July 3, 2015

Moonbattery » Silver Lining to SCOTUS Homosexual Marriage Outrage

*Editor’s Note* – There’s a couple of issues to touch on lightly for a moment concerning information presented in the article linked to below.

The first is that the idea that the SCOTUS used the 14th Amendment as as the justification for granting Same Sex marriages in all states, and thus should apply to the Second Amendment and make concealed carry equal across all states, is rational thinking – of which cannot be applied to any governmental agency, which includes the SCOTUS. This would imply that rule of law exists, which it does not.

The second issue is that perhaps we are seeing a hint of what’s to come – a warning if you will. I have contended for years that the only element in existence today preventing complete dictatorial rule is that too many Americans own too many guns for the Fascist to operate freely. They will, eventually, win out and try to take our guns away. Eek what a mess that will be.

The mention in the article that perhaps SCOTUS will use the Fourteenth Amendment to repeal the Second Amendment is something to consider. Understand, these fascist pigs will stop at nothing. The law BE DAMNED!

For those lacking understanding of the Fourteenth Amendment, it is time to learn. The Fourteenth Amendment made us all slaves to the Corporation.

Source: Moonbattery » Silver Lining to SCOTUS Homosexual Marriage Outrage

FacebookTwitterGoogle+PinterestLinkedInEmailShare

EDITORIAL Archives – The American Report

This is what we were taught. Is America really losing its sovereignty or is the perception of brainwashed Americans being systematically stripped away?

On July 4, 1776, the Founding Fathers declared their independence from the tyrannical rule of Great Britain. In doing so, they dedicated the newly-founded United States of America to the ideal of Liberty.

Every school child learns these words from the Declaration of Independence:

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights

Source: EDITORIAL Archives – The American Report

HR 1555 Forest Access in Rural Communities Act of 2015

*Editor’s Note* – I was asked to post the following statement:

HR 1555 Forest Access in Rural Communities Act of 2015…. introduced 3/23/15 by Greg Walden with over 40 co-sponsors is on the move…. call or contact your congressman requesting their support sign on to the bill and support OPENING ALL RDS in the USFS, statewide and why not nationally. (If contacting Federal Reps also request open all roads in USFS & BLM….)

Okay folks here is YOUR opportunity to make a difference when it comes to access of our federal lands…. The BLM, USDA, Representatives and House members and USFS’s original mandates are to manage the lands for the benefit of our local communities. Somehow over the years the mission of those administrator’s has been reversed by excluding the local public needs; the lack of concerns on impacts of economy, socially and historically.

The USFS & BLM administrations have worked diligently towards road closures on federal lands denying the citizens motorized access, including handicapped, disabled, aging citizens, young children unable to walk long distances, visitors to local communities, recreation, livestock and wildlife management, other multi users and purposes, in addition to handicapping our way of life, abilities to provide public safety, access to valuable resources and the ability to efficiently effectively protect both.

Many road closures are with and without our local county commissioners, yes the local public representatives that we elect with intentions they have our greatest concerns directly under consideration and notify the public PRIOR to taking further political actions… The federal administration has bargained trading projects with the agreement of roads to be closed upon completion of project…. closed roads without authorization from the your county reps, claimed they want the public’s participation and concerns, however when the majority speaks against those decisions our participation and concerns are ignored, resulting in the federal administration taking YET another detour or uses the ESA or other bargaining chips… Well folks we are out of chips, take a stand, make contacts with county commissioners, state and federal representatives and ask them to support HR 1555 and your rights to access ALL of your federal lands.

I heard a comment the other day that this bill ties the USFS’s hands, this depends on which side of the fence you are actually standing on and do not care about protecting the rights of others. If the USFS (or BLM) does not wish to implement policies and procedure for your protection then this bill is YOUR FAMILY’s, FRIEND’s and HERITAGE PROTECTION FOR OUR FUTURE GENERATIONS. Get active UNITE and FIGHT, together this can be accomplished….

“This approach could allow a level of local participation that has not been experienced in decades. It should be noted, however, that many national environmental groups oppose this approach. Shifting power to the local community implies reducing the influence of national groups on local situations.”

