October 21, 2019

The Ruby-Throated-Croople-Poop Duck Stamp

Ah yes. The goal in case you have been hibernating, “to change the way in which we talk about wildlife management.” A new plan – to put non-game birdies on the Federal Duck Stamp. That’s an idea to kill for!

Maybe a picture of the Crunch Bird on the next Duck Stamp will work.

CrunchBird

Don’t know the crunch bird? Here’s a story about the Crunch Bird.

A wife, having had it with her nasty-acting husband, made a trip to the pet store. She told the attendant there that she was looking for a pet for her belligerent husband. Something to keep his mind on something besides being a pain in her backside.

“Oh, I see! I think I have just the creature for him,” stated the pet manager. With that he went and got the Crunch Bird.

“What is that?” asked the frustrated wife.

“Why, that’s a Crunch Bird,” replied the pet man.

“It’s ugly!” she said emphatically.

“Perhaps,” replied the manager. “But, watch what he does.”

With that he says to the bird, “Crunch bird! Mouse!” When suddenly the bird attacked the mouse…crunch, crunch, crunch and the mouse was all gone. Not quite convinced, the manager says, “Crunch Bird! Cat!” And the bird went crunch, crunch, crunch and the cat was all gone.

The wife, with a bit of evil glint in her eyes said, “I’ll take it!”

So, she took the Crunch Bird home. When her husband came home from work, the first thing is spotted was the Crunch Bird. He yells, “What in the hell is that thing?”

The little woman says, “Why dear! I bought that just for you. I thought it was the perfect gift. It’s a Crunch Bird.”

To which he angrily replied, “Crunch bird? My ass!”

According to an article at Field and Stream, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service claims they are trying to find ways to raise more money. They say they need it to keep the migratory bird program going. (ROFLMAOATMFL) I think they need the money to keep up paying for early retirement, pensions and bonuses.

But Don’t go look!

Makes a lot of sense, putting pictures of birds that aren’t game birds on a tax stamp that is needed to kill migratory game birds. Afterwards, we can paste a picture of Ted Nugent on the new promo posters for “Save the Jumping Meadow Mouse!”

HippoMoose

 

Share

Filth and Decadence to Prop Up Wolf Protection

It’s the way of the world. Filthy and perverted “Hollyweird” reprobates moronically speaking out against anything that someone has told them is inhumane treatment of animals, often while wearing furs and sporting alligator purses, etc. Treatment of animals is not “inhumane” because animals are not human and certainly are not men and were not created in that same image. If you choose to lower your standards to be equal to that of a filthy animal, have at it. None of this, however, stops the media from spreading and supporting the ignorance, hypocrisy and disgusting filth of Satan’s world. They are a large part of it.

I read an article yesterday that I just found so perverse I closed it out, because of my own desire to “come out of her.” And yet the topic and the approach bothered me. I feel it is important, if for no other reason, to try to expose the harvest of Satanic seed sowing. Perhaps, if just one person, can “come out of her” my tasks will not have been in vein.

The foundation of the article dealt with those upset because officials in British Columbia are killing wolves as part of their management plan partly to protect other threatened species, particularly those in danger from the actions of wolves. As is typically found in about 99.9% of media, we read about animals in a human context. The article isn’t clear as to the origins of the term, but those complaining use a term called a “Judas Wolf.” Evidently a Judas Wolf is some moron’s idea of one collared wolf used to “betray” the other wolves in his pack, i.e. giving up the location of the pack so government officials can more easily kill the wolves that need to be killed.

It’s not worth discussing the intellectual garbage offered by those who think animals are at or above the same social and ethical levels as man. Giving the action to kill wolves by the British Columbia government some sort of human characteristic, and in this case attempt to give it an extra bit of “umpf” by wrongly and ignorantly likening it to what tiny bit of Biblical history they might have remembered while studying to be a servant in Satan’s Service, is actually irrelevant. Scientific wolf management calls for the population control of wolves for the betterment of all species, including man, and it only makes sense that this task, like it or not, be carried out in the best way possible. If that results in using a collared wolf to locate the rest of the pack and destroying all in that pack, then so be it. Get over it. The wolves don’t know the difference…and I know for some this comes as a huge shock.

But here’s something that I don’t know just how much people can or want to see the disgusting nature of. In the article, it reads: “The wolf cull has been mired in controversy since it began. The province’s practice of using snipers in helicopters to gun down grey wolves has drawn criticism from the likes of pop star Miley Cyrus and film actress Pamela Anderson.”

This media outlet wants to support the idea that wolf management is not a good thing and so what better way to reveal their hand than to attempt to prop up their own perversion and misguided beliefs by invoking the names of two of the biggest and slimiest perverts of Hollyweird.

Somehow sane people are supposed to find comfort in having the support of Miley Cyrus and Pamela Anderson, standing up against sensible wildlife management? What? You can’t see my point? Miley Cyrus, once a Disney star (a great staging ground for Satan’s entertainment industry) has to her credit some of the most bizarre and perverse actions, enough to make any person with half a bag of morals vomit. She appears naked in public half of the time. She once staged an event where she, half clothed, appears to be giving Bill Clinton oral sex. She constantly grabs her crotch, kisses other women on the lips, eats fans underwear, and goes through the motions of having sex on stage (twerking).

