November 21, 2017

How To Disagree or Agree With Another Man or Woman In This World

How do you disagree with someone else? Do you simply disagree with what they shared and said? Or do you validate the legal historical record and get into some word search term search etymology research and then either agree or disagree based on that evidence? Or do you simply trust your core beliefs.. Yet perhaps you never validated those core beliefs… Perhaps most if not all core beliefs are false beliefs.. I had to let go of almost all of my core beliefs because it turned out those were false beliefs.. Most people are so convinced their core beliefs are the truth that cognitive dissonance rather than investigation of those beliefs kicks in… Most core beliefs cannot stand the light of day.. Besides all of the political, scientific, philosophical, historical fairy tales going on all around us from birth until death we have the various levels of double speak, reverse language, Hegelian Dialectical… Now in my read searching words and terms of this legal establishment I’ve discovered there is another level of twisted speak that goes beyond double speak.. I’m going to call that triple and fourple speak… Or double speak on top of double speak on top of double speak… Worse the creator of words and terms can play at making any of those words and terms mean whatever they say they mean at any given time in order to preserve their authority over the rest of us scratching our heads trying to comprehend exactly what they mean or meant then now and even later on… The liar of this world has been taking lying to amazing levels of deception… Basically a deception so massive it is incomprehensible to the majority of people, most of whom are not even paying attention..I’m beginning to think that even the deceivers managing their world system don’t know exactly what they really mean either.. Perhaps Heavenly Father really does have a sense of humor and he is simply playing them like the fools they are.. After all most of the garbage they shell out through their official mouth pieces tends to cause me to laugh at them, almost hysterically.. Because they are hysterical crazy fools losing control of their own deceptions.. There is a big difference between belief and know… Same as between black and white..

Share

It’s Always Left Against Right….or Something

After the fake shooting in Texas, as always, the debate over gun control carries on, as ignorant voices claim the high ground, pretending to exude their vast knowledge of history, rights, liberalism, conservatism, progressivism and anything that embellishes the divide and conquer meme so prevalent and yet seemingly impossible to see  – another display of the attributes of the Hegelian Dialectic.

Life in the United States is 100% relegated to the false paradigm of Left and Right. The paradigm is fake but the minds of those who blindly follow either side exemplify the success of the created crises, the result of years of brainwashing and propagandizing. Regardless of the topic at hand, almost always these days a crisis, the only attempt and understanding such an event is either Left or Right – nothing else matters. And so it goes.

In a Town Hall Magazine article, about how the author believes the “Liberal Narrative” is now dead because he says so, the author also refers to himself and all others who think the way he does as “normal.” I’m not sure that would be a correct use of the word. Although I understand what he is trying to say, there is very little “normal” left anywhere in the world – so much so few have knowledge of what the words or liberal, conservative and progressive mean or the history behind them. I’ll spare you the history lesson but encourage you to try on your own. The short of it is the use of such labels are egregiously misappropriated.

Normal to the author is the belief you are a conservative. Normal to the liberal is their own truth, etc.

It is said that conservatism promotes “traditional social institutions in the context of culture and civilization.” Conservatism once emphasized self-reliance and individualism. That aspect of conservatism vanished quite some time ago and only exists as watered down ideology due to our mind manipulated love of government.

With this embedded into our society, one must consider the ignorance of that author when he writes: “When you own a weapon and can defend yourself and your rights, you are a citizen. When you do not, you are a subject.” If you are a citizen, and promote it as something a conservative would strive to become, then what becomes of the “self-reliance and individualism?” Many years ago in Vattel’s Law of Nations, in which many democratically based governments’ constitutions are built upon, it is clearly spelled out that when anyone chooses to become a member of a neighborhood, a town, a county, a state, or nation, they are giving away a portion of their “self-reliance and individualism.” In fact, you become a citizen and by definition you are a subject. The only differences are the degree to which you have offered up your servitude.

When you own a weapon and can defend yourself and your rights, YOU ARE A MAN! Being a citizen means you recognize that your government has granted you that right. Being a man means you understand that you have the right to defend yourself, even from the throes of corrupt governments. It is a struggle to have it both ways, i.e. self-reliance and individualism and dependence on government.

Liberalism, on the other hand, appears to be in even bigger trouble…that is as it pertains to hanging on to any kind of liberal belief. In the true sense of the word and the works and words of men like John Locke, thought by many to be the father of liberalism, I am more liberal than conservative. But that’s not what exists today. Far from it.

