September 25, 2017

But Isn’t It ALL FAKE?

The Patriot Post has an article about how “nefarious,” “alarming” and “minus perspective” media reports have become concerning global warming. While the author’s information may or may not be true, does it really matter? Disputing what and how others report on “Climate Change” is a bit like the pot calling the kettle black.

The article states: “Like any policy discussion, the field of science can be easily distorted and misconstrued when it lacks proper perspective and insight.”

Great! But, so what? If the New York Times reports that, “nothing can be attributed to mere natural causes any more. It all has to be because of global warming,” and this is followed by a report that science can and is distorted along with a lack of honest perspective with no truth presented for readers, it is then “Fake News.” In the context of what is being written, one has to ask then if rebutting on “Fake News” doesn’t by default become “Fake News?”

Who knows what the proper terminology should be for what is being written. It’s all mostly a lie and worthless (to me) propaganda. I understand that media outlets have to make money and so they publish what they think will make them money. Not everyone can see it as such. Of course the Media hide behind their responsibility as journalists, blah, blah, blah. However, the short and long of it all is that it’s but mere entertainment and that’s why we read what we read. Who would actually read facts and figures?

The reader isn’t interested in discovering truth because to do so requires work. One has to dig beyond the emotional clap-trap. Nobody does that nor do they care. And, the media knows that and that’s why they entertain their readers with Fake News because THAT’S WHAT THEY WANT TO READ AND HEAR!

Consequently what we are left with is Fake News, faking out the fakers who fake news.

Share

Ford’s Funding of “Fake News” Through Ad Revenue Raises Questions

*Editor’s Question* – When Obama was in the White House and Fox News spent every waking minute being “hostile” toward the man, was Fox News also “Fake News?” Isn’t this just getting a bit carried away?

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Shareholder Activists Want to Ask Ford Motor Company Executives About Potential Backlash for Advertising on News Programs Hostile to Trump Administration

Will Automaker Use Virtual Format to Avoid Answering Tough Investor Inquiries?

Washington, DC – On Thursday, the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project  (FEP) – the nation’s leading proponent of free-market investor activism – will seek to ask Ford Motor Company executives if they believe there is a reputational risk and potential consumer backlash from advertising on television news programs hostile to the Trump Administration.  FEP representatives are hoping for the opportunity to pose this tough question during Ford’s first online shareholder meeting – a departure from traditional in-person meetings.

“Ford executives will be tested to see if they are willing to tackle hard questions at a virtual shareholder meeting where they control access,” said National Center Vice President David W. Almasi.  “When liberal politicians wanted to avoid angry constituents during the Tea Party movement, they held virtual meetings to avoid uncomfortable interaction.  We are hoping Ford executives will not employ the same strategy.  Annual meetings are the one time a year when shareholders can question corporate leadership.  To restrict that opportunity would be a disservice to the investment community.”

The Ford shareholder meeting will be held on May 11 at 8:30AM eastern in an audio-only format accessible through the Ford website.

During the meeting’s question and answer session, FEP hopes to ask if Ford executives think that advertising on news programs hostile to the Trump Administration could harm the Ford brand by exposing it to “reputational risk” now that “fake news” and leaked emails showing collusion between liberal political operatives and members of the media have caused public trust in the media to plunge.

“We filed a shareholder resolution asking Ford to detail the risk to its reputation of doing business with media outlets that were exposed by WikiLeaks as working closely with the political class to promote specific political and policy agendas.  Rather than being transparent about such risks, the company petitioned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission seeking approval to exclude our proposal, arguing that this was an issue in which shareholders shouldn’t have a say.  The SEC ultimately agreed with Ford, but we are still seeking answers,” said National Center General Counsel and FEP Director Justin Danhof, Esq., who is set to represent FEP at the meeting.  “Now, many of those same news outlets that we expressed concern about in our proposal are seemingly at war with the White House.  President Trump has called much of the mainstream media an enemy of the American people and has accused specific media outlets of peddling fake news.  The risks to Ford’s reputation of continuing to advertise with such outlets appear to be increasing, not diminishing.”

