April 24, 2017

Endangered Species Act Petitions for Florida Black Bear and Mojave Desert Tortoise do not Warrant Further Action

Press Release from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service:

The U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service has completed reviews of petitions to list the Florida black bear and uplist the Mojave population of desert tortoise from threatened to endangered under the Endangered Species Act (ESA). The Service found that neither petition presented substantial information that the requested action may be warranted and so no further action will be taken.

Due to conservation efforts by the Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, private landowners, conservation groups and others, Florida black bear numbers have rebounded from approximately 300 individuals in the 1970s to some 4,350 today. Conservation efforts will continue for the Mojave population of desert tortoise, which will remain listed as threatened under the ESA.

The Federal Register docket numbers and links for the two findings are:

Species Range Docket Number and Link
Florida black bear AL, FL, GA, MS FWS­–R4–ES–2017–0015
Mojave population of desert tortoise AZ, CA, NV, UT FWS­–R8–ES–2017–0009

The notice for the above findings is available here: https://www.federalregister.gov/public-inspection.

The Service is actively engaged with conservation partners and the public in the search for improved and innovative ways to conserve and recover imperiled species. For more information on the ESA listing process, including 90-day findings and status reviews, please visit: www.fws.gov/endangered/esa-library/pdf/listing.pdf.

Isle Royale’s Reversal of Global Warming

If we listen to those who assume the high ground and are the only bearers of “Best Available Science” we are told that moose are struggling to survive in several places across the country and it’s all, directly or indirectly, being caused by global warming.

We learn that the wolf population on Isle Royale has, for all intent and purposes, killed itself off for various reasons. Because the wolves are gone, the moose population is “undergoing a population explosion.”

But don’t think for a moment it is exploding because there’s only two wolves left alive. No, no! It must be that somehow, the two remaining wolves have “magically,” as their magic has no bounds, reversed the effects of global warming and thus are growing more moose to kill and eat. According to the same “High-Grounders” because there are now more moose, the result of the wolves’ magic, more magic will take place in that wolves will rebound because there is more food. Seeing all those moose causes their reproductive organs to go bonkers. Let’s hope the wolves aren’t too busy moving rivers to save the birds. And even though disease and inbreeding killed the wolves, we know the moose have no diseases and there are no “weak and sickly” ones left because the moose magically took care of that.

Maybe it’s time that we look very closely at these magical moose such that Al Gore can spread them across the entire planet to spare us all from the devastation of global warming. Maybe they will even magically kill the sickly and weak among the people. Think of the money we could save.

FAKE: Wildlife, Border Wall, Sensibility and Idealism All Rolled Into One

On the one side, idiots believe a giant wall stretching the length of the U.S. and Mexico border will solve all the immigrant problems, including terrorism, and “make America great again.” On another side you got useless eaters claiming that maintaining space for animals to freely roam between the U.S. and Mexico is more important than the beliefs of wall-builders.

And then there’s this guy. One who thinks it’s very important to put up a wall – actually only a fragmented wall – and, very important to leave corridors for the animals that would be off limits to the illegal immigrants. This he calls a compromise.

Of course if the entire issue was really about border security, or illegal immigration/open borders, then we secure the border.

The author of the linked-to piece, offers hints as to what might actually be behind this effort to stop the building of the wall, but fails in his attempts to fix a fake problem by ignoring those whom he says might be behind the problem. That makes little sense. If there is an actual security problem at the U.S. and Mexico border that requires spending billions of dollars to construct a wall to keep them out (if any wall will actually do that – think tunnels, etc.), then certainly the wall goes up and the animals will somehow (sob, cry, wail, gnash) have to figure out how to survive.

If it’s only half important to waste money on a partial wall, then why spend the money and have any wall at all.

American’s, misled as they are, really have their heads screwed on cross threaded.

Living In Lock-Down Because You’re An Idiot

In San Mateo, California, during the wee hours of the morning, a mountain lion entered a residence and made a meal out of a small dog. Authorities have stated, “… to secure their doors and windows before sleeping.”

