July 25, 2017

Wolf Programme Had Support From The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit

Or Obviously The Wolf Programme Had Permission From The President Himself Of The Clinton Administration And Bruce Babbit..

Who has political authority to bypass congress on domestic issues? The issue I’m thinking about would be the wolf reintroduction program using 45-60 million of funds the federal employees and the agency USFWS apparently used to get the reintro done.. So it’s simple, they had the go ahead from a powerful member of the Clinton Administration, probably William J. Clinton himself..

Maybe under some war powers provision.. Some technicality that has been overlooked. There’s probably a signed approval someplace.. The trick is finding it. There might also be some International Treaty implications as well.. The introduction would be under the implementation of The United Nations Environmental Policies Global Biodiversity Assessment being implemented, yet guess what congress never approved that idea either.. Nor has the congress approved the Agenda 21 Programme of Action either but it is being implemented..

The wolf program is part of that environmental philosophy all of these nations agreed to at the U.N.. When they agreed to go along with the United Nations Environmental Policies.. Congress isn’t investigating this because they don’t want to, and because they don’t have the political authority to go get whoever did approve it..Because it is isn’t illegal.. These powerful people don’t owe the subjects any explanations.. And knowing how these governmental pecking order business deals go down there is a paper trail permitting this wolf programme to proceed. So keep squeaking about alleged unconstitutional actions, which are highly unlikely or get off your not interested in real researching asses and find the correct paper trail.. I bet you a president signed it..

“the process to restore wolves to Yellowstone went surprisingly smoothly. Early U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service work, combined with the vision of National Park Service (NPS) Director William Penn Mott, the quiet leadership of Yellowstone Superintendent Robert Barbee, the detailed planning of the Recovery Team, support from the Clinton administration and Secretary of the Interior Bruce Babbitt, and final implementation by Edward Bangs and Steven Fritts of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, with big assists from Yellowstone planners John Varley and Wayne Brewster, were the reasons for the success. Michael Finley was park superintendent when reintroduction occurred. Public support was significant, truly a ground swell of grassroots efforts from a variety of sources (The Wolf Fund and Defenders of Wildlife both at the forefront, plus many others). It is hard to imagine how such a controversial program achieved the success it did. Behind the scenes, there were many others, most notably Norman Bishop, an NPS employee who worked on his own time to educate the public about restoration and why to support it.”
https://www.nps.gov/yell/learn/ys-24-1-wolf-restoration-in-yellowstone-reintroduction-to-recovery.htm

Congress Approved Wolf Reintroduction first in 1973 and second in 1982.. Via the ESA.. So perhaps Nixon is the president that approved it..Also somebody in that power structure had the political authority to authorize the use of the $45-60 million$..  Proof, no investigations no jail time nothing.. Because they made it legal. Lawyers do that, make things legal as they go..

Reintroduction Of The Grey Wolf – The Battle Over The Future Of Endangered Species Policies
http://aglawjournal.wordpress.drake.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/105/2016/09/agVol05No2-Cook.pdf

Code Of Federal Regulations
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2016-title50-vol2/xml/CFR-2016-title50-vol2-sec17-40.xml

Share

The United Nations Is A Privately Owned Corporation

United Nations –

“United Nations
A privately held company in New York, NY. ”

http://www.manta.com/c/mmgxyf3/united-nations

Headquarters of the United Nations
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Headquarters_of_the_United_Nations

A privately owned corporation is rewilding the lands on this landmass.. I bet that is not a good idea..

I bet they intend to make a killing on the deal…

 

Share

The Ghost Of The Deceased Roman Empire Has Arisen

The Papacy is not other than the ghost of the deceased Roman Empire, sitting crowned upon the grave thereof – Thomas Hobbes, English Philosopher 1588 – 1679

CATECHISM OF THE CATHOLIC CHURCH 33
http://www.scborromeo.org/ccc/p1s1c2a1.htm
#57 This state of division into many nations is at once cosmic, social and religious. It is intended to limit the pride of fallen humanity [10] united only in its perverse ambition to forge its own unity as at Babel.[11] But, because of sin, both polytheism and the idolatry of the nation and of its rulers constantly threaten this provisional economy with the perversion of paganism.[12] -33

So orchestrate divisiveness philosophically intellectually and manually? Hahahahahaha!!!

