August 18, 2019

The Long-Linked Chain of New-Science Ignorance and Brainwashing

ChainEvery newspaper that I read, every television show or newscast I watch, books, music, blogs, Facebook (although I don’t use it anymore), etc., for the informed, self-reliant. self-determined person, with an eye for direction upon The Creator, can rivet a long chain of linked events that should, but doesn’t, stir the very inner soul of man. Because most men are followers of and fearful of the “rulers in dark places” (Ephesians 6:12) and are unaware, the chain exists to drown life and the willfully blind. It is a roadblock that prevents seeing the Truth that can set a man free.

Where to begin?

I’ll set the stage with this. Recently a group of people, seemingly much more interested in the welfare of animals, particularly wolves, than man, met to: “…discuss, strategize and unite in building a coalition to address the need to reform wildlife management in America.”(emboldening added) And, what is it that this reformation intends to do? “…integrate the science of the 21st century and the ever-changing demographics and values of our citizenry.”(emboldening added)

This is “Progress.” The “science of the 21st century” is fake and useless garbage. The “ever-changing demographics and values” are corrupt and evil. Because a person’s values change, does not mean that change should be forced onto all others. Morals and ethics should be determined from the Word of God not some environmental group being propped up by the rulers in dark places.

It must be understood the meaning of such statements. These statements are not unique to just one wolf lovers’ group. It is the mantra of everything, but more specifically everything environmentalism. And it just didn’t happen. Nothing “just happens.” It is planned. The Vatican owns Environmentalism. Thus, one reason for the Pope’s recent Encyclical on Climate Change. The Vatican owns everything that intends to distort reality for its benefit at our expense.

One example of such is an organization called the National Training Laboratories(NTL). NTL is a byproduct of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations. Both Tavistock and NTL are “owned” by the Vatican. The purpose of NTL is to create “change agents.” These manufactured (brainwashed) “change agents” are purposed to go about changing the way we think. An example I just gave above is one organization whose mission is to “reform wildlife management,” shows the results of NTL and other Vatican-owned, Environmentalist and media manipulating efforts.

NTL’s vision, as stated, is the: “Creation and dissemination of new knowledge and practice.”

I’ve simply scratched the surface here. In order for readers to fully grasp the meaning of statements they are subjected to throughout the media, they must understand the source of those statements.

At present, all Environmentalist groups are making every effort to co-opt what was once the truth and “create and disseminate” it into THEIR new knowledge, their reformation of how wildlife management is discussed and carried out. It no longer matters that real scientific study confirms or denies. “Twenty-First Science” creates its own results.

Those who read the Bible should understand that this is a trick of Evil. We have been warned that in the Last Days, as Satan is allowed his grip on this earth, what was once right is now wrong, what was wrong is right, black is white, white is black, etc. Hard working, honest science, geared toward the discovery of scientific truths, has been replaced with Scientism (21st century science) – fake theories presented as “peer-reviewed” science.

With strong knowledge of the realities of deception, we can begin to look into the utter nonsense that is bombarding the non-thinking minds of Internet browsers, and all media readers. This inane approach to life’s logic is bizarre to the uncluttered mind. Take for example a representative of the perverse organization called the Humane Society of the United States (HSUS). HSUS attempted to get a referendum passed last year (2014) to effectively ban bear hunting in Maine. In response to a previous editorial, the representative of HSUS states that:

There’s a chance that some of the top-of-the-ticket Democrats who lost their races were adversely affected because they chose to oppose the ban on bear baiting. Large majorities of Democrats in the state favored the measure, and it didn’t help the candidates’ case that they supported an obviously inhumane and unsporting practice.

The actual editorial response makes as much sense as nothing. However, the point is here that this person, as with so many other people in this country, applaud the manipulation of the ballot box when it runs in their favor. When it does not, they scream for laws to stop “them” and not “us.” Somehow the bear referendum was defeated because democrats turned out in greater numbers but instead of voting HSUS’s way, did the typical, dishonest politician thing and lied to get votes. HSUS doesn’t do that? The idiocy is that this HSUS representative cannot see the difference. This is programmed idiocy by organizations founded on the principals of, “creation and dissemination of new knowledge and practice.”

Richard Fernandez, of Pajamas Media, tells us that Liberals control the media and those things that are “allowed” to be talked about.

