November 21, 2017

Settling the Science by Force

ClimateSkepticism

Photo Courtesy of The People’s Cube

Share

Critical Thinking on Climate Change

Empirical Evidence to Consider Before Taking Regulatory Action and Implementing Economic Policies – September 4, 2014

Introduction:

When this report was first introduced in July of 2013, a number of important assertions were being made in the public forum, particularly on Capitol Hill, that were wholly factually and scientifically inaccurate. The original version of the report, as well as the expert scientific testimony provided to Congress in the interim, was meant to be helpful in limiting some of the more egregious claims that were being perpetuated. Unfortunately, much of the public discourse on important issues related to climate science has devolved into name-calling, including terminology such as “denier” or “dirty denier.”1 Both have connotations which frequent use of is counter-productive to an honest public discussion involving a matter of such incredible scientific and economic importance. No scientific discussion that requires precision, particularly when it relates to issues as complex as climate science, should utilize means to limit debate and understanding when critical evaluation is necessary.

Additional events that have transpired since the first version of this report was introduced clarify the need for providing some basic level scientific facts that are important to understanding carbon dioxide’s (CO2) role in our environment. Certain media figures have gone so far as to try and discredit the basic science of photosynthesis2 and our understanding of the impacts of anthropogenic CO2. Such mischaracterization does an additional disservice to the understanding of this important greenhouse gas and related policy making.

To rectify some of the challenges in ensuring additional factors based on empirical evidence were understood, this report has been updated to include the following:

1. A new section has been added on the benefits of CO2.
2. Wildfires and forestry management have garnered additional public attention of late, and so was split into its own section with additional information.
3. A new section has been added on the impacts European countries have seen as a result of their climate regulations.
4. A new section has been added on Polar Bear populations and claims of mass extinctions.
5. Nearly all sections have been updated with new information.
6. An addendum was added to provide examples of how the Obama Administration’s National Climate Assessment report ignores critical scientific evidence when submitted by top researchers and scientists.

Four former Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrators testified before the EPW Committee in 2014 and provided important answers to questions for the record as it relates to basic CO2 science, economics, and EPA regulations:<<<Read Full Report>>>

Share

Want to Know the Truth about the Earth’s Climate?

Many citizens believe the United Nations and the US government can no longer be trusted to tell them the truth about climate change? Do you want to know the truth for your next research paper, your next newscast or newspaper column, for your family’s sake, because your business is affected by climate change, or you are a responsible governing official? Then you need the only authoritative, accurate, quarterly climate report available in the United States – the Global Climate Status Report (GCSR)©
The GCSR is the only source document you will need to get you through the fog of climate change. It is clear, concise, and contains no-nonsense assessments of exactly what the true status of the Earth’s climate really is and where it is heading. It is based on facts and not the political correctness of the day.

The Global Climate Status Report is from a leading climate research organization, the Space and Science Research Corporation (SSRC), in Orlando, Florida.

Climate change data in the GCSR is compiled from the world’s best sources of satellite and ground station climate data and measures the planet’s climate status using 24 different climate parameters.
World class expertise is brought to bear in the GCSR’s publication using distinguished scientists and other experts from around the world.

The GCSR is edited by Mr. John L. Casey, SSRC President. He is a former White House and NASA Headquarters advisor, author of the internationally acclaimed climate book, “Cold Sun,” and was named “America’s best climate prediction expert” by Watchdogwire.com in 2013.

Here is what the experts are saying about the GCSR: “Whether it’s global sea levels or the next climate change to a long cold epoch, the Global Climate Status Report is an exciting document for university libraries as well as schools and ordinary people wanting to find real observational facts instead of lobbying illusions.”

Dr. Nils-Axel Morner World Renowned Global Sea Level Expert
“The correlation between cold climate periods and major earthquakes and volcanic activity is quite strong. The Global Climate Status Report is the only US published climate report that covers this relationship and otherwise provides for the world’s citizens a clear statement of the Earth’s climate status, where the data is not colored by politics.”

Dr. Dong Choi, Australia Director of Research International Earthquake and Volcano Prediction Center
“As Co-Editor of the GCSR, I believe this report is giving everyone what they have needed for years – an authoritative, fact-based, non-political coverage of the planet’s climate using numerous parameters for measurement. I am proud to be part of this important document that allows both scientist, educator or the average person a chance to understand what is happening with the Earth’s climate and why.” Dr. Ole Humlum Professor of Physical Geography University of Oslo, Norway
“The SSRC continues to be a shining light of truth about the Earth’s climate and more importantly where it is going to be decades from now. For example, there is no other climate research organization in the United States that is dedicated to telling us the truth about the coming cold climate and the need to prepare for it. If anyone, especially in the media or government wants to know the climate status of our planet there is only one reliable source, the Global Climate Status Report. If anyone wants to write an accurate article on the Earth’s climate, they better have the GCSR at their side.” Dr. Rich Swier, Citizen Journalist (drrichswier.com)

In addition to the factual coverage of the Earth’s climate status, the 4-2013 Edition of the GCSR also includes a tongue-in-cheek commentary by Mr. Casey about the President’s November 1, 2013 Executive Order on climate change. Climate researcher and author Robert Felix, whose books include “Not by Fire, But by Ice,” and “Magnetic Reversals and Evolutionary Leaps,” has described Mr. Casey’s review of the Executive Order as “…a fantastic article! Great writing! A perfect combination of wit, sarcasm, opinion, and fact.”
*******************************

To get your copy of the Global Climate Status Report now, just go on line to the SSRC web site at: www.spaceandscience.net and download it from the “Publications” page. Pick up the current December 2013 quarterly edition of the GCSR TODAY!

Don’t want to pay for it on line at $6.95? Just send a check payable to the “SSRC” for $9.88 to: SSRC, P.O. Box 607841, Orlando, FL 32860 along with your return address. Write “GCSR” in the check memo line. You will receive a bound printed copy in return (US delivery only).
Don’t want the report but want to help the SSRC? Please send a non-deductible donation.
DON’T BE CAUGHT OUT IN THE COLD ALONE WITHOUT YOUR COPY OF THE GCSR!

Share

Seriously Busted!: The Final Nail in the Coffin That Destroys a Fabricated “Hockey Stick” Graph on Global Warming

“Hide the Decline”, became a catch phrase a couple years ago, when leaked emails began to surface that seemed to implicate certain climate scientists and research facilities who purposely withheld specific climate data in order to fabricate a graph that would show a steep increase in global temperatures over the past 150-200 years.

Michael Mann’s “Hockey Stick Graph” became the most famous as the media and others scarfed this up as proof that man was destroying the planet and serious things needed to be done. Almost everyone fell for it.

It has taken a lot of time and effort but finally all of the needed information has been collected to once and for all prove that climate scientists intentionally removed specific tree growth data for the purpose of producing a false result that would wrongly influence climate science and arm the political parasites looking to exploit for profit.

If you read nothing else on climate science and global warming, please read the Bishop Hill Blog. This story is detailed and carries the complete chronology from beginning to end. This IS the smoking gun.

As you will see in the graph below, the black ink represents Michael Mann’s infamous “Hockey Stick”, like the one portrayed above. This represents the result of cherry picked data in order to produce a graph that looks exactly as this one does. Along with this black ink is also green ink. The green ink in the graph depicts what it would look like if all the data intended to be used in the research had been used. As you can see, there is an unmistakeable difference.

Tom Remington

Share