November 20, 2019

Trump’s “True” Colors Shining Through

There are lyrics to a song that begin this way: “I see your true colors shining through…” True Colors can be good or bad. It appears that we are now beginning to see the “true” colors of Donald Trump and many other “FAKE” Second Amendment supporters according to their anti Second Amendment actions following the staged school shooting in Parkland, Florida.

Back in June of 2015, I posted on this website, and took an immense amount of grief from idiotic, blinded, and as a result, fake Second Amendment clowns, that Donald Trump supported a ban on “assault weapons” and that he supported longer waiting periods in which to purchase a gun. Of course, his political game, like a chameleon, changed its colors to become anything necessary to get elected. This is nothing new by politicians because every last one of them is a filthy, rotten, corrupt son-of-a-bitch.

In that posting, I provided a quote by Trump: “I generally oppose gun control, but I support the ban on assault weapons and I support a slightly longer waiting period to purchase a gun. With today’s Internet technology we should be able to tell within 72-hours if a potential gun owner has a record.”

From my perspective, the insanity that has followed the Parkland, Florida shooting is not about how to make the world we live in safer. It’s about mindlessly duped millions of people doing the bidding for corrupt bastards bent on complete control over everything we do. The brainwashing that has gone on for many years now has rendered a mass of automatonic sheep eager to cut their own throats because they no longer have the ability to think cognitively. It’s the epitome of cognitive dissonance, and what makes this brand of cognitive dissonance so effective for the Global Power Structure that promotes it, is that while they stick bamboo shoots under their fingernails and stand in white-hot coals of fire, they are thoughtless and unaware of what they do, feeling no pain.

But why the guns? Is there any other item that exists in our world that excites such idiotic, emotional behavior that doesn’t involve animals? I don’t think so.

What boils my blood is to watch these people act and react. Essentially, I have stopped watching, reading, and listening to mainstream media. Most of us know it is horseshit but due to our ongoing mind control, we simply continue watching it anyway. It’s some kind of perverse addiction. I stopped because I finally realized how angry it makes me – not the content of lies being heaped upon the masses (mostly because I recognize the lies while most don’t) but because people believe it and react accordingly. That is all part of the plan.

This morning I sat down on the living room sofa and turned on the local news. I actually wanted to catch a weather report because it has been so warm here. Because it is a Florida television station, it was a vibrant display of panic, emotionalism, idiocy, blather, poppycock, and everything that turns your stomach causing uncontrolled wretching. I could, but I couldn’t, believe what I was hearing about a school shooting, guns and the need to do something. As one member of the zombies stated, “We have to do SOMETHING!”

It angers me that people actually believe that banning a special kind of gun, any gun or all guns will stop violence and crime. What an incredible job the propagandists have done! This failure to launch brains is not relegated only to the mentally deranged “Left.” It is shared by most all, but due to the “Right’s” higher ground attitude, and a false belief and understanding that “reasonable” restrictions on a person’s God-given right to choose how best to protect themselves from not only some programmed, deranged, subhuman, troglodyte shooting up a school full of children but just as much from the damned evil bastards operating out of Washington, D.C., that we see a continued “reasonable” assassination of my God-given right to decide for myself how I will protect myself, my property and my family.

But, why the guns? Banning guns won’t stop violent crime from occurring. We have made strict laws to ban illicit drugs and the sale of them. It has done nothing to stop the use of people-killing drugs. The Federal Government declared a “war on drugs.” Has that stopped the use of drugs and the tens of thousands of useless deaths directly and indirectly related to drugs? No! We have made laws that a person can’t use a vehicle to murder people, run them over in a crowd. Has any of that stopped the action? No! We have made it a crime to drive drunk and declare it vehicular manslaughter when a drunk causes another’s death. Has that stopped drunk driving? But, somehow the servitude is trained to believe guns are different in basic human psychology.

I could go on and on but for those beyond hope, nothing I say will get them to understand the ignorance and their lack of thinking. They have been programmed to be this way. We must attack the guns. We must always attack the guns. Sense and sensibility be damned!!! Attack the guns and thusly my right to choose.

Brainwashed, sheep cannot and will not see how political this all is for a purpose far bigger than protecting children in a gun free zone. They won’t address the real problem because it points a finger directly at themselves.

The cries go out to “ban assault weapons” and yet if you ask them what an assault weapon is none could tell you. Why? Because even the lawmakers don’t know. It was designed that way. To some, an “assault weapon” could be a wet noodle. To others, it’s an intercontinental ballistic missile loaded with a nuclear warhead. Not defining what an assault weapon is, provides leeway for criminals in Washington to do as they please, when they please, and how they please. It is how our laws are deliberately written. It’s part of the rigged system.

Here’s an example of such. President Trump is someone most Trump supporters believe is a staunch advocate for the Second Amendment. I have written recently and showed examples of how so-called gun rights advocates think that because Donald Trump is president, gun sales have dropped and people think the threat to disarmament no longer exists.

