June 24, 2017

Same Private Corporate Owners of U.S. Own Russia

So for more than 2000 years now the Devil huffed and puffed ’till he blew his disguise clean off and stands revealed as Rome…

Russia of course being their backup power in case the U.S. turns on them.. Which has not happened..

From ThereIsNoDebt Appendices;

Countries are and can only be sea states / coastal states –

27th July 2015

Rosja: opublikowano now? wersj? doktryny morskiej pa?stwa
http://wiadomosci.onet.pl/swiat/rosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa/sxhk3f

Google translator:

Russia: it published a new version of the doctrine of sea state
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=auto&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fwiadomosci.onet.pl%2Fswiat%2Frosja-opublikowano-nowa-wersje-doktryny-morskiej-panstwa%2Fsxhk3f&edit-text=

What constitutes the country of The Federation of Russia is given to mean –

July 27 2001

“The Constitution of the Russian Federation, Federal laws and other legal acts
of the Russian Federation, the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea as of 1982,
international treaties in the domain of the sea activity and use of the resources and
spaces of the World Ocean shall constitute the legal basis of the Sea Doctrine.”

– I. GENERAL PROVISIONS, 1st paragraph, page 2

Download Source:

SEA DOCTRINE OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION
for the period till 2020
(approved by the President of the Russian Federation on July 27 2001; Order No. 1387)
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=3&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CC0QFjACahUKEwiw7b77tvvGAhXDa3IKHYXEBSA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.dcaf.ch%2Fcontent%2Fdownload%2F36021%2F527259%2Ffile%2FBM_Arbatov_07_Doctrine_Sea.pdf&ei=xDO2VbD7OMPXyQOFiZeAAg&usg=AFQjCNFBWyZKmRt0FY_8fouzAMAMbv50ZA&bvm=bv.98717601,d.bGQ

Reference Material:

THERE IS NO OTHER WAY TO SAY THIS
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/06/15/there-is-no-other-way-to-say-this/

~

Having learnt that President Putin of the Federation of Russia has made amendments to the ‘Naval Doctrine of Russia’, known also as the ‘Maritime Doctorine’ or ‘Sea Doctrine’, what is of interest, is whether the amendments made change in any way the definition for the Federation of Russia (Russia) as being –

i) a personally owned private fictitious (copywritten) corporate country in the ownership of the Self-Ennobling Ones, which would be the only significant change of any real meaning, or

ii) whether the pretense of countries being independent from each other continues, although

iii) their definitions and copyright reveal that they most certainly do not represent the interests of people to be found in the physical world of the five senses, but that they are the private intellectual property (creations of the mind) of those who directly created them or had them created indirectly by their representatives

Comparison of :

– the definition for the Russian Federation given by, ‘The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)’, with that of

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea, and

– the definition of the Russian Federation given by the Russian state

~

Definition for the Russian Federation given by, The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO)

The Definition of the Russian Federation, paragraph 5 –

“The legal basis for maritime doctrine consists of the Constitution of Russian Federation, federal
laws and other regulatory legal acts of the Russian Federation, the United Nations Convention on
the Law of the Sea of 1982, international treaties in the field of maritime activity, the use of
space resources and the oceans.”

– I. General Provisions, 5th paragraph, page 1

Source:

APPROVED
President
Russian Federation
Vladimir Putin
27 July 2001,
Pr-1387
Maritime Doctrine of Russian Federation 2020
http://www.oceanlaw.org/downloads/arctic/Russian_Maritime_Policy_2020.pdf

Source of Origination:

The Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans (ROLCO) –
A Service of the Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans
http://www.oceanlaw.org/

~

Parties and Non-Parties to the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/parties-and-non-parties-los-convention

Text of the LOS Convention
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/text-los-convention

~

ROLCO Members –

Members and Leadership of the

Rule of Law Committee for the Oceans

Steering Committee:

Alton Frye
Caitlyn Antrim

Executive Director:

Caitlyn Antrim

Members:

John Bellinger, Arnold and Porter; Legal Adviser, Department of State 2005-09

William Brewer, (retired) General Counsel, NOAA, Representative of the Secretary of Commerce to the UN Conference on the Law of the Sea

David Caron, Dean, The Dickson Poon School of Law, King’s College London

Patricia Forkan, President (emeritus) Humane Society International

Alton Frye, Council on Foreign Relations (ret)

