August 22, 2019

Global Warming/Cooling: Lies, Ignorance, Politics or a Deliberate Plan to Screw the People?

It never ceases! What goes on outside is manipulated into some of the grandest of rip offs, con jobs and scams imaginable and yet, why are people so eager to run with the ball and spike it in the end zone when they aren’t even sure they have the right end of the field?

Before I continue, I want to thank a good friend and reader for taking the time to compile the majority of the information and links provided in this article. It for the efforts of people like him, I retain some semblance of hope for our future……or at least his.

We are but 22 days from an election where Americans will vote and certain people will be placed into political positions in order to rule over the people and take away their rights, even more. All of the hyped up lies and deception wouldn’t be complete without a good round of fear mongering as to how the environment is being destroyed by evil man and global warming or cooling, depending on who the crowd is you are trying to persuade, is still a good tactic to confuse, befuddle and scare the hell out of people with.

What is the climate of the earth doing and is what you hear and read about lying, pure ignorance, driven strictly by politics/agendas, or is it a deliberate plan laid out by very powerful people as just another means of destroying individual wealth and freedom in order to control the masses?

My answer is all of the above!

Here’s what the people get to listen to and read, that is if any care enough to pay attention:

* In Maine from the Kennebec Journal, an article on Sunday says that Maine’s winters are becoming milder. And it must be the god’s honest truth because:

The research was done by the Maine Sunday Telegram with help from the government’s National Climatic Data Center. The work was reviewed for accuracy and for comment by the National Weather Service in Gray and the state climatologist at the University of Maine in Orono.

Missing from all media accounts of “global warming” are accounts that describe what is happening GLOBALLY instead of regionally or in pockets. Some of you may recall nearly two years ago when I penned a short article about “pocket warming“. Instead of being transparent and presenting information of events within a “pocket” or region, it is much more effective to stroke a broad brush and call it global warming.

In Maine’s case here where the Kennebec Journal talks of a warming planet and winter’s are getting warmer, is this a case of a regional warming while globally average temperatures are falling? Or is it lying, ignorance, politics or part of “the plan”?

* Staying in Maine for a while longer, those who follow my rants know what I have written about the terrible management, and I use the term management loosely, of whitetail deer. But our masters at the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife (MDIFW) have all the excuses, one of them being climate. From the newly crafted “Maine’s Game Plan for Deer“:

Maine’s severe winters influence deer survival and deer numbers. To survive our harsh winter conditions, deer move to dense conifer forests, most of which occur on private land.

Severe winters and the claim that Maine had two back to back severe winters that destroyed the state’s northern, eastern and western deer herd, doesn’t exactly fit into the data that the “honest to gods” government and National Weather Service provided.

You may also recall that in rebuttal to MDIFW’s claims that the loss of deer was almost completely blamed on severe winters, I provided data and graphs that showed that deer populations in Maine have been collapsing for the past 10-12 years. Have we had that many severe winters? One might be led to conclude that if bad winters are killing deer and Maine winters are getting warming, the deer population would be growing.

* In addition, if Maine’s winters are really warming, one might easily get confused if they also read another short article in the very same Kennebec Journal, written on the very same day. Sunday River Ski Resort made snow for the first time this year and that:

Dana Bullen, president and general manager, said Sunday River is committed to making snow when the temperatures make it possible.

He said the resort has opened for limited skiing before Halloween for five years in a row.

I do understand that with the growing technology of snow making, snow can be made at warmer temperatures but seriously, aren’t you just a bit mixed up over whether it’s getting warmer, getting colder or perhaps things are mostly normal?

* Let’s leave the pocket warming….errr I mean pocket cooling…..let’s just leave Maine for a moment and span the globe. A media source from Great Britain tells us that global warming stopped 16 years ago…..and they have the god’s honest truth to prove it.

* If it isn’t good enough to learn that global warming has ceased, Pajamas Media writer, “Zombie” tells readers we are heading into an ice age.

Have these two accounts disregarded the pocket warming of Maine and perhaps other places or is this just the god’s honest truth? Lies? Ignorance? Politics? a Deliberate plan?

It could be all lies in order to fulfill a purpose. Perhaps that purpose is driven by money, corruption, general greed, fear tactics to gain control over people, win votes, or any number of things in which we know that our society today believes that any means justifies the end result.

We are all guilty of ignorance at every level. Undoubtedly the news account of Maine’s warming winters, supported by the god’s honest truth, is almost never questioned and when it is, people get scoffed at and ridiculed.

The ignorance nicely plays into the hands of the lying politicians or any other group – I have environmentalists in mind – wishing to dupe the public to promote their agendas and steal money and rights from them.

* But in reality, isn’t what we are witnessing really the product of a much larger plan; a plan much of which begins with our education factories?

