THE LAW WAS MADE FOR ONE THING ALONE, FOR THE EXPLOITATION OF THOSE WHO DON’T UNDERSTAND IT – BERTOLT BRECHT, The Threepenny Opera
A comparison of the United States Constitution and the United Nations charter. One is based upon the idea that rights are given by men playing God, the other is based upon the idea that rights are provided by men in control of Governments again playing god.. And neither concept has anything to do with the Biblical Covenant other than as the adversary of that document, nor YHWH’s numerous LAWS laid out in that document.. The majority of Bible believers fall short on comprehending the origins of Equity described in the Bible. before you take your “case” against these ranchers who lease land from the real owner of that land you probably better read a few books on negligence, tort law, and legal malpractice.. If you don’t you’re going to get yourself in a bind… Also several books on public lands tenant lease laws… Several books on the laws of contracts.. Especially concerning federal contracts… Several books on court rules. Several books on international law.. Books on the assignment of public lands lease by leasee with contractual agreements delegated by lessor.. Better read some books on Civil procedure.. Books on the War Powers Act.. Books on Admiralty Maritime Laws. Of course the Law of Nations can be quite helpful in understanding who owns public property and correctly explains the position of the sovereign man versus the citizen man…
Additionally I strongly recommend you read the Elements of ecclesiastical law by S.B. Smith (1895)ART. II Of American Canon Law, or of the National Canon Law of the United States, pages 53 – pages 54, which in part reads as follows, 106. Q. What is meant by American canon law ? A. By the national eccl. law of this country we understand the various derogations from the ” jus commune, ” or the different customs that exist among the churches in the United States, and are sanctioned or tolerated by the Roman Pontiff. We say, ” are sanctioned or tolerated by the Roman Pontiff ” ; for, as was seen, no national law can become legitimate except by at least the tacit or legal consent of the Pope. Again, the ” jus particulare ” of a nation always remains subject to the authority of the Holy See in such manner as to be repealable at any time by it. Hence, the jus nationale, or the exceptional ecclesiastical laws prevalent in the United States, may be abolished at any time by the Sovereign Pontiff. .Then of course a deep forensic analysis read search concerning legal scientific and political reverse language, double speak will help you quite a lot… Then maybe you can actually accomplish some real advocacy… Remember now, you’re only as strong as your weakest argument… or you can keep proving The first code in the U.S. code section that claims you’re incompetent in these matters which then states that incompetence is insanity, U.S. Code › Title 1 › Chapter 1 › § 1 . That being said, The Traditions of Men Are Laws For Fictions – The ownership of man made up law is the ownership of the ‘traditions of men’, and as traditions, man made up laws are personally owned private fictions.. Hmmm.. The Bible has something to say about the traditions of men… And about fools thinking themselves wise…
“That issue of ‘Indepedence’, if it still hasn’t dawned on those who do not appreciate the revelation of everyone’s true ‘position’ world-wide, as that of being in involuntary servitude (slavery), by coming to an understanding of that ‘position’ through the distinction to be made between reality (real things or real nouns) and fiction (fictional or fictitious things or fictional nouns), and that shatters Machiavellian deception brought to the world at large by ‘the great and the good’, then perhaps ‘appreciation’ can be given greater clarity with reading The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 Article 4 shared below…”—Thereisnodebt
“According to the treaties that have been signed and are extant in International Law for the past 10 centuries, you cannot sue the state. This is the current system of “voluntary” forced labor using arbitrary private monopolistic powers. However, “fighting” the system with the system or within the system, is never going to work. The U.S. and its affiliate states have copyright on all of their “law”. “– If you use it without a variation by agreement, you are a tort-feasor.
Say’s the state not YOU citizens…
He who owns the law owns it all…
The Definitive Treaty of Peace 1783 Article 4
Paris Peace Treaty of 1783
Stated: “It is agreed that creditors on either side shall meet with no lawful impediment to the recovery of the full value in sterling money of all bona fide debts heretofore contracted.”
George Washington divided the States (Estates) into Districts. [Messages and papers of the Presidents Vo 1, pg 99. Webster’s 1828 dictionary for definition of Estate.]
The Articles of Confederation Article XII
“All bills of credit emitted, monies borrowed, and debts contracted by, or under the authority of Congress, before the assembling of the United States, in pursuance of the present confederation, shall be deemed and considered as a charge against the United States, for payment and satisfaction whereof the said United States, and the public faith are hereby solemnly pledged.”
On September 17, 1787 Nine State delegates approve the Constitution. The other four states silently acquiesced and it was ratified despite the rules under the articles of confederation of a unanimous decision. [Anti-Federalist Papers]The States have now become Constitutors.
