August 21, 2019

Good Riddance (and don’t let the door hit you in the…)

by James Beers

Two years ago I wasted quite a bit of time opposing the Minnesota DNR decree to impose a ban on using any lead ammunition on State Wildlife Areas.  During this thorough waste of time (it was a simple government decree in a decree-friendly state based on nonsense with no possibility of any change from the get-go) I trekked to downtown St. Paul to the DNR Headquarters for a “Hearing” and a chance to “testify”.

What a circus. The 40 or 50 attendees were divided by sex and costumes.  On “my” half sat males over 50 sitting in groups of friends all decked out in wool shirts; they were the opposition.  On the other half sat a gaggle of females under 50 that probably thought that a gunstock was something listed on the Stock Exchange: they were obviously all acquainted with each other and each was decked out in “professional” clothes suitable for CEO-level executives recently departed from their offices or some expensive urban watering hole for this important meeting; they were the supporters of the ban.

There were a few anomalies in the female supporters group.  First there was the DNR “chief” that obviously knew each lady and wandered amongst them like a movie star.  Then there was the old man dressed in impeccable Orvis duds that looked real “outdoorsy” as he self-identified as a “hunter”.

Last but not least was an older lady in fairly grubby clothes that identified herself and her plea as an “Eagle Rescue biologist”.  Her emotional “testimony”, that was allowed to exceed the time limit unlike the rest of us, was full of tales of Bald eagles injured by “hunters” and brought to her Rescue venue located on a heavily used wintering eagle stretch of the Mississippi.  She even shared X-rays of eagles showing “lead” pellets that were “killing them”.  She received an ovation at her conclusion.

What she failed to mention was that the fact of lead or some other pellet metal was immaterial; lead pellets or bullets imbedded in muscle or other non-organ tissue is benign.  You or I or an eagle or a loon or a duck for that matter so afflicted may live a long life or die soon depending on the wound, not the presence of lead, since lead is not absorbed into the organs and blood (where accumulations can be fatal) when it is simply lodged in muscle or other non-organ tissue.  The lead ammunition bugaboo is based on waterfowl hyperbole and over estimation where ducks and geese, et al have CROPS full of GRIT (pebbles, shot and other small round and hard items they must constantly replenish) that they use to grind their hard plant food like seeds for digestion.  Lead shot (less than claimed) is often ground up and passes through the digestive system with the seeds and if absorbed over a long period can prove fatal.  This “climate-change”-like anecdotal over-estimation successfully justified banning lead for any waterfowl hunting over two decades ago.

Then the same folks used it to justify banning lead fishing tackle because loons were dying from “lead poisoning”.  When I tried to explain to a couple of Minnesota fishermen asking for others to turn in all their lead tackle a few years ago that the miniscule number of loons documented to have toxic lead levels ALSO had digestive systems plugged with fishing TACKLE (hooks, leaders, line) and were in fact starving to death thanks to the plugged digestive system and NOT LEAD, they got irate and told me to get lost.  You see loons HAVE NO CROP AND THEREFORE NO LEAD GRIT because they are fish eaters with digestive systems more like ours than their seed-eating cousins.  When a loon finds a bait minnow on a broken line (with tackle attached) on a snag, it swallows the minnow and the attached tackle that eventually knots up in the digestive system and starves the bird to death as its digestive juices flow freely and absorb as much of the lead as possible.

So let us return to the meeting about lead ammunition on MN State Wildlife Areas and the ladies emotional appeal on behalf of eagles.  Eagles don’t have, nor need, crops.  Eagles don’t need nor gather grit.  Eagles eat fish and meat.  So, all the eagle and lead-pellet X-rays that brought tears to our eyes that winter evening were simple deceptions.  Eagles that die from or are maimed by lead (or any other shot or bullet for that matter) either die from the wound; are disabled by the wound; or recover to stir all MN progressive’s patriotism as they soar above our waterways.

I remembered that little old lady recently and wondered where she is now as I read the following newspaper article titled, “Wind-turbine rule would allow for eagle deaths”.