This is the third time FEP will participate in a Ford shareholder meeting.  In 2011, FEP asked Ford to reassess its membership in the U.S. Climate Action Partnership (USCAP) – a fringe political group pushing regulations that FEP noted might negatively impact Ford and its consumers. Ford left USCAP  in 2012.  In 2014, a FEP representative asked the automaker to educate the public about how government regulations increase the cost of producing a vehicle and to consider listing regulatory impact on sales stickers of new Ford cars and trucks.

 Launched in 2007, the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project is the nation’s preeminent free-market activist group – focusing on shareholder activism and the confluence of big government and big business.  Since 2014, National Center representatives have participated in nearly 100 shareholder meetings to advance free-market ideals in the areas of health care, energy, taxes, subsidies, regulations, religious freedom, food policies, media bias, gun rights, workers’ rights and many other important public policy issues.  This is the fourteenth shareholder meeting the FEP has attended in 2017.

The National Centers Free Enterprise Project activism has yielded a tremendous return on investment:

  • FEPs highly-publicized questioning of support for the Clinton Foundation by Boeing and General Electric helped trigger an FBI investigation of the Clinton Foundations activities that dominated the 2016 presidential campaign.  
  • FEP inquiries prompted Facebook to address political bias against conservatives in social media.
  •  Company executives acknowledged media bias at ABC News (Disney), the Washington Post and CNN (Time Warner) in response to FEPs challenges, which helped to bring about more objective reporting and more balanced political representation.
  • FEPs Employee Conscience Protection Project strengthened protections for the political beliefs and activities of over five million workers at 13 major U.S. corporations.
So far in 2017, the FEP has been featured in media outlets including the New York Times, Washington Post, USA Today, Variety, Associated Press, Bloomberg, Breitbart, WorldNetDaily, Drudge Report, Business Insider, CNET, National Public Radio, American Family Radio and SiriusXM. In 2016, the FEP was also featured in the Washington Times, the Fox News Channel’s “Cavuto,” the Financial Times, Crain’s Chicago Business, the Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Times, Fortune, Newsmax, the Daily Caller, Lifezette, the Seattle Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Chicago Tribuneamong many others.  The Free Enterprise Project was also featured in Wall Street Journal writer Kimberley Strassels 2016 book The Intimidation Game: How the Left is Silencing Free Speech (Hachette Book Group).

 

 The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank.  Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations.  It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 60,000 active recent contributors.  Sign up for email updates here.  Follow us on Twitter at @NationalCenter for general announcements.  To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.

Share

Disney’s Response to Fake News: Deny, Deny, Deny

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

National Center for Public Policy Research Takes President Trump’s Fight Against “Enemy of the People” Media to Disney Shareholder Meeting

Disney CEO Robert Iger Claims ABC News “Extremely Fair” – Despite Wikileaks Exposure of Documents Showing Hillary Clinton Campaign Coordinated Coverage with ABC’s George Stephanopoulos

Claims ESPN On-Air Staff’s Criticism of ESPN Bias is “Completely Exaggerated”

Iger Claims ABC News Skepticism of Trump is Similar to its Skepticism of Obama

In Other Meeting News, National Center Ushers Defeat of Liberal Shareholder Proposal Designed to Stop Disney from Working with Pro-Business Organizations Such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce

Denver, CO/Washington, D.C. – Taken to task once again by the conservative shareholder activist organization National Center for Public Policy Research about political bias, Walt Disney CEO Bob Iger dug in his heels so much at his company’s annual shareholder meeting today he claimed ABC News’ treatment of Presidents Donald Trump and Barack Obama is similar.

