December 8, 2019

Vaccines and Retroviruses: A Whistleblower Reveals What the Government is Hiding

*Editor’s Note* – This article begins by stating: “These non-HIV retroviruses were unintentionally introduced into humans over the past 75 years.” I would have to disagree with that statement. It would be more accurate to state it this way: These non-HIV retroviruses (and other human-killing agents) were INTENTIONALLY introduced into humans over the past 75 years.

Retrovirus exposure intensified in the 1970s as new vaccines and pharmaceutical products were developed. These retroviruses and related infectious agents are now associated with dozens of modern chronic illnesses – perhaps nearly all of them. In these diseases, infection leads to inflammation — and unresolved inflammation can lead to chronic disease.

The list of diseases stretches from autism to cancer and from Chronic Fatigue Syndrome to Alzheimer’s. The diseases cripple the development of the young, steal the productivity and enjoyment of life for adults, and provide a slow and withering death to the elderly.

Source: Vaccines and Retroviruses: A Whistleblower Reveals What the Government is Hiding

Share

Murdered Holistic Doctors Had Discovered Autism/Cancer-Causing Enzyme Intentionally Being Added to All Vaccines

So apparently the holistic doctors who were all being killed in Florida had found out via their research that the nagalase enzyme protein is INTENTIONALLY being added to the population via immunizations. Nagalase STOPS vitamin D from binding to the Gc protein. This completely strips a human being’s body of it’s natural ability to kill cancer cells. Nagalase is a protein that’s also created by all cancer cells. This protein is also found in very high concentrations in autistic children. And they’re PUTTING it in our vaccines!! This prevents the body from utilizing the Vitamin D necessary to fight cancer and prevent autism. Nagalese disables the immune system. It’s also known to cause Type 2 Diabetes. So basically…they weren’t  killing these doctors because they had found the cure to cancer or were successfully treating autism… they’re killing them because these Dr’s had been researching and had the evidence that the vaccines they’re injecting our precious children with are CAUSING our current cancer and autism crisis!! And that it’s obviously being done knowingly and on purpose! The doctors they killed in Florida had been collaborating and were getting ready to go public with the information.

Source: Murdered Holistic Doctors Had Discovered Autism/Cancer-Causing Enzyme Intentionally Being Added to All Vaccines | Alternative

Share

Chemical Aerosol Spraying and How it Relates to Wolf Introduction

And think about this for a moment. Why do you suppose agencies like Fish and Wildlife are so eager to reintroduce wolves and other species into areas of the country which haven’t seen these animals for generations. It’s all part of the plan to restore this land to what the elite envision as its early paradise-like state, with wild animals freely roaming the uninhabited plains and forests. Granted, it will take some time to clean up the place and to maybe destroy a lot of small towns that might otherwise be considered a blight on the landscape. But for the global elite it will be a small price for us to pay for their enjoyment.

Source: Chemtrails – An Insider Speaks Out – TGS HiddenMysteries ThE~Magazine Feb 2000 Vol 10

Share

Vatican Plans Removal of 6 Billion People under new ‘Earth Constitution’ and ‘World Government’

But don’t go look!

Vatican speaker and California Governor in push for massive depopulation… talk of ‘Planetary Court’ and removal of 6 billion people under new ‘Earth Constitution’ and ‘World Government’

Source: Vatican speaker and California Governor in push for massive depopulation… talk of ‘Planetary Court’ and removal of 6 billion people under new ‘Earth Constitution’ and ‘World Government’ – NaturalNews.com

Share

PA Bear Population Has Quadrupled…….Without Baiting

“Pennsylvania’s black bear population has nearly quadrupled since the 1970s, and black bears have reestablished themselves in upper Bucks County. Officials say this leads to more frequent sightings in suburban areas, particularly as young male bears forage for food and free land in early summer.”<<<Read More>>>

Those in Maine fighting to rid the landscape of their perceived inhumane bear hunting, argue that the implementation of bait to lure a bear to a shooting area, causes bears to get fatter and thus increases the number of offspring causing the bear population to rise which results in increased encounters between humans and the beast. If that is true, which it’s not, then how do you explain Pennsylvania’s claim that their bear population has grown by a multiple of 4 and they don’t utilize bear baiting as a management tool?