Constitutor: “In the civil law, one who, by simple agreement, becomes responsible for the payment of another’s debt.” [Blacks Law Dictionary 5 Constitutum: In the civil law, an agreement to pay a subsisting debt which exists without any stipulation in that it must be for an existing debt.” [Blacks Law 5 Edition page 283]
Constitutio: “In civil law, an imperial ordinance, decree, or constitution, distinguished from Lex, Senatus-Consultum, and other kinds of law and having its effect from the sole will of the emperor. A sum paid according to an agreement.” [Blacks Law 5 page 282]
edition
Constitutiones: “Laws promulgated, i.e., enacted by the Roman Emperor…The emperor had this power of irresponsible enactment by virtue of a certain lex regia, whereby he was made the fountain of justice and of mercy.” [Blacks Law 5 “‘Civil Law,’ ‘Roman Law’ and ‘Roman Civil Law’ are convertible phrases, meaning the same system of jurisprudence.” [Black’s 3rd p 332.]
Article XI section I of the U.S. Constitution
Keeps the loans from the King valid it states; “All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.”
Article I Section XIII Clause II of the U.S. Constitution
states that “Congress has the power to borrow money on the faith and credit of the United States.” This was needed so the United States (Which went into Bankruptcy on January 1, 1788) could borrow money and then because the States were a party to the Constitution they would also be liable for it.
The States were now liable for the debt owed to the King, but the people of America were not because they were not a party to the Constitution because it was never put to them for a vote.
An Act making provision for the payment of the Debt of the United States was passed on August 4th, 1790 which can be found at [1 U.S. Statutes at Large pages 138-178.] This Act for all intents and purposes abolished the States and Created the Districts. In this Act each District was assigned a portion of the debt. The next step was for the states to reorganize their governments which most did in 1790. This had to be done because the States needed to legally bind the people to the debt. The original State Constitutions were never submitted to the people for a vote. So the governments wrote new constitutions and submitted them to people for a vote thereby binding the people to the debts owed to Great Britain. The people became citizens of the State where they resided and ipso facto a citizen of the United States. A citizen is a member of a fictional entity and it is synonymous with subject.
If one goes to 8 U.S. statutes at large 116-132 you will find “The Treaty of Amity, Commerce and Navigation”. This Treaty was signed on November 19th, 1794 which was twelve years after the War. Article 2 of the Treaty states that the King’s Troops were still occupying the United States. The troops would return to England by June 1st, 1796.
On September 30th, 1783 Benjamin Franklin, Esquire, John Adams, Esquire, and John Jay, Esquire, negotiated the terms of the debt repayment to Great Britain. [Definitive Peace Treaty of Paris 1783]
Benjamin Franklin Esquire was working for Great Britain, United States, and France. He was a triple agent who studied the works of Sir John Dee of Great Britain, who was known as Agent 007. [Secret Mysteries of Americas Beginnings]
Esquire defined in Merriam Dictionary means:
1 : a member of the English gentry ranking below a knight
2 : a candidate for knighthood serving as shield bearer and attendant to a knight
3 —used as a title of courtesy usually placed in its abbreviated form after the surname
4 archaic : a landed proprietor
“When people desired to come to this country for the purpose of settlement, it was necessary for them to· obtain permission from the government interested in that portion of the new country which they expected to occupy. The permits thus granted formed the basis of the new governments set upon this side of the Atlantic. Sometimes these permits were granted by the king to a company, whose members either sent out colonists to the new country or came themselves as colonists. Such permits were known as Royal Charters and were in reality a form of constitution granted by the king to the colonists, defining their rights and privileges.
They usually outlined the form of government, providing for a governor and council. Sometimes these permits were granted to individuals called proprietors, and the governments set up by them were called Proprietary Governments. These proprietors in turn granted charters to their colonists, so that in general the government of charter colonies and of proprietary governments was very similar.
In time, however, all but a few of the colonies lost or surrendered their charters, passed under the direct Government of the mother country (England), and came to be known as Royal Provinces. In the royal provinces the king could rule with greater freedom. He appointed the governor and the colonial judges, and everywhere except in Massachusetts, the governor’s council also. Notwithstanding this, the colonists’ retained no small measure of self-government.” [Berle’s_Self_Culture_p304]
These men were “proprietors” of companies…the East India Company being the “Grand Corporation” with its “red, white, and blue” striped flag.