Pamela Anderson, a woman who made her millions baring her breasts, is not much better. She once considered suicide because the renovations to one of her houses was costing too much and taking too long. All sane people think those things. She insists on only allowing her photograph to be taken by specific camera lenses, because those make her look better. She has tried suing people taking her picture with an “EYE” phone.

When you consider the combined mentality of these two bimbos and their entertainment history, only a brain-dead idiot would find any credibility in anything they had to say about wildlife management or even the treatment of animals. Perhaps the two would have more credibility if they went on stage and had sex with a wolf…but that would be inhumane treatment of the poor nasty dogs.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

“Can’t We All Just Get Along?”

The friend who created the photo below says that so long as the perverse marriage of Romance Biology and Environmental Voodoo (coined by Jim Beers) persists, with offspring that procreates, deer hunting (all hunting, trapping and fishing) will be “unrewarding and infrequent.”

Coexist

Share

When Government is in Control

Share

Timothy Treadwell Part Two

Share

“Gentle” Lion Eats Man in Front of Family and Others

Very Graphic!

Share

Can Animal Cams Help Stave Off Climate Change?

*Editor’s Note* – What non thinking insanity is rearing its ugly head in this country/world. No thought here is given to anything except the selfish desires of perverted animal lovers, caring only for their own greedy desires, as Techonzombies, to destroy the wild places real wild animals live, and promoting it as saving the planet. Can it get any more stupid?

If one is stupid enough to believe the utter nonsense that man is causing the planet to warm, then consider, if it’s at all possible, what exploiting wild animals with Web cameras is doing to destroy the planet. Do these inconvenient truths not matter to ignorant hypocrites out to satisfy their uncontrollable addictions to technology, believing another fake “scientist” when he/she says all of this will save the planet? It’s akin to Algore flying his private jet around telling you and I we must sacrifice in order that he can keep flying.

The mere promotion of more and bigger and better web/trail cameras demands more natural resources and the process to build them increases their so-called carbon footprint. Then consider disposal of these items once a better camera is made. What effect does that have on the planet?

In addition, because of trail cameras capturing events that cause mentally disordered people to demand something be done, how many hundreds of thousands of dollars and gallons and gallons of fossil fuels were spent to save a bear that had a trap around its neck? Do any of you think with more and more people watching animals that demands for more wasteful spending won’t increase? And with it the carbon footprint. That’s solving global warming?

This article claims that people will no longer need to travel great distances to see animals “in the wild” (Bwahahahahaha) because they can watch them on TV/cellphones/computers/”eye”pads. Is that a proven theory? If so, why not tear down all the sports stadiums in the country. People can sit at home and watch. Close down the national parks and wildlife preserves. Think of the money we can save by just locking the gates and let web cameras provide for entertainment. Close down New York’s Central Park. Just be there “virtually” and display it on the wall of your living room. SAVE THE DAMNED PLANET FOOL!

If you think for a moment people might not stay home, then perhaps you also need to consider that because people so much like what they are seeing on their computers, they just have to drive, fly, take a boat, whatever, and go see it in person. I contend intrusions into places people probably shouldn’t be, will increase. They sure don’t understand human nature…nor do they give three rat’s behinds about respecting nature.

It appears to me as a way to exploit wild animals for profit. If these con artists can propagandize enough stupid people, consider how much money stands to be made. TECHNOZOMBIES! Present on their electronic devices and they will do anything.

Oh, my! We ARE hopeless!

“It’s going to be much more what did the elephant see as it was walking through Nepal? What’s a black-and-white colobus seeing as it spends its day?” says Wilkie. “Cameras are going to get small enough and with mesh networks,” in which multiple computer users are wirelessly connected and share information, “even the forests could be connected. Rather than a gigantic transmitter, you’d have a tiny transmitter that just needs to talk to the nearest way station.”

Like many conservationists, Wilkie believes that developing new technology like this is critical to engaging the next generation of screen-savvy digital natives, even if it means they catch glimpses of nature’s bloodier side.“

Just caring about one individual is not going to solve our ecosystem-wide problems or may be somewhat of a distraction, but I would also argue that that passion can drive an entire societal ethic,” says Joel Dunn of Chesapeake Conservancy. “And that ethic leads to people that vote for politicians that will prioritize the environment, it helps them donate to groups like ours that try to protect these places and species, and it breeds the next generation of conservation leader.”

Source: Can Animal Cams Help Stave Off Climate Change? | Outside Online

Share

Stuck on Stupid

Selfies with bears, roping deer, loving a wolf and this. All cut from the same cloth I would say.

Share

It’s a Mad World

Colorado park stays closed because too many people are trying to take selfies with bears – source

“We’ve actually seen people using selfie sticks to try and get as close to the bears as possible, sometimes within 10 feet of wild bears,” said Brandon Ransom, Denver Water’s manager of recreation. Before it was closed, a bear chased a biker in the canyon.

Because Waterton Canyon has more than 100,000 visitors a year, its management is worried that these dangerous selfies would lead to a bear attack.
Perhaps it’s the dope heads who don’t know any better. I say let the pot heads alone. Let them take selfies. As a matter of fact, place signs directing them how to persuade the bear to come and take a group photo, placing the bear in the middle.

IDIOTS!

ObamaBear

Source:

Share

“Peaceful Islam”

WARNING!! Nudity in the video.

As in the words of George W. Bush and others, Islam is a peaceful religion. Yes, it and others, exude the essence of the leadership.

Share