Jim Beers comments on this event: “The human parallels between mountain lions, grizzly bears and wolves are many and large.  From the human excuses to justify their actions i.e. “unusual” and “young animal” to “they belong in settled landscapes like this because”…(?) to the media, professors and bureaucrats that sell this abomination as the “new normal”.  While the dog is valued property, the undeniable fact that the next time it could be an American child or adult in what was once termed the families “castle” is evident to the most blind supporter of California’s evil policies and laws regarding these animals.  What are the “tolerable” consequences; a child per year, two joggers a year, three attacks and serious injuries per year, ten horse per year, 20 dogs per year ???  The fact that hundreds of millions of tax dollars have already been spent on establishing these deadly predators in the settled landscapes of The Lower 48 States and that millions of our tax dollars are being spent annually to establish, mythologize, excuse and babysit these predators only points out the cultural decline and moral vacuum that is hollowing out America today.

“Cougars, wolves and grizzly bears do not belong in settled landscapes and it will, hopefully, one day again be seen and understood  as a travesty of justice and the value of human lives in totality that we allowed one group of people (be they voting blocs, pandering politicians, self-serving bureaucrats, radical organizations with anti-human values or world government enemies of our Constitution) to impose on rural, suburban and other persons and their families these deadly dangerous animals.  There is no acceptable legal or moral excuse or justification for this situation of encouraging and tolerating such animals where many of those being forced to live amongst them DO NOT WANT THEM.”

Jim Beers

To read some comments about this event, some have great entertainment value, follow this link to Instapundit.

1989 C-SPAN Interview; William Lutz – Political-Business “Doublespeak”

Heartland Institutes Flawed Arguments Intentional

Heartland Institute is fake Climate Change Opposition..

Why Scientists Disagree at Global Warming: The NIPCC Report on Scientific Consensus.
https://www.heartland.org/_template-assets/documents/Books/Why%20Scientists%20Disagree%20Second%20Edition%20with%20covers.pdf

If i were the ruling Aristocracy, behind the various infamous think tank groups touting CC-33 anthropogenic climate change. The United Nations Environmental Policies Biodiversity Assessment info.. The Club of Rome.. The Lunar Society otherwise known as the Royal Society of London.. And of course the Vatican who is in the thick of all of this.. I’d set up scientific controlled opposition deniers to give the appearance that denial of CC-33 anthropogenic climate change is being done by incompetent scientists with questionable credentials.. Thus the agenda itself continues forward.. The problem of course is always going to be the little people being accused of being the anthropogenic climate change cause.. The direct drivers because of over population movement via fuels, jobs and their consumption.. It’s odd that allegedly highly educated people don’t see the large corporations touting this CC-33 anthropogenic climate change issue as being the largest contributors to the problem.. They’re still flying all over the world in their Gulf Streams living their high lives while the populace, at least half of them are desperate for jobs, careers..

Apparently the economicide of scarcity isn’t moving along fast enough to suit people who advocate for CC-33 of which they don’t comprehend what it actually is.  Many who are not suffering anything at all from these extremely tough times that are only going to get harsher and more confusing as we move forward.. Obviously the Heartland Institute’s document is intended to be flawed.. Many of you on the left and the right bought it… In other words the people putting forth the Heartland Institute’s CC-33 denial are simply part of the team working towards implementing the so called control mechanisms of enforcement of CC-33 laws, not yet enforced. It’s coming.. Hegel’s dialectic is the tool in use here.. which manipulates the U.S. and the worlds citizens into a frenzied circular pattern of thought and action. Every time they fight for or defend against an ideology they are playing a necessary role in Marx and Engels’ versus Frederich Nietzsche’s grand design to advance humanity into a UNEP Scientific dictatorship.

The synthetic Hegelian solution to all these conflicts can’t be introduced unless all U.S. citizens take a side for or against thus entering the controlled debate which helps facilitate the advance the of Climate Change agenda. The Marxist’s-Nietzscheists communitarian world wide agenda is moving along at breakneck speed. The CC-33 deniers social engineering is categorizing those non believers of this scientific CC-33 anthropogenic climate change as terrorists. The legalization of mass genocidal murder, an inquisition by a new name.. UNEP.. Climate Change is depopulation of direct drivers.. PEOPLE.. CC-33 CLIMATE CHANGE is double speak, code which means mankind is over populated thus the need for depopulation is necessary and the denial means depopulation is not necessary.. The 33 means the Masonic Club 33 of  the 33rd degree initiates who are behind this depopulation agenda..

“Out of evil comes good, however, and the confusion of tongues gave rise to the ancient practice of Masons conversing without the use of speech.” —A New Encyclopedia of Freemasonry and of cognate instituted mysteries; Their Rites; Literature and History. New York Weathervane Books – 1970 vol. 1 p. 61-82

They communicate with double speak, numbers, geomatria..

