April 20, 2018

An Entertaining Break From a Seriously Screwed Up World System


Check Out Those Curves!

There are explanations of experiments you can do yourself folks, just read Zetetic Astronomy by Dr. Samuel Rowbatham. He has about 300 pages worth, done in the 1800s, which means they should be repeatable and easier to do with better equipment now. Prove the curvature to yourself.. Once you try that one you’re going to go hmmmmm…This is easy to figure out. No rocket scientist credentials are required..


666 Reasons To Doubt Helios-Centric “Science”


Where Did The Sky God Go Part Two

When agnostics or atheists are mocking the sky god worshippers I always wonder which sky god do they mean? The Satan-Lucifer worshipers who’s sky god is in the heaven right above our heads, or the sky god worshipers who believe in YHWH who resides above the firmament that the sky gods above our heads cannot enter? I mean, in the agnostic atheists case this is all just a fairy tale, yet shouldn’t accuracy of the details of the fairy tale be held to? Kinda like mocking the J.R.R. Tolkien fairy tales inaccurately.. And if the agnostic atheists are so against those sky gods why do the agnostic atheists follow the Luciferian worshipers scientism dogma, and even advocate for it.. The Luciferian Agenda for a New World Order.. The Luciferian roots of Modern Science.. The insidious origins of modern-day Scientism, the current religion of most scientists today.. True Believers of scientism ignore the historical antecedents of Scientism, echoing back to The Secret Mystery Schools of Kabbalistic, Egyptian Hermeticism, and onwards into the true nature of Freemason and Alchemical Occultists, such as Sir Isaac Newton, and then further into the nefarious Vatican Jesuit Priesthood, whose hidden hand can be linked to the creation of The Illuminati, as well as the current Luciferian New Age Religion via Roman Priest Pierre Teilhard de Chardin Sovereign Jesuit himself, the New Age Humanist priest influential in bringing forth the New Age Religion. The Darwin family promoted it through the Royal Society of London, The “scientific” Lunar Cult, pushing Evolutionism. better known as Scientism to this read searcher .. Finally, the serpentine path leads up into modern Freemasonic Luciferian, NASA and their spinning flying ball earth circling their Sun god ra.. Heck the Vatican recognizes all of this as legitimate.. Oops.. The agnostic atheist dogma might be as flawed as those sky god worshipers dogmas.. Or is one fairy tale as good as another?


“Eastern Wildway” – Environmentalist’s Fantasy, Nightmare For Everyone Else

When you examine the list of environmentalist groups that support the idea of an “Eastern Wildway Network,” it immediately can be seen as nothing more than a totalitarian nightmare or over-regulation, land seizures, and access denials. Along with such a plan would come the complete destruction of the North American Model of Wildlife Management and the promotion of the introduction of large predators being forced into man-settled landscapes.

If you don’t see all this as part of the NEPA plan and Agenda 2100, then you have a lot to learn. It’s time you started before you wake up some day…..dead!

Backers of ‘Eastern Wildway’ Plan to Present Idea in Maine

A Maine environmental group is hosting a presentation about the concept of an “Eastern Wildway” to help wildlife travel across North America.<<<Read More>>>


Followers of Scientism Love Kabbalah And Hate Bible


Making A New Dog? You Can’t Make This Stuff Up

The Urban Dictionary deems the term “Glossification” as: “…when one has applied the appropriate amount of lip gloss to one’s lips to make them look presentable or more attractive.” Some have likened the event to putting lipstick on a pig.

In today’s world of outcome-based theorizing presented as a scientific study, the desire to appear intelligent and thus powerful drives the intellectual rubbish most accept as viable scholarship. This kind of glossification is known as scientism crafted by scientismists. It can be found almost anywhere.

About a year ago a group of scientismists published a supposition, presented as scientific scholarship, about how large predators, particularly the gray wolf, exposed to “anthropogenic food” (man-created food, i.e. livestock, agriculture, pets, garbage, etc.) may cause the evolution of a new species.

Part of the Abstract reads: “We identify five main ways that carnivores might be affected: changes to social structures, behavior and movement patterns, changes in survivorship across wild- to human-dominated environments, evolutionary divergence, and potential speciation.” (emboldening added)

I’m no smarter than most people and so I wanted to make sure I understood what “speciation” meant. According to the dictionary, it means: “the formation of new and distinct species in the course of evolution.”

