April 3, 2020

And the Darwin Awards Goes To The Natural Man

If we look all around at everything going on around us within every culture every group we see they the natural man are extremely dissatisfied with the customs and traditions natural law world system they’re all trying to, fighting to fix..Those stuck in the manufactured daydream of Lollipop History, simply haven’t a clue as to what is really going on. But somehow they’re all going to fix this world system.

Law of Hammurabi. Council of Trent. Law of Nations. International Law. Politically Chartered Vatican City State. Politically Chartered Great Britain. Politically Charted United States. Politically Chartered Atlantic Charter United Nations. Politically Chartered United Nations Environmental Policies.

All the elements of the United Nations Environmental Policies Economic STRIFE have been LET LOOSE upon the Earth by those seeking to depopulate direct drivers – people. Every Nation/State/estate/society on this earth is subordinated to the Temporal Power of the Pope, the real owners of the customs and traditions of mankind. They are ALL implementing economical eugenics..

1 Corinthians 2:14 But the natural man perceiveth not the things of the Spirit of EL: for they are foolishness unto him, neither can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned.

Casuistry/sophism is an aspect of a piece of political philosophy for political purpose writing that is deliberately written so that the average reader will understand it as saying one (“exoteric”) thing but the special few for whom it is intended will grasp its real (“esoteric”) meaning. We could call it Double Speak. Only it’s much worse. It’s to easy to decode the Double Speak so they’ve implemented English Hebrew Alphanumerical coding into their clever communications. Somebody might want to tell the English Anglish literal experts..

So it is settled, the Darwin Awards Goes To The Natural Man trying to save this world by helping the owners of this world system managing their world. Which is according to their legalized rhetoric over populated with, you guessed it, natural men loving their law of nature.

Share

Freemasonic Book Every Wall is a Lodge

Share

The Final Case Against Lucifer

Share

Making Stuff Up, Shifts the Wildlife Management Paradigm

The Tavistock Institute of Human Relations (TIHR), formerly known as the Wellington House, is, to put it bluntly so all can understand, a brainwashing institution whose sole purpose is: “…to shape the moral, spiritual, cultural, political and economic decline of the United States of America.” I’m quite certain the majority of readers do not want to believe this and that’s alright. It doesn’t really matter one way or the other what you think about all this. TIHR does believe this and they are going about their business while we dither blindly.

A few years back, I wrote a piece all about the Wellington House, now the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations. If interested in learning some of how and why the world has gotten to the point that everything is upside-down and makes little sense, click on the link above and have a good read. I will make a note at this juncture that most all of the information that I wrote about back then is factually true. Some aspects of the piece, I have since gained much knowledge about and would change. However, the concept and the lists of organizations that are readily contributing to the altering of the way you think (or lack thereof) and act, are accurate.

Carl Pope, a former executive director of the Sierra Club, once said, “…environmentalism is part of a broader progressive movement.” The Broader Progressive Movement has many agendas, one of which, goes along with the Tavistock’s stated mission: “…to shape the moral, spiritual, cultural, political and economic decline of the United States of America.” It is no real secret that this movement intends to “gain new understanding and knowledge” (a stated goal of the Left’s Second Nature and the Aspen Institute) and to “shift the paradigm” as to how wildlife management is discussed and perceived. If you don’t understand what all of this means, it’s easy. They intend to “gain new understanding and knowledge,” i.e. make stuff up, and “shift the paradigm,” or force the lies down all of our throats.

To accomplish this, enough people must be duped into believing what they are being told. I often refer to these followers as useful idiots and/or “True Believers.” This task becomes easier the more dumbed down a society becomes; those incapable of independent and critical thinking.

Eric Hoffer, author of “The True Believer: Thoughts on the Nature of Mass Movements,” writes: “All mass movements generate in their adherents a readiness to die and a proclivity for united action; all of them, irrespective of the doctrine they preach, and the program they project, breed fanaticism, enthusiasm, fervent hope, hatred and intolerance; all of them are capable of releasing a powerful flow of activity in certain departments of life; all of them demand blind faith and single hearted allegiance.

“All movements however different in doctrine and aspiration, draw their early adherence from the same types of humanity; they all appeal to the same types of minds. At first they come gently. With power they speak and act boldly.”

A close examination of exactly what Hoffer is describing is enough to blow the minds of the sane and rational, i.e. those with a brain left to think and to see.

If Environmentalism, which goes hand in hand with Animal Rights, is only a part of a broader promotion of the Progressive Movement, then it is only logical to conclude that things like wolf introduction, predator protection, balance of nature, Climate Change, and wildlife management in general are part of that movement in which “new understanding and knowledge” (lies) and a “paradigm shift” (forcing it down our throats) are all a part of the bigger movement.