Wolves and Livestock: The Never Ending Battle

Republication of this article by permission of the author:

Please click on the image to enlarge and read First Page:

FPMuleyCrazyWolf

Page Two:
Page Three:
Page Four:
Page Five:
Page Six:
Please note that the publisher forgot to include the following editor’s addendum:

“Since Dr. Kay submitted the manuscript for this article, a federal court in Washington, D.C. has put Wyoming wolves back on the Endangered Species List. That decision has been appealed, but as of now, wolf hunting is NOT permitted in Wyoming.”

*Editor’s Note* – I apologize for having to present this article in the manner in which I did. Due to file upload restricts, I was unable to offer the entire article in one PDF document. I had to break it down into individual pages.

Give Up Your Rights and Hand Over All Your Money: We’re All Going to Die

Nye, the scientist and host of “Bill Nye The Science Guy,” used his speech at Rutgers’s commencement Sunday as a platform to tell students to start voting and find a way to stop climate change.
Source: Bill Nye talks climate change, racial conflict at Rutgers graduation | NJ.com

Where Deflated Balls Really Should Be Put

Let me get this straight. This is YOUR America – land of the brave, the free and what else? So I want to make sure I understand this because obviously nobody else does.

We have a president who lies everyday and loves doing it. He disrespects the constitution and everyday, his little puppet-stringed hands take away my rights and does all he can to destroy even my God-given rights. He has robbed, killed, deceived, murdered and wasted billions of dollars that aren’t his.

We have a former secretary of state, under this same lying president, who has lied, cheated and stole and was responsible for killings and the murder of innocent people. She is part of taking bribes from foreign investors for her husband and then destroys all her evidence so she won’t get caught.

In short, the United States of America is probably the most corrupt it has ever been and spiraling to hell in short order.

And what is the lead headline today? Tom Brady! Demands that he be fired, stripped of his title. Suspended for an entire season, etc. Why? Because the NFL report stated that “PROBABLY” he was aware that a couple of managers were messing with air pressures in footballs. No real proof – just that they think it is “probable.” Nice!

PROBABLY

Last time I checked, at least before the U.S. of A. became a slave state, run by a bunch of brainwashed idiots, pimping for the Vatican, the ruling establishment in this world of hate, “Probably” was not sufficient grounds to destroy a person.

The hypocrites on Fox News, who collectively might have enough brain power to know one should get in out of the rain, while carrying on about free speech and how people should have a right to free speech and be able to draw cartoons of Mohammed, turned to the next story wishing to crucify a man, whom it was obvious from the beginning, hated Tom Brady. What superficial, ignorant, hypocrites. They hate him out of jealousy, I would guess. What other reason is there? Well, other than one has a husband who is a back-up quarterback on….whose team? Another goes through life angry because he really wants to be a sports announcer and now we see why he isn’t one. And the third member is a Jets and Giants fan. Why didn’t these same mental midgets defend Tom Brady’s right to be held innocent until proven guilty. Where does it say, guilty, guilty, guilty, because he PROBABLY did it.

My God! Another example of the sewer in which this fake republic has opted to go live in.

I couldn’t care less about Tom Brady and the Patriots or any other football team. As a matter of fact, I don’t care an iota about any professional sports team or anybody who participates on those teams. This is about a person’s right. It’s about justice.

A 243-page report of the NFL’s investigation concludes that “PROBABLY” cheating occurred. Let’s hang the man by his “BALLS” that nobody can prove anything was done to them.

Meanwhile, the real crooks, the murderers, the thieves in Washington and the White House, walk free because they know they are protected and above the laws levied on us slaves. These have ruled over us for two centuries and there’s no end in sight. The future looks worse.

The Media should go straight to hell, right behind the NFL for issuing such nonsense!

I won’t be watching anymore NFL games or Fox News.

A Disproportionate Number of Veterans Denied 2A Rights

*Editor’s Note* – This is really kind of an old story but now that Senator Chuck Grassley has decided to open up the can of worms again, allow me to point out some things that should be obvious to Americans but evidently it is not.

Below is an article that can be found on Sen. Grassley’s website. It is about sending a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder asking why a disproportionate number of “mentally defective” military veterans are being added to the gun ownership ban list. How big of him.

As will be the case here, and is in all other cases, we are manipulated to focus on the terrible act of what appears to be a too many in one department being declared “mentally defective” while never addressing the real issue.

