December 13, 2019

Corrupt Congress: To “Ensure a Right is Not Unlimited”

On Sunday, (yesterday) I posted a link to a proposed “Assault Weapons” bill, a link that had previously been left on this web site by a reader and contributor. I quietly waited to see if any readers would respond to the “preamble” to the bill, stated as follows: “To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.”

It appears nobody read it or, paid it no mind. Consider the words. Here we have a large group of Congressmen (I didn’t count, but well over 100) who are either so blatantly ignorant or are following in the footsteps of ALL OTHER, wrongly-elected government officials who must consider the constitution a piece of camel dung, worthy only for wiping their rear ends with, of course, at the expense of all Americans’ liberties.

There once was a day when at least some of the belly-crawling reptiles, who cheated their way into a lap of luxury and utter corruption in Washington, considered it their elected duty to UPHOLD – confirm or support; maintain a constitutional right – the rights of citizens. It was their sworn duty to uphold the Constitution. Included in that responsibility should have been the protection of the process that would assure that no constitutional right was amended or gotten rid of without due process. It must be shown, through debate, that any bill proposal DOES NOT contradict the liberties of the Constitution/Bill of Rights. When’s the last time that happened?

In Bill H.R. 4269, the evil lords of their own minds, boldly and tyrannically state that their bill should exist for the purpose of ensuring that the Second Amendment is NOT UNLIMITED!

Well, bravo for the corrupt bastards!

It is now clearly spelled out for all to see that their purpose in Washington is to make sure that no American has any RIGHT, written and sworn to in the United States Constitution and Bill of Rights.

If I have to spell it out for you, I will. This means no right given to any person by any MAN, for any reason, under any document, is worth the used portion of a roll of toilet paper. You want to continue to elect these thieving criminals you go right ahead. I stopped the farce several years ago.

Throw all the damned “rascals” out! The problem is they will be replaced by the same bunch of contaminated pond suckers.

 

Share

H.R. 4269 To Ban Hundreds of Guns

A BILL

To regulate assault weapons, to ensure that the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2015”.<<<Entire Tyrannical Bill Proposal>>>

Share

Excuses Are Like………

This reminds me of the old story (I’ve used it countless times) of the guy who goes to his neighbor and asks to borrow his ax. The man says, “No, it’s Tuesday.”

The neighbor asks why Tuesday was important, to which the man replied, “If I don’t want you to borrow my ax, I guess one excuse is as good as another.”

The government wants to ban guns. I guess one excuse is as good as any to do that. This excuse is a bit more relevant when you consider that perhaps in their creation of fake “terror” attacks on the U.S., not only will they continue to instill fear in the populace but they can double-down on that fear and use it as an excuse to ban guns. Might I remind you why the government wants you to NOT have guns? It’s a threat to their tyrannical rule.

ISISContained

Share

Wolves Up Yours: Why USFWS (U.S. Government) Is Fascist

We learned yesterday that the Department of Interior (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) was going to release mongrel, semi-wild dogs onto National Forest land in New Mexico even though the State of New Mexico has denied the fascists permits to do so.

I took the liberty to embolden part of the original letter sent to Director Sandoval from the Department of Interior that states that New Mexico has not responded to permit requests “FAVORABLY,” in other words, the Government didn’t get their cake and eat it too.

When laws are written and forced upon the American people without their knowledge, that is wrong. Why do we have laws? Our own government either ignores those laws or simply craft new laws, by cover of darkness, to circumvent existing laws in order to run roughshod over the people. Why do we have an Endangered Species Act? The Act, like all laws written pertaining to the Department of Interior, including the Endangered Species Act, were deliberately crafted in a way that gives the director dictatorial power to do just about anything he/she damned will pleases. Yes, it’s a rigged system.

In this specific case, the letter sent to Director Sandoval, invokes rule 43CFR 24.4(i)(5)(i), which lists those circumstances in which the Service can ignore rules and regulations as they pertain to cooperation with states – (5) Consult with the States and comply with State permit requirements in connection with the activities listed below, except in instances where the Secretary of the Interior determines that such compliance would prevent him from carrying out his statutory responsibilities:(emphasis added)

(i) In carrying out research programs involving the taking or possession of fish and wildlife or programs involving reintroduction of fish and wildlife;

I might ask how many readers participated in the drafting and passage of 43CFR 24.4? I thought so. How many had knowledge of this “exemption?” I thought so. How many, who did have knowledge of this exemption, understood its real meaning? I thought so. How many of you will turn right around and go vote for the same fascists that will go to Washington and do the same thing? I thought so. How many of you like living under fascist rule, headed toward totalitarian socialism? I thought so.

