December 18, 2017

Yes, It Is Gun Control. Picking The Rope That Will Hang You

Recently the U.S. House of Representatives passed the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act and “FixNICS”. When I first wrote about this, my comment was that the supposed gun rights advocates, like the National Shooting Sports Foundation (NSSF) and the National Rifle Association (NRA), were claiming a big victory.

The Senior Vice President and General Counsel for the National Shooting Sports Foundation shows us just how these types think who want to limit your right to keep and bear arms by saying they are not doing that. “…And, despite what some have falsely claimed, it [H.R. 38] will do so while not interfering with the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding Americans.

“The National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) was established 17 years ago with Congressional passage of the Brady Act. Today, it is generally not known that the instant criminal background check system itself was the recommendation of the firearms industry, long before there was a Brady Act. The operating principle then and now is to protect the Second Amendment rights of law-abiding citizens — and the lawful commerce in firearms — while denying access to firearms by those prohibited by current law from purchasing or possessing guns.”

I have pointed out before the hypocrisy of those who eagerly rave that making laws to restrict gun ownership only punishes law-abiding people, and yet, a group such as the NSSF wants to sell us on the idea that THEIR “FixNCIS” is “is not a ‘gun control’ measure” and somehow will only affect criminals and the mentally ill.

In addition, the General Counsel believes that simply because a gun control law has existed for 17 years, with age it loses its label as gun control. He also points out that it was the gun industry that introduced background check gun rights limitations. Again, I ask, just because a part-time Second Amendment supporter creates a law limiting the inalienable rights of a person to keep and bear arms and to protect themselves, their families and their property, it is not gun control?

I get sick and tired of the fake gun rights people laying claim that nobody in America wants criminals and the mentally ill to be able to buy guns and their willingness to give up their rights thinking this will accomplish that. When the narrative fits, these clowns state that no laws will keep a criminal from getting possession of a gun. They then turn around a promote legislation that they are trying to promote as one that will keep criminals from getting a gun. This makes absolutely no sense. Somehow there must be money in this, but from whom?

And then there’s the “mentally ill” side of this fascist law that nobody seems to want to talk about. It’s so tidy and clean how NSSF presents this: “…to ensure that the system has all the appropriate disqualifying criminal and adjudicated mental health records put into it. We have been successful through our direct efforts with 16 state legislatures to pass reforms to ensure that there are no statutory, regulatory, administrative or procedural impediments to entering all appropriate records into NICS.”

Did you get that? “…to ensure that there are no statutory, regulatory, administrative or procedural IMPEDIMENTS…” (emphasis added)

Are we supposed to rest comfortably in the fact that any “mentally ill” person has been “adjudicated” before they can be cast into the fascist, firey pit of government hell? We are subjects of a very corrupt manmade government. Evidently, despite all that the citizen-subjects have been exposed to, especially in recent years, we are going to allow these pagan sodomites make an “adjudicated” decision on who is mentally ill and who is not? Are you serious?

When we have “ensure[d] that the system has all the” names of anyone deemed by Satan himself to be mentally unfit to own or buy a gun, we have successfully hung ourselves and we picked out the rope we want to do it with. How can we be so ignorant and willfully blind?

The Second Amendment is very simple. Men and their fascist government and totalitarian, brainwashed citizens have bastardized the inalienable right and turned it into something it was never intended to be. That’s what men do. Government doesn’t want you or me to have inalienable rights. They want to be the giver of any kind of right in order that they can withdraw it at any time. This act is made that much easier. Organizations like the NSSF do the bidding for the fascists.

As the old saying goes, you can put lipstick on a pig but it’s still a pig. Don’t be fooled by fancy words from lawyers that the new rope that is going to hang you won’t hurt a bit.

Share

Stop the Bus and Let Me Off

Share

House Votes to Reduce Your Inalienable Rights

Yesterday the U.S. House of Representatives voted and passed H.R. 38, by a vote of 231-198. All the usual suspects, i.e. NRA, NSSF, etc., are claiming a great victory. Stupid is as stupid does.

H.R. 38 is commonly known as the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017. What isn’t known by most people is that in order to get the bill to the House floor, it had to contain the “Fix NICS” portion designed, we are told, to improve the criminal background check system.

So what does all of this do?

First, let’s look at the Concealed Carry Reciprocity Act of 2017 (CCRA). Most fail to understand that it should be an unquestioned (inalienable: unquestioned, unable to be taken away) right of any man to defend himself, and yet today’s American society does everything that it can to hand that inalienable right over to the power and control of Government. It makes little sense to me.

