June 16, 2021

ENVIRONMENTALIST PUSHES POLITICAL SCIENCE DISINFORMATION/FACTS PROVE OTHERWISE

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

 

Starting out with an excerpt of disinformation, falsehood. 

“While no group is immune to believing conspiracy theories, the anti-wolf position relies on them. The nice thing (or actually the bad thing) about conspiracy theories is that they are almost immune to facts. For example, giving a clear factual rebuttal of a conspiracy theory usually just leads its believers to simply say it shows the fact giver is part of the conspiracy.”

“Regarding the wolf restoration, many anti-wolf people have been led to believe it is a conspiracy to bring a gigantic non-native beast to Idaho, Montana, Wyoming, from the “far away land” of Canada. Instead, they say, any efforts to recover wolves should have been to restore a supposedly timid, small, and best of all, never seen, native wolf of the Rocky Mountains, canis lupus irremotus.”

It is further said that wolf recovery is part of a greater conspiracy to end hunting, destroy game animals, bring in more federal control (or perhaps even United Nations control under something named Agenda 21), destroy gun rights, and the like. The motivation for the conspirators is malice, and under Agenda 21 the goal is the removal of the residents of small towns and rural areas to create a gigantic wildlife preserve.”—Ralph Maughan

THATS AN ACADEMIAC FOR YA, TOTAL BULLSHIT; IT’S NOT EVEN GOOD BULLSHIT, UNLESS OF COURSE YOU’RE LYING TO A THIRD GRADE DUNCE;

The military has been in control of “governmental services” in this country since 1863 when Lincoln bankrupted the original United States (Trading Company). Read the Lieber Code, also known as General Order 100.  Together with the Geneva Convention Protocols, this is the “martial law” that the “citizens of the United States” are subjugated under. Additionally read Whitings War Powers Act.

Also these large multinational internationally owned “governmental services corporations”  YOU citizens are subjugated under are PRIVATELY OWNED —- the “UNITED STATES” which went insolvent again in March of 2015, and “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” which is taking over the services contract.  The “UNITED STATES” corporation has been run by the UN Corporation doing business as the International Monetary Fund, both French corporations which operated out of the Commonwealth of Puerto Rico to take control of all resources. “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” corporation is now being run by the UN Corporation doing business as the Federal Reserve, set up under the laws and auspices of the United Nations corporation City-State.

See UNIDROIT out of Rome managed by the Aldobrandini family, all U.N. Charters originate there.

This is where all the “UN law” comes in. The UN Corporation owns both. corporations  The UN Corporation is owned by the World Bank.  And the World Bank is Managed by Jacob Rothschild who manages the Vatican Wealth, The World Bank is owned by the British Crown Conglomerate, which is owned by the Vatican, which is owned by the Holy See. The World bank funded the UNEP and Agenda 2100 documents and funds the implementation of those Sustainable Development environmental theories into the infrastructure of the federal and estate governments. Every County.. So while mister Maughan rants on about ranchers being titled nobility he himself serves the Titled Nobility who owns the corporate entities listed above.. ALL OF THIS CREATED CORPORATE PROPERTY IS PRIVATE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY OWNED BY THOSE WHO THOUGHT IT ALL UP.. And that is listed in the intellectual property data base WIPO..

NOW;

Having read The First Global Revolution, by the Club of Rome the academics indoctrinators. And the UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment. And the entire Earth Summit  Agenda 21 = 2030-2050-2100 futuristic plans for human population control it is clear to me most college professors retired or not are entirely full of shit. Anyone who has accomplished a deep forensic analysis of this evidence and of the history of politics and nation state establishment understands it is a political global revolution and that history has proven that all political revolutions always destroy far more resources and people and the loss of liberty than they create. The social engineers behind this global revolution all lives not for the social change they are allegedly creating but have masked their desires of depopulation and destruction of cultures societies and mankind behind the curtain of their cause, sustainable development for future generations. Behind the founding documents of the eugenics disguised as environmentalism movement many fools have attached themselves to.

The documents are simply terms of war to be used against mankind. A declaration of war. To bring economic strife deindustrialization and depopulation about via the UNEP/A.2100/The First Global Revolution/Environmental Sustainable{Also connected is the Global 2,000 Report by Kissinger given to Carter} Hoax via the WORLD BANKS funding these groups depopulation-ist motives which is an act of war against the average man, just dumb animals according to their thinking… I take it personal. It is a very serious matter.  Making light of it as these environmentalist groupies do is proof they’re ignorant or worse in on it because they believe in it. 

Agenda 21

http://green-agenda.com/agenda21.html

Effective execution of Agenda 21 will require a profound reorientation of all human society, unlike anything the world has ever experienced a major shift in the priorities of both governments and individuals and an unprecedented redeployment of human and financial resources. This shift will demand that a concern for the environmental consequences of every human action be integrated into individual and collective decision-making at every level.
– excerpt, UN Agenda 21

Agenda 21 – The UN Blueprint for the 21st Century

The thing is nobody validates the documented facts. In the above disinformation at the top of this thread the author validates nothing. He is merely cleverly opining because he knows he can get away with it. This man is a liar of the worst kind in my opinion. Anyone claiming wolf reintroduction is the conspiracy itself is highly misinformed. The wolf issue is a mere drop in the bucket of a much larger politically motivated environmental issue. These Global Biodiversity Assessment Advised  changes speaking on sustainability by UNEP based off the 1140 page UNEP document itself are much larger in scope than wildlife management issues.  These changes involve every aspect of political and economic change including banking and industry on various levels not only nationally but internationally. Listed are all multiple use activities on public and “private lands” as being unsustainable.. ALL OF IT even his walking about leaving foot prints on public land. Public land these enviro fool think they own.. 