I suppose if you are a subscriber to the true sense of Darwinian Evolution, this is an acceptable fantasy – that is that because of the existence of man in this world we will force the evolution of species into “new” and “distinct” creatures. Of course, the simpleton’s question might be; if this is a reality, then how many other species have become “new and distinct” since man has walked on earth? (Note: Somewhere in this discussion it is necessary to establish an honest determination of what a species is and other subspecies of said species. Oh, the trouble this has put us into.)

Another question might be why hasn’t man become a “new and distinct” species due to the changes in diet and other influences from our surroundings over the past few millenniums?

Wouldn’t it be reasonable to expect that if a wolf is forced into cohabitation with man that there would be social structure changes? Conditions in which all of us live, including animals, change constantly. We adjust. That’s how we survive. This adaptation results in “behavior and movement patterns, changes in survivorship.”

But then the authors of this piece of intellectual bankruptcy morph these observations into “evolutionary divergence” – that is the “…accumulation of differences between groups which can lead to the formation of new species…”

I suppose that we should expect that all “vegans” will, eventually, morph into a new species of humanoid? What shall we call them?

But let’s forget evolution for a moment and examine the other aspect of this entire illusionary contemplation. All assumptions discussed in this imitation scholarship are based on the fantasy that man should not be present in order that plants and animals will live in “healthy” ecosystems.

In today’s world of scientismic fantasy, most often presented in terms where man doesn’t exist to screw everything up, we hear two basic terms to describe needed efforts to make all things Disneyesque – healthy ecosystems and restoration of ecosystems. This approach epitomizes the definition of subjective – “based on or influenced by personal feelings, tastes, or opinions.”

Who gets to decide what is a healthy ecosystem? Whether you agree or not with what someone defines “healthy ecosystem,” when suppositions are made from the perspective of the absence of man as part of their ecosystem, what difference does any of it make? Who should care? If a tree falls in the forest and nobody is there to hear it does it make a sound? So long as man walks this earth, all hypotheses in this context are meaningless and serve very little purpose. Who pays for this garbage?

Restoration of an ecosystem can only mean the extinction of man.

Most odd in this intellectual guesswork is that the authors appear as all subscribers to Darwin’s Theory of Evolution. Their evolution can only occur when something changes. Things cannot evolve unless there is a reason for them to evolve. Yet, in their haste to craft “healthy” ecosystems or to “restore” their ecosystems to fit their definitions of “healthy” and remain that way, they must be insisting on a non-changing environment. To admit otherwise is to destroy their own interpretation of what makes an ecosystem healthy. Isn’t this nothing but circular thinking?

It is one thing to discuss how it might be best to manage our environment, to find ways that man and large predators can share living and recreational landscapes, it is quite another to attempt to devise “healthy” ecosystems based on preconceived theories absent the presence of man and/or to “restore” ecosystems to what someone’s fantasy might be.

The real nonsense may just be that someone actually believes that a wolf that eats man-caused foods will one day become a new and distinct species of dog. What I can guarantee is that in a desire to make this fantasy come true, so long as we continue to protect and force wolves to live in man-settled landscapes, cross-breeding between wolves and other canines will take place. This act will result in yet one more breed of dog. Scientismists will be eager to jump to the conclusion of a “new” and “distinct” species. It will be what fits their narrative and saves them embarrassment.

When the vegans of this world have evolved into a new species of humanoid, we must ensure that both the new humanoid and the new species of dog can live in the same environments without either one of them being influenced by the other. Of course, this is biologically impossible unless perhaps we can evolve them into inanimate objects.




Behavioural Engineering – Social Engineering – For Belief Engineering

Consider the Literary ‘supremacy’ – Word term linguistics supremacy – The superior I.Q. of white/black/brown/yellow men, under the influence of demonic possession to that of the inferior I.Q of those men of all cultures races and creeds who are not under the influence of demonic possession… In our daily observations of so called base idiocy and misplaced understanding of the real function of the idea of Intelligence Quotients defined by those under such influences..{I’m willing to bet 98% of folks wandering around out yonder in their meat life rides cannot spot the possessed ones even when they are standing in the open shouting at them..}

If that is the case everything around us all, historical, scientific, philosophical, would be highly suspect.. Especially considering their possession of ancient documents hidden away in their secret vaults we have no access to.. So they can rewrite history, go back and replicate false narratives by creating and using false ancient documents.. Or art.. Or archeological discovery.. Or deep sea discovery..All sudden fascinating and amazing discoveries..