With this fact in mind, why is it that Americans are required by Government to be taxed on a piece of paper that grants them a privilege to own or conceal-carry a gun? We must also ask, that if it is an unquestioned right to self-defense, why can’t we cross state lines legally carrying a concealed or any weapon at all?

In addition, ignorants who think they are fighting for Second Amendment rights, are some of the first to stand up and make a lot of noise about state sovereignty. When it fits their narrative, in their minds the states have the right, as found in the Tenth Amendment (The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.) to control their own fates in ways “NOT DELEGATED TO THE UNITED STATES BY THE CONSTITUTION.” And so, by pushing Congress to pass a reciprocity act, they have now delegated the United States to control concealed carry, and the states have now lost some of their sovereignty in deciding how it wants to regulate guns.

With Congress now in control, a group of fascist crooks who would sell their soul to Satan to continue their quest for being pagan sodomites, can alter and take away their GRANTED, which you gave them, privilege with the drop of a hat. LOVING SERVITUDE!

True Second Amendment supporters, not those who think the NRA is their gun rights gOD, would be pushing to make all states “Constitutional Carry,” (poor choice of a label) i.e. man does not need a writ of privilege from any government to protect himself at all times. Which brings us to an interesting part of this new bill.

Some states have always had or recently enacted, laws that strip away the requirement for a permit to carry a gun, concealed or otherwise. With the passage of H.R. 38, where each state is to recognize the piece of paper issued for concealed carry, what does that mean for the constitutional carry person coming and going across state lines?

Read what “qualifies” someone to participate in the Government’s new privilege: “A qualified individual must: (1) be eligible to possess, transport, or receive a firearm under federal law; (2) carry a valid photo identification document; and (3) carry a valid concealed carry permit issued by, or be eligible to carry a concealed firearm in, his or her state of residence.

Constitutional carry assumes a person has a “privilege” to own, receive or transport a gun. There are already laws to deal with that. To qualify, that same person must have a valid photo identification document, a Government instrument, and “carry a valid concealed carry permit” issued in their state. Oops! According to the NRA and others, those who believe in the alienable right to keep and bear arms, just got punished. Whose side is who on anyway?

Seems that Constitutional Carry just got knocked down a peg or six and anyone wishing to be protected when they cross state lines must comply with fascist Big Brother.

So, you ignoramuses keep on turning everything you have over to the control of the Federal Government and soon you’ll have nothing. Follow the corrupt NRA, who is NOT the friend of Second Amendment people. They are the friends of making money and, like Government, will sell you down the river for a buck.

Secondly, it was basically the “Left” who insisted that “Fix NICS” be part of the bill or no deal. Many of the same people who think reciprocity was a good thing, also believe that a background check stops crime. In proclaiming victory, the NRA stated: “All Americans, including law-abiding gun owners, agree that violent criminals should not have legal access to firearms.” These are the same ones who stand and shout that gun laws only harm the lawful citizen, prohibiting them to self-defense, and yet they push something as stupid as a law they now claim will stop criminals.

Any “improvements” to the criminal background check system results in nothing more than more government control, which, it appears, Americans are falling in love with, and a further destruction of a person’s inalienable right to protect and defend themselves at all times.

We’re killing ourselves and loving it!

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Embellishing a Fake Problem With Gun Purchase Background Check System

I wondered how long it would take before idiots would begin placing demands on “improving” the criminal background check system.

Here we go.

First, understand, if you are willing and able, that the Texas church shooting may have been a staged event, part of its purpose to draw attention to background checks…another prohibitive measure for a person to keep and bear arms. The press lies….constantly, and are 100% controlled by the government and other powers who want guns taken out of the hands of every American.

The Texas shooting, we are told, included a “failed” background check that allowed the shooter to illegally purchase a gun because he was a convicted felon.

The calls are going out demanding stricter controls and tighter background checks, even from those fake “conservatives” who lie to you every day, but you refuse to see it.

In a USA Today article, we read: “The FBI’s National Instant Criminal Background Check System (NICS) vets millions of gun purchase transactions every year. But the thousands of gun seizure requests highlight persistent problems in a system where analysts must complete background checks within three days of the proposed purchase. If the background check is not complete within the 72-hour time limit, federal law allows the sale to go forward. ATF agents are asked to take back the guns if the FBI later finds these sales should have been denied. “

In addition supposedly certain “agents” are fearful of having to go out and retrieve guns from some 4,000 gun purchasers where it was later found out a background check failed.

