June 21, 2018

When Guns Are Banned, Criminals Will Get and Make Homemade Weapons

And so will a lot of other people. As well they will keep many weapons is safe places where they can’t be easily found for confiscation.

Laws don’t stop “honest” people. Why do we insist they will stop criminals?

Link to: How ‘Improvised’ And ‘Craft-Built’ Weapons Kill All Gun Control Arguments

Share

The Dicks at Dick’s Say They Have Been “Humbled”

Ammoland says:

What a load. It’s time to humble them some more.

Share

The Right to Live is Supreme…Only If You Are a Liberal

The title above is part of what a California politician was quoted as saying while making his proposal to force everyone to turn in their “assault/military-style weapons” or face mandatory jail sentences.

According to NBC News, Eric Swalwell, a democratic said, “the right to live is supreme over any other.” No, seriously. That’s what the news article says.

Evidently, that “supreme” right is limited therefore it is not supreme. As with everything this country has brainwashed to believe and repeat, like my hate is better than your hate, a “supreme” right to life only applies to those who choose to believe if guns are banned they won’t die. For the rest of us who know better? Well, I guess we can just go to hell!

Share

Maine senators King and Collins back gun sale ban based on terror ‘watch lists’

*Editor’s Note* – Non thinking, unreasonable robots of our demented society may think this a great idea. While it would be ideological to think guns could somehow be kept out of the hands of any criminal, “terrorist” or not, due to the programming of minds in this no longer free nation, few have the capability of understanding about the so-called “terror watch list” or the ramifications of the administering of one.

We are kept in the dark, by design, about any watch list. We do not know, nor will we ever know, who is on it and why, nor what the parameters are that determine who makes a list. Therefore, like everything within a slave, police state, we are supposed to trust Central Government.

But don’t go look!

Maine’s two U.S. senators said Monday that they would support – to varying degrees – a federal law blocking individuals on terrorist “watch lists” from purchasing guns.

Source: Maine senators King and Collins back gun sale ban based on terror ‘watch lists’ – The Portland Press Herald / Maine Sunday Telegram

Share

House Democrats Introduce Bill to Ban Manufacture of ‘Assault Weapons’

With a total of 91 Democrats pushing the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2015,” it is interesting to note that the New York Times previously reported that the idea of a class of firearms called “assault weapons” is a piece of fiction the Democrats created in the 1990s. In an article titled, “The Assault Weapon Myth,” the NYT explained that Democrats created the phrase “assault weapons” in hopes of stigmatizing an entire category of guns—blaming those guns for rising crime—then banning them.

Source: House Democrats Introduce Bill to Ban Manufacture of ‘Assault Weapons’ – Breitbart

Share

It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them. | New Republic

*Editor’s Note* – This editor, website, administrator and all associated with TomRemington.com are not responsible for the utter ignorance on display in this opinion piece.

However, this is a classic example of how life in the United States is these days. Forget individual rights. Forget facts in this matter. The tactic is to begin a campaign of lies and propaganda that will eventually shift the conversation to one of possibility. This is not a new concept. It has proven itself on many issues. The basic principle here is that if you tell a lie long enough, the majority of brain dead fools will believe it.

I say this not to win some sort of ideological purity contest, but because banning guns urgently needs to become a rhetorical and conceptual possibility. The national conversation needs to shift from one extreme—an acceptance, ranging from complacent to enthusiastic, of an individual right to own guns—to another, which requires people who are not politicians to speak their minds. And this will only happen if the Americans who are quietly convinced that guns are terrible speak out.

Source: It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, All of Them. | New Republic

Share

Would Banning Guns Reduce Murder and Suicide?

A Review of International and Some Domestic Evidence. Study compiled by Don B. Kates and Gary Mauser. This study can be found in the Harvard Journal of Law and Public Policy.

Share

Colleges can’t ban guns, rules Florida court in major 2nd Amendment victory

“The Florida appeals court ruling that the University of North Florida was violating state law when it prohibited a woman from storing a gun in her vehicle while she attended class will spill over to cities and counties statewide, an attorney said Wednesday.