Why is it necessary to make stuff up and then force everyone to see things differently? Does “truth” then become nothing more than one’s ideological narrative, because that, they have been convinced, is the “new knowledge and understanding?”

This illness is prevalent in everything…I mean EVERYTHING. Climate Change, as sold to the masses of True Believers, is an unprovable theory, and yet those claiming to be scientists, and have paid for a college degree that gives them the right to say so, practice their profession based on an unprovable theory.

Decades have been spent fine tuning the North American Model of Wildlife Management, and the Broader Progressive Movement is intent on destroying it; or in their own words, to promote their “new knowledge and understanding,” regardless of whether it is fact or fiction, and then force all others to accept their new religion.

State fish and wildlife departments are now 100% rife with Environmentalism. Most of what they do, to the few of us remaining, makes no sense as they muddle through confounded acts of what they believe to be science/biology that are strangled by Climate Change.

These departments are controlled by the non scientific strings of Environmentalism now disguised as “social demands.”

I could spend the day giving example after example of how, through the deliberate act of “to shape the moral, spiritual, cultural, political and economic decline of the United States of America,” Environmentalism, a broader progressive movement, but if you can’t see it and won’t see it, then you are, more than likely, a blind True Believer: one who has at first, “come gently” but now, “speak and act boldly.”

As part of this movement, you have been brainwashed. It began a long time ago, and you cannot see it. That’s all part of the program. I wonder if you are “ready to die” with “a proclivity for united action?”

This is a real pandemic…eventually it will get us all.

Share

Not Quite Perfect…Yet

This morning as I was preparing my “Open Thread” post, I realized that since early January I have been posting the year as 2019.

Oh well!

Share

Wyoming: Wolf Free Zone and Game Populations Disappearing

Below are some interesting charts, graphs, and data about wolves and the effects they are having on Wyoming’s big game populations of moose, elk, and deer. The data comes from the Wyoming Game and Fish.

Somehow, throughout the criminal activities of Government and rogue non governmental groups to illegally force gray wolves onto the landscape of the Northern Rocky Mountains and the Greater Yellowstone Region, Wyoming was able, through legal channels, to designate the majority of the geographic region of the state as “Wolf Free.” This designation means that in these zones wolves can essentially be killed at any time by any means and without a license.

The data that is compiled comes from those areas where controlling of wolves as a predator, is strictly regulated by state and federal governments. These zones where wolves are protected, at least to some degree, regardless of the lies being perpetuated by government agencies, non government agencies, and the media, are experiencing devastating losses to moose, elk, and deer. The insanity persists that people be forced to live in scarcity to protect a large predator that has no good purpose in people-settled lanscapes.

The lies within the rigged Beast System continue…unchecked.

Share

Is What We Are Being Told About Habitat Really True?

One has to wonder. I was reading this morning about issues with feeding whitetail deer in Maine. George Smith, outdoor writer, shares with his readers that: “A SAM [Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine] survey of our members in 2018 revealed that 26% had fed deer sometime during the previous 3 winters. That equates to about 2,000 feeding sites, just among SAM members!” This information, as I understand it, does not include data from food plots, i.e. those places around where people plant crops specifically to feed deer.

So, let’s say there are about 2,000 feeding sites across Maine each winter season. We don’t know the location of all these feeding stations and/or the ones that aren’t included in the SAM survey report. (Is it reasonable to think that there are more deer feeding sites from people who are NOT members of SAM?) Consider that there is a possibility that if there are feeding stations near each other, some feed lots are sharing the feeding of the same deer.

Regardless, can you guess what the average number of deer that are being fed per feed site? If I were to take a wild guess, I’ve seen some where at peak feeding time, it appears as many as 100 deer are chowing down. Back yard feed sites, might get around a dozen, maybe more and maybe less.

For argument sake, let’s say each of the 2,000 + deer feeding sites nourishes 30 deer (I think that might be conservative so bear with me). That would mean, excluding some deer that might move between two or more feeding sites, perhaps 60,000 deer are receiving supplemental nourishment they wouldn’t get if they were on their own.

If the 60,000+ deer receiving supplemental nourishment (and once again, this does not include summer food plots and those feed stations that SAM isn’t aware of) comprise at least one quarter, and perhaps one half, of the statewide deer population, and not having any scientific data on geographic locations, what is this activity doing to the survival and promotion of healthier deer throughout the state?

We are repeatedly told that during the harshest parts of the winter months, deer browse on stuff that is of little or no value as far as nutrition goes. The fiber ingested more or less fills an empty stomach. So, ask yourself whether or not the deer that are being fed are better nourished. If so, what does that mean for the long term for deer?