Trump is not a good advocate of the Second Amendment. The NRA is not a good advocate of the Second Amendment. Most outdoor sportsmen are not good advocates for the Second Amendment.

Are we to believe that Trump so much cares that innocent people are getting shot by deranged people his answer is to send out a “memorandum” and instructs his Attorney General to seek a ban on “assault-type weapons” and a clearer definition of “machinegun?”

But, I thought Trump, the NRA, all the other fake Second Amendment groups, along with sportsmen, substantiate their belief in the right to keep and bear arms by telling the world it’s not the guns that are killing people. If they believe that why do they persist in giving that right of choice away? Why then don’t the go after the real problem? I know why, but do you?

Proverbs 29:18 reads: “Where there is no vision, the people decay…” (some use the word perish instead of decay). I think one can expound on that just a bit without changing the meaning and clarify that if there is the wrong vision, the people will perish too.

Some choose to believe this is the greatest country on earth. Perhaps, but one has to wonder if that belief wouldn’t be dashed a bit if the many masses actually knew the truth of things.

There have been ample opportunities for the right leader to step forward and lead while providing the people the right vision. I understand that because he is nothing more than a puppet, a president cannot lead in the right way and live. The problem, as we have seen in Parkland, Florida isn’t because somebody has failed to define what a machine gun is. It’s because the vision for this country is wrong. Trump has had a chance. Obama had his chances. Bush many times could have worked to right the vision. It goes on and on.

Changing the Second Amendment, limiting my right to choose, any of man’s laws will not change anything. The vision must include addressing the problems of an immoral society, driven by lust, greed, hatred, anger, fear, etc. Our leaders exemplify the wrong vision. The people want so badly to follow, they will do exactly that. The leaders have the wrong vision and it matters not because the people will always follow.

Trump has an opportunity to use his position to begin to address the real problem. But he won’t. He can’t. Instead, with the help of mindless automatons, he will work with those who will diminish my legal rights to self-defense and their work will make the world a more dangerous place to live. Anyone who speaks only of addressing guns and not our decayed society is part of the problem.

People like Trump and those that make the laws that keep us in our places, get to have all the protection their filthy money can buy. And you cannot see how wrong all of this is.

I’m sorry!

Edited on 2/21/2018 at 6:04 p.m.

Share

Give Up Second Amendment in Exchange for an “Upgrade” of the First?

You can’t make this stuff up.

I was sent a link to an article at Powerline, where the author made a valiant attempt to inject some semblance of rational discourse into a topic that never experiences anything close to rationality – school shootings.

To prove this point, simply read the comments that follow the article. I’d like to take a moment and address one of them. A commenter writes: “I suggest a trade-off: Conservatives support the deletion of the 2nd amendment in return for an upgraded 1st amendment which restores prayer and Bible reading in the public schools, and makes the graphic depiction of murder on TV, film, the Internet and video games illegal.”

I immediately wondered what world this person must live in. I know where I live and it’s seldom in and of this world but I think my reasoning skills are a tad bit better. Let me explain, even though our existence has driven us to a point where an explanation is actually needed.

This person suggests that “conservatives” support the deletion of the Second Amendment as part of a trade-off. I’m wondering why liberals, who have and will continue to enjoy their Second Amendment right aren’t included in this obvious ignorant attack? I guess I just didn’t know only “conservatives” support the Second Amendment.

Try, if possible, to understand the trade-off. Before I comment further, I hope that it is obvious that this person fails miserably in understanding the First and Second Amendments or even holding any discernment as to the difference between a God-given right, a Government-given privilege, and the freedom to make choices according to your morals and/or ideology.

The commenter suggests an “upgrade” to the First Amendment in exchange for a repeal of the Second Amendment. It is unbelievable, to the unlearned I suppose, that a person views a reduction in their rights as an upgrade. Once upon a time a right, in the context of the Bill of Rights, was constructed with the idea that a person was free to exercise that right while at the same time not infringing on the choices of others in exercising any right or choosing not to. The comment above surely delineates a lost understanding of something so basic.

For those in need, here is the First Amendment as it is written: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.”

The “upgrade” is said to include: “…restores prayer and Bible reading in the public schools, and makes the graphic depiction of murder on TV, film, the Internet and video games illegal.”

For clarification, we the people and We The People, have butchered the First Amendment but not nearly to the extent of the Second. However, people mostly have the right to pray or read the Bible any place and at any time they so CHOOSE. I have yet to find written in the Bible where Yahweh says that prayer must be done openly in a public arena, in a formal and structurally organized way and included in the curriculum of public schools. In other words, because Government dictates that praying and Bible reading are not part of the public school curriculum, any student, for the most part, and while not disturbing others in their quest for an education, can pray or read their Bible if they so CHOOSE. I’ve never understood those that think they are denied their “right” to their established “religion” because prayer and Bible reading are not “REQUIRED.”