Having been sensitized to the “fact” that no sacrifice (like ammunition cost and effectiveness or traditional family-heirloom weapon use) is too much to ask to “save” one, much less multiple eagles, from death or wounding I was shocked by the title.  Seeing men and kids investigated, prosecuted, fined, jailed (and prohibited from future voting and gun ownership unlike current prisoners incarcerated for “non-violent” drug crimes being released to vote and bloat growing recidivism statistics) and otherwise marginalized for shooting, mounting or possessing a Bald or Golden Eagle – all at great government expense – I read the article that upset me far more evidently than all the little old ladies or urban professional ladies or the old guys and bureaucrats that hang around them.

Here are the relevant parts of the article with my comments italicized in parentheses.

Wind-turbine rule would allow for eagle deaths

The Obama administration on Wednesday (14 December 2016) finalized a rule that lets wind-energy companies operate high-speed turbines for up to 30 years — even if means killing or injuring thousands of federally protected bald and golden eagles.

(THOUSANDS??  30 YEARS??  Those wind “farms” have been killing millions of “Protected” birds every spring and fall for 30 years already with nary a scream from all these do-gooders.  Not only were federal bureaucrats paid handsomely to “Protect” them, the bureaucrats of USFWS, the State bureaucrats, the “conservation” organizations, the bird outfits, the radical environmentalists and even the little old Eagle Rescue lady were all AWOL as they lied about lead to discourage hunting and fishing and treated their fellow citizens and their cherished pursuits far worse than government treats terrorists or incarcerated drug smugglers, sellers and perverters of America’s youth.)

    Under the new rule, wind companies and other power providers will not face a penalty if they kill or injure up to 4,200 bald eagles, nearly four times the current limit. Deaths of the more rare golden eagles would be allowed without penalty so long as companies minimize losses by taking steps such as retrofitting power poles to reduce the risk of electrocution.

(How come ranchers weren’t offered a silly “out” by these “concerned” bureaucrats like putting out eagle food or working at an eagle “rescue” center when they killed A golden eagle killing a lamb or a calf or a dog?  Maybe they could attach an electrical shocker to their dog or a lamb or a calf or a kid and let a golden eagle swoop in and get shocked when it grabs them?  It doesn’t work with wolves but then we could “test” it for years until the ranchers are gone. Just below you will see that the government won’t discuss or release eagle deaths data; so how do we know 4,200 is “four times” the current limit?)

     The new rule will conserve eagles while also spurring development of a pollution-free energy source intended to ease global warming, a cornerstone of President Barack Obama’s energy plan, said Fish and Wildlife Service Director Dan Ashe. 

(Pollution-free”??  4200 dead Bald eagles and an untold number of golden eagles minced up and lying about is a certain level of accumulated tissue and genes that is hardly describable as “pollution-free”.  The next time some jerk or jerkette bullies you or your children into a “come to Gaia” moment to deny any doubts about global warming, remember this bit of national disgrace because this bureaucrat justifies a magnitude of eagle killing unknown since federal ”protection” of eagles became a federal duty as a good because it eases “global warming.  As a nod to public information, this bureaucrat “Director” was a radical political staff Director in the US House and lost his job when Newt and the Republicans took control of the House 2 years into the reign of Clinton.  He was quickly picked up by USFWS in a top job and given charge of the federal Pittman Robertson Excise Taxes on arms and ammunition intended for state wildlife agencies and their wildlife programs.  Over the next two years $45 to 60 Million went missing, and per a General Accounting Office Audit was used to insert wolves into the Upper Rockies and open an office in California, both of which the Congress had refused to fund or authorize.  This effete environmentalist spent the Bush years in a non-job post and was then made Director under Obama.  The money was never replaced, state governments went AWOL, and no one was charged after Two Congressional hearings just before a Presidential election.  Yes, such a person is no surprise in the middle of this debacle.)

    “No animal says America like the bald eagle,” Ashe said in a statement, calling recovery of the bald eagle “one of our greatest national conservation achievements.” The new rule attempts to build on that success, Ashe said, adding that the Fish and Wildlife Service is trying to balance energy development with eagle conservation. 

(If this isn’t straight out of George Orwell’s description of Newspeak, i.e. meaningless babble that cannot be challenged or understood, then I don’t know what is.)

   Wind power has increased significantly since Obama took office, and wind turbines as tall as 30-story buildings are rising across the country. The wind towers have spinning rotors as wide as a passenger jet’s wingspan, and blades reach speeds of up to 170 mph at the tips, creating tornado-like vortexes.

