December 7, 2022

Diversity Fraud

Today I learned that the University of Wisconsin – Stout has removed two paintings from a central area on the campus stating that, “…students just couldn’t take the trauma of seeing a bygone era.” Also part of the group of idiots responsible for the obvious censorship, resulting in the destruction of history – evidently we only learn history that makes us “feel” good – is the Diversity Leadership Team. The Diversity Leadership Team promoted their support for removing the paintings by suggesting that such paintings perpetuated racial stereotyping.

You can read about some of this at Pajamas Media.

However, last evening I turned on the television. I decided to check out what was going on in Brazil where sports are being played. (Note: Out of fear of violating trademarked names and hashtags, I hope I have given enough information so that you know what I’m talking about.)

Men’s basketball was being played between the United States and Venezuela. I generally do not watch the game, for various reasons, and in particular refuse to watch any basketball involving professional performers from the National Basketball Association.

The game itself did not interest me. What did interest me was, in the context of the above story about diversity and racial stereotyping, that the USA men’s basketball team, comprised of 12 players, were all black. Not one white guy on the team as a player.

Don’t get me wrong. I’m not a crybaby that concerns myself with racial stereotyping and diversity. But, those crybabies, as we have seen above, and the millions of other crybabies who scream racial discrimination, racial diversity and stereotyping, isn’t it the epitome of all those things that the United States of America would select an all black basketball team to represent the country in the sporting games in Brazil?

Personally, for whatever it’s worth, for purposes of such events, the best team should represent the country and it matters not what color they are. What is absolutely ridiculous is that for those wanting to censor art and history because it might make somebody not feel very good, or out of fear of suggesting racial stereotyping, somebody sure did a piss poor job in fielding a “diverse” men’s basketball team. I’m sure there must be those that don’t “feel” very good that whites are excluded from the team.

Where’s the diversity in the diversity? Would there be the same acceptance of an all white team as there has been for this all black team?

I wonder.


“Bitter Clingers” A Reality?

Pat Buchanan writes of “The Great White Hope” as an explanation of why angry white men are following Donald Trump: “When our cultural and political elites celebrate “diversity” and clamor for more, what are they demanding, if not fewer white males in the work force and in the freshman classes at Annapolis and Harvard?

What is the moral argument for an affirmative action that justifies unending race discrimination against a declining white working class, who have become the expendables of our multicultural regime?

“Angry white male” is now an acceptable slur in culture and politics.”


These are “The Bitter People”

“It’s not surprising,” Barack Obama volunteered to his San Francisco high-donors, that such folks, “get bitter, they cling to guns or religion or antipathy to people who aren’t like them…”

Did Barack Obama believe his racist statement at the time? Or, is this what he hoped to accomplish in the 8 years the Council on Foreign Relations gave him to carry out orders and etch his legacy into future fake history books?


Old White Guys Suck. Don’t Fit “Asshole” Follower Paradigm

As disgusting as the title is, and as equally disturbing as the article found in the Washington Times, written by Wesley Pruden about the changing perspective of today’s lifestyle is, none of it can be appreciated unless you can laugh and that you have a sense of what is right and what is wrong. (I know that makes my audience small.) Forget the Constitution. That no longer has any bearing on life in these United States…well, unless it becomes a convenience to fill in voids in one’s narrative. It works quite well on anyone at sea over having understanding of what’s in the Constitution and who it was written for.

First for the humor. Pruden writes about Susan Rice addressing a mostly Hispanic audience in Miami Florida about there being too many Old White Men: “Miss Rice apparently learned this at the White House, where President Obama tolerates no Republicans, conservatives or other dissidents to upset the groupthink prevailing. “In the halls of power,” she said, “in the faces of our national security leaders, America is still not fully reflected.” This may well be true. When you’re following a leader who is “leading from behind,” all you can see is the seat of the pants of whoever marches ahead of you, and for most of us that’s not very inspiring.”

Not intending to insult anyone’s intelligence (cough, cough) but I’m not sure that “some” can appreciate what Pruden is saying here. So, I’ll interpret for you. Obama is said to lead from behind. That would mean that Obama and all his administration are always looking at the “seat of the pants”  assholes walking in front of them. Rice says this isn’t a reflection of who we are. She means not all of us are brain dead assholes…yet. Now do you get it?

With the brainwashing nearly complete, Pruden points out that nobody is any longer interested in anything “old white guys” had, did, or will do. In other words, in this day and age, we plain suck. It no longer matters of results. It no longer matters of any sense of morality. It no longer matters that all people should be left alone, protected and respected of their rights gifted them by their Creator. Progressiveness means kill those who no longer agree. Old White Men are now the useless eaters. We can no longer live lives full of prosperity and the pursuit of happiness.

