lend money in unlimited amounts to those robbers and murderers, who call themselves governments, to be expended in shooting down those who do not submit quietly to being robbed and enslaved.

They lend their money in this manner, knowing that it is to be expended in murdering their fellow men, for simply seeking their liberty and their rights; knowing also that neither the interest nor the principal will ever be paid, except as it will be extorted under terror of the repetition of such murders as those for which the money lent is to be expended.

These money-lenders, the Rothschilds, for example, say to themselves: If we lend a hundred millions sterling to the queen and parliament of England, it will enable them to murder twenty, fifty or a hundred thousand people in England, Ireland, or India; and the terror inspired by such wholesale murder, will enable them to keep the whole people of those countries in subjection for twenty, or perhaps fifty, years to come; to control all their trade and industry; and to extort from them large amounts of money, under the name of taxes; and from the wealth thus extorted from them, they (the queen and parliament) can afford to pay us a higher rate of interest for our money than we can get in any other way. Or, if we lend this sum to the emperor of Austria, it will enable him to murder so many of his people as to strike terror into the rest, and thus enable him to keep them in subjection, and extort money from them, for twenty or fifty years to come. And they say the same in regard to the emperor of Russia, the king of Prussia, the emperor of France, or any other ruler, so called, who, in their judgment, will be able, by murdering a reasonable portion of his people, to keep the rest in subjection, and extort money from them, for a long time to come, to pay the interest and principal of the money lent him.

And why are these men so ready to lend money for murdering their fellow men? Solely for this reason, viz., that such loans are considered better investments than loans for purposes of honest industry. They pay higher rates of interest; and it is less trouble to look after them. This is the whole matter.

The question of making these loans is, with these lenders, a mere question of pecuniary profit. They lend money to be expended in robbing, enslaving, and murdering their fellow men, solely because, on the whole, such loans pay better than any others. They are no respecters of persons, no superstitious fools, that reverence monarchs. They care no more for a king, or an emperor, than they do for a beggar, except as he is a better customer, and can pay them better interest for their money. If they doubt his ability to make his murders successful for maintaining his power, and thus extorting money from his people in future, they dismiss him as unceremoniously as they would dismiss any other hopeless bankrupt, who should want to borrow money to save himself from open insolvency.

When these great lenders of blood-money, like the Rothschilds, have loaned vast sums in this way, for purposes of murder, to an emperor or a king, they sell out the bonds taken by them, in small amounts, to anybody, and everybody, who are disposed to buy them at satisfactory prices, to hold as investments. They (the Rothschilds) thus soon get back their money, with great profits; and are now ready to lend money in the same way again to any other robber and murderer, called an emperor or a king, who, they think, is likely to be successful in his robberies and murders, and able to pay a good price for the money necessary to carry them on.

This business of lending blood-money is one of the most thoroughly sordid, cold-blooded, and criminal that was ever carried on, to any considerable extent, amongst human beings. It is like lending money to slave traders, or to common robbers and pirates, to be repaid out of their plunder. And the men who loan money to governments, so called, for the purpose of enabling the latter to rob, enslave, and murder their people, are among the greatest villains that the world has ever seen. And they as much deserve to be hunted and killed (if they cannot otherwise be got rid of) as any slave traders, robbers, or pirates that ever lived.

When these emperors and kings, so-called, have obtained their loans, they proceed to hire and train immense numbers of professional murderers, called soldiers, and employ them in shooting down all who resist their demands for money. In fact, most of them keep large bodies of these murderers constantly in their service, as their only means of enforcing their extortions. There are now, I think, four or five millions of these professional murderers constantly employed by the so-called sovereigns of Europe. The enslaved people are, of course, forced to support and pay all these murderers, as well as to submit to all the other extortions which these murderers are employed to enforce.

It is only in this way that most of the so-called governments of Europe are maintained. These so-called governments are in reality only great bands of robbers and murderers, organized, disciplined, and constantly on the alert. And the so-called sovereigns, in these different governments, are simply the heads, or chiefs, of different bands of robbers and murderers. And these heads or chiefs are dependent upon the lenders of blood-money for the means to carry on their robberies and murders. They could not sustain themselves a moment but for the loans made to them by these blood-money loan-mongers. And their first care is to maintain their credit with them; for they know their end is come, the instant their credit with them fails. Consequently the first proceeds of their extortions are scrupulously applied to the payment of the interest on their loans

In addition to paying the interest on their bonds, they perhaps grant to the holders of them great monopolies in banking, like the Banks of England, of France, and of Vienna; with the agreement that these banks shall furnish money whenever, in sudden emergencies, it may be necessary to shoot down more of their people. Perhaps also, by means of tariffs on competing imports, they give great monopolies to certain branches of industry, in which these lenders of blood-money are engaged. They also, by unequal taxation, exempt wholly or partially the property of these loan-mongers, and throw corresponding burdens upon those who are too poor and weak to resist.

Thus it is evident that all these men, who call themselves by the high-sounding names of Emperors, Kings, Sovereigns, Monarchs, Most Christian Majesties, Most Catholic Majesties, High Mightinesses, Most Serene and Potent Princes, and the like, and who claim to rule “by the grace of God,” by “Divine Right”–that is, by special authority from Heaven–are intrinsically not only the merest miscreants and wretches, engaged solely in plundering, enslaving, and murdering their fellow men, but that they are also the merest hangers on, the servile, obsequious, fawning dependents and tools of these blood-money loan-mongers, on whom they rely for the means to carry on their crimes. These loan-mongers, like the Rothschilds, laugh in their sleeves, and say to themselves: These despicable creatures, who call themselves emperors, and kings, and majesties, and most serene and potent princes; who profess to wear crowns, and sit on thrones; who deck themselves with ribbons, and feathers, and jewels; and surround themselves with hired flatterers and lickspittles; and whom we suffer to strut around, and palm themselves off, upon fools and slaves, as sovereigns and lawgivers specially appointed by Almighty God; and to hold themselves out as the sole fountains of honors, and dignities, and wealth, and power–all these miscreants and impostors know that we make them, and use them; that in us they live, move, and have their being; that we require them (as the price of their positions) to take upon themselves all the labor, all the danger, and all the odium of all the crimes they commit for our profit; and that we will unmake them, strip them of their gewgaws, and send them out into the world as beggars, or give them over to the vengeance of the people they have enslaved, the moment they refuse to commit any crime we require of them, or to pay over to us such share of the proceeds of their robberies as we see fit to demand.–Lysander Spooner

Share