Lee A. Kimball, Consultant

John Knauss, Administrator of NOAA and Under Secretary of Commerce for Oceans and Atmosphere, 1989-1993

Edward Miles, Professor emeritus, School of Marine and Environmental Affairs, University of Washington

Thomas R. Pickering, Under Secretary of State for Political Affairs 1999-2000, US Representative to the United Nations 1989-1992

RAdm. Horace B. Robertson, JAGC, USN (Ret.), Judge Advocate General of the Navy, 1975-1976

David Rockefeller Jr., Philanthropist

Biliana Cicin-Sain, Professor, School of Marine Affairs, University of Delaware

Harry Scheiber Professor of Law, University of California School of Law; Director, Law of the Sea Institute

William H. Taft, IV, Deputy Secretary of Defense 1984-1989, Legal Adviser, US Department of State 2001-2005

John C. Whitehead, Deputy Secretary of State, 1985-89

Adm. Paul A. Yost USCG (Ret.), Commandant, US Cost Guard 1986-1990

Source:

ROLCO Members
http://www.oceanlaw.org/content/rolco-members

~

Additional –

January 10, 2015
Russia Overhauls Military Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/policy-budget/policy/2015/01/10/russia-military-doctrine-ukraine-putin/21441759/

Definition of the Russian Federation relating to the Russian military doctrine, paragraph 3 –

3. The legal basis of the Military Doctrine consists of the Russian
Federation Constitution; the generally recognized principles and norms of
international law and Russian Federation treaties in the field of defence,
arms control, and disarmament; federal constitutional laws; federal laws; and
also statutory legal acts of the Russian Federation president and the Russian
Federation Government.

Source:

Text of newly-approved Russian military doctrine
Text of report by Russian presidential website on 5 February
[“The Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation” approved by Russian
Federation presidential edict on 5 February 2010]
http://carnegieendowment.org/files/2010russia_military_doctrine.pdf

____

Definition of the Russian Federation given by the UN Convention on the Law of the Sea

Link: Text of the 1982 Convention and 1994 Agreement

Definition of Countries given by the United Nations, from bullet pointed paragraph 6 of the preamble, reads –

Desiring by this Convention to develop the principles embodied in resolution 2749 (XXV) of 17 December 1970 in which the General Assembly of the United Nations solemnly declared inter alia that the area of the seabed and ocean floor and the subsoil thereof, beyond the limits of national jurisdiction, as well as its resources, are the common heritage of mankind, the exploration and exploitation of which shall be carried out for the benefit of mankind as a whole, irrespective of the geographical location of States,

Source:

UNITED NATIONS CONVENTION ON THE LAW OF THE SEA
AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE IMPLEMENTATION OF
PART XI OF THE CONVENTION
PREAMBLE
http://www.un.org/depts/los/convention_agreements/texts/unclos/closindx.htm

____

Definition of the Federation of Russia given by the Russian state and government –

30 November 1998,
in agreement with Italy –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation and, when used in a geographical sense means its territory, including internal waters and territorial sea, air space over them as well as exclusive economic zone and continental shelf where the Russian Federation has sovereign rights and exercises jurisdiction in conformity with the international and federal law;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/italy.pdf

27 August 1998
in agreement with the Netherlands –

“the Russian Federation” means its territory as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf as defind in its legislation subject to the 1982 UN Law of the Sea Convention;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/netherlands.pdf

22 May 2014
in agreement with Malta –

the term “Russia” means the Russian Federation, when used in geographical sense, means all the territory of the Russian Federation and also its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined according to the UN Convention on the law of the seas (1982);
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/Malta_e.pdf

5 May 2005
in agreement with Lithuania –

the term “the Russian Federation”, when used in the geographical sense, means the territory of the Russian Federation as well as its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf, defined in accordance with the international law, including the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/lithuania.pdf

19 January 2009
in agreement with Venezuela –

the term “the Russian Federation (Russia)” means the territory of the Russian Federation and includes its exclusive economic zone and continental shelf;
http://www.nalog.ru/html/sites/www.eng.nalog.ru/treaties/venezuela.pdf

Sourced:

Applicable Double Taxation Treaties
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/dta/

SOURCED:

The Russian Government – Federal Taxation Service
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/1.html

International Cooperation
http://www.nalog.ru/eng/international_cooperation/

____

From news sources :

Definition of the Russian Federation approved by Vladimir Putin (new Maritime Doctrine) –

26 July, 2015

Paragraph 5:

“It is above all a change of the international situation, the situation in the world and, of course, the strengthening of our country as a maritime power,”

Paragraph 6:

The six regional areas – is the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian Sea, the Indian Ocean and Antarctica.