“Building an environmentally sustainable future
requires nothing short of a REVOLUTION…
restructuring the GLOBAL ECONOMY,
dramatically changing human reproductive
behaviour
 and altering values and lifestyles.”

– Lester Brown,
President of WorldWatch International

Agenda 21 is a one hundred years plan with goals to be attained by 2030 then again by 2050 with the plan concluding by the year 2100. Most of the evidence of the document is no longer easily  available and the document itself is several hundred pages. Anyone relying upon the 294 page Earth Summit Agenda 21 The United Nations Programme Of Action From Rio 1992 booklet is not studying the entire treaty. And the document itself has quietly been expanding in terms over the last 24 years. It has been quite obvious to those few of us who read these legal documents that most people talking about Agenda 21 have never read the document, and have never heard of the UNEP document.  And have never done a deep forensic analysis of the people behind this ideology. This rewilding movement goes back over 100 years and involved key political and financial characters within the international clique or community, all quite well known people. Including several U.S. puppet presidents. 

All of these authors of these international documents are openly admitted eugenicists. The article the quoted material was pulled from by Mr. Maughan is simply directed towards people that read his crap who have no understanding of the big picture itself and will never validate any of the information for themselves. They’ll just keep taking his word for it.  I believe he is being very clever myself. This is a long range depopulation of people agenda concluding by the year 2100. A set population goal for the “globe” of 500,000,000 people serving the global elite. I’ve seen the numbers as low as 500,000. 

The people and their posterity that set this Global plan into motion wrote that.  Meat consumption is to be eliminated. Hunting eliminated. Private Gun ownership eliminated. Now think about it, they’re allegedly establishing world peace, well guns will no longer be needed if there is world peace. And if meat consumption by the year 2100 has been socially engineered out of the minds of the new society hunting will have been a thing of the past by then. People, the little citizen average people will not own any property, in truth they don’t now, just don’t pay your property taxes and see how long you live free in that house you bought. The subjects of the future they will be provided for as long as they are of use.  Right now we see deindustrialization and peoples entire careers being lost. The property, Earth will be owned by the designers of this Global International States “world peace”.. So in a nut shell a lot of the scare mongering we’re reading about these days is simply social engineering for the future generations, albeit at this moment slowly being implemented at the same time..

The Green Depopulation of People Agenda

http://green-agenda.com/globalrevolution.html

The Global International Banana Republic to be completed by the year 2100 is something none living today born prior of the year 2,000 will be around to see, if they pull this off. Agenda 2100 is happening, just not over night. What do these environmentalists constantly speak of? THEY SPEAK OF IDEOLOGIES STRAIGHT OUT OF THE INTERNATIONAL DOCUMENTS EVIDENCE PRESENTED ABOVE.. Over population of people. Anti hunting. Anti meat consumption. Guns are a nasty extension of the hunters penis. Anti farming and ranching which is food production. Anti grazing of public lands. Anti beef, in fact Wuerthner just posted an article condemning all beef growers. They even speak of taking lands away from private owners around national parks. Anti mining. Anti oil exploration. Anti industry, they’re even anti new construction, urban and worse rural sprawl. Every single item the environmental clique are advocating for is straight out of The UNEP Global Biodiversity Assessment Document, and out the Earth Summit Agenda 21 The United Nations Programme Of Action From Rio 1992 document, all written by the United Nations.  Still environmentalists who know of this evidence dishonestly steer people away from the evidence because the fact is the legal terms within these documents are quite damning to the current lifestyles of the people they are against. The cause of the economic strife. Joblessness. Poverty creation. Depopulation. Its all there. There is so much evidence to the contrary of what Maughan is claiming I’d have to write it out for days and days and it would be thousands of pages of legal documentation. This issue is not as simple to debunk as he claims.

Now laugh every time these environmentalists say something about ORIGINAL THINKING!!!!!SOCIALLY ENGINEERED THOUGHTS IS MORE ACCURATE..BY THE CLUB OF ROMAN DOOM..

The authors of the corporate controlled opposition environmentalism movement have clearly stated the enemy is humanity. They are saving the Earth from Humanity. The legal evidence and the history of those behind this social engineering speaks for itself.  Mr. Maughan is simply full of crap.

Those same authors established the Sierra Club.  And various other environmental group brand names.  Most of the people belong to those clubs are ignorant. The leadership of those clubs are deceivers.

The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”

– Club of Rome

Basically if they cannot manage the population growth with the possibility of people catching onto their power structure they lose power. 

