December 12, 2018

Very “Intelligent” Wolves…When It’s Convenient

Recently I received what appears to be some kind of newsletter and I’m not exactly sure where the newsletter came from – Perhaps the Wisconsin Wildlife Federation?

Regardless, in that newsletter was written the following: “Dr. Dan Stahler, Yellowstone’s Wolf Program Biologist, gave an interesting talk on the origins of black wolves. There is strong evidence of dog gene introgression into wolves in the last 7,000 years on this continent, causing the black pigmentation. There is evidence that black wolves pick grey wolves for mates and this provides other genetic benefits…”

So what is it going to be? This scientism nonsense is getting way out of hand. Jim Beers described this action of Voodoo Science and Romance Biology as “Pagan.” In the sense that this form of paganism is attributed to the practice of Scientism (i.e. making it up to fit a convoluted theory) then certainly paganistic it is.

The environmentalist pagans tell the world of the benefits of wolves on the landscape, that these diseased, killing machines are intelligent enough to kill only the lame, diseased, or unwanted (by man’s assessment) of their chosen prey species. How brilliant these animals must be.

But when science suggests from boots on the ground evidence that wolves are intelligent enough to recognize a pregnant elk (a succulent fetus is preferred dining for wolves), environmentalists scoff at any such nonsense that wolves are capable of doing that.

And now we have someone who is saying that there is “evidence” that black wolves (by definition a mongrel, hybridized mutt) deliberately select grey wolves to breed with. Seriously? The way the newsletter is worded it makes it sound as though the wolves are intelligently and deliberately making this selection in order to provide genetic diversity. Let’s be serious shall we?

Maybe black wolves have some sort of fetish for things grey…or not. Either way, and whether or not you want to believe whatever it is you are programmed to believe, there is no agreement on the amount of intelligence a wolf has. Mostly because perverted individuals try to project their human emotions onto the animals they are in love with.

Comparatively, wolves are a smart animal. Somehow us delusional and insane humans want them to be as smart as whatever fits our political or perverted agendas.

But in all seriousness, I have little doubt that a black wolf picks a grey wolf for a mate because it benefits the species by providing genetic diversity. 

COME ON MAN!

Share

Chernobyl Wolves Might Grow Women-Like Breasts and Large Penises

This kind of reporting should be banned. In an attempt to mislead and embellish nonsensical, scientismic, propaganda, The Sun has published a story about how wolves “infected” with radiation from the radiation “accident” (wink-wink) at Chernobyl, might spread “mutant genes” to wolves in the surrounding regions: “The news has sparked concerns among some in the scientific community that the animals may mate and spread mutant genes to other packs… It now seems that the lack of human interference at the disaster site has allowed the wolves to thrive in the 1,000 sq mile exclusion zone.”

So, get this from these mental midgets. The piece states that: “They [the wolves] began to take over the eerie site in 2016 and the pack’s population is now thought to be seven-times larger than usual.”

The “nuclear accident” occurred in 1986. Thirty years later – let me restate that – thirty years later, when people cleared out and left the entire “exclusion zone” vacant, wolves began to move in. Researchers don’t even know if any of the wolves in question have any radiation poisoning and certainly not any “mutant genes” caused by radiation.

As a matter of fact, one scientist said, “We have no evidence to support that this is happening. No wolves there were glowing – they all have four legs, two eyes and one tail.”

These clowns could have just as easily copied my headline at the top. It would have just as much meaning.

Share

Still Pushing “Climate Change” As Effecting Winter Ticks. Changing Propaganda?

It is incredibly insane listening to and reading the idiots who insist on spreading the lie that Climate Change is the cause for an increased presence of winter ticks which consequently are killing moose by sucking them dry of blood.

For years now, brain-dead scientismists have beat their propaganda drums that due to “lack of cold winters and ample snow” winter ticks are thriving and killing moose. Their premise has been that northern states, like Maine, because of warmer winters was not killing the ticks. Ignorance and the need to promote a false, non-existence of “Climate Change” (in the context that it is being promoted) failed to understand the complete life cycle of the tick and to what severity of cold, snow, and the right conditions needed to actually limit the number of ticks.