Paragraph 7:

Focuses on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. “Atlantic – due to the fact that in recent times is fairly active development of the North Atlantic Alliance and its approach to our borders, to which, of course, the Russian Federation is your answer,” – said Deputy Prime Minister. “The second point is related to the fact that Crimea and Sevastopol reunited with the Russian Federation, and it is necessary to take measures for speedy integration into the economic activity of the Crimea and Sevastopol. And of course, the restoration of the presence of the Russian navy in the Mediterranean Sea“, – he added.

Paragraph 8:

“As for the Arctic, it is caused by several events,” – continued Rogozin.

“In addition, the Arctic for us – it is a free access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans are not limited by anything. And of course, the very richness of the continental shelf that requires careful attention to the development of” – he said.

Paragraph 9:

Particular emphasis is placed in the Marine doctrine on environmental issues. “Because it is important for us not only to develop wealth, but also to preserve them for future generations,” – said the official.

Paragraph 11:

An important part of the doctrine regard to governance issues of maritime activity. It outlined the role of the Marine Board of the Government, verified the competence of other authorities. So now you can start building a list of all the documents planning of maritime activities of the state.

English translations:

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

Vladimir Putin approved a new Maritime Doctrine
https://translate.googleusercontent.com/translate_c?depth=1&hl=en&ie=UTF8&prev=_t&rurl=translate.google.com&sl=ru&tl=en&u=http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html&usg=ALkJrhjuubBR_tATb1sy1qjVT7qqrmm4MQ

Primary Sourcing:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

NEW EDITION OF MARITIME DOCUMENT FOR THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION

* New definition for the Russian Federation given in 45 page document –

link: the edition of the Maritime Doctrine
http://static.kremlin.ru/media/events/files/ru/uAFi5nvux2twaqjftS5yrIZUVTJan77L.pdf

Source:

???????? ????? ??????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://www.rg.ru/2015/07/26/doctrina-site.html

~

From Russian state sources :

Definition of Russia taken from the minutes for the new Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation –

Russian Federation Marine Doctrine

Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

July 26, 2015 16:00Baltiisk
Vladimir Putin held a meeting to discuss the new draft of Russia’s Marine Doctrine.

The meeting took place on board the frigate Admiral of the Soviet Navy Gorshkov. Participants included Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin, Defence Minister Sergei Shoigu, Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov, and Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov.

* * *

President of Russia Vladimir Putin: Colleagues, good afternoon.

We have been updating the Russian Federation’s Marine Doctrine. This very complex document’s main aim is to provide our country with an integral, consistent and effective naval policy that will protect Russia’s interests.

The Doctrine has been drafted and approved. This is a big event for our future navy, and for developing our shipbuilding industry, because the main customer – the navy in this case, and the Defence Ministry – formulate their future needs, and the industry must carry out these tasks. Industry adapts to new tasks depending on the needs formulated.

Let me note that for the first time, the Doctrine also includes provisions of a purely social nature. They cover marine medicine, and provisions for improving the health of sailors and the specialists working in the marine field. This is very important. People need to know that from now on, our strategic documents for developing our country’s fleet and navy will address the social aspect too, and will give people what they expect from their service, as they carry out the tasks that face our country today in this very complex and important area.

Let’s now discuss in more detail the Doctrine’s key provisions. Mr Rogozin, you have the floor.

Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin: Thank you.

Mr President,

This new draft of the Russian Federation Marine Doctrine is a fundamental document of key importance, setting out our country’s naval policy. In other words, it is one of our country’s strategic planning documents.

The Russian Government’s Marine Board undertook the document’s drafting, with the navy playing the leading role in this work. In all, 15 federal executive agencies and organisations took part in drafting the new Doctrine.

We proposed making changes to the Marine Doctrine adopted back in 2001 for the period through to 2020 for two reasons: above all, the changing international situation; and, of course, strengthening Russia’s position as a sea power.

The Marine Doctrine covers four functional areas and six regional areas. The four functional areas are naval activity, marine transport, marine science, and mineral resources development. The six regional areas are the Atlantic, Arctic, Pacific, Caspian, and Indian Ocean, and we have added Antarctica, as a fair number of events involving Antarctica have taken place of late and this region is of considerable interest to Russia.