You don’t think that they knew that they were still subservient to the Crown…..read the letter from Hartley of Parliament and US Foreign Affairs Secretary: Fox……
NOTE REGARDING THE ALTERNAT;
The form of the treaty was the subject of some correspondence between Fox, Secretary of State for Foreign Affairs, and Hartley. Copies of the letters are in Bancroft’s Transcripts, Hartley’s Negotiations, II, 53, 57, NYPL On August 21, 1783, Fox wrote to Hartley:
“One thing only I must remind you of in point of form. When a treaty is signed between two Crowned Heads in order to prevent disputes about presidency, the name of the one stands first in one instrument and that of the other in the other but when the Treaty is between a crowned Head and a Republic, the name of the Monarch is mentioned first in each instrument. I believe if you will inquire upon this subject among the Corps Diplomatique, you will find this to have been the constant practice.
Hartley replied as follows under date of September 1:
The treaties are drawn out for signature as you have expressed it viz: giving precedence to the Crowned Head. The American Ministers never had a thought of disputing the priority or equality of rank & therefore I have had no occasion to mention the subject.” [British-American Diplomacy Treaty of Paris – Hunter Miller’s Notes]
“Mr. American”….since “your American Ministers” never thought of disputing the priority or EQUALITY OF RANK…that being the Crown had “Precedence”…..then where does that leave you? Subject that is “subjected”, correct?
Article XI U.S. Constitution
States” All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation.
This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding.
The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.”
That’s International Treaties dealing with the International Public Order i.e., The High Contracting Parties i.e., the Pope. All Treaties signed are the Supreme Law of the Land. Therefore Contract Law is the Supreme Law of the Land, not the con-stitution!
Furthermore, you cannot dispute the debt or it will be in surmounting of insurrection and rebellion. Slavery is illegal as involuntary servitude. However, voluntary servitude is not.
14th Amendment, Amendment XIV Section 4 U.S. Constitution
States that “The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.”
Article I Section 8 U.S. Constitution
States “The Congress shall have power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts and excises, to pay the debts and provide for the common defense and general welfare of the United States; but all duties, imposts and excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
“To borrow money on the credit of the United States;”
“To define and punish piracies and felonies committed on the high seas, and offenses against the law of nations;”
The constitution makes a reference to the “Law of Nations.” Ask a constitutional expert what exactly is the “Law of Nations” and your response might be shocking. They study the constitution, why don’t they study the Law of Nations? What is the Law of Nations? It is Public international law. And it is the Supreme Law of the Land.
The Law of Nations is International Law. “the law which regulates the intercourse of nations; the law of nations. The customary law which determines the rights
“Public international law concerns the structure and conduct of sovereign states, analogous entities, such as the Holy See, and intergovernmental organizations. To a lesser degree, international law also may affect multinational corporations and individuals.”
“The field of study combines two main branches: the law of nations (jus gentium) and international agreements and conventions (jus inter gentes), which have different theoretical foundations and should not be confused.”
“Public international law should not be confused with “private international law”, which is concerned with the resolution of conflict of laws. In its most general sense, international law “consists of rules and principles of general application dealing with the conduct of states and of intergovernmental organizations and with their relations inter se, as well as with some of their relations with persons, whether natural or juridical.”
What is the Holy See? The Holy See is From the Latin Sancta Sedes, Holy Chair. A term derived from the enthronement-ceremony of the bishops of Rome. The papal enjoyed reservations of benefices, customary in the Middle Ages.
The terms “Holy See” and “Apostolic See”
Every episcopal see is considered holy. In Greek, the adjective “holy” or “sacred” (????) is constantly applied to all such sees as a matter of course. In the West, the adjective is not commonly added, but it does form part of an official title of two sees: as well as Rome, the Bishopric of Mainz (the former Archbishopric of Mainz), which was also of electoral and primatial rank, bears the title of “the Holy See of Mainz” (Latin: Sancta Sedes Moguntina).
The term “see” comes from the Latin word “sedes”, meaning “seat”, which refers to the Episcopal throne (cathedra). The term “Apostolic See” can refer to any see founded by one of the Apostles, but, when used with the definite article, it is used in the Catholic Church to refer specifically to the see of the Bishop of Rome, whom that Church sees as successor of Saint Peter, the chief of the apostles. [Catholic Encyclopedia] [Wikipedia]
The Pope claims to own the entire planet through the laws of conquest and discovery.[Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493]
The Pope has ordered the genocide and enslavement of millions of people. [Papal Bulls of 1455 and 1493] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Romanus_Pontifex
The Pope’s laws are obligatory on everyone. [Bened. XIV., De Syn. Dioec, lib, ix., c. vii., n. 4. Prati, 1844)(Syllabus, prop 28, 29, 44][ Elements of Ecclesiastical Law Vol. 1 53- 54]
Civil Governments are the Popes governments. If there is any doubt to the validity of any and all references they can be found also in another location other than the Avalon Project of Yale as to provide a double witness to the accounts that have taken place which have formed history and the current state of affairs. You may find the link below titled “European Treaties Bearing on the History of the United States” http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=23628818