Share

Maine Should Increase Bag Limit on Bears From One Bear to Two

Perhaps it is time for the Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife(MDIFW) to put their money where their mouth is and increase the bear harvest bag limit to two bears per licensed hunter rather than leave it at one. MDIFW has often said that they are concerned that too few bears are being harvested each season and that the population is growing too large. Yet, they refuse to do anything proactive about the situation.

In the meantime, the anti human organization, Humane Society of the United States, is presenting a citizen’s initiative this fall to ban bear hunting. MDIFW is rightfully making the claim that with essentially removing all viable forms of being able to control the bear population would present a public safety issue.

With the bear population at present, higher than MDIFW thinks it ought to be, at least in some places, MDIFW should practice what they are preaching and take steps now to increase the bear harvest in order to better control the bear population. This also may send a better message to Maine voters that controlling bear populations is a serious issue.

Maine’s neighbors to the north in New Brunswick are considering increasing the bag limit to two animals, up from just one, due to an increase in the bear population believed to be the result of fewer bear hunters coming each year to bag a bear.

Share

It’s Time NOAA Got Out of the Hurricane Forecasting Business

*Editor’s Note* – I live in a hurricane prone zone. I can say, without reservation, that the overwhelming majority of people, also living in this region, mostly disregard what NOAA or the local weatherman has to say about hurricanes and their lack of ability in predicting them. When brought up in discussions, most people snicker and make some comment about the foolishness of paying any attention as “they are never right” in making hurricane predictions. This remains true, not only in long term predictions, but in the short term as well. There were past hurricanes in Florida where people took the advice of government people controllers and ordered or suggested evacuations only to find out in the end the people evacuated right into the direct path of the hurricane. Planned or unplanned?

Yes, these storms are unpredictable in the paths they will take and when you combine that with the failure (or seeming failure) of NOAA to accurately predict storms, this leaves or creates a situation where people actually become more vulnerable to the pending disasters of storms when and if they do make landfall. Because of this, there could very easily be more loss of life by not being properly prepared and/or not taking the necessary steps to avoid being dumped on by a hurricane or other strong storms.

Some, as in the below post, chalk this epic failure on the inability to, not only predict but to come clean on a proper assessment of events pasts. Perhaps then, we should begin to more seriously consider that the actions of NOAA and other governmental agencies, is, in fact, designed to cause people to disregard warnings and such as part of a greater scheme to reduce populations.

Whether major storms, i.e. hurricanes, tornadoes, winter storms, rain events, etc., are natural or man made, or a combination of both, a designed population of ill prepared people could result in serious death toll numbers. Please consider.

Agency Consistently Shows It Possesses Neither Foresight Nor Hindsight

2013 Hurricane Season Might be the Weakest EVER, With 2 Hurricanes, None Major

Yet NOAA Predicted 7-11 Hurricanes, 3-6 Major

Washington, DC – The following is the statement of National Center for Public Policy Research President David A. Ridenour on the conclusion of 2013 Atlantic hurricane season:

Saturday marked the official end of the 2013 Atlantic Hurricane Season and once again, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration proved itself utterly incapable of accurately forecasting hurricanes.

It’s time NOAA stop issuing hurricane forecasts.

In May, the agency predicted an “active or extremely active” hurricane season, forecasting that there would be 7-11 hurricanes, 3-6 major hurricanes, and 13-20 named storms.

The year’s final tally: 2 hurricanes, no major hurricanes, and 13 named storms… not even “close enough for government work.”

This marked the 7th time in the past ten years that NOAA’s hurricane forecast has been wrong and its epic failure this year rivals even its disastrous forecast in 2005, when it predicted there would be 7-9 hurricanes and there ended up being 15.

NOAA’s forecasts were only accurate in 2008, 2010 and 2011. In 2010 and 2011, the actual number of hurricanes just barely fell within NOAA’s forecast range, despite being uncharacteristically large.

Perhaps NOAA could be forgiven, somewhat, if it at least got the post-season analysis right. But it can’t even do that.

In its November 25 mea culpa, sans the culpa (NOAA never mentions its forecast nor its spectacular failure), NOAA asserts that the season ranks as “the sixth-least-active Atlantic hurricane season since 1950, in terms of the collective strength and duration of named storms and hurricanes.”

This is a bit misleading, to say the least. Most Americans would see this statement and conclude that there were five other years since 1950 with less storm activity.

But that’s not what it means.

