December 8, 2022

Selling Out Hunting Heritage to Big Money Auction Tags

This information was released by the Idaho for Wildlife organization:

The Boone and Crockett club has decided to follow the SFW [Sportsmen for Fish and Wildlife] and MDF’s [Mule Deer Foundation] agenda of selling off our big game to the highest bidder and support auction tags.

B&C has decided to abandon the North American Model of Wildlife conservation‘s most important provision that was created to prevent North America into becoming another European wildlife model where only the rich or elite hunt.

The 4th sister in our current Wildlife Model states, “Every citizen has an opportunity, under the law, to hunt and fish in the United States and Canada.” “Regardless of your social status, race, creed, religion or gender, you have the right to legally hunt and fish on most public lands in North America.”

Auction tags are hunting heritage killers – just like wolves! The graph below illustrates what happened to the hunting opportunities in Utah when they decided to put their big game up for sale! Idaho Sportsmen, please fight against adding more big game auction tags (Governors Tags!)

Do you want your kids and grand-children to hunt?

Why are auction tags so deadly to our hunting heritage? Hunting is reduced considerably in these areas so big bucks and bulls can grow older and sport huge racks. This translates into the end of the traditional father/son, opening-morning, hunt for a raghorn bull or two point buck. This is a dangerous path and a very slippery slope that Idaho lawmakers need to closely consider before they endorse it.

How much [money], habitat success, and conservation projects can compensate for eliminating our hunting heritage?

What is the real price of auction tags? We can lose 50% of our youth hunters very quickly, but is it worth it?

How has all this conservation [money] helped Utah mule deer populations? Back in 1961, 132,000 deer were tagged in Utah. In 1985, they had 200,000 hunters who harvested 82,552 deer. This year, there were only 84,600 total permits issued, which covered archery, muzzleloader and general rifle hunts. Now Utah’s Mule deer harvest averages approximately 25,000, but the biggest tragedy is over 50% of Utahans have given up hunting!

How much good has all this auction tag [money] been to improve Utah’s declining Mule deer populations when Utah decided to put a $50.00 bounty on coyotes to improve Mule deer numbers? I support the coyote bounty but I wonder if raising all this [money] to justify auction tags is really making that much difference to benefit the mule deer?

Auction tag supporters tout the big [money] being raised for conservation, but is it truly worth the price of eliminating thousands of youth hunters and threatening the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation?

It’s amazing how the “checkbook” of a few wealthy proponents of auction tags can “Inspire” our big Sportsmen’s groups and state agencies to sell off our big game to the highest bidder!

Those that are pushing for more auction tags, need to realize they are jeopardizing the hunting opportunities of not only our next generation of hunters but their own children and grandchildren! Other states’ data can, and will, substantiate this!

For the rich guys who are always the primary architects behind this short-term, self-serving agenda, remember your grand-kids may not have your wealth and privilege.

Your decisions can and will reduce their hunting opportunities. Is this what you want?

Please consider the long-term consequences for our youth and their hunting heritage.



Hitler Discovers He Didn’t Draw Wyoming Hunt Tags



RMEF Waives All Revenue from National Convention Tags; Again Calls for Transparency from All Wildlife Groups

*Editor’s Note* Below is a press release from the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation (RMEF). Part of this release is about how RMEF is working to ensure that 100% of all money raised in the auctioning off of special elk tags goes back into wildlife programs. This editor is not a huge fan of auctioning game tags to generate revenue, regardless of the programs the money supports or the percentage of the amount of money goes directly to the programs earmarked. Although I commend the effort of the RMEF to take a troublesome program and make it as transparent and as effective as possible, there still exists problems and potential future problems with a continuation of these game tag auctions.

The press release below actually brings to the surface and demonstrates the problem. RMEF auctioned one elk tag in Arizona for $385,000. Obviously this is a handsome amount of money to get for one tag but how many hunters can afford that? Further down in the press release this statement is made: “While the funds raised from those special tags go directly back on the ground, the agency provides the remainder of its tags through a draw system and some limited over-the-counter opportunities for management of populations in specific units, thus giving the average hunter the opportunity to harvest an elk.”

One can choose to either focus on the fact that $385,000 was raised or that, even though efforts were made “giving the average hunter the opportunity”, “the average hunter” is being treated as a second class citizen in some respects.

It is always great to do what we can as hunters to promote hunting opportunity. In today’s business climate, high taxes and growing trends toward stopping all hunting, trapping and fishing activities by environmentalists, generating revenue for fish and game departments become even more difficult. On the surface, these auctions appear helpful and can add to the money pot but with each “special tag” auctioned off, no matter how you look at it, fewer “average hunters” are getting opportunities.