The birds are not endangered species but are protected under the Bald and Golden Eagle Protection Act and the Migratory Bird Treaty Act. The laws prohibit killing, selling or otherwise harming eagles, their nests or eggs without a permit. 

(“30-story buildings”; “passenger jet’s wingspan”; “170 mph blades”: all built in enormous acreages EXACTLY where birds migrate and soar because that is where the best and most persistent winds have occurred for centuries.  Who knew such a situation was or even could be harming birds?  No wonder NO media or environmentalists or professors said anything.  Luckily we have the likes of the USFWS enforcing these bird protection laws and state DNR’s to do thing like manipulate “Rescue” ladies to regale us with why we should stop using economical and efficient ammunition for hunting because we might kill an eagle unknowingly. Al Capone had nothing on these guys.)

    It’s unclear what toll wind energy companies are having on eagle populations, although Ashe said as many 500 golden eagles a year are killed by collisions with wind towers, power lines, buildings, cars and trucks. Thousands more are killed by gunshots and poisonings.
Reporting of eagle mortality is voluntary, and the Interior Department refuses to release the information. 

(Raise your hand if you are surprised that the Administration that gave us the Hillary/ATF/Gun Smuggling/UN Small Arms Treaty Attempt/ Fast & Furious scandal; the Lois Lerner/IRS record destruction scandal; Private computer servers in basements; and just recently refused to explain computer hacking by Russia to Congress and magically disagreement between 17 government intelligence agencies disappeared while the President says he knows all about in a press conference as he scoots out to a 17-day vacation in Hawaii – also gives us:

“It’s unclear what toll wind energy companies are having on eagle populations.”

Ashe said as many 500 golden eagles a year are killed by collisions with wind towers, power lines, buildings, cars and trucks. Thousands more are killed by gunshots and poisonings”.  This latter is a lie.  If there was anything near this USFWS would have been screaming to Congress for more employees and budget and the “Establishment” would have granted it immediately for fear of being called “anti- America’s symbol”.

Reporting of eagle mortality is voluntary, and the Interior Department refuses to release the information. These guys must have taken public information classes in Moscow.  They should be fired for such illegal public employee arrogance to cover up…??)

    The new rule is set to take effect in mid-January, days before Obama leaves office. President-elect Donald Trump could change the rule or scrap it, but the process would likely takes months or years.

(Wow, can you imagine what things would be like if President Obama hadn’t promised President-elect Trump an honest and friendly transition of power?)

    Ashe declined to be interviewed, but he said in a blog entry Wednesday the total number of eagles killed per year is likely to be in the hundreds, not thousands. 

(How does a “public” “servant” decline” to tell the public about public business that has NO security (other than the tushes of the said bureaucrats) implications?  This swamp not only needs to be “drained”; it needs to be tiled and planted for the benefit of those paying for it!)

    Michael Hutchins of the American Bird Conservancy said Wednesday that his group has “some serious concerns” that the new rule will not do not enough to sustain populations of threatened eagles. 

(The “conservation” organizations are full of these guys.  They are like draft dodgers telling little kids what they did “in the war”.  I include here all those urban “useful idiots” that harm their rural fellow citizens for their own selfish imaginings and even the sincere little old ladies that babble on and are never challenged like some minority spouting nonsense or a terrorist-looking man or women stranger that shows up in some public gathering wearing heavy clothing and a backpack.  All of them intend to force the rest of us to submit to th+++eir vision of a society they run and we either submit or lose our rights or worse.

Yesterday I received an email telling me I was accusing Obama and his Administration unjustly of doing bad things as they went out the door.  The writer inferred that I must be a racist to be so anti-Obama.  Well, make your own decision here but I, for one, am glad to be done with them.  And as I said in the title, “don’t let the door hit you in the &$$ on the way out!”