But that hasn’t stopped them from their money-making promotions of “Climate Change.”

From news out of Canada, a report falsely claims that global warming is the cause of moose mortality in Maine and other Northeast States as well as Canada. However, this time around, perhaps motivated by the fact that nobody is buying the B.S. that the lack of “normal” cold winters and snow are causing the ticks to thrive (people are looking out their windows and seeing 3-feet of snow and below zero temperatures in mid-November), they’ve decided to change their propaganda (lies) to approach the manipulation from a slightly different use of words (such as changing global warming to climate change): “…that tick is a parasite that’s given more time to find a host. Moose are just exposed to this potential parasite load for a longer period of time.” (emboldening added) There is never any consideration that the simple fact that too many moose perpetuate the growth and distribution of the winter tick.

Because, evidently, the lack of cold and snow (which isn’t happening on a regular basis) isn’t working out to substantiate their false claims of global warming they now are promoting that due to a warming climate ticks have a longer period of time to find a host moose to ride on for the winter and such them clean of blood.

What’s amazing is these clowns spend all of their “research” time (wink-wink) trying to figure out what’s happening to the moose because of the tick (by using someone else’s data) and nobody is interested in studying the actual tick. The only information being used about the tick is nonsense spread from one half-baked scientismist to another and repeated en masse and eagerly by an irresponsible, enabling, and lazy Media.

Evidently the authors of this propaganda piece didn’t bother to ask those in Maine conducting moose studies, or they didn’t want to because it might upset their agendas, otherwise, they would have found that Maine’s biologists are suggesting that the seemingly unprecedented spread of winter ticks is caused simply by the presence of too many moose.

But, there is no money in finding solutions and there is far more money in perpetuating “Climate Change.”

What’s most sad is the fact that truth and reality are being suppressed due to the perpetuation of the false myths about global warming.

Share

Government Climate Report/Lie: A Criminal Event Worthy of Imprisonment

If you want a good laugh, the Government Climate Report (which by the way is NOT a “Government” report as the lying bastards want us to believe) can be found at this link. Note that for the most part, it was the same lying bastards who lied about warming temperatures that created the new lie about “We’re All Gonna Die!”

These phony baboons have an excuse for everything as they blame everything on “Climate Change.” They admit they can’t prove any of this nonsense but that doesn’t stop them. If you choose to believe that man is the cause of some kind of global warming or even climate change, just consider the fact that these buffoons have been caught so many times fudging their own data to make it look like it’s really warming up they have zero credibility everytime they open their mouths.

The report even went so far as to say that if it wasn’t for Global Warming, the earth would actually be cooling because of sun activity – wink, wink. The sun’s activities are keeping the rate of warming in check, according to these con artists.

One of the authors said, “We are seeing the things we said would be happening, happen now in real life.” Children can have vivid imaginations.

However, put a little thought into this statement: “Climate change is transforming where and how we live and presents growing challenges to human health and quality of life, the economy, and the natural systems that support us…

“Annual losses in some economic sectors are projected to reach hundreds of billions of dollars by the end of the century…

“We’re going to continue to see severe weather events get stronger and more intense…”

We know that “Climate Change” as is presented to us by the U.N., U.S., paid scientismists, and our extremely corrupt government, is about as fake as you can get, and yet, with the help of an enabling Media, continued hype of weather events, the same kind of weather events we have had historically for centuries, instills fear in people who are incapable of any kind of rational thought anymore causing them to accept the premise of Climate Change. Thus…We’re All Gonna Die!!!

There is only one way that all these “weather” events can happen as predicted. That’s if you control the technology to make it happen. We know the technology exists to control the weather with chemical spraying and lasers. This same technology can enhance a weather event that could cause weather systems to change the composition and the tracks they might normally follow, making them more severe or tracking them along desired routes in order to cause the most or sought after devastation.