Liberalism, by definition, is “founded on the ideas of liberty and equality.” If we are to assume that this ideological philosophy of liberalism is to be shared and experienced by all, then why do today’s liberals want so much to remove liberty and equality from anyone who doesn’t blindly follow them?

Conservatives wander from the their own belief system, once minding their own business, letting others alone while enjoying their own individualism. Conservatives of today are as bent on stopping the liberties of liberals and progressives as liberals and progressives are in stopping the conservatives. What a mess!

It should become clear that all of these political ideologies are skewed and have reached a point where they are shortly running out of space to coexist. I believe this is all by design, but I recognize that nearly all readers will refuse to accept that premise. I cannot force feed you. It is worth gaining a better understanding, but……

The relentless and ignorant debates about guns, gun violence, gun rights, gun control, because of senseless emotions, works wonderfully as a tool to draw attention from what the debate and the staged events are all about.

If you have yet to even question anything beyond a Left vs. Right, childish yelling and banging head session, it would be impossible for you to learn anything.

 

Share

Not Interested Means Preferring The Bliss of Ignorance

There is a rest of every story going on around us all.. Weather it is the Wolf – anti hunting movement.. The political charade most are caught up in.. The lies public welfare teachers and those public welfare free indoctrination institutions put forth as a good “education”. Not interested also means afraid to raise your voice for honesty and truth and compassion against injustice and lying and greed. This has been and is my watch and that is the deepest thing I can say is why I have fought so hard. They have stolen our minds far to easily and I could not and cannot standby and do nothing. I will not leave the earth with my death without having done everything I can do on my watch to cause one more man or woman to show an interest in taking back their own mind from these liars exploiting us and this earths resources for their own gain.. For their own selfish interests that has nothing to do with any other peoples future generations except their own.. All other bloodlines to those who have done this to us according to their words terms and beliefs are a plague upon this earth.. If you believe in anything coming out of their think tanks they have you right where they want you.. Dumb unto death..

 

Share

Government 101

DO YOU REALLY WANT OTHER PEOPLE WHO ARE MIND CONTROLLED IDIOTS DECIDING WHATS BEST FOR YOU OR YOUR IMMEDIATE ENVIRONMENT?

Share

Quote Of The Day

KNOW THAT MOST MEN, INCLUDING THOSE AT EASE WITH PROBLEMS OF THE GREATEST COMPLEXITY, CAN SELDOM ACCEPT EVEN THE SIMPLEST AND MOST OBVIOUS TRUTH IF IT WOULD OBLIGE THEM TO ADMIT THE FALSITY OF CONCLUSIONS WHICH THEY HAVE DELIGHTED IN EXPLAINING TO COLLEAGUES, PROUDLY TAUGHT TO OTHERS, AND WHICH THEY HAVE WOVEN, THREAD BY THREAD, INTO THE FABRIC OF THEIR LIVES— Leo Tolstoy

This be the ‘New World’ of the Homo Vishnu Ignoramus –
Adulterated Humanoid sheep who bear no witness even to their own origins living in their perverted programmed delusions of myths fairy tales and backwards words and terms…

KNOW THAT MOST MEN DO NOT EVEN KNOW THAT THEY ARE MEN…

Share

Trump Asked to Rescind Monument Designations Harmful to Economy, Private Property

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Letter from Free-Market Coalition Urges Comprehensive Overhaul of Antiquities Act

“Dramatic Break” Sought to Combat “Abuses That Have Plagued the Program for Decades”


Washington, DC 
– 
Over three dozen free-market organizations, trade associations, businesses, former federal officials and current lawmakers have signed a letter to President Donald Trump from the National Center for Public Policy Research seeking comprehensive reform of the Antiquities Act and a rollback of national monument designations that threaten economic development and private property rights.  The letter asks the Trump Administration to “deal more forcibly with the abuses that have plagued the program for decades” and “restor[e] integrity and transparency to a process that for too long has been lacking in both.”

“In keeping with President Trump’s campaign pledge to undo the harm massive national monument designations have inflicted on rural areas in the West and Maine, as well as fishing communities along the Northeast coast, the White House needs to take bold action,” said National Center Senior Fellow Bonner Cohen, Ph.D.   “Just trimming around the edges, as Secretary Zinke has proposed, won’t do.”