 

Some links may have conveniently been shut off since I perused them myself..

We read –
An indirect driver, such as human population
Source:
Ecosystem Change
http://www.greenfacts.org/en/ecosystems/millennium-assessment-2/4-factors-changes.htm
Driver
http://www.greenfacts.org/glossary/def/driver.htm
Managing ‘drivers’ means getting rid of people –
Demographic,economic and social drivers
http://www.webworld.unesco.org/water/wwap/wwdr/wwdr3/pdf/12_WWDR3_ch_2.pdf
KEY DRIVERS OF CHANGE
http://www.fao.org/docrep/014/i2093e/i2093e01.pdf
Driving environmental change
http://www.unmillenniumproject.org/documents/Environment-chapter2.pdf
protecting water-related ecosystems for sustainable development
http://www.iucn.org/sites/dev/files/import/downloads/salathe_1.pdf
Ecosystem Change and Human Well-being
Research and Monitoring Priorities Based on the Findings of the Millennium
Ecosystem Assessment
http://www.icsu.org/publications/reports-and-reviews/ecosystem-change-report/ICSU-UNESCO-UNU_Ecosystem_Report.pdf

Sovereign Military Order of Malta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
Globalism Through U.N.’S Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, And Vision 2050
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/08/01/globalism-u-n-s-agenda-21-agenda-2030-vision-2050/
Reference Source:
Globalism through U.N.’s Agenda 21, Agenda 2030, and Vision 2050
http://www.canadafreepress.com/article/globalism-through-u.n.s-agenda-21-agenda-2030-and-vision-2050#
SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENTKNOWLEDGE PLATFORM
CLP’s Climate Vision 2050
http://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/partnership/?p=809

Did you think sustainable development could be anything other than worldwide eugenics and its accompanying murderous depopulation –
Population Matters – Contribution to discussion of the Sustainable Development Goals
https://webcache.googleusercontent.com/search?q=cache:nSdEOAoEkOEJ:https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/getWSDoc.php%3Fid%3D971+&cd=1&hl=pl&ct=clnk&gl=pl
Sourced:
Population Matters
http://www.sustainabledevelopment.un.org/getWSDoc.php?id=971
Population Matters
http://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=1&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjTh8TYhPHQAhVGJsAKHTeUA4oQFggaMAA&url=https%3A%2F%2Fsustainabledevelopment.un.org%2FgetWSDoc.php%3Fid%3D971&usg=AFQjCNF-4paCvl56o_qcspF2vNo6-EgcgQ&bvm=bv.141320020,d.ZGg
Population Matters – Contribution to discussion of the Sustainable Development Goals
http://www.gci.org.uk/Documents/Population-Matters-SDGs-Proposal_pp207_1.pdf
~
Sustainable Development, which is now known as ‘Vision 2050?, is an agenda created and implemented (with the use of double-speak,) by its owners – The Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy –
Pope Francis Evaluates 2030 Agenda For Sustainable Development
http://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/10/20/pope-francis-evaluates-2030-agenda-sustainable-development/
Pope Francis extends Catholic priests’ power to forgive abortion
http://www.edition.cnn.com/2016/11/21/europe/pope-francis-absolve-abortion/
Pope Francis Extends Priests’ Ability to Forgive Abortion

~
The real origins of Sustainable Development are with the church’s doctrine of purgatory, together with their ownership of the mechanism and origins of economic inequality, that is, their ownership of the lie of banking that artificially and falsely reflects economic activity.
KNOW THEN, THAT ALL ROADS LEAD TO ROME –
WE COME TO BRING DEATH
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/09/27/we-come-to-bring-death/
Additional –
THE ANATOMY OF DOMINANCE HAS ALWAYS BEEN – “BECAUSE THEY SAY SO”
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/10/19/the-anatomy-of-dominance-has-always-been-because-they-say-so/
Vision 2050 is an international and borderless platform for all young members and volunteers of the Order of Malta
http://www.orderofmaltavision2050.com/
About Vision 2050
http://www.orderofmaltavision2050.com/about/
List of Princes and Grand Masters of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Princes_and_Grand_Masters_of_the_Sovereign_Military_Order_of_Malta
THE PRINCE AND GRAND MASTER
http://www.smomun.org/the-order-and-its-institutions/the-prince-and-grandmaster/

