April 24, 2017

The Mind; With nothing in it.

Circle Theology.  The Role of Religion in Leadership.

 

Filth and Decadence to Prop Up Wolf Protection

It’s the way of the world. Filthy and perverted “Hollyweird” reprobates moronically speaking out against anything that someone has told them is inhumane treatment of animals, often while wearing furs and sporting alligator purses, etc. Treatment of animals is not “inhumane” because animals are not human and certainly are not men and were not created in that same image. If you choose to lower your standards to be equal to that of a filthy animal, have at it. None of this, however, stops the media from spreading and supporting the ignorance, hypocrisy and disgusting filth of Satan’s world. They are a large part of it.

I read an article yesterday that I just found so perverse I closed it out, because of my own desire to “come out of her.” And yet the topic and the approach bothered me. I feel it is important, if for no other reason, to try to expose the harvest of Satanic seed sowing. Perhaps, if just one person, can “come out of her” my tasks will not have been in vein.

The foundation of the article dealt with those upset because officials in British Columbia are killing wolves as part of their management plan partly to protect other threatened species, particularly those in danger from the actions of wolves. As is typically found in about 99.9% of media, we read about animals in a human context. The article isn’t clear as to the origins of the term, but those complaining use a term called a “Judas Wolf.” Evidently a Judas Wolf is some moron’s idea of one collared wolf used to “betray” the other wolves in his pack, i.e. giving up the location of the pack so government officials can more easily kill the wolves that need to be killed.

It’s not worth discussing the intellectual garbage offered by those who think animals are at or above the same social and ethical levels as man. Giving the action to kill wolves by the British Columbia government some sort of human characteristic, and in this case attempt to give it an extra bit of “umpf” by wrongly and ignorantly likening it to what tiny bit of Biblical history they might have remembered while studying to be a servant in Satan’s Service, is actually irrelevant. Scientific wolf management calls for the population control of wolves for the betterment of all species, including man, and it only makes sense that this task, like it or not, be carried out in the best way possible. If that results in using a collared wolf to locate the rest of the pack and destroying all in that pack, then so be it. Get over it. The wolves don’t know the difference…and I know for some this comes as a huge shock.

But here’s something that I don’t know just how much people can or want to see the disgusting nature of. In the article, it reads: “The wolf cull has been mired in controversy since it began. The province’s practice of using snipers in helicopters to gun down grey wolves has drawn criticism from the likes of pop star Miley Cyrus and film actress Pamela Anderson.”

This media outlet wants to support the idea that wolf management is not a good thing and so what better way to reveal their hand than to attempt to prop up their own perversion and misguided beliefs by invoking the names of two of the biggest and slimiest perverts of Hollyweird.

Somehow sane people are supposed to find comfort in having the support of Miley Cyrus and Pamela Anderson, standing up against sensible wildlife management? What? You can’t see my point? Miley Cyrus, once a Disney star (a great staging ground for Satan’s entertainment industry) has to her credit some of the most bizarre and perverse actions, enough to make any person with half a bag of morals vomit. She appears naked in public half of the time. She once staged an event where she, half clothed, appears to be giving Bill Clinton oral sex. She constantly grabs her crotch, kisses other women on the lips, eats fans underwear, and goes through the motions of having sex on stage (twerking).

Pamela Anderson, a woman who made her millions baring her breasts, is not much better. She once considered suicide because the renovations to one of her houses was costing too much and taking too long. All sane people think those things. She insists on only allowing her photograph to be taken by specific camera lenses, because those make her look better. She has tried suing people taking her picture with an “EYE” phone.

When you consider the combined mentality of these two bimbos and their entertainment history, only a brain-dead idiot would find any credibility in anything they had to say about wildlife management or even the treatment of animals. Perhaps the two would have more credibility if they went on stage and had sex with a wolf…but that would be inhumane treatment of the poor nasty dogs.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!