November 23, 2017

Mountain lions are savage beasts

In the late 1980’s it was determined by a relatively small group of financially and politically biased scientists and their lobbyists, that the population of Mountain Lions (aka: Cougar, Puma) in California, was dangerously low. So they launched a massive media campaign to convince Californians there was a genuine problem, giving rise to the 1990 California State legislation that provided a ‘protected’ status for mountain lions. However, there was no overwhelming body of scientific evidence supporting such a claim. And if there had been such credible evidence supported by a collective of unbiased and objective wildlife biologists, forming a majority opinion, mountain lions would have surely reached the benchmark for obtaining ‘endangered species’ status, and would be listed as such today. That was not the case.

Source: Mountain lions are savage beasts

Share

Moose Are Dying – Intelligent, Responsible Journalism is Extinct

An article sent to me by a reader, epitomizes the disgusting, irresponsible, ignorant, embellishing journalism is using to further brainwash already brainwashed people, who have had independent thought bred out of them.

The headline begins the travesty by declaring that moose are “dying in droves” because of global warming. Combine this with a final hilarious statement that:

A study earlier this year predicts that up to 97% of birds and mammals living in the vast region of northwest Alaska will experience major habitat affects from climate change.

and you have all the makings of a “C”-rated sci-fi movie – done in black and white. It is utter nonsense to lay claims of moose mortality on global warming when, in fact, there no longer exists ANY scientific evidence that global warming has occurred. What data that has been given the public, has all proven to be manipulated, worthless information that only helps those, like Al Gore, looking to line their pockets.

In addition, ALL studies done on global warming in the past that made “predictions” directed at scaring the hell out of pseudo-journalists like the one inking this nonsense, proved to be, not only inaccurate, but so far off all credibility was lost except to the useful idiots who still choose to believe the sky is falling.

The Doomsday writer wants to utilize a “study” that “predicts” the world is coming to an end because it sells copies? How insane. Computer modeling has proven to be a waste of time, not so much that the computers can’t make predictions but because the information being fed into them is design to produce the results needed to generate income to continue fake studies. Doesn’t anybody get this?

What’s most sad about this kind of irresponsible reporting is, it does nothing to assist and educate with facts in order that real science can be conducted to find out about the relationships with moose and all things within its environment that effects survivability of the animal. Yelling and screaming that global warming is creating bugs and viruses that are killing moose in “droves,” is akin to yelling fire in a movie theater when someone lights a match.

Actual, normal science strongly indicates that changes in climate have existed since the beginning of recorded history, are cyclical, and seriously affected by the sun. There is no real science that proves or even strongly suggests that burning of fossil fuels and other causes of carbon dioxide generation is sending the earth into some kind of irreversible death spiral. Get over it!

More than likely, what we are seeing with moose is a cyclical event, fueled in part by cycles of localized weather patterns, over-protection of moose that causes too high a population, which prompts disease, over-protection of predators that create precipitous drops in prey specie numbers, and a host of other factors.

It is just plain irresponsible for this reporter or anybody else to embellish such utter nonsense. Isn’t it time to get back to real science for the good of all?

Share

GASP! Fake Polar Bear Scientists Provide Fake Polar Bear Science for Fake ESA Listing

“As with the hockey stick graph and many other elements of the concocted story, honest scientists working in the finest tradition of skeptical scientific inquiry, started to unravel fuzzy numbers and lies. One such hero is polar bear scientist Dr. Susan Crockford, who publishes the website Polar Bear Science. In it she documents how a scientist responsible for an alarmist lowball estimate of polar bear population is backing away from numbers that she has been questioning:”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Wolves In Every Back Yard

Undeterred by reality and the growing hatred being shown nationwide in that people may think it nice for wolves to exist in wilderness areas, they don’t want them in their back yards, killing livestock, pets and endangering the lives of people with attacks and the spread of disease, Defenders of Wildlife (DOW) is pimping for more wolves. See the map below.

dowwolfplanmap

Source

*Note* – As additional proof that wolf pimps like DOW use fraudulent outcome-based “science” and/or are simply perverted wolf lovers who worship their disease ridden varmints, take note of the map above. This map has a shaded area in the northern two-thirds of the State of Maine. Real science would have determined facts on the ground in this area. There is nothing that lives in this region to feed wolves with. The existing coyote/wolf hybrid has done a pretty good job of destroying the deer herd, moose are seriously on the decline and there are too many bears killing fawns and calves. In short, it’s a predator pit.

The last time when actual wolves roamed the State of Maine was well over 100 years ago when caribou were plentiful. When the caribou left for Canada, the wolves followed and “officially” have never returned. Maine attempted to reintroduce caribou about 30 or 40 years ago and that was a huge failure.

In addition, it has been determined that Maine’s moose are now infected with hydatid cysts, the result of the spread of disease by the existing wild canines. More wolves? Give me a break!

I believe I read yesterday a reader’s comment about this stating that it would seem rational to make sure that an area has all the resources necessary for long term sustainability for predator, prey and suitable habitat BEFORE introducing wolves. It appears this is not the case as I can testify that there is no sustainable prey species in the area of Maine DOW wants their nasty dogs living in. There exists enough damage from the hybrid dogs that are there now. If DOW and others don’t want real science, what are they hiding?

If this is true for Maine, what about all the other fake regions they intend to pimp their wolves?

Share