These scoundrels can make up anything and make it appear real.. They’re practitioners of believability.. “Oh mortal man what can you not be made to believe”… Better understand the anatomy of controlled opposition.. Controlled research arena opposition.. They would leave no loose ends.. Consider the etymology of the words believe and knowledge.. Then again, Oh mortal man what can you not be made to want to believe… Like one thousands cuts with the knife.. Like one thousand or one hundred thousand false narratives.. How does one overcome that? They own it all. Even weaponized truth and tell.. They will release truth and study that result..

What if an unseen entity had thousands of years to practice screwing with mortal mans five senses… Can you imagine what that scoundrel could do? Can you? Instead of a comedy of errors I’d call it their comedy of terrors.. I’m saying the enemy of man and Earth has the capability to create any document of literature or art or anything they want tomorrow and they can easily convince the world it is as old as they say it is.. And they’ve been doing that for a very long time now.. Intelligencia Distractions.. Homeland Defense Mechanism.. Claiming they own this earth and defending it from another that claims he created it.. A grand theft in action.. Grand theft Opera.. What a grand gift this is to be born in it..

Truth Fears No Investigation – People that block and censure to shape and control their narrative fear something…


Cointellpro is the very anatomy of controlled opposition-Essential Intelligence Operations of set up opposition or infiltrate opposition…
COINTELPRO (a portmanteau derived from COunter INTELligence PROgram) was a series of covert, and at times illegal, projects conducted by the United States Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) aimed at surveilling, infiltrating, discrediting and disrupting domestic political organizations.

DEFINITION: A controlled opposition is a protest movement that is actually being led by government agents. Nearly all governments in history have employed this technique to trick and subdue their adversaries.

Are we all under surveillance…

Who owns every corporation on this earth? Why that’s easy, the greatest intelligencia agency in world history..

How to turn everything into a weapon…

Everything is a distraction…



Psychasec Company Is Creating HUMANOID/CLONE Organic SLEEVES For Humans To LIVE IN



Most Published SCIENCE Research Findings Are False

Do enjoy the read;

“Why Most Published Research Findings Are False John P. A. Ioannidis Abstract Summary There is increasing concern that most current published research findings are false. The probability that a research claim is true may depend on study power and bias, the number of other studies on the same question, and, importantly, the ratio of true to no relationships among the relationships probed in each scientific field. In this framework, a research finding is less likely to be true when the studies conducted in a field are smaller; when effect sizes are smaller; when there is a greater number and lesser preselection of tested relationships; where there is greater flexibility in designs, definitions, outcomes, and analytical modes; when there is greater financial and other interest and prejudice; and when more teams are involved in a scientific field in chase of statistical significance. Simulations show that for most study designs and settings, it is more likely for a research claim to be false than true. Moreover, for many current scientific fields, claimed research findings may often be simply accurate measures of the prevailing bias. In this essay, I discuss the implications of these problems for the conduct and interpretation of research. Published research findings are sometimes refuted by subsequent evidence, with ensuing confusion and disappointment. Refutation and controversy is seen across the range of research designs, from clinical trials and traditional epidemiological studies to the most modern molecular research. There is increasing concern that in modern research, false findings may be the majority or even the vast majority of published research claims. However, this should not be surprising. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false. Here I will examine the key factors that influence this problem and some corollaries thereof. Go to: Modeling the Framework for False Positive Findings Several methodologists have pointed out that the high rate of nonreplication (lack of confirmation) of research discoveries is a consequence of the convenient, yet ill-founded strategy of claiming conclusive research findings solely on the basis of a single study assessed by formal statistical significance, typically for a p-value less than 0.05. Research is not most appropriately represented and summarized by p-values, but, unfortunately, there is a widespread notion that medical research articles should be interpreted based only on p-values. Research findings are defined here as any relationship reaching formal statistical significance, e.g., effective interventions, informative predictors, risk factors, or associations. *Negative* research is also very useful. *Negative* is actually a misnomer, and the misinterpretation is widespread. However, here we will target relationships that investigators claim exist, rather than null findings. It can be proven that most claimed research findings are false.”
Also see:

Scientists do lie a lot…

When Politics and Money come through the door the TRUTH goes out the window..