December 11, 2019

Create, Embellish, Offer Solution

If one was to consider the truth that, as referenced below, the “world dictatorship of the enlightened elite” causes and/or creates all the crises in the world. Once exposed and firmly labeled as a crisis, or terror attack, climate catastrophe, disease, epidemic, etc., the same group, i.e. the “world dictatorship of the enlightened elite,” embellishes the event blowing it into the largest of false proportions as possible. This frightens the masses readying them for the final solution…if you will. After this, the “world dictatorship of the enlightened elite” rush in with a solution…perhaps a solution as so described below.

But, by all means,

DON’T GO LOOK!

“Isn’t it interesting that no matter what the current global crisis is, according to leftists, the solution is always the same: a benevolent world dictatorship of the enlightened elite, and mass transfer of wealth from rich nations to poor nations.

That’s what they want to do about global warming. It’s what they wanted to do about overpopulation. It’s what they wanted to do about endangered species.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Exclusive: The UN starts toward new control over the world’s oceans

The United Nations has launched a far-reaching initiative that could give U.N.-sponsored authorities sway over the biological resources of the high seas—all the waters that lie outside national territories and economic zones.

The potential shift in power involves multi-trillion-dollar issues, such as whether large areas—conceivably, as much as 30 percent– of the world’s international waters should be designated as no-go areas to protect biological diversity; whether and how to require elaborate “environmental impact assessments” for future ocean development projects; and how to divide up the economic benefits from the future development of “marine genetic resources.”

Source: Exclusive: The UN starts toward new control over the world’s oceans | Fox News

Share

World Wildlife Fund and International Union for Conservation of Nature Marry

“When developing countries want to use money provided through international environmental treaties to carry out projects – such as helping farmers adapt to changes in the weather, or to monitor biodiversity – they will be able to call on the World Wildlife Fund or the International Union for the Conservation of Nature to manage the work.

Both groups are becoming official project agencies of the Global Environment Facility.

They are joining the likes of the World Bank, U.N. Food and Agriculture Organisation, and Asian Development Bank in helping to oversee billions of dollars in environmental spending made possible through contributions from richer countries.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Manipulation of Plans Toward One-World Government

“The text of a 19-page, international trade agreement being drafted in secret was published by WikiLeaks on Thursday as the transparency group’s editor commemorated his two-year anniversary confined to the Ecuadorian Embassy in London.

Fifty countries around the globe have already signed on to the Trade in Service Agreement, or TISA, including the United States, Australia and the European Union. Despite vast international ties, however, details about the deal have been negotiated behind closed-doors and largely ignored by the press.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

United Nations First World Wildlife Day – March 3

WorldWildlifeDay“While the threats to wildlife are great, we can reduce them through our collective efforts. On this inaugural World Wildlife Day, I urge all sectors of society to end illegal wildlife trafficking and commit to trading and using wild plants and animals sustainably and equitably”

Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon

What could possibly go wrong?

The United Nations, where evidence indicates will be the operational foundation of a One World Government within the existing New World Order, wants to ensure that they control ALL resources, including wildlife and wild plants. Therefore, the UN has created the first World Wildlife Day in order to expedite effort.

In the quote above we see the trumped-up, misleading allegations of illegal trafficking of wildlife, as a tool to help convince people that all wildlife will be lost if we don’t stop poaching and illegal trafficking and let government run things. This is then glossed over stating a need to “commit” in a “sustainably and equitably” way, the means of controlling wild plants and animals. This means government fascists deciding the what, when and how of land access, use, and consumption of natural resources. The call is to turn the control of wildlife over to government.

In an article behind a pay wall at the Wall Street Journal, Arancha González, the executive director of the International Trade Centre, a joint agency of the United Nations and the World Trade Organization, parrots the cries of General Ban Ki-moon.

Combating illegal trade has been the focus of much recent attention. But the real question is how to set up a well-managed legal trade that is sustainably managed and benefits the poor rural communities where many threatened species are found.

We also see how this fake program of creating “sustainable” trade of “well-managed” wildlife, that “benefits the poor rural communities” will be accomplished.

Giving rural communities the right economic incentives is critical to protecting wildlife. This is difficult in countries with weak governance and high levels of poverty.

Why not ask here why countries have “weak governance and high levels of poverty?” In other words, the lie here is that if the “poor rural communities,” in which the UN is complicit in creating, allow for more government, i.e. United Nations One World Government under a New World Order, control over them, they will be bribed with money. They choose to call it “incentives.” In return, the money will go back to the corporate fascists while the poor remain poor and have given up their access to the utilization of natural resources to when and only when the United Nations tells them they can. And don’t hold your breath waiting for permission.

