June 18, 2018

Controlled Opposition World

Share

Yahweh the one and only true Creator is cast as an incompetent idiot without wisdom and is to be replaced by the worship of men of Scientism. This namely is the root source of Atheism…”You Can Be As God..”

Share

Why I Will Never Get Aboard The U.N.E.P. Boxcar

On the United Nations Environmental Policies being implemented internationally and nationally… All of the REWILDING double speak advocated for by environmentalist groupies explained in brief…

Dear Academiac environmentalist predator worshiper scarcity monger guru;

For any opinions taken from whomever they originate with we know that opinion[s] being of course the fictitious imaginings of an original individual or group, whether or not that fiction is shared by others. While that opinion that is the original opining of others not of your mind we realize you must like the opinion which is why you’re spreading it around.. Once a deep forensic analysis has been fully carried out investigating and validating the opinions origins and the character and beliefs of the original thinker{s] of the opinion many of us come to the realization that there is another ulterior motive behind the original thinking because of the use of double speak in terms used.. Thus we are not so willing to jump on board with your incorrect interpretation of the original opinion.. Since doing so is advocating for our own demise. Silent acquiescence gives rise to consent, and in misinterpreting original intent although cleverly worded and termed to cause you this confusion of the mind you suffer from, failing to comprehend the original intent is silence.. Although in your case is acceptance of original intent  because essentially you’re asking to be depopulated.. Even as you are in denial of what that original intent actually is.. Original intent being depopulation of indirect and direct drivers, people, you, me, them, us… Together.. Thus commonsense tells many of us who understand the original intent, is to advocate against your calls for death by those who intend to bring us all death.. As well your opining original thinkers behind their clever thinking have failed to necessitate ‘full-disclosure’ of their depopulating of us all intent.. The reason might be obvious, if you and your brilliant academiac environmentalist pals comprehended that you are on the list of deletion you might not be so willing to go along with the plan…

Thus I have no choice but to oppose those advocating for their own demise….

And as sources of origination for the modern times environmental movement;

Those original opining thinkers are; Our Global Community, The report of the Commission On Global Governance. Earth Summit Agenda 2100 The U.N.s plan of Action from Rio.. Of course the Global Biodiversity {Perversity} Report – United Nations “Environmental” Policies – Depopulation of Direct and Indirect Drivers = people allegedly the cause of the damage to the eco system that the various environmentalist cults rail on and on about… Openly discussed in various think tank and U.N. documents and books and manual releases over the years.. The First Global Revolution – A Report By The Council Of The Club of Rome… Ah again, depopulation is a must…
And of course their “The Limits To Growth” tome… Lets not forget the over population of people mantra pushed by every environmental group out there, their Bible, the Population Bomb…the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves – Now known as REWILDING.. “The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT… World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF) World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves… The 1001: A Nature Trust; The 1001 Club; World Conservation and Wildlife Trust… U.N. World Bank; IMF… Thats those thinker movers.. The crew that captured and released wolves were merely useful tools..
World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)
World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
Founders –
Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller
“The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organization founded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is the world’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

All aboard!!! That train…. Next stop, exiting earth… The U.N.E.P. ticket to ride please….

So, the academiac environmentalist pseudo conservationists riding that train get their own Darwin award…

Congratulations!

Share

Wolf Farming and other Rewilding Madness Implemented In the Lower 48

If a group of wealthy elitist banking cartel “gurus” who are openly members of various eugenicist groups come up with a plan to save the ecological and biodiversity as defined by their bought and tell it this way scientific community about the earth critical thinking individuals might want to go hmmmmm…

A brief deep synopsis of REWILDING being used to push existing infrastructure out of various regions of the NRMs.. Various groups on both sides of the political paradigm are in denial about this. On the implementation side of the issue they struggle to cover this evidence up.. On the other side of this issue they ignore it, aren’t interested in exposing it, and worse don’t examine the origins of this information exposing the thinkers behind implementation through social engineering and action by useful tools both in public office and in the private sector implementing and advocating for this madness..

The Reintroduction of Wolves in the Northern Rockies was merely a small part within a larger method for some in the service of ‘We The People” at the U.N.{See the official U.N. political Charter}, those “movers” for Making Money, REWILDING private lands next to public lands to cause bankruptcies of private land holders, end cattle and sheep farming for the purpose of confiscating via cheap buy outs of lands for the purpose of wilderness expansion, all under the guise of ecological restoration – REWILDING.. The beginning of the downsizing of the economic model to only support depopulation objectives of direct and indirect drivers, people..