Obama is a mindless puppet, and mindless people don’t want to see or hear about any of it. They just can’t, and don’t want to, put any pieces of the puzzle together. One who pulls his puppet strings, Susan Rice (but don’t go look at why, because you might learn something of importance), says that, “we should all know the dangers of ‘groupthink,’ where folks who are alike often think alike. By contrast, groups comprised of different kinds of folks tend to question one another’s assumptions, draw on divergent perspectives and experiences, and yield better outcomes.” (Note – Rice evidently never studied history, including that of the Bible, to understand the realities of forcing diversification upon people’s not led by and following God.) She doesn’t really believe what she said, but the way it’s worded she wants YOU to believe that. Sounds great doesn’t it? That’s because of the way we are programmed. No longer is anything in life about respecting the sovereignty of others, it’s about presenting a false ideology, made to sound exquisite (double speak), the result a disaster. Disasters cede power and control of the individual to the Ruling Establishment people like Susan Rice.

I have written often of the modus operandi of the Ruling Establishment (the Susan Rices of the world). Let me repeat for you: They (Ruling Establishment) create the problems first. They follow this up with embellishment. And lastly, they construct a “cure.”

In the case referenced above, Rice embellishes her “created crisis” (“Never let a good crisis go to waste.” Ever heard that before?) – “GroupThink.” Her idea is if we throw everything we can find in the “Old Man’s Soup” and blend it all together, we will “yield better outcomes.” The non thinking asshole follower loves the idea of “better outcomes,” but has no idea what one is. They have to be told. In the meantime Rice fully understands the “better outcome,” – it is intended for her and her posterity (Ruling Establishment).

Old White Men are useless and you should learn, through the Ruling Establishment’s propagandizing campaign that Old White Men are dangerous. We own guns and respect the rights of others! I guess we didn’t realize that being nice about it would be the cause of our demise.

Assholes, following assholes become the assholes others will follow. I guess that’s a better outcome?

Leading From “Behind”



Day 59 – No Executive Orders


Day 59, just shy of two months, the American people have waited to see the details of what the majority of people thought were President Barack Obama’s signed 23 executive orders on gun control. The President presented his puppet press with 23 ideas that related to guns and gun rights and promised he would draft 23 orders to implement these Second Amendment violations. He even created a dog and pony show, perhaps better described as an act of prestidigitation, complete with smoke and mirrors.

There are no executive orders on gun control posted on the White House website as promised.

Timothy P. Carney had an article a couple of days ago about how liberals, specifically those who present themselves as being opposed to gun ownership, aren’t all that interested in attacking the real problems surrounding violence, gun violence and mass murders in this country. Instead their attacks are focused on destroying a culture, or a lifestyle, that they dislike or don’t agree with. Should this really come as a shock to any of us?

Carney writes:

Gun control efforts are largely a culture-war offensive by liberals who dislike the parts of America that own guns and love guns. This meddling motivation shines through in the rhetoric of gun control advocates and in the laws they push.

For many gun owners, the firearm is not merely a tool for the practical purpose of self-defense. Nor is it simply recreational equipment, like a golf club. It’s a cultural signifier, and a totem of a worldview.

How true, but lets not lose sight of the fact that this same method of attack happens at some level regardless of political ideals. We can’t help it. We have been trained to think this way. Involuntary labels and mind manipulation have us programmed to think that we must opposed an idea simply because it comes from “the enemy” or the other side of politics and culture.

I would suppose that many of us give lip service to the idea that proposed bills that aim to limit Second Amendment rights aren’t about guns and gun violence. What we have difficulty in doing is expressing then what it really is about.

This idea of attacking a lifestyle or a culture is nothing new and certainly is not confined to Second Amendment issues. Choose your poison and it’s there. Somehow in our society we have reached a point where we have foolishly patted ourselves on the back as being this better-than-thou people of diversity and tolerance, and yet little of it exists. I recall learning about this perhaps as far back as high school as it dealt with Americans’ “Puritanical” self perspective. Somehow it was once believed to be of value to live a life of moral decency and yet as we spoke of our decency, with blinders fitting snugly, the realities of our lifestyle told a different tale.

It is of course my belief that this need that people have in attacking a culture we don’t like is purposely created and begins pretty much from the day we are born. With each successive generation the task of programming the people becomes easier as we are now witnesses of.


Yesterday I shared of how Fascist Feinstein got her assault weapons bill passed through the Senate Committee. Below is a video of the exchange between Sen. Ted Cruz of Texas and Fascist Feinstein. Note the politics as usual. Sen. Cruz asks a question in which Fascist Feinstein never answers, instead gives a pity party speech about how wonderful and smart she is. The discussion then turns toward books instead of guns and ends with a confessional of how Heller v. District of Columbia gives Fascist Feinstein the right to decide that Americans don’t NEED over 2,700 guns she wants to ban.