“In addition to the public safety risks, the ATF agents tasked with retrieving the banned weapons from unauthorized gun owners across the country are exposed to potentially dangerous confrontations.”

However, this is not the first time agents have had to go retrieve guns. In addition, the ATF refuses to disclose if there were any problems getting the guns back, which makes an honest person ask if it’s so dangerous why aren’t they telling us all about the shootouts they’ve had getting the guns back? (wink-wink)

“The ATF declined to provide information on the 4,170 gun purchases the FBI referred for seizure last year.”

One way or another, these fascists are determined to get our guns and prevent or limit the sale of guns in any way they can. The hype over the background check system is but one more way to further add restrictions to an already meaningless activity that produces no good results, costs the taxpayers billions of dollars, and restricts the right to keep and bear arms by government force through regulation.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

Maine Governor Advocates for Stricter Gun Control Laws

It appears that Maine Governor Paul LePage has come out with recommendations that the existing laws on the books that severely rip apart our Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms, be strictly enforced and even beefed up. This is a classic example of fake “conservatives” pretending that they know what the term means while advocating for the smothering of individual rights and a destruction of your Second Amendment right.

LePage says that those who commit gun violence, “always have a relationship to either drugs, domestic violence or mental illness.” That may be so, or maybe not. However, drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness affects many aspects of everyone’s lives. If it is so important that these conditions are responsible for gun violence, then what is it that this fascist government is doing about drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness? Our society is nearly 100% dependent on prescription and over-the-counter drugs, pushed heavily through the media to ensure the addictions continue. It is said that mental illness appears more prevalent in our society only because of better detection. Really? Is it really a proper thing that any GI who seeks counseling, perhaps because of war distress, should be considered a mental problem and barred from owning a gun? Who gets to decide what mental disorders are and why they disqualify any individual from owning a gun? I see many in positions to make such decisions loonier than the patients they are condemning.

As a society, we promote violence in our media – movies, and music and just about everything we do in life. And yet, instead of addressing that problem, we think we can cure the domestic violence issue by severely limiting a person’s right to keep and bear arms.

While fake “patriots” pretend that they would never consider infringing on anyone’s right to free speech or freedom of expression (art, music, movies, video games, etc.) they think, evidently as Paul LePage does, that destroying the rights of law-abiding citizens to self-protection is a responsible thing to do; that somehow this will cure the drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness problems.

Fake Second Amendment advocates are the first to claim that taking away rights of law-abiding citizens is wrong, and yet this opinion piece of Governor LePage’s is a clear example of how one right is treated differently than all others. If drugs, domestic violence, and mental illness “always have a relationship” to gun violence, and you advocate for the destruction of the Second Amendment while doing nothing to address the other issues, thinking it’s a cure, you are an ignorant hypocrite.

Each time good-intentioned rights destroyers approach the Second Amendment with advocation of limited rights, the enforcement of the existing laws, and even strengthening the limits on rights, they are promoting gun control and are strong allies with the radical gun control fascists.

For the same reason gun control has no effect on criminals, gun control does nothing to stop drug abuse, mental illness, and domestic violence.

Time to give it a rest and begin strengthening our Second Amendment rights instead of looking for ways to further destroy them.

“The federal government must do a better job to provide adequate resources for background checks on people purchasing firearms.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

When Disarmament is the Goal, Death is the Means

It’s early this morning and I’m going to offer thoughts and information you don’t want to hear. But I don’t care.

If many events that take place in this country are looked at from the perspective that I have carried for many years, that the Powers That Be desire disarmament of the citizen slaves as a necessary part of their overall goals of complete dominance (dictatorial tyranny), and an understanding that man’s life is meaningless to them, perhaps some things might make more sense, albeit savagely evil.

I have stated for many years that the only remaining wall of resistance that protects what is left of our freedoms and liberties is our right to keep and bear arms. It is the one major reason I support that right, plain and simple, without the so-called “reasonable” limits to that right. A right once desirably labeled and recognized as inalienable (unquestioned) is now, not only doled out by man-gods but is vivaciously requested and demanded by a mass of servitude-loving progressives ignorantly eager to be the next victims of the quest, at any cost, for disarmament.