Americans of Anasazi
http://www.fiaah.org/content/view/24/59/
INSTRUCTIONS FOR REGISTRATION/RACIAL INTEGRITY LAWS
http://piedmontvahistory.org/archives14/items/show/237
Thoth
http://www.ancientegyptonline.co.uk/thoth.html
The American nations; or, outlines of their general history, ancient and modern, including: the whole history of the earth and mankind in the western hemisphere; the philosophy of American history; the annals, traditions, civilization, lanuguages, &c., of all the American nations, tribes, empires, and states
by Rafinesque, C. S. (Constantine Samuel), 1783-1840
Published 1836
Volume 1
Publisher Philadelphia, C. S. Rafinesque
https://ia800202.us.archive.org/2/items/nationsamerica01rafirich/nationsamerica01rafirich.pdf

The Rothschild Reserves –

In 1912 Charles Rothschild founded the ‘Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves’ (SPNR).

More on the Rothschild Reserves –

“What was new about this approach to preserving ‘wild life’ was that it focussed on the habitat rather than just the individual species within it. It highlighted a growing belief that places needed protection from development and other damage. It showed a desire for an ordered and reasoned approach to acquiring nature reserves, in the face of increasign pressure on the natural world and culminated in a ‘shopping list’ of ideal sites – the Rothschild Reserves.”

“…the SPNR always established who the landowner was. The intention at this time was to purchase the land, turn it into a nature reserve and then hand it over to the National Trust to manage under special conditions.”

“It was believed that it was better to fence off nature and leave it to its own devices, rather than practically manage it…”

“The elite conservation crusaders could be seen to have inhabited a moral high ground where, from a lofty height, they shook their fists at progress in their quest for ‘primeval country’ and their desire to shut it off.”

Source:

The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/rothschildreserves

~

Climate Change & Wildlife –

“Climate change is a significant threat to the UK’s wildlife. The Wildlife Trusts believe that nature should be central to both climate change adaptation (e.g. through the use of natural processes to reduce flood risk) and mitigation (e.g. through the protection and restoration of peat and peatlands to store and sequester carbon).”

“However there is now widespread agreement among scientists that we are living in an era of accelerated climate change, much of which can be attributed to increased human activity (for example through increased carbon emmissions from air pollution).”

Note.-

The words in the phrase, ‘widespread agreement among scientists’, are words that can only be attributed to ‘conflict-of-interest’ based political consesus science, and NOT ‘factual science’.

“Climate change means that there are complex demands being placed on land for food, wildlife, recreation and development. Wildlife has adapted to climate change in the past but our modern landscapes – full of buildings, transport links and intensively managed farmland and fragmented natural habitats – present a new challenge to species. It is vital that we manage and use land sustainably, so it allows plants and animals to move and adapt to new conditions for survival as the climate changes. The Wildlife Trusts’ vision for A Living Landscape is working to bring about landscape scale restoration of the natural environment and adaptation to climate change, realising and using the multiple benefits provided by nature.”

“Protecting and restoring our natural environment and ecosystems is important in its own right…Flood prevention, crop pollination, carbon absorption, clean and healthy water sources – these benefits of our natural environment must all be considered and maximised as we prepare for the effects of climate change. Critically, we need to restore healthy, Living Landscapes that help to alleviate floods, control pollution and help us cope with extremes of temperature.”

“Many of The Wildlife Trusts’ Living Landscape schemes have been designed with climate change adaptation at the forefront. At the heart of Living Landscape approach is habitat restoration and connectivity.”

Source:

Climate Change & Wildlife
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/climate-change

The Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Giammaria Ortes:
The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/ortes.htm

Recruiting the military for Agenda 21’s depopulation genocidal murder

“Sustainabilities justification for depopulation, is that there are too many people to harmonise with the earth’s environment, and therefore depopulation is an absolute necessity. Of course, with the fraudulent excuse of false ‘climate change’ science as the driving force behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s ambitions for mass genocidal murder, it comes as no surprise that the Self-Ennobling Ones law enforcement and in particular their military are now positioning and prioritising their role towards sustainabilities climate change depopulation ‘development’ agenda, to have the military engage in excused mass murder, on behalf of the Self-Ennobling Ones, covertly presented under a ‘new energy security strategy’ –”—There No Debt

PENTAGON PREPARES FOR CENTURY OF CLIMATE EMERGENCIES AND OIL WARS
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Pentagon_prepares_for_century_of_climate_emergencies_and_oil_wars/45538/0/38/38/Y/M.html

One would have to be a genuine dunce not to see what they’re setting up.. How about a Philosophical Heuristic Dunce? Maybe you know a few of those.. I certainly do..