The United Nations fascists state about World Wildlife Day:

Wildlife has an intrinsic value and contributes to the ecological, genetic, social, economic, scientific, educational, cultural, recreational and aesthetic aspects of sustainable development and human well-being.

Please note here that little is directed in this statement about people, the residents, the slaves, the serfs, the taxpayers, i.e. you and me. Wildlife, to the United Nations and other fascist governments, including corporate fascism, run by the wealthy global ruling establishment, do see the exact value as described above, but only for themselves. As ignorant as we have been made, we still wallow in the lies that government is looking out for you and me. When will we get it? When will we do something about it?

Like Earth Day and all the rest, the One World Government of the United Nations wants you and I to cede over all land and wildlife to them to control in order that THEY can ensure their wants for “ecological, genetic, social, economic, scientific, educational, cultural, recreational and aesthic aspects of sustainable development and human (elite) well-being.”

Readers should try to understand that the UN’s effort in fabricating this fake World Wildlife Day, has nothing to do with protecting plants and animals and everything to do with complete human control. The world is overrun with useful idiots, the “True Believers” who will do the bidding of the UN and other fascist governments and corporations to perpetuate the myths and the nonsense; those people convinced they are saving plants and animals, not realizing they are destroying the very essence of what it is they think they are protecting.

Indoctrination and propaganda are powerful, powerful tools.

Share

Kalifornia Labels Gasoline as Cause for Global Warming

I have always read that Californication is the testing ground for how much Americans can take and how they react to issues that are intended to be implemented in the One World Government as part of the New World Order.

For those who actually thought most people had caught onto the fraud of global warming, isn’t this proof the Governments don’t care? So what do you call a state that does exactly what it wants, when it wants and to whom it wants and to hell with the people? Answers due by noon tomorrow.

GasWarning

Share

Sec. Kerry Will Sign UN Arms Treaty Today

gunandscalesofjusticeBefore there is complete panic in the streets from the Second Amendment advocates, please realize that Secretary of State John Kerry’s signature on an arms treaty with the UN is not “the supreme law of the land.” All treaties MUST be ratified by the United States Senate and signed by the president.

Having said that, there is trouble on the horizon. It was back last April, shortly after the announcement that the United States would sign on to the newest version of a UN arms treaty, that I wrote:

Whether it’s the Obama Administration or the next or next, they will succeed in getting guns away from the American population. Historical odds are stacked heavily in favor of that happening. I will repeat myself one more time and say that the millions and millions of guns owned by a few million U.S. citizens is the only and last deterrent keeping us away from total despotic and tyrannical rule.

Historically I have heard the naysayers stating that we will never lose our right to keep and bear arms and yet the same naysayers have not followed the history about guns and rights. They fail to see or admit that those rights are slowly but surely being eaten away at and in time will disappear.

The UN Arms Trade Treaty defines what kind of weaponry will be included that will be tightly “controlled” by the United Nations Office of Disarmament Affairs (UNODA). Beginning on Page 4 of the treaty, Article 2, “Scope”, Section 1, the last item on the list is, “Small Arms and Light Weapons.”

So, yes, this treaty will involve the regulation by the UNODA of the buying and selling of the guns and ammunition many Americans enjoy and possess. Of course the United Nations and the totalitarian leaders of our government are making every effort to exploit events like Syria and Kenya to lie to people and tell them that if such a treaty was in effect, these events wouldn’t happen. No, seriously, they are.

Many that are in opposition to this treaty say that if the U.S. ratifies this treaty, we would be required to devise some kind of tracking system of all our weapons, including private ownership. On Page 5 of the Treaty, Article 3, “Ammunition/Munitions” it reads:

Each State Party shall establish and maintain a national control system to regulate the export of ammunition/munitions fired, launched or delivered by the conventional arms covered under Article 2 (1), and shall apply the provisions of Article 6 and Article 7 prior to authorizing the export of such ammunition/munitions.

How do you suppose the United States of America would devise a “national control system?” I can only imagine and I’ll leave that up to you.

However, think globally. All signatories of this Treaty must abide by the same rules. I would then assume that some of our favorite foreign-made guns and ammunition will be strictly regulated by the UNODA.