As a means of hiding the Government’s own sinister, evil, demonic actions, what better way to do this than to fabricate Climate Change that is conveniently attributed to everything.

If the technology exists to manipulate the weather to make it severe, does it stand to reason this same technology could be used to make weather events less severe? Instead, the thieves, robbers, and liars in Washington, along with their paid bands of criminal scientismists, suggest the cure is MORE TAXES. And you still want to believe that your government is not the lying, cheating, stealing, corrupt demonic slimeballs they really are.

 

Share

Hide the Decline Has Become Create an Incline

*Note* – A regular reader of this website sent me all the links and information to compile this report. I am thankful for his help. (TKR)

The other day we discovered that “researchers” had published text in the journal Nature stating what they claimed showed that ocean temperatures were warmer than first estimated until a critic and mathematician questioned the margin of error published as part of their findings.

The authors subsequently began to walk back their findings but still claimed that the ocean temperature was still much warmer than original predictions indicated.

To understand this, one has to understand the fraudulent scientism and outcome-based, corrupted “scientific process” these criminal scammers are using. The authors of the fudged article claim: “Much of the data on ocean temperatures currently relies on the Argo array, robotic devices that float at different depths. The program, which started in 2000, has gaps in coverage.

By comparison, Keeling and Laure Resplandy, a researcher at Princeton University’s Environmental Institute who co-authored the report, calculated heat based on the amount of oxygen and carbon dioxide rising off the ocean, filling round glass flasks with air collected at research stations around the globe.”

In case you failed to understand what this is saying, let me see if I can help. No longer are these clowns actually measuring the temperature of the ocean water or the air for that matter. Instead, they are collecting oxygen and carbon dioxide and then calculating what they want the temperature of the water/air to be to fit their fraudulent theory. If you accept this false premise and scientific fraud, it means that you are a promoter and a “True Believer” of the false claim that carbon dioxide causes warming.

Don’t lose your thoughts on this process as I continue.

It also seems that this same kind of deceit and misrepresentation is being used by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Association (NOAA) in publishing claims about warming air temperatures globally.

According to Realclimatescience.com, NOAA collects air temperature data from over 1,200 locations globally. What we are learning is that when it comes time to report data, sometimes more than one half the stations don’t bother. No problem! NOAA simply makes up the data, claiming they “make adjustments” as they receive the data. Problem is they don’t always get any data, and it appears they don’t really care.

An NOAA graph showing actual measured temperatures, versus “adjusted” air temperatures, looks like this:

It is important to recognize that if you were to migrate the two colored lines closer and closer to approaching being on top of each other, we see that the paths of the graphs are identical. In other words, the “adjustments” were crafted to make it appear that from the beginning of the measuring process until the more recent time period, warming is becoming greater. How convenient.

Recall what I wrote earlier about “researchers” no longer actually measuring air temperatures, but instead collecting and measuring oxygen and carbon dioxide? Oddly enough, it just so happens that adjustments that NOAA makes to their temperature data coincide exactly with the amount of carbon dioxide they claim to have collected.

Powerline Blog’s John Hinderaker gives readers a look at how NOAA fudged their data (adjustments) for Auburn, Maine to show one location where such manipulation makes it appear as though in the past 15 years or so, global warming has really accelerated.

In a graph that looks eerily like the one shown above, we can see that the green line is what NOAA says is the average yearly temperature. The black line is “measured” air temperature and the blue line is what the new graph looks like after “adjustments,” i.e. fabricated data. Once again, take notice that if you move the blue line up the chart it almost magically looks just like the black line – only early on in the history of measuring, the blue line indicates it was much colder than the actual measured or yearly average temperatures indicate.

Fraud! It’s a scam! It’s a criminal enterprise when you consider the billions of dollars being earned promoting this nonsense. Why are these people not locked up in jail? Oh, wait. I know. They are all part of the rigged system. It’s for the very same reason that we get drawn into what is presented as crimes by politicians, yet never any prosecutions. RIGGED.