The main focus is on two areas: the Arctic and the Atlantic. The reasons for this are the following. We emphasise the Atlantic because NATO has been developing actively of late and coming closer to our borders, and Russia is of course responding to these developments.

The second reason is that Crimea and Sevastopol have been reunited with Russia and we need to take measures for their rapid integration into the national economy. Of course, we are also restoring Russia’s naval presence in the Mediterranean.

As for the Arctic, several events motivate our decision. One is the growing importance of the North Sea Route. Mr President, I reported to you that we have begun work on building a new fleet of atomic-powered icebreakers. Three new atomic icebreakers will be ready for work accompanying ships along the northern route in 2017, 2019, and 2020. Furthermore, the Arctic also assures us free and unhindered access to the Atlantic and Pacific oceans. Then there are the riches of the continental shelf, the development of which calls for an attentive approach.

The Marine Doctrine pays particular attention to environmental issues too, because it is important for us not only to develop these riches, but also to preserve them for future generations.

The Marine Doctrine contains a new section on shipbuilding. This is to a large extent linked to the fact that over these last 10–15 years, we have developed a shipbuilding industry that in terms of naval shipbuilding is doing work on a scale comparable to what was happening during the Soviet period. As for civilian and commercial shipbuilding, we are taking measures to encourage the establishment of private shipbuilding companies, which have demonstrated successful results.

State management of marine activities is an important part of the Marine Doctrine. This section stresses the role of the Government’s Marine Board and clarifies the powers of the other state agencies. Essentially, once you approved the Marine Doctrine, we will be able to start drafting the whole list of planning documents for our country’s marine activities in the short, medium and long term.

That concludes my report.

Vladimir Putin: Are there any comments or questions?

Commander of the Navy Viktor Chirkov: Mr President,

Let me thank you for this Marine Doctrine’s timely drafting and approval. This is a timely document. It places responsibility on us for its future implementation, and we have already begun this process.

Vladimir Putin: Mr Sidorov, what is the situation with coordination between the army and the navy?

Commander of the Western Military District Anatoly Sidorov: Mr President, it is hard to talk about coordination when everything works as single whole and unified command. As far as the tasks before us are concerned, the Baltic Fleet is resolving everything together with the Western Military District’s forces.

Regarding the delimitation of certain powers between the naval chief command and the Western Military District’s command, there is full coordination in this area.

Vladimir Putin: Good, thank you.

Primary Sourcing:

* Maritime Doctrine of the Russian Federation
http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Primary Sourcing english translation:

* Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/50060

Text format:
Russian Federation Marine Doctrine
2015-07-26 16:00:00
Baltiisk
http://en.kremlin.ru/events/president/news/copy/50060

~

Additional news reference –

28.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://www.strategic-culture.org/news/2015/07/28/antagonizing-interpretation-new-russian-maritime-doctrine-misguided.html

____

Results of Comparisons –

The amendments made for the definition of the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious corporate country of the Russian Federation, under the partial executive direction of their president, Vladimir Vladimirovich Putin, has at best extended their ‘claims’ of owner-ship to include a greater range of maritime (sea) territory than previously defined, corresponding with accompanying ‘claims’ to those natural resources to be found in the waters (seas), the sea-bed and subsoil of those newly defined maritime territories.

____

Conclusion for Comparisons –

The new definition for the Russian Federation, has partially contravened and violated Natural Laws jurisdictional requirements of exclusivity, insofar as the state and government of the Russian Federation quite rightly continue not to make any claims to having authority over the living, who cannot be ordinarily found to reside in the territories of the dead, and who are not subject to man-made laws where the living are to be found in the physical world of the five senses.

This new definition for the Russian Federation is in accord with the historic and current definitions for states and their countries.

____

Further News – relating to Russia and the Law of the Sea

30 July 2012
Vladimir Putin signs law on the Northern Sea Route
http://www.arctic-info.com/news/30-07-2012/vladimir-putin-signs-law-on-the-northern-sea-route

* July 26, 2015
Russia Revises Navy Doctrine
http://www.defensenews.com/story/defense/international/europe/2015/07/26/russia-revises-navy-doctrine/30705553/

07/26/2015
Vladimir Putin approved a new maritime doctrine
https://translate.google.com/translate?sl=ru&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=http%3A%2F%2Fkommersant.ru%2Fdoc%2F2776754&edit-text=

Source:

???????? ????? ???????? ????? ??????? ????????
http://kommersant.ru/doc/2776754

July 26 2015
Deputy PM: Putin approves addendums to Sea Doctrine
http://tass.ru/en/russia/810815

26.07.2015
Russian Maritime Doctrine Lays Foundation to New Marine Law
http://sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1025068628.html

26.07.2015
Russian President Vladimir Putin announced the approval of a new version of Russia’s Maritime Doctrine, Deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin said Sunday.
http://in.sputniknews.com/russia/20150726/1015217869.html

27.07.2015
Antagonizing Interpretation of New Russian Maritime Doctrine Misguided
http://sputniknews.com/europe/20150727/1025103129.html

July 27, 2015
Putin’s Maritime Doctrine: Atlantic is the new Black Sea
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/putins-naval-doctrine-atlantic-is-new.html

July 27, 2015
Changes to Russia’s Naval Doctrine
http://fortruss.blogspot.com/2015/07/changes-to-russias-naval-doctrine.html

27.07.2015
Russian navy to focus on energy-rich Arctic, Atlantic oceans
http://www.dw.com/en/russian-navy-to-focus-on-energy-rich-arctic-atlantic-oceans/a-18609091

Xinhua, July 27, 2015
Russia updates maritime doctrine, criticizing NATO expansion
http://www.china.org.cn/world/2015-07/27/content_36153005.htm

Jul 27, 2015
New naval doctrine, French MPs in Crimea and another NGO leaves Russia
http://www.russia-direct.org/russian-media/new-naval-doctrine-french-mps-crimea-and-another-ngo-leaves-russia

____

Reference Material

Pilot projects on maritime spatial planning in the Russian Federation
https://www.google.pl/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=9&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0CEwQFjAIahUKEwjtke6_iYbHAhVGgXIKHXazBbk&url=http%3A%2F%2Fbullmaritimeinstitute.com%2Ffulltxt.php%3FICID%3D1158321&ei=fci7Va3fGMaCygP25pbICw&usg=AFQjCNGYuKTApjFitk_5YdYsTdzhXGOnzA&bvm=bv.99261572,d.bGQ

http://www.un.org/ru/publications/pdfs/national%20human%20development%20report%20in%20the%20russian%20federation%202010.pdf

page 93, Chapter 10, The Environmental Component of the National Maritime Policy of the Russian Federation in the Arctic Ocean,
publication: Environmental Security in the Arctic Ocean
edited by Paul Arthur Berkman, Alexander N. Vylegzhanin
https://books.google.pl/books?id=0k26BQAAQBAJ&pg=PR3&dq=Environmental+Security+in+the+Arctic+Ocean+edited+by+Paul+Arthur+Berkman,+Alexander+N.+Vylegzhanin&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CCAQ6AEwAGoVChMI-KiD8YyGxwIV5sByCh2E8AfR#v=onepage&q=Environmental%20Security%20in%20the%20Arctic%20Ocean%20edited%20by%20Paul%20Arthur%20Berkman%2C%20Alexander%20N.%20Vylegzhanin&f=false

RUSSIAN STRATEGIES
IN THE ARCTIC:
AVOIDING A NEW COLD WAR
Moscow, September 2014
http://www.uarctic.org/media/857300/arctic_eng.pdf

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rossiyskaya_Gazeta

Reference source:

Rossiyskaya Gazeta
http://www.rg.ru/

Share

The Crown Of The Caesars Passes To The Papacy

The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy –

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

Share

It’s Official Because Ida Lupine Says So

“while the endless boards and agencies{ANY WESTERN STATES WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT WHERE WOLVES ARE HARASSING RURAL RESIDENTS} may have great credentials, many of those they cater to{WHERE WOLVES ARE HARASSING RANCHERS-HUNTERS-FARMERS} are lowlifes, who won’t even cooperate with F&W{FALSE FACTS BASED} recommendations”

FACTS CAN BE FALSE

Suppose the scientists behind these recommendations based on those alleged “facts” were corrupt, politically biased, paid to rig these conclusions; and thus directed false science, thus establishing false “Facts”, and overawed the followers of their false facts who are also politically biased; or omitted factual scientific data which would alter the false facts against their final conclusions, or observations by rural ranching hunting public lands multiple users such as myself or others that counter their false facts (as in Effect is the case); That would be enough to render the false facts scientific Verdict by those anti ranching grazing hunting who are evidently totally morally corrupt…. Liars and cheats.. Oops, only lowlifes would point towards omitted factual data contrary to what the Ida’s of this society want to be true even if it is not..