Responding to an executive order issued by President Trump in April, Interior Secretary Ryan Zinke sent a draft review of national monument designations to the White House in late August.  While the draft report allegedly seeks to curtail the overreach of the Antiquities Act in designating monuments, and suggests scaling back some recent designations, it apparently does not advocate for completely rescinding any monument designations.

The 37 signatories of the National Center’s letter include leaders of prominent free-market environmental groups such as the Competitive Enterprise Institute, Mountain States Legal Foundation and Citizens for a Constructive Tomorrow.  It is signed by former Interior Department officials: G. Ray Arnett, assistant secretary of fish and wildlife and parks during the Reagan Administration, and George Rasley, the former assistant director of the National Park Service during the presidency of George H.W. Bush.  Current Idaho State Representative Judy Boyle and former California State Senate Minority Leader Dennis Hollingsworth have signed the letter, as well as trade associations and businesses representing agriculture, logging and other interests.

The letter points out that many national monument designations are unconstitutional.  Even though wilderness areas require congressional authorization, the letter notes that “[m]any of today’s national monuments are de facto wilderness areas where strict land- or sea-use restrictions are in place.”  The letter adds: “In what is a complete distortion of the Antiquities Act’s original intent, monument designations – whether on land or at sea – frequently involve thousands of square miles that are permanently off-limits to almost all economic activity.”

To remedy the problem, the National Center’s letter advises: “With this history of abuse in mind, we strongly urge the Trump Administration to make a dramatic break with the past and begin to undo the injustices perpetrated in the name of designating national monuments… Federal law has also been circumvented by the executive branch in designating national monuments.  It is time for this unconstitutional practice to end.”

In particular, the letter recommends fully rescinding the national monument designations for the Grand Staircase-Escalante and Bears Ears National Monuments in Utah, the Katahdin Woods and Water National Monument in Maine and the Northeast Canyons and Seamounts Marine National Monument off the coast of New England. [emboldening added]

“President Trump directed Secretary Zinke to review the antiquated Antiquities Act because he recognizes it is terribly flawed.  Radical pressure groups have worked with their allies in government to use it to prevent the American people from accessing natural resources found on already well-protected public lands owned, managed and regulated by the federal government,” said National Center Senior Fellow R.J. Smith.   “The Antiquities Act is used to lock up clean coal deposits, shut down well-regulated fisheries, prevent ranchers from grazing their cattle, close access and recreation opportunities and even take private property.  Our coalition asks the Trump Administration to recognize and end these inherent problems by rescinding unnecessary and harmful designations while returning to environmental policy that embraces multiple-use goals.” 

Legislation to overhaul the Antiquities Act was passed out of the National Resources Committee of the U.S. House of Representatives last week.  This bill would allow a president to reduce the size of existing national monuments while placing more restrictions on the ability to create new ones. 

Share

Presidential Executive Order Promoting Healthcare Choice and Competition Across the United States

PROMOTING HEALTHCARE CHOICE AND

COMPETITION ACROSS THE UNITED STATES

By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, it is hereby ordered as follows:

Section 1. Policy. (a) It shall be the policy of the executive branch, to the extent consistent with law, to facilitate the purchase of insurance across State lines and the development and operation of a healthcare system that provides high-quality care at affordable prices for the American people. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), however, has severely limited the choice of healthcare options available to many Americans and has produced large premium increases in many State individual markets for health insurance. The average exchange premium in the 39 States that are using www.healthcare.gov in 2017 is more than double the average overall individual market premium recorded in 2013. The PPACA has also largely failed to provide meaningful choice or competition between insurers, resulting in one-third of America’s counties having only one insurer offering coverage on their applicable government-run exchange in 2017.

(b) Among the myriad areas where current regulations limit choice and competition, my Administration will prioritize three areas for improvement in the near term: association health plans (AHPs), short-term, limited-duration insurance (STLDI), and health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs).

(i) Large employers often are able to obtain better terms on health insurance for their employees than small employers because of their larger pools of insurable individuals across which they can spread risk and administrative costs. Expanding access to AHPs can help small businesses overcome this competitive disadvantage by allowing them to group together to self-insure or purchase large group health insurance. Expanding access to AHPs will also allow more small businesses to avoid many of the PPACA’s costly requirements. Expanding access to AHPs would provide more affordable health insurance options to many Americans, including hourly wage earners, farmers, and the employees of small businesses and entrepreneurs that fuel economic growth.