Why is it that we, once thought to be a free society, sit back and allow fascist government, enabled by totalitarian groups of ignorant people, to take away any of our rights? Why is it somehow acceptable that Government or any of its agents and/or employees, can, with the stroke of a pen, declare any of us mentally unfit to keep and bear arms? Doesn’t anybody alive in this country see this?

Evidently Sen. Grassley, not to pick on him because they are all the same bunch of selfish dictators, wants us to focus on just that there are more veterans that a nuts than other groups. In addition, he has proposed legislation that would allow judges to decide whether or not you or I are out of our freakin’ minds. Now there’s a Government solution for you. Oh, but don’t put on some charade about how terrible I am because I think Government and the Judicial system doesn’t give a damn about my mental health or my Constitutional and God-given rights.

I’ve seen what Government can do. I’ve seen what judges can do. I’ve seen what the Executive can do, and you really are interested in allowing any of them to determine your mental capacity? Hell, I refuse to ever go see a shrink because I will not allow someone who is nuttier than I am to determine how nutty I am. Some mentally defective moron sitting at a desk is allowed to play god?

This is all just nuts!

WASHINGTON – Senator Chuck Grassley of Iowa, Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, is requesting an explanation for why nearly all of the names on the Justice Department’s gun ban list in the “mental defective” category belong to veterans or their dependents.

“It’s disturbing to think that the men and women who dedicated themselves to defending our freedom and values face undue threats to their fundamental Second Amendment rights from the very agency established to serve them. A veteran or dependent shouldn’t lose their Constitutional rights because they need help with bookkeeping,” Grassley said.

All federal agencies are required to report names of individuals to the National Instant Criminal Background Check System’s (NICS) “mental defective” category. Placement on the list prohibits owning or possessing a firearm. The legal standard by which a name is supposed to be reported to the “mental defective” category is whether the individuals are a danger to themselves or others. However, the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) process does not support such findings. Instead VA reports individuals to the gun ban list if an individual merely needs financial assistance managing VA benefits. Although the VA process is not designed to regulate firearm ownership, it results in veterans and their loved ones being barred from exercising their fundamental, Constitutionally-guaranteed Second Amendment rights.

In a letter to Attorney General Eric Holder, Grassley outlined concerns that a number of failures, including the inconsistent application of standards and weak due process protections, are leading to a disproportionate number of names submitted to the gun ban list by the VA. Grassley notes that it appears veterans are particularly singled out and should not be required by the VA to shoulder the entire burden to prove that they have the ability to exercise their Second Amendment rights.

Grassley introduced legislation last Congress that included a provision requiring a judicial authority to find individuals to be a danger to themselves or others in order to be added to the mental defective category within NICS. This legislation would have effectively overturned administrative actions by the VA to add individuals to the NICS simply because they were unable to manage their financial affairs.

According to Congressional Research data from 2012, 99.3 percent of all names reported to NICS’ “mental defective” category were supplied by the VA. A 2013 Senate report indicated little change in that statistic.

Text of Grassley’s letter is below. A signed copy can be found here.

Mining Wars Cometh!

“For the past several years, the miners from the Galice Mining District, about 3o minutes west of Grants Pass, Oregon, have been arguing over who has the rights to the minerals in the ground around Galice Creek. The Galice mining district is compiled of a number of claims, owners and miners and has been in continuous operation since the early 1870’s, which makes it one of the longest running operations in the US. This specific operation predates the BLM bureaucracy by many decades in fact.”<<<Read More>>>

Bad Information Used In Attempt To Convince Voters On Concealed Carry

A bill is being proposed in the Maine Legislature that would do away with the concealed carry permitting process. One person, whose opinion was published in the Portland Press Herald, gives a list of reasons why this bill shouldn’t happen. His reasons are seriously flawed. Voters should understand that. Here’s a look at some of this person’s claims:

1. “The current system recognizes that concealed guns are dangerous and can be easily used for criminal purposes.” This simply is not true. The current system has been put in place because of ignorance of facts, along with totalitarians who just can’t resist stealing the right of self-defense from others. This statement assumes that we are to believe that when guns are concealed on a person, the person is more apt to commit a criminal offense. What attention is given to any laws by someone wishing to carry out a criminal offense?