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes/

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/14/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes-part-ii/

OF PRIESTS, MONEY CHANGERS AND SCRIBES – PART III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/18/of-priests-money-changers-and-scribes-part-iii/

~

THE RULE OF LAW
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/the-rule-of-law/

GIVING THE ZOMBIES HELL AND EUGENICS II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/03/giving-the-zombies-hell-and-eugenics-ii-2/

SOLUTION IS NOT IN THE INTERESTS OF THE ELITE
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/18/solution-is-not-in-the-interests-of-the-elite/

CARTA / CHARTER – CREATING CHAOS TO BRING WORLD WIDE ORDER
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/08/26/carta-charter-creating-chaos-to-bring-world-wide-order/

~

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/10/21/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-i/

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/10/24/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-ii/

ALL OF YOU ARE THE ENEMY – EBOLA III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/11/16/all-of-you-are-the-enemy-ebola-iii/

~

EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT I
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/14/eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog-act-i/

EYE OF NEWT, AND TOE OF FROG – ACT II
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/25/eye-of-newt-and-toe-of-frog-act-ii/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iii/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT IV
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/03/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iv/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT V
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/19/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-v/

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT VI
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/01/25/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-vi/

Living under the pillows won’t help…

Share

Now Tyranny Via United Nations Environmental Policies

“Governments have universally exercised a despotic control of consumptions, sometimes from humane, but chiefly from fraudulent motives. Laws for limiting the prices of consumable articles, unattended by the desire of transferring property are of the former description; and laws for controlling consumptions, with the covert intention of transferring property, of the latter. But whether the motive by which such laws have been dictated has been good or bad, their effects have been uniformly tyrannical or pernicious. They have even sometimes created the famines they intended to prevent. The whole code of these laws is a commentary upon the policy of subjecting consumptions to the absolute control of governments, however constituted. When these laws designed to provide the multitude with bread, they starve them; when they pretend to supply the multitude with money, they impoverish them.” ~John Taylor: Tyranny Unmasked
Nothing has changed since John Taylor wrote that in his book Tyranny Unmasked.. Below for those who have actually read and comprehend these tome’s by the U.N. it is irrefutably Eugenics Unmasked.. Being implemented.. While most people protesting these policies beat around the proverbial bush..Albeit the authors of this INSANITY below do cleverly bury their intentions deep into these documents couched in international legal terms and double speak.. Depopulation of useless eaters written in fantastically above grade international legal script.. They’re serious. You’d better be too.. Because it is YOUR bloodline they want to ELIMINATE… Over the usual articles, such as resources, consumables and yes cleverly transferring property into their possession.. It’s the hunger games in real time.. The same old story.. They who die with the most resources here wins the game..
Share

Landless Cattle-less And Sheep-less Husbandry Experts Everywhere

“I worry that implementing non-lethal tools only after wolves (or other predators) start killing livestock may be too late–at that point they’ve learned to target livestock. Better to have good husbandry practices in place and prevent depredations to begin with.”—Jeremy Bruskotter – Ohio State University

Buy some land in the NRMs and some cattle and show us that good husbandry “professor” Jeremy… You’re going to fail.. Then what Mr.Professor?

I know I know.. We all need thousand acre barns to herd our cattle and sheep into at night..

So the wolf with more freewill than even a man can roam unmolested by the law of a mans freewill and self determination.. So the urban jungle dwellers can shed no more tears.. Over the precious wolves..

It is amazing watching people with no business experience in a particular business trying to advise the business owners how to make their business better.. For the wolves.. And the best part is these rascals are pseudo wildlife experts too… Albeit no doubt Jeremy “professor” is an efficient page turner..

Just another day on the public lands wolf farm where wildlife and their owners except no responsibilities for the actions of their wild live stock yet they shriek at the private land owners and lawful public lands grazers and shriek about better animal husbandry..

Of course this nonsense is not about saving carnivores it is all about about draconian fascist legal control measures against people who ranch/farm and hunt.. When a society attacks its own food producers that society does not have long to live..