To support my claim, consider an opinion piece written by a biology major at Bates College in Maine. Everything he writes is garbage and yet this is what he is brainwashed to believe. This is an end result of “Outcome Based Education“; a very nice way of saying brainwashed. Consider his opening lines:

My liberal arts education at Bates College has taught me a lot about the urgent issues facing our environment and our communal well-being: The Earth’s climate is warming; species are going extinct at an unprecedented rate; and known toxins pollute the environment.

Those problems are caused by a human society that values obscene profits and luxury over a healthy environment and stable climate.

In just over 60 words this person has pretty much written the manifesto of how those wishing to control you and me intend to do it. His thoughts are pure, unadulterated garbage and yet wildly accepted within our society. Why? Because along with this indoctrination we are taught not to question. One of the things for those of you too young to know about, and I guarantee you won’t be taught about, is that what made this country the leader of the world in knowledge, production, liberty, wealth, progress, etc. was to question everything. Never be satisfied with someone’s answer until you have proven it right or wrong.

We have purposely become robots, walking about with mobile devices, brain dead, believing only what our devices tell us and never questioning or taking the time to prove it.

Before you vote, or the next time someone tells you or you read or hear about how the globe is warming and the evils of carbon dioxide are to blame, bookmark this link to a Patriot Post by Joe Bastardi.

Bastardi provide four very interesting graphs that compare temperatures globally against the amount of carbon dioxide. Another graph compares CO2 with tornadoes; another with hurricanes and a fourth the 30-year temperature averages versus the amount of carbon dioxide.

And don’t forget, it’s the god’s honest truth!

Share

DNA Studies – Smaller Native Wolves Existed in Northern Rockies before Canadian Wolf Transplant

By George Dovel (Republished with Permission)

In the Jan-Mar 2008 Outdoorsman Bulletin No. 26, the lead articled titled, “What They Didn’t Tell You about Wolf Recovery,” described the ongoing deception by federal and state biologists in their scheme to fill rural areas in the lower 48 states with wolves.

The article referred to 20 years of Dept. of Interior Solicitors (lawyers) changing the number of N. American wolf subspecies covered in the Endangered Species Act from 24, finally to two and back to four – and then to any or all wolves called “gray wolves” or “Canis lupus”. Then it told how FWS reclassified ESA-listed wolves as members of two “Distinct Population Segments”, which it later changed to three until a federal judge denounced the obvious attempt to circumvent the ESA.

The ongoing debate between wildlife scientists who classify species, concerns whether subspecies of elk (red deer), North American bison, grey wolves, etc., exist. Bona fide expert taxonomists include Dr. Valerius Geist who points out that changes in location, habitat, size and appearance alone do not necessarily change the genetic make-up to qualify an animal as a separate sub-specie.

However the Northern Rocky Mountains wolf subspecies – C. l. Irremotus – was documented by physical comparisons of skulls, etc., from larger wolves in 1959:

Page 2 of the 146-page FWS Northern Rocky Mountain Wolf Recovery Plan dated August 3, 1987, contains the map showing the historical distribution of Canis lupus Irremotus in the lower 48 states, plus the 1987 distribution in black. It depicts immigration of Irremotus from southern British Columbia into Idaho and from B.C. or southern Alberta into the northwest corner of Montana.

It also shows the two 1987 Irremotus population areas in central Idaho, one of which included the three wolf pack territories mapped by Tim Kimmery between 1988 and 1991 (see Outdoorsman Bulletin No. 35).

Historical Impact on Wolf Subspecies

During the most recent (Pleistocene) ice age, water evaporating from the oceans became part of the glacial ice covering the land. Ocean levels dropped 300 feet or more and the Bering Strait between Siberia and Alaska dried up.
The exposed land bridge with little snow, later named Beringia, became a refuge for hardy Siberian animals and plants for several thousand years (see below).

Many scientists believe Beringia included a small human population from Siberia that was prevented from continuing into North America for 5,000 years by the North American ice sheets. Geologists report these continental ice sheets were 5,000-10,000 feet in depth and extended south in some places to the 40th Parallel below what is now the U.S.-Canadian border.

The artists’ three views of Beringia published by “Wikipedia” illustrate the changes that have occurred in the “Bering Land Bridge” during the last 18,000 years. But there is still disagreement among biologists about when, where and how several current mammal species first arrived on the North American Continent.

Subspecies Had Limited Opportunity to Crossbreed

Since 1995 a number of wildlife biologists have accepted the determination by Nowak that five subspecies of gray wolf (Canus lupus) inhabited North America during the early 20th Century. There is also agreement that Canis lupus occidentalis (the large gray wolf transplanted to Yellowstone and Central Idaho by FWS in 1995) had virtually no opportunity to influence the genetic make-up of coastal wolves in SE Alaska and Yukon and portions of five other Canadian Provinces where it existed.

For thousands of years the ice between interior Alaska, Yukon and British Columbia and the coastal area prevented the occidentalis wolves from mixing with the smaller wolves defined as C. lupis ligoni by Goldman in 1944. And the intensive efforts to kill all wolves in the early 1900s also left few of the large wolves alive in most areas where they might have mixed with the native wolves.