“The significance of this asymmetry is that liberals have the power to legitimize the existence of problems. They can alone enter things into evidence, as it were. Max Ehrenfreund, writing in the Washington Post, has a gathered a list of discontents from various publications that are now being talked about even in liberal circles, which means the population at large can talk about them now. Liberals set the agenda, when they talk about things going down the tubes then it’s on the agenda.

This tactic is all part of the plan to, “creation and dissemination of new knowledge and practice.” The only way for Environmentalism to work, is that the Environmentalists must control the media. With this control, it is much easier to control everything else.

Animal Rights and Environmentalism isn’t about saving animals, the air and water. It’s about control. And thus, this is why the Pope wrote his Climate Change Encyclical. He no more believes that man is causing the climate to change. What he does understand, because he is part of the creation of fake Climate Change, is that with a convincing of man-caused climate change, he, the Vatican, has more power to control the people, the land, and the water. It’s about control!

We have been warned before. Robert Fanning, author of “Yellowstone is Dying” warned us that Environmentalists with much money and power were taking over the fight to protect wolves and promote a “creation and dissemination of new knowledge and practice,” because “[his] goal of wolf introduction was to drive 30,000 ranchers from public lands.”

The latest and most bizarre of all revelations of the coming out of brainwashed, perverted Environmentalists, has to be the media’s coverage of Cecil the Lion. Jimmy Kimmel crying over a lion being killed and death threats directed at hunters on Facebook, while Facebook claims saying things like, “I’ll come to your Dallas Safari Club with an AK47 and grenade and wipe the whole lot of you out!,” doesn’t violate their Community Standards – the point being because it isn’t part of the controlling liberal media agenda. (See Richard Fernandez’s article linked to above.)

They don’t talk about murdering unborn babies and evidently don’t talk about death threats when it involves a lion, any animal or the agenda of the Liberal Party. Here’s a world gone stark-raving mad!

Tyler O’Neil, of Pajamas Media, writes:

Those convinced the Inquisition died out hundreds of years ago may be surprised by the emergence of the all-powerful Twitter mob. While those found in violation of the tenets of the pope were rarely actually tortured or killed, death threats and career-ending protests now target our modern apostates, with a vehemence rarely seen since the Salem witch trials.

The elevation of “animal rights” to a semi-sacrosanct belief has taken many casualties, like the freedom and livelihood of a certain American dentist — but more on that later. Religious liberty, historic tradition, and even — ironically — the lives of animals have been taken hostage by this all-consuming movement.

It’s unfortunate this writer hasn’t a clue of reality and the Inquisition. Perhaps it would be a bit more politically correct, even for faux “conservatives,” to call it the neo-inquisition for it is alive and well. We are all so immersed into it, while we sleep, that we cannot see it.

All of this stuff is demented, evil crap. To think otherwise, means you’ve got it bad. Seriously, can people NOT see it is WRONG to believe an animal’s life is more valuable than that of man? Evidently it is so. How sad. Can people NOT see that “creating new science” to fit the 21st century is wrong? It’s flat out wrong, driven by greed, deception and the striving for power. This is NOT the work of God, my creator.

There is a long chain. The links have all been connected. The chain is so long and heavy, we can no longer do anything about it. Instead, we choose to step over it and around it, pretending it’s not there. Doing so will not make it go away. God’s knowledge can break those links.

Share

Animals Are “Its” Not “Whos”

I see this mistake made more and more each day that I spend reading accounts that involve animals. I’m not a grammar expert and don’t pretend to be. The reason I mention the fact that people are using the wrong subjective pronouns when referring to animals isn’t because I think they are ignorantly, grammatically incorrect but that they may be using the subject pronouns normally used for human beings to describe animals. More than likely this is due to ongoing brainwashing and propagandizing by those who believe that animals are equivalent to humans (or of higher esteem) and choose to use human-related subjective pronouns to further the perverted agenda of animal rights.

To cite a couple of recent examples of this, let me begin with an article I read from an outdoor writer WHO was writing about coyotes and their preying upon pets. He writes: “I saw a story on the news about a coyote who had attacked a young boy.” Proper use would have read: “I saw…coyote THAT…”

The author continues: “They are smart animals and have learned that they don’t need to fear those residents.” Using the plural subject pronoun intended for reference to humans, is incorrect and sends the wrong message to people about the role animals play on this planet. A correct usage should have been something like this: “Coyotes are smart animals and have learned not to fear residents.”