Jim Beers

17 December 2016

Share

Another “Mysterious” Clinton Associated Death: Deja Vu All Over Again

*Editor’s Note*For those with understanding, note that this article states that a person was caught, “attempting to steal and smuggle “33” children…”

“As we know, Hillary has ties to convicted sex offender and child sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein. In addition, Hillary was involved in the NGO run by Laura Silsby, the former director of the The New Life Children’s Refuge. She was caught attempting to steal and smuggle 33 children from Haiti, most of whom weren’t even orphans at the time:”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Computer Modeling To Predict Crime

*Editor’s Note*Evidently man doesn’t think himself intelligent enough to realize in areas where crime is rampant, crime will persist. Instead, police departments are beginning to further fall down on the job by relying on computer modeling in hopes of stopping a crime before it happens. What possibly could go wrong?

Anyone familiar with computer modeling knows that, not only is it unreliable, but it is inaccurate and established for a free ride toward fraud and corruption, where money is the reward. Two quick examples that should be quite visible to people are, climate modeling and wildlife management modeling. If we examine the predictions created through computer modeling for climate change, most of the United States would be threatened by shoreline flooding, drought, weather disasters, etc. Nothing has happened out of the ordinary but that doesn’t stop the useless relying on computer modeling to continue cash flows. The same can be said of wildlife management modeling. Without stepping a foot in the field, so-called “wildlife biologists” readily predict doom and gloom to the many species of concern, and yet none of the predictions hold any water. Again, this doesn’t stop the fraud associated with it – of course driven by money.

We see from the article linked to below, police think computer modeling will “predict” where the next act of crime will take place. Last time I checked, the crime occurs in places where the crime has always occurred. Somethings never change. Or is the “computer modeling” the scapegoat for 1.) failure to do your job, or 2.) an excuse for racial profiling?

Whatever the reasons, the implementation of computer modeling to predict crime is, not only a waste of tax dollars but just another system to perpetuate government fraud and corruption, while at the same time labeling them “heroes.”

“Predictive policing” represents a paradigm shift that is sweeping police departments across the country. Law enforcement agencies are increasingly trying to forecast where and when crime will occur, or who might be a perpetrator or a victim, using software that relies on algorithms, the same math Amazon uses to recommend books.<<<Read More>>>

Share

What We Can’t See: Reaping The Rewards of Propaganda’s Brainwashing

“There is no news cycle. There is no national debate. There’s no Ed Murrow, no Walter Cronkite, no figure of authority from whom the public can learn the facts with a reasonable degree of trust. We have had so many iterations of lies, cover-up, cover-up malfunction, new lies, new cover-up and new cover-up malfunction that the experts are in information overload. What is going on in the head of an ordinary voter with a passing interest in politics and ten or fifteen minutes a day to devote to news?”<<<Read More>>>

pissonus

Share

Is This Really Analyses From an FBI Person?

You’ll have to decide. Two items that jump out at me. One, the information repeated in this video from an “FBI Analyst” comes from postings on a chat forum called 4Chan. I know nothing of the website, but….

Second, the analyst spends a bit too much time stumping for Donald Trump. To him or her, the answer to everything lies in electing Donald Trump.

However, I do understand and have a considerable knowledge about the corruption of the Clinton Foundation and the power they wield in the world. After all, most people do as they are told when their lives are threaten. Many have died bucking the Clintons and their global power brokers.

Share

Hillary Might Drop Dead

Consider the possibilities!

It must first be understood that there is absolutely nothing connected with United States politics and Central Government, directly or indirectly, that can be trusted. If you do trust them, you are a fool. None of us has any idea what is really going on with Hillary Clinton, her health or otherwise, if anything at all. As a matter of fact, once you take the time to forensically examine every tiny aspect of the fraud, constantly perpetuated on the people by Government and the Ruling Establishment, the corruption is so extremely embedded into the system, we can’t even have a semblance of trust that any of the images we see of Hillary are actually her. For sure, nothing repeated by the media, including much of the so-called “Alternative Media,” which is nothing more than a reflection of the efforts of Mainstream Media, propagandizing and brainwashing, is believable or should be believed. You have to have knowledge of who actually runs all media and what their intentions are with it.

I first glimpsed a video yesterday that so cleanly and neatly depicts someone, supposedly Hillary Clinton, back to the camera, standing at the curb waiting a limousine. The video was said to be the work of one Zdenek Gazda, a self-proclaimed person who loves to take photographs. Here’s the 20-second video that I saw. I have not seen, nor do I care to see, any other videos. I don’t waste my time on such nonsense.