The map below in the study titled, “Legacy Lost: genetic variability and population size of extirpated U.S. gray wolves (Canis lupis),” published by Leonard et al in the 2005 Vol. 14 issue of Molecular Ecology, shows the five primary subspecies that existed in the early 1900s. The bold black line indicates the northern limit of gray wolf eradication that occurred in the 48 contiguous United States and Canada.

In 1995, C.l. nubilus, the primary subspecies common in the U.S. and Canada mainland included ligoni from the west coast of Canada, irremotus from the Northern Rocky Mountains and labradorius from Labrador. The “a” to “z” letters scattered on the map represent original locations of the various museum specimens whose DNA were recorded in the study.

A similar study titled, “Phylogeography of wolves (Canis lupus) in the Pacific Northwest”, by Weckworth et al (published in the 2010 (2) issue of the Journal of Mammology) used basically the same map, along with an expanded inset to illustrate locations of testing for the genetic difference between the smaller coastal wolves and the 30% larger occidentalis wolves from the Alaska and Yukon interiors.

Both of these DNA studies emphasize that the nubilus wolves migrated northward to populate Canada as the ice sheets and glaciers melted. They point out that the smaller wolves existed in the south before the larger wolves migrated into northern Canada, and the Weckworth study suggests the coastal wolves should be listed as a separate individual subspecies.

Court Allows Transplants – Then Orders Removal

Readers who actively opposed the FWS option to import Canadian wolves may recall the following events:
In 1994 the Farm Bureau, Audubon Society and other plaintiffs asked the Wyoming Federal District Court to halt wolf introduction because it could not legally occur where naturally occurring wolves already existed per the 10J Rule. But instead of issuing an injunction to halt the process while the arguments were presented, Judge Downes allowed FWS to go ahead and transplant Canadian wolves into Central Idaho and Yellowstone Park for three years until he issued his ruling in December of 1997.

Then after setting aside the final wolf introduction rules as unlawful, Judge Downes ordered FWS to remove all Canadian wolves and their progeny from both experimental population areas. This ruling was met with loud criticism by the wolf activists, including the state and federal wildlife agencies who apparently believed they could get by with ignoring both state and federal laws when it suited their agenda.

Judge “Passes the Buck” to Appeals Court

They quickly pointed out that it would not be possible to even locate most of the wolves – much less capture them. But even if that were possible, both Canadian Provinces refused to allow the wolves to return and there were not enough zoos willing to accept several hundred wild wolves so killing most was the only option.

Judge Downes could have prevented this disaster from occurring by simply putting wolf introduction on hold three years earlier until his decision was reached. But the second time he did essentially the same thing by later staying execution of his removal order pending an appeals decision by the 10th Circuit Court.

On January 13, 2000, five years after the first large Canadian wolves were introduced, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the December 1998 Wyoming District Court ruling that the reintroduction program was unlawful and should be revoked. The appeals court admitted that the evidence showed native irremotus wolves already existed when the larger Canadian wolves were introduced, but said FWS had the authority to determine what constituted a population.
The fact that the resident wolves coexisted with abundant big game populations and with negligible impact on livestock and human activity was already a matter of record in 1994. But on August 12, 1994, FWS Wolf Leader Ed Bangs sent a letter to Charles Lobdell telling him to stop issuing statements to the public advising that the number of reported resident wolves was increasing.

Bangs’ letter advised that FWS planned to introduce wolves from Canada and said: “From this day forward…confirmed wolf activity (will only include) individual wolves or members of packs that have been examined, radio-collared and monitored in the wild.” He also said he had transferred $9,000 to the FWS Boise Field Office to search for wolves and organize flights to locate any radio-collared wolves that might be in Idaho or the Yellowstone area during the summer and fall.

Bangs also included key issues to be presented to the public consistently by FWS:
“1. (I)t is likely that wolf populations would ultimately recover without reintroduction and breeding pairs of wolves would likely occur in Idaho before they would occur (in) Yellowstone.

4. Experimental populations will not knowingly contain a significant portion of the territory of any naturally occurring breeding pair that has successfully raised young. However once wolves are released all wolves in the area will be treated as experimental animals.”

Despite reported wolf sightings by more then 120 outfitters, trappers and others in less than two months, most in the same location where Kemery mapped three wolf pack areas from 1988-1991, and despite the USFS road closure to protect existing wolves (see Bulletin 35), Bangs dumped Canadian wolves halfway between the two known native wolf locations guaranteeing their extermination.

In February of 2012, I forwarded the Weckworth DNA study, without comment, to Dr. Valerius Geist. The following was his reply:

“Thank you, George, I have seen this study. To me it suggests that there was indeed a remnant of native wolves in Idaho that were finally done away with by introduced wolves from Canada. The native wolves would have been of the same clad as the coastal wolves. Anyway, that’s testable since some museum specimens of native Idaho wolves are still available for genetic analysis. However, somebody competent and trustworthy needs to do it. Cheers, Val Geist.”

Share