October 14, 2019

PETA Kills 88% of Dogs and Cats

Here we go again. A report filed by Infowars, states that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) killed 88% of the dogs and cats they had taken in to “care for.”

PETA is a puke because they are lying hypocrites. As the article points out PETA hauls in millions of dollars, over $51 million last year, by promoting no animal killing and for “ethical” treatment of animals. (Ethics is what you do when nobody is looking, right? Ooops! Somebody peeked.)

So, here is where I am going to have everybody hating me. PETA supposedly took in 2,626 pets last year and killed 88% of them. Good for them. This country is overrun with dogs and cats. Oh yes, some people take very good care of their pets, yada, yada, yada but far too many people don’t. If people really loved their pets, they would do more to make sure that we aren’t overrun with nasty, rotten, disease-ridden pets. But they don’t. As a matter of fact, it is because of organizations like PETA and the Humane Society of the United States, that there are so many pets to begin with.

Let’s get rid of a few hundred thousands and better control and take care of the ones we have.

Share

Cats Kill Birds – Dogs Become Non Essential Wolf Populations

According to J.R. Absher, editor of “The Birding Wire”, abandoned and feral cats are free to roam about killing birds by the billions. He says that many of these cats are unwilling participants in a program called Trap-Neuter-Vaccinate-Release (TNVR). While this may slow down the growth of feral cats, they still eat birds and the birders don’t like it. I wonder why that is?

Some are asking why is it acceptable to not have stray dogs running around but it is for cats. Absher asks:

The thought of permitting – and encouraging – packs of stray and ownerless dogs in our communities wouldn’t gain a whit of support from city councils or county commissions. So why on earth promote it for cats, given the wealth of evidence that it’s unhealthy, harmful, and so devastating to songbirds and ground nesters?

Perhaps I have a few answers for Mr. Absher. First of all, dogs are worshiped and cats are only “loved.” Dogs are bigger than cats, most of the time, and thus the adage, “out of sight out of mind.” Cats kill and eat mice too, and we know that mice don’t have as many rights as say dogs, i.e. coyotes and wolves. It’s okay to kill mice. Nobody wants them. Nobody “loves” them and I don’t think anybody worships them…..although Michael Jackson sang a song once about a rat named Ben.

Perhaps more people should buy and read the book, “101 Things to Do With a Dead Cat.” Ever see a book called, “101 Things to Do With a Dead Dog?” Didn’t think so.

If I post a picture of dead dog on my website, thousands of sick and demented individuals leave some of the most disgusting comments imaginable. When I post a picture of a dead cat, nobody cares. I have always said that if you want to kill your kids and get away with it, move to Florida. But, if you mess with your dog in the Sunshine State, they’ll give you the death penalty.

But running to Absher’s defense, so far I’ve avoided addressing his claim that people wouldn’t put up with disease-infested dogs running around communities terrorizing people. And he’s 100% right. They deserve special protected status. What the U.S. Government, i.e. the United State Fish and Wildlife Service does is take those feral dogs, lock them up in a remote pen somewhere for awhile and then release them into people’s back yards claiming them to be a non essential experimentation of “wolves”, pure breeds, creating a “distinct population segment” and then protecting them so they can legally spread disease and kill off all the wildlife….like cats are doing with birds.

I would suggest that if J.R. Absher and others want to get these cats off the street, get with some of those brilliant faux scientists at the USFWS and claim those cats to be a rare species of cats that needs protecting. Then people will be more tolerant and there would be no problems.

I can think of species like, mini catamount, or toy tiger. Hey maybe I’m on to something.

I’m from the government and I’m here to help.

Share

Who’s Giving Away a Cat for Free? Must Be PETA

FreeCat

Maybe USFWS is planning to “reintroduce” these kitties into Yellowstone. Great idea!

Share

Kitty Cats Missing – Searching for Explanation

In a small mid-Maine town, at least six people’s cats have come up among the missing, according to the Bangor Daily News. The owners of the cats are searching for both cats and an explanation for a seemingly odd and mysterious vanishing. I don’t think it’s all that odd.

Among some of the theories being talked about in this article as to what or who to blame, are foxes and mountain lions, and yet no mention of any member of the canine species other than the fox.