Why Would Anyone Protect and Perpetuate Mixed-Breed Wild Dogs in Our Forests?

Now that Roxanne Quimby got her land designated as a national monument, the push is now on to turn the rest of northwestern Maine into useless, inaccessible wasteland some like to call “wilderness.”

As part of this push for locking up land, comes the ignorant belief that wolves are a magic formula needed to carry out the false theory that “Nature” balances itself. Unfortunately we will never get rid of that lie because it became a very powerful tool when it was criminally used to introduce wolves into the Greater Yellowstone area, for personal and monetary gain. Even since the man who invented the false claim has rescinded his theory, the echo chambers of the media, along with environmental useful idiots, continue to perpetuate the fantasy because they want to and need to. It’s that simple.

However, aside from all of this banter about whether or not wolves walk on water and whether or not land should be locked up and called wilderness, there can be serious argument made that in the Lower 48 States, there does not exist a “pure” wolf or a coyote for that matter.

In an article found in the Bangor Daily News, it begins, “WSCH 6’s Bill Green reported this week that a new wolf-coyote hybrid “thrives” in Maine.”

If this is true, and there exists studies that tell us that the wild dogs found in most of the northeast section of country are of a mixed breed of wolf, coyote and domestic dog and any and all canine breeds and mixtures. One would imagine that that mixture is all over the place as, by now, cross-bred wild dogs have mated with other cross-bred wild dogs, and so it goes.

Do these wild dogs “thrive” in Maine, as Bill Green states? Reports vary, some stating that Maine has a “coyote” (hybrid) population in excess of 20,000. Thriving? It would seem that way to me, especially when you consider that it was only in my childhood days – 1960s – that rumors were spreading about “coyotes” showing up in places in the Pine Tree State. Maine never had a viable population of “coyotes” until it began to grow in the 1960s, due to expansion of populations – probably already some kind of add-mixture of wild dog.

Some claim this cross-breeding (media and others like to call the offspring a hybrid) is a natural phenomenon but is it?

Also found in this article is the following statement: “When Europeans began to colonize the United States, wolves were abundant throughout the country.” What does that mean precisely? What is the term “abundant” one’s weighted perception? It appears Bill Green and I “perceive” that a mixed-breed of wild dog “thrives” in Maine. Those who see any dog, wild or domestic, in vast quantities, as something that should be perpetuated, wouldn’t see 20,000 coyotes/cross-breeds as thriving or abundant. But, what about science….real science?

Most certain, the settlers who came before us, learned quickly that large predators in the woods were dangerous and competed with them for, not only their livestock, but for other wild game that was necessary for survival. And thus they killed these wild predators whenever they could. Shouldn’t they have?

But were these wolves “abundant” when the settlers arrived? Bearing in mind the term “abundant,” perhaps the best way to learn about this is to recall the historic accounts, often found in hunters’ and trappers’ journals, including such recordings as those of Lewis and Clark, and names such as Smith, Ogden, Sublette, Work, Meek, Freemont, Preuss, Simpson and Egan. After all, they were the ones on the land even before the settlers.

Most of their journals tell a quite different story of “abundance.” With the exception of some localized areas, west of the Mississippi, both game and wolves were scarce. Explorers, through what is now the Yellowstone Basin, comment that they never heard wolves or coyotes howl. There was little game to be found, and often these explorers, unable to find game to sustain themselves, resorted to killing and eating horse meat. Lewis and Clark experienced the same thing finding themselves trading with the Indians for their domestic dogs to eat in order to survive. From my perspective, that does not describe what I would call an abundance of anything, except perhaps hunger.

Science shows us that natural segregation, often achieved through natural landscape barriers, and population limits found in widespread outbreaks of disease, kept species like wild canines apart in order that cross-breeding was not a common thing. We have learned that the Native Americans knew about wolves and the trouble they caused. Not all Indians worshiped the wolf or found some kind of spiritual guidance or direction from them. The natives deliberately cross-bred certain domesticated dogs with wild dogs in hopes of creating a better hunting animal.