Sustainable Development 

http://green-agenda.com/sustainabledevelopment.html

APPENDIX I

https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/08/06/appendices/

WILDLANDS

TOWARDS A WILDER EUROPE DEVELOPING AN ACTION AGENDA FOR WILDERNESS AND LARGE NATURAL HABITAT AREAS
http://www.europarc.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/05/2012_Wild_Europe_European_Commission_Towards_a_wilder_Europe.pdf

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

A Little Background History of Pedigree

TOWARDS A WILDER EUROPE DEVELOPING AN ACTION AGENDA FOR WILDERNESS AND LARGE NATURAL HABITAT AREAS

It may do us good, to investigate a little more closely one of the participants, in league with the others, sponsoring the rewilding publication.

The participant in question is the, “Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts (UK)”, whose name is included, among others, at the bottom of the publications pages (acting as its back-cover), to which, together with the other participants, they so lavishly helped to facilitate its sponsorship, in drawing attention to the ambitions of Agenda 21’s Depopulating Programme of Rewilding Europe.

It is not here proposed that an in-depth analysis of this organizations philanthropic pursuits are examined, which unquestionably have done much good, but what is proposed, is to be made aware of the background connections behind these organizations, and their far reaching interests in influencing much of human progress, or as the individual is free to determine for themselves, their far reaching influence in deceivingly stifling human progress.

The case to be presented, is one of providing a sequence of openly available information in the form of website links, that admittedly show that ‘the owners’ behind various philanthropic organizations as ‘their founders’ to them, and not forgetting that that which is ‘founded’ by you is clearly owned by you, surely have strong ties to the contribution of Agenda 21’s ambitions of, ‘harmonising humanities numbers to the earth’s ability of providing sustenance for sustainability to be viable’.

“The Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts or RSWT…was previously known by the names Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves and Royal Society for Nature Conservation.”

History –

“The forerunner of the RSWT, the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, was established by Charles Rothschild in 1912. It aimed initially to draw up a list of the country’s best wildlife sites with a view to purchase for protection as nature reserves, and by 1915 it had drawn up a list of 284, known as Rothschild Reserves.”

Source:

Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Royal_Society_of_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Nathaniel Charles Rothschild (9 May 1877 – 12 October 1923), known as “Charles”, was an English banker and entomologist and a member of the Rothschild family.

Family –

Charles Rothschild worked as a partner in the family bank NM Rothschild and Sons in London.

Nature conservation –

He was concerned about the loss of wildlife habitats, and in 1912 set up the Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves, the forerunner of The Wildlife Trusts partnership. In 1915 the Society produced a schedule of the best wildlife sites in the country, some of which were purchased as nature reserves.

Marriage –

In 1907 Charles Rothschild married Rozsika Edle von Wertheimstein (1870 – 30 June 1940), a Hungarian baroness and descendent of…one of the wealthiest families in Europe and had made their fortune over a century before the Rothschilds.

Source:

Charles Rothschild
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Rothschild

~

The Rothschild Reserves –

In 1912 Charles Rothschild founded the ‘Society for the Promotion of Nature Reserves’ (SPNR).

More on the Rothschild Reserves –

“What was new about this approach to preserving ‘wild life’ was that it focussed on the habitatrather than just the individual species within it. It highlighted a growing belief that places needed protection from development and other damage. It showed a desire for an ordered and reasoned approach to acquiring nature reserves, in the face of increasign pressure on the natural world and culminated in a ‘shopping list’ of ideal sites – the Rothschild Reserves.”

“…the SPNR always established who the landowner was. The intention at this time was to purchase the land, turn it into a nature reserve and then hand it over to the National Trust to manage under special conditions.”

“It was believed that it was better to fence off nature and leave it to its own devices, rather than practically manage it…”

“The elite conservation crusaders could be seen to have inhabited a moral high ground where, from a lofty height, they shook their fists at progress in their quest for ‘primeval country’ and their desire to shut it off.”

Source:

The Wildlife Trusts, The Rothschild Reserves
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/rothschildreserves

~

Climate Change & Wildlife –

Climate change is a significant threat to the UK’s wildlife. The Wildlife Trusts believe thatnature should be central to both climate change adaptation (e.g. through the use of natural processes to reduce flood risk) and mitigation (e.g. through the protection and restoration of peat and peatlands to store and sequester carbon).”

“However there is now widespread agreement among scientists that we are living in an era of accelerated climate change, much of which can be attributed to increased human activity (for example through increased carbon emmissions from air pollution).”

Note.-

The words in the phrase, ‘widespread agreement among scientists’, are words that can only be attributed to ‘conflict-of-interest’ based political consesus science, and NOT ‘factual science’.

Climate change means that there are complex demands being placed on land for food, wildlife, recreation and development. Wildlife has adapted to climate change in the past but our modern landscapes – full of buildings, transport links and intensively managed farmland and fragmented natural habitats – present a new challenge to species. It is vital that we manage and use land sustainably, so it allows plants and animals to move and adapt to new conditions for survival as the climate changes. The Wildlife Trusts’ vision for A Living Landscape is working to bring about landscape scale restoration of the natural environment and adaptation to climate change, realising and using the multiple benefits provided by nature.”

“Protecting and restoring our natural environment and ecosystems is important in its own right…Flood prevention, crop pollination, carbon absorption, clean and healthy water sources – these benefits of our natural environment must all be considered and maximised as we prepare for the effects of climate change. Critically, we need to restore healthy, Living Landscapes that help to alleviate floods, control pollution and help us cope with extremes of temperature.”

