April 28, 2017

A Precursor To “Permit-to-Purchase” Gun Bill Withdrawn

It has been brought to my attention that at least one member of the Maine House of Representatives, is stating that LD 1154 proposal has been withdrawn from further debate.

LD 1154 would have required that on either a Maine driver’s license or an official Maine identification card, information would be included as proof that an individual meets certain qualifications in order that they can legal purchase a firearm.

Maine Sportsman’s Alliance Second Amendment Banquet

Easy To Understand Math

How Lives Could Have Been Saved

If the attack at the Fort Lauderdale/Hollywood actually happened as we are being told, think of the number of lives that could have been saved if lawful citizens were allowed to carry for protection. As soon as this mind altered man opened fire, a legally armed man would have gunned him down.

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Someone asked me once, knowing that I support a person’s right to protection, what I was afraid of. My answer was simple. I’m not afraid of anything. But I would like the choice, that if I was in an airport and some deranged person pulled a gun from his baggage and began shooting, I could protect myself, my family, others around me and, if necessary, kill the son-of-a-bitch who’s killing people.

Gun Deregulation: Quote of the Day

*Editor’s Comment* – Is this an emerging trend, set off by the perception of voters who believe they elected Donald Trump as the new president? This may be a first, at least from what I have heard and read for over a decade – a leader of a gun rights organization actually calling for “broad deregulation.”

Has the sissified trend toward compromise and “reasonable” restrictions to the Second Amendment, been temporarily suspended, due to the perception of a pro Second Amendment president – who by the way strongly supported Bill Clinton’s assault weapons ban?

Pssst! But Don’t Go Look!

“We want broad deregulation of firearms,” said Dudley Brown, the president of the National Association for Gun Rights. “It’s high time Republican majorities in the executive and legislative branches come in and make some broad, broad changes. As the saying goes, ‘Dance with the ones who brung ya.’”<<<Read More>>>

Pie In The Sky Restoration of Rights

*Editor’s Note* – The below commentary is pie in the sky nonsense based on a false belief that the rulers of the United States Corporate Administration are chosen by the people to apply the Constitution and Bill of Rights to the servitude. To play within a false and rigged system, believing you can change the false and rigged system is an act of futility and a display of the lack of understanding of history and the application of laws and rights. There is too much (money) at stake that the Ruling Establishment would actually allow a “Wyatt Earp” into the White House. To believe that Donald Trump is going to end Progressivism is a mirror image of 2008, when an equal number of American citizen servants believed “Hope n Change” would end Conservatism. Nothing changes but perception.

While the author of the linked-to commentary suggests some ways to ensure the continuation of our Second Amendment rights, he fails to reveal his “reasonable” gun control necessities – of which I am most confident he, like most fake Second Amendment advocates, has a laundry list.

If Trump were going to be one to govern outside the Establishment ways, he would be talking about God-given rights and protecting them and not seeking the power of government to change government. That has never worked and never will. It’s all just pie in the sky.

“To do so, we enact national reciprocity; we remove the burdens placed on law-abiding citizens and we destroy the false notion of “gun free zones.” As in the economic examples above, a free people will flourish, crime will reduce even further than it has, and the desire for a government to enact more “gun control’s” will perish in the face of freedom thereby relinquishing the enemies of our rights to the ashbin of history with the rest of progressive America.”<<<Read More>>>

Fighting Against Destruction of Rights While Promoting Destruction of Rights Makes Little Sense

While I support anyone who will work to protect a person’s God-given right to self protection and the right to choose how one should be able to protect themselves, I cannot, with a straight face, allow for the concession of a right to keep and bear arms while fighting against an absurd, fascist attempt to rid the state of Maine and others from gun ownership.