According to this guy, politicians who were very outspoken and supportive of “Climate Change” got voted out of the election process. Nothing is presented to substantiate his claim of such other than names and how they stood on climate changer. Maybe, maybe not.

I do know that this writer is far more optimistic as to why voters voted the way they did. He writes, “There is no evidence humans are on the verge of suffering from catastrophic man-caused climate change. Voters know it, and that’s why they sent a clear message to Democrats and Republicans in the midterms: Stop putting the interests of left-wing environmental radicals before those of working families — and if you do, do so at your own peril.”

I’m simply not convinced that there are that many voters that understand the real, honest-to-goodness scientific process that can produce real honest results. I wish there were.

Perhaps the only hope is that with more and more people presenting more and more evidence of FRAUD that is costing them financially and in the loss of freedom, more people will begin to “get it.”

Yes, Climate Change is a scam. Scientifically, it is impossible to happen unless it is being done deliberately by men, i.e. our own government. The purpose of the promotion of Climate Change in this context is to rob us of more of our money. What happens when the Government and the Global Power mongers have taken all our money?

They will come for us and kill us in so many ways we can’t comprehend.

Share

In Effort to Promote Global Warming, Scientists Screwed Up on Ocean Warming

Researchers with UC San Diego’s Scripps Institution of Oceanography and Princeton University recently walked back scientific findings published last month that showed oceans have been heating up dramatically faster than previously thought as a result of climate change.

“Our error margins are too big now to really weigh in on the precise amount of warming that’s going on in the ocean,” Keeling said. “We really muffed the error margins.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Wildlife 101

By James Beers:

Fantasy disguised as “science” is called “junk” and your report about Yellowstone (Wolves, Cougars Help Restore Landscape) in the 12 November U. S. Watch is “junk”.

Despite the titles of the authors and University status of their employment, elk herds did not “grow in size” due to the “widespread extermination of wolves and cougars”.  They grew in size because the Park Service bureaucracy would not allow hunting of elk (or anything else) in the Park for the greater part of the last century.  Neither hunters nor federal bureaucrats did anything about the elk increase except study and whine about it.

Hunting that would have kept the elk at any desired level while funding conservation programs went unjustified for decades.  In addition to visceral NPS prohibitions, could elk management have been justified to “restore willow plants and other vegetation along the park’s streams” or to change “the herd’s behavior” or to “allow streams to return to a ‘more’ natural state”?  Right!

Hunting or those vaunted “government sharpshooters” using modern wildlife biology could have kept elk at whatever level was desirable.  Such a “level” however, has become a value decision for decades with urban fantasies slowly gaining steam to denigrate human management of wildlife for human welfare in favor of unmanaged ecosystems with dangerous deadly and destructive large predators at large threatening people while killing certain animals like moose, dogs and livestock in unacceptable numbers.

Think of it as replacing truthful data and knowledge with free-roaming, protected predators; a practice condemned in writing first by the Greeks hundreds of years before the time of Christ.

Jim Beers

12 November 2018

Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC.  He also served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in the Aleutian Islands.  He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC.  He testified three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority.  He resides in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.

Share

Too Many Deer? Not Enough Forest? Who Gets to Decide?

I was sent a link to an article about the woes of Wisconsin in places where someone gets to say there are too many deer and that having “too many” deer is not good for the forest and may even promote disease in animals and people. Whose perspective is right? Who gets to decide how it should be?

Perhaps the work written of in this article is all, mostly, or some or not true. Who is to say really. We read it as working class stiffs and either agree with it because it fits into our own narratives conveniently, or dispel it because it doesn’t. So what’s the problem?

If there are too many deer, who gets to make that determination and on what basis do they use to decide? The researcher in focus says that where there are “too many” deer, it’s not good for the forests. Who says?

In reality, one has to wonder how much of any of all this discussion would even be happening if our society hadn’t turned into one of hatred of man and preferred affection of animals? There was a day, really not that long ago, when it was never questioned about why game managers were manipulating herds to the benefit of consumers/hunters. Yes, people needed and wanted deer meat to eat. It was not questioned. It was actually encouraged…if today’s young, progressives can believe that.