“Many of The Wildlife Trusts’ Living Landscape schemes have been designed with climate change adaptation at the forefront. At the heart of Living Landscape approach is habitat restoration and connectivity.”

Source:

Climate Change & Wildlife
http://www.wildlifetrusts.org/climate-change

The Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Giammaria Ortes:
The Decadent Venetian Kook Who Originated The Myth of “Carrying Capacity”
http://american_almanac.tripod.com/ortes.htm

Recruiting the military for Agenda 21’s depopulation genocidal murder

Sustainbilities justification for depopulation, is that there are too many people to harmonise with the earth’s environment, and therefore depopulation is an absolute necessity. Of course, with the fraudulent excuse of false ‘climate change’ science as the driving force behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s ambitions for mass genocidal murder, it comes as no surprise that the Self-Ennobling Ones law enforcement and in particular their military are now positioning and prioritising their role towards sustainablities climate change depopulation ‘development’ agenda, to have the military engage in excused mass murder, on behalf of the Self-Ennobling Ones, covertly presented under a ‘new energy security strategy’ –

PENTAGON PREPARES FOR CENTURY OF CLIMATE EMERGENCIES AND OIL WARS
http://www.blacklistednews.com/Pentagon_prepares_for_century_of_climate_emergencies_and_oil_wars/45538/0/38/38/Y/M.html

~

GB 2293 SPNC
Royal Society of Wildlife Trusts
This catalogue was digitised by The National Archives as part of the National
Register of Archives digitisation project
The National Archive
National Registar of Archives – NRA 24457

Centre for Urban and Regional Studies University of Birmingham and Institute of Agricultural History
University of Reading
A list of the historical records of the Society for the Promotion of Nature Conservation
Compiled by Philippa Bassett as part of a research project funded by the Social Science Research Council
August 1980

http://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/download/GB2293%20SPNC

~

World Wide Fund for Nature, WWF (formerly named the, World Wildlife Fund, WWF)

World Wildlife Fund / World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF)

Founders –

Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
Julian Huxley
Max Nicholson
Peter Scott
Guy Mountfort
Godfrey A. Rockefeller

The World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF) is an international non-governmental organizationfounded on April 29, 1961, and is working on issues regarding the conservation, research and restoration of the environment. It was formerly named the World Wildlife Fund… It is theworld’s largest conservation organization with over 5 million supporters worldwide, working in more than 100 countries, supporting around 1,300[5] conservation and environmental projects. WWF is a foundation,[6] in 2010 deriving 57% of funding from individuals and bequests, 17% from government sources (such as the World Bank, DFID, USAID) and 11% from corporations.”

The group’s mission is “to stop the degradation of the planet’s natural environment and to build a future in which humans live in harmony with nature.”[7] Currently, much of its work focuses on the conservation of three biomes that contain most of the world’s biodiversity: oceans and coasts, forests, and freshwater ecosystems. Among other issues, it is also concerned withendangered species, pollution and climate change.”

Note.-

It is recommended that the entire page is read to acquire a brief working understanding and background to the WWF

Source:

World Wide Fund for Nature
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Wide_Fund_for_Nature

~

There is nothing cuddly about the WWF
http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100030769/there-is-nothing-cuddly-about-the-wwf/

____

Use of the Glass Prism of Doublespeak to De-mystify Meaning

It becomes clear what the Self-Ennobling Ones agenda really is, for which they have worked diligently towards over a great deal of time, and how in the use of understanding “doublespeak”, they convey that agenda to each other worldwide, as well as to their mis-guided minions.

With a serious appreciation of “doublespeak”, we can come to see it in use for ourselves with negative events around the world demonstrably at odds with official explanations for them, given as one of a ‘rosy outlook’ for the future, when quite obviously the real situation on the ground points to ‘a planned grim outlook’ for the future.

The information to follow then must be interpreted through the light prism of “doublespeak”, through which wording is shone to separate its material for the purpose of seeing true meaning conveyed. That is to say, the opposite of what is presented.

This will no doubt mean, perhaps that given all the accompanying evidence, what is seen before us is not ‘crisis management’ to avert disaster and to ensure continuity for a ‘rosy outlook’ into the future, but through the prisim of doublespeak, what is seen before us are the Self-Ennobling Ones as gods at play, with their preplanned “games” devised for ‘managed controlled rehearsals’ to ensure discontinuity and great suffering through their devices and mechanisms of control.

REFERENCE MATERIAL:

Defininition of Doublespeak

– language that can be understood in more than one way and that is used to trick or deceive people

– language used to deceive usually through concealment or misrepresentation of truth

Sourced:

Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/doublespeak

Definition of Doublespeak

Doublespeak is language that deliberately disguises, distorts, or reverses the meaning of wordsIt may also refer to intentional ambiguity in language or to actual inversions of meaning (for example, naming a state of war “peace”).