Immediately I had my doubts about the authenticity of this video, because: 1. It appears staged. 2. The video was obviously taken from a camera on a solid mount, i.e. tripod? Who has time to “grab a video” to set up a camera on a tripod and why aren’t there throngs of other people mobbing the scene? The picture doesn’t move. 3. At no time does the video show any part of the person’s face and front depicted as Hillary. 4. It’s just too conveniently clean. 5. The hair on this woman is not an exact match to the hair Hillary sported in other photos taken during the 9/11 event. Check out these photos. 6. The hair is too neat and not at least a bit disheveled of a person who had to leave the ceremony because she was “overheated” or, later as we were told by the Mainstream Media, she is suffering from pneumonia. 7. The person in this video appears too slender to be the real Hillary.

But what do I know and what does it really matter? What does matter are two basic issues, each of which can be quite complicated.

The first issue is whether or not Hillary Clinton is this ill. More than likely we have been lied to when we were told that on Friday, Clinton was diagnosed with pneumonia. Seriously? How many 68-year-old women, could or should be up on their feet and in the hot blazing sun for any length of time. But never mind that. If she is that sick, I think the American people need to know and she needs proper care.

The second issue is a real complex one that can spider-web in multiple directions, all of which would be designed to defraud and destroy the American people. If Hillary is not sick, then the Media, as I have described above, is perpetuating a myth, even to a point of staging coughing attacks, barking spasms, goofy faces, fits, and now fainting spells.

Perhaps all of this hoopla is for a reason.

Consider the mess she is in concerning just Benghazi, the Clinton Foundation and her email server. Even Hillary admits she used a private server but claims she did nothing wrong and that the FBI has cleared her of any wrongdoing.

While I fully understand that overwhelmingly nothing that Hillary has done or will do is going to change whether or not people vote for her. Those who will, would regardless of any Hillary event. It doesn’t matter if they did or did not vote for her or anyone else because people going to the polls do not determine the next president of the U.S. That has already been decided. The system is rigged and the Powers That Be, manipulate and control every aspect of the election, including the media, and the “Manchurianish” candidate gets the nod, as we witnessed Barack Obama get “elected” – wink-wink.

Perhaps the Powers have determined, after the fact, that Hillary is just too toxic. In other words, they don’t want her. And, what if they don’t want Trump either. What’s the best way to get rid of Hillary’s problems of toxicity and possible pending charges and imprisonment(?).

She drops dead or “They” kill her.

To establish herself as some sort of iconic martyrdom, why not have one of these fits in say the last debate planned between her and Donald Trump…or maybe sooner. The entire event is staged. Hillary collapses and “dies.” She is now worshiped even more by the brain dead masses, any notion of further investigations into the Clinton Foundation or her email or anything else that hasn’t been brought out yet – I’m thinking those promised releases from Snowden – will be dropped and forgotten, except for the scoffed at and demonized “conspiracy theorists.”

After her “death” she is whisked away into a secluded-from-public remainder of her life.

Then what?

Because Hillary has “died,” Obama, with the 100% commitment of Congress, will suspend the election. Most likely, due to time constraints, Congress will have to ensure Obama remains in office for an undetermined amount of time.

From this point forward, I’ll let you consider the possibilities. I assure you they would NOT be good. They are not intended to be good.

Or….maybe she is receiving the Poisoned Cup?

Whacked? Perhaps, but the stage is all set.

goddard

Share

Donald Trump: The “33” Thousand Emails

33A day or two ago, I happened upon part of an interview a news reporter was conducting with Donald Trump. The topic came around to the supposed “release” by Wikileaks of emails “hacked” by “somebody” containing information from the Democratic National Committee that supposedly showed that the nominating process of the Democrat Party was a rigged event.

Why is this a surprise to anybody? Don’t you suppose the Republican nominating process is also rigged? And why not? Both entities are private entities, in which some people choose to think they somehow must adhere to “election laws” of which they don’t know what they are and who they are intended for, if, in fact, they exist.

But that’s not the point of this article. When it was announced that some “hacked” emails had been released, many news outlets reported “nearly” or “as many as” 20,000 emails had been hacked and released. After a time, that number seemed to magically grow to “nearly 30,000” as the Clinton and news media spin machines began telling everyone the Russians did it. If you persist in focusing on “the Russians did it,” you might miss out on who did…and who really cares?