Today, it’s a different story. Hatred, greed, anger, radical animal protection has turned the table. When you combine all of this with money available to carry out the scientism of outcome-based studies that will be used to prop up environmentalists’ groups, used to sustain their onslaught of money-making lawsuits, is there anything left that at all resembles true scientific processes?

To somebody, Wisconsin has too many deer. To others, there’s not enough. To somebody, the number of deer that exist are damaging the forest. To others, what exists is normal. But the real question should be looked at from whose perspective these statements are being created? And who gets to decide?

What I see, mixed in with all the greed and corruption, are entities like the forest industry buying whatever “research” they can afford to protect their working forests. This is not unlike hunting organizations wishing to protect the very game they desire to chase which happens to be a very lucrative industry in its own right. Toss in the billions of dollars spent by well-funded environmental groups and it’s a war.

Was it always this way? It seems that before Environmentalism reared its extremely ugly, hate-filled head in the 1970s, the forest industry and the hunting industry go along quite well. This union was also readily accepted by society as part of American Heritage.

As has become the norm, money talks and $#!% walks. Money and greed can get you anything you want because there’s enough greed to go around. Perhaps the researchers are doing their work rooted in their own brainwashed and propagandized perspectives and don’t see the corruption behind it all. We either accept it or reject it and whoever gets the most support in numbers and money, wins.

What a life!

Share

“Oh Give Me a Home, Where the Buffalo Don’t Roam..”

By James Beers:

News Item from:  THE WESTERNER

National Park Service Approves Quarantine And Transfer Of Bison To Tribes  By MELODIE EDWARDS  MAY 25, 2018

Hundreds of bison that leave Yellowstone National Park each year are rounded up and killed to keep them from spreading brucellosis. But tribes have long wanted the disease-free bison to go to reservations.

Now, the National Park Service has signed an environmental assessment that will quarantine animals for six to 12 months before releasing them into tribal care. Public lands are also interested in growing bison herds. 

In the fall of 1957, during hunting season and while I was playing high school football; I came down with a high fever, swollen glands and a spleen the “size of a baseball” according to my doctor.  I spent 5 days in the small-town hospital and a week at home in bed.  I had contracted undulant fever, the human manifestation of brucellosis.

No one could figure out where I got it and there was no County Health Department at the time so the source of the infection went unresolved.

More than 5 decades later while researching diseases, infections and other deadly and dangerous maladies carried and transmitted by wolves, I came across some OLD veterinary science. (Note: NEW vets and their researchers don’t touch anything like this for fear that those soccer moms with money and pets that they “love” like our parents used to love us might think their veterinarian was anti-wolf and probably pro farming, ranching, animal ownership, hunting, etc.)  Brucellosis, I learned is carried by dogs and wolves, coyotes and any other Canid that happens to wander into an infected area.  They can contract it from any infected item eaten, mouthed or sniffed, or from blood contact like rolling in infected material with skin lesions or oral contact with infected material.  Further reading explained that brucellosis can be transmitted by saliva to humans and livestock.

That fall I had a Chesapeake Bay Retriever that was a crackerjack pheasant-finder and duck-retriever.  I had permission over a wide farm area to wander with that dog and my shotgun pretty much at will as time permitted.  The farms were mainly dairy and corn farms with lots of edge and ditches holding everything from mallards to snipe and mink.   I am now convinced that one or more dairy cows had brucellosis in the areas we wandered through and my dog had contracted it (probably in a pasture) and I got it from his saliva.  Canids can be simple carriers showing no outward symptoms.

That dog and I were on the same wavelength and I often showered him with praise when he did what I wanted.  I would often scratch his ears and put my face close to him letting him lick my face.  I also had cuts on my hands from football, cutting wood, etc. that he would lick when he noticed them.  He and I had been hunting mallards and pheasants in the days before I went into the hospital and my mother feared I would die while the diagnosis was uncertain.