What NOAA it means is that if you only count the storms that our government noticed, then it is the sixth least active since 1950.

That’s akin to a Keystone Kop facing once direction with all sorts of criminal activity behind his back saying, “No crime around here.”

NOAA is attempting to suggest a degree of precision that it simply does not possess.

It wasn’t until 1966, with the launch of ESSA-1 and ESSA-2, that we had a weather satellite system in place.

Prior to this system, the odds were pretty good that storms – in particular those outside of shipping and travel lanes – would be missed entirely.

Since the start of the satellite age, our capabilities have improved dramatically and this makes it appear as though the number of tropical storms and hurricanes have increased, even when they haven’t.

In terms of the number and intensity of hurricanes, the 2013 hurricane season might be the weakest… EVER.

This year, there were just two weak category 1 hurricanes. The 1982, 1930, 1919, 1917 and 1890 seasons also had two or fewer hurricanes, but at least one in each year was a major hurricane.

Dating back to 1850, there were just a handful of years – 1925 (one), 1914 (zero), 1907 (zero), and 1905 (one) – in which fewer hurricanes were recorded than this year. But because these seasons occurred prior to the advent of satellites, the odds are good that there were more hurricanes in some, if not all, of these years that went undetected.

Being wrong so frequently poses a more significant risk to NOAA than just a little embarrassment. It threatens to undermine the agency’s credibility, undermine the public’s faith in even its short-range forecasts, and ultimately place lives at risk.

And NOAA isn’t alone in undermining it credibility by suggesting a greater level of certainty than it possesses.

For years now, we’ve been told that there is a scientific consensus that our burning of fossil fuels is creating dangerous warming of the planet.

Now the public has learned that we’re in the midst of a 17-year “pause” in global warming that not one of the 73 climate models used by the U.N. Intergovernmental Climate on Climate Change in its Fifth Assessment Report predicted.

In 2002, commenting on the possibility that Iraq had supplied or might supply Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD) to terrorists, Donald Rumsfeld, then Secretary of Defense, famously said: “…there are known knowns… There are known unknowns… But there are also unknown unknowns – there are things we do not know we don’t know.”

NOAA, the IPCC and other voices of science should be as candid and honest.

The National Center for Public Policy Research, founded in 1982, is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from individuals, less than four percent from foundations, and less than two percent from corporations. It receives over 350,000 individual contributions a year from over 96,000 active recent contributors.

Contributions are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated.

Share

PETA Says Eating Chicken Causes Small Penises

And I would imagine from that stupid conclusion, PETA would say small penises are what causes men to go out and shoot animals. That seems to be the only reason they can give for anyone wanting to eat good food.

We all know how fringe PETA is and like most any organization with an agenda, they will do and say most anything to promote that agenda. In this case, PETA doesn’t want the eating of buffalo wings to take place at a buffalo wing convention so they are saying that women who eat chicken during pregnancy will cause their male-born babies to have a small penis.

Whatever!

Of course PETA is going after what may have once been a symbol of “manhood” and now may more closely resemble an object that gets in the way, as seemingly more and more men aren’t much interested in being men at all. Maybe if PETA campaigned on chicken causes men to remain heterosexual would be more effective.

The claim that PETA is basing their perverted proclamation on is that chickens contain a chemical called phthalate. Phthalates are in just about everything we eat and come in contact with. According to Wikipedia (yeah, I know), phthalates are in, ” enteric coatings of pharmaceutical tablets and nutritional supplements to viscosity control agents, gelling agents, film formers, stabilizers, dispersants, lubricants, binders, emulsifying agents, and suspending agents. End-applications include adhesives and glues, electronics, agricultural adjuvants, building materials, personal-care products, medical devices, detergents and surfactants, packaging, children’s toys, modeling clay, waxes, paints, printing inks and coatings, pharmaceuticals, food products, and textiles.”

And so the only remaining question becomes, what does exposure to and ingestion of phthalates do to us humans? High doses (whatever that is) cause a change in hormone levels (which may be why men are no longer interested in being men), along with certain birth defects.

So, while PETA targets men’s penises because they are a sick and perverted organization, maybe we all should be asking why are so many products, including foods and pharmaceuticals, laced with phthalates? Is one to suppose that the Club of Rome’s depopulation agenda is in play here?

I think I’ll go have a chicken sandwich and think about this for a minute.

