June 23, 2018

When Guns Are Banned, Criminals Will Get and Make Homemade Weapons

And so will a lot of other people. As well they will keep many weapons is safe places where they can’t be easily found for confiscation.

Laws don’t stop “honest” people. Why do we insist they will stop criminals?

Link to: How ‘Improvised’ And ‘Craft-Built’ Weapons Kill All Gun Control Arguments

Share

Drones Cheering Drone Weaponry

Share

Question 3 Asks The Wrong Question

With each passing day I read more of the debate about Maine’s referendum Question 3, in which the proposers intend to create some sort of hocus-pocus, jibber-jabber about something called a universal background check in order to keep guns out of the hands of criminal murderers – and so they target lawful citizens.

No matter how the issue is sliced and diced, guns aren’t the problem…nor are cars, baseball bats, golf clubs, butcher’s knives, poison, airplanes, bombs, pharmaceuticals, chemicals, doctors, lawyers, politicians, presidents, and the words that come out of your mouth. All of these things, and more, can and do kill people everyday and yet because of our “conditioning” we can only talk about guns, with some lofty notion that if we could just get rid of all of them…well, Kumbaya.

Never, ever is the discussion about why people want to kill other people. Never. Objects are only weapons, tools, to cause trauma and death by a person to another person. Perhaps it’s time to change the discussion and focus on why there is so much anger and hatred that it causes a person to do such unexplained, heinous acts.

And my day wouldn’t be complete if I didn’t say:

BUT DON’T GO LOOK!

Share

What Makes a Murderer?

InanimateObjects

Share

Consequences of a Bull Session

Share

Slingshot Engineering – Not So Good Execution

While some states, like Maine, are contemplating small game hunting seasons for slingshots, maybe this video could be a teaching moment. During debate in Maine over a slingshot season, one person wanted to know about the killing forces of slingshots. Nobody could answer all the questions, simply because nobody knew anything about the weapon…but were very quick to dispel the use as mostly nonsense.

Viewing this video should help to answer some questions about whether or not a slingshot is capable of killing an animal. As with any weapon, the effectiveness is controlled by the users ability, through practice, to wield the weapon as effectively as possible. In this video it shows the person firing the slingshot to demonstrate force of impact and yet didn’t consider what might happen if the steel ball he was shooting bounced back toward him.

It also shows the force of such a weapon, nearly killing the man, when the steel ball ricochets off the wall, returns and strikes him in the head. Imagine the force before the loss of energy hitting the wall.

Share

Don’t Be So Quick to Dispel Slingshot Hunting

I read and giggled what George Smith had written on his website about discussions on a proposed bill that would provide for hunting small game with a slingshot. LD 291 seemed to have been quickly dismissed but with much ignorance on display.

Smith writes:

Animal rights activists turned out in force to testify against the bill as did DIF&W.

Daryl DeJoy testified that his ten years of attending legislative hearings, “I have yet to testify before a bill as poorly thought out as I believe LD 291 to be… As one commentator on our Facebook page asked, ‘What’s next, baiting chipmunks?”

Judy Camuso, on behalf of DIF&W, testified against the bill. Her testimony was thorough and convincing, raising many problems with hunting with slingshots, including technical and enforcement problems.

It always amazes me that everything to do with hunting and weapons is always approached from the position that those using the weapons are out of control psychopaths whose intention is to willy-nilly kill everything in sight – death and destruction. Oh my God!

In listening to the testimony in Augusta, one person questioned about if anyone knew or had any information about the speed and killing force of a slingshot. Essentially nobody offered any information, assuming then that decisions might be made from the position of willful ignorance.

In the DeJoy testimony, mentioned above by Smith, he rails on about how making a slingshot a viable weapon for small game hunting would do nothing but create injured wildlife, injured pets and a myriad of other problems intended to present the idea as nothing but uncontrolled, irresponsible killing….like bow hunting, rifle hunting, muzzleloader hunting, etc. are? NONSENSE!

Maine Department of Inland Fisheries and Wildlife opposes such a bill, evidently for “technical and enforcement problems”. I understand but I don’t understand. I’m thinking this is much like the story of the neighbor who went next door to borrow an ax. The man said he couldn’t borrow his ax because it was Tuesday. When asked what Tuesday had to do with it, the neighbor answered, “Nothing. But if I don’t want you to borrow my ax, one excuse is as good as another.”

How many people do you know of that have slingshots? What kind of a problem exists at present with “uncontrolled” uses of slingshots? “Injured wildlife”? “Injured pets”? Why should anyone think providing a small game season for slingshot hunting as something that is going to cause all kinds of “unintended consequences” as was stated by the Senator presenting the bill?

It must be, using the same rationale, that there are “unintended consequences” along with injured wildlife, injured pets and lack of supervision when it comes to archery hunting. No, it’s because of the ignorance and emotional utter nonsense that always seems to rear it’s head in such issues.

Obviously, from what I have read and heard during testimony, ignorance of slingshots is at an all time high and evidently the best way to deal with this issue is to scoff at it and get rid of the proposal before anybody has to find out anything and/or education themselves about the issue. But I guess nobody has time. Gotta go check on those radio collars.

In parts of the United States, slingshot use and hunting, as well as competition events, are common. The skill set is quite remarkable. Instead of shaking one’s head and imagining two boys using a slingshot to kill the neighbor’s dog or cat, why not first educate yourself. Do people practice archery and target practice with their guns and rifles on a neighbor’s cat or dog? Not as a rule but somehow if Maine should implement a season of small game hunting with slingshots, all of these things will happen. Slingshots cause uncontrolled killing.

Slingshots, of the right size and manufacture, are viable weapons. Just like Maine has decided that .22 long rifle caliber rifles cannot be used for deer hunting, so too would limitations and regulations, just like all other disciplines, be placed on slingshots.

One person argued it would be uncontrollable because the the weapon is silent. I’m sure glad arrows go bang when they are shot out of a bow. I’m glad traps can be heard slamming shut. It’s a good thing fish scream when hooked by a fisherman. And those earth tremors we feel, are to let us know somebody threw their trash and personal waste on the ground. How ridiculous can we become?

I know little about the exact wording or the intent of the person who proposed the bill (they didn’t show up for testimony evidently) but I would certainly hope that before the Maine Fish and Wildlife Committee would toss out this idea, they think it through thoroughly. There are benefits to having such a season.

And how can any government agency not be chomping at the bit to provide another means of taking tax money to license and regulate such an activity. Hasn’t stop them in the past.

Fear the SLINGSHOT!

Share

Quadrotor Killing Machine

Consider the possibilities!

Share

Big Sandy Shoot

VIDEO:

Share