And it’s one of many nationwide where anti-gun activists are trying to do at the local level what they can’t do in the statehouse – restrict Second Amendment rights.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

New World Order of Microstamping and Silver Bullets

Bearing in mind that Kalifornia is the practice model for a new world order under a one world government, the state has finally authorized the implementation of mandatory “microstamping” of handguns. Microstamping is a method of using technology to create a unique “stamp” that is made when a firing pin meets the firing cap end of a cartridge. It’s also something very easy to get around. In other words, it’s a useless piece of legislation unless, of course, the aim here is to ban guns.

Under the guise of being able to “track” guns used in crimes, the action is actually about ending the manufacture and sale of handguns in California. But that’s okay! Just keep telling yourself that government is good for you and they are here to help and protect you.

In addition to the microstamping issue, the totalitarian regime in California is one vote away from implementing a state-wide ban on lead ammunition.

Share

Day 84 – No Executive Orders

FALSE WITNESS!

It is Day 84 and there is nothing posted on the White House website about Obama’s promised 23 executive orders. However we did get a preacher’s tongue-lashing of falsehoods and half-truths when Mr. Obama got all wee-weed up in Connecticut yesterday. While he was “ginned up” he accused anyone who opposes his tyrannical takeover of America, as getting all “ginned up” over his plans. A great example of the President intimating that the subjects should just shut up and follow him to hell…….one way!

nicegunfeinstein

Ban Those Magazines!

Gun rights destroyers say that if we were to ban high capacity magazines, perhaps fewer people would be killed in a mass shooting. A “high-capacity” magazine is one that holds many (over 10) rounds or bullets. A person carrying several loaded magazines, if the gun functions normally, can quickly and easily eject a spent magazine and inject a new, loaded magazine in a matter of 1-3 seconds, perhaps a second or two more for an inexperienced shooter.

According to what is written in an article by John Rosenberg at PJ Media, gun rights wreckers, as well as well-disguised, self-appointed “conservatives” ignorantly think that forcing a would-be mass assassin to have to reload a semi-automatic weapon a few more times would save lives.

Peggy Noonan of the Wall Street Journal, wrongly labeled a conservative, ignorantly says this about conjuring up an anti gun rights bill:

[I want] a quick, short, simple bill that would ban the use of big ugly monstrous high-capacity magazines [that would force shooters to] reload after seven or eight shots. It won’t hurt hunters, it won’t leave your house less safe, and in the cases of crazy people attacking children and mallgoers it will force them to reload, in which time someone might be able to knock them down or get the gun from their hands.

Hey, Peggy! Why not prevent this from even happening and allow a person to carry a firearm for protection?

Even at Sandy Hook, the media and others have perpetuated the myth that while Adam Lanza was trying to reload his gun, 11 children were able to escape. Lanza may have been trying to reload his gun but I can assure you it wasn’t because of time it would have taken to eject an empty clip and put in a loaded one. More than likely his weapon malfunctioned.

Ronsenberg does a good job of explaining why limits on magazines will accomplish nothing and the history exists to show so.

Oral Sex and Bloomberg’s Gun Banners

“Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.” Michael “the Tyrant” Bloomberg and his posse of anti-gun, anti-rights mayors set a very poor example of one wishing to clean up the streets and end gun violence. James Schiliro, mayor of Marcus Hook, Pennsylvania, supposedly was drunk and disorderly in his own home and held a 20-year-old male hostage (with a gun?) until he had oral sex with him. At some point during his rage, he fired his gun into the floor. Gun? Gun? GUN? This hypocritical fascist has a gun?

It seems that others in Bloomberg’s brigade of tyrants have a difficult time adhering to the laws of the land. Background checks needed Mr. Bloomberg?

Uh oh! Bloomberg’s Mayors Against Guns members “being over 45 times more likely to be convicted of crimes than Florida concealed firearm license holders.”

Share