It’s the same old con game over lands and resources wealth just using different words and terms.. Obviously This idiot calling others lowlifes is fooled by the false facts.. In FACT we’ve all been fooled by it.. It is a FACT that I have known false facts and false men, too. It is not a new thing.. It has been going on all down through the ages of our recorded history.. So discerning when scientists or lawyers or judges or politicians assert facts, when false facts are intended is very important when one chooses to go down a path attacking others livelihoods and culture.. If one had a conscience that is.. I’ve discovered the pantheists have no conscience at all..

This Ida from an eastern state has no clue of what she opines about daily.. If she knows more about the western estates several thousand miles from her immediate environment than those of us inhabiting these western estates I suppose we could the assume she is an authority on what is correctly or incorrectly happening or not correctly or incorrectly  happening all over the rest of the earth because she’s omniscient.. She likely knows I haven’t mowed my lawn for a week now..

Signed another Idaho Lowlife that appreciates wolf management because I’ve observed what fully protected populations of wolves did and do.. And what those over protected wolves did was unacceptable and morally disgusting.

Those lowlifes claims coming from her being quite lacking of factual information herself is hilarious when we’ve seen the filth and misinformation coming out of her pie hole for years now.. Along with hiding out in echo chambers where she never has to face contrary factual evidence that proves she is incorrect.. About environmental scientism couched in legal terms and double speak.. The Ida’s of this society have at best a tiny bit of truth buried in hate and misinformation of which she has not the capacity to validate nor prove the difference between pseudo science and real science. Trying to conceptualize definitions of a general nature to assist discovery of the facts as they are and not as she wishes those alleged facts to be are beyond her intellectual capacity..

Thinking they see the light with their eyes wide shut..While calling decent hard working people lowlifes..

No doubt even people on the other side of this issue would like it if Ida shut the hell up…

Guess what Ida? You’re a bitch. And A stupid one at that.

Share

Murkowski Applauds New Secretarial Order on Sage Grouse

Press Release from Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources:

U.S. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, today expressed her support for the secretarial order signed by Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke to improve sage grouse conservation and strengthen consultation between the federal government and western states.

Secretarial Order 3353 establishes an internal review team to evaluate and make recommendations on the land use plans finalized in 2015 that address conservation of the sage grouse and its habitat. The review will also consider local economic growth and job creation.

“I applaud Secretary Zinke for directing Interior to evaluate the land management policies aimed at protecting the sage grouse to ensure that the input of the 11 impacted western states is properly considered,” Murkowski said. “Cooperation between the federal, state, and local governments will produce a better result for the citizens and species that depend on our public lands.”

Murkowski is the chairman of the Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources. More information about the new Secretarial Orders is available here.

Share

$20 Billion Paid Out for Sue and Settle Equal Access to Justice Act

Many of us have complained for years about the ridiculous amounts of money taxpayers have been on the hook for when environmental groups inundate the Department of Interior, specifically the Department of Fish and Wildlife, for the purpose of putting the Federal Government in a position where they have no option but to settle lawsuits for large sums of money.

In a letter to Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke from Raul Labrador, chairman of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, (shown below) the committee is seeking a list of all suits settled between January 1, 2016 until January 19, 2017 (during the final year of President Barack Obama) in order to get some explanation as to why there was an much higher than normal number of lawsuits settled and paid for, in addition to the amount of money paid out by taxpayers…as much as $20 billion.

But don’t get your hopes up that we now have an administration that is going to crack down on this way of life for many who pad their coffers quite easily by employing the methods allowed by law. This administration has already proven itself as being quite dysfunctional, while creating a great smoke screen of blather, causing the blind followers to pay attention to the blather and not discover the actual results.

2017-06-07_labrador_to_zinke_re_doi_settlements
Share

QDMA Whitetail Deer Report for 2016

Below is the link to the 2016 Quality Deer Management Association Report on whitetail deer. Bear in mind a couple of things. One, I am not a very big fan of QDMA for various reasons. One reason is because I believe they put too much focus on “trophy” hunting and manipulating the resource towards that end. Another issue to consider, should you choose to review this report, is that it is a great example of the saying, “Statistic prove that statistics can prove anything.” While QDMA is presenting information about declines and increases in yearling buck harvest and/or buck harvest in general, as well as antlerless deer, it offers no explanations of why. It’s one thing to report declines or increases in yearling buck harvest, for example, even to go to the point of suggesting trends, but to make specific claims requires much greater knowledge and information about all aspects that effect deer management and hunting harvests.