As anyone can imagine, the Treaty is a legal nightmare, intentionally left vague and confusing in order that self interpretation can result. It is fool’s play to think otherwise. I would, however, like to point out one part of Article 7, “Export and Export Assessment”, (1). Please go read it. It attempts to define certain “relevant factors” that would prohibit the export of ammunition/munitions. These “relevant factors” are deliberately written in order that they can be applied to any condition they deem necessary.

The big question now becomes will the U.S. Senate ratify this treaty? We know Obama would eagerly sign his name to it should the Senate approve. I don’t have a crystal ball but I think I can do a pretty decent job of briefly explaining, based on past history, what will go down.

If this newest arms treaty does not pass muster in the Senate, the events leading up to a vote and all subsequent arms treaty votes in the future, will lead to the eventual disarmament of American citizens; piece by piece. It seems that with each passing Senate vote on UN arms, the margin between those for and against, continues to shrink.

A stand alone disarmament treaty would take decades to pass and thus, like we see repeatedly in our own Houses of Congress, laws get stuffed in and among other bills. A favorite seems to be budget bills. For example, at present Congress is debating about whether to pass a bill to allow the U.S. Government to keep spending money it doesn’t have. In order to get the number of votes necessary to pass, crooked and thieving back room deals are made. The deals often get through with the budget bill and very few, if any, Americans are aware that it happened. This is probably how a disarmament treaty will get passed by the Senate.

With a dumbing down and further indoctrination of the American people, members of Congress will lose sight of the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights. Already we hear political leaders saying that signing this treaty will not effect the right of the American people to keep and bears arms. That’s a lie because it is a limiting of rights.

But with each event of arms treaty proposals, a certain amount of pressure is put on governments, congresses and the citizenry at large to give in, at least some, on giving up the right to keep and bear arms. This is historical, as every day we witness limits on all of our rights. Guns are no different and in some ways might lead the way in that regard.

The U.S. Senate may or may not pass this treaty, but it will come. One way or another we will be disarmed. A one world government cannot succeed so long as U.S. citizens are armed.

Please don’t be fooled into thinking that should the Senate not agree to this treaty, we are out of the woods. The mere act of Secretary of State John Kerry signing this UN Treaty, is an act that promises that the United States will do everything it can to adhere to the terms of this treaty EVEN IF THE SENATE FAILS TO RATIFY.

Mid-term elections are just around the corner. It would be good advice for me to encourage you to call or write your senator and tell them the U.S. in not interested in giving up its sovereignty and being ruled by the United Nations.

Or you can continue to live the lie.

Share

Biden Arrograntly Defines Task to Create New World Order

If you will listen closely, Biden says that globally things are changing and we (he is addressing bankers) need to make changes to keep up with those changes. The New World Order is already here and that New World Order, like any authoritative/government power, must change in order to fulfill its agenda.

There once was a day when any mention of “A New World Order” would have gotten you a trip to the looney house, but today it is spoken of casually in all corners of political and financial discussions. What has yet to be talked much of openly is the call for a One World Government. This is what Biden is alluding to in his address. He sees himself as a member of that One World Government and thus his arrogance.

Share

Day 80 – No Executive Orders

IMPOSTURE!

It is now 80 days since President Obama pretended to sign 23 executive orders on the destruction of gun rights. I have asked the question several times. Does there exist these stealth executive orders that the president is deliberately hiding from the people, or was it all just an act? For sure, nothing about executive orders dealing with gun rights is posted on the White House website.

He Lies!

Jacob Sullum at Reason.com, writes about four things that President Obama said in his address in Colorado the other day that breeds “mistrust” in the American people over his efforts to reduce Second Amendment gun ownership rights. Listed below are the summary of his four ideas. Please follow the link and read more of his explanations. I will provide my own commentary.

It is my opinion that Mr. Sullum left a fifth item off his list. I will add it below the following four items.

1. He conflates a failed background check with stopping a criminal from obtaining a gun.
I believe it was the Virginia Tech killer who passed his background check just fine. But facts aren’t important when a tyrannical agenda is in motion.

2. He falsely equates “assault weapons” with military guns.
Yesterday I posted a story of how the President, in a speech, told attendees that the Sandy Hook killer used a “fully automatic” weapon to kill 26 people. My questions about this statement were wanting to know if the President is too ignorant to know the difference between a “fully automatic” and a semi-automatic, a bolt action, lever action, revolver, pump, etc.; The second question was whether the President knows this information and is only attempting to embellish and incite anyone willing to listen in order to fulfill his despotic ambitions; Or, that the President knew Adam Lanza used an automatic weapon and he’s been keeping it from the people.