If you’ve ever watched deer interact at a feed station, you will notice that the bigger deer bully the smaller deer, such that the smaller, and less aggressive deer, get what’s left over. Biologists and others have stated that feed plots aren’t “fair” because of this natural dynamic. Shouldn’t we consider that whatever “scraps” the runts get is certainly more than they would get without food sites?

Have you ever been to a deer wintering area and observed the realities taking place there? One quite obvious dynamic is the neat trimming that takes place of the bows of trees in the lowest parts of the canopy. As winter progresses and the snow level rises, so too does the trim line at the lower parts of the trees. When the trees have all been trimmed that can more or less easily be reached, deer begin to stand up on the hind legs in order to reach the tree bows. This means the bigger (taller) deer get food and the runts don’t. According to the misguided thinking of some, this natural event wouldn’t be “fair” either.

What does happen then with a quarter, or more, of the total deer population in Maine getting “unnatural” food? Do these deer receive the necessary energy to help them survive those long harsh winters better? If so, to what extent is the increased survival affecting the mortality rate of the deer herd? Does this increased nutrition cause the fawn survival rate to go up? If so, how much? Is it skewing natural dynamics? Does this event send those biological triggers, often conveniently talked up by animal rights groups and predator advocates, that “cause” deer to produce more as part of their reproductive rates?

There are many things to be considered with this extent of deer feeding. Probably we are left with more questions than answer. However, when we consider what we are being told about habitat and deer mortality rates etc., we might be looking at two different consequences of deer feeding. One consequence might be that we are seeing more deer added each year to the total deer population, or perhaps at least in those areas where deer feeding is more concentrated. Are we? Have we received any word from the biologists in charge of deer management that the population is actually growing? Maybe word from observations from those who feed deer can tell us if they are feeding more deer each year. I would think they ought to know. Don’t they count them? Does the harvest data indicate that the population of deer might be going up?

If none of this is actually happening, then it would be sensible to ask just what the condition of the deer herd would be without any supplemental feeding.

If you think about all these things, then one has to wonder if law makers and game managers are making too big a deal out of feeding deer. Is it really hurting in any way? Yes, there are concerns over spreading of disease, but is there an equitable concern for disease and virus spread throughout the landscape of all wildlife? If Chronic Wasting Disease was found in Maine, I’m positive the state would immediately implement all necessary actions to curb the spread. Supplemental feeding isn’t going to cause CWD, but it might contribute to spreading the disease.

We should probably ask ourselves how significant changes in feed and habitat, quality and quantity, are to the management of our wildlife. Is it like we are being told?

I think supplemental feeding of at least one quarter of the total deer herd is significant. I also believe this activity has contributed to the survival and reproduction of more deer. With that said, what would the state of the deer herd be today without the years of supplemental feeding?

Share

Deer, wolves, and people: costs, benefits and challenges of living together

ABSTRACT

Human?driven species annihilations loom as a major crisis. However the recovery of deer and wolf populations in many parts of the northern hemisphere has resulted in conflicts and controversies rather than in relief. Both species interact in complex ways with their environment, each other, and humans. We review these interactions in the context of the ecological and human costs and benefits associated with these species. We integrate scattered information to widen our perspective on the nature and perception of these costs and benefits and how they link to each other and ongoing controversies regarding how we manage deer and wolf populations. After revisiting the ecological roles deer and wolves play in contemporary ecosystems, we explore how they interact, directly and indirectly, with human groups including farmers, foresters, shepherds, and hunters. Interactions with deer and wolves generate various axes of tension, posing both ecological and sociological challenges. Resolving these tensions and conflicts requires that we address key questions using integrative approaches: what are the ecological consequences of deer and wolf recovery? How do they influence each other? What are the social and socio?ecological consequences of large deer populations and wolf presence? Finally, what key obstacles must be overcome to allow deer, wolves and people to coexist? Reviewing contemporary ecological and sociological results suggests insights and ways to improve our understanding and resolve long?standing challenges to coexistence. We should begin by agreeing to enhance aggregate benefits while minimizing the collective costs we incur by interacting with deer and wolves. We should also view these species, and ourselves, as parts of integrated ecosystems subject to long?term dynamics. If co?existence is our goal, we need deer and wolves to persevere in ways that are compatible with human interests. Our human interests, however, should be inclusive and fairly value all the costs and benefits deer and wolves entail including their intrinsic value. Shifts in human attitudes and cultural learning that are already occurring will reshape our ecological interactions with deer and wolves.

For access to the full report, follow this link.