Sourced:

Wikipedia
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doublespeak

From the description given of “doublespeak”, the agenda behind the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy becomes clear –

‘Sustainablility and its development’, is a cruel deception in which a vast majority of people in the world, as victims of its ‘doublespeak hidden agenda’, work towards their own elimination, with the enslavement of the surviving few, housed in concentration camp ‘smart growth’ community dwellings, serving the rest of their miserable lives as serfs to the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy.

The prevailing mental condition then is controlled insanity –

Doublespeak is saying one thing and meaning another, usually its opposite.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/dblspkthennow.shtml

Doublethink means the power of holding two contradictory beliefs in one’s mind simultaneously, and accepting both of them.
http://www.orwelltoday.com/doublethink.shtml

Reader – doublethink
http://www.orwelltoday.com/readerdoublethink.shtml

Doublespeak publications –

United Nations Publications
PDF Publications
https://unp.un.org/Browse80b2.html?pdf=1

Control of Raw Materials –

The Hunger Games (2012)
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt1392170/

Note.-

What is of particular interest in the movie, The Hungar Games, is the backdrop through which the movie and the characters are framed. This backdrop of infrastructure is a future sustaiable development environment.

FOR EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES ONLY

The Real Hungar Games (Sustainable Development post 2015) –

Ensuring Discontinuity through Management Game Play –

Food Chain Reaction: A Global Food Security Game
1250 24th Street, NW | Washington, DC 20037
info@foodchainreaction.org | © 2015 World Wildlife Fund, Inc.
http://foodchainreaction.org/

Note.-

We read –

About the Organizers

Food Chain Reaction is being produced by World Wildlife Fund and the Center for American Progress, with game design from CNA. Funding and technical support for Food Chain Reaction has been provided by Cargill with major support from Mars, Inc. Additional funding has been provided by Sealed Air Corporation.

Source:

Food Chain Reaction – A Global Food Security Game
About
http://foodchainreaction.org/index.php/about/

~

Organisational Structural Chart for the Control of Raw Material
http://www.larouchepub.com/graphics/1995/eir2249/Freem01.jpg

Source:

The Windsors’ Global Food Cartel: Instrument for Starvation
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1995/2249_windsor_food.html

Primary Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/1995/2249_food_intro.html

Alternative Sourcing:

Who Is Responsible for the World Food Shortage
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/esp_sociopol_depopu38.htm

Hinting towards an arm of sustainable developments preplanned depopulation agenda –

How would your nearest city be affected by a bomb the size of that dropped on Hiroshima?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/asia/japan/11786876/How-would-your-nearest-city-be-affected-by-a-bomb-the-size-of-Hiroshima.html?frame=3399391

~

Note.-

To understand the necessity for war, using manufactured antagonism between countries as a veil to set about eliminating the true enemy (people), particularly timed for the need to distract from discovering the bankers lie of economy, and providing for the bonus of killing two birds with one stone, when it comes to meeting the requirements of obedience and Agenda 21’s depopulation goals.

SPECULATIVE DATES GIVEN FOR WORLD WAR III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/03/25/speculative-dates-given-for-world-war-iii/

WHEN DID WORLD WAR III BEGIN ?

The prelude to war can be traced as far back as 2008, when we look at the information under the subtitle heading,

‘PRECAUTIONS TO TRAGEDY TAKE LITTLE TIME IN READING SIMPLY PRESENTED SOLUTION’,

to be found part way down the document –

VACCINES
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2015/02/20/vaccines/

_______

Archive for Club of Rome
http://thearrowsoftruth.com/tag/club-of-rome/

~

The 1001: A Nature Trust
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_1001:_A_Nature_Trust

The 1001 Club
http://www.truedemocracy.net/hj32/05.html

The 1001 Club
Bankers, Intelligence Agents, and Raw Materials Executives Striving for a Sustainable Future
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club01.htm

Sourced:

* pre-December 2014 archived version of the site – Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics
https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/index.html

Institute for the Study of Globalization and Covert Politics
http://isgp.nl/

ISGP
https://wikispooks.com/w/index.php?title=ISGP&redirect=no

1001 Club – Incomplete Membership List
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_1001club02.htm

The ‘1001 Club’ – a nature trust
http://canadianpatriot.org/archives/1133

~

Transnational Classes and International Relations
By Kees Van der Pijl
https://books.google.pl/books?id=dk4JBjkYCIIC&pg=PA124&lpg=PA124&dq=Prince+Bernhard+%2B+club+of+rome&source=bl&ots=B1w0Os4QeH&sig=ltIb9MTkTUJipCMsFLv0AQ_4EvA&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0CFEQ6AEwCGoVChMI4ZPavcfvxgIVBf1yCh2-sgMT#v=onepage&q=Prince%20Bernhard%20%2B%20club%20of%20rome&f=false

~

For Educational Purposes Only –

Dr. Claude Martin, Switzerland – Board Member, International Institute for Sustainable Development, Former Director General of WWF
http://www.clubofrome.org/?p=802

~

We read –

The department was separated from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office in 1997

* Department for International Development (DFID)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Department_for_International_Development

~

We read –

The Duke of Edinburgh is the patron of many organisations, including WWF and the Duke of Edinburgh Award. The Duke was the first President of WWF-UK from its foundation in 1961 to 1982, and President of WWF-International from 1981 to 1996. He is now President Emeritus for WWF.
http://wwf.panda.org/what_we_do/where_we_work/borneo_forests/about_borneo_forests/borneo_prince_phillip.cfm

~

We read –

Their Patron is HRH The Prince of Wales.