There are many other reasons than cattle infections to keep agricultural/farming areas free of animals like buffalo that can contract, carry and transmit brucellosis.

  • Just think about some dark buffalo standing on a gravel road at 10 o’clock some stormy night as you drive home from some business in town with your kids in the back seat asleep.
  • Think about pasture and field fences that are simply stumble points for buffalo.
  • Think about ornery buffalo bulls getting in with cattle.
  • Think about buffalo in plowed ground or corn or wheat or a garden or a green pasture.
  • Think about hunting as I was one fine day behind a dog in an enormous stretch of rolling hills and grass near Malta, Montana for pheasants and sharptails.  There was nary a tree in sight.  What if the dog topped a ridge and startled or otherwise bothered some buffalo out of his or my sight and the buffalo went for the dog?  Where and to who would the dog go?  If you said, “why to you”, Bingo!  So where would I and my 20 gauge with #6’s go??  Quick now buffalo can move pretty fast.

Buffalo were extirpated on the Great Plains and mountain valleys, not by “hunters” nor for “sport”.  Buffalo were extirpated for the common-sense and common-good purpose understood by men without “degrees” but with families and a hope to raise them by raising crops and grazing livestock.  They knew that you could never do those things with free-roaming buffalo in the neighborhood.  DITTO, by the way, for wolves and grizzly bears.

Our native American brethren welcome buffalo on select reservations for many reasons that are best left unmentioned, just they did and do with wolves in cahoots with bureaucrats and radicals.  Even when tribal members shoot and kill a wolf, they are “punished” like Montessori kids whose dog ate their homework, while you and I may go to prison and lose our voting and gun rights plus pay a large fine for even attempting to “take” a wolf.  Like the wolves, buffalo on reservations will certainly wander off the reservation and begin more mayhem than I mentioned here as their numbers increase and their range spreads just like wolves and grizzly bears.

While rural Americans will “howl” about all this like Atlanta under Sherman, the natives will only smile and the urban environmental radicals; animal rights extremists; urban lawyers; state wildlife agencies; and “perfessors” in search of money, graduate students and notoriety will swarm into media reports, demonstrations, classrooms and lawsuits to “save” the buffalo. Media outlets and courts of law will be platforms protesting everything from how “they” (the buffalo) were here first and how any “control” would jeopardize the precious buffalo “family” structure to how buffalo “restore” the prairies (and other) “ecosystems” while being of immense benefit to rural America (all of which is 100% BS) as the accompanying rural evacuation as in The Grapes of Wrath they are perpetrating continues.

I guess you can mark me down as a supporter of a big (8’ x 12’) professional sign I saw next to the entrance of the Catholic Church in Malta, Montana when I went to church there while bird hunting one fine fall Sunday morning a few years ago.  It read:

NO FREE-ROAMING BUFFALO IN MALTA… VOTE NO! 

Consider:

  1. Buffalo are very susceptible to being infected with Brucellosis.
  2. If not contained, buffalo will roam far and wide; and when uncontained they are, by definition, without an owner responsible for their actions or effects.
  3. When free-roaming buffalo encounter Brucellosis, they will contract and spread it.  The likelihood of cattle, canids and certain humans contracting and spreading brucellosis is significant.
  4. Who would check free-roaming buffalo for Brucellosis and how would you know which buffalo is checked as buffalo numbers and range increase?  For how long and under who’s jurisdiction and oversight would free-roaming buffalo be checked? How thoroughly and how often, as in all or annually would free-roaming buffalo be checked? How practical is that? How much would it cost?  Who pays for all this with what funds?   Who has primary jurisdiction over which (federal land/private land/state land/reservation/entire species/etc.) buffalo?
  5. Who is responsible if there is an outbreak of Brucellosis or other damage to the public by these government-introduced (GI) Buffalo?  Is it to be like government-introduced wolves and grizzly bears that kill people or destroy private property with no government responsibility while the blame is placed on human victims for not behaving correctly or for violating some bureaucratic regulation?
  6. Who, with any common sense believes that all this checking will be done for more than a few (at most) years, while Draconian law enforcement will increase and go on for a bureaucrat’s forever as the buffalo increase and spread?