Share

Bloomberg: Ultra Fascist

Most envision the false Left vs. Right paradigm as a straight line, a continuum, with Leftism on the left and Rightism on the right. I have contended for years that even this continuum is misrepresented; that it’s actually a circle. That’s how we should be seeing this vain shit show. If the Left goes far enough to the left, they eventually reach an existence once thought to be held by ultra rightists – fascists. If the Right goes far enough to the right, they eventually will overtake Fascism and wind up in a communist dictatorship rule situation. Left and Right pass each other and actually end up assuming each other’s past political ideology. Think about it.

Welcome to the 21st Century, where some on the Left have gone so far as to become fascists. Such is the case of Michael Bloomberg.

It should be apparent, but isn’t, that when, on those rare mistakes, a politician screws up and gets caught doing and saying things that represent their real persons instead of the liars they make believe they are for election purposes and how they present themselves to the public.

The latest screw up for Bloomberg seems to be some audio that has shown up of him addressing the Aspen Institute (BUT DON’T GO LOOK, at who and what the Aspen Institute is all about. It might reveal some more truths…if you can handle the truth.) in 2015 where he appears to be supporting his “Stop and Frisk” fascist law he enforced as mayor of New York City.

Mind you, the Rightist press (because all press is controlled by the same ultra fascist Global Power Structure) is attempting to present Bloomberg’s comments as being “racist,” and little more. What a convenient distraction.

Here are some of the comments that can be found in the article I linked to above:

“Ninety-five percent of murders, murderers and murder victims fit one M.O. You can just take a description, Xerox it, and pass it out to all the cops.”

“They are male, minorities, 16 to 25. That’s true in New York, that’s true in virtually every city (inaudible). And that’s where the real crime is. You’ve got to get the guns out of the hands of people that are getting killed.

“So one of the unintended consequences is people say, ‘Oh my God, you are arresting kids for marijuana that are all minorities.’ Yes, that’s true. Why? Because we put all the cops in minority neighborhoods. Why do we do it? Because that’s where all the crime is.”

“And the way you get the guns out of the kids’ hands is to throw them up against the wall and frisk them … And then they start … ‘Oh, I don’t want to get caught,’ so they don’t bring the gun. They still have a gun, but they leave it at home.”

“If you can stop them from getting murdered, I would argue everything else you do is less important.”

Today, Bloomberg is trying to walk back his racist/fascist comments by saying that he was “totally focused on saving lives,” that he thought destroying the rule of law was necessary from his perspective.

There’s a certain degree of argument that can be made by flat out stating that fighting real crime is fighting real crime. And, if it so happens that fighting that crime brings law enforcement into minority neighbors or the high rent districts, then such as it is. But is that what’s really going on here?

Fighting crime is one thing. Treading all over privileges that, in past recent history have been supported, presents a brand new problem that cannot be exposed when the press insists that the Obama approach to pulling the racist card is more effective than calling a spade a spade.

Any government official with enough power and control to disregard previous adherence to such privileges as due process, illegal searches and seizures, willing to willy-nilly stop someone and, “throw them up against the wall and frisk,” in my opinion is pressing the actions of a fascist on his way to dictatorial rule under the oppressive strong arm of communism. This, I would consider ultra fascism. When we see such actions, we should be asking ourselves, what else is this man capable of doing or any person of the “Posterity” who understands the Constitution they know and not the one we have been lied about its meaning?

For the same reason, when Donald Trump made comments after the Florida school shooting to “take away their guns and worry about Due Process later,” an honest question might be to ask in what direction is this country going and someone please tell me who is on whose side? Have both ends of the political spectrum actually gone full circle and both have met at the fascist meeting house?

Instead of burying your head in the sand, why don’t you pull it out and look around and search for the truth of what is going on. Things are NOT as they might appear. If you are so immersed emotionally in your preferred false Left and Right vain shit show that you cannot see the truth that is being presented, I will say that I think you are in trouble.

Share

When Robots Take Over

Have you ever wondered what would happen WHEN Marshal Law was declared and law enforcement (people) were told to go and confiscate or arrest/control masses of people? Did you ever wondered if those military or police people could actually carry out the task of arresting or shooting other people?

Wonder no more. Those “people” will not have to do it. The governments will send out their regiments of drones armed with loudspeakers, cameras, microphones for eavesdropping, weapons; biological weapons, chemical weapons, guns, lasers, whatever the incident calls for.

Below is video taken by a drone in China, sent out to tell people to get into their houses and off the street, because of a man-caused “pandemic” Coronavirus.

What will the drones, at the control of some government official, do when someone refuses to obey their orders? I have an idea we will find out sooner than later.

Share