We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show that we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield.? George Orwell

I have not met a single one of you “anti-wolf management advocates” willing to get down to the nitty gritty and speak to empirical data and facts. It is all this subjective theorizing based on cloistered indoctrination. A very peculiar situation when it is the “Pro wolf management advocates” who are being framed here as those who are lazy uneducated and lacking of moral domestic animal husbandry practices because we fail to outwit nocturnal predators that raid us at night and worse we are censored because according to these professors professing idiocy we have empty substance-less positions for our defense against their outright lies and lunacy. It is blatant and prima facea, and would not stand in even high school debate class. That is the reason they hide in echo chambers chanting their fourth grade nonsense..

Their nonsense would fly well in ‘Politics’ though – wouldn’t it? Yep..

Politics or political thought is a fictitious personally held private belief and nothing more..—ThereIsNoDebt

Notes by ThereIsNoDebt

Etymology of Politics
http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=politics
What is BODY POLITIC?
http://thelawdictionary.org/body-politic/
What is BODY CORPORATE?
http://thelawdictionary.org/body-corporate/
~
Definition of Legislature –
“A body of persons having the power to legislate; specifically : an organized body having the authority to make laws for a political unit”
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/legislature

Definition of body politic
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/body+politic
Note.- A body politic is fictitious in character.
It must be remembered that ‘politics’ deals with affairs of the mind. They are ‘personal opinions’ of how people think we should relate to each other and to which people are entitled to contract or agree with if that is open to them to do so, or just simply ignore. And therefore as opinion, politics or political thought is a fictitious personally held private belief and nothing more.

Definition of Political unit
political unit – a unit with political responsibilities
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/political+unit
Note.- Political units are unable to own land, in fact or in reality, due to their fictitious nature. Their ownership of land is a mere fancy that remains unchallenged, no doubt because they have a monopoly on force. Of which land they ‘claim’ to own, can only be that to be found in the physical world where the living do not dwell. That is why the territorial jurisdiction political units (nations, countries, states, etc.) define legally as being where they are to be found, remains in their definition as, territorial waters, sea bed, continental shelf, and only the subsoil making up the subterranean world.

Another day in the fake imaginations of public lands politicized wolf farmers playing their trivial Political Ponerology of thoughtless pursuits.. Professing idiots in every sense of the word..

If you work 48 hours in 24 hours the wolves won’t kill your sheep says little urbanite Bo professor Peep..

Share

Scripted Pro Political Theater Trump vs. Griffin

Share

Super Puppet Putin To The Rescue?

Share

Amazon Grilled About Anti-Trump Immigration Position as Shareholder Meeting Gets Political

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

*Editor’s Note* – For those with understanding, it is easy to see the theater going on here.

Free Enterprise Project Warns Amazon Executives That Overtly Political Stances May Harm Tech Giant’s Reputation with Trump Supporters

Amazon CEO Jeff Bezos, Owner of the Decidedly Anti-Trump Washington Post, Ducks Question with Claim That Company Does Not Take Political Positions

Seattle, WA / Washington, DC – Today’s annual meeting of Amazon.com investors turned political as a representative of the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project  (FEP) questioned CEO Jeff Bezos over the company’s strong opposition to President Trump’s executive orders on immigration and travel.

 “As an investor advocate, our message is quite simple: taking overtly political positions on contentious, evenly-divided issues is a major risk for publicly-traded companies,” said National Center General Counsel and FEP Director Justin Danhof, Esq., who attended today’s meeting in Seattle and personally questioned Bezos.  “Amazon executives made a clear choice to oppose one of President Trump’s top political priorities, and they need to realize such actions are viewed by Trump supporters through a political prism.  If Amazon is considered anti-Trump, it will almost certainly harm the company’s long-term investors.”

At the meeting, Danhof stated:

Amazon publicly opposed President Trump’s first executive order on immigration.  The New York Post reported Amazon took “a victory lap for its role in halting Trump’s travel ban” after that initial order was halted by the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals.  The company also signed a legal brief opposing Trump’s second executive order on immigration and travel.

Amazon risks reputational harm and consumer backlash for this stance.  Polling indicates nearly half of registered voters support Trump’s actions on immigration.  After Starbucks similarly came out against Trump’s proposed travel restrictions, Business Insider reported that “Starbucks’ brand ha[d] taken a beating.”

Danhof continued:

And Trump’s ban is not the first of its kind.  In 2011, after discovering two al-Qaeda members with links to Iraq operating in Kentucky, ABC News reported “the State Department stopped processing Iraq refugees for six months. . . even for many who had heroically helped U.S. forces as interpreters and intelligence assets.”  One Iraqi refugee who aided U.S. troops was assassinated while banned from entry by former President Barack Obama and then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. . . it doesn’t appear Amazon said or did anything regarding the Obama-Clinton travel ban.