Now maybe the question comes back to who actually has the ultimate authority in this instance. Once, we thought that the Constitution, particularly the Tenth Amendment, provided the sovereignty to the states in order to limit the power and overreach of the the Federal Government, i.e. Tyranny. We know this is a useless amendment, as are most all the rest.

What should New Mexico do? Yesterday, with tongue in cheek, sort of, I suggested that the State of New Mexico should notify the Department of Interior that all wolves released in that state without proper permits, would be killed.

If we are going to live in a lawless land, within a rigged system, should we give the fascists a taste of their own?

As is always the case, the Federal Government will get its way and the people will lose. Very little of anything that the Feds have done, as it pertains to wolf introduction nationwide, has been legal. Evidently that doesn’t matter. The Government makes their own rules, plays by their own rules and if they don’t have a rabbit to pull out of their hat, i.e. 43CFR 24.4 then they simply disregard laws and claim a new interpretation. Haven’t we seen this before of late?

So what’s the use?

End of RANT!

The original letter sent to Director Sandoval from the Department of the Interior.

“In 2015, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service) applied for permits from the New Mexico Department of Game and Fish (Department) to import Mexican wolves into the state and release Mexican wolves onto National Forest Service lands in New Mexico. The Department has not responded favorably to our permit requests, delaying determination or denying our import permit requests and denying our applications to release Mexican wolves onto National Forest Service lands in New Mexico. On September 29, 2015, in response to the Service’s appeal of the Director’s denial of release permits, the New Mexico State Game Commission, upheld the Director’s decision.”(emphasis added) <<<Read More>>>

Share

Black Conservatives React to U.S. Supreme Court Decision

Press Release from the National Center for Public Policy Research:

Black Conservatives React to U.S. Supreme Court Decision for Use of “Disparate Impact” in Administration of Fair Housing Act

WASHINGTON, DC — Legal and policy experts with the Project 21 black leadership network are available for comment on today’s U.S. Supreme Court decision that allows perceived group racial disparities to be used as a trigger for enforcement of the Fair Housing Act.

“When those statistical differences alone are used as proof of discrimination, freedom and liberty are lost; but worse the constitutional protections provided to every American as an individual are lost too,” said Project 21 co-chairman Horace Cooper, a legal commentator who taught constitutional law at George Mason University and is a former leadership staff member for the U.S. House of Representatives.

“It’s a shame that the majority of justices are willing to allow allegations of discrimination in housing to be painted using a broad brush — sometimes by those who may not even be among the aggrieved — rather than finding and cutting out true instances of abuse with scalpel-like precision,” said Archbishop Council Nedd II, Ph.D., author of multiple books and rector of St. Alban’s Anglican Church in Pine Grove Mills, PA. “The Fair Housing Act was meant to be a scalpel, but the Court has now decided otherwise to our peril. Society is served better by a system that removes specific problems rather than pitting groups against each other.”

On appeal from the federal Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals, the case of Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, et al. v. The Inclusive Communities Project, Inc, addressed a festering legal problem regarding the Fair Housing Act’s use to address accusations of disparate racial impact instead of enforcing the law on a case-by-case, as-needed basis as was argued by its supporters when it was debated in Congress.

Specific to this case, the Inclusive Communities Project (ICP) claimed the Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs, a state agency, violated the federal Fair Housing Act by allocating housing tax credits to developers in a manner that they alleged broadly kept minorities in low-income minority-majority neighborhoods rather than allowing access to housing opportunities in wealthier majority-white communities in the Dallas metropolitan area. ICP charged the department’s tax credit distribution policy creates a disparate impact on black recipients of such credits as a class rather than addressing individual instances of alleged abuse.

Project 21 joined a legal brief submitted to the Court that asked the justices to specifically define the legal scope of the Fair Housing Act. In the brief, it was argued that the Act was written “to apply solely to disparate treatment, not acts having disparate impact on protected classes” and that the U.S. Supreme Court must “consider the threshold question of whether disparate impact claims are even cognizable under the Fair Housing Act” since “disparate impact claims do not depend on the intent of the action or policy.”