Those real movers are; Our Global Community, The report of the Commission On Global Governance. Earth Summit Agenda 2100 The U.N.s plan of Action from Rio.. Of course the Global Biodiversity {Perversity} Report – United Nations “Environmental” Policies – Depopulation of Direct and Indirect Drivers = people allegedly the cause of the damage to the eco system that the various environmentalist cults rail on and on about… Openly discussed in various think tank and U.N. documents and books and manual releases over the years.. The First Global Revolution – A Report By The Council Of The Club of Rome… Ah again, depopulation is a must…

And of course their “The Limits To Growth” tome… Lets not forget the over population of people mantra pushed by every environmental group out there, their Bible, the Population Bomb…the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves – Now known as REWILDING.. “The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT… World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF) World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves… The 1001: A Nature Trust; The 1001 Club; World Conservation and Wildlife Trust… U.N. World Bank; IMF… Thats those movers.. The crew that captured and released wolves were merely useful tools..

World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)
World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)
Founders –
Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller

“The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organization founded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is the world’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

“The group’s mission is “to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.”[7] Currently, much of its work focuses on the conservation of three biomes that contain most of the world’s biodiversity: oceans and coasts, forests, and freshwater ecosystems. Among other issues, it is also concerned with endangered species, pollution and climate change.”

The United Nations “Environmental” Policies pushing the scientism of biological and ecological diversity perversity presumes they have authority over every man woman and child on earth, and as such, seeks to ban all multiple uses of forest products, of course guns, and hunting from being activities of the slaves they want to control, dominate, even go as far as culling them..

Of course lets not forget the Pope’s, Francis Ecclesiastical released concerning this issue a few short years ago.. All connected to climate change altering habitats thus used as justification for large predators eating up resources that are allegedly over eating said habitat..

All the biggest fraud ever perpetrated against mankind.. Sustainable Development is Eugenics..

Anyway, the origination of the concept pushed by these elite thinkers pushing cleverly disguised eugenics they have socially engineered into the mindless followers of various environmental groups is irrefutable..

Share

The Taboo Temporal Authority Over All The Earth/Mankind Man God

Share

It’s The Blue Light Special Effects Way To A Killing

Share

John Fonzi Henry Winkler McCain

Yep.. They’re all that evil… Biometric’s is far superior science than finger prints.. Politics is fake. They’re all sick in their heads..

Share

Psalms 89:34 – Covenant is Contract.

The men who make their own contracts, charters, constitutions, covenants, all outside of Yahweh’s Covenants, Lawfulness and Justness, cannot make this claim Yahweh makes in Psalms.. For thousands of years man has been making his own contracts, and failing miserably.. This is why they are lawless, because contractual agreements outside of the Covenant of the one true law giver are acts of men in lawlessness, using their perversions of language to enslave one another.. As father Yahweh so stated himself.. What does men’s legalese accomplish? It’s simple.. It keeps everyone focused on the perfection of legalism in their false hope and search of peace rather than focusing on the root cause and true intent of those men who wrote and write legalisms..

Share

4 Ways The State Crime Labs Can Screw You

Share

The Lollipop Mythos of Popular US History

No Citizen Can Own Property

ONCE UPON A TIME IN AMERICA
The Lollipop Mythos of Popular US History

Political charters for centuries have been instruments for the creation of corporate countries. Given an understanding of the nature of Chartered, contractual, compacts constitutions, it becomes clear as to why the following can be seen to make sense.. 28 U.S. Code § 3002 – Definitions
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States.
In the phrase given as, ‘of the United States’, what is the United States ?
Answer:
(A) a Federal corporation

In control of all corporations federal or private which have been created using the same corporate model as the Federal Corporation..

It’s all business..

All countries throughout history have been and still are, of necessity, personally owned private corporations created from personally owned ‘copywritten’ private political charters (constitutions), and that the governments and political assemblies, for example, parliaments and congresses, created under the authority of those constitutions, are mere agents to the owners of corporate countries. As an owner to a constitution, you are within your rights to by-pass your representative political governments and your political assemblies.

So obviously the citizenry are not the owners deciding what their private corporation does with it’s vast properties..