These examples raise a few quick questions.  First of all, Mr. Bezos, do you see any potential downside for Amazon related to the company’s opposition to the President, or from the Washington Post‘s anti-Trump bias?  Current and potential Amazon customers undoubtedly include Trump fans.  Are you concerned they may reject Amazon as they see the company opposes a President and policies they support?  And why were you willing to risk Amazon’s reputation by attacking President Trump’s executive order when it seems you lacked the courage to speak out against the Obama-Clinton travel ban?

 Danhof’s full question at today’s Amazon meeting, as prepared for delivery, is available here.

“In response to our question, Bezos essentially claimed Amazon does not take political positions; it instead takes policy positions.  While this may be the company’s aim, it is often a distinction without a difference.  Regardless of Amazon’s intentions, the company is rightfully viewed as taking a political position against President Trump’s immigration reform efforts,” Danhof said.  “If Amazon was truly just taking a principled policy position, it would have also opposed the 2011 Obama-Clinton travel ban we highlighted in the question we presented at the shareholder meeting.  But Bezos ducked that part of the question.  Interestingly, former Obama spokesman Jay Carney – who is now a senior vice president with Amazon – turned around from his front-row seat when I mentioned the Obama-Clinton travel ban.  It clearly got his attention.”

“I get the impression Bezos understands the risk Amazon faces in becoming overtly political,” added Danhof.  “He chose to answer our question diplomatically rather than double-down on any anti-Trump rhetoric.  He may realize that the company’s actions – and his own – have placed Amazon in a liberal-leaning light.  In the long-term, that would be bad for investors.”

This was the second time this year that a National Center representative asked a question of this nature at a company’s shareholder meeting.  Earlier this year, also in Seattle, Danhof questioned outgoing Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz about that company’s opposition to Trump’s travel ban.  Danhof’s confrontation with Schultz garnered significant national media attention, with stories appearing in the Bezos-owned Washington Post, Business Insider, CNN and The Hill among many others.

Launched in 2007, the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project is the nation’s preeminent free-market activist group – focusing on shareholder activism and the confluence of big government and big business.  Since 2014, National Center representatives have participated in nearly 100 shareholder meetings to advance free-market ideals in the areas of health care, energy, taxes, subsidies, regulations, religious freedom, food policies, media bias, gun rights, workers’ rights and many other important public policy issues.  This is the sixteenth shareholder meeting the FEP has attended in 2017.

The National Centers Free Enterprise Project activism has yielded a tremendous return on investment:

  • FEPs highly-publicized questioning of support for the Clinton Foundation by Boeing and General Electric helped trigger an FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundations activities that dominated the 2016 presidential campaign.  
  • FEP inquiries prompted Facebook to address political bias against conservatives in social media.
  •  Company executives acknowledged media bias at ABC News (Disney), the Washington Post and CNN (Time Warner) in response to FEPs challenges, which helped to bring about more objective reporting and more balanced political representation.
  • FEPs Employee Conscience Protection Project strengthened protections for the political beliefs and activities of over five million workers at 13 major U.S. corporations.
 So far in 2017, the FEP has been featured in media outlets including the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Variety, Associated Press, Bloomberg, Breitbart, WorldNetDaily, Drudge Report, Business Insider, CNET, National Public Radio, American Family Radio and SiriusXM. In 2016, the FEP was also featured in the Washington Times, the Fox News Channel’s “Cavuto,” the Financial Times, Crain’s Chicago Business, the Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Times, Fortune, Newsmax, the Daily Caller, Lifezette, the Seattle Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Chicago Tribuneamong many others.  The Free Enterprise Project was also featured in Wall Street Journal writer Kimberley Strassels 2016 book The Intimidation Game: How the Left is Silencing Free Speech (Hachette Book Group).

 

 The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank.  Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations.  It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 60,000 active recent contributors.  Sign up for email updates here.  Follow us on Twitter at @NationalCenter for general announcements.  To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.