This legal brief joined by Project 21 was written and submitted to the Court by the Pacific Legal Foundation and was also joined by the Center for Equal Opportunity, Competitive Enterprise Institute, Cato Institute, Individual Rights Foundation and Reason Foundation.

In 2014 and 2015, Project 21 members have already been interviewed or cited by the media over 2,600 times — including TVOne, the Philadelphia Inquirer, Fox News Channel, Westwood One, St. Louis Post-Dispatch, SiriusXM satellite radio and 50,000-watt talk radio stations such as KOA-Denver, WHO-Des Moines, WJR-Detroit, WBZ-Boston and KDKA-Pittsburgh — on issues that include civil rights, entitlement programs, the economy, race preferences, education and corporate social responsibility. Project 21 has participated in cases before the U.S. Supreme Court regarding race preferences and voting rights and defended voter ID laws at the United Nations. Its volunteer members come from all walks of life and are not salaried political professionals.

Project 21, a leading voice of black conservatives for over two decades, is sponsored by the National Center for Public Policy Research (http://www.nationalcenter.org).

Share

Senate Snake Pit – These 48 GOP Traitors Voted For Obama Dictatorship, Pacific Union Over US

Even though citizens have no idea what is in the Obamatrade Treaty the fake republicans are so eager to pass, here is one example of what is being said about it.

The following list contains the names of the unworthy holders of the office of United States Senator who voted Tuesday to surrender the self-governing authority of the American people as well as much of their Congressional power. They voted to trust that the criminal Hussein Obama would be a benevolent dictator. These wholly purchased puppets, with their access, must have known at least as much as we lay people do, that they were voting to end American sovereignty. They cannot deny their actions based upon well-intentioned ignorance. They knew, Senator Sessions argued repeatedly on the floor of the Senate exposing their actions. They took deliberate action against our nation. These traitors voted to: Sign away American sovereignty to international tribunals Turn over control of U.S. immigration policy to foreign nations Empower Hussein Obama with dictatorial authority over America in the name of “climate change” Cripple America’s economy in the name of establishing corporate monopolies Establish Corporate Fascism as the new form of government in the United States Establish a Replacement Government, the Pacific Union Potentially nullify the Second Amendment through mandated compliance with UN small arms treaty Obligate American taxpayers to a secret “legal system,” of corporate extortion Obligate Americans […]

Source: Senate Snake Pit – These 48 GOP Traitors Voted For Obama Dictatorship, Pacific Union Over USA | ConstitutionRising.com

Share

Builders flood Congress to block Obama’s EPA rules for creeks

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency wants to put under federal oversight any pond or stream that has a “significant nexus” to a navigable waterway, even if the smaller body of water flows just a few weeks a year. Opponents fear it could mean permission would be needed to even dig a small ditch or build a road.

Source: Builders flood Congress to block Obama’s EPA rules for creeks – Personal Liberty

Share

If the EPA Wants My Old Woodstove, Beware the Bullets When They Come to Get It

*Editor’s Comment* – When the EPA bans the use of inefficient (by their fascist standards) wood-burning stoves, the bastards can come and get mine. Caution to EPA: Beware of multiple gunshots flying in your direction upon entry.

“The EPA has finalized a 344-page rule to make wood stoves more environmentally friendly, meaning that millions of Americans will soon be forced to buy more expensive wood-fired stoves.”<<<Read More>>>

Share

How Many Guns Do You Own….Quietly?

I may possibly own several, maybe even hundreds of guns. If I do, not one of them is registered or ever will be. But then again maybe I don’t own any. Either way, the hypocritical GOVERNMENT can go to hell.

UndocumentedGuns

Share

Global Warming to Cause More, Severe Storms….But, Don’t Go Look

I have often repeated the story of my nephew, who at around age 3, told his father, “Dad, I’ve finished eating my lunch….but don’t go look.”

The nonsensical hysteria of end-of-earth blathering, because of global warming, caused by man and therefore man must pay, continues, despite facts. Government-controlled, useful idiots, are continuing to repeat Government’s lies that global warming is going to make us all dead due to more and bigger storms; one report even claiming that if we don’t do something about global warming, Bruce Springsteen might begin to actually carry a tune.

“A major “scientific” study issued in the summer of 2013 by a climate researcher at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) warned of increased activity of killer hurricanes because of global warming/climate change.”<<<Read More>>>

We’re all going to die……or be subjected to more Bruce Springsteen music. BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share