“I don’t think that Mr. Iger has turned on ABC News or ESPN in a very long time,” said National Center General Counsel and Free Enterprise Project Director Justin Danhof, Esq., who attended today’s meeting and questioned Iger.  “If he bothered to watch his networks, he would realize what President Donald Trump and millions of Americans do – that Disney’s media platforms are purveyors of fake news.”

“When we presented Mr. Iger with very specific examples of bias and failures of basic journalistic ethics, he dismissed these concerns as being exaggerated.  Even when we asked him about a top ABC journalist colluding with a political campaign to smear a perceived political opponent, he claimed he was proud of ABC’s efforts and that the network operates in an extremely fair way,” added Danhof.

In his prepared remarks, Danhof stated:

WikiLeaks has provided plenty of evidence that you are not requiring your news organizations to be politically-neutral. After ABC News’ George Stephanopoulos interviewed Clinton Cash author Peter Schweizer, WikiLeaks exposed communications appearing to show operatives for Hillary Clinton’s presidential campaign working with Stephanopoulos to delegitimize Schweizer and his work.

WikiLeaks also exposed an email from a top liberal donor to Mrs. Clinton’s campaign chairman in which it was alleged you wanted “to be helpful” to the campaign.

Danhof also noted the Disney-owned ESPN is increasingly focusing on liberal social causes rather than sports.  Danhof said:
It is not just outsiders who have these concerns.  An ESPN host claims the network is obsessed with bashing conservatives.  He recently said, “I feel like there’s so many people that I work with that every show, every topic, every angle on it, is hoping to be… destroying the [political] right on every single thing that comes up… I hear it every single day.”  Agreeing, his cohost asked: “Can you imagine if I teased this show and said: ‘coming up, why all of you are wrong about Trump and why he’s awesome?’”  The host replied: “We wouldn’t make it through the commercial.”
Danhof’s entire question, as prepared for delivery, is available here.

Iger responded that he is “proud of the efforts of ABC News,” claiming that Disney-owned news organizations act in an “extremely fair way.”  He claimed comments about ESPN bias made by Danhof and ESPN’s own staff are “completely exaggerated.”  He justified negative news coverage of President Trump because “news can be an adversary.”

Danhof responded to Iger that coverage of Presidents Trump and Obama by ABC News and ESPN were not similarly adversarial.

The National Center’s Free Enterprise Project also brought up the issue of media bias at Disney shareholder meetings in 2009, 2013, 2014 and 2016.

In other meeting business, Danhof urged Disney investors to reject an anti-free speech proposal presented by Zevin Asset Management – a proposal that then was defeated.  The proposal took issue with Disney’s association, and even any potential association, with pro-business organizations such as the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Rebutting Zevin’s attacks on the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the National Restaurant Association in particular, Danhof stated:

Concerning Disney’s relationship with the National Restaurant Association, the proponent claims: “No doubt Disney’s membership dues to the association known (for their lobbying muscle) as ‘the other NRA’ go to lobbying against fair pay and working conditions.”  This is a baseless claim.  The National Restaurant Association works to expand employee freedoms in ways that positively impact millions of Americans and combats onerous state and federal regulations.  Concerning Disney’s relationship with the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, Zevin fully admits that it doesn’t even know “if Disney currently belongs to the Chamber” but still wants the company’s investors to reject the Chamber based on the Chamber’s opposition to unnecessary and costly Environmental Protection Agency plans to curb power plants.

Zevin’s guilt-by-association tactic harkens back to an era when folks were asked “are you now or have you ever been…”  That’s an issue Disney knows something about.

Danhof’s full statement against Zevin Asset Management’s proposal, as prepared for delivery, is available for download here.

The National Center issued a press release on March 7 advising Disney shareholders to reject Zevin Asset Management’s proposal.  The proposal, and Disney’s response to it, are available on pages 61-63 of the company’s proxy statement, which is available for download here.  In preliminary results announced at the meeting, the proposal was defeated after receiving less than a third of shareholders’ votes.