The Wildlife Trusts
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Wildlife_Trusts

~

Our mission

To protect and sustainably manage natural ecosystems of the world; to conserve their biodiversity, with emphasis on threatened habitats and endangered species

How We Work –
http://www.worldlandtrust.org/about/how-we-work

~

World Conservation and Wildlife Trust
http://www.wcwtinternational.org/

~

United States Agency for International Development (USAID)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_Agency_for_International_Development

International Development United States Agency For
1300 Pennsylvania Avenue Nw
Washington, DC 20004
Web: http://www.usaid.gov

A privately held company in Washington, DC
http://www.manta.com/c/mb4n0yg/international-development-united-states-agency-for

International Development United States Agency For
Usaid M/Oaa/Cas
1300 Penn Avenue Nw Room 824-C
Washington, DC 20004 – View Map
Phone: (212) 713-4320
Web: http://www.usaid.gov
Own This Business?

A privately held company in Washington, DC
http://www.manta.com/c/mr4ry0l/international-development-united-states-agency-for

USAID Acronym List
http://www.usaidalumni.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/USAID-Acronym-List-020413.pdf

~

“Bernhard helped found the World Wildlife Fund (later renamed World Wide Fund for Nature), becoming its first President in 1961, and in 1970 establishing the WWF’s financial endowment “The 1001: A Nature Trust”. In 1954, he was a co-founder of the international Bilderberg Group, which has met annually since then to discuss corporate globalization…”

The Prince eventually went to work for the German chemical giant IG Farben, then the world’s fourth-largest company (which survives today as BASF, AGFA, and Bayer). After training, Bernhard became secretary to the board of directors at the Paris office in 1935.

“Prince Bernhard was a member of the “Reiter-SS”, a mounted unit of the SS and joined the Nazi party.[7] He later also joined the National Socialist Motor Corps.”

“With his global contacts, Bernhard in May 1954, was a key figure in organising a meeting at the Bilderberg Hotel in the Netherlands for the business elite and intellectuals of the Western World to discuss the economic problems in the face of what they characterized as the growing threat from Communism. This first meeting was successful, and it became an annual gathering known as the Bilderberg Group. The idea for the European Union, first proposed by Robert Schuman on 9 May 1950, was encouraged at Bilderberg.”

Note.-

It is recommended that the entire page is read

Source:

Prince Bernhard of Lippe-Biesterfeld
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prince_Bernhard_of_Lippe-Biesterfeld

~

Anton Rupert
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Rupert

~

Sir Julian Huxley is brother to Aldous Huxley

Souce:
Huxley, Arnold Family Tree
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley#/media/File:Huxley-Arnold_family_tree.svg

“Sir Julian Sorell Huxley FRS[1] (22 June 1887 – 14 February 1975) was a British evolutionary biologist, eugenicist, and internationalist.”

“He was secretary of the Zoological Society of London (1935–1942), the first Director of UNESCO, a founding member of the World Wildlife Fund and the first President of the British Humanist Association.”

“In 1959 he received a Special Award of the Lasker Foundation in the category Planned Parenthood – World Population. Huxley was a prominent member of the British Eugenics Society and its president from 1959–1962.”

Later career –

“Huxley, a lifelong internationalist with a concern for education, got involved in the creation of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO), and became the organization’s first director-general in 1946.”

“In a fortnight he dashed off a 60-page booklet on the purpose and philosophy of UNESCO, eventually printed and issued as an official document. There were, however, many conservative opponents of his scientific humanism. His idea of restraining population growth with birth control …”

“Huxley’s internationalist and conservation interests also led him, with Victor Stolan, Sir Peter Scott, Max Nicholson and Guy Mountfort, to set up the WWF (World Wide Fund for Nature under its former name of the World Wildlife Fund).”

Note.-

Recommended that the entire page is read

Source:

Julian Huxley
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julian_Huxley

~

UNESCO Its Purpose and Its Philosophy – The Task of Unifying the World Mind
https://orwelliania.wordpress.com/2013/02/17/unesco-its-purpose-and-its-philosophy-the-task-of-unifying-the-world-mind/

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ELmUY4KFUZc

World Evolutionary Humanism, Eugenics and UNESCO Pt 2
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ecx_u0mUHh4

Global Depopulation and the Eugenics Agenda (Full)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KHqdwmqu-h0

~

UNESCO –

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (French: Organisation des Nations unies pour l’éducation, la science et la culture; UNESCO) is a specialized agency of the United Nations (UN). Its purpose is to contribute to peace and security by promoting international collaboration through education, science, and culture in order to further universal respect for justice, the rule of law, and human rights along with fundamental freedom proclaimed in the United Nations Charter.[1] It is the heir of the League of Nations’International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.

Source:

UNESCO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNESCO

~

UNESCO – It’s Evil Purpose and Philosophy
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Iqv5Q8Ujj2s

~

“He was then married to Margaret “Margo” Kuhn Rockefeller for fifty three years.”