One might suspect that with QDMA’s insistent pushing for antler point restrictions (for trophy hunting purposes), it would seem logical that the buck harvest might decrease when such restrictions are put in place. The same kind of unknown comparison can be applied to reports in changes of antlerless deer. In states, like Maine, that use “Any-Deer Permits” to regulate the populations of deer, significant changes in the allotment of such permits, as has been the case in recent years, obviously affects the harvest data.

That isn’t to say the report is worthless. It contains interesting data and if taken in its context and applied subjectively and honestly, within the smallest denominator of available data in each state, one might find some interesting comparatives, assuming most things remain consistent…and they don’t.

QDMA’s Whitetail Report 2016

Share

Secretary Ryan Zinke Appoints Utah’s Greg Sheehan as the Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service

Press Release from the Department of Interior:

WASHINGTON – U.S. Secretary of the Interior Ryan Zinke today announced the appointment of Greg Sheehan to the newly-created position of Deputy Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Prior to his appointment, Sheehan served as Director of the Utah Division of Wildlife Service. Sheehan has more than 25 years of experience with the State of Utah working in wildlife and natural resource management.

“We are grateful to have Greg Sheehan join our team and help lead USFWS as we advance a pro-conservation and more collaborative agenda at the Department,” said Secretary Zinke. “His experience and proven record in wildlife service as well as his organizational management skills will be an invaluable asset to the Service and the Department.”

On his appointment, Mr. Sheehan said, “I am thrilled to have an opportunity to work with Secretary Zinke and the great team at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. I look forward to helping promote the fish and wildlife resources in America through collaborative partnerships with states, local government, the sportsmen’s community, and others.”

Prior to joining the State of Utah, Sheehan worked with the Air Force for six years as a civilian, where his focus was on correcting inefficiencies in cost and pricing between the Air Force and major DoD government contractors. Sheehan is a lifelong hunter, angler, and aspiring wildlife photographer. Sheehan will begin in mid-June and will serve as the Acting Director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service until a Director is nominated by the President and confirmed by the Senate.

Share

Money vs Currency

Share

What About Confederate Brigadier General Albert Pike’s Statue At D.C. Judicial Square????

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brigadier_General_Albert_Pike

 

Share

Dysfunctional USFWS Appoints Deputy Director

*Editor’s Comment* -While it appears the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) is so dysfunctional it cannot appoint a director to the Service some 5 months after Trump took over in Washington, oddly it seems to have opted to appoint a deputy director to stand in as an interim director until such time as the Trump administration finishes their plundering and mistake-ridden attempts to make people think they will make things better. Time will tell. Isn’t this kind of like putting the cart before the horse?

The information provided says that Sheehan “has been named” but it doesn’t say by whom. Is it Interior Director Zinke who named him? And if he named him, why can’t he name a director and isn’t it a better idea for the director to name his own deputies?

There is no information posted on the USFWS website about this appointment. So far it appears as though we can expect very little from this administration as it pertains to Department of Interior and USFWS issues. If it is taking more than 5 months to appoint a director to the Service, how many years will it take them to carry out other important issues within the Service?

Where there is no vision, the people perish!

From the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation:

MISSOULA, Mont.—Greg Sheehan, director of Utah’s Division of Wildlife Resources, has been named deputy director of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS) and as its acting director until one is nominated and confirmed.

“RMEF is pleased to endorse a wildlife professional who supports and understands the issues we face in the American West with wildlife,” said David Allen, RMEF president and CEO. “We are pleased to work with Greg and the FWS to secure a better future for our wildlife, hunters and the general public.”

Sheehan served as director of the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources since 2012. A long-time RMEF member, he spent the last 25 years in the natural resources and wildlife management sector. Sheehan has a track record of helping to restore various fish and wildlife species to levels not seen in more than 125 years.

Additionally, Sheehan’s past highlights a focus on advocating for shooting sports, understanding sensitive species issues and working to recruit, retain and reactivate hunters and anglers.

“We appreciate that Greg is a proponent of state management authority and predator management for the benefit of all wildlife. We also appreciate his passion for the outdoors and the outdoor lifestyle as he is an avid hunter, angler, wildlife photographer and advocate of RMEF’s conservation mission.”

Share