“Corporate America is under assault from a twisted web of coordinated, liberal activists that pose as good governance proponents,” said Danhof.  “From Zevin Asset Management, to As You Sow, to Ceres, to the SEIU, to the Center for Media & Democracy and many dozens more, liberal activist groups are seeking to use corporations as tools to advance far-left policies on issues such as health care and the environment.  But more than anything, this movement is about ending one thing that many liberals simply abhor – free speech.  Disney’s investors should be proud that they saw through Zevin’s false good government guise and rejected its anti-free speech agenda.”

“Today’s meeting was hijacked by anti-free speech leftists from beginning to end,” noted Danhof.  “Using the Zevin proposal as a launching point, activists representing numerous liberal organizations demanded that Mr. Iger quit his role on President Donald Trump’s Strategic and Policy Forum.  These activists proved our point that the Zevin proposal – and the left’s overall corporate activist mission – has nothing to do with good governance.  Rather, the left is in the business of creating enemy lists and dictating which politicians and organizations businesses can engage with.  As the left fails to win the hearts and minds of the American people, they are now simply trying to silence those with whom they disagree.  How sad.”

Launched in 2007, the National Center for Public Policy Research’s Free Enterprise Project is the nation’s preeminent free-market activist group, focusing on shareholder activism and the confluence of big government and big business.  Since 2014, National Center representatives have participated in nearly 100 shareholder meetings advancing free-market ideals in the areas of health care, energy, taxes, subsidies, regulations, religious freedom, food policies, media bias, gun rights, workers’ rights and many other important public policy issues.  Disney’s meeting will mark its third shareholder meeting so far in 2017.
In 2016, the Free Enterprise Project was featured in the Washington Post, the Washington Times, the Fox News Channel’s “Cavuto,” the Drudge Report, the Financial Times, Crain’s Chicago Business, the Hollywood Reporter, the Los Angeles Times, Fortune, Newsmax, the Daily Caller, Lifezette, the Seattle Times, the Quad City Times, the San Francisco Chronicle and the Chicago Tribune among many others.  The Free Enterprise Project was also featured in Wall Street Journal writer Kim Strassel’s 2016 book The Intimidation Game: How the Left is Silencing Free Speech (Hachette Book Group).
The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank.  Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations.  It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 96,000 active recent contributors.  Subscribe to The National Center here.  Follow us on Twitter at @NationalCenter for general announcements.  To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.
Share

Attention Readers: Don’t Trust Google Search?

Or perhaps we should not trust ANY search engine.

I’ve written sparingly on this topic but perhaps it is time to expand on it just a bit. Please understand one thing. If you, the reader, are not willing to devote the time to “vet” any and all “news” stories, don’t waste any more of your time to read the rest of this post. If you are, pay attention.

Many years ago, the Powers and Principalities that rule this world, (let’s just call them PnPs) had to devise a way to discredit anyone who questioned or challenged their authority. And so was born the vicious and extremely effective vituperation; Conspiracy Theorist. It has worked marvelously for the PnPs for many years, but perhaps that obloquy has lost its punch. Overuse may have caused some sort of desensitization of the masses, rendering it ineffective so as to not have the same amount of control over what people see and hear. The PnPs cannot stand for such loss of power.

During the 2016 presidential campaign, we were all introduced to “Fake News,” the new castigation, stamped on anyone who dared offer truth or any contradiction to what we are deemed to see and hear by the PnPs Media.

Yesterday, in the Open Thread, I posted a photograph of Mika Brzezinski, daughter of the Monster of Evil, Zbigniew Brzezinski, one of the prolific members of the PnPs. Mika B was quoted as saying that it was Media’s job to control what we, the people, are supposed to see and hear. This was not a slip of the tongue but something that she, and others like her, have, for so long carried out, it is routine – routine enough that few pay attention anymore or care that she said it. That is the weather vane of success.