2. “Polling consistently shows that more than 80 percent of Mainers support laws that improve gun safety..” Whether that statistic is true or not, doesn’t matter. It has nothing to do with the proposed legislation. It is a matter of one’s opinion, rather than fact, as to whether Maine residents consider concealed carry a matter of gun safety. Mainers may support gun safety, but it is quite doubtful that anything approaching 80% would oppose this proposed bill.

3. “…carrying a gun openly tends to attract the attention of bank guards, convenience store cashiers, police officers on patrol and the rest of us who are trying to keep our distance from people who aren’t emotionally stable.” Seriously? Isn’t this nothing more than the revelation of a person who lives in emotional fear over the day to day? Who walks about in fear, “to keep our distance from people who aren’t emotionally stable?” I think they designed padded rooms specifically for that kind of behavior.

4. “More guns do not make us safer.” In fact they do. Repeatedly it has been shown that an armed citizenry is safer than an unarmed one. Consider violent crime rates in places like Chicago and Washington, D.C. where guns are banned from everyone except the elite chosen few.

5. “They [guns] regularly kill and injure their owners and their owners’ children, spouses and partners.” Guns don’t do anything. They just lay where they are placed. From this person’s perspective, it would seem better to demand a ban on people. People kill people.

6. “We require a license to drive a car, in order to ensure that drivers are responsible. The current concealed-weapon system has the same rationale.” The author here forgets one very important difference between driving a car and having a right to keep and bear arms. Driving is a privilege in which a person must earn it. Keeping and bearing arms is a right guaranteed under the Second Amendment and self-defense is a right given us from God.

7. “…it protects all of us from guns in the wrong hands – or pockets.” No, it does not. To state that somehow requiring a permit to carry a concealed weapon keeps guns out of the hands of criminals, who consequently can hurt a lot of people, is misleading and irresponsible. It must be stated again that criminals have no interest in laws, especially public safety laws, created in error to convince people it will stop crimes. It just isn’t the truth.

The author went out of his way to show that other states have laws similar to the current requirements for concealed carry in Maine, but failed to mention states like Alaska and nearby Vermont. Those two states do not require a permit to carry a handgun concealed. Do these states have a higher rate of crime?

In a Rigged System a Bill to Allow Access for Hunting, Fishing

For decades the rigged system many people wrongfully label a democracy or a constitutional republic, has worked at every opportunity to prohibit hunters, trappers and fisherman from as much access to land as can possibly be done. At the same time efforts exist to ban hunting and rob people of their right to keep and bear arms. If they can’t do this outright, they will accomplish the same through what is often called incrementalism or back door regulations to chip away at any and all aspects of hunting, fishing and trapping, including land access.

Then along comes another effort to put an end, at least to some degree, to the continued prohibitions against land access and those who helped to build the rigged system cry foul and claim preferential treatment.

According to Pajamas Media, the Sportsman’s Act of 2015, “builds on previous efforts and adds new provisions to increase access and provide new opportunities for Americans to enjoy our federal lands.”

It appears that in this bill there are provisions that contradict the existing laws surrounding “wilderness” regions – those areas set aside as preferential treatment to only those wishing to see access to federal lands restricted to specific groups or individuals.

And herein we see the hypocrisy and elitist attitudes coming out from those who promote “wilderness” for their own selfish purposes.

“Certain language [in the act] may be interpreted to allow activities in wilderness areas that are not consistent with the Wilderness Act,” Ellis explained.

Leslie Weldon, deputy chief for the National Forest System at the U.S. Forest Service, a division of the Department of Agriculture, expressed concern that the bill seems to give preferential treatment to hunting, fishing and recreational shooting. That could prove problematic given the wide range of activities enjoyed on public lands — and the service’s charge to accommodate everyone from bird watchers and hikers to school groups, photographers and, indeed, hunters and fishermen.

Please understand this. As it exists now, within the rigged system developed and designed to eliminate hunting, fishing and trapping, preferential treatment is being promoted by restricting activities by some in order to promote the desires of others in an exclusive use – and they fear such a bill would be preferential to hunters and fishermen.

Also understand that that those who seem to believe they have a right to own and restrict others, lament that such a bill would cause problems because their choice in recreational activities might be infringed upon in order to accommodate others. This is the result of years of brainwashing that hunting, trapping and fishing is bad and shouldn’t be allowed, giving people the false belief that they have exclusive rights to use the land and that right shouldn’t be at all restricted in order to accommodate others. This is the epitome of blind selfishness.