November 20, 2019

Thought for Discussion Today

Most people will concur that climate change is ongoing and a “natural” phenomenon. Too many people actually believe that climate change is man-caused and occurs mostly through the generation of carbon dioxide and other, so-called, greenhouse gases. Here is my thoughtful question which can be discussed in the comments section.

Environmentalists always portray the effects of a so-called warming planet in a negative light only. As it may pertain to animals, this same negative harping exists. Surely there are just as many positive results from global warming as there are negative, but they are seldom, if ever, discussed. Do you agree?

Share

General Article of the Uniform Code of Climate Change Justice

………….Or something!

For those not aware, there exists the Uniform Code of Military Justice. This is used by the United States Military for law and order. For those who are or have served in the Military, they probably are aware of the famed, General Article, i.e Article 134. It is often laughed about because it’s historic use has always been to cover all those things not covered in the rest of the uniform codes. If you must know, Article 134 states:

Though not specifically mentioned in this chapter, all disorders and neglects to the prejudice of good order and discipline in the armed forces, all conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the armed forces, and crimes and offenses not capital, of which persons subject to this chapter may be guilty, shall be taken cognizance of by a general, special, or summary court-martial, according to the nature and degree of the offense, and shall be punished at the discretion of that court.

Like I said. It’s a collect-all, gotcha kind of law for, well……just in case. When you think you have out-foxed the military, BAM! They will slap Article 134 on you.

For those with an athlete’s mentality, perhaps the universal code of coaches will better give you understanding:

Rule #1 – The coach is always right.
Rule #2 – See Rule #1.

Is this what it’s come to as far as climate change goes?

Rich Lowry of the National Review now calls the weasels who refuse to let go of their blind worship of the evils of man-caused global warming, “Climate Deniers.” He defines these climate deniers as, “all those advocates of limits on carbon emissions who are so certain of the science that they have no interest in the latest evidence.”

That’s nothing new. I think we just didn’t have a name for them….or least names writers were willing to publish. But consider what one of these “settled science” promoters and “climate deniers” is saying about why there has been no global warming for over a decade.

Now, just four years later, he [James Hansen] is arguing that all the new coal-fired plants have saved the planet from more global warming, by “fertilizing” the biosphere and creating aerosols that are a global coolant.

How do you discuss anything with anyone so embroiled in their man-caused global warming creed, that regardless of what any facts say, there’s always, if not a general article (excuse), a convenient one that will always explain man’s evil while exempting themselves from any wrong.

Who knows? Perhaps Hansen is right and coal-fired power plants are doing that, but isn’t his claim providing even more support for the fact that we don’t know enough about global climate change to declare the “science is settled,” while moving forward with draconian regulations of carbon dioxide emissions, carbon taxes, etc.?

When we read about instances such as this one, we then should seriously be asking ourselves about whether there should be background checks done on scientists. After all, isn’t some of this stuff, if not criminal, it certainly comes very close.

Share

Maine Audubon Pushing Their “Climate Change”

Ignorance abounds and that’s the kind of fodder that organizations like Audubon feast on in promoting their agenda-driven Marxist dogma.

The ignorance is unfortunate but it is actually perpetuated by water-muddying environmentalists who do not want people to know or understand facts and truth because that would put an end to their money making con job they are pulling on the people.

There are many and very distinct aspects of climate change, but never in any discussions that I have read or been a part of, has anyone taken a bit of extra time to expound on the differences and why it’s important to separate all issues and aspects.

Climate change, where once was generically referred to as global warming, is always used in an all-encompassing way to disparage the human race, while accusing man of being the culprit of changes in our climate. Seldom, if ever, was there even any attempts to define the deviations between natural changes and those, if any, caused by man and proven as such. Most people do not know there is a difference and this falls nicely into the hands of emotion-seeking blood suckers who promote man-caused climate changes.

Most fail to understand and certainly are not taught by those appearing to be concerned about climate, that there is a marked difference between weather, climate, proven science, modeled science, theories, differences in carbon dioxide and air and water pollutants, and the real effects all other things have on our climate. Al Gore acted nearly in a criminal way and has done more to dislodge any credibility in climate science by declaring “the science is settled”. How unfortunate. Science is never “settled” and shouldn’t be. Otherwise, how will we progress?

But, environmentalists have an agenda and it isn’t about finding the truth on what really does effect our climate and therefore they will continue to perpetuate all the lies that restrict scientific study and do what they can to play off the emotions of ignorant people and put more and more money in their banks.

The Maine Audubon will sponsor Maine State Climatologist George Jacobson in a speaking role to discuss climate change, or at least that’s the terminology that will be used. If you are hoping Mr. Jacobson might offer something refreshing and truthful, instead of the worn out verbosity of the global warming cultists, don’t hold your breath. Comments, like those published in the Bangor Daily News, let’s us know that Maine Audubon and George Jacobson are carrying on with global warming as the fault of man.

Climate changes driven by our activities, especially the use of fossil fuels, will be the great global challenge for the next few generations. How we adapt to largely unprecedented conditions will determine the fate of not just natural ecosystems, but even our own social order.

Share

Message From NASA Scientists to NASA: Hey, Quit Lying About Man-Made Global Warming

Fifty top scientists, astronauts, and engineers who have worked for NASA had a message for them recently:

“We, the undersigned, respectfully request that NASA and the Goddard Institute for Space Studies (GISS) refrain from including unproven remarks in public releases and websites. We believe the claims by NASA and GISS that manmade carbon dioxide is having a catastrophic impact on global climate change are not substantiated, especially when considering thousands of years of empirical data.

Share

Uh Oh! Scientists Say No Need to Panic About Untenable Claims of Destructive Global Warming

No Need to Panic About Global Warming
There’s no compelling scientific argument for drastic action to ‘decarbonize’ the world’s economy.

Editor’s Note: The following has been signed by the 16 scientists listed at the end of the article:

A candidate for public office in any contemporary democracy may have to consider what, if anything, to do about “global warming.” Candidates should understand that the oft-repeated claim that nearly all scientists demand that something dramatic be done to stop global warming is not true. In fact, a large and growing number of distinguished scientists and engineers do not agree that drastic actions on global warming are needed.<<<Read the Rest>>>

Share