The real point is the urban supporters are not harmed by buffalo or wolves or grizzly bears (or pythons): while the ruralcitizens lack both the political power and financial wherewithal to stop what is being perpetrated upon them by powerful bureaucracies for all manner of foul agendas.

If this were made into a movie it could sensibly be titled, “The Bride of Wolves and Grizzlies”.  The past 40 years of this same scheming by federal and state bureaucrats, Indian Tribes and radical organizations to similarly introduce and protect wolves, grizzly bears and now buffalo as adjuncts to Wilderness; Government Land Purchases, Government-supported Easements of Private Property; Public Land Closures to use and management; and a host of other government moves on behalf of radical groups intending to ultimately depopulate the rural West and the Great Plains.  Like wolves and grizzlies, buffalo will only increase and speed up the dissolution of local communities’ economies and safety to steadily establish unchallenged federal enclaves that destroy communities, rural families and local governments while making state bureaucracies little more than federal offices.

George Orwell, call your office.

Jim Beers

9 November 2018

If you found this worthwhile, please share it with others.  Thanks.

Jim Beers is a retired US Fish & Wildlife Service Wildlife Biologist, Special Agent, Refuge Manager, Wetlands Biologist, and Congressional Fellow. He was stationed in North Dakota, Minnesota, Nebraska, New York City, and Washington DC.  He also served as a US Navy Line Officer in the western Pacific and on Adak, Alaska in the Aleutian Islands.  He has worked for the Utah Fish & Game, Minneapolis Police Department, and as a Security Supervisor in Washington, DC.  He testified three times before Congress; twice regarding the theft by the US Fish & Wildlife Service of $45 to 60 Million from State fish and wildlife funds and once in opposition to expanding Federal Invasive Species authority.  He resides in Eagan, Minnesota with his wife of many decades.

You can receive future articles by sending a request with your e-mail address to:   jimbeers7@comcast.net

If you no longer wish to receive these articles notify:  jimbeers7@comcast.net

Share

Frigid weather and extended snow cover once kept the ticks in check.

BULLPUCKY!!!!!!!!!

As is typical of Environmentalism’s propaganda machine and brainwashing throughout all of Academia, another BS article in the Bangor Daily News, when discussing the problems with winter ticks and moose, states that “Frigid weather and extended snow cover once kept the ticks in check. But with climate change resulting in winters starting later and less snow in some places, winter ticks have more time to find their hosts.”

This is utter nonsense – propaganda fomented by environmentalists to promote their lies about global warming. It’s also ignorance about the winter tick itself. Even existing studies don’t support such nonsense.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!!! GEEZUS MAN!!!

So, is Maine now backing off their claims of earlier in the year when they were leaning toward attributing the large growth and presence of winter ticks to an inflated moose population? Maybe there are more grant monies available to those promoting Climate Change?

This is what Maine’s moose biologist Lee Kantar said about the differences in moose between Northern Maine and those in Western and Southern parts of the state: “I’m trying to strike a balance here between concern for moose in parts of the state and then the idea that in other parts of the state, in northern Maine, the population appears to be quite stable…We’re trying to do our due diligence in understanding the moderating climate, winter ticks and moose densities.”

If they believe in their nonsense about climate change then why can’t they see that attempting to grow moose in Maine to levels that are too high to sustain a healthy population, in time will force moose further south into climates that might attribute to better survival of the winter tick? But then again, weather and climate play such a minor role in the existence and perpetuation of the winter ticks that biologists are wasting their time trying to figure it all out.

It’s all hocus pocus – biology 101. If you want to get rid of the winter ticks and thus the high rates of mortality among moose calves and female moose, reduce the population. The longer wildlife managers remain befuddled by the BS lies of Climate Change, nothing will ever be learned.

God, the insanity!!!

Share