The first time I heard “Fake News” I knew we were in for a change. Mostly gone now are the days of conspiracy theorists, replaced with “Fake News.”

To label something or someone as “Fake News” is easy to do. Like conspiracy theorist, it’s the lazy man’s way of passing off something they have no interest in discussing or in discovering truth about. In short, what ever doesn’t fit the personal narratives, that is those mind manipulated ideas beat into the brain since birth, are cast aside – now labeled Fake News.

But there’s a lot more to this than simply placing a label. Fake News accusations became rampant, slapped onto any and all sources of information, both in the so-called Mainstream Media and Social Media. This was done when somebody with a voice didn’t like something somebody else wrote or said. Even the newly elected president, Donald Trump, called CNN “Fake News.” Unfortunately, Trump failed to remind everyone that ALL news sources are fake – fake to the extent that details of a news event always become a fake Left vs. Right issue, or is saturated with untruths, crafted by the PnPs in order to influence public opinion. The average reader is incapable of recognizing what parts of a “news” report is truth and what parts are fake. The PnPs depend on that ignorance and work diligently to make sure the masses remain that way.

The entire world has been given a free license to be judge and jury over what is and what isn’t “Fake News.” However, it doesn’t matter. News has always been fake. I’m just surprised it took the PnPs this long to bring out the “Fake News” war weapon. What does matter, or should, to all of us is what happens now?

Recall the Hegelian Dialectic in which the PnPs create a problem (always a fake problem). In this case the “problem” was, Fake News. Once the monster is created, it must be embellished and perpetuated. This always instills fear – the more the better. During this process, the lies and trickery are for the purpose of carrying out desired outcomes. And thus, the dialectic ends with the PnPs offering a solution.

It may have been a new speed record in accomplishing an embellishment of the fake, PnP-crafted “problem” of Fake News, as it tore through the American Society like a pack of ravenous wolves. Within days, solutions to the fake, Fake News began to surface.

A person has to be extremely stupid and/or willfully blind to not realize, by now, that things like Google, Facebook, Twitter, the Internet, cellphones, music, movies, etc. etc. etc. are the PnPs’; directly or indirectly owned and/or controlled by them. Understand that the PnPs must control all of this in order that they can effectively control the minds of every person on the planet.

One of the first “solutions” that I became aware of came from Facebook, where it was announced that Facebook was going to make some changes in order that users would be assured that no “Fake News” would be allowed on the social media giant’s website that would confuse and mislead the readers. What could possibly go wrong?

Most people can’t see any of this because they never saw and still haven’t seen, that after 9/11 the scared masses were willing to give up some, more and all of their rights, believing the government’s embellishment that we are were, and are, all going to die if we don’t give government power to spy on us and watch everything we do and say. The Patriot Act was government’s “solution” to the “problem” they created in the first place. If you are struggling with this, ask yourself if the Patriot Act has been repealed and why not.

Now, across Cyberspace, we are being bombarded with claims that search engines, such as Google give “Fake Search Results.” This is an embellishment looking for a solution. So do we trust that Google search results are honest. If you have in the past and still are, you are a fool.

Do you use Wikipedia? Do you believe everything you read there? If you do you’re a fool. Oh, but wait! There are sites like Snopes or Truth or Fiction that can tell us “the truth.” Then there’s Fact Checker and any other creation that tells you whether something is fact or not. Do you trust them? If you do you’re a fool. (Note: To be clear, I use Wikipedia, Snopes and others, as a starting point. Just as I read both “sides” of the fake news, Fake News sites.)

So what is going to change? We know that search engines like Google give us search results they think we are looking for. What? You haven’t noticed that before? Here’s a way to find out. Call a friend – Sorry, text or email. Have them type in the exact same search term as you and then compare results.

Google could not get away with informing the public that they censor and control the Internet and all of your search results. However, with enough people now scared about whether they are getting “Fake News” they will be anxiously willing to let Google decide what “news” you should get…And you WILL like it.