Share

U.N.E.P. – Agenda 2100 Smart Cities: Orwell’s Dystopic Nightmare Being Implemented

Ushering In A Totalitarian Police State In Cashless ‘Smart Cities’
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/01/15/ushering-totalitarian-police-state-cashless-smart-cities/

Agenda 21 Smart Cities: Orwell’s Dystopic Nightmare Comes True

Big Brother is Back – ID Cards Were Nothing Compared to This Government’s Snooping Plans
https://johnnyvoid.wordpress.com/2012/03/24/big-brother-is-back-id-cards-were-nothing-compared-to-this-governments-snooping-plans/

The Great Dumbing Down of Humanity and the Depopulation Agenda…

What Can The New Urban Agenda And Sustainable Development Goals Do For Cities?
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/04/16/can-new-urban-agenda-sustainable-development-goals-cities/

India Elected To Run UN Habitat To Promote Sustainable Human Settlements Around Globe
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/05/18/india-elected-run-un-habitat-promote-sustainable-human-settlements-around-globe/

UN Released And Approved New Monitoring Details For New Urban Agenda
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2017/05/17/un-released-and-approved-new-monitoring-details-for-new-urban-agenda/

Bonner Cohen: UN Habitat III Pushes ‘Compact Cities’
https://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/10/18/bonner-cohen-un-habitat-iii-pushes-compact-cities/

Those looking down at their toes because of lack of interest are self defeated via Silent Acquiescence.. It is assumed by their weak and incorrect non word term arguments against this alleged Sustainable Development being implemented against them that they approve of it, or are actually incapable of intellectually resisting it.. The left right paradigm is in fact facilitating it..

Share

Over Focused On Only UNEP Wolf Issues Is A Huge Mistake

This is what you’re leaving your grandchildren because of your lazy lack of interest in the entire aspect of The United Nations Environmental Policies Biodiversity Assessment – Agenda 2030-2050-2100 Depopulation of Direct Drivers {Thats your children and grandchildren} Population Management of people objectives being implemented all around us in every aspect of today’s reality.. Banking, business, agricultural,slow removal of the hunting model, meat intake, goods and services, medical, legal.. All of course connected to a certain document that can do no wrong since Congress Assembled which is the Corporation Board room for the United States Corporation {privately owned business} via their COTUS deciding these changes of depopulation dynamics are Necessary and Proper.. In other words your beloved constitution is a device to subjugate and even eliminate your bloodline.. This effort is so out in the open to ignore it and continue looking down at your toes is simply completely redundant.. Lazy.. What do these monsters have to do to get your attention? Shoot at you?

Article I Section 8 Powers Of Congress
https://pepehateme.wordpress.com/2017/05/09/article-i-section-8-powers-of-congress/

 

From There Is No Debt.. Numerous blogs within a blog..

 

“THIS IS WHERE PEOPLE ARE BEING LED WITH THE USE OF DISTRACTIONS AND DOUBLESPEAK…TACIT AGREEMENT TO THEIR OWN GENOCIDAL DEPOPULATION AND FEUDAL CONCENTRATION CAMP ENSLAVEMENT”—ThereIsNoDebt

THIS IS THE HERE AND NOW…

The Privacyless, Freedomless Smart City of 2030 the Elite Are Engineering

Note –

Concentration camp smart city inmates, feudal serfs, citizen-slaves, subjects etc., all names synonymous with slaves, cannot of course own anything, and their movements will be restricted and limited within certain boundaries. (The Wildlands Project ensures restricted movement by implanting tracking microchips both in vehicles and personal identifying items and finally people, providing for invisible fences, without the necessity of crude barbed wire, that alerts the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s countries authorities to any attempted escape from smart city concentration camp imprisonment).—ThereIsNoDebt

Rosa Koire : Smart Cities are Future Agenda 21 Hi-Tech Monitored Concentration Camps

Reference material:

Scroll down to Appendix title heading –

APPENDIX I – WILDLANDS

Source:

APPENDICES
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/08/06/appendices/

¬

Flashback

AGENDA 21 – 2030 Genocidal Depopulation, Land Eviction, & Concentration Camp Human Settlements Disguised through the ‘WILDLANDS’ PROJECTS –

Uploaded on 2 May 2009
Henry Lamb on Wildlands Project

Reference source:

The Global Agenda presented by Henry Lamb
Henry Lamb: Agenda 21

Henry Lamb on Global Governance and the Future of the United States

 

Share