3. He says there is no logical connection between “universal background checks” and gun registration.
I have never and will never obtain a permit to carry a weapon because it is a violation of my Second Amendment rights. Obtaining a permit is nothing more than gun registration. Universal background checks accomplishes the same thing and does nothing to curb violence and protect children. The ignorance here is that people are made to believe that a criminal, intent on killing someone, will not do it because they have to undergo a background check. It’s like saying a car thief won’t steal a car because they don’t have a valid driver’s license.

4. He pooh-poohs the idea that there could ever be anything adversarial about the relationship between Americans and their government.
And this is the most tell-tailing statement any would-be despot would make. Obama is on record as stating that the Founding Fathers got it all wrong because they put restrictions on government. Since taking office, this President has done more than his share to tear down those restrictions on government and put all the power into his own hands. And this same President wants to declare that government is our friend and we should, without question, follow him over the cliff? No thank you.

This is where I will add number five.

5. The President is a liar.
Not really unlike the boy who cried wolf, President Obama is a notorious liar. Nothing that comes from his mouth can and should be believed. He has made his own bed and he should lay in it. No person can spend every waking minute of their presidential term making and breaking promises to the degree this man has and expect that the people of the United States would trust him.

This may be one of the reasons this President feels the need to circumvent the legislative process established in our country by using executive order abuses because he fails miserably in leading the people of this country due to his deliberate and excessive lying.

Biased News Reporting

What else is new, right? CBS announced that it will be airing a 60-Minutes program in which, “Some of the parents and family of the 26 children and adults killed in the mass shooting in Newtown, Conn., tell Scott Pelley their mission for gun control will last throughout their lifetimes.”

Who can blame the parents for trying to do something, even if they are being misled and/or misguided. This isn’t the issue here. The real issue is that CBS’s 60-Minutes have “some” of the parents and in the leaked portion of the upcoming show, the talk is all in favor of opposition to gun rights. I’m wondering if the full broadcast will include some of the parents who disagree with this assault on the Second Amendment, and/or would like to see more of a focus and assault on the real root of violence, what causes it and how to correct it?

UN Gun Treaty and One World Government

It really should come as no surprise that the United States, under the direction of President Obama, has signed on to the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty. For some, it still comes as a surprise that the U.S. Senate must ratify that treaty. Previously, in a resolution voted on in the Senate, by a 53-46 vote, it resolved that it would not vote to approve a United Nations gun control treaty. I believe that margin of difference remains safe for now, as a two-thirds majority vote is required.

However, this should not deter people from contacting their Senators to make sure they oppose this treaty. In addition, Americans should familiarize themselves well with this treaty that Obama has signed, because when the United States falls into the control of a One World Government, indications being it will be administered by the United Nations, this treaty should give us an indication as to how guns will be control and confiscated by that power.

Share

Free Markets Have No Place in Club of Rome Communism

Graeme Maxton writing for his brainwashed, ignorant, non thinking followers of communism/socialism on the Club of Rome’s website, essentially dedicates one paragraph to free market/free enterprise:

The free market is still the best way we know to allocate many resources. It ensures that goods and services are delivered to those that need them in the most efficient way, for the lowest possible price. Moreover, it strives to improve this process continuously, making the system ever leaner and driving prices ever lower. By making every penny go further, this makes us better off and so improves our standard of living. The free market is also exceptional in that it not only pushes down prices, it raises profits too. It serves everyone by stimulating growth, supporting investment and aiding human development. It is also astonishingly flexible, with the ability to respond to the changing needs of the market without falling apart. The system is fair too, or at least mostly fair. It rewards those who are efficient and competitive while stragglers are swiftly killed off.

The remainder of the article is spent explaining why the free market no longer has a use in the new world order of socialism/communism. For all the haters of humans, themselves excluded of course, this piece of propaganda clap-trap should be right up your alley. It is complete with how free markets destroy the planet, i.e. global warming, species extinction, forests being destroyed, all the fish caught, etc.

Take note that Maxton says there is nothing any better that exists for its purpose than a free market system and yet, he and his associates at the Club of Rome, no longer want that. It is a threat to them. It is a danger toward their ability to wield power over the masses, to control the food, control the products, control all manufacturing; in essence control all the resources but most of all, a free market society extols independence and that is the biggest threat to people like Maxton.

Destroy that independence and their jobs become so much easier.

Share