December 12, 2017

Filth and Decadence to Prop Up Wolf Protection

It’s the way of the world. Filthy and perverted “Hollyweird” reprobates moronically speaking out against anything that someone has told them is inhumane treatment of animals, often while wearing furs and sporting alligator purses, etc. Treatment of animals is not “inhumane” because animals are not human and certainly are not men and were not created in that same image. If you choose to lower your standards to be equal to that of a filthy animal, have at it. None of this, however, stops the media from spreading and supporting the ignorance, hypocrisy and disgusting filth of Satan’s world. They are a large part of it.

I read an article yesterday that I just found so perverse I closed it out, because of my own desire to “come out of her.” And yet the topic and the approach bothered me. I feel it is important, if for no other reason, to try to expose the harvest of Satanic seed sowing. Perhaps, if just one person, can “come out of her” my tasks will not have been in vein.

The foundation of the article dealt with those upset because officials in British Columbia are killing wolves as part of their management plan partly to protect other threatened species, particularly those in danger from the actions of wolves. As is typically found in about 99.9% of media, we read about animals in a human context. The article isn’t clear as to the origins of the term, but those complaining use a term called a “Judas Wolf.” Evidently a Judas Wolf is some moron’s idea of one collared wolf used to “betray” the other wolves in his pack, i.e. giving up the location of the pack so government officials can more easily kill the wolves that need to be killed.

It’s not worth discussing the intellectual garbage offered by those who think animals are at or above the same social and ethical levels as man. Giving the action to kill wolves by the British Columbia government some sort of human characteristic, and in this case attempt to give it an extra bit of “umpf” by wrongly and ignorantly likening it to what tiny bit of Biblical history they might have remembered while studying to be a servant in Satan’s Service, is actually irrelevant. Scientific wolf management calls for the population control of wolves for the betterment of all species, including man, and it only makes sense that this task, like it or not, be carried out in the best way possible. If that results in using a collared wolf to locate the rest of the pack and destroying all in that pack, then so be it. Get over it. The wolves don’t know the difference…and I know for some this comes as a huge shock.

But here’s something that I don’t know just how much people can or want to see the disgusting nature of. In the article, it reads: “The wolf cull has been mired in controversy since it began. The province’s practice of using snipers in helicopters to gun down grey wolves has drawn criticism from the likes of pop star Miley Cyrus and film actress Pamela Anderson.”

This media outlet wants to support the idea that wolf management is not a good thing and so what better way to reveal their hand than to attempt to prop up their own perversion and misguided beliefs by invoking the names of two of the biggest and slimiest perverts of Hollyweird.

Somehow sane people are supposed to find comfort in having the support of Miley Cyrus and Pamela Anderson, standing up against sensible wildlife management? What? You can’t see my point? Miley Cyrus, once a Disney star (a great staging ground for Satan’s entertainment industry) has to her credit some of the most bizarre and perverse actions, enough to make any person with half a bag of morals vomit. She appears naked in public half of the time. She once staged an event where she, half clothed, appears to be giving Bill Clinton oral sex. She constantly grabs her crotch, kisses other women on the lips, eats fans underwear, and goes through the motions of having sex on stage (twerking).

Pamela Anderson, a woman who made her millions baring her breasts, is not much better. She once considered suicide because the renovations to one of her houses was costing too much and taking too long. All sane people think those things. She insists on only allowing her photograph to be taken by specific camera lenses, because those make her look better. She has tried suing people taking her picture with an “EYE” phone.

When you consider the combined mentality of these two bimbos and their entertainment history, only a brain-dead idiot would find any credibility in anything they had to say about wildlife management or even the treatment of animals. Perhaps the two would have more credibility if they went on stage and had sex with a wolf…but that would be inhumane treatment of the poor nasty dogs.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Animal Alliance Wishes to Destroy the Wildlife They Claim to Love

A media campaign will ask tourists to stay away from B.C. because of wolf cull

Source: Animal Alliance targets B.C. tourism – Kimberley Daily Bulletin

Share

Mile 462 Alaska Highway

This is where travelers can find the Northern Rockies Lodge.

RockiesLodge

Photo by Al Remington

Share

Mowing The Grass

In British Columbia

Buffalo2

Photo by Al Remington

Share

Insanity Prevails in Decision to Kill British Columbia Wolves Killing Caribou

As many as 184 wolves must be shot in British Columbia, Canada, in order to save the caribou, according to a statement from the provincial government. The Ministry of Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations announced plans on January 15 to address what they consider the threat of wolf predation in the areas of the South Selkirk Mountains and the South Peace, along the border of US states Washington and Idaho.<<<Read More>>>

Share

Bears in Canada on the Rise Along with Applications for Gun Permits for Protection From Bears

Are Canadians bad at keeping records of bear attacks on humans? This recent article indicates that data provided by provinces are unreliable and can’t be trusted. What is interesting though is that because there appears to be some scrutiny about the accuracy of bear attack data, there exists more concern by more people because of an ever increasing number of bear/human encounters across North America; enough that Environment Yukon is now keeping an updated “Bear Incident Map.” And for those interested, there’s this study of accounts of black bear attacks on humans in North America from 1900 – 2009.

And then we find that applications to carry a handgun in Alberta and British Columbia have gone through the roof and driving that demand is the increase in human/bear encounters.

Share

16,180 Human-Bear Conflicts in One Year

“The Conservation Officer Service is British Columbia’s primary responder to human-wildlife conflicts where there is a risk to public safety, conservation concerns, or where significant property damage has occurred.

In 2013-14, the Conservation Officer Service received 28,063 calls regarding human-wildlife conflicts. Of those calls, 16,180 involved human-bear conflicts. During this same period, the total number of black bear and grizzly bear calls were down slightly from the previous year.

Over the past five years in B.C., an average of 658 black bears have been destroyed each year, while 91 have been relocated due to conflicts with people.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Rally to Stop B.C. Trophy Bear Hunt

“I realized that when we go out on location this spring it will be the same time as the spring trophy hunt starts again. It’s just appalling to me. It breaks my heart to think that one day we’re working with these bears and shooting them with our cameras, and the very next day trophy hunters can show up and shoot them with their high-powered rifles.”<<<Read More>>>

Share