Question 3 isn’t about so-called (fake) universal background checks before a gun can be purchased, swapped or loaned. It’s about gun registry, as are background checks of any kind. Once guns are registered, the fascist government (the United States) will know how many and of what kinds of guns you own when they come to confiscate them. If you understand that principle, then simply supporting a background check – the only ones who get them are law-abiding citizen-subjects – is advocating for the destruction of a person’s right to protect themselves and their choice to do so. If you do not understand this principle, then you are one of the blinded who think “reasonable” prohibitions to the Second Amendment are necessary and proper, and while appearing to be a supporter of such a right, in reality, you are a contributor to its destruction, and ultimately, of yourself.

An example of this is found in articles published in Maine newspapers. I applaud the Sportsman’s Alliance of Maine’s executive director, David Trahan, for his relentless work in trying to ward off a fascist billionaire, ordered by his bosses to come to Maine and stir up as much havoc as can possibly be done in order to pit people against each other, while at the same time, attempting to destroy the Second Amendment.  However…..

I see things a bit differently. Make no mistake, I vehemently oppose Michael Bloomberg’s effort. I also vehemently oppose gun registries of any kind. The requirement of a background check, even though we are lied to that the information used in a Federal Background Check is not retained for further use, is nothing more than a gun registry.

The Bangor Daily News carries an opinion piece from David Trahan. Trahan is not the only one fighting against Question 3 that indicates they would support background checks for private gun sales in Maine. Trahan writes: “The reason we strongly oppose Question 3 is because it includes firearm “transfers” as well as sales.” Let’s not kid ourselves. What this statement means is that if Bloomberg’s Question 3 did not included background checks on “transfers” they would support it. That is unfortunate.

The limitations and destruction of any and all rights, inalienable or government granted, all come from concession and compromise. Fascists like Michael Bloomberg, and the totalitarians that follow him, want to be the dictators of what, if any, rights and privileges people have. One reason they continue in their onslaught of human rights is because they know that with each proposal they gain something because the opposition thinks offering up a concession or a compromise will appease the lion and that the lion will go away – only until such time that it is hungry again. That’s how it works and that is how promoting such behavior at any level is supporting your own self destruction. It makes little sense.

Maine needs to stop Question 3. However, if that should happen, the lion will return again because, if nothing else, it has learned that they can easily win another limit, a regulation, with a person’s loss of right to buy and sell a firearm but not a transfer….this time.

Which will come first? The loss of the right to loan a gun to a friend, or the right to keep and bear arms. At some point, this continued ceding of inalienable rights will end in the all out prohibition of anyone’s right to keep and bear arms…well, except the fascists who make the laws and force them onto everyone else but themselves.

Oppose Question 3, but oppose all efforts to limit your right. It’s what works.

Maine Law Enforcement are OVERWHELMINGLY opposed to Question 3

sammapquestion3

What You Are Taught to be Afraid Of

But Don’t Go Look!

gunonhip

Brady Campaign’s Lies About Toddlers and Guns, and Hillary Says “Heller” Was About Toddlers

Do you recall the Humphrey Bogart movie, Casablanca? In that movie is a scene in which German soldiers demand that Rick’s Cafe be closed down. In Rick’s, in a back room, gambling takes place. Rick makes sure that the head of the prefecture gets his share of gambling money.

During the scene in which the prefect, played by Claude Rains, blows his whistle and declares the bar will be closed until further notice, gets handed his gambling payoff and says, “Shocked! I’m shocked to find gambling taking place in this establishment.”

Some might be shocked but those of us with a smidgen of knowledge understand that totalitarian groups, such as the Brady Campaign Against Gun Violence, lie, cheat and steal to get what they want. It certainly helps that they are supported by the U.S. Government to carry out their fascist agenda (did I ever tell you that historically fascism is the tool to achieve communism?).

It appears that in a brand new anti gun campaign launched by the puppets of the fascists, they use gun data of adults and claim it pertains to the number of “toddlers” killed or injured due to gun violence.

SHOCKED! SHOCKED I TELL YOU!

Meanwhile, the insane, cheating, lying, corrupt, murdering, sub-human Hillary tells people that the Heller v. District of Columbia Supreme Court case and ruling was about protecting “toddlers” from gun violence and that is why she says Heller should be overturned.