Godfrey A. Rockefeller
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godfrey_A._Rockefeller

~

Margaret Kuhn Rockefeller daughter of Richard Parker Kuhn

Source:

Caroline Parker Kuhn
b. 26 January 1925, d. 30 April 2011
http://www.woodvorwerk.com/vorwerk/g0/p611.htm

Richard P. Kuhn 1916
1916 Class Crest
Cullum No. 5528 • Jun 28, 1963 • Died in Bedford Hills, New York
Interred in St. Matthews Churchyard, Bedford Hills, NY
https://apps.westpointaog.org/Memorials/Article/5528/

Kuhn, Loeb & Co.
http://www.nndb.com/company/062/000124687/

In 1914 a few families (blood or business related) owning controlling stock in existing banks (such as in New York City) caused those banks to purchase controlling shares in the Federal Reserve regional banks. Examination of the charts and text in the House Banking Committee Staff Report of August, 1976 and the current stockholders list of the 12 regional Federal Reserve Banks show this same family control.

http://barefootsworld.net/docs/fedchart.txt

Source:

Who Is Running America ?
http://barefootsworld.net/usfraud.html

~

For Educational Purposes Only –

We note UNESCO’s founding influence in the settlement of the Self-Ennobling Ones intellectual copyright institutional agrrangements in securing inheritance rights, between themselves as gods, towards their successor-assigns as beneficiaries, when we read –

1. Introduction, page 533

“This essay returns to such an “old” conflict in the development of international copyright dating back to the signing of the Berne Convention for the Protection of Literary and Artistic Works on 9 September 1886. Translation, a constant “ pierre d’achoppement” in the evolutionary history of the Berne Convention, caused problems from the outset. These returned with full force at the fourth conference for the revision of the Berne Convention in Stockholm on 11-14 June 1967. Described by one participant as “the worst experience in the history of international copyright conventions”, Stockholm marked the culmination of several years’ discussion on the viability of the international copyright regime to accommodate the needs of developing nations.”

2. Brussels, June 1948, page 534

“The Bureaux Internationaux Réunis pour la Protection de la Propriété Intellectuelle (BIRPI), located in Berne, was the administrative seat from the inception of the treaty, and oversaw revision conferences in Berlin (1908), Rome(1928) and then Brussels (1948).”

subtitle, 2. Brussels, June 1948, page 535

“The United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization (UNESCO),played an important role in trying to redress a situation in which, in copyright terms, the world emerged from the war “virtually split into two entirely separate and independent parts”. Launched in 1945 as successor to the International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation (ICIC), UNESCO anchored its copyright policy in the 1948 Declaration on Human Rights.”

TIND Comment.-

UNESCO’s strategic deceptive foil of cover as camouflage, in the use of its development of “collectivist” terms for a “Declaration on Human Rights”, won them the approval of their competing proposals for the Self-Ennobling Ones to accept, as the best means of providing for an excuse to convince the victims of designed eugenicist wars, to relegate their ‘freedoms of independence’ to closer cooperation, or corporation, by compelling acquiescence of the general populace to such terms, out of “fear” of a repeat performance of world war, in it being said, that closer cooperation would quell the brutal urges of man.

They, the general populace at large, having no inkling whatsoever, that their compulsion to accept these copywritten terms had been by design, would also have no inkling, that UNESCO’s proposals had the further advantage of completely blinding them into not coming to an understanding that what was copywritten by them in turn, through the Self-Ennobling One’s instruments of deception, (without qualification under registration of ‘noncommital-to-contract’ to copywritten-countries, but merely to record), would effectively provide the means for the Self-Ennobling Ones agencies to ‘collectively’ interfere in the ownership of their intellectual property.

Interfere as superior authorities to a now admitted subordinate position of a registrant, and that through copyright registration ‘without qualificaiton’, it was an admission that registrants were mentally incapable of maintaining their own affairs, in the same way a child lacked the mental capacity to provide for themselves, by demonstrably not understanding the requirements of speaking-up in their own self-interests, as an adult would understand to do, given their circumstances in the world as being functionally independent, and with the recognition that that independence brings, of having the cognition to voice that independence in line with their self-interests and circumstances.

Failure to speak-up, would no doubt reflect on their mental capacities as being immature and in need of assistance by rightly remaining in the charge of an adult parental figure providing for stewardship, to guide and decide what would be in their best interests. Such arrangements, of course, could find their victims intellectual rights the subject of ‘profitable confiscation’ by any number of ‘seemingly’ legitimate means.

The reader to the preceding may remain unperturbed, since as it ought to be well known, any formal relationships entered into, calls for honesty in the interests of fairness for obvious, fair and full disclosure to be provided – for the very reason that genuine ‘fairness’ can only be the basis of authenticity and therefore legitamcy – otherwise, whatsoever arrangements were entered into without full disclosure made known as to the true nature of the operations of the parties to a relationship, would justly render those arrangements ‘null and void’. And that being the case, without having even to speak of ‘the requirements of justice’.

Continuing, page 535

“Prior to the Brussels conference, UNESCO had already noted how copyright was a “barrier” to the “free flow of culture among all the peoples of the world”. In the next few years, UNESCO instigated a number of copyright initiatives culminating in 1952 with The Universal Copyright Convention(UCC).