Why didn’t they blame Donald Trump? Isn’t that the likely suspect in the game of fraud of deception? But not this time. Name any other time when, if something like this happened during a campaign, one side would be blaming the other. That’s how the game is played and people, calling themselves voters, think it’s real.

But, back to this interview. When the topic came around to the hacked emails, the reporter wanted to know if Donald Trump was serious when he sarcastically called on the Russians to help Hillary find her missing emails. Evidently one reporter, too stupid to know how to play the game given to him by his leaders, accused Trump of an array of crimes for conspiring with the enemy because of his statement.

In Trump’s response to the accusations, he said he wasn’t serious about asking Russia for help to bring down another corrupt American politician. However, during his response, Trump said, that there were 33,000 emails that got hacked. Why all of a sudden are there 33,000 emails and not around 20,000 or nearly 30,000? He didn’t even say “around 33,000.” He point blank said, “33,000.” Could it be that Donald Trump was announcing to the world who, ultimately, is responsible for the supposed hacking of these emails?

We know from past events, when someone or the media breaks news, they will often initially report that “33 lives have been lost,” or that “it is believed that 33 victims are being held hostage,” etc. 33 is a significant number. Was Donald Trump announcing who is responsible for the hacks? Doesn’t this mean he is also part of the hack? Does it also mean that Hillary was part of the hack? Does all of this mean there really wasn’t a hack?

BUT DON’T GO LOOK! IT’S A SECRET!

Share

Fed Investigates Self, Nothing New in Mexican Wolf Lie

It’s a continuing amazement that the Fed’s investigate themselves and come to conclusions that absolutely do not matter when all the damage has been done and any rulings are worthless and meaningless. I suppose now some will do the happy dance and declare a victory.

“The investigation by the Department of Interior Office of the Inspector General, expected to be made public today, substantiates many of the allegations made by Catron County in a 2013 complaint – namely that the service protected “genetically valuable” wolves in the wild, even after they preyed on cattle, did not tell residents when wolves were near and did not fully compensate ranchers for cattle killed by wolves.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Reform is an Answer?

Below is how Richard Fernandez ends his piece this week that describes the condition that exists in which Americans are living. It continues to amaze me that some brilliant people, real or controlled opposition, can precisely point out the “problems” and the “chaos” that exist and the compilation of those events that is the man-created society prepared for us, and yet offers “real reform” as the cure. I think he is better than this.

Reform, real or otherwise, has no meaning! Reform is value laden. Reform means a person or group of persons don’t like what they have and so they want to change it – reform it; real reform carries a bit more urgency?

Most of what is given to us by men is fake, but yet we want to believe in something. We look for answers somewhere but seldom in the right place. It is our habit, or at least for some, to seek out other men for something good that is said or written. It is all too often empty of meaning. A writer can articulate the obvious but to offer “real reform” comes up a bit short. I would like to read his proposal for “real reform” to better understand where he comes from and where he thinks we are really going.

Real reform will not come from men. It never has and never will. Perhaps the first step is to understand that these events that stir emotions in people appear as a symptom of a misdirected society, but in reality they are created and directed by the very evil that we are programmed to turn to for the answer. Government, nay, man does not have that answer, but we can’t help ourselves. Never can one turn to the creator of evil to find truth.

Government, and that term is used with a broad brush effect, creates the chaos (Orlando, Dallas, etc. it’s all fake), they embellish their creation, causing people to display irrational emotions, and with the irrationality the wrong solutions are offered. Real reform is not a real solution. It too is fake.

Men’s answers are not the cure.

“The door to Hell can’t be shut by speeches. It can’t be resolved by the epideictic presidency of Barack Obama. It has to be met by real reform. Once black grievance gets going, what answer do we give to the cry, “Why not me? Why not me?” The basic problem is that the current system is economically and politically unsustainable. It’s been writing checks for years that it can’t cash.  That is the message of the crisis in Europe. That is the message of the crisis in America. That is the message of Dallas.”

Share

Ha, Ha, Ha, Ha Jokes on You!

Filthy

Share