Share

Agenda 21, Chapter 8 – The Final Coup

wake-up-america

*Editor’s Note* – The below quote was posted as a comment in an open thread yesterday. I have decided it warranted being places as a front page story for readers to examine and follow up with reading the entire article from which the quote can be found.

From Pakalert Press:

… the plan is brilliant. You reduce the number from 7+ billion by at least 33% without firing one shot. You simply privatize all natural resources and then price access so that the bottom third of the globe’s population cannot afford it. And so, they die; it will be the biggest die-off of the Anthropocene epoch. From Papua New Guinea to Croatia, from Bolivia to Ghana, from Canada to Central America, from Scotland to Nigeria, from Australia to America, forests, water rights, mineral rights, arable land, national parks, and much more is being privatized with the usual outcomes: degradation, displacement of indigenous populations, higher costs, lack of access to necessary resources — starvation, death, social unrest and rebellion… (‘Natural Capital and the Real End Game’, Sandy Krolick)

Share

Bring Low Class Element of Society Under Total Control

This is actually an addendum to the seven-part series I recently completed called, New-Science Wildlife Scientists: Creations of Wellington House. I had intended to include it in part of my work but it got by me. This is important because it shows the intent of the real world leaders, their perversion of the sanctity of life and that the United States of America accepted this premise as U.S. Policy under President Jimmy Carter.

The Club of Rome was ordered by The Committee of 300 to craft a blueprint that would succeed in destroying a half billion people from this planet. The plan was titled Global 2000 and this plan employed aspects of Tavistock Institute’s brainwashing techniques.

Those assigned to devise Global 2000 agreed that what they perceived as the “low-class” element of humans, sometimes referred to as “useless eaters”, needed to be brought under control. From there, they could be trained and then as a result of that training, do with them as they wished. One way this was to be accomplished was to create the lousiest education industry in which no real useful information was taught, rather to use this as a means to control the “useless eaters” and force them through mind control to accept their roles.

Below is part of what was written from the conference of Global 2000:

Technically, children must be ‘orphaned’ in day care centers under government control. With such an initial handicap, the lower classes will have little hope of upward mobility away from their assigned positions in life. The form of slavery we have in mind is essential for good social order, peace and tranquility.

We have the resources to attack the vitality, options and mobility of the individuals in society by knowing through our social scientist, understanding and manipulating and attacking their sources of social energy (income) and therefore, their physical, mental and emotional strengths and weaknesses. The general public refuses to improve its own mentality. It has become a herd of proliferating barbarians, and a blight on the face of the Earth.

By measuring the economic habits by which the sheep try to run from their problems and escape from reality via the medium of ‘entertainment,’ it is absolutely possible, applying Operation Research methods, to predict the probable combination shocks (created events) which are necessary to bring about complete control and subjugation of the population by subverting the economy. The strategy included the use of amplifiers (advertising) and when we speak on television in the manner that a ten year old can relate to, then because of the suggestions made, that person will purchase that product on impulse, the next time he comes across it in a store.

The balance of power will provide the stability that the world of the 21st century is likely to achieve, rent as it will be, by passionate tribalism and by such seemingly insoluble issues like that posed by mass migration from the South to the North, and from the farm to the city. There may be mass transfers of population, such as those between Greece and Turkey in the aftermath of the First World War; really mass murders. It will be a time of troubles, in need of a unifier; an Alexander or Mohammed.

A great change that will come about as a result of emerging conflicts between peoples who live side by side – and which will, by their intensity, take primacy over their other conflicts – is that political rivalry will be within regions, rather than between them. This will bring about a turning back from global politics. After a decade in which the U.S. and the Soviet Union dueled across oceans, the powers will focus on protecting themselves against forces on their frontiers – or within them.

The American people do not know economic science and care little about it; hence, they are always ripe for war. They cannot avoid war, notwithstanding their religious morality, nor can they find in religion the solution to their earthly problems. They are knocked out of shape by economic experts who cause shockwaves that wreck budgets and buying habits. The American public is yet to realize that we control their buying habits.

Might I remind you, this is not the writing of some rogue theocratic lunatic or other. This is a conclusion, drafted by what we as a people perceive as the leaders of this world, the members of the Club of Rome and The Committee of 300 and policy recognized and agreed to by the United States of America.

How does this bit of knowledge make you feel?

Share