Still further in the article we read: “…trappers were called in and captured five coyotes, one of whom was – through a DNA test – confirmed to be the animal that attacked…” A man did not attack any kids. An animal did. IT was later captured. Perhaps the writer should have stated, “one was -through a DNA test…”

We also find, in reference to coyotes: “…all of them howling, The coyotes veered off before they got to me.” Correction: “all the coyotes were howling…The coyotes veered off before getting to me.”

We can find a headline in an online newspaper (by subscription) that reads: “Vet says dog who swam in Payette L. died from algae poisoning.” The article also references the dog (a female) as “she.” Because the dog is a female, doesn’t qualify it to be labeled a she. Bitch is the common name for a female dog.

The point of all this isn’t about grammar, because frankly, I don’t give a damn. What it’s about is the substitution of human-intended subjective pronouns where pronouns intended for objects should be used. Of course this is intended to promote the humanization of animals into our society; a perversion that has excelled at rapid speed in the most recent years.

Care to learn more about subjective pronouns?

Share

Forced Veganism: That World HAS Gone Mad

No wonder people like Obama want all Americans to go to college, regardless of whether they can afford it or it makes any sense for them personally or professionally. The leftist brainwashing taking place on college campuses is beyond anything you will see even from the media. Beliefs and attitudes are being installed by people like Professor Steven Best of the University of Texas at El Paso, whom the Chronicle of Higher Education describes as “one of the leading scholarly voices on animal rights.”

Source: Moonbattery » Professor’s Manifesto Calls for Terrorism to Impose Vegan “Abolitionism”

Share

Animal Alliance Wishes to Destroy the Wildlife They Claim to Love

A media campaign will ask tourists to stay away from B.C. because of wolf cull

Source: Animal Alliance targets B.C. tourism – Kimberley Daily Bulletin

Share

Animal “Rights” is About Abolition, Not Animal Cruelty, Says Responsible Pet Owners Alliance of Texas

Responsible Pet Owners Alliance Press Release Words can hurt you if you ignore these extremists!  They’ve been telling us their agenda to end all interaction with animals for years, but few believed them. Animal “rights” groups profess to work for improved animal treatment while their ultimate goal is to abolish the following: 1) breeding and ownership of pets; 2) use of animals in biomedical research; 3) raising farm animals for food, clothing, by-products such as insulin; 4) use of animals in education and entertainment, including zoos, aquariums, circuses and rodeos; and 5) all forms of hunting (including field trial competition, trapping and fishing), according to Capital Research Center.  http://capitalresearch.org Gary Francione and Tom Regan, “A Movement’s Means Create Its Ends,” were quoted in Animals’ Agenda: “There are fundamental and profound differences between the philosophy of animal welfare and that of animal rights …  Thus welfare […]

Source: Animal “Rights” is About Abolition, Not Animal Cruelty, Says Responsible Pet Owners Alliance of Texas | Canine Chronicle

Share

The War on Humans

Please somebody reassure me that the world has not gone completely insane!

Share

Then Just Give Up, Loser!

The master dichotomist, who wrongly divides untruths, seizes his own truth declaring all others wrong, is at it again. A few days ago, he told us that it was wrong to change the governing process to anything he was opposed to. Not that the Dichotomist is opposed to attempting to govern of and by the people but only if it fits a prescribed narrative that he embraces, evidently.

The other day, he attempted to convince readers of the Bangor Daily News that it is wrong to find ways of pushing back against the wrongful and perverted ways of the animal rights agenda by distorting the truth with a mission to mislead.

According to the Master Dichotomist, if Maine people teach their children to hunt, it will make them mass murderers. Very few sane people can make that connection.

In addition, he pretends to not understand that there is a difference between the Humane Society of the United States, and other perverted environmental and animal rights groups, marching into the State of Maine and setting up camp to change the way Maine people choose to live, and a grass roots organization in Maine seeking any help it can get from deeper-pocketed organizations to fight against the totalitarian socialists.