Teddy Roosevelt wrote extensively of his travels, often describing the different looks and sizes of wild dogs he encountered. Roosevelt was one of the first to write about the big “timber wolves” that seemed to exist only beyond the high mountains of what is now known as the Sasquatch Range. What coyotes there were, existed down on the plains.

Common sense should tell us that if we are interested in protecting a wolf or a coyote, we should be doing our best to insure that the two species are not forced into the same habitats where cross-breeding would become even more common, thus mixing the species and destroying the wolf or coyote genes. People, often in their greed and animal perversions, insist on seeing these animals from their cars and out the back windows of their houses. This is a great formula for the destruction of, not only wolves and coyotes, but many other species due to predation and disease.

Granted this effort of segregation becomes a more difficult task with a growing population of man, but protecting the populations of wild wolves and coyotes to numbers that are historically higher than when the settlers first arrived, thinking we are doing great things for the animals, is all wrong.

Even many who would concur that there are “hybrid” wild dogs living throughout Maine and other areas of the country, seem to only care about protecting whatever the cross-bred creature is that exists for the moment. Our own U.S. Government seems to share that same belief.

In attempts to perpetuate wild dogs in the Desert Southwest and in the Southeast, government agents knowingly and illegally introduced real hybrid semi-wild dogs. This is not only illegal but a violation of the Endangered Species Act. What are we doing?

If Maine and other regions are now dealing with “thriving” populations of hybrid wild dogs, there’s a reason for that. The worst thing we can do is perpetuate this cross-breed. If we want to protect the wolf and the coyote, we should be doing all we can to rid the landscape of these hybrid, invasive species. Not only do the genes of wild canines become mixed up, but what also changes with the cross-mixture is behavior – behavior that is most often unpredictable. This adds to the issue of public safety.

To argue that Maine should have wolves is one thing. To make the claim that what the Government and others who are suggesting introduction is actually a pure wolf is foolishness. Perhaps the only wolf that resembles a pure wolf exists in the wilderness regions far to our north, where they belong. These are not indigenous to Maine. Introduction of such a beast, or any kind of add-mixture, semi-wild dogs, calling them wolves, is a violation of the law and should not be tolerated…that is if we actually care about protecting real wolves.

*Note* – I provided few links in this writing. I have written extensively on this subject, including a book. You can use the search function of this website to find more information about most everything I have written in this article.

Hold On To Your Wallet

Letter to the St. Paul Pioneer Press – by James Beers

Hold On To Your Wallet

The Headline says it all; “DNR wants increased fees”.

Our “perpetual tax and spend” Governor and his DNR Commissioner “need” hunting and fishing license fee increases of 10 to 15% “to keep up with inflation”. Haven’t our federal politicians claimed there is no inflation, or is that just to keep us retirees from asking questions?

So, “without the hike, the DNR will be forced to make several cuts”, the first of which will be “reducing the workforce”. Then without “additional funding”, roads will not be maintained, there will be fewer wildlife surveys, and walleye stocking will decrease.

Before we swallow this bait, please answer two questions:

  1. What is the trend of license sales for non-resident deer hunting, non-resident fishing and resident hunting and fishing?  Considering the devastation of walleye lakes due to indiscriminate netting, the loss of moose hunting license fees due to wolves, and the complaints of deer hunters about wolf decimation of northern deer herds; paying you to “maintain wildlife programs at current levels” seems foolish.
  2. How much of our license dollars, federal Excise Taxes and other funds including all the “incidental” law enforcement, trapping, public relations, etc. are you spending on wolves and how much more will you be spending on wolves if and when your federal counterparts “Return Wolf Management to the State” except, of course for our right to set numbers, distributions, methods of take, sale of parts, etc.?

Note to the St. Paul paper.  Since you so blithely refer to folks like me as members of the “hook and bullet” groups; how about referring to those “supporters” of the increases as “wolf-lover” groups and “indiscriminate fish-netter-lover” groups?

Jim Beers

16 April 2017

If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.  Thanks.

Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC.  He also served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in the Aleutian Islands.  He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC.  He testified three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority.  He resides in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.

Jim Beers is available to speak or for consulting.

You can receive future articles by sending a request with your e-mail address to:   jimbeers7@comcast.net

Trump Is All Talk And No Action

Kim Illuminati SUN And Kim Ill UN -United Nations Controlled Opposition