Countries are therefore, The Great Trading Corporations of their Owners –
Read under the title heading, §6. The Great Trading Corporations, on page 7 of,
A treatise on the law of private corporations
by Elliott, Charles B. (Charles Burke), 1861-1935; Abbott, Howard S. (Howard Strickland), 1864-1944
Published 1911

“By the law of England, before the Declaration of Independence, the lands of a man dying intestate and without lawful heirs reverted by escheat to the king as the sovereign lord; but the king’s title was not complete without an actual entry upon the land, or judicial proceedings to ascertain the want of heirs and devisees. Attorney General v. Mercer, 8 App. Cas. 767, 772; 2 Bl. Comm. 245. The usual form of proceeding for this purpose was by an inquisition or inquest of office before a jury, which was had upon a commission out of the court of chancery, but was really a proceeding at common law; and, if it resulted in favor of the king, then, by virtue of ancient statutes, any one claiming title in the lands might by leave of that court, file a traverse, in the nature of a plea or defense to the king’s claim, and not in the nature of an original suit. Lord Somers, in The Bankers’ Case, 14 How. State Tr. 1, 83; Ex parte Webster, 6 Ves. 809; Ex parte Gwydir, 4 Madd. 281; In re Parry, L. R. 2 Eq. 95; People v. Cutting, 3 Johns. 1; Briggs v. Light-Boats, 11 Allen, 157, 172. The inquest of office was a proceeding in rem. When there was a proper office found for the king, that was notice to all persons who had claims to come in and assert them, and, until so traversed, it was conclusive in the king’s favor. Bayley, J., in Doe v. Redfern, 12 East, 96, 103; 16 Vin. Abr. 86, pl. 1…..By the constitution of 1836 of the republic of Texas (article 4, 13 ), it was provided that the legislature should, ‘as early as practicable, introduce, by statute, the common law of England, with such modifications as our circumstances, in [161 U.S. 256, 264] their judgment, may require.’ 2 Chart. & Const. 1757. And by the statutes of Texas, from the time of its existence as an independent republic, the common law of England, so far as not inconsistent with the constitution and laws of Texas, has been declared to be, together with such constitution and laws, the rule of decision, and to continue in force until altered or repealed by the legislature. Tex. St. Jan. 20, 1840; Pasch. Dig. (4th Ed.) art 978; Rev. St. 1879, 3128; Courand v. Vollmer, 31 Tex. 397; Barrett v. Kelly, Id. 476.

By the constitution of the state of Texas of 1845, it was provided, in article 4, 10, that the district court should have original jurisdiction ‘of all suits in behalf of the state to recover penalties, forfeitures and escheats’; and in article 13, 4, as follows: ‘All fines, penalties, forfeitures and escheats which have accrued to the republic of Texas under the constitution and laws shall accrue to the state of Texas; and the legislature shall by law provide a method for determining what lands may have been forfeited or escheated.’ 2 Chart. Const. 1773, 1781. ….’The object of such a proceeding is not simply to have a decree declaring the escheat, and vesting the title in the state, but, by and through process to be issued under the judgment, to divest, not only the title of persons entitled to take the property of the deceased as his heirs, if perchance any such there be, but also, by a sale, to divest the title of the state, and to start, and confer upon the purchaser, a new title, deraigned directly from the sovereign of the soil. Rev. St. 1777-1780….” HAMILTON v. BROWN, 161 U.S. 256 (1896)

Enjoy the cases below, it proves no one can own property, without fear of it being seized for any reason either by the U.S.State, one of it’s Estates or the king/queen of England.

“The cases of purchases of land by aliens and corporations, under the statutes of mortmain, are not in point. It is settled, that an alien or a corporation may, by purchase, take land, but cannot hold; and the doctrine is put on the ground, that if one by an executed conveyance, which is his own act, passes land to an alien, or corporation, he shall not have it back; but it shall belong to the sovereign, upon office found. It is otherwise in regard to the act of law. If the heir, of one dying seized of land, be an alien, the law will not cast the descent on him, because he cannot hold beneficially, and the law will not give with one hand and take away with the other, but will cast the descent upon the next relation who is capable of holding. For the same reason, an alien husband does not take as tenant by the curtesy, nor an alien wife take dower….

