September 29, 2020

The Meaning And Origin Of “Pontifex Maximus”

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

As will be proven it is business as usual;

Key points of consideration

a failure to understand the nature of constitutions and legislative authority necessarily being personally owned private copyrighted intellectual property, and not withstanding that legislation emanating from these written instruments represent personally owned private law under the ownership of the self-validating clergy’s offices

multinationals are not the principle controling corporations for a push to global government. It is the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy’s personally owned private fictitious corporate copyrighted countries that are pushing for world government

the former Pope, John Paul II, fully advocated for global goverment in his Self-Ennobling representative office of Pontifex Maximus; the greatest of ‘bridge-builders’ (king)

~

The Meaning and Origin of “Pontifex Maximus”
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pI7pO2DlCRY

Pontifex Maximus
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pontifex_Maximus

THE POPES ARE CAESARS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ktf0d-ms7U

~

We read –

“…superior papal authority and dominion is derived from the law of the Caesars.”

Source:

Lucius Ferraris, in “Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica”, Volume VII, article on “Papa, Article II”, titled “Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility”, #19, page 27, published by Apud G. Storti, 1782 edition.

Material Source:
Adm. rev. p. F. Lucii Ferraris … Prompta Bibliotheca canonica, juridica, moralis, theologica …
by Lucius Ferraris
Published 1782
Volume 7
Publisher Apud G. Storti
#19, page 27
PAPA Art. II
https://archive.org/stream/admrevpfluciife05ferrgoog#page/n36/mode/1up

Google Translator and disambiguation, given in parts as:

Congruunt ulterius quo ad Papae summam auctoritatem

(‘Consistent further to the Pope’s supreme authority and powers’ – given to mean, ‘the Pope’s supreme authority and power are derived from or consist of’)

et potestarem textus juris Caesarei

(‘the text of the law and the powers of Caesar’ – given to mean, ‘power of Caesar’s law’)

Final disambiguation:

Congruunt ulterius quo ad Papae summam auctoritatem et porestarem textus juris Caesarei

“The Pope’s supreme authority and power are derived from, the power of Caesar’s law”

Reference Sources:

Ferraris, Prompta Bibliotheca
http://www.canonlaw.info/canonlaw_IUSPROMPT.htm

19. Congruunt ulterius quaod Papae summam auctoritatem et potestatem texius juris Caesarei.
Consistent beyond that superior papal authority and dominion is derived from the law of the Caesars.
PAPA – POPE
ARTICULUS II – ARTICLE 2
Quoadea quoeconcernunt papae dignitatem, auctoritatem, seu potestatem, et infallibilitatem.
Concerning the extent of Papal dignity, authority, or dominion and infallibility.
SUMMARIUM – SUMMARY
http://biblelight.net/1823-24.htm

Sourced:
Columns 1823 – 1824 (92K) – A summary of 82 points – a rough English Translation (incomplete)
Prompta Bibliotheca Canonica, Juridica, Moralis, Theologica, Ascetica, Polemica, Rubristica, Historica.
Vol. 5, published in Petit-Montrouge (Paris) by J. P. Migne, 1858 edition
by Lucius Ferraris
http://biblelight.net/prompta.htm

Title names of the Pope
http://vaticannewworldorder.blogspot.com/2012/04/on-this-page-you-will-find-authentic.html

“Quotes” of the Popes: Their Context and Legitimacy
http://americanberean.blogspot.com/2012/05/quotes-of-popes-their-context-and.html

~

the catholic church was never blackmailed, infiltrated, or taken over :

Divine right of kings –

The divine right of kings, or divine-right theory of kingship, is a political and religious doctrine of royal and political legitimacy. It asserts that a monarch is subject to no earthly authority, deriving the right to rule directly from the will of God.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings

Comment:

Divine Right of Kings –

If we consider that all men are ‘equally endowed’ by nature’s Cause with ‘innate freewill’, then the information we find in reading what is said about the Divine Right of Kings, as well as what is said concerning ‘the Church’, is something of a curiosity, since the Will of God, we would reasonably deduce in relation to man, is quite clear when it comes to all men everywhere – who are endowed with ‘an equal measure of freewill before nature’s Cause or nature’s God’, without exception in the realm of the physical world.

The source of a rebellion to what man sees as God’s Will, on the matter of freewill, would not be God as the source of rebellion contradicting Himself; we would reasonably deduce regarding ‘equal freewill’ in all men, but the source of rebellion, if we look to Heaven for heavenly authority and the source of what God would not make absurd in us, would then be an alternative to God’s Authority and the use by men of that ‘alternative authority’, in making ‘absurd’, equal innate freewill endowed by nature’s Cause or nature’s God in all men.

The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy –

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

Sourced:

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
GOBAL GOVERNANCE OF THE PRIESTS, BY THE PRIESTS, AND FOR THE PRIESTS
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iii/

~

the Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergy are as one in the world of fiction

the modern vatican, the United Nations (UN), is in the possession of the Self-Ennobling Ones

the workings and laws of the Roman Catholic Church (e.g. Canon Law and its branches being the legislative laws of countries) are not the business of the world at large and rightly remain the private business of the Self-Ennobling Ones

Share