Truth is a very dangerous substance to the PnPs, who never operate in Truth and always operate in deception. They, the PnPs, must control any opposition to their propaganda and media (all media not just the news).

We live in a Post-Normal world now. For those not knowledgeable about post-normal, it simply means that what once was the truth is now a lie and what once was a lie is now the truth. If you are living the lie, you cannot see truth, and that is what makes the job of the PnPs easier with each passing day.

Share

Coyotes In Maine Might Kill Several Tens of Thousands of Deer Per Year

This is how people are fed “news” these days. I thought I would jump on the band wagon. It doesn’t matter whether or not I can prove this statement. What matters, today anyway, is that I create an outrageous headline that people will run with. Most Internet users don’t read articles. They only consume headlines. It is proven that most users struggle to browse through 141 characters on Twitter.

The dishonest media, driven by the reality that they can’t survive without selling entertainment, figured this out quite awhile ago. That’s why Internet websites such as The Drudge Report do so well. If you haven’t been there before, it’s a one page website that contains mostly manufactured headlines, designed to grab your attention, not to entice you to read the article, but to run away with a headline that effects you and you can, in turn, effect, or perhaps infect, someone else.

Now that I know you haven’t read this article, you still don’t understand my headline.

Share

Fox and Whine’s Whines

I have recently come to rename Fox News Channel’s morning show, Fox and Friends, as Fox and Whine. That name should be self explanatory because all they ever do is whine about the left. However of late, their whining about the left carries with it a certain degree of Second Grade excitement due to the results of the recent presidential selection.

But I did have to laugh this morning, as I listened to the blonde bimbo, interviewing somebody, the topic of which is irrelevant. Often I have heard anchors on Fox and Whine refer to “The Mainstream Media” and presenting it in such a way that one would think they were excluding themselves from that labeling.

But this morning, there was no doubt left as the bimbo spoke the term “Mainstream Media” to the interviewee, following the comment with an explanation that “there are three members of the Mainstream Media.” She didn’t name them, but obviously intended to mean ABC, CBS and NBC.

This is akin to a member of the United States Congress being interviewed and shitting on “Congress” for how terrible they are and how the public has a very low opinion of them…somehow putting him or herself on the high ground and above reproach.

Isn’t it easy to call and label others while exempting yourself? It is more a reflection of how most people support more and tougher laws, including more restrictions on our rights, believing they are not supporting any of them to effect them in any way.

SMART!

There ought to be a law!!! Bwahahahahahahaha

Share

There is NO FAKE NEWS! Nothing to See Here. Move Along

Share

Yes, Yes, Yes! They DO Love It

From The People’s Cube:

 

 

Share

Countering Propaganda and Disinformation

*Editor’s Note* – In 1914, a place called Wellington House opened for secret business in London. It’s purpose? To “counter” the German propaganda machine by winning public opinion to support war at whatever cost necessary. The tactics and techniques of mass brainwashing already existed. What was needed was to pull together the right people, skilled at many things, including writing, to begin the “propaganda and disinformation” needed to sell the West’s people that war was a necessary evil.

Over 100 years later, while this country is swallowed up by the “Yuge!” distraction of Donald Trump, lame duck president, Barack Obama signed into law the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) of 2017. Few have knowledge and the majority don’t care, that the NDAA has become the clearing house where fascist rules get hidden from public view in order that the corrupt fascistic government can continue to undertake their fake anti-terror operations…and the American people evidently like the act and are more than willing to give up more freedom in exchange for fake security. In short they love their servitude.

What few people there are who are willing to discuss Obama’s signing of the act, ignorantly blame the president and his administration for signing it. The overwhelming ignorance of the people, combined with the controlled “Fake News” a.k.a. Wellington House (which shortly after the war became the Tavistock Institute of Human Relations) a.k.a Mainstream Media, look only to the person in the White House to blame. The NDAA of 2017 landed on the president’s desk for a signature. The ONLY way it could have gotten there is if Congress passed it – and they did but still, some want to blame the president. Congress even blames the president, when it was their work.