It is a well-settled rule of law in England, and in this State as well as in most, if not all, of the other States of the Union, that an alien may acquire lands by purchase, and may hold them against all persons except the King, or the State; but upon office found, the King in England, or the State in this country, may seize and have them. Co. Lit. 2; 1 Black. Com. 372. Different reasons have been given for the rule. Mr. Justice BLACKSTONE, on the page above cited, says that “if an alien could acquire a permanent property in lands, he must owe an allegiance, equally permanent with that property, to the King of England, which would probably be inconsistent with that which he owes to his own natural liege-lord; besides, that, thereby, the nation might in time be subject to foreign influence, and feel many other inconveniences. Wherefore, by the civil law, such contracts were also made void; but the prince had no such advantage of forfeiture thereby, as with us in England. Among other reasons which might be given for our constitution, it seems to be intended by way of punishment for the alien’s presumption in attempting to acquire any landed property.” One of the editors in his note (8) on this page remarks that “a political reason may be given for this, stronger than any here adduced. If aliens were admitted to purchase and hold lands in this country, it might at any time be in the power of a foreign State to raise a powerful party amongst us; for power is ever the concomitant of property.” He illustrates his position by referring to the course pursued by the Czarina of Russia to raise up a party and acquire an influence in Poland whereby she was enabled to dismember that devoted and unhappy Kingdom.

In the case of Governeur v. Roberston, 11 Wheat. Rep. 332, Mr. Justice JOHNSTON, in delivering the opinion of the Court, speaks of the rule as having been so long and so firmly established in the common law, that an enquiry into the foundation of it was a mere matter of antiquarian curiosity, and he then seems to approve what he had seen in an elementary writer, as the reason why the sovereign could not seize the lands until an office was found, to wit, “that every person is supposed a natural born subject, that is resident in the Kingdom, and that owes allegiance to the King, till the contrary be found by office.” There can be no doubt, then, of the rule of law, whatever may be the reason for it, that an alien may acquire by purchase, land or any other species of real estate, and may hold it against all persons except the King or State; and may hold even against the sovereign, until he may choose to have an office found, and process thereupon to have it seized into his hands. Among the modes of acquisition in England and in this State, is that by devise, or disposition contained in a man’s last will. Hence, in England, and perhaps in this State, an alien might take real property by devise, which would give him a good title to it, as against all persons but the sovereign….” TRUSTEES, DAVIDSON COLLEGE v. CHAMBERS’ EXECUTORS, 56 N.C. 253 (1857)

“….At common law, corporations generally have the legal capacity to take a title in fee to real property. They were prohibited in England by the statutes of mortmain, but these statutes have never been adopted in this State, so that the common-law right to take an estate in fee, incident to a corporation (at common law), is unlimited, except by its charter and by statute. But the authorities go to the extent that even when the right to acquire real property, is limited by the charter, and the corporation transcends its power in that respect, and for that reason is incompetent to take title to real estate, a conveyance to it is not void, but only the sovereign (here the State) can object. It is valid until assailed in a direct proceeding instituted by the sovereign for that purpose….” Leazern v. Hilegas, 7 Sargt., 313; Gonndie v. Northamton Water Co., 7 Pa. St., 233; National Bank v. Whiting, 103 U.S., 99; Angel & Ames on Corporations, Secs. 152-777; Runyon v. Coster, 14 Pet., 122; The Bank v. Poiteaux, 3 Rand (Va.), 136 Case is also cited in: MALLETT v. SIMPSON, 94 N.C. 37 (1886)and CROSS v. R. R., 172 N.C. 119 (1916).

Gastromancy
Gas`tro`man´cy. n. 1. (Antiq.) A kind of divination, by means of words seemingly uttered from the stomach. gastromancy. 2. divination by the taste of ones burps or the flavor of ones farts. 3. gut feelings.

“Fantasy, abandoned by reason, produces impossible monsters; united with it, she is the mother of the arts and the origin of marvels”~Francisco de Goya

Tenant status via fee simple is not ownership of land it is leasing of the land.. It is also the opposite of true freewill and of freedom…For an experiment stop paying the States property taxes and learn who really owns the private land.. Below is a great depiction of a public lands owner..

The state is a mythical concept, a jejune concept, one that mankind needs to find the maturity to grow out of. The unquestioning acceptance of this myth, one saturated with internal contradictions, is that which defines the statist politically brainwashed left v. right paradigm Zombies….

Cognitive impairment has been and is the whole purpose of the Public Schools Academy Media Government spokesmen Public Relations Regime.

The prevalence of myths is astounding…

Share