This is another example of why I choose to label these people as totalitarian socialists. Not only do they twist facts, they believe they control the process in which people can oppose the environmentalists’ slavery agenda. Any effort to oppose their agendas, meets with scoff and ridicule, attempting to place those in opposition, in actuality, the same realm as themselves – wrong to use the designed channels they have mastered to gain power and control.

The Master Dichotomist seems to intimate that the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine and all of those who might support the effort to increase the base of hunters in Maine by offering residents a chance to become involved in the Families Afield Program, as a futile effort. Because, he thinks hunting is a dinosaur, outdoor sportsmen should just give up and join the perverts who worship animals over humans.

Of the thirteen states that have an apprentice hunting program, Families Afield, the one-million new hunters have yet to step up as mass murderers.

Share

Idiocy Begets Idiocy

“The Portland Sea Dogs will not be serving Linda Bean’s Maine Lobster at Hadlock Field concession stands this season, according to a press release Monday from People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals.

David Byer, a spokesman for PETA, said the organization contacted the Sea Dogs during the 2014 season, showing team officials video footage of lobsters and crabs being processed at Bean’s Rockland plant in “crude and cruel methods.” He said PETA was told earlier this month of the team’s decision to stop selling the product.”<<<Read More>>>

Instead, let’s promote the practice of “crude and cruel methods” of murdering unborn babies, by ripping their legs and arms off while still alive, sticking needles in their heads or sucking them apart with a vacuum cleaner. PETA thinks that ripping live lobsters apart is “crude and cruel.” And yet I doubt they even consider the same treatment of humans as crude and cruel.

PETA is a fringe group of perverted freaks and so what does that say about the owners of the Portland Sea Dogs? If they intend to honor the perverse ideologue of PETA then I would have to seriously consider whether I would ever attend another Sea Dogs baseball game.

Share

Washington State Considers Criminalizing Holding Whales and Dolphins in Aquariums

Strategy Follows PETA’s Failed Litigation Campaign to Free Whales from “Bondage”

New York, NY/Washington DC – Washington state Senator Kevin Ranker introduced a bill last week to make it a crime, punishable by up to 6 months in jail and a $100,000 fine, to hold whales, dolphins or porpoises, known as cetaceans, in aquariums.

The following is a statement by Jeff Stier, head of the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Risk Analysis Division:

Radical animal activists don’t believe that humans should own animals or keep them in captivity, even for public educational purposes, even in tremendously large habitats.

When SeaWorld announced last year that it would double the size of its orca tanks to 10 million gallons, PETA attorney Jared Goodman issued a statement opposing the move, saying “A bigger prison is still a prison.” To Mr. Goodman and his anti-aquarium allies, all orcas, even those bred in captivity, should be “reunited” with their families in the open ocean.

PETA’s 2015 legislative approach, radical as it is, is certainly gaining more traction than its 2011 litigation strategy. Then, PETA filed suit in federal court in Southern California seeking to declare that SeaWorld’s whales are being held in slavery in violation of the 13th Amendment. The failed litigation sought a court-ordered release of the whales “from bondage.” CNN reported that the suit sought ‘a permanent order against holding them in slavery, as well as appointment of a legal guardian to carry out the transfer of the whales to a suitable habitat.’

Much of the impetus for the Washington state legislation under consideration, and similar bans that passed last year in New York state and San Francisco, was the advocacy film “Blackfish,” which aired nearly thirty times on CNN. CNN’s director of public relations, Jennifer Dargan, conceded to me that the film was “acquired” by the news organization and did not adhere to any of CNN’s journalistic standards.

Activists have recently blamed Walmart for obesity, SeaWorld for animal suffering and Uber for high transportation costs. The truth is, those who oppose the private sector economy and consumer choice will find villains regardless of the facts.

Jeffrey Ventre, who was fired from his job as a whale trainer at SeaWorld and has since enjoyed the limelight from his appearance in “Blackfish,” crowed that the recent legislation is the “proverbial writing on the wall” for an end to cetaceans in aquariums.

Ultimately, the radical animal activist agenda goes well beyond ending human interaction with animals outside of the wild – and zoos and aquariums as we know them. Some of these activists, who hold that animals aren’t property to be owned by humans, argue that we shouldn’t be allowed to own pets.

As one commenter on Twitter put it, “I see a Pixar’s ‘WALL-E’-type world looming in the near future.”
The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non- partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations, and less than two percent from corporations. It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 96,000 active recent contributors.