(ii) STLDI is exempt from the onerous and expensive insurance mandates and regulations included in title I of the PPACA. This can make it an appealing and affordable alternative to government-run exchanges for many people without coverage available to them through their workplaces. The previous administration took steps to restrict access to this market by reducing the allowable coverage period from less than 12 months to less than 3 months and by preventing any extensions selected by the policyholder beyond 3 months of total coverage.

(iii) HRAs are tax-advantaged, account-based arrangements that employers can establish for employees to give employees more flexibility and choices regarding their healthcare. Expanding the flexibility and use of HRAs would provide many Americans, including employees who work at small businesses, with more options for financing their healthcare.

(c) My Administration will also continue to focus on promoting competition in healthcare markets and limiting excessive consolidation throughout the healthcare system. To the extent consistent with law, government rules and guidelines affecting the United States healthcare system should:

(i) expand the availability of and access to alternatives to expensive, mandate-laden PPACA insurance, including AHPs, STLDI, and HRAs;

(ii) re-inject competition into healthcare markets by lowering barriers to entry, limiting excessive consolidation, and preventing abuses of market power; and

(iii) improve access to and the quality of information that Americans need to make informed healthcare decisions, including data about healthcare prices and outcomes, while minimizing reporting burdens on affected plans, providers, or payers.

Sec. 2. Expanded Access to Association Health Plans. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretary of Labor shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, consistent with law, to expand access to health coverage by allowing more employers to form AHPs. To the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, the Secretary should consider expanding the conditions that satisfy the commonality?of-interest requirements under current Department of Labor advisory opinions interpreting the definition of an “employer” under section 3(5) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Secretary of Labor should also consider ways to promote AHP formation on the basis of common geography or industry.

Sec. 3. Expanded Availability of Short-Term, Limited?Duration Insurance. Within 60 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, consistent with law, to expand the availability of STLDI. To the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, the Secretaries should consider allowing such insurance to cover longer periods and be renewed by the consumer.

Sec. 4. Expanded Availability and Permitted Use of Health Reimbursement Arrangements. Within 120 days of the date of this order, the Secretaries of the Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services shall consider proposing regulations or revising guidance, to the extent permitted by law and supported by sound policy, to increase the usability of HRAs, to expand employers’ ability to offer HRAs to their employees, and to allow HRAs to be used in conjunction with nongroup coverage.

Sec. 5. Public Comment. The Secretaries shall consider and evaluate public comments on any regulations proposed under sections 2 through 4 of this order.

Sec. 6. Reports. Within 180 days of the date of this order, and every 2 years thereafter, the Secretary of Health and Human Services, in consultation with the Secretaries of the Treasury and Labor and the Federal Trade Commission, shall provide a report to the President that:

(a) details the extent to which existing State and Federal laws, regulations, guidance, requirements, and policies fail to conform to the policies set forth in section 1 of this order; and

(b) identifies actions that States or the Federal Government could take in furtherance of the policies set forth in section 1 of this order.

Sec. 7. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:

(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department or agency, or the head thereof; or

(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.

(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.

(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.

DONALD J. TRUMP

THE WHITE HOUSE,

October 12, 2017.

Share

“An Unreal Existence”? and One That Was Planned?

Richard Fernandez tells us – and I suppose there are more that can’t see this than can – that we are living in an “information epidemic.” This epidemic he describes as a world of instant information made up of lies and obviously lacking in truth. The author makes this statement: “What seems to have changed is our mental furniture though we don’t quite understand how it happened.”

For most, it is not a matter of “don’t quite understand.” It’s really a matter of being clueless and that is why it works so well. I say works so well because, while most think our existence is happenstance, I have come to understand that it is a well planned out event that is working tremendously well and operating at breakneck speed. Everyone is caught up in it and it holds danger.

In the article linked to, the author gives readers a list of how he has chosen to describe the state of our existence.

“Technological warfare only seems to increase entropy rather than reduce it.”

“…  Brexit, Trump, Catalonia and the North Korean nuclear breakout far from being exceptions to the rule are harbingers of things to come.”

“Globalization has allowed drastic mutations that biologist Ernst Mayr notes often originates “in a relatively small and isolated population” to propagate very rapidly into a new normal.”

From the New York Times: “We’re in a disruptive period, and when we get through it, the progressive infrastructure landscape may look different.”

“Currently we are obsessed with 71 genders but a nuclear or biological disaster can flip decades of political correctness and deference to technology into their opposite.”