Of course there could be some pervert living in or visiting the neighborhood who has some kind of cat fetish, dead or alive, or maybe even an acquired taste for the little felines. However, it is, more than likely, the result of some larger predator/killer that’s hungry and/or very opportunistic.

There are no fewer than two sure bets when it comes to wild critters: they will always be hungry and they will always have to compete with man, mostly for space but also for food. There’s not a lot that can be done about space, although we try. Yeah, some say that man is swallowing up these critters’ habitat and that encroachment is ruining the dietary plans of some of these animals. While true, to some degree, I wonder if anyone has ever conducted a study that shows how man’s encroachment on the forests, fields and deserts, has increased usable habitat and foraging opportunities for wild animals, including birds? I’ll bet there’s a tradeoff, especially when you consider there are many more species of wild animals in this country than at any other time in recorded history.

All wild animals compete for habitat and food, whether with their own kind or another wild animal. In its most basic form, rational thinking will tell us that if there’s a food shortage, competition increases. On the same token, if the population of certain species increases, so does the competition for food. God forbid both happen at the same time.

Wild animals are, for the most part, opportunistic hunters/foragers. Let’s face it, our own human instinct is to go where we can get something we like to eat in the easiest possible manner available to us. Wild animals are no different.

If, as humans, we provide protection and food for wild animals, either intentionally or not, we will have visitors, some of which we might wish we didn’t have, as may be the explanation for missing cats.

Generally speaking, if wild critters have all the room they need and all the food to eat within that space, we as busy humans seldom, if ever, see them. It’s when circumstances change that six people will lose their cats, all in short period of time.

It sounds from reading the article that most of these kidnapped cat owners let their pets outside and unattended. This has probably been the norm and none have ever had much cause to think otherwise. If the cats became dinner fare for some predator/varmint, chances are something in the region changed that forced the wild critters to go seeking prey elsewhere.

We, as humans, can’t do much about changing natural circumstances that alter the behavior of wild animals, but we can do something about being responsible for managing specie populations to reduce these kinds of conflicts but more importantly to provide for healthy wildlife.

There will always be anomalies when dealing with the natural world, and this one occurrence may be just that. When it becomes a common event, chances are habitat is dwindling but more than likely populations are increasing. This happens mostly due to over-protection of a species. Over-protection is irresponsible behavior and does little good for the animal species and as a result, we see increases in the negative kinds of human/wildlife encounters. We also will usually see animal disease and starvation.

One example of what Maine citizens can do is not get caught up in the emotional rhetoric being provided by the Humane Society of the United States and the Wildlife Alliance of Maine, who want to effectively ban all methods necessary to properly and responsibly manage the black bear population.

As things stand at present, Maine has a very large and growing population of black bears. The ONLY humane methods of keeping those populations in check is through hunting and trapping. If those are removed, negative encounters between bears and humans will increase. Some of those encounters are sure to be tragic and, of course, unnecessary.

I’m not sure that kitty cats are at the top of the list of dietary delights for Ursus Americanus but taken to hunger due to a loss of food and/or population growth and competition, a bear will eat most anything it can get its paws onto……including humans.

Maine citizens should be thanking hunters and trappers for the healthy wildlife we all enjoy. In combination with intelligent wildlife management science, and the implementation of the North American Model of Wildlife Management, an historically proven method of responsible wildlife management, all Maine citizens get to enjoy the results.

Nobody wants to see our own and/or our neighbors pets disappearing. One way to help ensure this doesn’t happen is to make sure that the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife never have their hands tied up to a point where it prevents them from doing the best jobs they can in caring for our wild animals. Don’t let politics and private agendas dictate scientific wildlife management.

Share

PETA Kills Over 89% of Adoptable Animals in Care

Despite its $36 million budget, PETA employees make little effort to find homes for the thousands of animals they kill every year. PETA President Ingrid Newkirk previously indicated to The Virginian-Pilot that the animal rights group could stop killing pets, but it would mean cutting down on press stunts and celebrity photo shoots: “We could become a no-kill shelter immediately. It means we wouldn’t do as much work.”<<<Read More from Center for Consumer Freedom>>>

Share

Breaking News! Giant Cat Threatens Maine’s Deer Herd

You will first need to spot the two bright eyes in the lower left of the screen and then prepare yourself for the attack.

Share