Contributions are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated.

Share

Just Say No to Welfare Bears

BearDreamingofDonutsConfucius once said, “Real knowledge is to know the extent of one’s ignorance.” And yet again George Bernard Shaw once said, “Beware of false knowledge; it is more dangerous than ignorance.” What’s even worse is being ignorant and having the confidence to show it. Mark Twain said that you only need two things in life to be a success; “ignorance and confidence.” That is why for many who will read anything that I write will claim I am the one who is ignorant and their truth is the truth that will lead them to successes beyond their wildest dreams….with confidence. Wildest, yes, but never anything that they dreamed of.

I don’t believe it takes a political expert, whatever the hell that is, to come to the conclusion that the majority of people who would sell their souls to Satan for animal welfare, are members of the same group that like to call themselves liberal and progressive. And thus would support and defend the welfare state; “From each according to his ability, to each according to his need.”

Let’s gander for a moment into animal welfare as it may pertain to black bears. In reality, it matters not the species of plant or animal. Environmentalists preach the “natural” and “balanced” way of doing things. These leftist, animal welfare, non thinkers harp to anyone who will listen that if man would just butt out of the equation of ecosystem (whatever that is) health and well-being, all would be Kumbaya.

Even after those who fabricated the theory of “natural balance” have since withdrew that claim, based of course on “best available science” (snickering here), the animal welfare activist and promoter of “let nature take its course and everything will be alright,” will cling confidently to their old-found supposition in order to show their own ignorance, confidently, but only to those intelligent enough to know the difference. For the majority, it has no meaning and that’s why it continues.

The Humane Society of the United States (HSUS) and their grand followers of confident ignoramuses, are proudly showing the world that they want the citizens of Maine, and other states, to stop treating bears inhumanely – hunters shoot them and eat them. GASP! The same flock of parrots preach ethics. I’m reminded of the words of Jesus (that would be the real, one and only, Son of God, the Creator of all things) when He said to the mass of confident, ignoramuses, eager to throw stones at and kill a woman because she was a prostitute, “He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.”(John 8:7) My thoughts here are that Jesus didn’t think the stone-throwing sinners were exercising good ethics.

Obviously, and it is a shame I have to explain this, I have my doubts that anyone mixed up with HSUS, is much interested in “stoning” a bear hunter, but then again……

Somewhere lost in this progressive paradigm of animal protection to extremes, people have determined to make humans second class citizens. Animals come first. And yet, out of one corner of their mouths they confidently believe themselves to be compassionate humans toward other humans by offering somebody’s money (tax dollars), not their own, to go to support humans who say they can’t take care of themselves. Can’t take care of themselves? Later.

A reader sent me the following statement found on the Mainers For Fair Bear Hunting Facebook page. By the way there is nothing to do with Mainers in this group of Totalitarians as the entire group is funded by out-of-state interests and the HSUS.

The update pertains to a gathering of confident, ignorant, hypocrites to bring attention to the onset of Maine’s bear hunting season. In the update it says, “For 30 days, bears are trained to visit these sites for free food, seemingly with no strings attached.” There are confident outcries among the masses. I’m sure the gatherers will be chanting, “No more welfare for bears!”

Perhaps I should take that statement and just change three words. I’ll delete “30 days” and replace it with “years” and change “bears” to “people.” The statement would read, “For years, people are trained to visit these sites for free food, seemingly with no strings attached.”

On the one hand, God created man and gave him the brains and ability to take care of himself, i.e. work, grow and find food, shelter, etc. On the other hand, God created the beasts of field in order that man could have dominion over those beast, to care for and perpetuate growth for people to eat and use all the resources the animals can offer.

The confident cloud dwellers of the HSUS and other environmentalist movement groups demand that animals should be left alone, in their “natural” state (although their own ignorance don’t know what that means). Doing so will bring justice to the animal kingdom.

However, a man, a human, should have more ability to take care of himself than a damned bear and yet HSUS and others believe bears should be left to their own devices, without man’s interference (of course only when that interference involves hunting, fishing and trapping). Where is the outcry from those confident protestors toward those who spend years training others to “visit these sites for free food (health care, education, money and shelter), seemingly with no strings attached.”? What the hell is “natural” about that?

Isn’t there something seriously wrong with this?

Share