Anyone who cares enough to seek Truth, understands that the Hegelian Dialectic is in full employment. These “dialectical stages of development” consist of thesis, reaction, antithesis. Or, better explained this way: A crisis is created; the creator of that crisis seeks and promotes a reaction from the masses, that is those whose life more resembles what was described by the Romans during the First Century as Bread and Circuses, to keep the masses happy; this is followed by a solution – a solution which was what was sought from the very beginning (disarmament).

Knowing that the Powers seek disarmament, knowing that the Powers do not value your life or mine, knowing that the Powers believe fully in the ends justifying the means, your and my life is certainly considered expendable. There is no other way to look at this.

Over the weekend there was another staged mass murder. Of course the weapon of choice was a gun or guns and right on cue the puppet regime of the Ruling Establishment began their systematic chants for disarmament. Watching these events over the years, which seem to closely follow someone’s written script, I am left with no other thought than that these are staged, i.e. they are the thesis. Immediately following the event emotional embellishment is promoted, both by the Powers and by the ignorant puppets, or useful idiots (reaction), pushed by the Media. The solution, although immediately demanded by politicians and others, has not yet come. The push back is still strong enough to hold them off for now. This will not last forever because there are too many people brainwashed into the belief that “reasonable” gun control laws are necessary. Perhaps the question might be, necessary for what?

The majority of mass murders in this country are staged. People do not want to hear nor even consider this idea, nor are they willing to admit the country, the government they love, the one they salute, that they pledge allegiance to, the same one they are willing to fight and die for, is so corrupt, or corrupted by the Powers that Be, that they would be the creators of such heinous acts as marching into a church and gunning down a group of people. And this is why it continues and is so successful. Keep thinking that way and for certain the mass shootings will continue.

Recently I made commentary on the mass murder in Las Vegas, referring to Stephen P. Halbrook’s theory of “Benignity and Progressive” in referring to the proposal and passage of gun restriction bills. I wrote: “Through all of this, bear in mind that in order for benignity to remain and progress, each successive crisis must be bigger and greater than the last. The servitude become desensitized with each event, thus forcing the perpetrators to increase the effect.”

In order for the Hegelian Dialectic to remain effective, each successive staged event must be somehow greater and/or hit closer to home. As strange as it might sound, there is something a bit distant in one’s mind when considering a mass murder in the city of sin of Las Vegas, at an event the overwhelming majority of Americas, would not and could not attend. But stage such an event in a church in a sleepy Texas town of less than 400 people and it begins to hit close to home. There’s a good possibility that the majority of attendees to that church support the Second Amendment. That’s hitting close to home and kicking a bit below the belt.

We have seen efforts for disarmament backfire, which is still a good thing. So long as there remains those who ardently fight against the emotional clap-trap always associated with violent crime, the process of disarmament is slowed. Not only do those who push back against disarmament need to keep up the fight, but they need to stop playing into the arms of the disarming fascists and cease with watering down the Second Amendment. No other right is attacked and diluted like the Second Amendment. Why do we put up with it?

Remember, “We wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, and against the worldly governors, the princes of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness, which are in the high places.” Ephesians 6:12

Your government and the Powers that Be are corrupt to the very core. It is time for you to begin to recognize that. Man’s creations can be nothing other than evil and corrupt. God told us this was so. He told us not to be a part of it. He told us to “Come out of her” (Mystery Babylon).

Let’s stop enabling and perpetuating the Evil.

Share

Gun Banning: Been Tried Before

Share

Maine House strongly endorses new effort to arm forest rangers

*Editor’s Note* – If there actually existed a Second Amendment and/or the God-given right to defend and/or protect oneself and your property, this wouldn’t even be an issue to discuss or to find ways to fund. Instead of creating another of this country’s band of “Heroes,” every person, whether a forest ranger or a pig farmer, should have the right to choose whether they want to carry a weapon for protection.

“Rep. Lois Reckitt, D-South Portland, said she rarely votes for any bill that supports increasing access to guns, but she voted for this one.

“I am standing up for these folks who in my mind are another segment of the law enforcement community in Maine,” she said.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

Suspended Black Conservative Columnist Speaks Out About Why She Quit St. Louis Post-Dispatch

*Editor’s Note* – Earlier today I posted President Donald Trump’s FAKE Executive Order  that he presented as “policy” of his administration to protect the right of free speech and freedom of religion. In my editorial note included with that post, I wrote of how there was no such thing as freedom of speech and that the Executive Order of Trump’s was nothing more that a further guarantee of the Government’s authority to control every aspect of your life.

The erosion of freedom of speech is further substantiated in the information contained in the press release that follows of one person being “suspended” from a news media company after writing an article about the Second Amendment.