One might argue today that the benefits from the auctioned tags actually provide more opportunity for the “average hunter”, but how long will that last? Historically, don’t we see that when organizations are forced to generate income through fund raising, like auctions, then the expectation grows with each passing year? How long before all that will be left is game available to those with the financial ability to cough up $385,000 or more for one elk tag?

I’m not sure I have the answer to this problem and there may not be an answer. It may be the best of all evils. But if we can at least be made aware that this formula can potentially grow bigger to effectively rule out that “average hunter” or second class citizen’s opportunities to harvest game, perhaps the effort can be slowed down.

Short of finding better ways to cut fish and game budgets and recruiting more license-buying hunters, and the challenges that presents, RMEF’s efforts may become a growing event among fish and game departments in order to stay in business. It’s a dreadful thought.


MISSOULA, Mont.–In a continuing effort to ensure the future of wildlife resources and hunting opportunities, the Rocky Mountain Elk Foundation announced it will return 100 percent of the revenue it generates from the auction of state special big game permits through its national events and programs to the individual states.

“RMEF will not accept big game auction tags from any state for fundraising purposes unless all of the revenue derived from it benefits wildlife,” said David Allen, RMEF president and CEO. “This is a much needed investment in our wildlife resource and its management, habitat enhancement, and our hunting heritage. It also assists state agencies dealing with budgetary challenges. These tags were intended to benefit wildlife conservation and hunting access, not the organizations selling them.”

By way of example, RMEF recently auctioned off a special Arizona elk permit for $385,000 at its national convention. RMEF has historically sold the Arizona special elk permit with a 100 percent return to Arizona Game and Fish.

“This is a tremendous investment in Arizona’s wildlife. What everyone needs to understand is every single penny of that $385,000 goes to Arizona Game and Fish for projects to benefit the habitat for elk, mule deer and other wildlife. We want to expand this model to all the states we work with relative to their special tags sold at our national convention,” said Allen. “The RMEF convention historically generates $700,000 to $1 million each year in the auction sale of special tags/permits from state game and fish agencies.”

The special elk tag that RMEF auctioned off is one of three that the Arizona Game and Fish Department (AZGFD) provide to non-profit wildlife conservation organizations as a fundraising mechanism. While the funds raised from those special tags go directly back on the ground, the agency provides the remainder of its tags through a draw system and some limited over-the-counter opportunities for management of populations in specific units, thus giving the average hunter the opportunity to harvest an elk.

“We routinely receive about 80 applications each year for on-the-ground conservation projects that are funded from these proceeds,” said John W. Harris, chairman of the AZGFD Habitat Partnership Committee. “Funding decisions are determined through collaboration with the wildlife conservation organizations that raised the money and Arizona Game and Fish Department biologists. Those relationships extend to the project proponents that include land management agencies, livestock producers, county governments, and private landowners. The projects we fund are routinely cost-shared at least 2 to 1, and our ability to positively influence conservation and relationships among our conservation partners is expanded with every dollar raised. As is so often the case, hunter dollars benefit wildlife resources that all Americans can enjoy. This is yet another example of how Hunting is Conservation.”

“It’s of paramount importance to RMEF to not only be responsible for the money raised for wildlife, but to follow those funds from start to finish to make sure those who use them do so for their intended purpose,” said David Allen, RMEF president and CEO. “Sportsmen and women need to demand transparency and hold RMEF and all wildlife agencies and conservation organizations accountable, especially for the money and its use. These tags are a matter of public trust and we are proud to be part of that effort.”

Allen went to reissue a call to all other wildlife conservation groups to allow full and complete transparency of all their financial information including the publishing of their audited financials from each fiscal year. “We voluntarily submit to independent audits of our annual finances. Why should we not make this information available to our members and the public at-large? If we were a publicly traded business we would have to do this on a regular basis. Let’s do it as a matter of respect for, and accountability to, our members and the public.”

Public trust is one of seven cornerstones to the North American Model of Wildlife Conservation which highlights two basic principles – that our fish and wildlife belong to all Americans and that they need to be managed in a way that their populations will be sustained forever. Sportsmen and women provide the bulk of wildlife management and habitat funding to state agencies through the purchase of hunting and fishing licenses as well as self-imposed taxes implemented decades ago. They also make donations to and support conservation organizations like RMEF.

“When you look at the big picture, it’s amazing how the cost associated with just one tag can make such a positive, wide-ranging difference for our wildlife and for improving hunting opportunity,” added Allen.