“Many are at a loss to explain entropy and anomie on a scale never seen before.”

“Today we have live in an environment where whole populations are immersed in an ocean of deliberate lies.”

“Instead of increasing privacy so data miners cannot engage in the targeted lying which makes “fake news” so effective we decrease it the better to help the manipulators.”

So, this, according to Fernandez, is our “Unreal Existence.” It is “unreal” when, not only do we not have a clue as to what has happened to us and why, we don’t even have the slightest suspicion.

We often consider ourselves as part of the “intelligentsia” when we whip out the quote that when we fail to learn history, we repeat it and yet our ignorance is revealed because we really know nothing about actual quotes, the context of them or the actual words spoken. I don’t want to get off the subject but needed to point this out because it is part of our failure to have learned anything that would have protected us from the planned assault on our existence.

Along with this fake intelligence, we have failed to understand that the “history” we are told we have failed to learn, and thus driven to a somewhat watered down version of the movie, Groundhog Day, is nothing more than the “ocean of deliberate lies,” Fernandez tells us we are immersed in. How then can we be expected to have or get a clue?

The brilliant, and evil, minds discovered a long time ago the power in mind control and manipulation. (Try reading this for a glimpse into how it all began.) I believe I was completely correct recently when I told someone that the cellphone was a purpose-built instrument for one purpose and one purpose only – the complete destruction of the mind of those who easily have become addicted to it. Don’t kid yourself. The majority of the Western Civilization is completely addicted and controlled by their cellphones. Once the addiction was complete, the rest has been very simple, as an open, clear, honest and concise mind can see.

All of the things I’ve highlighted above are accurate, if not complete, descriptions of our societal existence. It is unreal for most but shouldn’t be. And, is it too late?

Probably.

A simple, and I mean simple, look into this new “ocean of deliberate lies,” and we can see that this was accurately predicted in 1970. Zbigniew Brzezinski “predicted” in his 1970 book, “Between Two Ages: America’s Role In the Technetronic Era.” I put predicted in quotes because one might have the need to ask how he could predict such an event. It is easy to predict when you are part of the powerful, global, “Ruling Establishment” who have come up with the technological instruments, social media, music, movies, books, news, education, religion, etc. that are systematically destroying us. We can’t see it because we are deeply a part of it.

A deeper, forensic examination into the movements and planning of these events, which most don’t understand and others can only describe, shows us actual truth. This requires effort and a willingness to accept the idea that maybe you have been led astray. These two qualities have also been deliberately bred out of our existence – that “Unreal Existence.”

I cannot help you. You can only help yourself and for many, it is too late.

We are mired in an “ocean of deliberate lies.” Those who “study to show thyself approved unto God” know who the author of lies and confusion is. That author is also the head of the “Powers and Principalities,” referred to in this article as the Global Ruling Establishment. And, is head of the Global Power Structure.

Those of us old enough to have a past that can show us things have changed, can be assured it will never return to anything that resembled our past. That is gone forever. I only wish I could help readers to understand that this “information epidemic” and “ocean of deliberate lies,” is a deliberate creation of man designed for our destruction.

If only you could get to that reality…..

 

Share

So Something Happened In Vegas

Real or fake in Vegas the same old anti gun BS comes up… So apparently from reading around the internet various leftist enlightened gurus are singing the same old more gun control song.. Ok, so the left want Donald Trump’s Administration to disarm us apparently..

People who dislike Donald Trump and who, rightfully so, call out the problem of police brutality in America, want to give all the guns in the country to Donald Trump and the police. So the leftists are ok with Donald Trump and that administration disarming the 99% of the gun owning collective that did not go insane and shoot up a concert’s attendees?

Are you leftist boys and girls certain you want to be disarmed with a Donald Trump Administration running the show?

Or just the AR-15s AR-10s which are not full auto weapons and the 50 BMG toys? And that little bump stock.. Meanwhile the Donald’s government has M-16s, MP-5s M-60s, General Electric Mini Guns, full auto 50 BMGs, Apache Helicopters and various tanks at their disposal..And that’s just the short list..

And you’re going to feel safer from those convenient mentally ill lone nut cases that pop up at politically convenient times..

Really?

Somebody please place an order for more leftist diapers… they’ve shit themselves again…

Share

Politicians Hard at Work?

I went to the fair the other day and saw members of the Trump administration busy getting the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service a new director.

Share