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

“It’s Never Been a Secret That I Support the Second Amendment and the National Rifle Association”

St. Louis, MO / Washington, DC – Project 21 Co-Chairman Stacy Washington , a black conservative, was recently suspended by the St. Louis Post-Dispatch after writing a column defending gun ownership.  She is now speaking out and available for interviews about the allegations made against her by the newspaper’s management and her decision to end writing for the Post-Dispatch altogether.

Washington was recently selected to help guide Project 21, a leadership network promoting the diversity of political opinion within the black community in America, as one of its co-chairmen.

A freelance contributor who began writing a column for the Post-Dispatch last November, Washington was suspended by the newspaper on April 28 after writing a column on guns that her editor complained did not mention her past affiliation with the National Rifle Association (NRA).  While she has worked with the NRA on media programs and projects in the past, she says she was never paid for her services and the opinions in the column were her own.

Washington’s support of gun ownership has never been a secret.  In her first column for the newspaper, she wrote: “With my father on active [military] duty, guns were always a part of life, so I considered the Second Amendment second in importance only to the religious protections afforded to us in the Constitution.” Before becoming a columnist, the Post-Dispatch reported on her work with the NRA. She also said the column in question –  “Guns and the Media” – was reviewed by the newspaper’s staff before publication.  That column criticized other Missouri newspapers that recently featured commentaries speculating that gun owners favored guns over child safety and asked readers to compare the NRA to the ISIS terrorism network.  In her column, she wrote: “Gun ownership in America is a right that is enshrined in the Constitution, and owning a gun has no bearing on whether people love their children.”

 Commenting on leaving the Post-Dispatch, Washington said:

It’s never been a secret that I support the Second Amendment and the National Rifle Association. To effectively be suspended by a newspaper for that seems beyond comprehension. But that’s what I believe happened to me.

Last week, my final column for the St. Louis Post-Dispatch – “Guns and the Media” – discussed two anti-gun opinion columns in other Missouri papers. I think these commentaries were allowed to falsely accuse gun owners of prioritizing guns over child safety and tried to make the NRA and ISIS morally equivalent. I suggested such radical allegations were allowed to be published without challenge due to an editorial bias against guns.

Like all of my columns published by the newspaper, it was submitted, accepted, edited and approved by the staff of the Post-Dispatch. As a freelance writer, I was unable to post my work directly to their website. So I was obviously surprised when I was notified of a suspension that readers were told was due to my “ active promotional activities and professional association with the National Rifle Association, [which] represented an unacceptable conflict of interest.”

 I am not, nor have I ever been, an employee of the NRA. I was not compensated for my participation in an NRA documentary that was released last year nor was I paid for any appearances on NRA-affiliated media over the years. Some of this work was even previously reported on by the Post-Dispatch. There was never any attempt at deception.

 After much consideration, I have decided to terminate my relationship with the St. Louis Post-Dispatch. When I began writing for the paper, it was with the belief that I would be able to present my opinions from a conservative perspective without interference. This has not been the case, and it makes any future relationship with the newspaper untenable.

 I stand by what I wrote, and it represents me and no other person or organization. I believe that, even in a commentary, it is irresponsible and proves an inherent bias when newspapers permit the comparison of NRA members to Islamic State terrorists and imply that gun-owning Americans cherish their firearms more than the safety of their children.

 To book an interview with Stacy Washington, contact Judy Kent at (703) 759-7476.

Project 21 members have been quoted, interviewed or published over 40,000 times since the program was created in 1992. Project 21 is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research. Contributions to the National Center are tax-deductible and greatly appreciated, and may be earmarked exclusively for the use of Project 21.

Founded in 1982, the National Center for Public Policy Research is a non-partisan, free-market, independent conservative think-tank. Ninety-four percent of its support comes from some 60,000 individuals, less than four percent from foundations and less than two percent from corporations. Sign up for email updates here. Follow us on Twitter at @NationalCenter for general announcements. To be alerted to upcoming media appearances by National Center staff, follow our media appearances Twitter account at @NCPPRMedia.

Share

A Precursor To “Permit-to-Purchase” Gun Bill Withdrawn

It has been brought to my attention that at least one member of the Maine House of Representatives, is stating that LD 1154 proposal has been withdrawn from further debate.

LD 1154 would have required that on either a Maine driver’s license or an official Maine identification card, information would be included as proof that an individual meets certain qualifications in order that they can legal purchase a firearm.

Share