As much as what movies, music, video games, Internet, and all is a reflection of the decadent and immoral American society as a whole, last time I checked, a parent has a right to control what their children are allowed to see and listen to. Parents fail miserably in this but is that a good enough reason to pretend that making this crap illegal, in other words destroying another right of a person to CHOOSE, the right answer? Is that why the person called this an “upgrade.” Up is down, down is up…etc.

Supposedly, once we become “of age” we can CHOOSE to see and hear what we wish. As the Scriptures say: Bring up a child in the way in which he/she should go and he/she shall never depart from it. As much as some would desire, it is still quite difficult to control what a person thinks…short of lobotimization.

I would suppose that in this person’s mind, their “upgrade” was some kind of carrot at the end of a stick. It doesn’t work that way. Rights are about CHOICE not about being forced to have to abide by someone’s ideology, including governments’.

The Second Amendment doesn’t force people to pick up a gun and use it. The Second Amendment is about giving any lawful citizen of this country the option to do that if they CHOOSE. If I believe that Government is a serious threat to my existence, as well as my freedom to make choices, anyone mandating to me that the only gun I can own is a single shot .22 caliber rifle, isn’t allowing me full exercise of my right to self defense and/or the threat of tyranny.

What another commenter said was that there would be no First Amendment if the Second Amendment (or the principle on which it was founded) did not exist.

What man-governments have done to the Second Amendment, masked behind comments like, “reasonable controls,” is to continue to limit and restrict the choices of people in how they can defend themselves. Gun Free Zones outlaw freedom of choice. People who get shot and killed in a Gun Free Zone are the responsibility of every government and individual who demands and has been successful in taking away my freedom to choose how and where I can defend myself. Someday, you will have to answer for your totalitarian behavior, but for now, you will have to live with the reality of what you have done. There is blood on your hands.

Sleep well tonight, my pretty!

Share

Gun Control That Works

Share

NJ Man [Exit 29] who Shoots 3 Problem Bears gets $4,000+ Fines and Fees

In October, 2014, a 76-year-old New Jersey resident shot three problem bears on his property.  One was an adult sow that was on his deck and looking in through his sliding glass door.  The location of the two juvenile bears when they were shot, is disputed, but was either on the deck or close to it.  Bears are more dangerous as they are larding up for the winter hibernation.

Bears that display this level of familiarity with humans, who associate humans with food, are a severe problems waiting to happen.  It is why the conservation community has come up with a well used phrase: A fed bear is a dead bear.

Source: NJ Man who Shoots 3 Problem Bears gets $4,000+ Fines and Fees

BearMoose

Share

If You Threaten Me I’ll Whine for More Laws

GunControlWhine

Share

The Self-Defense Ad the NFL Refuses to Air During Super Bowl

VIDEO: I suppose the NFL has the right, as a private entity, to set the standards for what they will allow to air as advertisements during events like the Super Bowl. What we should be looking at here is whether or not the NFL is consistent in their denial of ads and the reasons for them. By law, the NFL cannot discriminate against one company or companies of the same kind. Is that what’s going on here? Leave your thoughts and comments below in the comments section.

Share

Concealed Carry: Keep Criminals Guessing

PHOTO

keepcriminalsguessing

Share

Do You Carry an AK-74 When You Go Hiking…….in Alaska?

Share

Government’s Job is to Protect Our Rights

And I will protect MYSELF!

Share

And Our Government Is Talking About More Restrictions on Guns?

American citizens should have been awakened to many realities during and after the events that have occurred over the past few days in the city of Boston and surrounding towns. What we know presently is that two men, one age 26 and one 19, plotted to blow up people and property along the route being run by the participants in the Boston Marathon. They succeeded.

One terrorist is now dead and the other captured last evening around 9 p.m. Now authorities will begin the process of telling us all the whys and wherefores of this tragic event.

It is ironic that this event happened at a time when the Obama Administration and several anti gun and anti rights groups and individuals are doing all they can to limit access to and in some cases to ban guns from the American people. They believe they have the authority to limit each of us in the implementation of the tools necessary to defend ourselves from all forms of threats.

Sandy Hook has been argued by some that had there been armed people in the school, perhaps the entire debacle would never have happened. The truth is that people have a right to defend themselves. During the manhunt for the two suspects in the Boston bombings, thousands of residents within the immediate area of the search were put at great risk by these two men. For some, all of those people whose lives were at risk, should not be able to possess a gun or the type of gun that would be best to protect themselves and their families from such terror.

While it is easy to blurt out rhetoric about how guns kill, it isn’t until events like Boston hit close enough to home, that we begin questioning the motives and the reasoning behind anyone wanting to go the extra step to put people at greater risk. It makes no sense.

Listening to the media and the so-called “experts” over the past few days, many of them, in their quest to perpetuate the “moral panic”, as it has been called, stated that what we saw in Boston is the new normal. Horrible Geraldo Rivera on television last night raved on about how “home grown” terrorism, as he wanted to label the two Boston terrorists, is what Americans can and should expect in our future.

If this is true, should we then be disarming the American people?

sharethoughts

Share