Oddly, once Fake Trump enters the White House, many of the Fake Conservatives, and the Fake News agencies, will turn this around to promote the triumph of the NDAA and especially the “Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act.” But nobody will notice, as never do brainwashed, non-thinking, sheep any longer know how to question – just to follow. Some think the act only applies to “foreign” countries. Perhaps that is the magical word but do you think that what goes on in foreign countries never comes back to the American people, presented as truth? Probably. Who do you think is responsible for the “foreign propaganda and disinformation?” Most think Fake News is those terrible people on the Internet (that need regulation and control) when the real Fake News is the product of the real Fake U.S. Government. But you don’t get that, nor do you want to. Truth is too often scary.

Following History, anyone brave enough to counter and question the Government’s official narrative, would have to ask if this passage in the NDAA, that clearly gives the Government power to do and say anything they want in order to “fight a war,” is a precursor to war – something other than the fake “War on Terror.” Wellington House was the precursor to World War I. Propaganda and disinformation has existed before and since that time, only now it is acceptable, among a brainwashed society, to be more open about it. Anyone wishing to expose the corrupt fascist government, which, by the way, includes Congress, the groundwork has been successfully laid to label, demonize, scoff, and ridicule any opposition to the official narrative. For many years it has been known as a “conspiracy theory” by a “conspiracy theorist.” That label may not be sufficient enough in today’s modern, techno-zombie society, and as such the new label has become Fake News. Follow and watch it closely. You are the reason for the signing of this law.

You are being screwed out of your liberties and you don’t know it – so badly so, you are willing and eager to give them up, in the name of public safety. There is a reason several major universities in the country have removed the requirement of history majors having to take any U.S. History classes. HMMMM!

BUT, DON’T GO LOOK!

“Recall that as we reported in early June, “a bill to implement the U.S.’ very own de facto Ministry of Truth had been quietly introduced in Congress. As with any legislation attempting to dodge the public spotlight the Countering Foreign Propaganda and Disinformation Act of 2016 marks a further curtailment of press freedom and another avenue to stultify avenues of accurate information. Introduced by Congressmen Adam Kinzinger and Ted Lieu, H.R. 5181 seeks a “whole-government approach without the bureaucratic restrictions” to counter “foreign disinformation and manipulation,” which they believe threaten the world’s “security and stability.””<<<Read More>>>

Share

The Fakers Who Fake Fake News (Propaganda) Trying to Fake Us All

*Editor’s Note* – Missing from this information is the fact that under the Obama Administration, when Congress, both republicans and democrats, passed the National Defense Authorization Act, they granted themselves permission to publish any and all propaganda without fear of any kind of punishment. It is only FAKE that the Senate, in the secrecy of the night, somehow is putting a stop to an act they are and have been doing for a very long time. I see all of this as simply a means to instill fear and further destroy our liberty of free speech. I have said for a very long time that as much of the perceived good we see in the Internet, there does exists those of us who will question and refute the official government narrative. This Government must find a way to stop that. This is one reason for the increase in propaganda about “Fake News.” Please open your eyes! Be aware of EVERYONE promoting and embellishing the “fear” of “Fake News.”

“The witch hunt for “fake news” and “Russian propaganda” has been kicked up a notch, after the House passed a bill quietly tucked inside the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2017, designed to crack down on free speech and independent media.”

“It is easy to see how this law, if passed by the Senate and signed by the president, could be used to target, threaten, or eliminate so-called ‘fake news’ websites, a list which has been used to arbitrarily define any website, or blog, that does not share the mainstream media’s proclivity to serve as the Public Relations arm of a given administration,” Global Research reported.”<<<Read More>>>(Note: please be forewarned that when I landed on the linked-to website, my computer was essentially hijacked due to excessive forced advertisement.)

 

Share