In sum, the UCC offered an international multilateral convention with lower levels of protection than Berne, thus providing a vehicle for the US to come into the fold of multilateral international copyright agreements. Several specificities in national legislation kept the US outside Berne until 1989; these were primarily the compulsory registration of copyright and the controversial manufacturing requirement, which afforded English-language books copyright protection in the US only if manufacturedon American soil. As a compromise between the formal registration required by US law and the no formalities-Berne framework, the UCC introduced the use of a ©symbol, making it possible for the US and other countries to sign the UCC without having to change their national legislation.”

Source:

Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS :THE BERNE CONVENTIONAND THE 1967 STOCKHOLM DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE REVISITED
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén
http://www.academia.edu/432552/_Colonial_Copyright_Postcolonial_Publics_the_Berne_Convention_and_the_1967_Stockholm_Diplomatic_Conference_Revisited_

United International Bureaux for the Protection of Intellectual Property
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_International_Bureaux_for_the_Protection_of_Intellectual_Property

World Intellectual Property Organisation
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Intellectual_Property_Organization

Multilateral agreements and a TRIPS-plus world:
The World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO)
http://www.geneva.quno.info/pdf/WIPO(A4)final0304.pdf

~

We read –

“It is the heir of the League of Nations’ International Committee on Intellectual Cooperation.”

Source:

UNESCO
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNESCO

Of course, the League of Nations was the first fictitious global corporate institution, ready in waiting, to ‘tranisition’ the people of the world into ‘the idea of global governance’ after the scare tactics of fear in World War One (WWI), soon to be replaced with its permanent successor, after the follow up of WWII to ‘secure’ the establishment of the strategy of fear in bringing about an immovable seat for the readiness of permanent global governance in the form of the United Nations –

League of Nations
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/League_of_Nations`

~

In developments further unifying and solidifying the Self-Ennobling Ones fictitious interests in stealthly centralizing the means with which to confiscate the physical realm, we read, they have superseded and made obsolete the Universal Copyright Convention for that of the World Trade Organisation’s ‘Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS)’ –

“Since almost all countries are either members or aspiring members of the World Trade Organization (WTO), and are thus conforming to the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement (TRIPS), the UCC has lost significance.”

Source:

Universal Copyright Convention
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Universal_Copyright_Convention

Again, we note the understandings reached concerning issues of creative intellectual property rights, when we learn of those acting on behalf of the authors to creative property, organizing their interests through their forums to settle on agreement, when we read, 1. Introduction, page 1, of, ‘Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property Rights in the 1930s’ –

After a series of bilateral agreements the main European book trading countries enacted in cooperation with culturally aware publishers and authors a multilateral agreement, the Berne Convention, in 1886. Although the American states passed the first Inter-American copyright agreement at the same time, the Convention of Montevideo in 1889, it was the Berne Convention, which proofed to be a reliable political instrument in the course of the twentieth century pointing the way ahead when intellectual property rights were institutionalized on a global scale first with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) in 1967 followed by the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 1994.

Source:

Selling Books: The League of Nations and the Globalization of Intellectual Property
Rights in the 1930s
Isabella Löhr, University of Leipzig
http://www.ebha.org/ebha2007/pdf/Loehr.pdf

~

But wait, returning to the excellent writings from COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS, those who don’t understand the dangers fictions can pose, are to be further deluded into thinking that they matter, with this –

7. Epilogue: Geneva, October 2007, page 549

“In October 2007, the WIPO Development Agenda was established by the WIPO General Assembly. Scholars have hailed it as a possible new departure for the international intellectual property regime, which has been completely dominated since 1994 by the trade-based rationales of WTO and the infamous Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights (TRIPS). TRIPS has eclipsed and helped render the UCC “wholly peripheral to the current international copyright framework” and is targeted for critique by developing nations, echoing concerns already articulated already in 1967. The Stockholm Protocol, a satellite “disconnected from its orbit”, is another instrument relegated to the cemetery where intellectual property texts go to die. Yet, each of these texts is part of the historical foundation from which the Development Agenda draws inspiration.

Although it remains to be seen what clout the Development Agenda will have to redress past wrongs and more recent sins in the power relations between developed and developing nations, it proposes substantial changes in both its general direction and WIPO governance. In 1884, 1885, and 1886 only a handful of nations were present to formulate the original Berne Convention, and they represented a diplomatic elite. Fifty-seven states and more than 400 inter-governmental and non-governmental organisations were present in Stockholm. At present, WIPO counts 184 member nations and over 250 NGOs among those who participate in Geneva deliberations. NGOs now out weigh states in total number, greatly accelerating the presence of civil society in these global arenas, suggesting, to Ruth Okediji, that states are not as important in setting the agenda as they used to be.”

Source:

Volume 7, Issue 3, December 2010
COLONIAL COPYRIGHT, POSTCOLONIAL PUBLICS :THE BERNE CONVENTIONAND THE 1967 STOCKHOLM DIPLOMATIC CONFERENCE REVISITED
Eva Hemmungs Wirtén
http://www.academia.edu/432552/_Colonial_Copyright_Postcolonial_Publics_the_Berne_Convention_and_the_1967_Stockholm_Diplomatic_Conference_Revisited_

Share